DOCSLIB.ORG

Schedule 1 Economic Development Sub-Committee EDS 2018-436 1 Table 1: Labour Force by Key Sectors, Population Aged 15 Years

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Schedule 1 Economic Development Sub-Committee EDS 2018-436 1 Table 1: Labour Force by Key Sectors, Population Aged 15 Years Schedule 1 Economic Development Sub-Committee EDS 2018-436 1 Table 1: Labour force by key sectors, population aged 15 years and over Industry Simcoe County1 Ontario 2011 2016 2011 2016 Retail trade 31,640 29,710 (12.5%) 751,200 (10.9%) 783,540 (11%) (12.3%) Health care and 27,985 754,555 24,400 (10.2%) 692,130 (10.1%) social assistance (10.9%) (10.6%) Manufacturing 27,900 26,505 (11.1%) 697,565 (10.2%) 683,335 (9.6%) (10.9%) Tourism 25,815 2 24,415 (10.2%) 561,740 (8.2%) 625,495 (8.8%) (10.1%) Construction 25,140 20,600 (8.6%) 417,900 (6.1%) 476,835 (6.7%) (9.8%) Agriculture, forestry, fishing 3,340 (1.4%) 3,745 (1.5%) 101,280 (1.5%) 102,070 (1.4%) and hunting Source: Statistics Canada, National Household Survey 2011 & Census 2016 1 - Simcoe County includes the 16 member municipalities, 2 separated cities of Barrie and Orillia, Christian Island 30 and Mnjikaning First Nationa 32. 2 - Since the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) does not exist for “tourism”, staff have combined accommodation and food services with arts, entertainment and recreation to define the sector. This approach and definition was verified by the Tourism Simcoe County staff. Other sectors not listed here includes: mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction, utilities, wholesale trade, transportation and warehousing, information and cultural industries, finance and insurance, real estate and rental and leasing, professional, scientific and technical services, management of companies and enterprises, administrative and support, waste management and remediation services, educational services, other services (except public administration), and public administration Table 2: Largest subsectors (3-digit NAICS) by job numbers Retail trade Subsectors 2018 Jobs Food and beverage stores 5,665 (20.5%) General merchandise stores 3,871 (14%) Building material and garden equipment and 2,895 (10.5%) supplies dealers Motor vehicle and parts dealers 2,835 (10.2%) Miscellaneous store retailers 2,661 (9.6%) Clothing and clothing accessories stores 2,402 (8.7%) Health and personal care stores 2,022 (7.3%) Sporting goods, hobby, book and music 1,416 (5.1%) stores Non-store retailers 1,177 (4.2%) Electronics and appliance stores 1,044 (3.8%) Furniture and home furnishings stores 1,041 (3.7%) Gasoline stations 662 (2.4%) Schedule 1 Economic Development Sub-Committee EDS 2018-436 2 Health care and social assistance Subsectors 2018 Jobs Ambulatory health care services 10,473 (38.6%) Hospitals 6,484 (23.9%) Nursing and residential care facilities 6,481 (23.9%) Social assistance 3,711 (13.6%) Manufacturing Subsectors 2018 Jobs Transportation equipment manufacturing 7,943 (34.8%) Machinery manufacturing 2,870 (12.6%) Plastics and rubber products manufacturing 2,227 (9.8%) Fabricated metal product manufacturing 2,046 (9%) Chemical manufacturing 1,135 (5%) Non-metallic mineral product manufacturing 1,135 (5%) Miscellaneous manufacturing 1,133 (5%) Food manufacturing 881 (3.9%) Printing and related support activities 685 (3%) Furniture and related product manufacturing 659 (2.9%) Primary metal manufacturing 418 (1.8%) Beverage and tobacco product manufacturing 349 (1.5%) Computer and electronic product 292 (1.3%) manufacturing Wood product manufacturing 289 (1.3%) Paper manufacturing 219 (0.9%) Electrical