Easy Battery Swapping

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Easy Battery Swapping EasyEasy BatteryBattery SwappingSwapping Gilles MULATO Chanan GABAY Jacques POILLOT Amit YUDAN Gonzalo HENNEQUET BetterBetter PlacePlace RENAULTRENAULT G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 CONTENTS: 1. RENAULT & Better Place Battery Swapping History 2. Current Renault Fluence Z.E. Quick Drop System 3. Current Better Place Quick Drop Stations 4. The Future: The EASYBAT Project G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 2 1. Renault & Better Place Battery Bay History Battery Swapping : State of the Art By switching the battery of the electric vehicle, its range can be extended. A switchable battery pack is a battery pack that can be easily installed and removed into and out of the electric vehicle. The battery bay is a set of interfaces between an electric vehicle (EV) and a switchable battery pack. Two battery bay alternatives exist today: 1st Commercial Generation of the Fluence Z.E. (Renault). Better Place alternative Battery Bay concept G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 3 1. Renault & Better Place Battery Bay History March 2008: • Renault reveals its 1st Generation Battery Bay design for Fluence. July 2008: • Better Place presents conceptual design for battery switch station. May 2009: • Better Place demonstrates alternative Battery Bay concept in Japan. September 2009: • Renault demonstrates the Fluence including the commercial 1st Generation in Frankfurt auto show. April 2010: • Better Place demonstrates its alternative Battery Bay prototype on electric taxis in Tokyo, Japan. July 2010: • Better Place demonstrates integration of Fluence 1st Generation in the BP Alpha battery switch station G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 4 2. Current Renault Fluence Z.E. Quick Drop System WHY A BATTERY QUICK EXCHANGE SYSTEM? => QUICK DROP G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 5 2. Current Renault Fluence Z.E. Quick Drop System WHY A BATTERY QUICK EXCHANGE SYSTEM? => QUICK DROP The « conventional » by wire EV charging systems could appear long in some customer usage situations (6 to 8 hours for standard charging and 20 to 30 minutes for fast charging) The QUICK-DROP system allows switching a discharged battery by a fully charged one in less than 5 minutes. The customer will start up again with 100% Autonomy Capability. To reduce Range Anxiety => Similar to a Conventional Gas Station. …. Clean, Simple, Fast and Without Constraints. G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 6 2. Current Renault Fluence Z.E. Quick Drop System THE QUICK DROP STATION STATION quickStart yourdrop Sequenceengine &In evacuate order Meter Superviser EV Button start sequence 1 - Under floor Washing 5 – Storage of Charged Batteries DIAM – Sce 65155 21-4-09 2 - Empty BatterySTRICTEMENT Removal CONFIDENTIEL 6 – Transfer of Charged Battery 3 - Empty Battery Transfer 7 – Charged Battery fitting 4 - Batteries Charging Area 4 – Vehicle departure G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 7 3 - Current Better Place Quick Drop Stations Better Place Battery Bay V1 Yokohama Combat aircraft Switch payload carrier Demonstration concept May 2009 Tokyo electric taxi fleet, May 2010 G. HennequetCONFIDENTIAL © 2011 Better Place JapanJune 30, 2011 8 8 3 - Current Better Place Quick Drop Stations Battery Switch Station Types- Version 0.x Israel, Petach-Tiqva BSS V0.1 Tokyo Toranomon BSS V0.2 Concept BSS, serves L38 and Serves Battery Bay cars only Battery Bay cars G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 9 4 - EASYBAT Project EASYBAT - " Models and generic interfaces for easy and safe Battery insert ion and removal in electric vehicles “ GC-SST.2010.7-4. GC-SST.2010.7-4. TPT // GA N°26568 4 EASYBAT’s main mission is to address battery integration challenges by defining new concepts for the smart insertion of batteries and by developing in particular generic interfaces for electric vehicles. This research project aims at enabling smooth batteries integration and swap. The EASYBAT integration system will be developed for fully electric vehicles. EASYBAT will develop : • Generic interfaces to improve interoperability between the battery system modules and the vehicle on board-systems • New components for an easy & safe location and quick integration of the battery in the vehicle. • At each stage of the project, the EASYBAT partners will assess the feasibility of the overall battery swapping concept considering costs, logistics, and environmental aspects. G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 10 4 - EASYBAT Project EASYBAT CONSORTIUM Name Short name Country C BETTER PLACE LABS ISRAEL LTD BP Israel RENAULT s.a.s RENAULT France RHEINISCH-WESTFAELISCHE TECHNISCHE IKA Germany