NYCHA Dev Rights Report FINAL1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NYCHA Dev Rights Report FINAL1 LAND RICH, POCKET POOR Making the Most of New York City Housing Authority’s (NYCHA) Unused Development Rights Manhattan Borough President Scott M. Stringer August 2008 About Manhattan Borough President Scott M. Stringer = pÅçíí=jK=píêáåÖÉêI=~=å~íáîÉ=kÉï=vçêâÉêI=ï~ë=ëïçêå=áå=~ë=j~åÜ~íí~åÛë=OSíÜ=_çêçìÖÜ=mêÉëáÇÉåí=áå= g~åì~êó=OMMSK=aìêáåÖ=Üáë=íÉåìêÉI=_çêçìÖÜ=mêÉëáÇÉåí=píêáåÖÉê=Ü~ë=äÉÇ=íÜÉ=ï~ó=áå=~ÇÇêÉëëáåÖ=ã~åó=çÑ= j~åÜ~íí~åÛë= ãçëí= éêÉëëáåÖ= áëëìÉëI= áåÅäìÇáåÖW= áåÅêÉ~ëáåÖ= Åçããìåáíó= áåéìí= ~åÇ= êÉëéçåëÉ= íç= ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåí= ~åÇ= éä~ååáåÖ= éêçàÉÅíë= ~Åêçëë= íÜÉ= ÄçêçìÖÜX= áåíêçÇìÅáåÖ= ÅçãéêÉÜÉåëáîÉ= êÉÑçêã= ~åÇ= ÉãéçïÉêãÉåí= ãÉ~ëìêÉë= íç= j~åÜ~íí~åÛë= `çããìåáíó= _ç~êÇëX= äÉ~ÇáåÖ= íÜÉ= ÑáÖÜí= íç= ã~áåí~áå= ~åÇ= ÅêÉ~íÉ=åÉï=~ÑÑçêÇ~ÄäÉ=ÜçìëáåÖ=ìåáíë=~Åêçëë=íÜÉ=ÄçêçìÖÜX=ÉãéçïÉêáåÖ=é~êÉåíë=íç=ÄÉííÉê=é~êíáÅáé~íÉ=áå= íÜÉ= éìÄäáÅ= ëÅÜççä= ëóëíÉãX= áåîÉëíáÖ~íáåÖ= ~åÇ= êÉÅçããÉåÇáåÖ= éçäáÅó= ~Åíáçå= çå= íÜÉ= ÅáíóÛë= ã~åó= íê~åëéçêí~íáçå=áëëìÉëX=~åÇ=ÜÉäéáåÖ=ïçêâáåÖ=Ñ~ãáäáÉë=~åÇ=ëã~ää=ÄìëáåÉëëÉë=~ÅÅÉëë=êÉëçìêÅÉë=íç=ÄÉÅçãÉ= ~åÇ=êÉã~áå=ëÉäÑJëìÑÑáÅáÉåíK=^ë=_çêçìÖÜ=mêÉëáÇÉåíI=ÜÉ=Ü~ë=~äëç=êÉäÉ~ëÉÇ=íÜÉ=ÑçääçïáåÖ=êÉéçêíëW= • pÉåëÉäÉëë=pìÄëáÇáÉëW=^=oÉéçêí=çå=q~ñ=_ÉåÉÑáíë=råÇÉê=íÜÉ=fåÇìëíêá~ä=~åÇ=`çããÉêÅá~ä= fåÅÉåíáîÉ=mêçÖê~ã=Ej~ó=OMMUFX= = • `êçïÇÉÇ=lìíW=pÅÜççä=`çåëíêìÅíáçå=c~áäë=íç=hÉÉé=ré=táíÜ=j~åÜ~íí~å=_ìáäÇáåÖ=_ççã= E^éêáä=OMMUFX= = • ^=tçêâáåÖ=_~ä~åÅÉW=pìééçêíáåÖ=kÉï=vçêâ=`áíóÛë=c~ãáäáÉë=íÜêçìÖÜ=m~áÇ=c~ãáäó=iÉ~îÉ= Eg~åì~êó=OMMUFX= = • tÉ=t~åí=vçìEíÜF>=J=`çåÑêçåíáåÖ=råêÉÖìä~íÉÇ=jáäáí~êó=oÉÅêìáíãÉåí=áå=kÉï=vçêâ=`áíó= mìÄäáÅ=pÅÜççäë=EpÉéíÉãÄÉê=OMMTFX= = • eáÇÇÉå=áå=mä~áå=páÖÜíW=pÉñì~ä=e~ê~ëëãÉåí=~åÇ=^ëë~ìäí=áå=íÜÉ=kÉï=vçêâ=`áíó=pìÄï~ó=póëíÉã= Egìäó=OMMTFX= = • kç=s~Å~åÅóW=qÜÉ=oçäÉ=çÑ=råÇÉêìíáäáòÉÇ=mêçéÉêíáÉë=áå=jÉÉíáåÖ=j~åÜ~íí~åÛë=^ÑÑçêÇ~ÄäÉ= eçìëáåÖ=kÉÉÇë=E^éêáä=OMMTFX= = • kç=t~ó=lìíW=^å=^å~äóëáë=çÑ=qÜÉ=kÉï=vçêâ=pí~íÉ=aÉé~êíãÉåí=çÑ=eÉ~äíÜÛë=oçäÉ=áå=mêÉé~êáåÖ= kìêëáåÖ=eçãÉë=Ñçê=bãÉêÖÉåÅáÉë=EaÉÅÉãÄÉê=OMMSFX= = • _êÉ~âáåÖ=m~êçäÉW=^å=^å~äóëáë=çÑ=qÜÉ=kÉï=vçêâ=pí~íÉ=aáîáëáçå=çÑ=m~êçäÉÛë=`~ëÉäç~Ç= j~å~ÖÉãÉåí=dìáÇÉäáåÉë=EaÉÅÉãÄÉê=OMMSFX= = • qÜÉ=pí~íÉ=çÑ=oÉé~áêëW=^å=bñ~ãáå~íáçå=çÑ=bäÉî~íçê=~åÇ=bëÅ~ä~íçê=j~áåíÉå~åÅÉ=~åÇ=oÉé~áêë=áå= kÉï=vçêâ=`áíóÛë=pìÄï~ó=póëíÉã=E^ìÖìëí=OMMSFX= = • qÜáåâáåÖ=lìíëáÇÉ=íÜÉ=_çñW=^å=^å~äóëáë=çÑ=j~åÜ~íí~å=dêáÇäçÅâ=~åÇ=péáääÄ~Åâ=båÑçêÅÉãÉåí= Egìäó=OMMSFX=~åÇ= = • m~êÉåíë=aáëãáëëÉÇW=^å=^å~äóëáë=çÑ=j~åÜ~íí~åÛë=`çããìåáíó=bÇìÅ~íáçå=`çìåÅáäë=~åÇ=íÜÉ= kÉï=vçêâ=`áíó=aÉé~êíãÉåí=çÑ=bÇìÅ~íáçåÛë=oçäÉ=áå=båÖ~ÖáåÖ=m~êÉåí=iÉ~ÇÉêë=EgìåÉ=OMMSFK= Acknowledgments = = = = qÜÉ=_çêçìÖÜ=mêÉëáÇÉåí=íÜ~åâë=~ää=íÜÉ=ëí~ÑÑ=çÑ=Üáë= qÜÉ=_çêçìÖÜ=mêÉëáÇÉåí=~äëç=íÜ~åâë=íÜÉ=ÑçääçïáåÖ= çÑÑáÅÉ=ïÜç=ÜÉäéÉÇ=ÇÉîÉäçé=~åÇ=éìÄäáëÜ=íÜáë=êÉéçêíK== ëí~ÑÑ=ãÉãÄÉêë=ïÜç=ïçêâÉÇ=çå=íÜáë=êÉéçêíW=`~êãÉå= = _ççåI= mêÉëë= pÉÅêÉí~êóX= ^ä~áå~= `çäçåI= `ÜáÉÑ= çÑ= få= é~êíáÅìä~êI= íÜÉ= _çêçìÖÜ= mêÉëáÇÉåí= íÜ~åâë= íÜÉ= pí~ÑÑX= p~ê~Ü= dÉáÖÉêI= i~åÇ= rëÉ= fåíÉêåX= hÉå= ÑçääçïáåÖ= ëí~ÑÑ= ãÉãÄÉêë= Ñçê= íÜÉáê= ïçêâ= ~ë= íÜÉ= kÉãÅÜáåI= dê~éÜáÅ= ^êíáëíX= `ìçåÖ= kÖìóÉåI= éêáã~êó= êÉëÉ~êÅÜÉêë= ~åÇ= ïêáíÉêë= çÑ= íÜáë= êÉéçêíW= aÉéìíó=`ÜáÉÑ=çÑ=pí~ÑÑX=p~ëÅÜ~=mìêáíòI=aáêÉÅíçê=çÑ= ^åíÜçåó=_çêÉääáI=aáêÉÅíçê=çÑ=i~åÇ=rëÉI=mä~ååáåÖ= bñíÉêå~ä= ^ÑÑ~áêëX= pÅçíí= pÅÜÉääI= mçäáÅó= aáêÉÅíçêX= ~åÇ= aÉîÉäçéãÉåíX= a~å= dçäìÄI= aÉéìíó= aáêÉÅíçê= aáÅâ=oáäÉóI=`çããìåáÅ~íáçåë=aáêÉÅíçêX=~åÇ=g~ëçå= çÑ= i~åÇ= rëÉI= mä~ååáåÖ= ~åÇ= aÉîÉäçéãÉåí= ~åÇ= tÉäÅÜI= péÉÅá~ä= ^ëëáëí~åí= íç= íÜÉ= aáêÉÅíçê= çÑ= pÉåáçê= mçäáÅó= ^ÇîáëçêX= oó~å= d~äîáåI= aÉéìíó= bñíÉêå~ä=^ÑÑ~áêëK= aáêÉÅíçê=çÑ=mçäáÅó=~åÇ=oÉëÉ~êÅÜX=~åÇ=_êá~å=`ççâI= = pÉåáçê=rêÄ~å=mä~ååÉêK=== = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = throughout