DOCSLIB.ORG

Scientists in Support of Agricultural Biotechnology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Scientists In Support Of Agricultural Biotechnology We, the undersigned members of the scientific community, believe that recombinant DNA techniques constitute powerful and safe means for the modification of organisms and can contribute substantially in enhancing quality of life by improving agriculture, health care, and the environment. The responsible genetic modification of plants is neither new nor dangerous. Many characteristics, such as pest and disease resistance, have been routinely introduced into crop plants by traditional methods of sexual reproduction or cell culture procedures. The addition of new or different genes into an organism by recombinant DNA techniques does not inherently pose new or heightened risks relative to the modification of organisms by more traditional methods, and the relative safety of marketed products is further ensured by current regulations intended to safeguard the food supply. The novel genetic tools offer greater flexibility and precision in the modification of crop plants. No food products, whether produced with recombinant DNA techniques or with more traditional methods, are totally without risk. The risks posed by foods are a function of the biological characteristics of those foods and the specific genes that have been used, not of the processes employed in their development. Our goal as scientists is to ensure that any new foods produced from recombinant DNA are as safe or safer than foods already being consumed. Current methods of regulation and development have worked well. Recombinant DNA techniques have already been used to develop 'environmentally-friendly' crop plants with traits that preserve yields and allow farmers to reduce their use of synthetic pesticides and herbicides. The next generation of products promises to provide even greater benefits to consumers, such as enhanced nutrition, healthier oils, enhanced vitamin content, longer shelf life and improved medicines. Through judicious deployment, biotechnology can also address environmental degradation, hunger, and poverty in the developing world by providing improved agricultural productivity and greater nutritional security. Scientists at the international agricultural centers, universities, public research institutions, and elsewhere are already experimenting with products intended specifically for use in the developing world. We hereby express our support for the use of recombinant DNA as a potent tool for the achievement of a productive and sustainable agricultural system. We also urge policy makers to use sound scientific principles in the regulation of products produced with recombinant DNA, and to base evaluations of those products upon the characteristics of those products, rather than on the processes used in their development. ID Name Position Organization Department Degree Microbial and Molecular Bachelor's 1 Noelle Aardema Research biologist Pharmacia Biology degree North Carolina State 2 Jorge Abad Research Associate PhD Plant Pathology Ph.D. University 3 David Abbott Dr. CSIRO (Australia) Plant Pathology Ph.D. Grain Processing 4 David W. Abbott Senior Vice President Research & Development Ph.D. Corporation None 5 Nazmi Acikgöz Prof. Dr. Ege University Seed Technology Center Indicated DuPont Agricultural 6 Ed Adams Issues Manager None Indicated Ph.D. Enterprise Technology Bachelor's 7 Craig Adams Monsanto Company Dairy Specialist-Manufacturing degree 8 Tom Adams Site Leader Monsanto Mystic Research Ph.D. Universite Catholique de 9 Spiros N. Agathos Professor & Head Bioengineering Ph.D. Louvain Royal Veterinary and Research assistant 10 Niels Agerbirk Agricultural University, Chemistry Department Ph.D. professor Denmark 11 Byung Joon Ahn Professor Dankook University Ornamental Horticulture Ph.D. Chungnam National Dept. of Agronomy, 12 Sang-Nag Ahn Professor Ph.D. University College of Agriculture Master's 13 Jeffrey Ahrens Research Scientist Monsanto Yield Enhancement Degree Licensing & Technology 14 Vahid L. Aidun Manager Novartis Seeds, Inc Ph.D. Transfer Indian Institute of 15 Vani Akella Senior Scientist Division of Biotechnology Ph.D. Horticultural Research Master's 16 Marjon Akerboom None Indicated None Indicated None Indicated degree 17 C. Akula Post-Doctoral Wisconsin University Agronomy Ph.D. Molecular Biology Master's 18 Lee D. Albee II Monsanto Ag Regulatory Analyst Degree 19 Henrik H. Albert Plant Physiologist None Indicated None Indicated Ph.D. head, Experimental 20 Saverio Alberti Istituto Mario Negri Sud Cell Biology and Oncology M.D. Oncology Bachelor's 21 Joseph R. Alberts Student University of Michigan None Indicated Degree Pioneer Hi-Bred Research and 22 Bruno Albrecht Research Coordinator Ph.D. International Development None 23 Esteban Alcalde Responsible