Greater Golden Horseshoe Percentage of Census Families Who Are Lone Parent by 2006 Census Subdivision (CSD)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Greater Golden Horseshoe Percentage of census families who are lone parent by 2006 Census Subdivision (CSD) North Kawartha Penetanguishene Galway- Midland Cavendish and Harvey Havelock- Mnjikaning First Nation 32 Belmont- Christian Island 30 Methuen (Rama First Nation 32) Curve Lake Severn First Nation 35 Tiny Orillia Douro- Tay Ramara Dummer Oro- Christian Island 30A Medonte Smith- Asphodel- Kawartha Lakes Ennismore- Trent Hills Norwood Lakefield Chippewas of Wasaga Otonabee- Alderville Georgina Island Peterborough Beach South First Nation First Nation Springwater Mississaugas Cavan- Monaghan Brock of Scugog Brighton Collingwood Millbrook- Island Barrie North Cramahe Clearview Georgina Monaghan Hiawatha Alnwick/ Innisfil First Nation Haldimand Essa East Uxbridge Hamilton Adjala- Scugog Port Gwillimbury Tosorontio Bradford Hope West Newmarket Cobourg Mulmur Clarington Melancthon Gwillimbury Whitchurch- Whitby New Stouffville Tecumseth Aurora Pickering Oshawa East Luther Shelburne Grand Valley King Richmond Ajax Mono Hill Markham Amaranth Orangeville Vaughan Wellington North East Caledon Toronto Minto Garafraxa Brampton Erin Centre Mapleton Wellington Guelph/ Halton Hills Mississauga Eramosa Guelph Milton Oakville Woolwich Wellesley Waterloo Puslinch Burlington Cambridge Niagara- Kitchener on-the-Lake Wilmot Hamilton St. North Dumfries Catharines Six Nations Grimsby Lincoln (Part) 40 Thorold Niagara Falls West Lincoln Pelham Brantford Welland Fort Port Erie Brant Wainfleet Haldimand County Colborne Number of CSDs 67% New Credit 10 (Part) 40A 20% National 20 Average 16% 15.9% 26 12% 48 0% Census Metropolitain Area Not available 7 Census Agglomeration Source: 2006 Census of Canada. Produced by the Geography Division, Statistics Canada, 2007. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Even More Land Available for Homes and Jobs in the Greater Golden Horseshoe
March 9, 2017 An update on the total land supply: Even more land available for homes and jobs in the Greater Golden Horseshoe For more information, contact: Marcy Burchfield Executive Director [email protected] 416-972-9199 ext. 1 Neptis | 1 An update on the total land supply: Even more land available for homes and jobs in the Greater Golden Horseshoe This is the third in a series of Briefs on the land supply for future urban development designated by municipalities across the Greater Golden Horseshoe to accommodate growth to 2031. This Brief sums up the supply of land in (a) the Designated Greenfield Area (DGA), (b) unbuilt areas within Undelineated Built-up Areas (UBUAs), (c) land added through boundary changes to Barrie and Brantford and (d) Amendment 1 to the Growth Plan. Altogether, the supply of unbuilt land for housing and employment planned until 2031 and beyond is 125,600 hectares. How much land is available for development in the Greater Golden Horseshoe? Determining how much land has been set aside to accommodate future housing and employment across the Greater Golden Horseshoe is a fluid process, because land supply data are not fixed once and for all. Ontario Municipal Board decisions, amendments to local official plans, and boundary adjustments constantly alter the numbers. In the first phase of analysis in 2013, Neptis researchers focused on estimating the extent of the “Designated Greenfield Area” (DGA).1 This was land set aside by municipalities in land budgeting exercises to accommodate the population and employment targets allocated by the Province for the period 2006–2031 in the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe.