the City, work with affected stakeholders to propose a long-term strategic I. plan for these development rights, and institute Executive Summary a site-specific planning process for each development that will ensure sufficient public The New York City Housing Authority review of individual development proposals. (NYCHA) controls what is probably the last large-scale stock of publicly owned property in the City. Unused development rights on these properties present a tremendous opportunity to meet the City’s affordable housing crisis, to II. provide revenue to address NYCHA’s critical budget needs – or to pursue some combination Background & History of both goals. The New York City Housing Authority An analysis by the Manhattan Borough (“NYCHA”) was created in 1934, after the New President’s Office indicates that under existing York State Legislature passed the Municipal zoning, Manhattan NYCHA properties have a Housing Authority Act. The Act permitted combined total of 30.5 million square feet of municipalities to form local authorities to unused development rights, which can be develop low-cost housing, financed by the sale developed on site or transferred to adjacent of municipal bonds or by federal funds. In properties as-of-right. 30.5 million square feet 1935, NYCHA completed its first development, is equivalent to more than 35,000 units of aptly named “First Houses,” at Avenue A and housing or more than 11 Empire State Buildings East 3 rd Street. 1 However, the City did not – an asset worth potentially billions of dollars. seriously pursue the large-scale production of public housing until the 1950’s, when the This development potential derives in large part Mayor’s Committee on Slum Clearance, headed from the public actions – “slum clearance,” by Robert Moses, championed high-rise “towers eminent domain, and street demapping – that in the park” as a means to expand the supply of the City took when the developments were quality affordable housing. 2 designed. NYCHA is currently partnering with City agencies and private developers to make Towers-in-the-park apartment buildings are use of unused development rights on three of placed symmetrically within well-landscaped its Manhattan properties, at least partly to raise open spaces. Most NYCHA developments revenue to meet its $195.3 million budget gap. follow this characteristic form. To But NYCHA has yet to publicly articulate any accommodate this design, the City cleared overall long-term strategic plan for its unused blocks entirely or in large portion to create large development rights throughout the City. While contiguous development sites, sometimes it is understandable that NYCHA would utilizing eminent domain to condemn existing consider using its assets to meet budget needs, properties. Often, the City also "demapped" we should not begin disposing of a potentially public streets to combine several city blocks, multibillion-dollar asset in a piecemeal manner creating a “superblock” large enough for the to meet short-term needs without first planned buildings and open space. Developers developing a thoughtful, long-term strategy. and planners argued at the time that additional area was needed for projects to achieve the scale The City, and especially the public housing necessary to create a sufficient return on community, should collectively determine the optimal use of these public assets, and determine how to balance NYCHA’s budget 1 “NYCHA Factsheet,” http://www.nyc.gov/html/nycha/html/about/factsheet.sht needs with the need to create new affordable ml , accessed July 31, 2008. housing. NYCHA should immediately 2 Plunz, Richard, “A History of Housing in New York City,” catalogue its unused development rights Columbia University Press, New York, 1990. p 281. 