DOCSLIB.ORG

Global Forum on Food Security and Nutrition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Global Forum on Food Security and Nutrition Proceedings Implementing the Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication Collection of contributions received Discussion No. 94 from 11 November to 2 December 2013 www.fao.org/fsnforum/forum/discussions/SSF_Guidelines Global Forum on Food Security and Nutrition www.fao.org/fsnforum Implementing the Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication Proceedings TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction to the topic .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Contributions received ............................................................................................................................................. 6 1. Lena Westlund, Facilitator of the discussion, Sweden ......................................................................................... 6 2. Kenneth Senkosi, Forum for Sustainable Agriculture in Africa, Uganda ...................................................... 6 3. Manuel Castrillo, Proyecto Camino Verde, Costa Rica ......................................................................................... 7 4. John Kurien, India ............................................................................................................................................................... 7 5. Juan Carlos Gutierrez Mejía, Fundación Eduardoño, Colombia ....................................................................... 9 6. Agri econs5, University of Guyana, Guyana (multiple contributions) ........................................................ 22 7. UG Agricultural Economics Focus 2014, University of Guyana, Guyana (multiple contributions) 27 8. Ms. Francisca Gabriela Cruz Salazar, FENACOPEC, Ecuador .......................................................................... 30 9. Odusina Oluwaseun, Nigeria ........................................................................................................................................ 35 10. Agriculture Economics Research Group, 1 University of Guyana, Guyana (multiple contributions) 38 11. Future of Agricultural Economics ECN 4103 Group 2, University Of Guyana, Guyana (multiple contributions) ......................................................................................................................................................................... 39 12. UGAgri Group7, University of Guyana, Guyana (multiple contributions) .............................................. 42 13. Concern 3, University of Guyana, Guyana (multiple contributions)......................................................... 44 14. Andrew Johnston, Artisanal Fishers Association, South Africa .................................................................. 47 15. Austria, Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management, Austria48 16. Daniela Campeche, Embrapa Tropical Semi-Arid, Brasil .............................................................................. 48 17. Lena Westlund, Facilitator of the discussion, Sweden ................................................................................... 49 18. Group 4, University of Guyana, Guyana (multiple contributions) ............................................................. 50 19. Mignane Sarr, Université polytechnique de Thès, Sengal ............................................................................. 51 20. Matthieu Bernardon, France ..................................................................................................................................... 52 21. Rudolf Hermes, Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystem Project (BOBLE), Thailand ....................... 54 23. Prabir Dubba, Dg Foundan, India ............................................................................................................................ 55 24. Brian O’Riordan, CSO Platform on Fisheries (WFF, WFFP, ICSF, CIC, IPC), Belgium ......................... 55 25. Vincent Fernando, Sri Vimukthi Fisher Women Organisation , Sri Lanka ............................................. 61 26. Vivienne Solir-Rivera, CoopeSoliDar R.L. Costa Rica ...................................................................................... 68 27. National Fisheries Solidarity Movement, Sri Lanka ........................................................................................ 75 28. Andy Bystrom, Universidad Estatal a Distancia (UNED), Costa Rica ....................................................... 81 29. Kuperan Viswathan, University of Utara, Malaysia ......................................................................................... 81 30. Aliti Vunisea, Fiji ............................................................................................................................................................ 82 31. Ghazanfar Azadi, Islamic Republic of Iran ........................................................................................................... 86 2 Implementing the Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication Proceedings 32. Svein Jentoft, University of Tromso, Norway ..................................................................................................... 