London Aggregates Working Party LAWP 13/04 July 2013

London Aggregates Monitoring 2012

- 0 -

Contents

Executive Summary 3

1 London Aggregates Working Party 6 2 Scope of this Report 6 3 The National Planning Policy Framework 7 4 London Plan 8 5 Quarries 9 Land-won sand and gravel 6 Wharves 9 Landings of marine dredged sand and gravel Crushed rock imports Land-won sand and gravel 7 Rail Depots 10 Crushed rock Land-won sand and gravel Marine dredged sand and gravel 8 Aggregates Recycling 11 9 Environment 11 10 Aggregate Consumption 11 11 Local Plans 12

Tables 1 Quarries: Sand and Gravel – Sales, Permissions and Reserves 2003-2012 13 2 Quarries: Sales of Sand and Gravel 2003-2012 14 3 Quarries: Sand and Gravel Landbank 2003-2012 15 4 Wharves: Sales of Marine Dredged Sand and Gravel, Crushed Rock and Land-won Sand and Gravel 2003-2012 16 5 Rail Depots: Sales of Crushed Rock, Land-won Sand and Gravel and Marine Dredged Sand and Gravel 2003-2012 17

Figures 1 London : Active Quarries, Wharves and Rail Depots 18 2 Quarries: Sales of Land-won Sand and Gravel compared with Permissions 2003-2012 19 3 Quarries: Reserves of Land-won Sand and Gravel 2003-2012 20 4 Wharves: Sales of Marine Dredged Sand and Gravel, Crushed Rock and Land-won Sand and Gravel 2003-2012 21 5 Rail Depots: Sales of Crushed Rock, Marine Dredged Sand and Gravel and Land-won Sand and Gravel 2003-2012 22

Appendices

A Active and Inactive Aggregate Quarries, Wharves and Rail Depots at end 2012 23 B Planning Applications: Permissions, Refusals, Undetermined and Withdrawn Applications in 2012. 26 C Key Milestones for Minerals in Local Plans July 2013 27

Executive Summary

This AM2012 report for London has been prepared from returns made by the operators of quarries, wharves and rail depots in London in response to a London wide survey, together with data on applications from London Boroughs. The report also puts the findings in the context of the National Planning Policy Framework, the Guidance on the Managed Aggregates Supply System and the London Plan.

The National Planning Policy Framework

 The NPPF requires MPAs to make provision for a steady and adequate supply of minerals; to define mineral safeguarding areas; to safeguard wharves, rail heads and certain aggregate processing facilities and plant  The NPPF requires MPAs to participate in an Aggregates Working Party; to prepare an annual Local Aggregates Assessment; to make provision for the land won or other elements of their LAA in their mineral plans, taking account of the advice of the AWP and the National Aggregate Coordinating Group (NCG) as appropriate.

Guidance on the Managed Aggregate Supply System

 AWPs are to produce an annual report on minerals activity in their area, provide technical advice to MPAs on the adequacy of an LAA, and provide an assessment on the position of overall demand and supply in its area, including whether, in its view, the area is making a full contribution towards meeting both national and local needs

London Plan

 The Plan requires four London Boroughs to make provision together for a landbank of at least 5Mt of land–won aggregate through designations in their local development documents, and maintain that level of provision throughout the plan period to 2031. This in effect requires a provision to be made London- wide for at least 0.7mtpa.

Land-won Sand and Gravel

 Sales in 2012 were some 0.3Mt tonnes, less than 50% of the provision sought in the London Plan. This is the lowest land-won sales in the last decade, less than half the average sales for the preceding four years.

 Permitted reserves of sand and gravel now stand at 1.2Mt, limiting any potential for the London Plan provision being met unless further applications are made and permissions granted.

Marine Dredged Sand and Gravel

 Sales of marine dredged sand and gravel from London wharves was some 3.8Mt in 2012, a 4% increase on the 2011 figure.

 London continues to be heavily dependent on marine aggregate which now provides 45% of its primary aggregate supplies.