1 investment while maintaining the integrity of For many years, it was unclear whether the tower-in-the-park design. The result was NYCHA would ever seek to utilize the that most NYCHA developments occupy theoretical development potential on their unusually large lots that are very dissimilar from properties. But recently, it has become clear the general pattern of the surrounding that NYCHA does recognize the development Manhattan street grid. When the City approved potential of its properties under the City’s construction of an individual NYCHA zoning, and plans to access the development development, it conducted public studies similar potential of its property in partnership with to today’s process of environmental review, private developers. examining the effects of the new development on community facilities, mass transit, streets and parking, emergency access, and public utilities, and planning accordingly for public facilities necessary to meet those needs. 3 III. In 1961, after almost all of NYCHA’s planned Current Context communities and other developments had already been designed, New York City NYCHA has run significant budget deficits implemented comprehensive new zoning. City since 2001. However, it was not until the spring planners divided the City into zoning districts, of 2006, when NYCHA released its proposed and assigned each zoning district its own Floor budget and a Plan to Preserve Public Housing Area Ratio (FAR) to regulate the density of (“PPPH”), that the scale of NYCHA’s debt and development in each neighborhood. Under the its urgent need to cut spending and raise 1961 zoning, which still prevails today, the revenue garnered widespread public attention. development potential of a site is determined by In the PPPH, a seven-point plan providing multiplying the size of the lot by the zoning solutions for closing the authority’s then-$168 district’s assigned FAR. If the total million deficit, NYCHA briefly offered options development potential of a site exceeds the for diversifying revenue streams, including amount of development currently occupying the revenue gains from the transfer of unused site, the property owner can either add development rights to developers. additional development to the site, or can sell or transfer the excess development rights to In a June 2006 amendment to its Annual Plan adjacent properties.
Recommended publications
  • NEWS RELEASE Henry Street Settlement Responds to the COVID
    NEWS RELEASE Henry Street Settlement Responds to the COVID-19 Outbreak March 19, 2020 Contact: Barbara Kancelbaum, 718-744-5310 New York, N.Y. -- Henry Street Settlement is safely providing essential services to our neighbors on the Lower East Side and throughout New York City to help everyone remain healthy and access the resources they need to get through the COVID-19 outbreak. Because this crisis poses a particular threat to the many low-income New Yorkers whom Henry Street serves, the Settlement is actively providing