[Show full text]
Food Asset Mapping in Toronto and Greater Golden Horseshoe Region1 Lauren Baker
LAUREN BAKER FOOD ASSET MAPPING IN TORONTO AND GREATER GOLDEN HORSESHOE REGION1 LAUREN BAKER 216 ISOCARP FOOD ASSET MAPPING IN TORONTO AND GREATER GOLDEN HORSESHOE REGION » The purpose of the mapping project was to provide a baseline for planners and policy mak- ers to: 1. understand, promote and strengthen the regional food system, 2. provide information to enable analysis to inform decision making; and, 3. plan for resilience in the face of climate variability and socio, economic, and political vulnerability. « Figure 1: The bounty of the Greenbelt harvest season. Photo credit: Joan Brady REVIEW 12 217 LAUREN BAKER The City of Toronto is the largest City in Canada the third largest food processing and manufac- with a population of 2.6 million people (2011). turing cluster in North America, and the clus- The City is known as one of the most multicul- ter uses over 60% of the agricultural products tural cities in the world, with over 140 languages grown in Ontario3. Agriculture and the broader spoken. Immigrants account for 46% of Toron- food system contribute $11 billion and 38,000 to’s population, and one third of newcomers to jobs to the provincial economy, generating $1.7 Canada settle in the city2. Needless to say, diets billion in tax revenue. are extremely diverse. This represents an oppor- In 2005 a Greenbelt was created to contain tunity for the food and agriculture sector in On- urban growth and protect the natural and cul- tario, one that many organizations are seizing. tural heritage of the region. The Greenbelt pro- The region surrounding the City of Toronto, tects 7% of Ontario’s farmland, approximately known as the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH), 856,424 acres and 5501 farms4, mostly outside is made up of 21 upper and single tier munici- of urban communities clustered in the Golden palities.
[Show full text]
Schedule 1 Economic Development Sub-Committee EDS 2018-436 1 Table 1: Labour Force by Key Sectors, Population Aged 15 Years
Schedule 1 Economic Development Sub-Committee EDS 2018-436 1 Table 1: Labour force by key sectors, population aged 15 years and over Industry Simcoe County1 Ontario 2011 2016 2011 2016 Retail trade 31,640 29,710 (12.5%) 751,200 (10.9%) 783,540 (11%) (12.3%) Health care and 27,985 754,555 24,400 (10.2%) 692,130 (10.1%) social assistance (10.9%) (10.6%) Manufacturing 27,900 26,505 (11.1%) 697,565 (10.2%) 683,335 (9.6%) (10.9%) Tourism 25,815 2 24,415 (10.2%) 561,740 (8.2%) 625,495 (8.8%) (10.1%) Construction 25,140 20,600 (8.6%) 417,900 (6.1%) 476,835 (6.7%) (9.8%) Agriculture, forestry, fishing 3,340 (1.4%) 3,745 (1.5%) 101,280 (1.5%) 102,070 (1.4%) and hunting Source: Statistics Canada, National Household Survey 2011 & Census 2016 1 - Simcoe County includes the 16 member municipalities, 2 separated cities of Barrie and Orillia, Christian Island 30 and Mnjikaning First Nationa 32. 2 - Since the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) does not exist for “tourism”, staff have combined accommodation and food services with arts, entertainment and recreation to define the sector. This approach and definition was verified by the Tourism Simcoe County staff. Other sectors not listed here includes: mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction, utilities, wholesale trade, transportation and warehousing, information and cultural industries, finance and insurance, real estate and rental and leasing, professional, scientific and technical services, management of companies and enterprises, administrative and support, waste management
[Show full text]
Golden Horseshoe Food and Farming Action Plan
Photo : SF Photo GOLDEN HORSESHOE FOOD AND FARMING ACTION PLAN THE GOLDEN HORSESHOE FOOD AND FARM- ING PLAN INVOLVES THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INNOVATIVE GOVERNANCE BODY TO PRO- MOTE COLLABORATION BETWEEN SEVERAL LO- CAL GOVERNMENTS WITHIN A CITY REGION, AS WELL AS A RANGE OF OTHER ORGA- NIZATIONS WITH AN INTEREST IN THE Durham FOOD AND FARMING ECONOMY — IN- York CANADA CLUDING LARGE-SCALE FARMERS. IT Peel Toronto UNDERLINES THE VALUE OF ESTABLISH- ING CLEAR TERMS OF REFERENCE AND Halton MEDIATION TOOLS, AND FORG- ING INNOVATIVE GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES TO MANAGE THE Hamilton COMPLEXITIES OF FOOD SYS- Niagara Golden Horseshoe TEM PLANNING AT THE UR- BAN-RURAL INTERFACE. 52 CASE STUDIES 01 WHAT MAKES URBAN FOOD POLICY HAPPEN? GOLDEN HORSESHOE The Golden Horseshoe geographical region In 2011/12 seven municipalities of the Gold- stretches around the Western shores of Can- en Horseshoe — the cities of Hamilton and ada’s Lake Ontario, including the Greater To- Toronto, and the top-tier54 Municipal Regions ronto Area and neighbouring cities, towns of Durham, Halton, Niagara, Peel, and York — and rural communities52. It is one of the most adopted a common plan to help the food and densely populated parts of North America, and farming sector remain viable in the face of land an infux of educated, afuent professionals use pressures at the urban-rural interface, as has led to rapid development and expansion well as other challenges such as infrastructure of the cities. gaps, rising energy costs, and disjoined policy implementation. Yet historically the Golden Horseshoe has been an important agricultural region; more The Golden Horseshoe Food and Farming Plan than a million acres of productive farmland 2021 (GHFFP) (Walton, 2012a) is a ten-year plan remain in the Greenbelt and in the shrink- with fve objectives: ing peri-urban and rural spaces between • to grow the food and farming cluster; the urban hubs.
