DOCSLIB.ORG

Site at Lombard Wall, Charlton

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Site at Lombard Wall, Charlton PREC Red Lion Propco 2 Site at Lombard Wall, Charlton Flood Risk Assessment & Indicative Surface Water Drainage Strategy 134026-R1(2)-FRA APRIL 2021 RSK GENERAL NOTES Project No.: 134026-R1(2)-FRA Site: Site at Lombard Wall, Charlton Title: Flood Risk Assessment & Indicative Surface Water Drainage Strategy Client: PREC Red Lion Propco 2 Date: 30th April 2021 Office: Hemel Hempstead Status: Final Technical Author S Thorpe reviewer M Cheeseman Signature Signature Date: 30th April 2021 Date: 30th April 2021 Quality reviewer C Whittingham Signature Date: 30th April 2021 Date Reviewed Approved Issue No Version/Details Author issued by by R1(0) Draft 31.03.21 ST MEC CW R1(1) Final 27.04.21 ST MEC CW R1(2) Updated site layout plan 30.04.21 ST CW CW RSK LDE Ltd (RSK) has prepared this report for the sole use of the client, showing reasonable skill and care, for the intended purposes as stated in the agreement under which this work was completed. The report may not be relied upon by any other party without the express agreement of the client and RSK. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report. Where any data supplied by the client or from other sources have been used, it has been assumed that the information is correct. No responsibility can be accepted by RSK for inaccuracies in the data supplied by any other party. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on the assumption that all relevant information has been supplied by those bodies from whom it was requested. No part of this report may be copied or duplicated without the express permission of RSK and the party for whom it was prepared. Where field investigations have been carried out, these have been restricted to a level of detail required to achieve the stated objectives of the work. This work has been undertaken in accordance with the quality management system of RSK LDE Ltd. PREC Red Lion Propco 2 Site at Lombard Wall, Charlton Flood Risk Assessment & Indicative Surface Water Drainage Strategy 134026-R1(2)-FRA CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 2 SITE DESCRIPTION & PROPOSALS ............................................................................................. 2 2.1 Existing site .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Development Proposals ........................................................................................................... 3 3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .......................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................. 4 3.2 Geology .................................................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Hydrogeology ........................................................................................................................... 4 4 SOURCES OF FLOOD RISK ........................................................................................................... 5 4.1 Criteria ...................................................................................................................................... 5 4.2 Flooding from rivers (fluvial flood risk) ...................................................................................... 5 4.3 Flooding from the sea (tidal flood risk) ..................................................................................... 6 4.4 Flooding from the land (overland pluvial flood risk) .................................................................. 7 4.5 Flooding from groundwater ...................................................................................................... 8 4.6 Flooding from sewers ............................................................................................................... 9 4.7 Other sources of flooding ....................................................................................................... 10 5 MITIGATION MEASURES AND RESIDUAL RISK ....................................................................... 12 5.1 Overland flood flow ................................................................................................................. 12 5.2 Finished floor levels ................................................................................................................ 12 5.3 Flood compensation ............................................................................................................... 12 5.4 Safe access/egress ................................................................................................................ 12 6 PLANNING CONTEXT ................................................................................................................... 13 6.1 Application of planning policy ................................................................................................. 13 6.2 Land use vulnerability ............................................................................................................. 13 7 SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT .......................................................................... 14 7.1 Scope ..................................................................................................................................... 14 7.2 Pre-development situation ...................................................................................................... 14 7.3 Off site discharge options and limits....................................................................................... 