food, connections to needed benefits, crucial information to stay safe, and emotional support. Details follow below. Henry Street’s core services never close. Our four transitional housing residences, two supportive housing buildings, Senior Center, Meals on Wheels, and the Community Consultation Center are continuing to provide essential services to our residents and participants, particularly those who are high risk. We have suspended services that bring large groups of people together and moved others online, from ESOL classes to instrumental music lessons. “Henry Street Settlement has been opening doors, listening to the needs of our community, and responding promptly and effectively for 127 years,” said David Garza, president and CEO. “From the outset of the COVID-19 outbreak, we have been focusing on the health and safety of the community we serve, the protection and support of the team at Henry Street, and the continuity of our services and operations. Because of our long-standing role in caring for the most vulnerable New Yorkers, we now find ourselves at the epicenter of providing vital services, safety, and stability to our residents, clients, and participants at this critical time.
    [Show full text]
  • Have a Happy Halloween!
    Vol. 34, No. 10 First Class U.S. Postage Paid — Permit No. 4119, New York, N.Y. 10007 October 2004 THIRD ANNUAL KIDS’ WALK IN THE BRONX Modernization Project at Whitman/Ingersoll music, and dance to greet the One of NYCHA’s Largest Capital Improvement Projects young walkers, warm them up and cheer them on along their mile and a half trek around the track. Then, after a healthful lunch, games and activities filled the afternoon, along with educational and informational materials and face painting by Harborview Arts Center Artist-Consultant and pro- fessional clown Mimi Martinez. “Do you want to have this kind of fun next summer?” NYCHA Vice Chairman Earl Andrews, Jr. asked the assembled young peo- ple. After the loud and unsurpris- ing positive response, Mr. Andrews promised that NYCHA would do everything it could to find the funds to make Kids’ Walk On August 13th, NYCHA’s Chairman Tino Hernandez joined res- happen again. That message was idents and elected officials for a tour through Ingersoll Houses, reinforced by Board Member highlighting four model apartments. Shown here (front row, left Young residents from NYCHA’s Summer Camp program pre- JoAnna Aniello, Deputy General to right) are Whitman Houses Resident Association President pare for their one-and-a-half mile walk in Van Cortlandt Park. Manager for Community Opera- Rosalind Williams, Ingersoll Relocation Vice-Chairwoman Gloria tions Hugh B. Spence, Assistant Collins, Ingersoll Relocation Committee Member Janie Williams, By Allan Leicht Deputy General Manager for Ingersoll Relocation Committee Chairwoman Veronica Obie, ids’ Walk 2004, NYCHA’s third annual summer children’s Community Operations Michelle and Ingersoll Houses Resident Association President Dorothy walkathon to promote physical recreation and combat obesity Pinnock, and Director of Citywide Berry.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobias Armborst, Georgeen Theodore, and Daniel D'oca Of