R & D Novartis Seeds Field Crops Indicated 24 Herb S. Aldwinckle Professor Cornell University Plant Pathology Ph.D. 25 Danny Alexander Senior Staff Scientist Novartis Biotecnology None Indicated Ph.D. Bachelor's 26 Bruce Alleman Molecular Scientist Monsanto Molecular Breeding Degree Biological Sciences / Plant 27 Randy D. Allen Professor Texas Tech University Ph.D. & Soil Sciences Southern Research Cell Biology and 28 Alex Aller Director Ph.D. Institute Immunology University of the West Biological and Chemical 29 Angela T Alleyne M.Sc. M.Phil Indies Sciences Master's 30 Daniel J. Altier Research Associate None Indicated None Indicated Degree International Association of 31 David W. Altman Secretary Plant Cell Tissue Culture None Indicated Ph.D. and Biotechnology The Hebrew University of Agricultural Plant 32 Arie Altman Professor and Chair Ph.D. Jerusalem Sciences Servicio de Investigación Tecnología en Producción 33 José Mª Alvarez Researcher Ph.D. Agraria (DGA) Vegetal College of Tropical Professor, Plant 34 Anne Alvarez University of Hawaii Agriculture and Human Ph.D. Pathology Resources Ariel Cinvestav, IPN Irapuato, 35 Principal Scientist Plant Genetic Engineering Ph.D. Alvarez-Morales Mexico 36 Bruce Ames Professor Univ. Calif. Berkeley None Indicated Ph.D. 37 Charles An Scientist Paradigm Genetics,Inc. Plant Research Ph.D. 38 Ajith Anand Research Associate Kansas State University Biochemistry Ph.D. Agriculture Research North Carolina State 39 Osama Anas Plant Pathology Ph.D. Specialist/Dr. University Bachelor's 40 Jerry Anderson Analytical Biochemist None Indicated None Indicated Degree Bachelor's 41 David Anderson None indicated University of Queensland Botany Degree Michael P. 42 Associate Professor None Indicated Plant and Soil Sciences Ph.D. Anderson Director, Quality Traits Pioneer Hi-Bred 43 Paul C. Anderson None Indicated Ph.D. Research International 44 Olin Anderson Research Geneticist None Indicated None Indicated Ph.D. 45 Solange Andrade Researcher EMBRAPA-Cerrados None Indicated M.D. Bachelor's 46 Kenneth Andrews Biologist None Indicated IAGD Degree Daniel Agricultural and Biological 47 Associate Professor Cornell University Ph.D. Aneshansley Engineering Mingo-Castel, Catedratico (Full Universidad Publica de Produccion Agraria (Ag None 48 Angel Professor) Navarra Production) Indicated 49 Fernando Angel Molecular Biologist Cenicana Biotechnology Ph.D. 50 Geert Angenon Project Leader VIB/University Ghent Plant Genetics Ph.D. 51 Misha Angrist Industry Analyst None Indicated Life Sciences Ph.D. Manuel Sanchez Profesor Ayudante de Universidad Miguel 52 Division de Microbiologia Ph.D. Angulo Universidad Hernandez 53 S.K. Anitha None Indicated None Indicated Ph.D. Institute for Biotechnology 54 Heidrun Anke Vice Director None Indicated Ph.D. and Drug Research Head of Crop Research and 55 Vivienne Anthony Zeneca Plant Science Ph.D. Enhancement Development Gabriela The Pennsylvania State Bachelor's 56 Graduate Student Integrative Bioscience Antunez-de-Mayolo University Degree Global Marketing 57 Josef Appel Project Manager BASF AG Germany Ph.D. Fungicides 58 Nestor R. Apuya Scientist Ceres, Inc. None Indicated Ph.D. 59 Pere Ar(tm)s Researcher IRTA Plant Genetics Ph.D. Francisco J. L. Embrapa Rec. Geneticos e Gene Transfer and 60 Dr. Ph.D. Aragao Biotecnologia Expression Lab. LTG Research Associate 61 Prakash R. Arelli University of Missouri Agronomy Ph.D. Professor Research Associate 62 Prakash Arelli University of Missouri Agronomy Ph.D. Professor Barley Germplasm 63 Gerardo Arias EMBRAPA TRIGO Ph.D. Project Leader None 64 Toni Armstrong Scientist/Team Leader Monsanto None Indicated Indicated Ecological Technology 65 Tom Armstrong Field Biologist Monsanto Company Ph.D. Center 66 Paul Arnison General Manager FAAR Biotechnology None Indicated Ph.D. Boyce Thompson Institute 67 Charles J. Arntzen President/CEO None Indicated Ph.D. for Plant Research, Inc. 68 Einsele Arthur Ph.D. in agronomics Novartis Seeds None Indicated Ph.D. Rodrigo Biosafety Research Quinaxi Institute of 69 None Indicated Ph.D. Artunduaga-Salas Unit's Head Sustainable Development Food Science and Human 70 William E. Artz Associate Professor University of Illinois Ph.D. Nutrition Aru K. Research Associate University of Nebraska - 71 Center for Biotechnology Ph.D. Arumuganathan professor Lincoln Faculty of Veterinary Animal Prtoduction and 72 Miguel A. Asensio Prof. Food Hygiene Sciences, University of Ph.D. Food Science Extremadura Certified Professional 73 Cynthia L. Ash None Indicated None Indicated Ph.D. Plant Pathologist Director, Product Safety 74 James D. Astwood Monsanto Ag Sector Ph.D. Center Jose Luis Galan 75 Biologist IATA-CSIC Biotechnology B.A./B.C. Asuncion Indian Institute of Dr. Chenna Reddy 76 Scientist Horticultural Research, Ornamental
Recommended publications
  • TRIPS and MONOPOLIES on SEEDS and MEDICINES Vandana