15 7.4 Post-development situation .................................................................................................... 16 7.5 Water quality ........................................................................................................................... 18 7.6 Foul drainage provision .......................................................................................................... 20 8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................. 21 9 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 23 TABLES Table 6.1: Flood risk vulnerability and flood zone ‘compatibility’ .......................................................... 13 Table 7.1: Existing and proposed site areas ......................................................................................... 14 Table 7.2: IOH 124 surface water runoff (greenfield) ........................................................................... 14 Table 7.3: Modified Rational Method pre-development surface water runoff ....................................... 15 Table 7.4: Quick storage estimates ...................................................................................................... 17 Table 7.5: Extract of SuDS Manual Table 26.2: Pollution hazard indices for different land use classifications ........................................................................................................................................ 19 PREC Red Lion Propco 2. i Site at Lombard Wall, Charlton Flood Risk Assessment & Indicative Surface Water Drainage Strategy 134026-R1(2)-FRA Table 7.6: Extract of Table 26.3: Indicative SuDS mitigation indices for discharges to surface waters .............................................................................................................................................................. 19 Table 8.1: Flood risk summary .............................................................................................................. 21 FIGURES Figure 2.1: Site location plan................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 4.1: Environment Agency ‘Flood map for planning’ ..................................................................... 6 Figure 4.2: Environment Agency ‘Flood risk from surface water’ map ................................................... 8 Figure 4.3: Environment Agency ‘Flood risk from reservoirs’ map ....................................................... 10 APPENDICES APPENDIX A RSK GROUP SERVICE CONSTRAINTS APPENDIX B TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY APPENDIX C THAMES WATER ASSET PLANS APPENDIX D PROPOSALS APPENDIX E ENVIRONMENT AGENCY DATA APPENDIX F GREENWICH COUNCIL PRE-APPLICATION RESPONSE APPENDIX G CALCULATIONS APPENDIX H INDICATIVE SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE STRATEGY APPENDIX I GREENWICH SUDS PRO-FORMA PREC Red Lion Propco 2. ii Site at Lombard Wall, Charlton Flood Risk Assessment & Indicative Surface Water Drainage Strategy 134026-R1(2)-FRA 1 INTRODUCTION RSK Land and Development Engineering Ltd were commissioned by PREC Red Lion Propco 2 (the client) to provide a Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) and Indicative Surface Water Drainage Strategy to support the planning application at Lombard Wall, Charlton (the site). Development proposals include the demolition of the existing building and the construction of a new flexible B2/B8 unit and associated car parking and servicing areas. The purpose of the FRA is to establish the risk associated with the proposed development and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Tuesday Volume 661 4 June 2019 No. 307 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 4 June 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE CABINET (FORMED BY THE RT HON. THERESA MAY, MP, JUNE 2017) PRIME MINISTER,FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY AND MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE—The Rt Hon. Theresa May, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE DUCHY OF LANCASTER AND MINISTER FOR THE CABINET OFFICE—The Rt Hon. David Lidington, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER—The Rt Hon. Philip Hammond, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT—The Rt Hon. Sajid Javid, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon Jeremy Hunt, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION—The Rt Hon. Stephen Barclay, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN AND EQUALITIES—The Rt Hon. Penny Mordaunt, MP LORD CHANCELLOR AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE—The Rt Hon. David Gauke, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE—The Rt Hon. Matt Hancock, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS,ENERGY AND INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY—The Rt Hon. Greg Clark, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD OF TRADE—The Rt Hon. Liam Fox, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WORK AND PENSIONS—The Rt Hon. Amber Rudd, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EDUCATION—The Rt Hon. Damian Hinds, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT,FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Charlton Riverside SPD
