DOCSLIB.ORG

Health United States Report 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Copyright information Permission has been obtained from the copyright holders to reproduce certain quoted material in this report. Further reproduction of this material is prohibited without specific permission of the copyright holder. All other material contained in this report is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without special permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated. Suggested citation National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2016: With Chartbook on Long-term Trends in Health. Hyattsville, MD. 2017. Library of Congress Catalog Number 76–641496 For sale by Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Thomas E. Price, M.D. Secretary Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Anne Schuchat, M.D. (RADM, U.S. Public Health Service) Acting Director National Center for Health Statistics Charles J. Rothwell, M.S., M.B.A. Director Preface Health, United States, 2016 is the 40th report on the health leading causes of death, birth rates, cigarette smoking, status of the nation and is submitted by the Secretary of the obesity, untreated dental caries, diabetes prevalence, and Department of Health and Human Services to the President uncontrolled hypertension. The third section (Figures 15–19) and the Congress of the United States in compliance with presents trends in health care utilization: use of prescription Section 308 of the Public Health Service Act. This report drugs, health care and emergency department visits, was compiled by the Centers for Disease Control and overnight hospital stays, and cancer screening tests. The Prevention's (CDC) National Center for Health Statistics fourth section (Figures 20–22) focuses on changes in health (NCHS). care resources: hospitals, primary and specialist physicians, and nursing homes. The fifth section (Figures 23–27) The Health, United States series presents an annual overview describes trends in health care expenditures: personal of national trends in health statistics. The report contains a health care expenditures, mental health and substance use Chartbook that assesses the nation's health by presenting expenditures, Medicare managed care enrollment by state, trends and current information on selected measures of and health insurance coverage. morbidity, mortality, health care utilization and access, health risk factors, prevention, health insurance, and Trend Tables personal health care expenditures. This year's Chartbook focuses on long-term trends in health. The report also The Chartbook is followed by 114 detailed Trend contains 114 Trend Tables organized around four major Tables that highlight major trends in health statistics. subject areas: health status and determinants, health Comparability across editions of Health, United States is care utilization, health care resources, and health care fostered by including similar Trend Tables in each volume, expenditures. A companion report—Health, United States: In and timeliness is maintained by improving the content of Brief—features information extracted from the full report. tables to reflect key topics in public health. An important The complete report and related data products are available criterion used in selecting these tables is the availability of on the Health, United States website at: comparable national data over a period of several years. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus.htm. Appendixes The 2016 Edition Appendix I. Data Sources describes each data source used Health, United States, 2016 contains a summary At a Glance in Health, United States, 2016 and provides references table that displays recent data on selected indicators of for further information about the sources. Data sources health and their determinants, cross-referenced to tables in are listed alphabetically within two broad categories: the report. This is followed by a Highlights section, which Government Sources, and Private and Global Sources. focuses on both long-term trends and current data on topics of public health interest and illustrates the breadth Appendix II. Definitions and Methods is an alphabetical of material included in Health, United States. The other listing of selected terms used in Health, United States, 2016. major sections are a Chartbook, detailed Trend Tables, two It also contains information on the statistical methodologies Appendixes, and an Index. The major sections of the 2016 used in the report. report are described below. Index Chartbook The Index to the Trend Tables and Chartbook figures is a The 2016 Chartbook contains 27 figures on long-term useful tool for locating data by topic. Tables and figures are trends in health. As Health, United States enters its 40th cross-referenced by such topics as child and adolescent year of reporting on the health of the nation, this year’s health; older population aged 65 and over; women's health; Chartbook focuses on trends in health and health care men's health; state data; American Indian or Alaska Native, since 1975. Examining long-term trends in health informs Asian, black or African American, Hispanic-origin, and white the development and implementation of effective health populations; education; injury; disability; and metropolitan policies and programs. The Chartbook has been grouped and nonmetropolitan data. Many of the Index topics are also into five sections. The first section (Figures 1–5) presents an available as conveniently grouped data packages on the overview of the demographic and socioeconomic factors Health, United States website at: that have influenced the health of the nation over the last 40 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus.htm. years. The second section (Figures 6–14) focuses on health status and determinants: life expectancy, infant mortality, iii Preface Health, United States, 2016 Data Considerations information on disability statistics, see Altman and Bernstein (1) and Brault (2). Racial and Ethnic Data Statistical Significance Many tables in Health, United States present data according to race and Hispanic origin, consistent with a department- All statements in the text describing differences, or lack wide emphasis on ensuring that health data on racial thereof, in estimates indicate that statistical testing was and ethnic minority populations are presented whenever performed. Differences between two point estimates possible. Trend data on race and ethnicity are presented in were determined to be statistically significant at the 0.05 the greatest detail possible after taking into account the level using two-sided significance tests (z-tests) without quality of the data, the amount of missing data, and the correction for multiple comparisons. Data tables include number of observations. These issues significantly affect the point estimates and standard errors for users who would availability of reportable data for certain populations, such like to perform additional statistical tests. In the text, the as the Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander populations standard terminology used when a difference between two and the American Indian or Alaska Native populations. point estimates was tested is, "Between (estimate 1) and Standards for the classification of federal data on race and (estimate 2)." For example, the statement "Between 2014 ethnicity are described in an appendix. (See Appendix II, and 2015" indicates that the difference between the point Race.) estimate for 2014 and that for 2015 was tested for statistical significance. Education and Income Data The statistical significance of a time trend was assessed using weighted least squares regression applied to data Many Trend Tables in Health, United States present data for all years in the time period. (For a description of the according to socioeconomic status, using education trend testing technique, see the Technical Notes that and family income as proxy measures. Education and follow the Chartbook.) The terminology used in the text to income data are generally obtained directly from survey indicate testing of a trend is "During (time period 1)–(time respondents and are not usually available from records- period 2)." For example, the statement "During 2005–2015" based data collection systems. (See Appendix II, Education; indicates that a statistical test of trend was conducted Family income; Poverty.) that included estimates for all 11 years in the time period. Because statistically significant differences or trends are Disability Data partly a function of sample size (i.e., the larger the sample, Disability can include the presence of physical or mental the smaller the change that can be detected), statistically impairments that limit a person's ability to perform an significant differences or trends do not necessarily have important activity and affect the use of or need for support, public health significance (3). accommodation, or intervention to improve functioning. Terms such as "similar," "stable," and "no difference" indicate Information on disability in the U.S. population is critical that the statistics being compared were not significantly to health planning and policy. Disability may be measured different. Lack of comment regarding the difference based on a specific disability or a composite measure between statistics does not necessarily suggest that the designed to identify persons with any of a variety of difference was tested and found to not be significant. disabilities. Health, United States includes data from the National Health Interview Survey to examine
Recommended publications
  • ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the World of Work. Sixth Edition Updated Estimates and Analysis

    ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the World of Work. Sixth Edition Updated Estimates and Analysis

    � ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the world of work. Sixth edition Updated estimates and analysis 23 September 2020 Key messages Latest labour market developments � The latest data confirm that working-hour losses are reflected in higher levels of unemployment and Workplace closures inactivity, with inactivity increasing to a greater � At 94 per cent, the overall share of workers residing extent than unemployment. Rising inactivity in countries with workplace closures of some sort is a notable feature of the current job crisis remains high. The share of workers in countries calling for strong policy attention. The decline in with required closures for all but essential employment numbers has generally been greater workplaces across the entire economy or in for women than for men. targeted areas is still significant, though there are large regional variations. Among upper- Labour income losses middle-income countries, around 70 per cent of � workers continue to live in countries with such These high working-hour losses have translated strict lockdown measures in place (whether into substantial losses in labour income. nationwide or in specific geographical areas), while Estimates of labour income losses (before taking in low-income countries, the earlier strict measures into account income support measures) suggest have been relaxed considerably, despite increasing a global decline of 10.7 per cent during the first numbers of COVID-19 cases. three quarters of 2020 (compared with the corresponding period in 2019), which amounts Working-hour losses: Again higher to US$3.5 trillion, or 5.5 per cent of global gross domestic product (GDP) for the first three quarters than previously estimated of 2019.
  • HHS Presidential Transition Agency Landing Team Book