equipment, appliance and 218 (0.9%) component manufacturing Clothing manufacturing 128 (0.5%) Textile mills 84 (0.4%) Textile product mills 63 (0.3%) Leather and allied product manufacturing 35 (0.1%) Petroleum and coal product manufacturing <10 (Less than 0.1%) Tourism Subsectors 2018 Jobs Food services and drinking places 15,775 (62.8%) Amusement, gambling and recreation 5,335 (21.3%) industries Accommodation services 2,432 (9.7%) Performing arts, spectator sports and related 1,360 (5.4%) industries Heritage institutions 202 (0.8%) Schedule 1 Economic Development Sub-Committee EDS 2018-436 3 Construction Subsectors 2018 Jobs Specialty trade construction 11,277 (63.1%) Construction of buildings 5,117 (28.6%) Heavy and civil engineering construction 1,477 (8.3%) Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting Subsectors 2018 Jobs Farms 2,944 (96.7%) Support activities for agriculture and forestry 56 (1.8%) Forestry and logging 31 (1%) Fishing, hunting and trapping 12 (0.3%) Source: Emsi, Analyst 2018.1 Table 3: Number of businesses by key sectors, as of December 2017 Industry 1-9 10-99 100+ Indeterminate* Total employees employees employees Construction 1,965 5 (Less than 4,065 (63.5%) 367 (5.7%) 6,402 (30.7%) 0.1%) Retail Trade 1,112 1,589 (47%) 634 (18.7%) 49 (1.4%) 3,384 (32.9%) Health care and 1,029 social 1,552 (53.6%) 278 (9.6%) 34 (1.2%) 2,893 (35.6%) assistance Tourism 867 (42.3%) 562 (27.4%) 598 (29.1%) 24 (1.2%) 2,051 Agriculture, forestry, fishing 1,348 (82.3%) 235 (14.4%) 52 (3.2%) 2 (0.1%) 1,637 and hunting Manufacturing 640 (51.8%) 359 (29.1%) 196 (15.9%) 40 (3.2%) 1,235 Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Business Counts December 2017 *Businesses without employees correspond to the “indeterminate” employment category. The counts of businesses without employees cover all enterprises that meet one of the following criteria: is incorporated shows a minimum of $30,000 in revenue (non-taxable and/or taxable) Please note: The counts are compiled from the Business Register; Statistics Canada's central listing of Canadian businesses. They are based on the statistical concept of "location"—that is, each operating location is separately counted, including cases where one business comprises multiple locations. For example, a retail business with 10 stores represents 10 businesses in the Canadian business counts. Generally, among all Canadian businesses, 99% are single-location enterprises. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Child, Youth and Family 2018 Profile in Simcoe County Population (0-24 Yr), 2011-2016
    Child, Youth and Family 2018 Profile in Simcoe County Population (0-24 yr), 2011-2016 CHRISTIAN ISLAND 30* PENETANGUISHENE 265 2,135 10.1% SEVERN MIDLAND 3,370 MNJIKANING 3,995 TAY 2.1% FIRST NATION 32 7.2% 2,375 320 5.9% TINY 5.8% 2,525 RAMARA 5.4% ORILLIA 2,090 7,970 5.6% ORO-MEDONTE 6.3% 5,590 COLLINGWOOD WASAGA 3.0% 5,225 BEACH SPRINGWATER 5.3% 4,205 5,845 14.4% 1.0% CLEARVIEW 4,000 BARRIE 5.9% 45,170 Simcoe County 1.2% 137,320 ESSA INNISFIL 1.6% 7,105 10,695 11.2% 6.7% ADJALA- Ontario TOSORONTIO BRADFORD WEST 3,914,030 3,155 GWILLIMBURY 5.7% NEW 11,430 0.4% TECUMSETH 23.5% Number of population (0-24 yr) 9,810 and population change (%) 7.3% between 2011 and 2016 * Data by age category for Christian Island 30 is not available in 2011 Census. Released: October 2018 Children and Youth (0-24 yr) In Simcoe County, The Total Number of Children and Youth In Ontario, 28.6% of total population 29.1% of total population are children and youth. 137,320 are children and youth. 