HOCHSCHULE AACHEN KEMA NEDERLAND BV KEMA Netherlands FRAUNHOFER-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FOERDERUNG Fraunhofer IPA Germany DER ANGEWANDTEN FORSCHUNG E.V TEKNOLOGISK INSTITUT DTI Denmark TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITAET MUENCHEN TUM Germany TÜV RHEINLAND KRAFTFAHRT GMBH TUV Germany UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA HU Israel Continental Engineering Services GmbH CES&P Germany ERNST & YOUNG (ISRAEL) LTD EY Israel G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 11 4 - EASYBAT Project EASYBAT Solution Standard Interface • Mechanical Interfaces • High Voltage Power Interfaces • Thermal Interfaces • Low Voltage and data interfaces Battery Bay Battery G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 12 4 - EASYBAT Project G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 13 4 - EASYBAT Project EASYBAT WP7, Lead by RENAULT WP8 WP1 Dissemination Standardization & System Requirements & Exploitation of Results Use Cases Defintion D7.1/D7.2/D7.3 -Requirements deliverables -Usage cases WP6 Battery Operation WP3 Cycle Management & WP7 Developed Developed System Communication with Integration Validation & solutions solutions Architecture & the Vehicle and Field testing Design Battery Swap Mechanism Developped Developped solutions solutions WP5 WP4 Battery Packaging Vehicle Generic Battery Interfaces Integration Models & Safety Aspects Definition & Development G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 14 4 - EASYBAT Project Interaction between WP7 and the other EASYBAT ’s partners BP TUV CES Proto component construction, testing, validation planning & analysis contribution Subsystems (BCM, interfaces) EV integration Safety aspects analysis support, final modifications contribution WP7 Feed-back on the Cycle tests for analyses from EV connectors in climate bench concepts experience IPA TUM Analysis of the battery Evaluation of the battery degradation operation, battery impact after components and vehicle safety, BMS, BCM tests and integration into the model KEMA DTI G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 15 ThankThank youyou forfor youryour attention!attention! G. Hennequet June 30, 2011 16.
Recommended publications
  • Better Place Australia 114 Balmain St Richmond VIC 3121 Tel: (03) 8679 0800 Email: [email protected] Website
    Submission to the Review of Energy Market Arrangements for Electric Vehicles 27 October 2011 Australian Energy Market Commission PO Box A2449 Sydney South NSW 1235 Contact person for submission Tim Watts Better Place Australia 114 Balmain St Richmond VIC 3121 Tel: (03) 8679 0800 Email: [email protected] Website: www.betterplace.com.au Page 1 of 25 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 3 A. What role does Better Place play in the National Electricity Market (NEM)? What type of market participant are we? ................................................................................................................................. 4 B. AEMC Question 1 - What are the key drivers and likely uptake of EVs in the NEM? ......................... 5 C. AEMC Question 2 - What are the costs and benefits that EVs may introduce into Australia's electricity markets? ................................................................................................................................. 9 D. AEMC Question 3 - What are the appropriate electricity market regulatory arrangements necessary to facilitate the efficient uptake of EVs? .............................................................................. 12 E. AEMC Question 4 - What are the required changes to the current electricity market regulatory arrangements and suggestions for reform to facilitate the efficient uptake of EVs? .......................... 18 Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Electric Vehicle Business Models
    Working Document of the NPC Future Transportation Fuels Study Made Available August 1, 2012 Topic Paper #18 Emerging Electric Vehicle Business Models On August 1, 2012, The National Petroleum Council (NPC) in approving its report, Advancing Technology for America’s Transportation Future, also approved the making available of certain materials used in the study process, including detailed, specific subject matter papers prepared or used by the study’s Task Groups and/or Subgroups. These Topic Papers were working documents that were part of the analyses that led to development of the summary results presented in the report’s Executive Summary and Chapters. These Topic Papers represent the views and conclusions of the authors. The National Petroleum Council has not endorsed or approved the statements and conclusions contained in these documents, but approved the publication of these materials as part of the study