    TRIPS and MONOPOLIES on SEEDS and MEDICINES Vandana

    295 PROFITEERING FROM DEATH: TRIPS AND MONOPOLIES ON SEEDS AND MEDICINES Vandana Shiva 1 1 WTO AND THE TRIPS AGREEMENT The Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights Agreement of WTO is the most far reaching in terms of creating corporate rights and corporate monopolies. During the Uruguay Round of the GATT, the United States introduced its flawed patent system into the WTO, and thus imposed it on the rest of the world. US Corporations have admitted that they drafted and lobbied on behalf of TRIPs. As a Monsanto spokesman said, “The industries and traders of world commerce have played simultaneously the role of patients, the diagnosticians, and prescribing physicians.” TRIPs not only made Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) laws global geographically, but also removed ethical boundaries by including life forms and biodiversity into patentable subject matter. Living organisms and life forms that are self-creating were thus redefined as machines and artifacts made and invented by the patentee. Intellectual property rights and patents then give the patent holder a monopolistic right to prevent others from making, using, or selling seeds. Seed saving by farmers has now been redefined from a sacred duty to a criminal offence of stealing “property”. Article 27.3 (b) of the TRIPs agreement, which relates to patents on living resources, was basically pushed by the “Life Science” companies to establish themselves as Lords of Life. The chemical companies of the world have bought up seed and biotechnology companies and reorganized themselves as Life Science corporations, claiming patents on genes, seeds, plants and animals. Ciba Geigy and Sandoz have combined to form Novartis, Hoechst has joined with Rhone 1 Phd in the Philosophy of Science (1978) , Right Livelihood Award (1993), director of the Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology, New Delhi, India.
  • A Global Citizens Report on the State of Gmos Synthesis Report !"#$%&'$#&(#)')$ "*+$,'$-.'!"#+