    Charlton Riverside SPD Draft February 2017 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Vision and Objectives 2 3 Context 13 4 Development Concept 29 5 Theme 1 – A Residentially Diverse Charlton Riverside 41 6 Theme 2 – An Economically Active Charlton Riverside 49 7 Theme 3 – A Connected and Accessible Charlton Riverside 61 8 Theme 4 – An Integrated and Lifetime Ready Charlton Riverside 73 Draft9 Theme 5 – A Well-designed Charlton Riverside 87 10 Theme 6 – A Sustainable and Resilient Charlton Riverside 113 11 Theme 7 – A Viable and Deliverable Charlton Riverside 121 12 Illustrative Masterplan 135 Appendices Charlton Riverside SPD | February 2017 iii List of Figures Figure Page Figure Page Figure Page 1.1 SPD Area 3 5.4 Development densities 47 8.7 Green Bridge Option 1 83 1.2 Basis of this SPD and how it should be used 5 6.1 Existing land use (at ground floor) 50 8.8 Green Bridge Option 2 84 3.1 The City in the East 14 6.2 Economic activity at Charlton Riverside 52 8.9 Green Crossing 85 3.2 Charlton Riverside 15 6.3 Angerstein and Murphy’s Wharves 53 9.1 Character areas 88 3.3 Economic activity at Charlton Riverside 17 6.4 Riverside Wharf 54 9.2 Neighbourhood and local centres 91 3.4 Existing building heights 18 6.5 Proposed ground floor uses 55 9.3 Neighbourhood Centre/High Street 92 3.5 Flood risk 20 6.6 Proposed upper floor uses 56 9.4 Retail and commercial uses 93 3.6 Public Transport Accessibility Level (PTAL) 21 6.7 Employment locations 57 9.5 Historic assets map 95 3.7 Existing open space 22 7.1 Proposed network of streets 62 9.6 Block structure
    [Show full text]
  • 0103/VW/Cw/Cj Your Ref: N/A Email: [email protected] Date: 02 March 2018
    Bramah House, 65-71 Bermondsey Street London SE1 3XF T: 020 3096 7000 W: www.firstplan.co.uk Our Ref: 0103/VW/cw/cj Your Ref: n/a Email: [email protected] Date: 02 March 2018 Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London) New London Plan GLA City Hall London Plan Team Post Point 18 FREEPOST RTJC-XBZZ_GJKZ London SE1 2AA Submitted by email only: [email protected] Dear Sir/ Madam, REPRESENTATIONS ON BEHALF OF AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES UK LTD TO THE DRAFT NEW LONDON PLAN (ISSUED FOR CONSULTATION DECEMBER 2017) 1. Introduction and Context We are instructed by Aggregate Industries UK Ltd (AI) to submit representations to the Draft New London Plan, which was issued for consultation on 1 December 2017. Aggregate Industries are at the frontline of the construction and infrastructure industries, producing and supplying an array of construction materials. With over 330 sites and more than 4100 dedicated employees, they produce everything from aggregates, asphalt, ready-mixed concrete and precast concrete products. AI also produce, import and supply materials for cement and offer national road surfacing and contracting services. Within London AI import significant amounts of material via their safeguarded wharf and railhead sites. These sites also tend to accommodate and co-locate a range of associated mineral plant/infrastructure including for the purposes of concrete batching, operated under the name London Concrete, asphalt production and minerals recycling. To assist in understanding the AI sites and operations within London, a ‘Site Overview for London Plan’ document has been produced by AI and is attached at Document 1. This in particular highlights the significant issues the operator has had in protecting their operations and sites.
    [Show full text]
  • A Consultation Report Here
    Charlton Draft Masterplan Consultation Report October 2016 Conversations CHARLTON CONVERSATIONS ANCHOR & HOPE LANE Draft Masterplan Consultation Report September - October 2016 Page 1 View of the Thames Barrier Charlton Contents October 2016 Conversations Contents 1 | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 05 2 | BACKGROUND & CONTEXT 11 3 | CONSULTATION PROCESS 19 4 | FINDINGS 25 5 | RESPONDING TO KEY ISSUES & NEXT STEPS 45 Page 3 Charlton Contents October 2016 Conversations Draft Proposal exhibition September 2016 Page 4 Charlton Executive summary October 2016 Conversations Chapter 01 Executive summary Summary of activities Overview • 7500 Leaflets delivered Charlton Conversations is a process of • 3 Draft Proposal exhibitions community consultation on a number development sites within the wider • Online survey Charlton Riverside regeneration area. • 2 ‘Walk & Talks’ The first sites to come forward are the ‘Anchor & Hope Lane sites’. In September • Dedicated neighbours engagement and October 2016 we held the initial stage of consultation to raise awareness and • Business drop-in gather feedback on the Draft Proposals. • One -to-one meetings Rockwell Residential, the developer, and the project team are using the feedback • Stakeholder mapping received to help inform the plans before they are submitted for planning. • Project website This report explains the process, shares the findings and looks at next steps; setting-out a series of key questions for Rockwell to respond to. Thank you We would like to thank everyone who has taken part in the consultation process
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Eleven - Death and Aftermath
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Widening circles in finance, philanthropy and the arts. A study of the life of John Julius Angerstein 1735-1823 Twist, A.F. Publication date 2002 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Twist, A. F. (2002). Widening circles in finance, philanthropy and the arts. A study of the life of John Julius Angerstein 1735-1823. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:01 Oct 2021 CHAPTER ELEVEN - DEATH AND AFTERMATH I ANGERSTEIN'S DEATH Four days after the family visit to Lee, and after no more than what seems to have been a brief illness, John Julius Angerstein died. Emilia Boucherett wrote to Lawrence: All our hopes of yesterday my Dear Sir are destroyed for ever, dear good Mr Angerstein without any suffering has ceased to be.