process. The NPC believes that these papers will be of interest to the readers of the report and will help them better understand the results. These materials are being made available in the interest of transparency. Emerging Electric Vehicle Business Models (White Paper for the NPC Study) Introduction: Historically, the transition to electric cars has been slowed by numerous obstacles, including range limitations, battery affordability, battery obsolescence and durability risks, and strains on the electric grid. The complexity and novelty of the electrification value chain - which merges the utility value chain with the automotive, battery and charging infrastructure value chains - suggest a number of challenges as to how cost-effective business models will be defined and how electrification of the transport industry will be successfully delivered.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Place: a Green Ecosystem for the Mass Adoption of Electric Cars
    Global Case Writing Competition 2010 Corporate Sustainability Track 3rd Place Business Model Innovation by Better Place: A Green Ecosystem for the Mass Adoption of Electric Cars Prof. Ramalingam Meenakshisundaram and Besta Shankar ICMR Center for Management Research, Hyderabad, India This is an Online Inspection Copy. Protected under Copyright Law. Reproduction Forbidden unless Authorized. Licensed copies of the case are available at www.icmrindia.org. Copyright © 2010 by the Author. All rights reserved. This case was prepared by Prof. Ramalingam Meenakshisundaram as a basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate the effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form by any means without permission oikos sustainability case collection http://www.oikos-international.org/projects/cwc oikos Global Case Writing Competition 2010 3rd Place “After a century of being joined at the hip, the car industry and the oil industry are headed for a divorce. Cars are about to leave behind the dirty fuel—in this case, gasoline—that has powered them. It’s going to have dramatic consequences throughout the energy and car industries.” 1 Vijay Vaitheeswaran, Correspondent at The Economist and co-author of ‘Zoom: The Global Race to Fuel the Car of the Future’ “It’s a subscription system much like cellular providers have. You sign up for a certain number of miles a month.” 2 Shai Agassi, Founder and CEO of Better Place “It makes so much sense from the environmental point of view as well as the business point of view.” 3 Idan Ofer, Chairman of Israel Corp 4 and Board Chairman of Better Place “When I first heard about it, I thought it was just another crazy idea.
    [Show full text]
  • Stretching, Embeddedness, and Scripts in a Sociotechnical Transition: MARK Explaining the Failure of Electric Mobility at Better Place (2007–2013)
    Technological Forecasting & Social Change 123 (2017) 24–34 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Technological Forecasting & Social Change journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/techfore Stretching, embeddedness, and scripts in a sociotechnical transition: MARK Explaining the failure of electric mobility at Better Place (2007–2013) ⁎ Benjamin K. Sovacoola,b, , Lance Noela, Renato J. Orsatoc a Center for Energy Technologies, Department of Business Development and Technology, Aarhus University, Birk Centerpark 15, DK-7400 Herning, Denmark b Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), School of Business, Management, and Economics, University of Sussex, United Kingdom c São Paulo School of Management (EAESP), Getúlio Vargas Foundation (FGV), Sao Paulo, Brazil ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Based on field research, interviews, and participant observation, this study explores the failure of Better Place—a Electric vehicles now bankrupt company—to successfully demonstrate and deploy battery swapping stations and electric vehicle Energy transitions charging infrastructure. To do so, it draws from concepts in innovation studies, sociotechnical transitions, Fit-stretch management science, organizational studies, and sociology. The study expands upon the notion of “fit-stretch”, Sociotechnical systems which explains how innovations can move from an initial “fit” (with existing user practices, discourses, technical form) to a subsequent “stretch” (as the technology further develops, new functionalities are opened up, etc.) in the process of long-term transitions. It also draws from the “dialectical issue life cycle model” or “triple em- beddedness framework” to explain the process whereby incumbent industry actors can introduce defensive in- novations to “contain” a new niche from expanding. It lastly incorporates elements from design-driven in- novation and organizational learning related to schemas and scripts, concepts that illustrate the vision- dependent and discursive elements of the innovation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation 07
