DOCSLIB.ORG

Recording and Management of Byzantine and Post Byzantine Monuments in Central Messenia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recording and Management of Byzantine and Post Byzantine Monuments in Central Messenia UNIVERSITY OF THE PELOPONNESE NIKOLAOS PANAGOPOULOS (R.N. 1012201702005) DIPLOMA THESIS: RECORDING AND MANAGEMENT OF BYZANTINE AND POST BYZANTINE MONUMENTS IN CENTRAL MESSENIA SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: - Prof. Zacharias Nikos - Ass. Prof. Xanthopoulou Maria EXAMINATION COMMITTEE: - Prof. Zacharias Nikos - Ass. Prof. Xanthopoulou Maria - Dr. Militsi – Kechagia Evangelia ΚΑLΑΜΑΤΑ, JANUARY 2019 Abstract The first Christian community was spotted in Messenia in Koroni, with the foundation of a large early Christian basilica dated back at the 5th century. From this time began the period of christianization of the population. In this thesis the Byzantine churches of the area north of the village of Androusa till the village of Polixni will be presented and examined. Twenty-nine (29) Byzantine and Post Byzantine monuments will be presented. An analytical review of the architecture, history and chronology is given, based on references information, while the problems and solutions for their management wil be presented. The reason for the selection of this study area is, because it was spotted a lack of references information and archaeological research in this specific region. The scope of this thesis is to record, detect, analyze and recognize the problems, and give solutions concerning the Byzantine monuments. At the beginning of the thesis the historical frame will be given focused mainly in the Byzantine periods. Then, the Byzantine churches will be analyzed. Most of the monuments were visited and an approach of the problems of the monuments will be given, in order to extract possible solutions for the management and preservation of the monuments based on new technologies. The study area has a high number of important Byzantine churches, both known and unknown to the scientific community. Further investigation for the preservation and protection of the sites is necessary for the Byzantine Heritage of Messenia. 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor Professor of the University of Peloponnese, Zacharias Nikos for his assistance and guidance during this thesis. Also, I would like to thank the member of the examination committee for their support, Ass. Prof. Xanthopoulou Maria and the Dr. Militsi – Kechagia Evangelia. Lastly, I would like to thank my family for their support during my studies. 2 Contents Chapter 1 ................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 7 Chapter 2 ................................................................................................................................................. 8 2.1. Historical Frame of Messenia ........................................................................................................... 8 2.2. Early Christianity in Messenia .................................................................................................... 9 2.3. Transitional Period ......................................................................................................................... 11 2.4. Middle Byzantine Period in Messenia ............................................................................................ 12 2.5. Late Byzantine Period in Messenia ................................................................................................ 14 2.6. Post Byzantine Period in Messenia ................................................................................................ 17 Chapter 3 ............................................................................................................................................... 20 3.0. Byzantine Monuments, Churches of Messenia ......................................................................... 20 3.1. Early Byzantine Period in Messenia .......................................................................................... 20 3.2. Transitional Period .................................................................................................................... 20 3.2.1 Early Christian Churches in Messenia of 5th -6th and Transitional period of 7th -8th centuries .... 21 3.2.1.1. Basilica of Ancient Messene .................................................................................................... 