DOCSLIB.ORG

Bringing the Electric Vehicle to the Mass Market: a Review of Barriers, Facilitators and Policy Interventions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bringing the Electric Vehicle to the Mass Market: a Review of Barriers, Facilitators and Policy Interventions WORKING P A P E R Bringing the electric vehicle to the mass market a review of barriers, facilitators and policy interventions FLAVIA TSANG JANICE S. PEDERSEN STEVEN WOODING DIMITRIS POTOGLOU WR-775 February 2012 Sponsored by RAND Europe's Direct Investment Programme This product is part of the RAND Europe working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers’ latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND Europe but have not been formally edited or peer reviewed. Unless otherwise indicated, working papers can be quoted and cited without permission of the author, provided the source is clearly referred to as a working paper. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. is a registered trademark. Preface This project is internally funded by RAND Europe's Direct Investment Programme and aims to develop an understanding of the factors affecting the wider adoption of electric vehicles. The project consists of two main phases: (i) a review of barriers and relevant government interventions; and (ii) a survey to determine the potential uptake of electric vehicles, using Cambridge, UK, as a case study. This Working Paper is the output from the first phase of the project. It provides an overview of the barriers and facilitators to the wider adoption of electric vehicles (EVs), and describes a variety of EV initiatives currently underway in a pragmatic selection of countries, namely the UK, France, Denmark, and Canada. Our research suggests that subsidising EV purchase costs means spending hundreds of millions of pounds of government funds, but that this would overcome a number of consumer barriers to wider EV uptake. We conclude that the development of recharging infrastructure, which is essential for EVs’ transition beyond the niche market, would rely on the success of public- private collaboration. Additionally, better information and more outreach programmes are needed to help consumers understand and take full advantage of existing EV technology. Finally, dependence on government support involves some uncertainties, especially in the current economic climate. While this review has been undertaken with the primary purpose of informing the design of a survey about the potential uptake of electric vehicles, it could also be used as a stand- alone resource for readers, researchers or policy makers with an interest in EV uptake and related policies. RAND Europe is an independent, not-for-profit policy research organisation that aims to improve policy and decision making in the public interest, through research and analysis. RAND Europe’s clients include European governments, institutions, NGOs and firms with a need for rigorous, independent, multidisciplinary analysis. This report has been peer-reviewed in accordance with RAND’s quality assurance standards. For more information about RAND Europe or this document, please contact: Dr. Dimitris Potoglou [email protected] RAND Europe Westbrook Centre, Milton Road Cambridge CB4 1YG UK Tel. +44 (1223) 353 329 iii Contents Preface......................................................................................................................... iii Contents ...................................................................................................................... v Table of Tables ........................................................................................................... vii List of abbreviations .................................................................................................... ix Executive summary ..................................................................................................... xi Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................... xv CHAPTER 1 Introduction .................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Why electric vehicles? ......................................................................................... 2 1.3.1 Types of electric vehicles ....................................................................... 3 1.3.2 Vehicles eligible for government incentive schemes in selected countries ............................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 2 Government motivations for EV market expansion .......................... 7 2.1 Governments’ motivations for EV market expansion .......................................... 7 2.1.1 Environmental concerns ....................................................................... 7 2.1.2 Economic concerns ............................................................................... 8 CHAPTER 3 Barriers and facilitators to wider EV adoption ............................... 11 3.1 Barriers to wider EV adoption .......................................................................... 11 3.1.1 Limited range, long recharge time and high cost ................................. 