    Vision to reality March 2011 Accelerating Mass Adoption: Pricing Models CONFIDENTIAL © 2011 Better Place Amit Yudan / Europe Business Development / e-mobility NSR /October 2011 “How do you make the world a better place by 2020?” End dependence on oil... Accelerate the transformation to a sustainable electric automotive solution CONFIDENTIAL © 2011 Better Place 2 Membership benefits charge spots • Personal charge spots installed for members • Unlimited access to charge spots installed in public • Standards compliant • Networked and intelligent • User-friendly design CONFIDENTIAL © 2011 Better Place 3 Membership benefits batteries & battery switch • Unlimited access to batteries (no fee per switch) • Instant range extension for long-distance trips • Optimal thermal management to prolong battery life CONFIDENTIAL © 2011 Better Place 4 Membership benefits driver support system • Energy management (accessible via in-car unit, web, mobile) • Intelligent, always-online navigation & route planning • State-of-the-art multimedia display CONFIDENTIAL © 2011 Better Place 5 Intelligent Network Management Smart Chraging Interfaces to utilities / energy providers Optimisation between user needs and network capacity Demandside management, renewable energy and distributed storage CONFIDENTIAL © 2011 Better Place 6 Battery Switch Station Network as Distributed Storage Renewable Energy raise new challenges for the electric grid BSS network can serve for two purposes: • Extend range of Vehicles • Distributed Storage at marginal costs *Illustration only of a BSS network 7 CONFIDENTIAL © 2011 Better Place 7 How does it work for the driver? How does it work for the driver? • Buy car (battery not included). • Choose one of various fixed- price membership packages based on miles: • Battery with guaranteed service level, unlimited network access (charging and switch), in-car driver support system, 24x7 customer service, roadside assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Booklet
    Conference booklet 1 KOLOFON Editor Jan Peloza Designer Aleš Salokar in Gregor Brdnik Issued by International Youth Health Organization, Gregorčičeva ulica 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia Printed by Infokart d.o.o., Mencingerjeva ulica 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia Printed on recycled paper, 150 copies Ljubljana, December 2019 2 FOREWORD by the YHO President, Andrej Martin Vujkovac Those of you who know me personally, know that I have been going through major life changes in the recent months, one of the biggest being changing the country where I work and live. And with it finding a new place to call home. I have been forced to reflect on the meaning of the word- home. In the be- ginning, there was only the apartment. Little by little, by filling it with experiences, memories (and things that allow me to live), I am starting to understand that it is a place where one calls their own. More than just a shelter, it is a place to find peace, to rest and recharge. It is the place where you are supported and sometimes challenged by people closest to you- who make you grow. It is the place, despite its imperfections, which allows you to be yourself. Strangely enough, I see the First European NCD Youth Conference in a similar way. For now, it is only an empty apartment. Throughout the next few days, with every shared idea, inspiring story and meaningful connection, we will be laying the foundation for a home. However, our story will not end at the final speech on the last plenary.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertically Integrated Supply Chain of Batteries, Electric Vehicles
    sustainability Review Vertically Integrated Supply Chain of Batteries, Electric Vehicles, and Charging Infrastructure: A Review of Three Milestone Projects from Theory of Constraints Perspective Michael Naor 1,* , Alex Coman 2 and Anat Wiznizer 1 1 School of Busines Administration, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel; [email protected] 2 School of Computer Science, Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Tel Aviv 61000, Israel; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This research utilizes case study methodology based on longitudinal interviews over a decade coupled with secondary data sources to juxtapose Tesla with two high-profile past mega- projects in the electric transportation industry, EV-1 and Better Place. The theory of constraints serves as a lens to identify production and market bottlenecks for the dissemination of electric vehicles. The valuable lessons learned from EV1 failure and Better Place bankruptcy paved the way for Tesla’s