    HHS Presidential Transition Agency Landing Team Book

    sERvick.s. 41- .41 c'o 4ifaa U.S. Department of Health & Human Services HHS Presidential Transition Agency Landing Team Book HHS Presidential Transition Team HHS - 200 Independence Avenue SW - Washington, DC 20201 WELCOME Message from the 2016 HHS Presidential Transition Team: Welcome to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). We are pleased to provide you with the 2016 HHS Presidential Transition briefing book for the Landing Team. This document is being distributed in both hard and soft copy to each member of the President-elect's Transition Team assigned to HHS. To maintain its purpose as a briefing document, the volume is not and was not intended to be all inclusive. In developing these materials, we reviewed prior Presidential Transition documents, interviewed individuals who led or participated in past Transitions, partnered with the Partnership for Public Service, and exchanged ideas through the Agency Transition Director's Council. Based on the lessons learned from past HHS Transitions and best practices gleaned from our government-wide teaming, we designed this package as follows: • The documents were prepared by senior career officials within HHS prior to the outcome of the election being known. • The book provides a comprehensive overview of NHS, but is not intended to provide every fact and figure. Instead, we have crafted a concise summary of major Departmental functions, activities, and processes to provide an overview which will assist you in gathering additional material about programs and processes of particular interest. • The briefing book includes key issues related to issues likely to come before the new Secretary within the first 30, 60, 90 days after the inauguration.
  • Hhs-Cdc-20-1415

    Hhs-Cdc-20-1415

    June 5, 2020 VIA EMAIL Freedom of Information Officer U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE Building 57, Room MS D-54 Atlanta, GA 30333 [email protected] Re: Expedited Freedom of Information Act Request Dear FOIA officer: Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the implementing regulations of your agency, 45 C.F.R Part 5, American Oversight makes the following request for records. The outbreak of the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, and the disease it causes, COVID-19, has been declared a public health emergency at both the national and international levels.1 Since late 2019, the virus has spread across the globe, sickened millions of people, and resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths.2 The virus has spread rapidly across meat processing plants, with over 115 facilities in nineteen states reporting outbreaks.3 At least 4,913 meat processing plant workers have contracted the virus and twenty have passed away from it.4 The CDC plays a critical role in gathering and analyzing data from factories, responding to requests for assistance from state and local authorities, and providing guidance for safety improvements. American Oversight submits this request to shed light on how the CDC is responding to Coronavirus outbreaks in meat processing facilities and what the agency is doing to protect the approximately 500,000 Americans who work in those facilities. 1 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Summary, CTRS. FOR DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/summary.html.
  • CDC's Response to the 2014–2016 Ebola Epidemic — West Africa And

    CDC's Response to the 2014–2016 Ebola Epidemic — West Africa And

    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Supplement / Vol. 65 / No. 3 July 8, 2016 CDC’s Response to the 2014–2016 Ebola Epidemic — West Africa and United States U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Supplement CONTENTS Editorial Committee Foreword ..................................................................................................................1 David M. Bell, MD (Guest co-editor)1 2 Overview, Control Strategies, and Lessons Learned in the CDC Inger Damon, MD, PhD (Guest co-editor) Sara R. Bedrosian3 Response to the 2014–2016 Ebola Epidemic............................................4 Valerie R. Johnson, MPH4 Jennifer H. McQuiston, DVM2 CDC’s Response to the 2014–2016 Ebola Epidemic — Guinea, Liberia, John O’Connor, MS4 and Sierra Leone............................................................................................... 12 Joint Information Center Staff Early Identification and Prevention of the Spread of Ebola in Brian J. Panasuk, MPH5 Laura A. Smith, MA4 High-Risk African Countries ......................................................................... 21 Maddison D. Bruer5 Incident Management Systems and Building Emergency Kondra C. Williams, MSPH5 Management Capacity during the 2014–2016 Ebola Epidemic — 1Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC 2Division of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea ..............................................................
  • Place of Birth for Foreign Born Population