    NORCs IN NEW YORK Tobias armborsT, GeorGeen Theodore, and daniel d’oCa of inTerboro ParTners Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/thld_a_00145 by guest on 23 September 2021 INTERBORO PARTNERS NORC is a funny word, but we didn’t make it up. On the contrary, the word is recognized by the local, state, and federal government, and has been in use since 1986. Actually, NORC is an acronym. It stands for “Naturally Occurring Retirement Community.” Basically, a NORC is a place (a building, a development, a neighborhood) with a significant elderly population that wasn’t purpose-built as a senior community. What counts as a “significant elderly population” varies from place to place (and from one level of government to the next), but that’s the basic definition. NORCs are important because once a community meets the criteria, it becomes eligible for local, state, and federal funds to retroactively provide that community with the support services elderly populations need (for example, case management and social work services, health care management and prevention programs, education, socialization, and recreational activities, and volunteer opportunities for program participants and the community). As it happens, there are 27 NORCs in New York City, located in four boroughs. NORCs are a national—even international— phenomenon, but the NORC movement began right here in New York City, when a consortium of UJA-Federation agencies THRESHOLDS 40 established the Penn South Program for Seniors in 1986. Let us say a few words about why we’re so interested in NORCs: First of all, the “naturally occurring” part is intriguing.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Street Settlement Virtual Senior Center “Where Good Friends Meet”
    Henry Street Settlement Virtual Senior Center “Where Good Friends Meet” ONGOING CLASSES!! Coming Soon: To register for virtual tours, trips or More Virtual Classes 2:00-4:00 pm: NEW!! “Fun & PRESENTATIONS: concerts, be added to our member PLUS Games Mondays” Games, email list to receive this calendar & Virtual Presentations, Movies, Karaoke and more w/ 3:00 pm: Remembering Dr. early notice of special programming Trips, Tours & Christina & Theresa Martin Luther King Jr. w/Olivia Performances Zoom Mtg ID: 920 8476 6393 Zoom ID: 927 2055 0008 or for more information, please contact us at Funded by the NYC Click Here To Join Zoom Class!! Click Here To Join Zoom Class!! Department for the Aging & EVERY MONDAY!! on 1/15/2021 [email protected] Henry Street Settlement or call 347-493-2787 1:00 pm: Cooking w/ Ann 3:00 pm: “The Body vs. Corona Zoom Mtg ID: 830 8892 0001 Virus“ Documentary by Click Here To Join Zoom Class!! ‘Curiosity Planet’ w/ Olivia Do you live in the Vladeck Houses Haven’t Heard From a Friend Every Tuesday!!! Zoom Mtg ID: 805 494 4886 from the Center Lately? Please Click Here To Join Zoom Class!! and need some help or support? Let Us Know so We Can Make 1/19/2021 1:00 pm: Pet Visiting w/ Amy Call our NORC/ Vladeck Cares Office at Sure They’re OK Zoom Mtg ID: 810 7727 0496 Click Here To Join Zoom Class!! PARTIES/CELEBRATIONS: 212-477-0455. Our office (located at 1/7/2021 & 1/21/2021 351 Madison Street) is currently 3:00 pm: Seniors’ Announcements 2:00 pm: Drawing w/ Will closed by order of the City of NY due We will Not hold classes on New Zoom Mtg ID: 812 1135 0510 December Birthday Years Day & Martin Luther King Day Party!! w/ Olivia to the Pandemic but Staff is still Click Here To Join Zoom Class!! Friday, January 1st is “New Years Day” 1/7/2021 & 1/21/2021 Zoom Mtg ID: 884 2701 8730 assisting Vladeck Houses senior Monday, January 18th is Click Here to Join Zoom Class!! “Martin Luther King Day” residents over the telephone only 01/28 January is Monday - Friday 9 AM-5 PM.