Imports of Crushed Rock

 Sales of crushed rock from rail depots and wharves in London in 2012 amounted to 3.4Mt, a substantial decrease of 0.6Mt compared with the 2011 figure.

 Some 85% of all the crushed rock to rail depots was imported from the South West and East Midlands.

Aggregate Recycling

 It is estimated by GLA that 7.9Mt of CDEW produced in London in 2012 was recycled, largely as aggregate, providing some 40% of London’s aggregate supply.

Environment

 All the sand and gravel quarries in London, hence all the 0.3Mt sand and gravel sales and the 1.2 Mt of reserves, are in the Metropolitan Green Belt

 In contrast, all the R Thames wharves and rail depots are in the built up area. None are in the Metropolitan Green Belt or in a site covered by a national environmental designation, such as an SSSI or NNR.

 Over 7Mt, 85%, of primary aggregate supplies are transported to London by sea or by rail

Aggregate Consumption

 The 2012 survey did not include detailed data that would provide accurate consumption figures for London.

 Comparing the data recorded in 2012 with that in the wider survey of 2009 which included figures for cross boundary movements, it is likely that London primary aggregate consumption was less than 9Mt in 2012.

Local Plans

 Three of the four named London Boroughs in the London Plan have adopted Core Strategies, but only LB Redbridge has an adopted Minerals Plan.

 The delay by three London Boroughs in submitting and adopting plans with allocations for minerals, and the lack of planning applications by industry in response to the adopted minerals plan are contributory factors to the low sales figure and the London Plan provisions not being met.

1. London Aggregates Working Party

1.1 The London Aggregates Working Party (LAWP) was formed in 2003, completing the coverage of Aggregate Working Parties (AWPs) for all of England. The Working Party is drawn from officers of the mineral planning authorities (MPAs) in London (the London Boroughs), the Greater London Authority (GLA), the minerals industry through the Mineral Products Association (mpa) and the British Aggregates Association (BAA), and government representatives from the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG). The Crown Estate, the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) and Port of London Authority (PLA) are also represented, together with representative from adjoining AWPs in eastern and south east England.

1.2 The working party is a technical advisory body with the task of monitoring the supply and demand for aggregates at the London wide scale. LAWP advises both the GLA, which is responsible for the London Plan including minerals policies for London, and government through DCLG and the National Aggregates Coordinating Group.

2. Scope of this report

2.1 As with previous AM surveys, this AM2012 report is primarily a monitor at the London wide scale. Data on primary aggregates sales from land-won sand and gravel sites, wharves and rail depots for 2012 has been provided by operators via the AWP technical secretary who collated the individual site returns. The PLA has also assisted with data on wharves. Only three boroughs have active sand and gravel workings, but four times as many have one or more wharves and/or rail depots. An inventory of quarries, wharves and rail depots is provided in Appendix A.

2.2 AM2012 also provides an update on the progress of Local Plans for those boroughs with aggregate resources – see section 11 below and Appendix C.

2.3 The planning context for this report is the National Planning Policy Framework1 (NPPF) and Guidance on the Managed Aggregate Supply System2 at the national

1 National Planning Policy Framework, DCLG March 2012 2 Guidance on the Managed Aggregate Supply System, DCLG October 2012 6

level, and the London Plan3 published in July 2011 as the overall strategic plan for the capital.

3. The National Planning Policy Framework

3.1 The NPPF states that minerals are essential to support economic growth and our quality of life. MPAs should, inter alia: - identify and include policies for extraction of mineral resource of local and national importance in their area whilst taking account of the contribution that substitute or secondary materials might make to mineral supplies, - define Mineral Safeguarding Areas and adopt appropriate policies in order that mineral resources are not needlessly sterilised, - safeguard existing planned and potential rail heads, links to quarries, wharfage and processing facilities for bulk transport by rail, sea or inland waterways of minerals, including recycled, secondary and marine-dredged materials - safeguard planned and potential sites for concrete batching, the manufacture of coated materials, other concrete products and the handling, processing and distribution of substitute, recycled and secondary aggregate material - set out policies to encourage prior extraction of minerals where practicable and environmentally feasible - recognise that some noisy short term activities are unavoidable to facilitate minerals extraction - put in place policies to ensure that worked land is reclaimed at the earliest opportunity and that high quality restoration and aftercare takes place.