21 3.2.1.2 Basilica of the Theatre ........................................................................................................... 21 3.2.1.3 Settlements in Ancient Messene ................................................................................................ 22 3.3. Middle Byzantine Period ........................................................................................................... 22 3.3.1. Middle Byzantine Churches of 10th- 11th centuries ............................................................... 23 3.3.2. Klisa Koukie Mauromatiou ................................................................................................... 23 3.3.3. Klisa Porti Mauromatiou ....................................................................................................... 23 3.3.4. Saint John Riganas of Ancient Messene ............................................................................... 23 3.4.5. Saint Nickolas of Ancient Messene ....................................................................................... 24 3.3.6. Saint Nickolas of Arsinoi ...................................................................................................... 24 3.3.7. Saint Nickolas Zerbisia ......................................................................................................... 24 3.3.8. Saint Constantine of Steniklaros (Alitourgi) ............................................................................... 24 3.3.9. Saint John of Steniklaros (Alitourgi) ..................................................................................... 25 3.3.10. Saint Athanasios of Steniklaros (Alitourgi) .............................................................................. 25 3.3.11.Panaitsa Steniklarou ................................................................................................................... 25 3.3.12. Taxiarxes Polixnis ..................................................................................................................... 25 3.3.13. Fonemeni (Faneromeni), Polixni .............................................................................................. 26 3.4.1. Middle Byzantine Churches of the 12th century .................................................................... 26 3.4.2. Panagitsa Valiras ................................................................................................................... 27 3.4.3. Zoodoxos Pigi, Samarina....................................................................................................... 27 3.4.4. Saint Athanasios of Kalirroi .................................................................................................. 28 3 3.4.5. Palaia Episkopi Androusas .................................................................................................... 28 3.5. Late Byzantine Period ............................................................................................................... 29 3.5.1. Late Byzantine Churches of the 13th-14th centuries ..................................................................... 30 3.5.2. Andromonastiro ........................................................................................................................... 30 3.5.3. Saint Lazarus near Andromonastiro Monastery .................................................................... 33 3.5.4. Saint Vlasios of Valyra .......................................................................................................... 33 3.5.5. Saint George of Androusa ..................................................................................................... 33 3.5.6. Saint Spyridon of Zerbisia ..................................................................................................... 34 3.5.7. Saint Aikaterini of Lampaina ................................................................................................ 34 3.5.8. Vraxopanaitsa ........................................................................................................................ 35 3.6. Post Byzantine Monasteries in Messenia .................................................................................. 35 3.6.1. Old Voulkano Monastery ...................................................................................................... 