operations strategy to build gigafactories which bears a resemblance to Ford T mass production last century. Specifically, EV1 relied on external suppliers to develop batteries, while Better Place was dependent on a single manufacturer to build cars uniquely compatible with its charging infrastructure, whereas Tesla established a closed-loop, green, vertically integrated supply chain consisting of batteries, electric cars and charging infrastructure to meet its customers evolving needs. The analysis unveils several limitations of the Tesla business model which can impede its Citation: Naor, M.; Coman, A.; Wiznizer, A. Vertically Integrated worldwide expansion, such as utility grid overload and a shortage of raw material, which Tesla Supply Chain of Batteries, Electric strives to address by innovating advanced batteries and further extending its vertically integrated Vehicles, and Charging Infrastructure: supply chain to the mining industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleaning The
    GREEN TECH : ENVIRONMENT • ENERGY • ECONOMY CLEANING THE AIR Audi A3 TDI clubsport quattro (euro) ANNUAL AIR QUALITY CONFERENCE OF ELECTED OFFICIALS On October 20, the Maricopa County Air Quality Department brought together a group of Arizona’s elected officials at the Partnering for Cleaner Air Annual Air Quality Conference, to discuss their perspective on the future of air quality regulations for the state. The panel—titled The Elected Official’s Perspective: What Information is Needed for Informed Decision-Making for Future Air Quality Regulations?—highlighted perspectives from all levels of state government. The panel discussed what needs to be done to meet Volkswagen Golf TDI (euro) federal clean air standards and create future regulations for Arizona. Moderated by Nancy Welch, associate director for the Morrison Institute for Public Policy, panelists included Arizona Rep. Ray Barnes, Arizona Sen. John Huppenthal, Supervisor Don Stapley of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors District 2, and Tempe Mayor Hugh Hallman. The politicians get involved for reasons of health and well-being, but also to serve their constituencies financially: environmental impact from air pollution not only affects public health, but if not brought into compliance, the air quality crisis in 2010 Honda Insight Maricopa County is a threat to crucial transportation dollars coming into the state. As a member of the Senate Retirement and Rural Development Committee, Sen. Huppenthal said, “The growth of Arizona is dependent upon meeting the needs of our citizens. Meeting air quality standards will solidify the future of Arizona, keeping us from losing much needed highway and freeway funding.” The Maricopa County Air Quality Department is a regulatory agency whose goal is to ensure federal clean air standards are achieved and main- tained for the residents and visitors of Maricopa County.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shift to Electric Vehicles
    IBM Global Business Services Automotive Executive Report IBM Institute for Business Value The shift to electric vehicles Putting consumers in the driver’s seat IBM Institute for Business Value IBM Global Business Services, through the IBM Institute for Business Value, develops fact-based strategic insights for senior executives around critical public and private sector issues. This executive report is based on an in-depth study by the Institute’s research team. It is part of an ongoing commitment by IBM Global Business Services to provide analysis and viewpoints that help companies realize business value. You may contact the authors or send an e-mail to [email protected] for more information. Additional studies from the IBM Institute for Business Value can be found at ibm.com/iibv Introduction By Kalman Gyimesi and Ravi Viswanathan The world seems poised for an electric vehicle (EV) rebirth as issues ranging from environmental concerns to fluctuating oil prices continue to push consumers toward alternatives to combustion engines. Today’s EV, however, is beyond anything nineteenth century drivers could imagine. From intelligent driving to proactive service and remote vehicle access, EVs can offer the safety and convenience today’s consumers crave. To push drivers toward “plugging in,” however, automakers must better educate them, as well as offer a uniquely “connected” driving experience. Equally important, they must embrace innovative business models and partnerships. At the beginning of the twentieth century, more automobiles in However, hurdles to the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) the United States were powered by electricity than by remain, with concerns primarily centered on price and vehicle gasoline.1 By 1900, the electric vehicle was a common fixture range.