87 33. Gilles Van de Walle, FARNET Support Unit, Belgium ...................................................................................... 92 34. Adam Soliman, The Fisheries Law Centre, Canada .......................................................................................... 94 35. Patrick McConney, Barbados .................................................................................................................................... 99 36. Ratana Chuenpagdee Memorial University, Canada ..................................................................................... 100 37. Shannon Eldredge, Cape Cod Community Supported Fisheries, USA .................................................... 101 38. Andrew Johnston, Artisanal Fisheries Association, South Africa ............................................................ 103 39. St Vincent and the Grenadines ............................................................................................................................... 105 40. Shameem Sheik Dastagir, ActionAid INternational, India .......................................................................... 106 41. Arthur Bull, Bay of Fundy Marine Resource Centre, Canada .................................................................... 108 42. Héctor Bacigalupo, Chile ........................................................................................................................................... 109 43. Jessica Landman Senior Project Director, United States of America ...................................................... 114 44. Rosie Cooney IUCN Sustainable Use and Livelihoods Specialist Group (CEESP/SSC) .................... 115 45. Rita Gomes Correira Funny , Brazil ...................................................................................................................... 119 46. Gaoussou Gueye, Confédération africaine des Organisations professionnelles de pêche artisanale durable .................................................................................................................................................................................... 120 47. Marc Millette, Regroupement des Écoles de Pêche Francophones, Canada........................................ 125 48. Michèle Mesmain, Slow Food, Italy ...................................................................................................................... 126 49. Katosi Women Development Trust , Uganda ................................................................................................... 127 50. Abbas Khaled, INRA Algérie, Algeria ................................................................................................................... 130 51. Sergio Palma, Servicio Nacional de Pesca y Acuicultura, Chile ................................................................ 134 52. Katrien Holvoet Belgium / Benin .......................................................................................................................... 136 53. Harold Guiste, Ministry of the Environment, Natural Resources Physical Planning and Fisheries, Dominica ................................................................................................................................................................................. 137 54. Lena Westlund and the FAO SSF Guidelines team ......................................................................................... 139 3 Implementing the Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication Proceedings Introduction to the topic Following the recommendation of the 29th Session of the FAO Committee on Fisheries (COFI), FAO engaged in a consultative process to support the development of an international instrument for small-scale fisheries. The text of this instrument, the Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication (SSF Guidelines), is now being negotiated by FAO member states1 with the intention to present a final document to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Estimation of Antimicrobial Activities and Fatty Acid Composition Of
    Estimation of antimicrobial activities and fatty acid composition of actinobacteria isolated from water surface of underground lakes from Badzheyskaya and Okhotnichya caves in Siberia Irina V. Voytsekhovskaya1,*, Denis V. Axenov-Gribanov1,2,*, Svetlana A. Murzina3, Svetlana N. Pekkoeva3, Eugeniy S. Protasov1, Stanislav V. Gamaiunov2 and Maxim A. Timofeyev1 1 Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk, Russia 2 Baikal Research Centre, Irkutsk, Russia 3 Institute of Biology of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Petrozavodsk, Karelia, Russia * These authors contributed equally to this work. ABSTRACT Extreme and unusual ecosystems such as isolated ancient caves are considered as potential tools for the discovery of novel natural products with biological activities. Acti- nobacteria that inhabit these unusual ecosystems are examined as a promising source for the development of new drugs. In this study we focused on the preliminary estimation of fatty acid composition and antibacterial properties of culturable actinobacteria isolated from water surface of underground lakes located in Badzheyskaya and Okhotnichya caves in Siberia. Here we present isolation of 17 strains of actinobacteria that belong to the Streptomyces, Nocardia and Nocardiopsis genera. Using assays for antibacterial and antifungal activities, we found that a number of strains belonging to the genus Streptomyces isolated from Badzheyskaya cave demonstrated inhibition activity against Submitted 23 May 2018 bacteria and fungi. It was shown that representatives of the genera Nocardia and Accepted 24 September 2018 Nocardiopsis isolated from Okhotnichya cave did not demonstrate any tested antibiotic Published 25 October 2018 properties. However, despite the lack of antimicrobial and fungicidal activity of Corresponding author Nocardia extracts, those strains are specific in terms of their fatty acid spectrum.