36 3.6.2. Frescos of the Katholikon, Iconographic Themes ................................................................. 36 3.6.3. New Voulkano Monastery ..................................................................................................... 41 3.6.4. Metoxia – Dependencies – Land of the Monastery ............................................................... 43 3.6.5. Taxiarxes of Meligalas .......................................................................................................... 43 Chapter 4 ............................................................................................................................................... 44 4.1. Proposals for Preservation and Management of Byzantine Monuments
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Genetics of the Peloponnesean Populations and the Theory of Extinction of the Medieval Peloponnesean Greeks
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2017) 25, 637–645 Official journal of The European Society of Human Genetics www.nature.com/ejhg ARTICLE Genetics of the peloponnesean populations and the theory of extinction of the medieval peloponnesean Greeks George Stamatoyannopoulos*,1, Aritra Bose2, Athanasios Teodosiadis3, Fotis Tsetsos2, Anna Plantinga4, Nikoletta Psatha5, Nikos Zogas6, Evangelia Yannaki6, Pierre Zalloua7, Kenneth K Kidd8, Brian L Browning4,9, John Stamatoyannopoulos3,10, Peristera Paschou11 and Petros Drineas2 Peloponnese has been one of the cradles of the Classical European civilization and an important contributor to the ancient European history. It has also been the subject of a controversy about the ancestry of its population. In a theory hotly debated by scholars for over 170 years, the German historian Jacob Philipp Fallmerayer proposed that the medieval Peloponneseans were totally extinguished by Slavic and Avar invaders and replaced by Slavic settlers during the 6th century CE. Here we use 2.5 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms to investigate the genetic structure of Peloponnesean populations in a sample of 241 individuals originating from all districts of the peninsula and to examine predictions of the theory of replacement of the medieval Peloponneseans by Slavs. We find considerable heterogeneity of Peloponnesean populations exemplified by genetically distinct subpopulations and by gene flow gradients within Peloponnese. By principal component analysis (PCA) and ADMIXTURE analysis the Peloponneseans are clearly distinguishable from the populations of the Slavic homeland and are very similar to Sicilians and Italians. Using a novel method of quantitative analysis of ADMIXTURE output we find that the Slavic ancestry of Peloponnesean subpopulations ranges from 0.2 to 14.4%.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 5 the Crossroads
    CHAPTER 5 The Crossroads An ancient traveler journeying to Corinth along the coastal road from Athens via Isthmia, or the road from Kenchreai, would have walked westward below the steep Ayios Dimitrios Ridge to the point where the ridge terminates and the principal roads meet near a series of limestone quarries (Figure 5.1). This place is the first point of convergence of the major roads from the east (Isthmia), southeast (Kenchreai), west (Corinth), and north (Lechaion Gulf). While the entire isthmus was a travel corridor of intersecting roads, the crossroads below the Ayios Dimitrios ridge is one of only several places on the Isthmus where so many roads from different directions intersect in the same location. As such, it was one of the most important structures of the Corinthian Isthmus.1 At the crossroads developed an important settlement of the Corinthia that has come to be known as “Kromna.” As James Wiseman argued in his overview of the site, Kromna emerged in the Archaic period but developed by the fifth/fourth century BC into an important town which, following the refoundation of Corinth as a colony, also had a significant Roman component. The Eastern Korinthia Archaeological Survey documented an extensive carpet of Archaic-Late Roman artifacts and features in the area that indicate buildings at the crossroads were even more extensive than Wiseman had estimated. For a traveler of the eastern Corinthia, the crossroads would have constituted one of the major nodes marking a passage to or from Corinth; and for the city itself, the area lay at the heart of its territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Mycenaean Arkadia: Space and Place(S) of an Inland and Mountainous Region