    [Show full text]
  • London Plan Implementation Report Safeguarded Wharves on the River Thames Mayor of London 1
    London Plan Implementation Report Safeguarded Wharves on the River Thames London Plan Implementation Report January 2005 Cover photo stories: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 JJ Prior delivering aggregates to RMC Fulham (Comley’s Wharf). The aggregates, sand and gravel, originate from Prior’s quarry at Fingringhoe on the River Colne near Colchester. Prior owns seven aggregate vessels ranging in size from 250 to 600 tonne cargo carrying capacity. The vessels load directly from the quarry and delivery direct to upriver aggregates facilities, carrying approximately 160,000 tonnes per year. These small ships make a huge contribution to keeping heavy lorries off London’s streets. In recognition of this, the company has received several Freight Facilities Grants towards the cost of vessel refurbishment. 2 A panorama of two safeguarded Wandsworth terminals: Cringle Dock, a waste transfer station owned by the Western Riverside Waste Authority and operated by Cory Environmental; and RMC Battersea, owned and operated as a concrete batching plant by RMC. These two berths primarily handle cargo that has been transhipped within the Port of London, sea-dredged aggregates and cement arriving at RMC Battersea from terminals in Greenwich, Northfleet and Greenhithe and household waste barged from Cringle Dock to Mucking in Essex. In 2001, over 375,000 tonnes of cargo was handled at these two terminals, which kept over 51,000 lorry movements of the capital’s streets. 3 A Cory Environmental owned tug pulling a pair of dumb barges upstream through Lambeth Bridge carrying empty containers for loading with household waste at two safeguarded water transfer stations in Wandsworth (Western Riverside Waste Transfer Station and Cringle Dock).
    [Show full text]
  • Safeguarded Wharves Review – 2018 Individual Site Assessments
    Safeguarded Wharves Review – 2018 Individual Site Assessments 1 Individual Site Assessments by sub-region West 1. Hurlingham 4 2. Swedish 7 3. Comley’s 10 4. Smuggler’s Way 13 5. Pier 16 6. Cringle Dock 19 7. Kirtling 22 8. Middle 25 9. Cremorne 28 10. Walbrook 31 South East 11. Convoys 34 12. Brewery 37 13. Tunnel 40 14. Victoria Deep Water Terminal 43 15. Angerstein 46 16. Murphy’s 49 17. Riverside 52 18. Middleton 55 19. Mulberry 58 20. Pioneer 61 21. Albion 64 22. Erith 67 23. Railway 70 24. Town 73 25. Standard 76 North East 26. Northumberland 79 27. Orchard 82 28. Priors 85 29. Mayer Parry 88 30. Thames 91 31. Peruvian 94 31A.Royal Primrose 97 32. Manhattan 100 33. Sunshine 103 34. Thames Refinery 106 35. Welbeck 109 36. Alexander 112 37. Pinns 115 38. Steel 118 39. Rippleway 121 40. Docklands 124 41. Victoria Stone 127 42. DePass 130 43. Dagenham 133 44. Pinnacle Terminal 135 2 45. No.1 Western Extension 138 46. East Jetty 140 47. No.4 Jetty 142 48. Ford Dagenham Terminal 145 49. Phoenix 148 50. Halfway 150 3 1. Hurlingham 4 Address Carnwath Road, London SW6 Local Authority Hammersmith & Fulham Grid reference E 525,603/ N 175,568 Site area 0.51 ha Boundary Change None Road Access Access to Carnwath Road from north via Wandsworth Bridge Road, A217 (SRN) with connections to New Kings Road, A308 (SRN), access from south via Wandsworth Bridge Road, A217 (SRN) Congestion (delay Wandsworth Brdige Road A217 between j/w York Road (A3205) and in minutes/km) j/w King’s Road (A308): North bound: 0.5 to over 1.5 South bound 0.5 to over 1.5 Rail Access N/A Comments Wandsworth Bridge Road, A217 (SRN) offers connections to west and southwest London via junctions with A308 (SRN), A3 (TLRN), and a number of other strategic routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of London Authority Handbook 2017