    [Show full text]
  • An Action Plan to Integrate Plug-In Electric Vehicles with the U.S. Electrical Grid Prepared by C2ES
    CE N tec HNOLOGY TE R F OR CL I MATE A ND E N E RG Y S O LUT ION S AN A ANT AC ION PLAN TO INTEGRATE ct ION P PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHIcles la N WITH THE U.S. ELECTRIcal GRID T O I N te GR ate P lu G-IN E lect RI C V E HI cles W I T A report of the PEV Dialogue Group convened H by the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions T H E U.S. E March 2012 lect RI cal G RID AN ACTION PLAN TO InTEGRATE PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLES WITH THE U.S. ELECTRICAL GRID Prepared by C2ES March 2012 Project Director Judi Greenwald Center for Climate and Energy Solutions Project Manager Nick Nigro Center for Climate and Energy Solutions Copyright, Center for Climate and Energy Solutions and Center for Environmental Excellence by AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). All Rights Reserved. This material is based upon work supported by the Federal Highway Administration under Cooperative Agreement No. DTFH61-07-H-00019. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the Author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Federal Highway Administration. ii C enter for Climate and Energy Solutions THE PEV DIALOGUE GROUP The PEV Dialogue Group convened by the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions developed this plan collabora- tively. Each group member participated by providing valuable input that was instrumental in shaping the Action Plan. The Plan’s recommendations reflect the input from the group as a whole, not necessarily those of individual organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Batteries for Electric Vehicles
    Better batteries for electric vehicles Corinna Wu Improved battery technology, innovative recharging strategies, and generous financial incentives are making electric vehicles more attractive to consumers than ever before. n 1996, General Motors unveiled the EV1, an all-electric Today’s hybrids, such as the Toyota Prius, use nickel-metal Energy Sector Analysis car powered by a heavy lead-acid battery. The EV1 was hydride batteries, but the cars now emerging feature lithium- I • enthusiastically received, but a host of economic, regulatory, ion ones. The transition to lithium-ion has been driven by the and technical concerns prompted GM to discontinue the car’s differences in power needs between hybrids and plug-in hy- leasing program in 2002. Instead of ushering in an era of electric brids. Hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) are propelled by both cars, the EV1 was widely seen as a disappointment. an internal combustion engine and a battery that is used as a But now, thanks, in part, to major improvements in battery power assist; it kicks in when the engine is least efficient, such technology, electric vehicles are having their day in the sun. as during idling or acceleration and deceleration. Because the Later this year, GM will begin selling the Chevrolet Volt, a battery gets recharged by regenerative braking, the driver only plug-in hybrid, and Nissan will begin selling the Leaf, an all- needs to refill the gas tank, just as with a traditional car. electric passenger car with a 100-mile range. In May, Tesla In a plug-in hybrid (PHEV), such as the Chevrolet Volt, the Motors purchased a former Toyota plant in Fremont, Calif., to battery powers the drive train, while the internal combustion begin manufacturing its all-electric Model S sedans.
    [Show full text]
  • Removing Barriers to Electric Vehicle Adoption by Increasing Access to Charging Infrastructure Seattle Office of Sustainability & Environment
    Removing Barriers to Electric Vehicle Adoption by Increasing Access to Charging Infrastructure Seattle Office of Sustainability & Environment Removing Barriers to Electric Vehicle Adoption by Increasing Access to Charging Infrastructure October 2014 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | 1 Removing Barriers to Electric Vehicle Adoption by Increasing Access to Charging Infrastructure Seattle Office of Sustainability & Environment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 5 Study Purpose And Methodology .......................................................................................................... 5 Stakeholder Outreach .............................................................................................................................. 6 Neighborhood Typologies ....................................................................................................................... 6 Strategy Development .............................................................................................................................. 6 Recommended Strategies ........................................................................................................................ 7 Study Findings and Recommendations ................................................................................................... 8 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]