    Early Mycenaean Arkadia: Space and Place(s) of an Inland and Mountainous Region Eleni Salavoura1 Abstract: The concept of space is an abstract and sometimes a conventional term, but places – where people dwell, (inter)act and gain experiences – contribute decisively to the formation of the main characteristics and the identity of its residents. Arkadia, in the heart of the Peloponnese, is a landlocked country with small valleys and basins surrounded by high mountains, which, according to the ancient literature, offered to its inhabitants a hard and laborious life. Its rough terrain made Arkadia always a less attractive area for archaeological investigation. However, due to its position in the centre of the Peloponnese, Arkadia is an inevitable passage for anyone moving along or across the peninsula. The long life of small and medium-sized agrarian communities undoubtedly owes more to their foundation at crossroads connecting the inland with the Peloponnesian coast, than to their potential for economic growth based on the resources of the land. However, sites such as Analipsis, on its east-southeastern borders, the cemetery at Palaiokastro and the ash altar on Mount Lykaion, both in the southwest part of Arkadia, indicate that the area had a Bronze Age past, and raise many new questions. In this paper, I discuss the role of Arkadia in early Mycenaean times based on settlement patterns and excavation data, and I investigate the relation of these inland communities with high-ranking central places. In other words, this is an attempt to set place(s) into space, supporting the idea that the central region of the Peloponnese was a separated, but not isolated part of it, comprising regions that are also diversified among themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • DESERTMED a Project About the Deserted Islands of the Mediterranean
    DESERTMED A project about the deserted islands of the Mediterranean The islands, and all the more so the deserted island, is an extremely poor or weak notion from the point of view of geography. This is to it’s credit. The range of islands has no objective unity, and deserted islands have even less. The deserted island may indeed have extremely poor soil. Deserted, the is- land may be a desert, but not necessarily. The real desert is uninhabited only insofar as it presents no conditions that by rights would make life possible, weather vegetable, animal, or human. On the contrary, the lack of inhabitants on the deserted island is a pure fact due to the circumstance, in other words, the island’s surroundings. The island is what the sea surrounds. What is de- serted is the ocean around it. It is by virtue of circumstance, for other reasons that the principle on which the island depends, that the ships pass in the distance and never come ashore.“ (from: Gilles Deleuze, Desert Island and Other Texts, Semiotext(e),Los Angeles, 2004) DESERTMED A project about the deserted islands of the Mediterranean Desertmed is an ongoing interdisciplina- land use, according to which the islands ry research project. The “blind spots” on can be divided into various groups or the European map serve as its subject typologies —although the distinctions are matter: approximately 300 uninhabited is- fluid. lands in the Mediterranean Sea. A group of artists, architects, writers and theoreti- cians traveled to forty of these often hard to reach islands in search of clues, impar- tially cataloguing information that can be interpreted in multiple ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Petalidi of Messinia
    Coastal Petalidi of Messinia Plan Days 3 A three days trip with beautiful beaches, hiking, magical castles and ancient cultures combined with accommodation in the traditional Stone Built Houses of Moorea Houses. By: Christina Koraki PLAN SUMMARY Day 1 1. Moorea - Christina & Gabriella Houses Accommodation 2. Ancient Messini Culture/Archaelogical sites 3. Archaeological Museum of Ancient Messene Culture/Museums 4. Pamisos Nature/Rivers 5. Archaeological Museum of Kalamata Culture/Museums 6. Tzanes Nature/Beaches 7. Moorea - Christina & Gabriella Houses Accommodation Day 2 1. Moorea - Christina & Gabriella Houses Accommodation 2. Pylos Castle (Niokastro) Culture/Castles 3. Voidokilia Nature/Beaches 4. Methoni Castle Culture/Castles 5. Polylimnio Nature/Waterfalls 6. Moorea - Christina & Gabriella Houses Accommodation Day 3 1. Moorea - Christina & Gabriella Houses Accommodation 2. Vrahakia Nature/Beaches 3. Koroni Castle Culture/Castles 4. Koroni Nature/Beaches WonderGreece.gr - Bon Voyage 1 Day 1 1. Moorea - Christina & Gabriella Houses Απόσταση: Start - Accommodation Χρόνος: - GPS: N36.960132529625945, W21.927522284130873 Note: Arriving at Petalidi, you will find the characteristic beauty of the Mediterranean coastal village with olive and fig trees giving a special charm. 