11 3.1.2 Limited recharging availability ............................................................ 13 3.1.3 Safety concerns ................................................................................... 13 3.1.4 Consumers’ negative perception and understanding of future savings ................................................................................................ 14 3.1.5 Consumers’ attitude-action gap .......................................................... 16 3.1.6 Customers’ unfamiliarity with EVs ..................................................... 16 3.1.7 Institutional barriers ........................................................................... 17 3.2 Facilitators to wider EV adoption ..................................................................... 17 3.2.1 Incentives and consumers’ price sensitivity.......................................... 17 3.2.2 Innovations in supporting infrastructure ............................................. 18 3.2.3 Symbolic values and early adopters ..................................................... 18 CHAPTER 4 Policies and programmes for wider EV adoption ............................ 21 v Bringing the electric car to the mass market RAND Europe 4.1 Our approach in selecting countries for comparison with the UK .................... 21 4.2 Incentivising EV market expansion ................................................................. 22 4.2.1 UK .................................................................................................... 22 4.2.2 France ................................................................................................ 25 4.2.3 Denmark ........................................................................................... 26 4.2.4 Canada .............................................................................................. 28 4.3 Developing infrastructure ................................................................................ 30 4.3.1 UK .................................................................................................... 30 4.3.2 France ................................................................................................ 30 4.3.3 Denmark ........................................................................................... 31 4.3.4 Canada .............................................................................................. 31 4.4 The Better Place Model ................................................................................... 32 CHAPTER 5 Examples of EV initiatives .............................................................. 35 5.1 London ........................................................................................................... 35 5.2 Milton Keynes ................................................................................................. 37 5.3 Cambridge ...................................................................................................... 37 5.4 Paris ................................................................................................................ 39 5.5 Copenhagen .................................................................................................... 39 5.6 New York City ................................................................................................ 41 5.7 Quebec and Ontario ....................................................................................... 42 CHAPTER 6 Conclusions ................................................................................... 45 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................... 49 Reference list ............................................................................................................. 50 vi Table of Tables Table 1: Comparison of BEVs, PHEVs and HEVs ............................................................ 4 Table 2: Vehicle eligibility criteria for consumer incentive in the UK ................................ 5 Table 3: Vehicles eligible for government subsidy of purchase price, cross-country comparison ....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2016 Buick Lacrosse Owner Manual
    2k16_CS6_Buick_Lacrosse_23180150C.ai 1 2/9/2016 9:49:19 AM C M Y CM MY CY CMY K 23180150 C Buick LaCrosse Owner Manual (GMNA-Localizing-U.S./Canada/Mexico- 9159288) - 2016 - CRC - 10/5/15 Contents Introduction . 2 In Brief . 5 Keys, Doors, and Windows . 26 Seats and Restraints . 49 Storage . 97 Instruments and Controls . 100 Lighting . 148 Infotainment System . 156 Climate Controls . 157 Driving and Operating . 163 Vehicle Care . 226 Service and Maintenance . 313 Technical Data . 326 Customer Information . 330 Reporting Safety Defects . 341 OnStar . 345 Index . 