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trade in Live Reef Food Fish Volume 1
    THE TRADE IN LIVE REEF FOOD FISH GOING GOING GONE VOLUME 1 MAIN REPORT Acknowledgements This report was prepared by ADM Capital Foundation and the University of Hong Kong. We would like to thank Sam Inglis, Lisa Genasci, Jane Chu, Kathleen Ho and and Ellie Appleby for their diligence in reading and editing; Doug Woodring, who drove the initial concept; and DESIGNORM for their innovative and informative graphics. Rachel Wong helped to compile some of the data, and Liu Min, Joyce Wu and Felix Chan kindly provided data. We are grateful to the government staff of the Marine Department, the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, the Fish Marketing Organization and the Customs and Excise Department for responding to our questions and clarifying issues raised, as well as reviewing an earlier draft, and to the many traders and participants of the trade who we interviewed. Disclaimer This document (the ‘Document’) has been prepared by ADM Capital Foundation (‘ADMCF’) for general introduction, overview and discussion purposes only and does not constitute definitive advice on regulatory, investment or legal issues. It should not be used as a substitute for taking regulatory, financial, tax or legal advice in any specific situation. Information provided in the report has been obtained from, or is based upon, sources believed to be reliable but have not been independently verified, and no guarantee, representation or warranty is made as to its accuracy or completeness. Information contained in this Document is current as of December 2017 and is subject to change without notice. Information contained in this Document relating to unrealised data and projections is indicative only, and has been based on unaudited, internal data and assumptions, which have not been independently verified and are subject to material corrections, verifications and amendments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Basis in New Hampshire: Adopting Stormwater Zoning Ordinances and Land Development Regulations
    The Legal Basis in New Hampshire: Adopting Stormwater Zoning Ordinances and Land Development Regulations FEDERAL LAW NPDES AND EPA The lack of a precise definition of MEP allows small Through the Phase 1 and Phase 2 NPDES MS4s flexibility in tailoring their programs to their CLEAN WATER ACT programs EPA sets water quality standards for actual needs. The Clean Water Act (CWA) originated as the point source and wastewater discharge permits. The MEP standard requires small MS4s to satisfy Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 in EPA administers NH’s NPDES permit program the following six “minimum control measures”: response to unchecked dumping of pollution into and permits for stormwater and sewer overflow 1) Public Education and Outreach the nation’s surface waters. At that time, about discharges. Individual homes that are connected to 2) Public Participation 2 /3 of U.S. waters had been declared unsafe for a municipal system, use a septic system, or do not fishing and swimming. The CWA provides the basic produce surface discharge do not need an NPDES 3) Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination structure for: permit. Industrial, municipal, and other facilities (IDDE) Program must obtain permits if their discharges go directly 4) Construction Site Runoff Controls 1) regulating discharges of pollution into the to surface waters. waters of the United States, and 5) Post-Construction Runoff Controls 6) Good House Keeping and Pollution Prevention 2) regulating quality standards for the nation’s NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT TYPES for Municipal Operations surface waters. Its objective is “to restore and The NPDES permit regulations cover 3 main maintain the chemical, physical, and biological classes of stormwater and wastewater discharges.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Runoff Control: a Model Ordinance for Meeting Local Water Quality Management Needs