    A Global Citizens Report on the State of Gmos Synthesis Report !"#$%&'$#&(#)')$ "*+$,'$-.'!"#+

    !"#$%&'$#&(#)')$ "*+$,'$-.'!"#+ Published by A Global Citizens Report on the State of GMOs Synthesis Report !"#$%&'$#&(#)')$ "*+$,'$-.'!"#+ !"#$%&'$"()*)+,-."/,0%1*" %-"*2,"3*'*,"%4"#56."7 8'$.,"91%:).,.;"8')$,<"=,>2-%$%?),. 3@-*2,.)."/,0%1* Coordinated by Vandana Shiva, Navdanya Debbie Barker, Centre for Food Safety Caroline Lockhart, Navdanya International Front page cartoon: Sergio Staino Layout, production and printing: SICREA srl, Florence Contact: [email protected] Available for download at www.navdanyainternational.it www.navdanya.org Thanks go to all those who readily contributed in the realization of this report, particularly Sergio Staino, creator of the cover cartoon, Maurizio Izzo of Sicrea for production and Massimo Orlandi for press and communications. Thanks also go to Christina Stafford and interns Tara McNerney and Tanvi Gadhia of Center for Food Safety (CFS) and Sulakshana Fontana, Elena Bellini and Filippo Cimo of Navdanya International for their diligent coordination, editing and translation efforts. Final thanks also go to Giannozzo Pucci, Maria Grazia Mammuccini and Natale Bazzanti for their cooperation and assistance in realizing this report. This publication is printed on ecological paper SYMBOL FREELIFE SATIN ECF *$%/012/$-3435678$)690:4$ 07$4;6$+4246$0<$%&'8$=$ >2/86$(:0?3868@$>23/6A$!6B;70/0C368 Coordinated by Navdanya and Navdanya International, the International Commission on the Future of Food and Agriculture, with the participation of The Center for Food Safety (CFS) Contributing organizations:
  • Protecting and Promoting Traditional Knowledge: Systems, National Experiences and International Dimensions

    Protecting and Promoting Traditional Knowledge: Systems, National Experiences and International Dimensions

    United Nations Conference on Trade and Development PROTECTING AND PROMOTING TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE: SYSTEMS, NATIONAL EXPERIENCES AND INTERNATIONAL DIMENSIONS Sophia Twarog and Promila Kapoor, Editors UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2004 i Note Symbols of the United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the UNCTAD secretariat. Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is re- quested, together with a reference to the document number. A copy of the publication contain- ing the quotation or reprint should be sent to the UNCTAD secretariat (c/o Administrative Secretary, Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities, Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland). Cover photo by Jean Philippe Soule courtesy of www.nativeplanet.org UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Symbol No. UNCTAD/DITC/TED/10 ISSN: 1812-7061 Copyright © United Nations, 2004 All rights reserved ii Foreword The preservation, protection and promotion of the traditional knowledge, innovations and prac- tices of local and indigenous communities (TK) is of key importance for developing countries. Their rich endowment of TK and biodiversity plays a critical role in their health care, food security, culture, religion, identity, environment, sustainable development and trade.
  • Preparing for Future Products of Biotechnology