355 Buick LaCrosse Owner Manual (GMNA-Localizing-U.S./Canada/Mexico- 9159288) - 2016 - CRC - 2/3/16 2 Introduction Introduction This manual describes features that Helm, Incorporated may or may not be on the vehicle Attention: Customer Service because of optional equipment that 47911 Halyard Drive was not purchased on the vehicle, Plymouth, MI 48170 model variants, country USA specifications, features/applications that may not be available in your Using this Manual region, or changes subsequent to the printing of this owner manual. To quickly locate information about the vehicle, use the Index in the The names, logos, emblems, Refer to the purchase back of the manual. It is an slogans, vehicle model names, and documentation relating to your alphabetical list of what is in the vehicle body designs appearing in specific vehicle to confirm the manual and the page number where this manual including, but not limited features. it can be found. to, GM, the GM logo, BUICK, the BUICK Emblem, and LACROSSE Keep this manual in the vehicle for are trademarks and/or service quick reference.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Pre-Infrastructure Planning a Discussion of Social, Economic, and Technological Readiness of Prince Edward Island
    University of Prince Edward Island Electric Vehicle Pre-Infrastructure Planning A Discussion of Social, Economic, and Technological Readiness of Prince Edward Island Georgina Vardy 10/22/2012 A localized study, focused on Prince Edward Island, Canada, compiled to assist with determining social, economic and technological readiness for electric vehicles and the related infrastructure. The study used both a Christensen based disruptive technology framework approach and traditional marketing techniques to determine social and economic readiness. Residents showed an interest and aptitude for the social changes required however the financial affordability of the electric vehicles for residents was limited without nationally available, but locally deficient, incentives. A technology scan determined that electric vehicle battery chemical content and design are determining factors in effectively satisfying social needs and acceptance. The next stage includes localized marketing development for this unique location, vehicles sales and infrastructure. PERMISSION TO USE SIGNATURE PROJECT REPORT Title of Signature Project: Electric Vehicle Pre-Infrastructure Planning: A Discussion of Social, Economic, and Technological Readiness of Prince Edward Island Name of Author: Georgina Vardy Department: School of Business Degree: Master of Business Administration Year: 2012 Name of Supervisor(s): Tim Carroll In presenting this signature project report in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Prince Edward Island, the author has agreed that the Robertson Library, University of Prince Edward Island, may make this signature project freely available for inspection and gives permission to add an electronic version of the signature project to the Digital Repository at the University of Prince Edward Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Vehicle Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards: a Global Update 2 Passenger Vehicle Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards: a Global Update
    Cars and Climate Change Passenger Vehicle Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards: A Global Update 2 Passenger Vehicle Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards: A Global Update The goal of the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) is to dramatically reduce conventional pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from personal, public, and goods transportation in order to improve air quality and human health, and mitigate climate change. The Council is made up of leading government officials and experts from around the world that participate as individuals based on their experience with air quality and transportation issues. The ICCT promotes best practices and comprehensive solutions to improve vehicle emissions and efficiency, increase fuel quality and sustainability of alternative fuels, reduce pollution from the in-use fleet, and curtail emissions from international goods movement. www.theicct.org Published by The International Council on Clean Transportation © July 2007 The International Council on Clean Transportation Designed by Big Think Studios Printed on 100% recycled paper with soy-based ink This document does not necessarily represent the views of organizations or government agencies represented by ICCT reviewers or participants. 3 Passenger Vehicle Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards: A Global Update Authors: Feng An Innovation Center for Energy and Transportation Deborah Gordon Transportation Policy Consultant Hui He, Drew Kodjak, and Daniel Rutherford International Council on Clean Transportation Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank our many colleagues around the world that have generously contributed their time and insight in reviewing and commenting on the draft version of this report. We would like to thank the Hewlett and Energy Foundations for making this report possible through their vision, energy and resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinating Measures to Reduce Fuel Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S