    Place of Birth for Foreign Born Population

    Place of Birth for the Foreign Born Population City of Houston City of Houston Estimate Total Population 2,298,628 Total Foreign Born Population 696,210 Europe: 26,793 Northern Europe: 7,572 United Kingdom (inc. Crown Dependencies): 6,120 United Kingdom, excluding England and Scotland 2,944 England 2,714 Scotland 462 Ireland 196 Denmark 371 Norway 637 Sweden 248 Other Northern Europe 0 Western Europe: 5,660 Austria 170 Belgium 490 France 1,539 Germany 2,160 Netherlands 760 Switzerland 541 Other Western Europe 0 Southern Europe: 4,228 Greece 784 Italy 1,191 Portugal 358 Azores Islands 0 Spain 1,852 Other Southern Europe 43 Eastern Europe: 9,230 Albania 137 Belarus 58 Bulgaria 1,665 Croatia 49 Czechoslovakia (includes Czech Republic and Slovakia) 168 Hungary 774 Latvia 54 Lithuania 0 Macedonia 0 Moldova 53 Poland 1,012 Romania 769 Russia 1,857 Ukraine 974 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1,052 Serbia 268 Other Eastern Europe 340 Europe, n.e.c. 103 Asia: 149,239 Eastern Asia: 32,600 China: 25,169 China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan 19,044 Hong Kong 1,666 Taiwan 4,459 Japan 2,974 Korea 4,457 Other Eastern Asia 0 South Central Asia: 52,626 Afghanistan 2,341 Bangladesh 2,234 India 26,059 Iran 8,830 Kazakhstan 432 Nepal 3,181 Pakistan 6,954 Sri Lanka 79 Uzbekistan 656 Other South Central Asia 1,860 South Eastern Asia: 47,298 Cambodia 951 Indonesia 1,414 Laos 237 Malaysia 1,597 Burma 1,451 Philippines 10,892 Singapore 1,009 Thailand 1,912 Vietnam 27,835 Other South Eastern Asia 0 Western Asia: 16,466 Iraq 5,773 Israel 841 Jordan 1,760 Kuwait 224 Lebanon 1,846 Saudi Arabia 2,007 Syria 1,191 Yemen 0 Turkey 1,330 Armenia 79 Other Western Asia 1,415 Asia,n.e.c.
  • Regional Groupings

    Regional Groupings

    THE ITC STYLE GUIDE workload workstation rldwide worthwhile Regional Groupings 49 THE ITC STYLE GUIDE Country groups by region ITC staff and external writers frequently have questions about the use of regional groupings, and which countries apply. In all cases, ITC writers should use the proper country names. These are listed separately in this guide. Key terminology to use For regional groupings by development level, the UN uses the following broad terminology: developing countries, developed countries and transition economies. There is no established convention to designate developed and developing countries. Least developed countries (which currently total 47) are a subset of developing countries. Transition economies are in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Economies is a term used in economic writing among international organizations that refers to national economies. It is often used as a synonym for country. If you are writing in business terms, use the word “country” and not “economy.” Managing differences in terminology As part of the UN system, ITC follows UN practice. However, discrepancies exist between lists provided by the UN Statistical Division and UNCTAD. For example, UNCTAD notes that UNIDO uses the term ‘emerging industrial economies’, which is not used by the UN Statistical Division or by UNCTAD. This edition of the ITC Style Guide recommends that the listing from the UN Statistical Division be used as the first reference source. The list of countries and territories is included in full. Please use the list with care. Countries are sensitive regarding their regional groupings. Consult with the Communications and Events team, or the regional country offices in the ITC Division of Country Programmes if the lists in this edition do not address your writing needs.
  • “She Has a Unique Overview of Medicine and Health in America and Strong Ideas About Public Health As an Important Profession,” Said DPH Commissioner Dr

    “She Has a Unique Overview of Medicine and Health in America and Strong Ideas About Public Health As an Important Profession,” Said DPH Commissioner Dr