    Volume 20 Issue 4 Fall 1980 Fall 1980 Stormwater Runoff Control: A Model Ordinance for Meeting Local Water Quality Management Needs Frank E. Maloney Richard G. Hamann Bram D. Canter Recommended Citation Frank E. Maloney, Richard G. Hamann & Bram D. Canter, Stormwater Runoff Control: A Model Ordinance for Meeting Local Water Quality Management Needs, 20 Nat. Resources J. 713 (1980). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol20/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. STORMWATER RUNOFF CONTROL: A MODEL ORDINANCE FOR MEETING LOCAL WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT NEEDS FRANK E. MALONEY,* RICHARD G. HAMANN** and BRAM D. E. CANTER*** INTRODUCTION Water pollution abatement programs in the United States have been directed almost entirely toward the elimination of point sources of water pollution-defined in the Federal Water Pollution Control Act' as "any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance... from which pollutants are or may be discharged." 2 Yet officials of the En- vironmental Protection Agency estimate that fifty percent or more of the nation's water pollution is waste picked up from the land by rainfall, which then reaches ground and surface waters through run- off and seepage and not through a pipe or other point source of pollution.3 The waters which drain urban streets, construction sites, agricul- tural areas and other sites of intensive human use are often heavily *Professor of Law and Dean Emeritus, University of Florida Law Center; Director, Water Law Studies of the University of Florida; B.A., 1939, University of Toronto; J.D., 1942, University of Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft District of Columbia Stormwater Management Guidebook Page 10 Chapter 2
    STORMWATER MANAGEMENT GUIDEBOOK Prepared for: District Department of the Environment Watershed Protection Division District of Columbia Prepared by: Center for Watershed Protection 8390 Main Street Ellicott City, MD 21043 August 2012 i ii #!&,'!* ',$-0+2'-, 0#%0"',% $3230# 3."2#1 2- 2&# '120'!2 -$ -*3+ ' 2-0+52#0 ,%#+#,2 3'"# --) 5'** # 4'* *# 2 Q &22.S ""-#T"!T%-4 .3 *'!2'-, 12-0+52#0V%3'"# --) #-2'!#1 0#%0"',% $3230# 4#01'-,1 -$ 2&# +,3* 5'** # .-12#" 2 2&'1 5# 1'2#T $3230# 4#01'-,1 0# #6.#!2#" 2- -!!30Q 2 +-12Q -,!# 7#0T Acknowledgements A major undertaking such as this requires the dedication and cooperative efforts of many individuals. Dr. Hamid Karimi, Director of Natural Resources, Sheila Besse, Associate Director of Watershed Protection, Jeff Seltzer, Associate Director of Stormwater Management, and Timothy Karikari, Branch Chief of Technical Services each deserve credit for their overall leadership and support for this project. Their willingness to allow staff to pursue ideas to their fullest and provide necessary time, resources and managerial support, laid the foundation for much innovation. Project Manger Rebecca C. Stack, DDOE-technical services Lead Authors Greg Hoffmann, P.E., Center for Watershed Protection Rebecca C. Stack, DDOE-technical services Brian Van Wye, DDOE-stormwater Contributors and Peer Reviewers Joseph Battiata, P.E., Center for Watershed Protection Gerald Brock, Ph.D., George Washington University Josh Burch, DDOE-planning & restoration Collin R. Burrell, DDOE-water quality Walter Caldwell, DDOE-inspection enforcement Jonathan Champion, DDOE-stormwater Reid Christianson P.E., Ph.D., Center for Watershed Protection Laine Cidlowski, Office of Planning Richard DeGrandchamp, Ph.D., University of Colorado/Scientia Veritas Elias Demessie, DDOE-technical services Diane Douglas, DDOE-water quality Alex Foraste, Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Forum on Rights-Based Approaches for Fisheries
    Tenure & Fishing Rights 2015 - A global forum on rights-based approaches for fisheries Programme Sunday 22 March 2015 14.00 – 18.00 Registration at Apsara Angkor Hotel 18.00 – 19.30 Welcome Reception at Apsara Angkor Hotel Monday 23 March 2015 7:45- Registration at Apsara Angkor Speakers 9:00 Hotel Chair: H.E. Nao Thuok, Under Secretary of State of Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), Cambodia 09:00- Forum Opening Welcoming Remarks 9:45 Welcome speech by H.E. Sin Run, Siem Reap Deputy Governor, Cambodia Mr Johán H Williams, Specialist Director Fisheries and Aquaculture, Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries, Norway H.E. Eng Chea San, Delegate of the Royal Government of Cambodia and Director-General of Fisheries Administration, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Cambodia H.E. Jean-François Cautain, Ambassador of the European Union in Cambodia Ms Nina Brandstrup, FAO Representative in Cambodia, on behalf of FAO Director-General José Graziano da Silva Opening H.E. Ouk Rabun, Minister, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), Cambodia 9:45 – Plenary Session: 10.30 Setting the Scene for Discussing Ms Kate Bonzon, Senior Director, Oceans Program, Environmental Rights-based Experiences: An Defense Fund, USA 1 overview An overview of the types of user rights and how they may conserve fishery resources and provide food security, contribute to poverty eradication, and lead to development of fishing communities. 10.30- Plenary: Question and Answer 11:00 session Moderator: Mr Georges Dehoux, Attaché, Cooperation Section, Delegation of the European Union in the Kingdom of Cambodia and Co- Chair of the Cambodia Technical Working Group on Fisheries 11:00- Plenary session: Cambodia’s Ms Kaing Khim, Deputy Director General, Fisheries Administration, 11:30 experience with rights-based Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Cambodia approaches: the social, economic and environmental aspects of developing and implementing a user rights system 11:30- Plenary session: A[nother] Asian Mr Dedi S.