3.2 MPAs should plan for a steady and adequate supply of aggregates by - preparing an annual Local Aggregates Assessment (LAA), either individually or jointly by agreement with other MPAs - participate in the operation of an Aggregates Working Party and take the advice of the AWP into account when preparing their LAA - make provision for the land won and other elements of their LAA in their mineral plans, taking account of the advice of the AWP and the National Aggregate Coordinating Group (NCG) as appropriate.

3.3 Guidance on the Managed Aggregates Supply System (MASS) was issued in October 2012. The Guidance sets out a ‘bottom up’ process in which LAAs are a key element. The AWP will draw together the figures for all the LAAs of the

3 The London Plan; Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London, Mayor of London July 2011. 7

MPAs in its area and, when forwarding those figures to the NCG, will advise whether in its view the area is making a full contribution towards meeting both national and local needs. The NCG will consider whether the totals provided by the AWPs make appropriate provision to maintain a steady and adequate supply of aggregate.

4. The London Plan

4.1 The London Plan was prepared and adopted before the NPPF and MASS were issued. Policy 5.20 sets out the strategy to ensure an adequate supply of aggregates to support construction in London, including that London should make provision for the maintenance of a landbank (ie seven years supply) of at least 5 million tonnes of land-won aggregates throughout the plan period until 2031. Local Plans should make provision for maintenance of that landbank through an apportionment of: a at least 1.75 million tonnes to LB Havering b at least 0.7 million tonnes to LB Redbridge c at least 1.75 million tonnes to LB Hillingdon d at least 0.7 million tonnes to LB Hounslow (This in effect requires provision to be made London-wide for at least 0.7mtpa)

4.2 The Plan recognises that there remains some potential for extraction beyond the boroughs identified, including in the Lee Valley. Other boroughs with aggregate resources should consider opportunities in line with policies in the plan, including identifying and safeguarding aggregate resources in their Local Plans.

4.3 The London Plan reflects the NPPF in seeking to maximise recycling and re-use of construction and demolition waste to reduce demand on primary aggregates, and MPAs are to support the development of aggregate recycling facilities in their Local Plans, subject to local amenity conditions. In recognition of the heavy dependence of London on imports of hard rock and marine-dredged aggregate, the Plan requires the boroughs in their Local Plans to safeguard wharves and rail heads with existing or potential capacity for aggregate distribution. The Plan also reflects the NPPF in seeking a reduction in the environmental impact of aggregates through appropriate aftercare, restoration and re-use of mineral sites following extraction.

5. Quarries

Land-won Sand and Gravel

5.1 There were only 4 active sand and gravel quarries in Bromley, Havering and Hillingdon in London in 2012 (see Figure 1 and Appendix A). South Hall Farm and Spring Farm in LB Havering are paired to take advantage of using the same plant site.

5.2 Sales, permissions and reserves data for sand and gravel for the ten years 2003- 2012 are shown in Tables 1, 2 & 3 and Figures 2, 3 & 4. Sales were some 0.3Mt tonnes in 2012, compared to 0.8Mt last year.

5.3 No planning permissions for aggregate extraction were made last year and there were no submitted applications awaiting determination at the end of the year – see Table 1 and Figure 2. This reflects the pattern over the last 10 years with applications only granted in three of those years. Over 8Mt has been extracted over the decade, but less than 1.7Mt has been replaced. Reserves have declined from over 5Mt to 1.2Mt at the end of 2012 – see Table 3 and Figure 3.

5.4 There is no prospect of the provision of 0.7mtpa in the London Plan being achieved in the near future unless further planning applications are submitted and permitted. Three London Boroughs need to identify sites/areas in Local Plans in which applications for extraction would/might be acceptable, and industry needs to respond with applications for extraction – see section 11 below.