    Putting Policy in Drive: Coordinating Measures to Reduce Fuel Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Light-Duty Vehicles by Christopher W. Evans B.Sc. Mechanical Engineering University Manitoba, 2004 Submitted to the Engineering Systems Division in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Technology and Policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2008 © 2008 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved Signature of Author................................................................................................................ Technology and Policy Program, Engineering Systems Division May 9, 2008 Certified by ............................................................................................................................ John B. Heywood Sun Jae Professor of Mechanical Engineering Director, Sloan Automotive Laboratory Thesis Supervisor Accepted by ........................................................................................................................... Dava J. Newman Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Director, Technology and Policy Program 2 Putting Policy in Drive: Coordinating Measures to Reduce Fuel Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Light-Duty Vehicles by Christopher W. Evans Submitted to the Engineering Systems Division on May 9, 2008 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Technology and Policy Abstract The challenges of energy security and climate
    [Show full text]
  • Easy Battery Swapping
    EasyEasy BatteryBattery SwappingSwapping Gilles MULATO Chanan GABAY Jacques POILLOT Amit YUDAN Gonzalo HENNEQUET BetterBetter PlacePlace RENAULTRENAULT G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 CONTENTS: 1. RENAULT & Better Place Battery Swapping History 2. Current Renault Fluence Z.E. Quick Drop System 3. Current Better Place Quick Drop Stations 4. The Future: The EASYBAT Project G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 2 1. Renault & Better Place Battery Bay History Battery Swapping : State of the Art By switching the battery of the electric vehicle, its range can be extended. A switchable battery pack is a battery pack that can be easily installed and removed into and out of the electric vehicle. The battery bay is a set of interfaces between an electric vehicle (EV) and a switchable battery pack. Two battery bay alternatives exist today: 1st Commercial Generation of the Fluence Z.E. (Renault). Better Place alternative Battery Bay concept G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 3 1. Renault & Better Place Battery Bay History March 2008: • Renault reveals its 1st Generation Battery Bay design for Fluence. July 2008: • Better Place presents conceptual design for battery switch station. May 2009: • Better Place demonstrates alternative Battery Bay concept in Japan. September 2009: • Renault demonstrates the Fluence including the commercial 1st Generation in Frankfurt auto show. April 2010: • Better Place demonstrates its alternative Battery Bay prototype on electric taxis in Tokyo, Japan. July 2010: • Better Place demonstrates integration of Fluence 1st Generation in the BP Alpha battery switch station G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 4 2. Current Renault Fluence Z.E. Quick Drop System WHY A BATTERY QUICK EXCHANGE SYSTEM? => QUICK DROP G.
    [Show full text]
  • PHEV09 Finalprogram FINAL0
    Table of Contents Welcome Letters .................................................................................. 1 Rally ............................................................................................2 Conference Program Monday, September 28 .............................................................. 3-5 Tuesday, September 29 .............................................................6-16 Wednesday, September 30 ....................................................... 17-24 Poster Sessions ....................................................................6,9,13 Trade Show Floor Plan ............................................................................... 25 Exhibitors List ..........................................................................26 Useful Information and Delegate Services .............................................. 28-29 Committees and Organization Organizing Committee Co-chairs Serge Roy, Hydro-Québec Al Cormier, Electric Mobility Canada Members Wendy Bailey, Environment Canada Carol Burelle, Natural Resources Canada Sylvain Castonguay, CNTA - Centre national du transport avancé Isabelle Desloges, JPdL Mark Dubois-Phillips, BC Hydro Michel Dumoulin, National Research Council Canada Arne Elias, The Centre for Sustainable Transportation © Tourisme Montréal Angelo Giumento, Hydro-Québec Louis Grenier, Canadian Space Agency Michel Guimont, Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune Ed Innes, Manitoba Hydro Ian MacIntyre, Natural Resouces Canada Tom Molinski, Manitoba Hydro Tabitha
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Infrastructure for the Monterey Bay Area the Associa on of Monterey Bay Area Governments August 2013