    [Show full text]
  • Career Guide Cover.Indd
    Food Law and Policy Career Guide For anyone interested in an internship or a career in food law and policy, this guide illustrates many of the diverse array of choices, whether you seek a traditional legal job or would like to get involved in research, advocacy, or policy-making within the food system. 2nd Edition Summer 2013 Researched and Prepared by: Harvard Food Law and Policy Clinic Emily Broad Leib, Director Allli Condra, Clinical Fellow Harvard Food Law and Policy Division Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation Harvard Law School 122 Boylston Street Jamaica Plain, MA 02130 [email protected] www.law.harvard.edu/academics/clinical/lsc Harvard Food Law Society Cristina Almendarez, Grant Barbosa, Rachel Clark, Kate Schmidt, Erin Schwartz, Lauren Sidner Harvard Law School www3.law.harvard.edu/orgs/foodlaw/ Special Thanks to: Louisa Denison Kathleen Eutsler Caitlin Foley Adam Jaffee Annika Nielsen Kate Olender Niousha Rahbar Adam Soliman Note to Readers: This guide is a work in progress and will be updated, corrected, and expanded over time. If you want to include additional organizations or suggest edits to any of the current listings, please email [email protected]. 2 table of contents an introduction to food law and policy ........................................................................................................................... 4 guide to areas of specialization .......................................................................................................................................... 5 section
    [Show full text]
  • Felicia Wu, Ph.D
    FELICIA WU, PH.D. John A. Hannah Distinguished Professor Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics Michigan State University 204 Trout FSHN Building, 469 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI 48824 Tel: 1-517-432-4442 Fax: 1-517-353-8963 [email protected] EDUCATION 1998 Harvard University A.B., S.M., Applied Mathematics & Medical Sciences 2002 Carnegie Mellon University Ph.D., Engineering & Public Policy APPOINTMENTS & POSITIONS 2013-present John A. Hannah Distinguished Professor, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI . Director, Center for Health Impacts of Agriculture (CHIA) . Core Faculty, Center for Integrative Toxicology . Core Faculty, International Institute of Health . Core Faculty, Center for Gender in Global Context 2011-2013 Associate Professor, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA . Secondary Faculty, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine . Secondary Faculty, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs . Core Faculty, Center for Research on Health Care . Secondary Faculty, Center for Bioethics and Health Law . Faculty Advisory Board, European Union Center for Excellence 2004-2011 Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 2002-2004 Associate Policy Researcher, RAND, Pittsburgh, PA RESEARCH AND TEACHING Fields Food Safety, Food Security, Global Health and the Environment, Mycotoxins, Agricultural Health, Agricultural Biotechnology, Climate Change, Indoor Air Quality Methods Economics, Mathematical Modeling, Quantitative Risk Assessment, Risk Communication, Policy Analysis AWARDS & HONORS . The National Academies: National Research Council (NRC) Committee on Considerations for the Future of Animal Science Research, 2014-2015 .
    [Show full text]
  • What If California's Drought Continues?
    August 2015 PPIC WATER POLICY CENTER What If California’s Drought Continues? Ellen Hanak Jeffrey Mount Caitrin Chappelle Jay Lund Josué Medellín-Azuara Peter Moyle Nathaniel Seavy Research support from Emma Freeman, Jelena Jedzimirovic, Henry McCann, and Adam Soliman Supported with funding from the California Water Foundation, an initiative of the Resources Legacy Fund Summary California is in the fourth year of a severe, hot drought—the kind that is increasingly likely as the climate warms. Although no sector has been untouched, impacts so far have varied greatly, reflecting different levels of drought preparedness. Urban areas are in the best shape, thanks to sustained investments in diversified water portfolios and conservation. Farmers are more vulnerable, but they are also adapting. The greatest vulnerabilities are in some low-income rural communities where wells are running dry and in California’s wetlands, rivers, and forests, where the state’s iconic biodiversity is under extreme threat. Two to three more years of drought will increase challenges in all areas and require continued—and likely increasingly difficult—adaptations. Emergency programs will need to be significantly expanded to get drinking water to rural residents and to prevent major losses of waterbirds and extinctions of numerous native fish species, including most salmon runs. California also needs to start a longer-term effort to build drought resilience in the most vulnerable areas. Introduction In 2015, California entered the fourth year of a severe drought. Although droughts are a regular feature of the state’s climate, the current drought is unique in modern history. Taken together, the past four years have been the driest since record keeping began in the late 1800s.1 This drought has also been exceptionally warm (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • WRITTEN EVIDENCE of the CITY of VANCOUVER APPENDIX 83 Written Evidence of Rashid Sumaila, Phd