6. Wharves

Landings of Marine Dredged Sand and Gravel

6.1 There were 14 active wharves receiving aggregate via the R Thames in London in 2012 – see Appendix A. Eight of these landed some 3.8Mt of marine dredged sand and gravel – see Table 4 and Figure 4. This compares with landings of 3.6Mt in 2011, a 4% increase.

6.2 In 2012 three wharves together handled over 3Mt, over 80% of the total marine dredged aggregate landings.

6.3 The origin of the marine dredged sand and gravel landed at R Thames wharves is principally from the North Sea and Thames Estuary.

Crushed Rock Imports

6.4 Crushed rock was landed at 6 wharves in London in 2012. Sales at over 0.6Mt was the same level as in 2011 - see Table 4 and Figure 4.

6.5 100% of sales was recorded as sold for roadstone, railway ballast, concreting aggregate, armourstone or other screened and graded aggregate. Sources included North Wales, Northern Ireland, and Scotland via the Isle of Grain.

Land-won Sand and Gravel

6.6 Although most wharves primarily handle marine dredged sand and gravel or crushed rock, some 140,000 tonnes of land-won sand and gravel was received from Essex.

7. Rail Depots

Crushed Rock

7.1 There were 16 active rail depots in London in 2012 – see Appendix A. All of them handled some imported crushed rock, with sales amounting to some 2.8Mt, a decrease of 0.8Mt from the 2011 figure – see Table 5 and Figure 5. Four of the rail depots handled nearly 60% of the rock imports, each handling over 300,000 tonnes.

7.2 Some 2.4Mt of crushed rock, 85% of the total, was imported from the South West (1.8Mt) and East Midlands (0.6Mt), with the remainder from Wales, Scotland and Ireland.

Land-won Sand and Gravel

7.3 Five of the rail depots together handled some 115,000 tonnes of land-won sand and gravel in 2012. The majority of the material was from Dorset, with the rest from Bedfordshire, Kent, Essex and Norfolk combined.

Marine Dredged Sand and Gravel

7.4 In 2012 London rail depots handled some 1Mt of marine dredged aggregate, some 0.2Mt less than in 2011. Six depots handled some 86% of this total, each

handling over 100,000 tonnes or more. Some 2/3rd (0.65Mt) of the marine aggregate was received from wharves on R Thames in London, with 1/3rd (0.35Mt) from wharves in Kent and Medway. (NB. The 0.65Mt is already accounted for in the wharves figure of 3.8Mt in paragraph 6.1 above, and double counting needs to be avoided)

8. Aggregates Recycling

8.1 Recycled aggregates and secondary materials were not included in the AM2012 survey. However at the end of 2012 GLA estimated that of the 20Mt of waste produced in London, 48%, some 9.6Mt comprised CDEW. Some 82% of this, 7.9Mt was recycled, and 18%, 1.7Mt went to landfill. The objective is for 95% to be recycled by 2031 with over 80%, over 7Mt, recycled as aggregate.

8.2 On this basis in 2012 CDEW provided some 40% of London’s aggregate supply.

9. Environment

9.1 The 2012 returns show that all active and inactive sand and gravel quarries in London, and hence all the 0.3Mt sand and gravel sales and 1.2Mt reserves, are sites in the Metropolitan Green Belt. No national environmental designations such as SSSIs or NNRs were affected and none of the active aggregate wharves on R Thames or the rail depots are located in any national environmental designation or are in the MGB. Over 8Mt of primary aggregate supply for the capital is transported by sea or rail to London wharves and rail depots.

10. Aggregate Consumption

10.1 The AM2009 four yearly national survey of primary aggregates showed that London consumed 9.4Mt of primary aggregates in that year, 1.5Mt of land-won sand and gravel, 3.8Mt of marine dredged sand and gravel and 4.1Mt of crushed rock.