    PLA cover 2017:PLA 2015 dummy cover 20/12/16 14:12 Page 3 Portof London Authority Handbook 2017 Your total solution provider for your dredging, environmental & marine engineering projects in the UK Port of London Authority Handbook 2017 NewWaves Solutions is the operating company of the DEME Group in the UK and is your gateway to all of DEME’s capabilities. From our office at Canary Wharf, London, we strive to offer specialised solutions to meet our clients’ needs. Our expertise and experience were called upon for the largest marine construction contract in the UK, the London Gateway Port Project for DP World. NewWaves Solutions’ successful involvement in this flagship contract has demonstrated its capability to take a leading role in solving the largest and most complex marine dredging challenges. Thanks to the multidisciplinary capabilities of the DEME Group, NewWaves Solutions can offer a wide range of services for UK projects, such as services in the environmental field, dredging & land reclamation, sea aggregate winning, complex marine construction, offshore Compass heavy-lifting and a wide range of new activities in the field of energy and mining. NewWaves Solutions Ltd. Member of the DEME Group Suite 37 . Beaufort Court . Admirals Way . London . E14 9XL T +44 (0)20 7531 1904 . [email protected] . www.deme-group.com/newwaves DEME: creating land for the future PLA adv NewWaves.indd 1 10/11/16 13:27 17 Published in association with The Port of London Authority by Compass Publications Ltd Publisher James P Moriarty Sales Director Andy Bullen Editorial Felicity Landon Photography Alistair Gale Andrew Christy Andy Wallace Ben Fitzpatrick DP World London Gateway Port Mark Taylor (Leigh-on-Sea Photography) Port of Tilbury Samuel Ashfield Thames Oilport Tideway Viking Cruises Book Design Pearce Marchbank Production Editor Linda Roast Cartographer Lee Ash Mark Terrey Print Swallowtail Print The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the publisher, the Port of London Authority, nor any other organisation associated with this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Mv SAND KITE
    ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT REGIONS Marine Accident Report 2/99 Report of the Inspector's Inquiry into the collision of mv SAND KITE with the THAMES FLOOD BARRIER on 27 October 1997 MAIB is an INVESTOR IN PEOPLE April 1999 Marine Accident Investigation Branch of the Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions: London Marine Accident Investigation Branch Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions Carlton House Carlton Place Southampton SO15 2DZ 8 March, 1999 The Right Honourable John Prescott MP Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions Sir I have the honour to submit the Marine Accident Investigation Branch report on the collision of mv Sand Kite with the Thames Flood Barrier on 27 October 1997. I have the honour to be Sir Your obedient servant J S Lang Rear Admiral Chief Inspector of Marine Accidents Extract from The Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 1994 The fundamental purpose of investigating an accident under these Regulations is to determine its circumstances and the causes with the aim of improving the safety of life at sea and the avoidance of accidents in the future. It is not the purpose to apportion liability, nor, except so far as is necessary to achieve the fundamental purpose, to apportion blame. CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS 7 SY N0 PSIS 9 VESSEL AND INCIDENT PARTICULARS 11 SECTION 1 FACTUAL INFORMATION 13 1.1 Background to the Voyage 13 1.2 Narrative of Events - Vessel and TBNC 13 1.3 Regulation and
    [Show full text]
  • Road Safety Standard for Construction, Supply and Waste Sites
    Summary report Submitted to Submitted by Transport for London AECOM 12 Regan Way Chilwell Nottingham NG9 6RZ United Kingdom Road safety standards for construction, supply and waste sites AECOM Page i Prepared by: Matthew Wainwright and Joanne Edwards Checked by: Johan Els Approved by: Paul Edwards 12 Regan Way, Chilwell, Nottingham, NG9 6RZ, United Kingdom Telephone: 0115 907 7000 Website: http://www.aecom.com Road safety standards for construction, supply and waste sites December 2016 AECOM Page ii Limitations AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Transport for London in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by AECOM. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by AECOM has not been independently verified by AECOM, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by AECOM in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken between December 2015 and August 2016 and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time.