[Show full text]
Golden Horseshoe Economic Profile
SECTION 3 DEMOGRAPHIC GROWTH Project Coordinated By: This Section Prepared by: SECTION 3 - Demographic Growth 3.1 Introduction The objective of this section is to present a demographic profile for the Golden Horseshoe (GH) using the most recent (2011) census data.1 This section incorporates data from earlier census periods where available and allows for the identification of key demographic profiles and trends regarding population, immigration, social and cultural impacts and their marketing implications. The data shows profiles and trends for each of the participating municipalities and thus differences in key markets and locations are profiled. Except where indicated, data in this section is from the Statistics Canada censuses of 2006 and 2011. Starting in 2011, information previously collected by the mandatory long-form census questionnaire was collected as part of the voluntary National Household Survey (NHS). Caution should therefore be exercised in comparing 2011 data very closely with data from previous censuses.2 3.2 Population Growth The population of the GH and its municipalities has increased from 6.5 million in 2006 to 7 million in 2011, and now accounts for 55% of Ontario’s population. This represents a growth rate of 8% for the entire GH region over the five year period. The highest rates of growth have been experienced by Halton (14%), York (15%) and Peel (11%) which immediately surround Toronto. As further evidence of growth pressures being experienced in the GH, it is worth noting that Milton, Canada’s fastest growing municipality, grew by 57% over the period.3 Figure 3.1a below shows the growth rate for each upper tier municipality.
[Show full text]
Whereas It Has Been the Desire of the Town of Markham for Decades to See the Langstaff Planning Area Redevelop from a Mixed
Mr. Chair and Members of Council, it is with mixed emotion that I must make changes to my notice of motion put forward at our last meeting, I am sure that you can understand Mr. Chair how difficult it is for me to embrace a plan put forward by a Liberal Premier, but the Premiers announcement on June 15 to extend the Yonge Subway to Highway #7 was not only common sense, but it is what the Communities of Richmond Hill, Vaughan, Markham and indeed all residents of York Region need to implement “Places to Grow” and is what I have been working so hard to achieve, so thank you Mr. Premier and I did wear a red tie today I would like to state that the motion is seconded by Mayor Emmerson who is known to have Liberal leanings. Yonge Subway Motion Moved by: Regional Councillor Jim Jones Seconded by: Mayor Wayne Emmerson Whereas it has been the desire of the Town of Markham for decades to see the Langstaff planning area redevelop to a High End Urban Centre; and Whereas the Province of Ontario has in the past five years through the Central Ontario Smart Growth Plan report “Shape the Future” and the current Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe designated the Langstaff planning area and the Richmond Hill Centre as the Richmond Hill/Langstaff Gateway and one of the four Urban Growth Centres in York Region; and Whereas Urban Growth Centres are – “to accommodate and support major transit infrastructure” and “to serve as high density major employment centres that will attract provincially, nationally or international significant employment uses”
[Show full text]
City of Brantford Comments on the Proposed Amendment to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe [Financial Impact - None]
Alternative formats and communication supports available upon request. Please contact [email protected] or 519-759-4150 for assistance. Date February 5, 2019 Report No. 2019-85 To Chair and Members Committee of the Whole – Community Development From Paul Moore General Manager, Community Development 1.0 Type of Report Consent Item [ ] Item For Consideration [x] 2.0 Topic City of Brantford Comments on the Proposed Amendment to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe [Financial Impact - none] 3.0 Recommendation A. THAT Report 2019-85, City of Brantford Comments on the Proposed Amendment to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, BE RECEIVED; and B. THAT a copy of Report 2019-85 BE APPENDED to the City’s official comments submitted to the Ontario Growth Secretariat at the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing; and C. THAT a copy of the City’s official comments submitted to the Ontario Growth Secretariat at the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, including a copy of Report 2019-85, BE FORWARDED to Will Bouma, MPP, Brantford-Brant. 4.0 Purpose and Overview The purpose of this Report is to advise Council about the proposed amendment to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. On January 15, 2019 the Report No. 2019-85 Page 2 February 5, 2019 Province issued the proposed amendment (Amendment 1) to the Environmental Registry of Ontario (ERO #013-4504) with a deadline to receive comments by February 28, 2019. This Report provides an overview and Planning Staff’s comments regarding the proposed amendment and three related proposals.