10.2 The 2012 survey does not include data to give accurate consumption figures. However, the 2012 data shows that compared to 2009, although imports of marine dredged sand and gravel have increased by 0.1Mt, land won sales are

0.2Mt lower, and crushed rock imports 0.8Mt lower. Even if land-won consumption stayed at the same level as in 2009 it appears likely that London consumed less than 9Mt in 2012.

11. Local Plans

11.1 Three of the four key Boroughs named in the London Plan, LB Havering and LB Redbridge in east London, and LB Hillingdon in west London, have adopted Core Strategies which include policies for minerals, but only LB Redbridge has an adopted Minerals Plan. LB Hillingdon and Hounslow intend to progress Local Plans from May 2013 which will include minerals and site allocations. LB Havering is no longer progressing a sites plan; minerals and site allocations will be part of a Local Plan forming a review of the Core Strategy.

11.2 The delay in minerals plan preparation and submission in three Boroughs is a contributory factor to the landbank of permitted reserves and sales falling well below the London Plan figures. However this does not apply in LB Redbridge, and the lack of planning applications from industry is also a contributory factor.

Table 1: Quarries: Sand and Gravel Sales, Permissions and Reserves 2003-2012 (thousand tonnes)

Sand and Gravel or hoggin for Soft Sand (Building Sand) Sharp Sands & Gravels Total–All Sands and Gravels constructional fill

sales permissio reserves sales reserves sales reserves sales reserves during ns during at end of during permissions at end of during permissions at end of during permissions at end year year year year year during year year year during year year year during year of year

2003 38 0 60 962 0 4,282 0 0 938 1,000 0 5,280

2004 0 0 33 1,086 0 3,196 0 0 781 1,086 0 4,010

2005 c 0 c c 0 c 16 0 0 1,038 0 2,866

2006 110 0 421 845 910 1,979 3 0 24 957 910 3,084

2007 c 0 c c 0 1,722 0 0 0 1,142 0 2,052

2008 82 0 233 741 176 1,244 3 0 35 826 176 1,512

2009 68 0 171 509 600 1,810 2 0 0 577 600 1,981

2010 c 0 c c 0 c 0 0 0 679 0 1,380

2011 c 0 c c 0 c 0 0 0 658 0 1,120

2012 c 0 c c 0 c c 0 c 320 0 1,180 Average Sales 2003- 2012 54 - - 771 - - 3 - - 828 - -

Table 2: Quarries: Sales of Sand and Gravel 2003-2012 (thousand tonnes)

Soft Sand (Building Total–All Sands and Sharp Sands and Gravels Sand) Gravels

% change from year year sales % total sales sales % total sales sales before

2003 38 4.0% 962 96.0% 1,000 -9.0%

2004 0 0.0% 1,086 100.0% 1,086 8.6%

2005 c c c c 1,038 -4.4%

2006 110 11.0% 848 89.0% 957 -7.8%

2007 c c c c 1,142 19.0%

2008 82 10.0% 741 90.0% 826 -28.0%

2009 68 12.0% 509 88.0% 577 -30.0%

2010 c c c c 679 18.0%

2011 c c c c 658 -3.1%

2012 c c c c 320 -51% Average Sales 2003-2012 54 774 828

Source: Table 1 of this report

Table 3: Quarries: Sand and Gravel Landbank 2003- 2012 (years)

All Sand and Gravels Landbank Reserves at end of Apportionment* (thousand year Year (million tonnes) tonnes) (years)

2003 1.0 5,130 5.1

2004 1.0 4,010 4.0

2005 1.0 2,866 2.9

2006 1.0 3,084 3.1

2007 1.0 2,052 2.1

2008 1.0 1,512 1.5

2009 1.0 1,981 2.0

2010 0.7 1,380 2.0

2011 0.7 1,120 1.6

2012 0.7 1.180 1.7 % Change 2003- 2012 -77%

Source: * apportionment in London Plan Table 1 of this report

Table4: Wharves: Sales of Marine Dredged Sand and Gravel, Crushed Rock and Land-won Sand and Gravel 2003-2012 (thousand tonnes)

Marine Dredged Crushed Rock Land-won Sand All Sand and Gravel Imports and Gravel Aggregates