    CABINET FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICES OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Matthew G. Bevin Division of Communications Vickie Yates Brown Glisson 275 E. Main Street, 5C-A Governor Frankfort, KY 40621 Secretary (502) 564-6786 Fax: (502) 564-0274 www.chfs.ky.gov Statewide News Release Media Contact: Beth Fisher, (502) 564-6786, 3101 Barbara Fox, ext. 3102 Dr. Anne Schuchat, Acting CDC Director, Makes Day-Long Visit to CHFS Visit Focused On Opioid Epidemic, Health Data and Analytics FRANKFORT, KY. (June 30, 2017) – In one of her first official site visits since taking the helm of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Dr. Anne Schuchat met with public health officials in Kentucky to discuss various programs and policies impacting the state’s public health system. Dr. Schuchat, CDC’s acting director, participated in day-long activities with staff from the Department for Public Health (DPH), within the Cabinet for Health and Family Services (CHFS), related to Kentucky’s opioid and drug overdose epidemic as well as sessions dealing with health data and analytics. “I appreciate the chance to learn from the partnerships and programs that Kentucky has established to tackle the opioid epidemic and other public health challenges, said Dr. Schuchat, following her visit to Kentucky. “Hearing from people from public health, academia, coalitions, and public safety made a strong impression on me of the crucial role that partnerships play in protecting people’s health in Kentucky.” “We were tremendously honored to host Dr. Schuchat in Kentucky today and greatly appreciate her time and invaluable insights into the American public health system,” said CHFS Secretary Vickie Yates Brown Glisson.
  • Link to Chapter

    Link to Chapter

    1. THE BIG PICTURE This chapter provides a snapshot of intentional Fig. 1.1: Total number of homicides, homicide through an increasingly focused lens. by region (2012 or latest year) Beginning at the global level and ending at the sub- national level, it subsequently looks at homicide Americas from the perspective of age and sex before analysing 157,000 homicide trends from 1955 to the present. Whether Africa across regions, sub-regions and countries, age and 135,000 sex groups, and even over time, the picture of hom- icide it reveals is one of marked contrasts. Asia 122,000 The global and regional picture Europe UNODC estimates that deaths resulting from 22,000 intentional homicide amounted to a total of Oceania 437,0001 at the global level in 2012. The largest 1,100 share of those was registered in the Americas (36 per cent) and large shares were also recorded in 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 Africa and Asia (31 per cent and 28 per cent, Number of homicides respectively). Europe (5 per cent) and Oceania (0.3 per cent) accounted for the lowest shares of Source: UNODC Homicide Statistics (2013). The bars repre- sent total homicide counts based on the source selected at the homicide by region. country level, with low and high estimates derived from total counts based on additional sources existing at the country level. Between 2010 and 2012 the number of homicide victims decreased by 11-14 per cent in Oceania and Europe, and increased by 8.5 per cent in the of homicide victims in Africa and some countries Americas, yet the fact that UNODC’s 2012 global in Asia.

  • NHRI Infographic English

    Indicator 16.a.1 - Existence of national human rights institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles 2018: 39% OF COUNTRIES HAVE INTERNATIONALLY COMPLIANT NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS (NHRI) WHILE 60% HAVE SOUGHT TO ESTABLISH ONE A country with a category "A" NHRI complies with universal standards adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1993 (the "Paris Principles"), and guarantees its NHRI: A broad human rights monitoring mandate Adequate powers of investigation Autonomy from government A pluralist composition Sufficient resources to support operations countries have countries have an applied for review NHRI accredited 118 of compliance with under category the Paris Principles 77 "A" Global disparity: some regions are at risk of being left behind Proportion of Countries with Category A NHRI, by Region, as of 2018 100% 52% 41% 40% 39% 35% 29% 29% 8% AUSTRALIA NORTHERN LATIN SUB-SAHARAN WORLD EASTERN WESTERN CENTRAL OCEANIA AND NEW AMERICA AMERICA AFRICA AND ASIA AND AND ZEALAND AND AND THE SOUTH- NORTHERN SOUTHERN EUROPE CARIBBEAN EASTERN AFRICA ASIA ASIA Slow progress: At the current annual average rate of progress, only 54% of countries will have a category "A" NHRI by 2030 At this pace, the 100% target would only be achieved after 2060. Accelerating the Pace of Progress Target: All Countries with Internationally Compliant NHRI by 2030 250 197 200 187 177 167 157 147 150 137 127 117 107 103 106 97 96 99 101 89 92 94 100 87 84 87 77 80 82 70 72 75 50 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
  • The Size, Place of Birth, and Geographic Distribution of the Foreign-Born Population in the United States: 1960 to 2010