    [Show full text]
  • Vending Machines for NYCHA
    First-Class U.S. Postage Paid New York, NY Permit No. 4119 Vol. 38, No. 3 www.nyc.gov/nycha MARCH 2008 NYCHA ADOPTS PRELIMINARY BUDGET FOR 2008 By Eileen Elliott THE NEW YORK CITY HOUSING of New York City and while we contribute to the deficit include: AUTHORITY (NYCHA) BOARD do have to make tough choices, the cost of operating 21 State and ADOPTED A $2.8 BILLION we have nearly 70 years of being City-built developments, which FISCAL YEAR 2008 PRELIMI- the first, the biggest and the best. amounts to $93 million annually; NARY OPERATING BUDGET We’ll get through this. We’ve an increase in non-discretionary ON JANUARY 23rd. The budget been through hard times before.” employee benefit expenses of $40 includes a $195 million structural million; $68 million for policing deficit, resulting in large part Chronic Federal services; and another $68 million from chronic Federal under- Underfunding for NYCHA-provided community funding. Before adopting the “NYCHA has lost over $611 and social services. budget, NYCHA Chairman Tino million in Federal aid since Hernandez vowed that the 2001,” said NYCHA Deputy Victories Housing Authority will continue General Manager for Finance “In many ways, NYCHA is to take aggressive action in the Felix Lam in his budget presenta- a victim of its own success,” coming year to preserve public tion at the meeting. He added that said Chairman Tino Hernandez, housing in New York City. the last time public housing was referring to the fact that NYCHA fully funded was in 2002. has managed to maintain its level Commitment to For 2008, the Federal subsidy of service despite nearly seven DISINVESTMENT The graph above shows the decline in Public Housing NYCHA receives will again be years of underfunding.
    [Show full text]
  • Lowline Community Engagement Meeting Recap June 13, 2016, 6-8Pm, Grand Street Guild Residents Association
    Lowline Community Engagement Meeting Recap June 13, 2016, 6-8pm, Grand Street Guild Residents Association Longtime residents of the Lower East Side, local advocates and organization leaders gathered on June 13, 2016 for the Lowline’s first Community Engagement Committee meeting. Below you will find a detailed meeting recap. Questions and comments can be sent to [email protected]. 1. Margaret Chin, NYC Council Member, District 1, provided remarks on the Lowline project, overviewing the history of the organization, and the positive impact the future park could have on local residents, and the community at large. 2. Dan Barasch, Co-Founder, the Lowline, provided an overview on the Lowline project, and the Lowline Lab. 3. Public discussion covered the following topics: a. Programming ideas for the future Lowline b. Design ideas for the future Lowline c. Concerns + challenges regarding the future Lowline d. Short term ideas + community oriented uses for the Lowline Lab e. Committee leadership, governance, and roles + responsibilities f. Next steps Ideas covered per topic: 1. Programming ideas for the future Lowline: a. Youth programming and school-based programming at the future Lowline will tap into a definite need in the community. The Lowline’s Young Designers Program, a free science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education platform will continue. Additional ideas including a gardening education programs; and educational programming dedicated to aquaponics, solar energy, and the history of the Lower East Side. b. There is a demonstrable need in the area for programs geared toward teens. How can the Lowline actively engage teens when thinking about cultural and educational programming? c.
    [Show full text]
  • LOWLINE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Karp Strategies with Replace Urban Studio Executive Summary