5% 8% 8% 1% 9% 24,430 27,045 27,625 29,015 29,205 0-4 yr 5-9 yr 10-14 yr 15-19 yr 20-24 yr Key Points (0-24 yr) 18,585 4,275 8,725 3,235 14% 18% 3% 13% 6% 4% 2% 5% in Simcoe in Ontario in Simcoe in Ontario in Simcoe in Ontario in Simcoe in Ontario Live in Foreign-born Aboriginal Francophone Low-income Households Children and Youth Children and Youth Children and Youth (based on LIM-AT1) (immigrants or non-permanent residents) 1 in 3 2 in 5 1 in 4 low-income persons 1,090 Aboriginal population Francophones were under 24 yr recent immigrants were under 24 yr were under 24 yr 7,860 108,370 86,455 13,410 6% 22% 80% 62% 63% 51% 10% 36% in Simcoe in Ontario in Simcoe in Ontario in Simcoe in Ontario in Simcoe in Ontario Non-official Language Live in Mother Tongue Single-detached Houses Multiple Ethnic Origins Visible Minorities (single and multiple responses) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Barrie SIDERD 20 ALE D YONGE ST MAPLEVIEW DR Ardagh 15 R S
    © 2021 Little Lake East Bayfield GEORGIAN DR 0110 HWY 0090 400 Bayfield Georgian Drive Alliance 0140 0080 CUNDLESST VINCENT RD E ST ENE RD West Bayfield 0120 H Cundles East UIS 0040 GROVE ST E NE ST W 0100 Grove East Sunnidale BAYFIELD ST DUCKWORTH ST 0150 LIVINGSTO STEEL ST SUNNIDAL0050 Wellington PENETANG 0130 E RD Codrington BLAKE ST ANNE ST N 0160 Northwest ON DR SHANTY 0010 BENS BAY RD BLAKE ST FERNDALE DR N North Shore Letitia Heights City Centre Queen's Park 0170 0060 0190 0180 BRADF Sandy Hollow ST ORD 0020 AN Lakeshore MILLER DR NE ST S Sanford 0200 South Shore DUNLOP ST W 0210 0260 400 North Allandale Centre 0070 Edgehill Drive 0220 BURTON AVE TIFFIN ST 0030 Allandale BAY PT RD PATTERSON RD HURST DR BIG 0230 COX Allandale Heights MILL RD Bayshore Painswick North 0240 0270 Innis-Shore 0250 FERND 0280 TOWNLINE RD Barrie SIDERD 20 ALE D YONGE ST MAPLEVIEW DR Ardagh 15 R S HU GH RD 0330 BIG BAY PT RD RONIA RD ARDA BAYVIEW DR Painswick South Rural Barrie Southeast HWY 400 N 400 East 0300 0290 VETERANS 0310 LOCKHART RD EVIEW DR E 400 West MAPL DR 0320 ESSA RD Holly 0340 EVIEW DR W MAPL LOCKHART RD SALEM RD Rural Barrie Southwest 0350 NE Understanding the Community 10TH LI numerical reference code: Example: 04-15-0010 Sandy Hollow Area-Municipality-Community Toronto Regional Real Estate Board Simcoe (04) - Barrie (15) Numerical Community Listing Alphabetical Community Listing Barrie (15) 0180 Queen’s Park Barrie (15) 0340 Holly 0010 Northwest 0190 City Centre 0310 400 East 0280 Innis-Shore 0020 Sandy Hollow 0200 Lakeshore 0070 400
    [Show full text]
  • Marketing Fragment 6 X 10.5.T65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-44030-1 - A Population History of the Huron-Petun, A.D. 500-1650 Gary Warrick Index More information Index Abenaki 201, 203, 226 Casselberry, Samuel 68, 87 agriculture Caughnawaga 133, 240, 241 beans 25, 29, 56, 89, 154, 166, 173 Chapdelaine, Claude 194 drought 16, 18, 20, 172, 237 Chesapeake Bay 233 forest clearance 177 Christian Island 30, 31, 238, 239 isotopic studies 29, 161, 166 chronologies maize 19, 25, 28, 56, 111, 165, 171, 172, contemporaneity problem 123, 134 181, 199 glass beads 98, 117, 118, 120, 198 pine stands 20, 56 iron axes 120, 121 population pressure 33, 167 periodization 88, 119, 120, 121, 123 squash 24 pipes 182, 201 Algonkians pottery decoration 109, 112 Algonkins 7, 26, 29, 221, 226, 230 pottery seriation 111, 116, 120 Cheveux Releves´ 221 radiocarbon dates 109, 110, 111, 112, 114, Kichesipirini 226 115, 116, 120, 157, 160 Nipissing 26, 178, 187, 210, 221, 224 regional site sequences 174 Nodwell 94, 159, 222 site duration 60, 61, 71, 87, 123, 140, 151 northern Algonkians 29, 180, 184, 210, site relocation sequences 