% Change from % Total % Total % Total Year Year Sales Sales Sales Sales Sales Sales Sales before

2003 3,902 75.0% 1,149 22.0% 159 3.0% 5,210 3.0%

2004 3,638 79.0% 794 17.0% 179 4.0% 4,611 -12.0%

2005 3,906 87.0% 413 9.0% 156 4.0% 4,475 -3.0%

2006 3,651 77.0% 671 14.0% 436 9.0% 4,758 6.0%

2007 4,132 88.0% 425 9.0% 128 3.0% 4,685 -3.0%

2008 4,350 89.0% 360 7.0% 202 4.0% 4,912 5.0%

2009* 3,516 87.0% 359 9.0% 146 4.0% 4,021 -18.0%

2010 3,007 85.0% 379 11.0% 135 4.0% 3,521 -12.0%

2011 3,638 82.0% 655 15.0% 160 3.0% 4,453 26.0%

2012 3,775 83% 629 14% 144 3.0% 4,548 2.0%

Average 3,752 83.0% 583 13.0% 185 4.0% 4,519

Source: AM surveys 2003-2012 * AM2009 did not distinguish land-won from marine, so 4% applied for land-won

Table5: Rail Depots: Sales of Crushed Rock, and Land-won Sand and Gravel and Marine Dredged Sand and Gravel 2003-2012 (thousand tonnes)

Crushed Rock Marine Dredged Land-won Sand All Aggregates Imports Sand and Gravel and Gravel

% Total % Total % Total Year Sales Sales Sales Sales Sales Sales Sales

2003 3,581 76.9% 487 10.5% 585 12.6% 4,653

2004 3,444 72.5% 768 16.2% 536 11.3% 4,748

2005 2,662 66.8% 969 24.3% 355 8.9% 3,986

2006 3,137 69.0% 889 20.0% 518 11.0% 4,544 4,714 2007 3,152 67.0% 1303 28.0% 259 5.0% 4,928 2008 3,391 69.0% 1165 23.0% 372 8.0% 3,515 2009 2,370 67.0% 953 27.0% 192 6.0% 3,693 2010 2,608 71.0% 938 25.0% 147 4.0% 4,955 2011 3,580 72.0% 1258 25.0% 117 3.0%

2012 2,777 71% 1,021 26% 115 3.0% 3,913 Average Sales 3,070 70.0% 975 22.0% 320 8.0% 4,365

Source: AM Surveys 2003-2012

Appendix A

Active and Inactive Aggregate Quarries, Wharves and Rail Depots at end 2012

Sand and Gravel Quarries

Borough Company Aggregate Grid Ref. LB Bromley

Bourne Wood Bournewood S&G Ltd Soft sand 51 503 682

LB Havering

South Hall Farm & Havering Aggregates Sharp sand & gravel 51 534 818 Spring Farm Ltd

LB Hillingdon

Sipson (including Henry Streeter Ltd Sharp sand & gravel 51 075 784 Wall Garden Farm)

Harlington Henry Streeter Ltd Sharp sand & gravel 51 091 783

LB Redbridge

Fairlop Quarry Brett Lafarge Ltd Sharp sand & gravel 51 470 902

Aggregate Wharves

LB Barking & Dagenham Dagenham Dock Hanson Aggregates Marine 51 491 816 Dagenham Dock CEMEX Crushed rock 51 481 821 Eurovia (No1 Western Eurovia Roadstone Crushed rock 51 488 818 Extension) LB Bexley Erith/Pioneer Wharf Tarmac Ltd Marine 51 508 797 Conway Wharf, Erith FM Conway Crushed rock 51 509 791 LB Greenwich Murphy’s Greenwich Tarmac Ltd Marine 51 404 790 Wharf, Charlton