    LOWLINE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Karp Strategies with rePlace Urban Studio Executive Summary The Lowline is a plan to build a green public space in an abandoned underground trolley terminal in the Lower East Side. Innovative solar technology will bring sunlight below ground into this one acre site. The Lowline collaborated with a consultant team to conduct focused community engagement of Lower East Side residents, businesses, and organizations from October 2016 through June 2017. This team held over 15 outreach events, including large public workshops, small focus groups, and youth training sessions, and deployed a digital platform to collect feedback from those who could not attend in person. At the conclusion of this phase of outreach, over 108,860 people directly engaged with the Lowline via these outreach activities and the Lowline lab. The primary findings that emerged from this work reveal that participants envision the future site as: a community-driven, inclusive, and free space; a space with many green and natural elements that can offer an oasis from the streets above; and a place for technological and environmental education, with a focus on youth empowerment. Participants also want to continue to have a say in the Lowline’s future development, programming, and operations. Lowline Community Engagement - July 2017 Karp Strategies | rePLACE Urban Studio 2 Lowline Community Engagement - July 2017 Karp Strategies | rePLACE Urban Studio 3 BACKGROUND • Project Background • Project Location • Community Snapshot • Engagement History • Community Input On Operations and Goverance This page left intentionally blank. Project Background The Lowline is an effort to build a lush, green public community space in an historic trolley terminal on the Lower East Side of New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • Baruch & Baruch Addition
    New York City T ST S Wald AN HousingTO Authority F N F S I T # R 140 E 17 H Baruch & Baruch Houses AdditionS # E H 130 OUS TON 170T 85 0 170 Feet ST S S L TA T N # 120 P # T TO 120 I N 16 H P S T 105 # C R # # 9 U T R D 110 S 110 A R 10 # B N I D 95 Lavanburg Homes G F T N S A 605 M # A I 90 # B Gompers R 1 M # 15 D # U H 90 595 L 80 # C O U C 79 R # # 8 A 80 11 B 79GAR # # 75 577 19 # 7 2 Baruch Houses Addition 72 # # 571 72 # 5 18 # T 70 I X 60# 555 E 296 # B 14 # N # 298# D D R EL EL 3 A A 288# # D N N 50 12 CE CE 13 549 Y S Y S R T WI T # D LL F IAM 64# SB 292 W UR 308# ILL G 5 R IA BR # D Legend DE MS AP # L B P 6 R AN UR R W 60 R C G IL D D E L 312 NYCHA Tax Lot BoundaryY BR IA 525 S M F R T A # PP SB R U D NYCHA Buildings with Building & Address Numbers R G B R A F PP 4 W Water R #521 B 4 L R O H O L T ParksM and Open Space T I S E P S S X T T R H E R N S D Streets C T E B O V S U S R I S I N R Buildings N D R N W I R ◄ A A E D F E B G Entrance L C µ N R A D M F BARUCH BLDG# BIN # M SH# ADDRESS ZIP CODE BLOCK LOT AMP# FACILITY PLAYGROUND (MANAGED BY NYC DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & 68 BARUCH DRIVE 10002 323 1 NY005010600 RECREATION) COMMUNITY CENTER/ SETTLEMENT MAIL ROOM/ ROOFTOP LEASE 1 1078027 M 001 605 FDR DRIVE 10002 323 1 NY005010600 LOCATION 1 1078027 M 002 595 FDR DRIVE 10002 323 1 NY005010600 2 1078028 M 003 577 FDR DRIVE 10002 323 1 NY005010600 ROOFTOP LEASE LOCATION 2 1078028 M 004 571 FDR DRIVE 10002 323 1 NY005010600 STOVE ROOM 3 1078029 M 005 555 FDR DRIVE 10002 323 1 NY005010600 GLAZIERS SHOP 3 1078029 M 006 549 FDR DRIVE
    [Show full text]
  • Zoning Text Amendment (ZR Sections 74-743 and 74-744) 3
    UDAAP PROJECT SUMMARY Site BLOCK LOT ADDRESS Site 1 409 56 236 Broome Street Site 2 352 1 80 Essex Street Site 2 352 28 85 Norfolk Street Site 3 346 40 (p/o) 135-147 Delancey Street Site 4 346 40 (p/o) 153-163 Delancey Street Site 5 346 40 (p/o) 394-406 Grand Street Site 6 347 71 178 Broome Street Site 8 354 1 140 Essex Street Site 9 353 44 116 Delancey Street Site 10 354 12 121 Stanton Street 1. Land Use: Publicly-accessible open space, roads, and community facilities. Residential uses - Sites 1 – 10: up to 1,069,867 zoning floor area (zfa) - 900 units; LSGD (Sites 1 – 6) - 800 units. 50% market rate units. 50% affordable units: 10% middle income (approximately 131-165% AMI), 10% moderate income (approximately 60-130% AMI), 20% low income, 10% senior housing. Sufficient residential square footage will be set aside and reserved for residential use in order to develop 900 units. Commercial development: up to 755,468 zfa. If a fee ownership or leasehold interest in a portion of Site 2 (Block 352, Lots 1 and 28) is reacquired by the City for the purpose of the Essex Street Market, the use of said interest pursuant to a second disposition of that portion of Site 2 will be restricted solely to market uses and ancillary uses such as eating establishments. The disposition of Site 9 (Block 353, Lot 44) will be subject to the express covenant and condition that, until a new facility for the Essex Street Market has been developed and is available for use as a market, Site 9 will continue to be restricted to market uses.