    Preparing for Future Products of Biotechnology

    THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/24605 SHARE Preparing for Future Products of Biotechnology DETAILS 230 pages | 7 x 10 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-45205-2 | DOI 10.17226/24605 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK Committee on Future Biotechnology Products and Opportunities to Enhance Capabilities of the Biotechnology Regulatory System; Board on Life Sciences; Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources; Board on Chemical Sciences and FIND RELATED TITLES Technology; Division on Earth and Life Studies; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Preparing for Future Products of Biotechnology Preparing for Future Products of Biotechnology Committee on Future Biotechnology Products and Opportunities to Enhance Capabilities of the Biotechnology Regulatory System Board on Life Sciences Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology Division on Earth and Life Studies A Report of Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Preparing for Future Products of Biotechnology THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 This activity was supported by Contract No.
  • 18-19 April 1944 FRENCH RAILWAY YARDS 20-21 April 1944 VARIOUS

    18-19 April 1944 FRENCH RAILWAY YARDS 20-21 April 1944 VARIOUS

    Fw. Alfred Rauer: 4 3./NJG1 Lancaster 3 km W. Geel, 42 km E. Antwerpen (Gemse): 5.000 m. 23.02 61 Sqn Lancaster JA695 Meanwhile, in the north, the I. Jagdkorps reacted in force against a major Gardening operation by 168 ‘heavies’ to Swinemünde, Kiel Bay, and the Danish coast. At a very early hour, starting at 21.38 hrs, small elements of NJG3 plus several Gruppen of NJG1, 2 Fw. Lorenz Gerstmayr: 10 4./NJG3 4-mot NW Aachen: 6.100 m. 23.03 Aachen raid, unidentified. and 5 were scrambled and, whilst being told that ‘Flak has been warned’ and ‘the bombers are still far away to the west’, these were Note: victory confirmed on 19.8.1944 first gathered over FF Quelle and later over FF’s Philipp and Ludwig. This potent fighter force, however, was never released against the mine-layers, probably because their controllers were expecting a threat against a German city to develop. Those Nachtjäger of Fw. Lorenz Gerstmayr: 11 4./NJG3 4-mot NW Aachen: 6.000 m. 23.07 619 Sqn Lancaster LL784 NJG3 and 5 that were milling over Philipp, for example, were repeatedly told to remain there, whilst receiving intermittent plots on the Oblt. H.-Wolfgang Schnaufer: 51 Stab IV./NJG1 Lancaster near Beerse, 6 km W. Turnhout: 5.300 m. 23.15 83 Sqn Lancaster ND389 Gardening force. At 00.33 hrs, these fighters were finally given landing orders. Uffz. Hans Fischer: 2 12./NJG1 Lancaster 10 km W. Roermond: 5.600 m. 23.15 514 Sqn Lancaster LL639 As the Gardeners’ approached the Danish coast (crossing in over Westerland), some ten Bf110 G-4 crews of IV./NJG3 were Note: also claimed by Flak of 3.-6./schw.
  • Transgénicos: El Prontuario Criminal De Monsanto Por Fernando Glenza

    Transgénicos: El Prontuario Criminal De Monsanto Por Fernando Glenza

    Transgénicos: El prontuario criminal de Monsanto Por Fernando Glenza Agencia Prensa Mercosur Una reciente resolución de las autoridades científicas de Argentina invita a recordar la historia negra de esta transnacional norteamericana que atenta contra el medio ambiente y la vida. Monsanto se presenta a sí misma como una empresa visionaria, una fuerza de la historia mundial que trabaja para aportar ciencia de vanguardia y una actitud ambientalmente responsable a la solución de los problemas más urgentes de la humanidad. Pero, ¿qué es en realidad Monsanto? ¿Cuál es su origen? ¿Cómo llegó a ser el segundo productor mundial de agroquímicos y uno de los principales proveedores de semillas en el planeta?. ¿Es Monsanto la compañía "limpia y verde" que proclaman sus anuncios, o los mismos apenas representan una operación de imagen que oculta la naturaleza criminal de la compañía? En una Resolución del 13 de diciembre de 2004, el Comité Nacional de Etica en la Ciencia y la Tecnología (CECTE), dependiente del Ministerio de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología de Argentina, tomó conocimiento de la convocatoria al Premio "Animarse a Emprender", instituido por el Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas, Educativas y Técnicas (CONICET) y la empresa Monsanto, que otorgaba 30 mil dólares al mejor proyecto en el área de biotecnología y medio ambiente, y recogió las inquietudes formuladas sobre este premio por algunos investigadores. En atención a esas consideraciones, el CECTE estimó que es "inconveniente" que una institución pública de la ciencia y la tecnología se asocie en el otorgamiento de premios a la investigación científica o tecnológica con organizaciones o empresas que "son objeto de cuestionamientos éticos por sus responsabilidades y acciones concretas en detrimento del bienestar general y el medioambiente".
  • Monsantos Harvest of Fear