    E V Electric Vehicle Infrastructure for the Monterey Bay Area The Associa on of Monterey Bay Area Governments August 2013 The prepara on of this document was funded by a grant awarded by the Monterey Bay Unifi ed Air Pollu on Control District (MUAPCD), as part of the AB2766 program. Project Staff Alan Romero, Monterey Bay Unifi ed Air Pollu on Control District (MBUAPCD) AMBAG Dawn Mathes, Monterey County Resource Management Agency (RMA) Paul Hierling, Planner Carl P. Holm, Monterey County RMA Cody Meyer, Planner Craig Spencer, Monterey County RMA Anais Schenk, Planner Mario Salazar, Monterey County RMA Jason Adelaars, GIS Michael Ricker, City of Salinas Ecology Ac on Veronica Lezama, San Benito Council of Piet Canin, Vice President, Transporta on Governments Group Tegan Speiser, Santa Cruz County RTC Emily Glanville, Program Specialist Michael Zeller, TAMC Monterey Bay Unifi ed Air James Wasserman, Zero Motorcycles, Plug- Pollu on Control District In America Alan Romero, Air Quality Planner III Megan Tolbert, CSU Monterey Bay EV Communi es Alliance Piet Canin, Ecology Ac on Richard Corcoran, PEV Owner Richard Schorske, CEO Teresa Buika, UC Santa Cruz Previous staff contributors Richard Schorske, EV Communi es Alliance John Doughty Randy Deshazo, Principal Planner Linda Meckel, Planner, Project Manager MBEVA Plug-In Electric Vehicle Coordina ng Council Sharon Sarris, Green Fuse Energy Kris Markey, Offi ce of Monterey County Supervisor Parker Andy Hartmann, Interna onal Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Cheryl Schmi , City of Santa Cruz For more informa on regarding this study, contact Anais Schenk at [email protected] 2 E V Electric Vehicle Infrastructure for the Monterey Bay Area Execu ve Summary..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Liquid Biofuels for APEC Economies
    NREL/TP-6A2-43709. Posted with permission. The Future of Liquid Biofuels for APEC Economies Energy Working Group May 2008 Report prepared for the APEC Energy Working Group under EWG 01/2006A by: Anelia Milbrandt National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Golden, Colorado, USA Web site: www.nrel.gov Dr. Ralph P. Overend NREL Research Fellow (Retired) Ottawa, Ontario, Canada APEC#208-RE-01.8 Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge and thank the project overseer Mr. Rangsan Sarochawikasit (Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Thailand) for his leadership of this project. We also would like to thank Dr. Helena Chum (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, USA) for contributing materials, and providing review and feedback; and the chair of APEC Biofuels Task Force, Mr. Jeffrey Skeer, (Department of Energy, USA) for his support and guidance. The authors also greatly appreciate the time and valuable contributions of the following individuals: Ms. Naomi Ashurst and Ms. Marie Taylor, Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources, Australia Ms. Siti Hafsah, Office of the Minister of Energy, Brunei Darussalam Mr. Mark Stumborg, Agriculture and Agri-Food, Canada Ms. Corissa Petro, National Energy Commission, Chile Mr. Song Yanqin and Mr. Zhao Yongqiang, National Development and Reform Commission, China Mr. K.C. Lo, Electrical and Mechanical Service Department, Hong Kong, China Dr. Hom-Ti Lee, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Chinese Taipei Mr. Hendi Kariawan, Indonesia Biofuels Team, Indonesia Dr. Jeong-Hwan Bae, Korea Energy Economics Institute, Republic of Korea Mr. Diego Arjona-Arguelles, Secretariat for Energy (SENER), Mexico Mr. Angel Irazola and Mr. Diego de la Puente Consigliere, Agricola Del Chira S.A., Peru Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Paper
    Charging the Future: Challenges and Opportunities for Electric Vehicle Adoption Faculty Research Working Paper Series Henry Lee Harvard Kennedy School Alex Clark Climate Policy Initiative September 2018 RWP18-026 Visit the HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series at: https://www.hks.harvard.edu/research-insights/publications?f%5B0%5D=publication_types%3A121 The views expressed in the HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the John F. Kennedy School of Government or of Harvard University. Faculty Research Working Papers have not undergone formal review and approval. Such papers are included in this series to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. Copyright belongs to the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. www.hks.harvard.edu ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Charging the Future Challenges and Opportunities for Electric Vehicle Adoption Henry Lee Alex Clark PAPER AUGUST 2018 Environment and Natural Resources Program Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 www.belfercenter.org/ENRP The authors of this report invites use of this information for educational purposes, requiring only that the reproduced material clearly cite the full source: Lee, Henry, and Alex Clark, “Charging the Future: Challenges and Opportunities for Electric Vehicle Adoption.” Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University, August 2018. Statements and views expressed in this report are solely those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, the Harvard Kennedy School, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Place Australia 114 Balmain St Richmond VIC 3121 Tel: (03) 8679 0800 Email: [email protected] Website