Riverside Wharf Tarmac Ltd Crushed rock 51 793 413 Victoria Deep Hanson Aggregates Crushed rock, 51 389 794 marine* Angerstein Wharf CEMEX Marine 51 403 791 Brewery Wharf JJ Prior Sand and Gravel 51 378 776 LB Newham Dock Entrance Wharf Euromix Marine* 51 422 798 Thames Wharf Keltbray Crushed Rock 51 422 798 LB Wandsworth Battersea Wharf CEMEX Marine* 51 292 776 (Cringle) Pier Wharf Hanson Aggregates Marine* 51 260 754

Aggregate Rail Depots

LB Barking & Dagenham

Dagenham Hanson Aggregates Crushed rock 51 811 491

LB Brent

Park Royal Tarmac Ltd Marine 51 195 826

Wembley Aggregate Industries Crushed rock and sand & gravel

LB Camden

Kings Cross Tarmac Ltd Marine* 51 300 838

Kings Cross Hanson Aggregates Marine* and cr rock 51 300 839

LB Croydon

Purley Day Aggregates Cr rock and marine* 51 315 615

LB Ealing

Acton Aggregate Industries Sand & gravel and 51 197 811 crushed rock

LB Greenwich

Angerstein Aggregate Industries Crushed rock 51 404 790

LB Hillingdon

West Drayton Hanson Aggregates Crushed rock 51 078 799

West Ruislip Yeoman Aggregates Crushed rock 51 089 865

Hayes Tarmac Ltd Crushed rock 51 106 795

LB Hounslow

Brentford Day Aggregates Crushed rock and 51 163 782 sand & gravel

LB Kingston upon Thames

Tolworth Day Aggregates Crushed rock and 51 198 655 marine

LB Tower Hamlets

Bow Aggregate Industries Crushed rock and 51 375 835 marine

LB Wandsworth

Battersea Day Aggregates Crushed rock and 51 289 773 marine*

Battersea Tarmac Ltd Marine * 51 291 767 * transported from another wharf

Appendix B

Aggregate Applications: Permitted, Refused, Undetermined or Withdrawn in 2012

Mineral NGR Applicant Site type Reserves Permitted, SSSI/ NNR SPA/ SAC Green Belt (tonnes) Refused, Undetermine d or Withdrawn Quarries none Wharves Capacity - none Rail Depots - none

Appendix C

Key Milestones for Minerals in Local Plans, July 2013

MPA Local Plan or SPD title Public Participation Publish Draft (Reg 19) Submission to Sec of Estimated date for Estimated date for (Reg 18) State independent Adoption (Reg 22) examination West London

Local Plan Part 1 (former Core Strategy) Adopted Nov 2012 LB Hillingdon Part 2: development management policies, site Apr-May 2013 Nov-Dec 2013 Spring 2014 Summer 2014

allocations & policies map Late 2014-Early 2015 LB Hounslow Local Plan (includes minerals and site allocations) May 2013 May 2014 Oct 2014 Jan 2015 Apr 2015 Core Strategy LB Ealing Adopted Dec 2011

Sept/Oct 2010 Mar/Apr 2012 July 2012 Nov/Dec 2012 (Revised Site Allocations and also Scheme) July 2013 Development Management DPD Core Strategy Adopted April 2009

Jan/March 2010 Oct 2010 Feb 2011 June 2011 LB Richmond Development Control Policies Nov 2011 upon Thames

Jan 2013 April 2013 July 2013 Sept 2013 Site allocations Jan 2014 East London Adopted Feb 2012

Core Strategy

LB Bexley Dec2012-Jan 2013 & Detailed Policies and Sites Oct 2014 May 2015 Aug/Sept 2015 Feb 2016 Aug/Sept 2013

Core Strategy DPD Adopted Mar 2008

LB Redbridge Borough-wide Primary Policies DPD Adopted May 2008

Minerals DPD Adopted 20 Sept 2012 Adopted July 2008

Core Strategy and Development Control Policies

DPD (includes minerals policies) LB Havering Site Specific Allocations DPD (not minerals) Adopted 2008

Mineral Sites DPD No longer progressing Mar-April 2012 Nov-Dec 2013 Apr 2013 Nov 2013 this sites DPD