    Monsantos Harvest of Fear

    Monsanto's Harvest of Fear | Politics | Vanity Fair http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/monsanto200805?pri... I NVESTI GATI ON Monsanto already dominates America’s food chain with its genetically modified seeds. Now it has targeted milk production. Just as frightening as the corporation’s tactics–ruthless legal battles against small farmers–is its decades-long history of toxic contamination. BY DONALD L. BARLETT AND JAMES B. STEELE MAY 2008 No thanks: An anti-Monsanto crop circle made by farmers and volunteers in the Philippines. By Melvyn Calderon/Greenpeace HO/A.P. Images. Gary Rinehart clearly remembers the summer day in 2002 when the stranger walked in and issued his threat. Rinehart was behind the counter of the Square Deal, his “old-time country store,” as he calls it, on the fading town square of Eagleville, Missouri, a tiny farm community 100 miles north of Kansas City. The Square Deal is a fixture in Eagleville, a place where farmers and townspeople can go for lightbulbs, greeting cards, hunting gear, ice cream, aspirin, and dozens of other small items without having to drive to a big-box store in Bethany, the county seat, 15 miles down Interstate 35. Everyone knows Rinehart, who was born and raised in the area and runs one of Eagleville’s few surviving businesses. The stranger came up to the counter and asked for him by name. 1 of 19 4/18/2010 9:28 PM Monsanto's Harvest of Fear | Politics | Vanity Fair http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/monsanto200805?pri... “Well, that’s me,” said Rinehart.
  • Jane Shen-Miller Food Innovation Fellowships Prize

    Jane Shen-Miller Food Innovation Fellowships Prize

    November/December 2019 • Volume 46, Number 6 p. 13 p. 15 p. 17 Leon Kochian ASPB Members Where Are They Receives Receive HHMI Now? International Hanna Gray Jane Shen-Miller Food Innovation Fellowships Prize THE NEWSLETTER OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PLANT BIOLOGISTS President’s Letter The Transparency Project BY JUDY CALLIS ASPB President, University of California, Davis he word transparent has multiple mean- ings. For us scientists, we might first Tthink of a solution in a tube or vial be- ing transparent, defined by Merriam-Webster Blake Meyers as “having the property of transmitting light without appreciable scattering so that bodies Appointed Next lying beyond are seen clearly” (https://www. merriam-webster.com/dictionary/transpar- Editor of ent). As in, did your chemical dissolve? But the The Plant Cell transparency to which I refer is the second set of definitions in the dictionary: “free from pre- tense or deceit,” “readily understood,” and most relevant for this letter, “characterized by vis- SPB is pleased to announce the ap- ibility or accessibility of information especially pointment of Blake C. Meyers as concerning business practices.” editor-in-chief of The Plant Cell be- A ASPB is an active and multifaceted orga- ginning January 1, 2020. The Plant Cell pub- nization with diverse activities including lishes novel research of particular significance outreach, professional development, publish- in plant biology, especially in the areas of ing, and advocacy, among others. Because of well. In the fall of 2015, the main leadership cellular biology, molecular biology, genetics, these various endeavors, understanding how committee, previously called the Executive development, and evolution.
  • Strategic Report for Monsanto Company