[Show full text]
Golden Horseshoe Economic Profile
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared For GTA AAC Agriculture Action Committee T: 1.519.925.5975 W: www.foodandfarming.ca/ Project Coordinated By: Margaret Walton 104 Kimberley Avenue Bracebridge, ON P1L 1Z8 T: 1.705.645.1556 • F: 1.705.645.4500 In Collaboration With Executive Summary The Golden Horseshoe is a rich farming area producing a vast array of agricultural products, numbers of which cannot be grown elsewhere in Ontario. Even today, as the region with the largest concentration of urban development in Canada, the Golden Horseshoe (GH) continues to contain in excess of 6,000 farms with almost a million acres of farmland producing over 200 commodities for local and international markets and generating an estimated annual economic impact on the provincial economy of $6.3 billion. The GH is home to a rich, irreplaceable agricultural resource with a long history of prosperous, productive farms. It helps sustain one of the largest food processing clusters in North America and provides fresh local produce to support the burgeoning food service sector that enhances the quality of life for all Ontario residents. However, the nature of agricultural community in the GH continues to change. As pressure for urban growth continues, agricultural lands are under pressure. We need to understand this pressure and the impacts it is having on agriculture in the GH, in order to protect this resource. In the Golden Horseshoe Agriculture and Agri-Food Strategy Food and Farming: An Action Plan 2021 (The Action Plan), support for the GH food and farming cluster was identified as a fundament element in achieving the vision of sustaining the Golden Horseshoe as a “(…) globally renowned (…) vibrant food and farming cluster characterized by profitable farming operations, a thriving hub of food processing, food retail and food service businesses, extensive research capacity innovative technology, and a wide range of healthy and safe products”.
[Show full text]
Escribe Agenda Package
Authority Meeting Revised Agenda #10/17 January 5, 2018 9:30 A.M. HEAD OFFICE, 101 EXCHANGE AVENUE, VAUGHAN Pages 1. MINUTES OF MEETING #9/17, HELD ON NOVEMBER 17, 2017 Link to Minutes 2. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES 3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 4. DELEGATIONS 4.1 A delegation by Laura Alderson, in regard to item 10.1.1 - Request for Disposal of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Land. 4.2 - ADDED ITEM 4.2 A delegation by David Rembacz, in regard to item 10.1.2 - Request for Disposal of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Land. 5. PRESENTATIONS 6. CORRESPONDENCE 7. SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION 7.1 GREENBELT GOLDEN HORSESHOE CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES 5 COLLABORATIVE Expanding the Membership and Realigning the Geography and Mission of the Conservation Authorities Moraine Coalition 7.2 GOODWOOD RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TRACT TRAIL PLAN PROJECT 21 Initiation of Plan and Public Process 7.3 OAK RIDGES CORRIDOR CONSERVATION RESERVE TRAIL PLANNING 26 PROJECTS Initiation of Plan and Public Process 7.4 HUMAN RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM 32 Request to Undertake Request for Proposal Process 8. SECTION III - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD 9. MATERIAL FROM BUDGET/AUDIT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING No meeting held this month 10. MATERIAL FROM EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #10/17, HELD ON DECEBMER 15, 2017 Link to Minutes 10.1 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION 10.1.1 REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY LAND 14 Pickering/Scarborough Townline, City of Toronto, Rouge River Watershed CFN 33517 Page 552 10.1.2 REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY LAND 4156 Dundas Street West, Etobicoke, City of Toronto, Humber River Watershed CFN 45819 Page 558 10.1.3 GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2016-2020 Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed Build Toronto Inc.
[Show full text]
Urban Density in the Greater Golden Horseshoe
Centre for Urban and UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO Community Studies Urban Density in the Greater Golden Horseshoe Paul Hess, André Sorensen, and Kate Parizeau Research Paper 209 Centre for Urban and Community Studies University of Toronto May 2007 ISSN 0316-0068; ISBN-13 978-0-7727-1455-8 Urban Density in the Greater Golden Horseshoe Paul Hess, André Sorensen, and Kate Parizeau Research Paper 209 May 2007, vi, 69 pp. ISSN 0316-0068 ISBN-13 978-0-7727-1455-8 Centre for Urban and Community Studies University of Toronto 455 Spadina Avenue, 4th floor Toronto M5S 2G8 Canada Telephone: 416-978-2072 Fax 416-978-7162 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.urbancentre.utoronto.ca The opinions expressed in this or any paper published by the Centre for Urban and Community Studies do not necessarily reflect the views of the Centre, or those of the University of Toronto. Centre for Urban and Community Studies • University of Toronto • www.urbancentre.utoronto.ca Urban Density in the Greater Golden Horseshoe iii Executive Summary The Ontario government has recently taken a proactive approach to growth planning in the To- ronto region, now known as the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH). To carry out and monitor its policies, the Province needs reliable ways of measuring density and monitoring how it changes over time. However, definitions of density vary and there are many approaches to its measure- ment. This paper reviews common definitions and discusses methodological and data problems asso- ciated with density measurements in the GGH. The authors examine existing density distribu- tions in the GGH using 2001 census data at the scale of municipal areas, census tracts, and census dissemination areas, and analyse 10 sample census tracts in Urban Growth Centres to compare gross and net densities for different types of development areas in the GGH.