    The Size, Place of Birth, and Geographic Distribution of the Foreign-Born Population in the United States: 1960 to 2010

    The Size, Place of Birth, and Geographic Distribution of the Foreign-Born Population in the United States: 1960 to 2010 Elizabeth M. Grieco, Edward Trevelyan, Luke Larsen, Yesenia D. Acosta, Christine Gambino, Patricia de la Cruz, Tom Gryn, and Nathan Walters Population Division Population Division Working Paper No. 96 U.S. Census Bureau Washington, D.C. 20233 October 2012 This paper is released to inform interested parties of ongoing research and to encourage discussion of work in progress. Any views expressed on methodological, technical, or operational issues are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U.S. Census Bureau. Abstract During the last 50 years, the foreign-born population of the United States has undergone dramatic changes, shifting from an older, predominantly European population settled in the Northeast and Midwest to a younger, predominantly Latin American and Asian population settled in the West and South. This paper uses data from the 1960 to 2000 decennial censuses and the 2010 American Community Survey to describe changes in the size, origins, and geographic distribution of the foreign-born population. First, the historic growth of the foreign- born population is reviewed. Next, changes in the distribution by place of birth are discussed, focusing on the simultaneous decline of the foreign born from Europe and increase from Latin America and Asia. The geographic distribution among the states and regions within the United States will then be reviewed. The median age and age distribution for the period will also be discussed. This paper will conclude with a brief analysis of how the foreign-born population has contributed to the growth of the total population over the last 50 years.
  • 3 Appendix 1. United Nations Geoscheme the United Nations

    3 Appendix 1. United Nations Geoscheme the United Nations

    Appendix 1. United Nations Geoscheme The United Nations Geoscheme divides the world into regions and sub-regions. This assignment is for statistical convenience and does not imply any assumption regarding political or other affiliation of countries or territories. Table 1. United Nations Geoscheme (data from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/) Region Sub-region Countries and Territories Africa Northern Africa Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Sudan, Tunisia, Western Sahara Eastern Africa British Indian Ocean Territory, Burundi, Comoros, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, French Southern Territories, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mayotte, Mozambique, Réunion, Rwanda, Seychelles, Somalia, South Sudan, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe Middle Africa Angola, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Sao Tome and Principe Southern Africa Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho, Namibia, South Africa Western Africa Benin, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Saint Helena, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Togo Americas Latin America and the Caribbean: Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas, Barbados, Bonaire, Sint Caribbean Eustatius and Saba, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Cuba, Curaçao, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Haiti, Jamaica, Martinique, Montserrat, Puerto Rico, Saint Barthélemy, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Martin (French Part),
  • The Foreign-Born Population in the United States

    The Foreign-Born Population in the United States

    The Foreign-Born Population in the United States Since 1970, the foreign-born population has continued to increase in size and as a percent of the total population. Today, the majority of foreign born are from Latin America and Asia. Considerable differences exist among the different country-of-birth groups in various characteristics. About 1 in 4 children under 18 in families have at least one foreign-born parent. 1 Defining Nativity Status: Foreign Born and Native Born Native born – Anyone who is a U.S. citizen at birth • Born in the United States • Born in Puerto Rico • Born in a U.S. Island Area (e.g., Guam) • Born abroad of U.S. citizen parent(s) Foreign born – Anyone who is not a U.S. citizen at birth • Naturalized U.S. citizens • Legal permanent residents • Temporary migrants • Humanitarian migrants • Unauthorized migrants 2 Foreign-Born Population and Percentage of Total Population, for the United States: 1850 to 2010 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census of Population, 1850 to 2000, and the American Community Survey, 2010. 3 Foreign-Born Population by Region of Birth: 1960 to 2010 (Numbers in millions) Other areas Asia Latin America and the Caribbean Europe Note: Other areas includes Africa, Northern America, Oceania, born at sea, and not reported. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census of Population, 1960 to 2000 and the American Community Survey, 2010. 4 Percentage of the Foreign-Born Population from Central America: 1960 to 2010 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census of Population, 1960 to 2000 and the American Community Survey, 2010. 5 Percentage of the Foreign-Born Population from Mexico and Other Central America: 1960 to 2010 Source: U.S.