137, 157 243 Cleary site 136, 137, 186 Odawa 26, 159, 187, 221, 222, 236, 242 Clermont, Norman 162, 181 Onontchatoronon 77, 210 climate change 34, 177, 198 Ottawa Valley 26, 29, 203, 226, 230 colonization 29, 91, 173, 175, 177, 178, Shield Algonkians 185, 187 179, 180, 181 Weskarini 231 Connecticut River 233, 234 alliances 158, 192 Cook, Noble 60 Andaste 231 Crawford Lake 15, 56 Assistaronon 236, 241 Crawford, Gary 110 Barrie site 177, 179 Dawson Creek site 110, 111, 158, 165 Bogaert, Harmen van den 81 deer Boserup, Ester 32, 34 deer herds 49, 175, 177, 179, 180, 218 deer hides 175, 178, 180, 189 Cahiague´ 75, 117, 118, 120, 206, 221 deer hunting territories 179, 180, 186 Canadian Shield 13, 26, 93, 160, 184 demographic archaeology 35, 37, 64, 84, 89, cannibalism 178, 239 141, 154 291 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-44030-1 - A Population History of the Huron-Petun, A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Francophone Population of Ontario by Census Subdivision
    Francophone Population of Ontario by Census Subdivision Total Francophone % Municipality (Census Subdivision) Population Population Francophone Abitibi 70 IRI 01900 145 5 3.4% Addington Highlands TP 00000 2,260 40 1.8% Adelaide-Metcalfe TP 00000 2,985 25 0.8% Adjala-Tosorontio TP 00000 10,970 170 1.5% Admaston/Bromley TP 00000 2,935 50 1.7% Ajax T 00000 119,215 2,525 2.1% Akwesasne (Part) 59 IRI 03300 1,470 20 1.4% Alberton TP 00000 965 15 1.6% Alderville First Nation IRI 01200 495 10 2.0% Alfred and Plantagenet TP 00000 9,550 7,440 77.9% Algoma 20000 112,725 7,595 6.7% Algoma, Unorganized, North Part NO 00000 5,740 315 5.5% Algonquin Highlands TP 00100 2,355 30 1.3% Alnwick/Haldimand TP 00000 6,860 95 1.4% Amaranth TP 00000 4,075 50 1.2% Amherstburg T 00000 21,770 715 3.3% Armour TP 00000 1,410 35 2.5% Armstrong TP 00000 1,170 695 59.4% Arnprior T 00000 8,610 400 4.6% Aroland 83 IRI 02300 365 0 0.0% Arran-Elderslie MU 00000 6,740 30 0.4% Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh TP 00000 5,420 40 0.7% Asphodel-Norwood TP 00000 3,990 45 1.1% Assiginack TP 00100 1,015 45 4.4% Athens TP 00000 2,955 65 2.2% Atikokan T 00000 2,705 85 3.1% Attawapiskat 91A IRI 03300 1,500 5 0.3% Augusta TP 00000 7,340 270 3.7% Aurora T 00000 54,955 1,100 2.0% Aylmer T 00000 7,425 40 0.5% Baldwin TP 00000 620 105 16.9% Bancroft T 00000 3,770 60 1.6% Barrie CY 00000 140,090 3,715 2.7% Bayham MU 00000 7,400 65 0.9% Bear Island 1 IRI 01900 150 0 0.0% Bearskin Lake IRI 01100 355 0 0.0% Beckwith TP 00000 7,645 460 6.0% Belleville CY 00000 49,885 930 1.9% Big Grassy River 35G IRI
    [Show full text]
  • Hydro One Re: Vegetation Maintenance Program
    Hydro One Networks Inc. Forestry Services www.HydroOne.com December 2020 Re: Vegetation Maintenance Program This letter is to inform you that Hydro One Networks Inc. (Hydro One) is scheduled to complete vegetation control activities in the proximity of the transmission lines that run adjacent to your property in 2021. This service is restricted to hydro tower line maintenance only. Vegetation management is necessary to ensure that minimum clearances are maintained between vegetation and energized apparatus reducing potential public safety hazards and tree-caused outages. Hydro One uses an integrated approach to vegetation management that may include one or all of the following techniques: • Removal of any dead or hazardous trees and pruning of branches away from power lines along the sides and underneath the hydro right-of-way. • Removal of non-compatible vegetation throughout the entire Hydro One corridor. • Mechanical cutters or grubbing machines used