    [Show full text]
  • From 'The Projects' to a Sustainable Community: Re-Envisioning
    From ‘the projects’ to a sustainable community: Re-envisioning public housing in Lower East-side Manhattan by Mahammad Shamsuddin Momin From ‘the projects’ to a sustainable community: Re-envisioning public housing in Lower East-side Manhattan by Mahammad Shamsuddin Momin A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Urban Design in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in-charge: Professor Peter Bosselmann, Chair Professor John Lund Kriken Professor Malo Hutson Fall 2012 CONTENTS • Abstract .................................................................... i • Acknowledgement ................................................... ii 1. Introduction ........................................................... 1 2. Site Analysis ............................................................ 8 3. Case Studies ........................................................... 30 4. Design Program...................................................... 45 5. Urban Design Framework ..................................... 50 6. Compliance with Zoning Regulations .................. 57 7. Infill Scenarios ....................................................... 66 8. Connectivity ........................................................... 86 9. Accessibility and Green Infrastructure.................. 88 10. Social Integration .................................................. 92 11. Implementation ..................................................... 96 12. Conclusion ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EAST SIDE COASTAL RESILIENCY STUDIO FINAL REPORT MAY 2021 Pathway in East River Park
    EAST SIDE COASTAL RESILIENCY STUDIO FINAL REPORT MAY 2021 Pathway in East River Park. EV Grieve EAST SIDE COASTAL RESILIENCY STUDIO TEAM FACULTY ADVISOR Francesca Bruce Professor Lily Pollans Christopher Freire Tess Guttieres Tomas Izarra CLIENT Priya Mulgaonkar East River Park Action (ERPA) Colin Ryan Erica Saunders Lynne Siringo Sean Sonnemann Andrew Wasserman Report Layout Priya Mulgaonkar & Sean Sonnemann Process Timeline Graphic Tess Guttieres & Colin Ryan Cover Photos: ESCR Rendering, NYC New York City Department of Design & Construction Protest at East River Park, ERPA Sandy-related flooding along FDR and East River, Beth Carey, WikiCommons FALL 2020-SPRING 2021 3 EAST SIDE COASTAL RESILIENCY STUDIO TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 Executive Summary 6 Introduction 12 Project Goals & Research 14 Objectives & Methods 17 ESCR Process Timeline 20 Community Concerns & Critical Viewpoints 26 Planning Analysis: What Went Wrong 34 Recommendations 46 Appendix 4 HUNTER COLLEGE MUP - ESCR STUDIO Executive Summary The East Side Coastal Resiliency Project (ESCR) is a resiliency initiative undertaken by New York City that aims to protect the East Side of Manhattan from flood risk and sea level rise. The ESCR project area spans from Montgomery Street to East 15th Street and includes our Studio’s area of focus, East River Park. Working on behalf of East River Park Action (ERPA) over the past two semesters, our Studio has sought to understand the shortcomings of the ESCR Plan at present, as they relate to the initial community engagement efforts and the threats of climate change and COVID-19. Further, we aim to identify how our findings might be leveraged in the best interest of affected communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of State Senator Daniel Squadron Regarding the Draft Annual Plan 2013 for the New York City Housing Authority, July 25, 2012
    RANKING MEMBER INVESTIGATIONS AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS THE SENATE SOCIAL SERVICES DANIEL SQUADRON STATE OF NEW YORK COMMITTEES SENATOR, 25TH DISTRICT CODES CONSUMER PROTECTION CORPORATIONS, AUTHORITIES & COMMISSIONS FINANCE JUDICIARY TRANSPORTATION TESTIMONY OF STATE SENATOR DANIEL SQUADRON REGARDING THE DRAFT ANNUAL PLAN 2013 FOR THE NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, JULY 25, 2012. My name is Daniel Squadron and I represent the 25th Senate District in the New York State Senate. My district includes the Brooklyn neighborhoods of Greenpoint, Williamsburg, Vinegar Hill, Fulton Ferry, Brooklyn Heights, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens and Gowanus, and the Manhattan neighborhoods of Tribeca, Battery Park City, the Lower East Side, Chinatown, the Financial District, Little Italy, SoHo and the East Village. Thank you for the opportunity to testify at this hearing. Among the New Yorkers that I represent are the residents of 24 New York City Housing Authority Developments, spanning the Lower East Side, East Village, Willamsburg, and Chinatown. The Manhattan part of my district includes the Bernard Baruch Houses, Marianna Bracetti Houses, Pedro Albizu Campos, East 4th Street Rehab, First Houses, Samuel Gompers Houses, Rafael Hernandez Houses, Fiorello H. LaGuardia Houses, Lower East Side I, II, and III, Lower East Side Rehab, Max Meltzer Tower, Jacob Riis Houses, Henry Rutgers Houses, Seward Park Extension, Alfred E. Smith Houses, Two Bridges, Vladeck Houses, Lillian Wald Houses, and 45 Allen Street. In Brooklyn, I represent three developments: the Taylor Street-Wythe Avenue Houses, Williams Plaza, and Independence Towers. My constituents experience firsthand the challenges described by the New York City Alliance to Preserve Public Housing, and that is why I generally support the recommendations listed in the Alliance’s NYCHA FY 2013 Draft Annual Plan Position Statement.
    [Show full text]