    [Show full text]
  • VIP Trading Estate and VIP Industrial Estate, Charlton in the Royal Borough of Greenwich
    1 SPD Draft London Plan London Plan representation hearing report GLA/3800/03 29 January 2019 VIP Trading Estate and VIP Industrial Estate, Charlton in the Royal Borough of Greenwich planning application no. 16/4008/F Planning application Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 (“the Order”). The proposal Demolition of existing buildings and erection of 11 buildings ranging from 2 to 10 storeys in height for Class C3 residential use (771 units), with flexible uses comprising Class B1 (Business), Class A1- A3 (Retail / Restaurant), Class D1 (Community) and Class D2 (Leisure) at ground floor and first floor level, alterations to existing vehicular access and creation of new pedestrian access from Anchor and Hope Lane and the riverside, creation of new areas of open space and landscaping together with the provision of associated car parking, cycle spaces, refuse and recycling storage, plant and all other associated works. The applicant The applicants are Leopard Guernsey Anchor Propco Ltd and the architect is Simpson Haugh and Partners. Recommendation summary The Mayor of London, acting as Local Planning Authority for the purpose of determining this application, i. grants conditional planning permission in respect of application 16/4008/F for the reasons set out in the reasons for approval section below, and subject to the prior completion of a section 106 legal agreement; ii. delegates authority to the Assistant Director - Planning or the Executive Director of Development, Enterprise and Environment to issue the planning permission and agree, add, delete or vary, the final detailed wording of the conditions and informatives as required, and authority to negotiate, agree the final wording, and sign and execute, the section 106 legal agreement; page 1 iii.
    [Show full text]
  • London Aggregates Working Party LAWP 14/01 April 2014
    London Aggregates Monitoring 2013 London Aggregates Working Party LAWP 14/01 April 2014 - 0 - Contents Executive Summary 3 1 London Aggregates Working Party 6 2 Scope of this Report 6 3 The National Planning Policy Framework 7 4 London Plan 8 5 Quarries 9 Land-won sand and gravel 6 Wharves 10 Landings of marine dredged sand and gravel Crushed rock imports Land-won sand and gravel 7 Rail Depots 10 Crushed rock Land-won sand and gravel Marine dredged sand and gravel 8 Aggregates Recycling 11 9 Environment 11 10 Aggregate Consumption 12 11 Local Plans and Local Aggregate Assessments 12 12 National and Local Needs 14 Tables 1 Quarries: Sand and Gravel – Sales, Permissions and Reserves 2004-2013 15 2 Quarries: Sales of Sand and Gravel 2004-2013 16 3 Quarries: Sand and Gravel Apportionment, Sales and Landbank 2004-2013 17 4 Wharves: Sales of Marine Dredged Sand and Gravel, Crushed Rock and Land-won Sand and Gravel 2004-2013 18 5 Rail Depots: Sales of Crushed Rock, Land-won Sand and Gravel and Marine Dredged Sand and Gravel 2004-2013 19 Figures 1 London : Active Quarries, Wharves and Rail Depots 20 2 Quarries: Sales of Land-won Sand and Gravel compared with Permissions 2004-2013 21 3 Quarries: Reserves of Land-won Sand and Gravel 2004-2013 22 4 Wharves: Sales of Marine Dredged Sand and Gravel, Crushed Rock and Land-won Sand and Gravel 2004-2013 23 5 Rail Depots: Sales of Crushed Rock, Marine Dredged Sand and Gravel and Land-won Sand and Gravel 2004-2013 24 Appendices A Active and Inactive Aggregate Quarries, Wharves and Rail Depots at end 2013 25 B Planning Applications: Permissions, Refusals, Undetermined and Withdrawn Applications in 2013 28 C Key Milestones for Minerals in Local Plans April 2014 29 2 Executive Summary This AM2013 report for London has been prepared from returns made by the operators of quarries, wharves and rail depots in London in response to a London wide survey, together with data on applications from London Boroughs.
    [Show full text]