    Strategic Report for Monsanto Company

    Strategic Report for Monsanto Company Kevin Yamazaki Anastasia Dialynas Jed Cullen April 7, 2010 Monsanto Company Table of Contents Executive Summary................................................................................................... 3 Company History ....................................................................................................... 5 Monsanto’s Beginnings (1901-1960)........................................................................ 5 The Birth of Monsanto’s Agricultural Division (1960-1997) ...................................... 5 The ‘New’ Monsanto (1997-2009) ............................................................................ 7 Competitive Analysis................................................................................................. 9 Internal Rivalry........................................................................................................ 10 Entry Threat............................................................................................................ 12 Buyer Power........................................................................................................... 14 Supplier Power ....................................................................................................... 16 Substitutes.............................................................................................................. 17 Complements ......................................................................................................... 21 Financial Analysis...................................................................................................
  • MODEL PESTICIDE REDUCTION PLAN November 1996

    MODEL PESTICIDE REDUCTION PLAN November 1996

    MODEL PESTICIDE REDUCTION PLAN November 1996 Developed By: THE AIR FORCE CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DIRECTORATE AFCEE/EQ 3207 North Road Brooks Air Force Base, Texas 78235-5363 Prepared by: EARTH TECH, Inc. Prepared For: Department of the Air Force Air Force Materiel Command Through the Contracting Offices of: Department of the Air Force Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence Contract No F41624-94-D-8138 Delivery Order No. 12 1 November 1996/text.doc Model Pesticide Reduction Plan 1 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1 November 1996/text.doc Model Pesticide Reduction Plan 2 PREFACE BACKGROUND This Air Force Model Pesticide Reduction Plan can aid you in reducing the amount of pesticides used at your installation and help you meet the Department of Defense (DoD) goal for reduction in pesticide usage. This DoD goal requires all installations to reduce their pesticide usage by 50 percent by the year 2000. The intent of this program is to reduce human exposure to pesticides and to reduce environmental impacts caused by pesticides usage. The following Air Force personnel provided significant contributions to the development of this Model Pesticide Reduction Plan: Wayne Fordham, Air Force Pest Management Program Coordinator, HQ AFCESA/CESM Michael Cornelius, HQ AFMC Command Entomologist, HQ AFMC/CEVC Terri Lucas, Wright-Patterson AFB Environmental Flight, 88ABW/EME Michael Clawson, Initial Project Manager for this Model Pesticide Reduction Plan, HQ AFCEE/EP The Model Pesticide Reduction Plan is designed to supplement a base’s existing Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Program by providing pesticide reduction alternatives in addition to those that are a part of an effective IPM program.
  • 21. Januar 1944