2. Ancient Messini Απόσταση: by car 38.3km Culture / Archaelogical sites Χρόνος: 46′ GPS: N37.17531525140723, W21.920112358789083 Note: How an inhabitant lived in Ancient Messini? Where did he walk? Which buildings was looking on when was coming out of his house? These one will feel when visiting the ancient Messina. This really is a feeling, not a mere visual impression. 3. Archaeological Museum of Ancient Location: Ancient Messene (Mavromati) Messene Culture / Museums Contact: Τ: (+30) 27240 51201, 51046 Απόσταση: by car 1.0km Χρόνος: 10′ GPS: N37.18152235244687, W21.917387528419567 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese
    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA AN ancient city in Greece, the capital of Laconia and the most powerful state of the Peloponnese. The city lay at the northern end of the central Laconian plain, on the right bank of the river Eurotas, a little south of the point where it is joined by its largest tributary, the Oenus (mount Kelefina). The site is admirably fitted by nature to guard the only routes by which an army can penetrate Laconia from the land side, the Oenus and Eurotas valleys leading from Arcadia, its northern neighbour, and the Langada Pass over Mt Taygetus connecting Laconia and Messenia. At the same time its distance from the sea-Sparta is 27 m. from its seaport, Gythium, made it invulnerable to a maritime attack. I.-HISTORY Prehistoric Period.-Tradition relates that Sparta was founded by Lacedaemon, son of Zeus and Taygete, who called the city after the name of his wife, the daughter of Eurotas. But Amyclae and Therapne (Therapnae) seem to have been in early times of greater importance than Sparta, the former a Minyan foundation a few miles to the south of Sparta, the latter probably the Achaean capital of Laconia and the seat of Menelaus, Agamemnon's younger brother. Eighty years after the Trojan War, according to the traditional chronology, the Dorian migration took place. A band of Dorians united with a body of Aetolians to cross the Corinthian Gulf and invade the Peloponnese from the northwest. The Aetolians settled in Elis, the Dorians pushed up to the headwaters of the Alpheus, where they divided into two forces, one of which under Cresphontes invaded and later subdued Messenia, while the other, led by Aristodemus or, according to another version, by his twin sons Eurysthenes and Procles, made its way down the Eurotas were new settlements were formed and gained Sparta, which became the Dorian capital of Laconia.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Acropolis
    1 3 ∫·ÏˆÛÔÚ›Û·Ù ÛÙ‹Ó \∞ı‹Ó·! ^∏ \∂ÎÎÏËÛ›· ‰¤Ó ͯÒÚÈÛ ÔÙ¤ Ù‹Ó àÏ‹ıÂÈ· Ù˘ àfi Ù‹ ˙ˆ‹ Ù˘. ^∏ οı ʿÛË ÙÔÜ âÎÎÏËÛÈ·ÛÙÈÎÔÜ ‚›Ô˘, ì ‰ÈÔ›ÎËÛË, ì Ù¤¯ÓË, ì ÊÈÏ·ÓıÚˆ›·, ï ÌÔÓ·¯ÈÛÌfi˜ ÂrÓ·È ‚Ȉ̷ÙÈΤ˜ Ê·ÓÂÚÒÛÂȘ Ùɘ ηıÔÏÈÎɘ àÏ‹ıÂÈ·˜ η› àÔηχÙÔ˘Ó Ù‹Ó àÏ‹ıÂÈ· Ùɘ ηıÔÏÈÎɘ \∂ÎÎÏËÛ›·˜. ^∏ ÌÔÓ·‰È΋ àÓ¿ÁÎË Ô‡ Û˘Ó¤ÛÙËÛ ‰Ô̤˜ õ ıÂÛÌÔ‡˜, ΛÌÂÓ·, ‰fiÁÌ·Ù·, ηÓfiÓ˜ ̤۷ ÛÙ‹Ó \∂ÎÎÏËÛ›· qÙ·Ó ì âÛˆÙÂÚÈ΋ àÓ·ÁηÈfiÙËÙ· Ú·ÁÌ·ÙÒÛˆ˜ Ùɘ \∂ÎÎÏËÛ›·˜ ó˜ ÛÒÌ·ÙÔ˜ ÙÔÜ ÃÚÈÛÙÔÜ Î·› ëÓÒÛˆ˜ ÙÔÜ £ÂÔÜ Ì¤ ÙfiÓ ôÓıÚˆÔ. °È\ ·éÙfi η› ì ÏÂÈÙÔ˘ÚÁÈ- ΋ îÂÚ·Ú¯›· ÙáÓ ‰ÈÔÈÎËÙÈÎáÓ ‰ÔÌáÓ ñËÚÂÙÔÜÛ àfi Ù‹Ó àÚ¯‹ Ù‹ ÌÔÓ·‰È΋ ·éÙ‹ âÛˆÙÂÚÈ΋ àÓ·ÁηÈfiÙËÙ·, Ùfi ú‰ÈÔ ¬ˆ˜ η› Ùfi Ù˘ÈÎfi Ùɘ Ï·ÙÚ›·˜, ì êÁÈÔÁÚ·Ê›· õ ì àÚ¯ÈÙÂÎÙÔÓÈ΋ ÙáÓ Ó·áÓ: Ù‹Ó àÁ·ËÙÈ΋, ÊÈÏ·Ó- ıÚˆÈ΋ ÛÙ¿ÛË Ùɘ \∂ÎÎÏËÛ›·˜ à¤Ó·ÓÙÈ ÛÙfiÓ ôÓıÚˆÔ, ó˜ àÔÙ¤ÏÂÛÌ· Ùɘ ӛ΢ ¿Óˆ ÛÙfiÓ ı¿Ó·ÙÔ. Δfi öÓÙ˘Ô Ô‡ ÎÚ·ÙÄÙ ÛÙ¿ ¯¤ÚÈ· Û·˜, ÊÈÏÔÙ¯ÓË̤ÓÔ Ì¤ ÌÂÚ¿ÎÈ àfi Ù‹Ó \∞ÔÛÙÔÏÈ΋ ¢È·ÎÔÓ›· ̤ Ù‹Ó ÂéÏÔÁ›· ÙÔÜ ª·Î·ÚȈٿÙÔ˘ \∞Ú¯ÈÂÈÛÎfiÔ˘ \∞ıËÓáÓ Î·› ¿Û˘ ^∂ÏÏ¿‰Ô˜ Î. ^πÂÚˆÓ‡ÌÔ˘ η› Ùɘ ^πÂÚĘ ™˘Ófi‰Ô˘ η› Û¤ Û˘ÓÂÚÁ·Û›· ̤ Ùfi ™˘ÓÔ‰ÈÎfi °Ú·ÊÂÖÔ \∂ÎÎÏËÛÈ·ÛÙÈÎáÓ ¶ÂÚÈËÁ‹ÛÂˆÓ Ùɘ \∂ÎÎÏËÛ›·˜ Ùɘ ^∂ÏÏ¿‰Ô˜, ÂrÓ·È ≤Ó· ΛÓËÙÚÔ ÁÈ¿ Ó¿ âÈÛÎÂÊıÂÖÙ ÛÙ‹Ó \∞ı‹Ó· η› ÛÙ‹Ó ÂéÚ‡ÙÂÚË ÂÚÈÔ¯‹ Ùɘ \∞ÙÙÈÎɘ «Ì¤ ÌÈÎÚ¤˜ àÔ‰Ú¿ÛÂȘ» ‚˘˙·ÓÙÈÓ¿ ÌÓËÌÂÖ·, Ó·Ô‡˜, ÌÔÓ·ÛÙ‹ÚÈ· η› ÚÔÛÎ˘Ó‹Ì·Ù· ù¯È ÌfiÓÔ ÁÈ¿ Ó¿ ı·˘Ì¿ÛÂ- Ù Ùfi àÚ¯ÈÙÂÎÙÔÓÈÎfi οÏÏÔ˜ ÙÔ˘˜, àÏÏ¿ η› Ó¿ àӷηχ„ÂÙÂ Ù‹Ó ÂûÁψÙÙË ÛȈ‹ ÙÔ˘˜ ÁÈ¿ Ù‹ ÓÔËÌ·ÙÔ‰fi- ÙËÛË ÙÔÜ ‚›Ô˘ η› Ù‹ ¯·Ú¿ Ùɘ ˙ˆÉ˜.