for brush removal depending on terrain and brush density. • Low volume backpack herbicide application of all non-compatible standing brush located on the hydro right-of-way. Compatible species such as Sumac, Dogwood, Lilac, etc, will be carefully avoided where possible. • Low volume backpack herbicide application utilized to control the suckering of incompatible brush that could grow from the stumps of cut trees or where brush has been removed. Cut stumps are treated with Garlon RTU (Registration #29334) and mineral oil which is a federally and provincially accepted herbicide used in Canada. Hydro One Staff are trained and experienced in the latest arboricultural practices and herbicide applicators are licensed by the Ministry of the Environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Lands & Resources
    Lands & Resources October 2017 Issue 1 Ahniin, Boozhoo In this newsletter you will find lots of great and interesting information about the Lands and Resources staff and what we are up to. Land Code Vote Coming! We have been working toward taking back the governance of our lands and resources for many years. You Beausoleil First Nation Lands & Resources Staff may remember that in Front: Amber King-Robitaille, Kristin Monague May 2015 we took to Back: Crystal Roote, Marcella Sunday, Dana Monague, Jane Copegog, Mike Smith, Susan Copegog the polls on whether to accept our First Nation’s proposed Land Code and opt out of certain sections of the Indian Act that pertain to Lands Management. You may remember that we missed our opportunity by only 26 yes votes. 26 Votes!!!! We had an overwhelming response from over 400 members! We have since received great news from the Lands Advisory Board with our Land Code Vote. They had approved our First Nation’s request to go forward with a second vote! That’s right a second chance to get it right, a second chance to address the concerns of members who voted no, or who didn’t quite understand what opting out of the Indian Act sections that relate to our Lands and Resources meant. Our goal is to address misconceptions and relay the exact details about what this means to us, our First Nation. We will discuss what First Nations Land Management under the Framework Agreement is and what it is not. Let’s regain momentum and get excited about our new opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Affordable Housing in Rural Ontario
    Under Pressure: Affordable Housing in Rural Ontario Amanda Slaunwhite Student Intern CPRN Research Report | December 2009 Amanda Slaunwhite Housing Intern BA (Hons), MPlan (Queen’s), PhD Student (University of Victoria) The Housing Internship and Scholar Program is organized and run by CPRN's Director of Housing and Environment, Dr. Michael Buzzelli. Foundational funding is provided by Social Housing Services Corporation. This project was funded by the Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH). The program’s overall aim is to develop Canada’s housing research and policy capacity by attracting and retaining the best and the brightest in the housing sector. The program is an intensive four-month policy research training experience that results in the publication of original housing policy research. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author’s and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing or Canadian Policy Research Networks. Canadian Policy Research Networks (CPRN) is a not-for-profit, independent think-tank. Our mission is to help make Canada a more just, prosperous and caring society. We seek to do this through excellent and timely research, effective networking and dissemination, and by providing a valued neutral space within which an open dialogue among all interested parties can take place. To obtain further information about CPRN, visit www.cprn.org. Copyright © 2009 Canadian Policy Research Networks Inc. Contents Figures and Tables ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Golden Horseshoe Percentage of Census Families Who Are Lone Parent by 2006 Census Subdivision (CSD)