    Submission to the Review of Energy Market Arrangements for Electric Vehicles 27 October 2011 Australian Energy Market Commission PO Box A2449 Sydney South NSW 1235 Contact person for submission Tim Watts Better Place Australia 114 Balmain St Richmond VIC 3121 Tel: (03) 8679 0800 Email: [email protected] Website: www.betterplace.com.au Page 1 of 25 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 3 A. What role does Better Place play in the National Electricity Market (NEM)? What type of market participant are we? ................................................................................................................................. 4 B. AEMC Question 1 - What are the key drivers and likely uptake of EVs in the NEM? ......................... 5 C. AEMC Question 2 - What are the costs and benefits that EVs may introduce into Australia's electricity markets? ................................................................................................................................. 9 D. AEMC Question 3 - What are the appropriate electricity market regulatory arrangements necessary to facilitate the efficient uptake of EVs? .............................................................................. 12 E. AEMC Question 4 - What are the required changes to the current electricity market regulatory arrangements and suggestions for reform to facilitate the efficient uptake of EVs? .......................... 18 Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • Electric and Hybrid Cars SECOND EDITION This Page Intentionally Left Blank Electric and Hybrid Cars a History
    Electric and Hybrid Cars SECOND EDITION This page intentionally left blank Electric and Hybrid Cars A History Second Edition CURTIS D. ANDERSON and JUDY ANDERSON McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Jefferson, North Carolina, and London LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Anderson, Curtis D. (Curtis Darrel), 1947– Electric and hybrid cars : a history / Curtis D. Anderson and Judy Anderson.—2nd ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7864-3301-8 softcover : 50# alkaline paper 1. Electric automobiles. 2. Hybrid electric cars. I. Anderson, Judy, 1946– II. Title. TL220.A53 2010 629.22'93—dc22 2010004216 British Library cataloguing data are available ©2010 Curtis D. Anderson. All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. On the cover: (clockwise from top left) Cutaway of hybrid vehicle (©20¡0 Scott Maxwell/LuMaxArt); ¡892 William Morrison Electric Wagon; 20¡0 Honda Insight; diagram of controller circuits of a recharging motor, ¡900 Manufactured in the United States of America McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Box 611, Je›erson, North Carolina 28640 www.mcfarlandpub.com To my family, in gratitude for making car trips such a happy time. (J.A.A.) This page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms and Initialisms ix Preface 1 Introduction: The Birth of the Automobile Industry 3 1. The Evolution of the Electric Vehicle 21 2. Politics 60 3. Environment 106 4. Technology 138 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Electric Vehicle Business Models
    Working Document of the NPC Future Transportation Fuels Study Made Available August 1, 2012 Topic Paper #18 Emerging Electric Vehicle Business Models On August 1, 2012, The National Petroleum Council (NPC) in approving its report, Advancing Technology for America’s Transportation Future, also approved the making available of certain materials used in the study process, including detailed, specific subject matter papers prepared or used by the study’s Task Groups and/or Subgroups. These Topic Papers were working documents that were part of the analyses that led to development of the summary results presented in the report’s Executive Summary and Chapters. These Topic Papers represent the views and conclusions of the authors. The National Petroleum Council has not endorsed or approved the statements and conclusions contained in these documents, but approved the publication of these materials as part of the study process. The NPC believes that these papers will be of interest to the readers of the report and will help them better understand the results. These materials are being made available in the interest of transparency. Emerging Electric Vehicle Business Models (White Paper for the NPC Study) Introduction: Historically, the transition to electric cars has been slowed by numerous obstacles, including range limitations, battery affordability, battery obsolescence and durability risks, and strains on the electric grid. The complexity and novelty of the electrification value chain - which merges the utility value chain with the automotive, battery and charging infrastructure value chains - suggest a number of challenges as to how cost-effective business models will be defined and how electrification of the transport industry will be successfully delivered.
    [Show full text]