    21. Januar 1944

    Nacht 20. - 21. Januar 1944 Operationen RAF Bomber Command 495 Lancaster, 264 Halifax und 10 Mosquito s starten in England zu einem weiteren Angriff auf die „Big City“ Berlin. 22 Halifax und 13 Lancaster müssen für diesen Raid geopfert werden . In Berlin sterben 335 Menschen, 613 erleiden Verwundungen. 20.938 Personen werden obdachlos. 4 Menschen bleiben ver misst (Hauptluftschutzstelle - endgültige Feststellung vom 17. 0 2. 19 44) 12 Mosquito s nach Düsseldorf, 4 nach Kiel und 3 nach Hannover. 29 Flugzeuge Verminung Seegebiete vor französischen Häfen - keine Verluste . Operationen RAF 205 Group 48 Wellington bombardieren in zwei Wellen Eisenbahneinrichtungen bei Cecina - Italien . K eine Verluste . Operationen Deutsche Nachtjagd Um 17.09 Uhr meldet d as deutsche Radarschiff „Togo“ vor der holländischen Küste , den Anflug eines feindlichen Kampfverbandes. Aufgrund von extremen „Schlechtwetter“ können zunächst nur die erfahrensten deutschen Besatzungen des 1. Jagdkorps zur Abwehr des britischen Bomberstroms starten. Etwa 10 Viermot orige werden auf dem Hinflug zum Angriffziel Berlin von den Nachtjägern abgeschossen. Über der Reichshaupstadt selbst finden sich etwa 100 zweimotorige und 70 einmotorige Nachtjäger zur Abwehr ein. Im Großraum Berlin gelingt es den deutschen Jägern, etwa 20 Feindbomber abzuschiessen. Jäg er der 3. JD verfolgen die britischen Bomber auf dem Rückweg und erzielen weitere Abschusserfolge . Abschussmeldungen Luftwaffe Nachtjagd Dienstgrad / Name Einheit Typ Ort / Raum Zeit Oberfeldwebel Berschwinger 4 ./ NJG 2 Halifax * - - - - 1 8.56 Oberfeldwebel Berschwinger 4 ./ NJG 2 Halifax * - - - - 1 9.10 Major Prinz zu Sayn - Wittgenstein Stab NJG 2 Halifax * Anflug nach Berlin - D eutschland 19.10 - 19.20 Major Prinz zu Sayn - Wittgenstein Stab NJG 2 Halifax * Anflug nach Berlin - Deutschland 19.15 - 19.35 Unteroffizier Handing 10 ./ NJG 5 Hal/Lanc * - - - - 1 9.19 Unteroffizier Zawadka 4 ./ NJG 5 Halifax * - - - - 1 9.19 - 19.45 Oberleutnant Meister 1 ./ NJG 4 Lancaster * 2 Km südlich Liebenwalde - D.
  • 25. Februar 1944

    25. Februar 1944

    Na cht 24. - 25. Februar 1944 Operationen RAF Bomber Command 554 Lanc aster, 169 Halifax und 11 Mosquito s , zusammen 734 Kampfflugzeuge , bom b ardieren die Stadt Schweinfurt in Bayern. Zum ersten Mal wendet „ Bomber Command “ eine neu e Taktik an : 392 Flugzeuge starten in einer ersten Angriffswelle, die zweite Welle mit 342 Bomber n greift 2 Stunden später an. Beide Angriffsformationen zusammen verli eren 33 Flugzeuge . 1 83 Übungsflugzeuge fliegen einen Täuschungsangriff (D iversionary S weep) über der Nordsee. 60 Halifax und 50 Stirling verminen die Kieler Bucht und das Kattegat. Da bei gehen 2 Stirling verloren. 15 Mosquito s greifen Flugplätze der Luftwaffe in Holland an. 8 Mosquito s nach Kiel und 7 nach Aachen. 12 „Serrate - Patrols “ - 1 Mosquito kehrt hierbei nicht zurück. 5 Wellington s Verminung Küstengewässer vor Lorient – Frankr eich . K eine Verluste. Operationen RAF 205 Group 205 Group sendet 56 Flugzeuge zum Angriff auf das ( „ Pointblank - Target” ) Daimler - Puch Werk in Steyr . 6 Wellin gton s gehen verloren. Obwohl das Wetter über dem Zielgebiet als gut bezeichnet werden kann, befin den sich die meisten Flugzeuge beim Bombenwurf nicht über Steyr, sondern über Vöcklabruck . Operationen Luftwaffe - Nachtjagd Der Täuschungsangriff der Englän der ü ber der Nordsee veranlasst die deutschen Jägerleitoffiziere 209 ein - und zweimotorige Nachtj äger etwa 2 Stunden vor dem eigentlichen Hauptangriff der Briten auf Schweinfurt , in den Nachthimmel hinein starten zu lassen. Die Masse der deutschen Jäger ve rsamm elt sich nördlich Bremen und Hamburg , um den vermeintlich herannahenden Feind zu empfangen. Als die erste Welle der englischen Feindbomber, diesmal die tatsächliche Angriffsformation, die französische Küste überquert, versammeln Jägerleitoffiziere die sich in der Luft befindlichen deutschen Jäger nahe dem Funkfeuer Kuli (Raum Trier).