    [Show full text]
  • Publication of an Amendment Application Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the Protection Of
    C 186/18 EN Official Journal of the European Union 26.6.2012 Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2012/C 186/10) This publication confers the right to object to the amendment application pursuant to Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 ( 1). Statements of objection must reach the Commission within six months of the date of this publication. AMENDMENT APPLICATION COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 510/2006 AMENDMENT APPLICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 9 ‘ΚΑΛΑΜΑΤΑ’ (KALAMATA) EC No: EL-PDO-0117-0037-21.12.2009 PGI ( ) PDO ( X ) 1. Heading in the specification affected by the amendment: — Name of product — ☒ Description of product — ☒ Geographical area — Proof of origin — ☒ Method of production — ☒ Link — Labelling — National requirements — Other (please specify) 2. Type of amendment(s): — Amendment to single document or summary sheet — ☒ Amendment to specification of registered PDO or PGI for which neither the single document nor the summary sheet has been published — Amendment to specification that requires no amendment to the published single document (Article 9(3) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006) — Temporary amendment to specification resulting from imposition of obligatory sanitary or phytosanitary measures by public authorities (Article 9(4) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006) 3. Amendment(s): 3.1. Description of product: In this application the olive oil produced is described in greater detail than in the initial registration dossier. Stricter quality specifications are laid down in order to ensure that the name is used only for the area's very best quality olive oil.
    [Show full text]
  • The Little Metropolis at Athens 15
    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Honors Theses Student Theses 2011 The Littleetr M opolis: Religion, Politics, & Spolia Paul Brazinski Bucknell University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Brazinski, Paul, "The Little eM tropolis: Religion, Politics, & Spolia" (2011). Honors Theses. 12. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses/12 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Paul A. Brazinski iv Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge and thank Professor Larson for her patience and thoughtful insight throughout the writing process. She was a tremendous help in editing as well, however, all errors are mine alone. This endeavor could not have been done without you. I would also like to thank Professor Sanders for showing me the fruitful possibilities in the field of Frankish archaeology. I wish to thank Professor Daly for lighting the initial spark for my classical and byzantine interests as well as serving as my archaeological role model. Lastly, I would also like to thank Professor Ulmer, Professor Jones, and all the other Professors who have influenced me and made my stay at Bucknell University one that I will never forget. This thesis is dedicated to my Mom, Dad, Brian, Mark, and yes, even Andrea. Paul A. Brazinski v Table of Contents Abstract viii Introduction 1 History 3 Byzantine Architecture 4 The Little Metropolis at Athens 15 Merbaka 24 Agioi Theodoroi 27 Hagiography: The Saints Theodores 29 Iconography & Cultural Perspectives 35 Conclusions 57 Work Cited 60 Appendix & Figures 65 Paul A.