    WRITTEN EVIDENCE OF THE CITY OF VANCOUVER APPENDIX 83 Written Evidence of Rashid Sumaila, PhD {00224463v1} National Energy Board Hearing into Trans Mountain Expansion Project Direct Written Evidence of Rashid Sumaila Prepared for the City of Vancouver May 19, 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction and summary of witness qualification 1 2. Summary of Conclusions 3 3. Summary of Analysis 6 Appendix A: CV of Rashid Sumaila Appendix B: Report of Sumaila R, Hotte N and Bjarnason H, Potential economic impacts of a tanker spill on ocean-dependent activities in Vancouver, British Columbia (May 2015) Appendix C: CV of Ngaio Hotte Appendix D: CV of Harmony Bjarnason Appendix E: Certificate of Expert's Duty 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS 2 Q.l Please state your name, occupation and business address. 3 A.l My name is Ussif Rashid Sumaila and I am a Professor and Director of the 4 Fisheries Economics Research Unit at UBC Fisheries Centre. 5 My address is 6 UBC Fisheries Centre, 7 2202 Main Mall 8 Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 9 Q.2 What is your academic background? 10 A.2 I have a Ph.D. in Economics from the University of Bergen, a Master of Science 1 1 degree in Economics from the University of Bergen and a Bachelor of Science from 1 2 Ahmadu Bello Univeristy. 1 3 Q.3 Please outline your principal areas of research. 14 A.3 I specialize in hioeconomics, marine ecosystem valuation and the analysis of 15 global issues such as fisheries subsidies, IUU (illegal, unreported and unregulated) 16 fishing and the economics of oil spills, high and deep seas fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquid Business
    Florida State University Law Review Volume 47 Issue 1 In Tribute to Talbot "Sandy" D'Alemberte Article 9 Fall 2019 Liquid Business Vanessa C. Perez Texas A&M School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons Recommended Citation Vanessa C. Perez, Liquid Business, 47 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 201 (2019) . https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol47/iss1/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LIQUID BUSINESS VANESSA CASADO PEREZ* Water is scarcer due to climate change and in higher demand due to population growth than ever before. As if these stressors were not concerning enough, corporate investors are participating in water mar- kets in ways that sidestep U.S. water law doctrine’s aims of preventing speculation and assuring that the holders of water rights internalize any externalities associated with changes in their rights. The operation of these new players in the shadow of traditional water law is produc- ing elements of inefficiency and unfairness in the allocation of water rights. Resisting the polar calls for unfettered water markets, or, con- trarily, the complete de-commodification of water in the face of these challenges, this Article identifies a portfolio of measures that can help get regulated water markets back on a prudent, sustainable track in our contemporary world.
    [Show full text]
  • What If California's Drought Continues?
    August 2015 PPIC WATER POLICY CENTER What If California’s Drought Continues? Ellen Hanak Jeffrey Mount Caitrin Chappelle Jay Lund Josué Medellín-Azuara Peter Moyle Nathaniel Seavy Research support from Emma Freeman, Jelena Jedzimirovic, Henry McCann, and Adam Soliman Supported with funding from the California Water Foundation, an initiative of the Resources Legacy Fund Summary California is in the fourth year of a severe, hot drought—the kind that is increasingly likely as the climate warms. Although no sector has been untouched, impacts so far have varied greatly, reflecting different levels of drought preparedness. Urban areas are in the best shape, thanks to sustained investments in diversified water portfolios and conservation. Farmers are more vulnerable, but they are also adapting. The greatest vulnerabilities are in some low-income rural communities where wells are running dry and in California’s wetlands, rivers, and forests, where the state’s iconic biodiversity is under extreme threat. Two to three more years of drought will increase challenges in all areas and require continued—and likely increasingly difficult—adaptations. Emergency programs will need to be significantly expanded to get drinking water to rural residents and to prevent major losses of waterbirds and extinctions of numerous native fish species, including most salmon runs. California also needs to start a longer-term effort to build drought resilience in the most vulnerable areas. Introduction In 2015, California entered the fourth year of a severe drought. Although droughts are a regular feature of the state’s climate, the current drought is unique in modern history. Taken together, the past four years have been the driest since record keeping began in the late 1800s.1 This drought has also been exceptionally warm (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]