    Greater Golden Horseshoe Percentage of census families who are lone parent by 2006 Census Subdivision (CSD) North Kawartha Penetanguishene Galway- Midland Cavendish and Harvey Havelock- Mnjikaning First Nation 32 Belmont- Christian Island 30 Methuen (Rama First Nation 32) Curve Lake Severn First Nation 35 Tiny Orillia Douro- Tay Ramara Dummer Oro- Christian Island 30A Medonte Smith- Asphodel- Kawartha Lakes Ennismore- Trent Hills Norwood Lakefield Chippewas of Wasaga Otonabee- Alderville Georgina Island Peterborough Beach South First Nation First Nation Springwater Mississaugas Cavan- Monaghan Brock of Scugog Brighton Collingwood Millbrook- Island Barrie North Cramahe Clearview Georgina Monaghan Hiawatha Alnwick/ Innisfil First Nation Haldimand Essa East Uxbridge Hamilton Adjala- Scugog Port Gwillimbury Tosorontio Bradford Hope West Newmarket Cobourg Mulmur Clarington Melancthon Gwillimbury Whitchurch- Whitby New Stouffville Tecumseth Aurora Pickering Oshawa East Luther Shelburne Grand Valley King Richmond Ajax Mono Hill Markham Amaranth Orangeville Vaughan Wellington North East Caledon Toronto Minto Garafraxa Brampton Erin Centre Mapleton Wellington Guelph/ Halton Hills Mississauga Eramosa Guelph Milton Oakville Woolwich Wellesley Waterloo Puslinch Burlington Cambridge Niagara- Kitchener on-the-Lake Wilmot Hamilton St. North Dumfries Catharines Six Nations Grimsby Lincoln (Part) 40 Thorold Niagara Falls West Lincoln Pelham Brantford Welland Fort Port Erie Brant Wainfleet Haldimand County Colborne Number of CSDs 67% New Credit 10 (Part) 40A 20% National 20 Average 16% 15.9% 26 12% 48 0% Census Metropolitain Area Not available 7 Census Agglomeration Source: 2006 Census of Canada. Produced by the Geography Division, Statistics Canada, 2007. .
    [Show full text]
  • NEWFOUNDLAND 1001101 Division No
    Table 1. Census Subdivisions showing Population, MIZ Category and North/South Location, 1991 Census (CSDs sorted by Province/Territory and Standard Geographical Classification Code) SGC 1991 Location Census Subdivision Name MIZ Category Code CSDPOP North or South NEWFOUNDLAND 1001101 Division No. 1, Subd. V 180 No MIZ South 1001105 Portugal Cove South 341 Moderate MIZ South 1001109 Biscay Bay 97 No MIZ South 1001113 Trepassey 1198 Moderate MIZ South 1001120 St. Shott's 232 No MIZ South 1001124 Division No. 1, Subd. U 1651 Strong MIZ South 1001126 Cape Broyle 693 Strong MIZ South 1001131 Renews-Cappahayden 551 Strong MIZ South 1001136 Fermeuse 505 Strong MIZ South 1001140 Port Kirwan 120 No MIZ South 1001144 Aquaforte 188 No MIZ South 1001149 Ferryland 717 Strong MIZ South 1001155 Division No. 1, Subd. W 536 Moderate MIZ South 1001169 St. Vincent's-St. Stephens-Peter's River 674 Moderate MIZ South 1001174 Gaskiers-Point la Haye 508 Moderate MIZ South 1001178 St. Mary's 637 Moderate MIZ South 1001181 Riverhead 398 Moderate MIZ South 1001186 Admiral's Beach 275 Moderate MIZ South 1001192 St. Joseph's 205 Moderate MIZ South 1001197 Mount Carmel-Mitchell's Brook-St. Catherine's 619 Moderate MIZ South 1001203 Division No. 1, Subd. X 545 Weak MIZ South 1001207 Colinet 232 Weak MIZ South 1001214 Division No. 1, Subd. C 314 Moderate MIZ South 1001219 Branch 382 Moderate MIZ South 1001225 Point Lance 161 Moderate MIZ South 1001228 St. Bride's 586 Moderate MIZ South 1001234 Division No. 1, Subd. B 681 Moderate MIZ South 1001239 Placentia 1954 Moderate MIZ South 1001243 Freshwater 1037 Moderate MIZ South 1001246 Jersey Side, Placentia Bay 715 No MIZ South 1001250 Dunville 1688 Moderate MIZ South 1001254 Fox Harbour 434 Moderate MIZ South 1001259 Division No.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Tts Version 1.0 Data Expansion & Validation