    [Show full text]
  • 16 506 Oversikt
    Tel : +47 22413030 | Epost :[email protected]| Web :www.reisebazaar.no Karl Johans gt. 23, 0159 Oslo, Norway Highlights of Ancient Greece Turkode Destinasjoner Turen starter AGM Hellas Athens Turen destinasjon Reisen er levert av 9 dager Athens Fra : NOK 16 506 Oversikt Journey through thousands of years of Greece’s history. Reiserute Day 1 Start Athens. There are no included activities today so you are free to arrive in Athens at any time. The group flight usually arrives in Athens in the early afternoon. Accommodation: Arion Hotel or similarComfortable Hotel Day 2 Morning walking tour of Athens, including the Acropolis, the Museum of Acropolis and Plaka; afternoon free to explore Athens. This morning there is a walking tour of Athens, the historical capital of Europe, and the birthplace of democracy, dating back to the Neolithic Age. The archaeological sites of major interest that we will visit include the Acropolis and the Museum of Acropolis, also known as the city’s historical centre. This walk is actually a journey through history itself, where you will see classic ancient history, architectural evolution, and the city’s development until the 21st century (Classic period, Romaic period, Byzantine, Ottoman occupation, Neoclassic times, and 20th century).The afternoon is free for you to continue to explore Athens on your own, your leader will be able to suggest where to visit. Please note: During busy periods, the walking tour might take place in the afternoon when it is quieter and the morning will be free. Accommodation: Arion Hotel or similarComfortable Hotel Day 3 To Nafplio, visiting Ancient Corinth and Mycenae en route.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediterranean Marine Science
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by National Documentation Centre - EKT journals Mediterranean Marine Science Vol. 8, 2007 The freshwater ichthyofauna of Greece - an update based on a hydrographic basin survey ECONOMOU A.N. Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Inland Waters, P.O. Box 712, P.C. 19013, Anavyssos, Attiki GIAKOUMI S. Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Inland Waters, P.O. Box 712, P.C. 19013, Anavyssos, Attiki VARDAKAS L. Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Inland Waters, P.O. Box 712, P.C. 19013, Anavyssos, Attiki BARBIERI R. Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Inland Waters, P.O. Box 712, P.C. 19013, Anavyssos, Attiki STOUMBOUDI M.ΤΗ. Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Inland Waters, P.O. Box 712, P.C. 19013, Anavyssos, Attiki ZOGARIS S. Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Inland Waters, P.O. Box 712, P.C. 19013, Anavyssos, Attiki http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/mms.164 Copyright © 2007 To cite this article: ECONOMOU, A., GIAKOUMI, S., VARDAKAS, L., BARBIERI, R., STOUMBOUDI, M., & ZOGARIS, S. (2007). The freshwater ichthyofauna of Greece - an update based on a hydrographic basin survey. Mediterranean Marine Science, 8(1), 91-166. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/mms.164 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 09/03/2019 12:43:28 | Review Article Mediterranean Marine Science Volume 8/1, 2007, 91-166 The freshwater ichthyofauna of Greece - an update based on a hydrographic basin survey A.N.
    [Show full text]
  • INFOPACK for PARTICIPANTS Description of the Project
    Social entrepreneurship for a fair society… for a hopeful future Programme: Erasmus+ KA1: Mobility of Youth Workers. Activity: Training course Addressed to: Active and enthusiastic youth workers or people that work in different fields of social economy, employees or volunteers of the partner organizations and active groups of the region with a direct interest in youth employability. Organiser: Koukouva Social Cooperative Enterprise Project Ref. Number: 2019-3-EL02-KA105-005338 Dates: 07 – 13 June 2020 (excluding travel days) INFOPACK FOR PARTICIPANTS Description of the project As a cooperative, our dreams matched with the values of social economy and we found many solutions through its structures, but we also came across plenty of practices that raised a num- ber of concerns. Thus, recognizing the needs of the current social and economic conditions of most of European countries, as well as the different paths that could be taken due to them and being big support- ers of social economy, we decided to apply for this multinational training course. Through this training course, we intent to host youth workers and people who work in social economy in different countries so that we will together explore the field, exchange good prac- tices and create tools that we can use to facilitate young people understand social economy and its values, find their skills and how they can use them through it. • create a common understanding about the social OBJECTIVES values of Social Economy and how it can bring us closer to a more fair society, • explore the field of social economy and employ- ability in the different countries • create tools that could help the understanding and decision making of young people around social entrepreneurship, • provide, exchange and create tools about plan- ning and developing a social entrepreneurship • enforce youth workers with knowledge and tools on social economy and social entrepreneurship • create a network under common values for fu- ture collaboration.
    [Show full text]