[Show full text]
Regulations in Planning Understanding the Relationship of the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and Housing Affordability
REGULATIONS IN PLANNING UNDERSTANDING THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE GROWTH PLAN FOR THE GREATER GOLDEN HORSESHOE AND HOUSING AFFORDABILITY by Benjamin Pister B.Sc. (Honours), McMaster University, 2015 A Major Research Paper presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Planning in Urban Development Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2017 © Benjamin Pister, 2017 I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this MRP. This is a true copy of the MRP, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this MRP to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this MRP by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my MRP may be made electronically available to the public. ii REGULATIONS IN PLANNING UNDERSTANDING THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE GROWTH PLAN FOR THE GREATER GOLDEN HORSESHOE AND HOUSING AFFORDABILITY © Benjamin Pister, 2017 Master of Planning in Urban Development Ryerson University ABSTRACT This research paper explores what impacts regional regulation, and the resulting planning process, has on ground-related housing. The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan) is a significant regulation requiring evaluation. It has been suggested that density targets mandated by the Growth Plan have continuously decreased the supply of ground-related housing in the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH). The combination of regional regulations and the time of processing development applications play an important role in understanding changes in housing supply.
[Show full text]
Child, Youth and Family 2018 Profile in Simcoe County Population (0-24 Yr), 2011-2016
Child, Youth and Family 2018 Profile in Simcoe County Population (0-24 yr), 2011-2016 CHRISTIAN ISLAND 30* PENETANGUISHENE 265 2,135 10.1% SEVERN MIDLAND 3,370 MNJIKANING 3,995 TAY 2.1% FIRST NATION 32 7.2% 2,375 320 5.9% TINY 5.8% 2,525 RAMARA 5.4% ORILLIA 2,090 7,970 5.6% ORO-MEDONTE 6.3% 5,590 COLLINGWOOD WASAGA 3.0% 5,225 BEACH SPRINGWATER 5.3% 4,205 5,845 14.4% 1.0% CLEARVIEW 4,000 BARRIE 5.9% 45,170 Simcoe County 1.2% 137,320 ESSA INNISFIL 1.6% 7,105 10,695 11.2% 6.7% ADJALA- Ontario TOSORONTIO BRADFORD WEST 3,914,030 3,155 GWILLIMBURY 5.7% NEW 11,430 0.4% TECUMSETH 23.5% Number of population (0-24 yr) 9,810 and population change (%) 7.3% between 2011 and 2016 * Data by age category for Christian Island 30 is not available in 2011 Census. Released: October 2018 Children and Youth (0-24 yr) In Simcoe County, The Total Number of Children and Youth In Ontario, 28.6% of total population 29.1% of total population are children and youth. 137,320 are children and youth. 5% 8% 8% 1% 9% 24,430 27,045 27,625 29,015 29,205 0-4 yr 5-9 yr 10-14 yr 15-19 yr 20-24 yr Key Points (0-24 yr) 18,585 4,275 8,725 3,235 14% 18% 3% 13% 6% 4% 2% 5% in Simcoe in Ontario in Simcoe in Ontario in Simcoe in Ontario in Simcoe in Ontario Live in Foreign-born Aboriginal Francophone Low-income Households Children and Youth Children and Youth Children and Youth (based on LIM-AT1) (immigrants or non-permanent residents) 1 in 3 2 in 5 1 in 4 low-income persons 1,090 Aboriginal population Francophones were under 24 yr recent immigrants were under 24 yr were under 24 yr 7,860 108,370 86,455 13,410 6% 22% 80% 62% 63% 51% 10% 36% in Simcoe in Ontario in Simcoe in Ontario in Simcoe in Ontario in Simcoe in Ontario Non-official Language Live in Mother Tongue Single-detached Houses Multiple Ethnic Origins Visible Minorities (single and multiple responses) 1.
[Show full text]