    2011 TTS VERSION 1.0 DATA EXPANSION & VALIDATION TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY 2011 A Telephone Interview Survey on Household Travel Behaviour in Greater Toronto and the Surrounding Areas Conducted in the Fall of 2011 and 2012 VERSION 1.0 DATA EXPANSION & VALIDATION Prepared for the Transportation Information Steering Committee by the Data Management Group Department of Civil Engineering University of Toronto October 2013 Participating Agencies: Ministry of Transportation, Ontario City of Barrie City of Brantford City of Guelph City of Hamilton City of Kawartha Lakes City of Orillia City of Peterborough City of Toronto County of Brant County of Dufferin County of Peterborough County of Simcoe County of Wellington Metrolinx Regional Municipality of Durham Regional Municipality of Halton Regional Municipality of Niagara Regional Municipality of Peel Regional Municipality of Waterloo Regional Municipality of York Toronto Transit Commission Town of Orangeville Table of Contents Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 2 Potential Sources of Error and Bias .......................................................................... 4 2.1 Sample Frame ................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Timing of Sample Selection .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Gravity Survey, Residual of the Bouguer Anomaly, Central Simcoe County Area; Ontario Geological Survey, Map 82 770, Scale 1:50 000
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power Demonstration (Npd) Indigenous Engagement Report
    GENERAL, REPORT NUCLEAR POWER DEMONSTRATION (NPD) INDIGENOUS ENGAGEMENT REPORT NPD DECOMMISSIONING 64-513130-REPT-001 Revision 3 Prepared by: 2020/03/31 Margot Thompson Date Communications Officer Reviewed by: 2020/03/31 Brian Wilcox Date Director, NPD and WR-1 Reactor Decommissioning Approved by: 2020/03/31 Mitch MacKay Date Manager, ERM Stakeholder Relations Effective date: 2020/03/31 UNRESTRICTED © Canadian Nuclear Laboratories This page is for Content Controls that apply to this document. If no Content Controls apply, none will be listed. Choose all content controls that apply before saving as a docx. UNRESTRICTED GENERAL, REPORT UNRESTRICTED NUCLEAR POWER DEMONSTRATION (NPD) INDIGENOUS ENGAGEMENT REPORT 64-513130-REPT-001 REV. 3 REVISION HISTORY Rev. Date Details of Rev. Prepared By Reviewed By Approved By No. 3 2020/03/31 Issued as “Approved for Use”. M. Thompson B. Wilcox M. MacKay 2 2017/10/27 Issued as “Approved for Use”. M. Thompson P. Daly P. Quinn 1 2017/09/15 Issued as “Approved for Use”. M. Thompson P. Daly P. Quinn R1D1 2017/08/21 Issued for “Review and Comment”. M. Thompson P. Daly P. Quinn M. Vickerd 0 2016/08/08 Issued as “Approved for Use”. M. Thompson P. Daly P. Quinn D2 2016/08/08 Issued for “Review and Comment”. C. Donak P. Daly P. Quinn J. Luiz M. Vickerd N. Stack T. Butz D1 2016/06/30 Issued for “Review and Comment”. C. Donak P. Daly P. Quinn J. Luiz M. Vickerd N. Stack T. Butz GENERAL, REPORT UNRESTRICTED NUCLEAR POWER DEMONSTRATION (NPD) INDIGENOUS ENGAGEMENT REPORT 64-513130-REPT-001 REV.
    [Show full text]