DOCSLIB.ORG

Distribution of Fishes and Changes in Biotic Integrity in the New River, Tennessee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Distribution of Fishes and Changes in Biotic Integrity in the New River, Tennessee University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-1998 Distribution of Fishes and Changes in Biotic Integrity in the New River, Tennessee R. Brian Evans University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Evans, R. Brian, "Distribution of Fishes and Changes in Biotic Integrity in the New River, Tennessee. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1998. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2585 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by R. Brian Evans entitled "Distribution of Fishes and Changes in Biotic Integrity in the New River, Tennessee." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Animal Science. David A. Etnier, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Dewey Bunting, Richard Strange Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by R. Brian Evans entitled "Distribution of Fishes and Changes in Biotic Integrity in the New River, Tennessee." I have examined the final copy of this thesis fo r fo rm and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements fo r the degree ofMaster of Science, with a major in Zoology. We have read tllis thesis and recommend its acceptance: Accepted fo r the Council: Associate Vice Chancellor and Dean ofThe Graduate School DISTRIBUTION OF FISHES AND CHANGES IN BIOTIC INTEGRITY IN THE NEW RIVER, TENNESSEE A Thesis Presented fo r the Master of Science Degree The University ofTennesse, Knoxville R. Brian Evans May 1998 11 Dedication To my Grandmother, for her love and eucouragement and for sharing in my childhood explorations of streams. l1l Acknowledgments Completion of this thesis was accomplished with the assistance of several people to whom I am grateful. I thank my major professor, Dave Etnier, for suggesting this study, providing encouragement and direction, and exhibiting confidence in me during my research. For their editing and constructive critique of this thesis, I thank the other members of my graduate committee, Dewey Bunting and Richard Strange. Many people helped me complete my field work. I am particularly grateful to Bo Baxter, Barry Hart, and Chris Paxton fo r accompanying me on almost every collecting trip. Their knowledge of the aquatic fauna of the Big South Fork system, since of humor, and friendship made my research a very enjoyable experience. I appreciate the time and effort spent by several other individuals who helped collect fishes: Steve Fraley, Barron Moody, Chris Skelton, Shea Eskew, Shea Gaither, Denny Smith, and Brad Tarbert (UT); Tammy Mendelson (Duke); and Liz Etnier. I thank Steve Bakaletz (BSFNR), who in addition to helping collect fishes, coordinated access to portions of the New River within National Park and private land boundaries. Three people from the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, Rick Bivens, Bart Carter, and Carl Williams , graciously provided their expertise and equipment to complete the large river sample. I also thank Dave McKinney (TWRA) for orchestrating the funding thatsupported this research. Lastly, I thank my wife, Kim, for being patient and supportive while I pursued my interests. lV Abstract Electro fishingsamples of fishes were obtained from forty-two localities in the New River system. Tennessee during summer and fall 1996. Eight of forty-two species collected represent new records from the New River: Notropis telescopus, Moxostoma macrolepidotum breviceps, M carinatum, Lepomis auritus, L. gulosus, L. microlophus, Etheostoma cinereum, and Stizostedion vitreum. Temporal changes in the distribution of fisheswere detected by comparing historical collection records with fishsamples from 1996. Older records were also employed in the compilation of a modified index of biotic integrity (IBI) that was used to assess changes in fishassemblage health during the past twenty years. Positive changes in the distribution of fishes and the IBI indicate that water quality and fishassemblages have improved in the New River over the past two decades. subsequent to federal legislation that required decreased input of sediment and mine drainage into the Big South Fork of the Cumberland River system. v TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION ........................ ..................... ........................................ ........ 1 2. STUDY AREA ........................ ... ... .......... ................................................... ... .. ...2 3. HISTORY OF WATER QUALITY ...........................................................................5 4. FISH SAMPLING METHODS ..................................................................................9 5. ANNOTATED LIST OF FISHES ..... ................ ............... ........................ ... .... ...... 12 6. ANALYSIS OF FISH ASSEMBLAGES ...................................................................39 Description and History of the IBI.. .....................................................................39 Modifications ofthe IBI fo r the New River.. ...................................................... .41 Development of Metric Scoring Criteria .. .................... ........ .......... ........ ........... 52 Relationship Between Sampling and the IBI .......................... ......... ....... ... ........ 55 IBI Scores and Evaluation ofNew River Streams ...............................................60 7. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS ................ ............ ... ... ... 74 LITERATURE CITED ....................................................................................................76 APPENDICES .................................................................................................................84 Appendix 1. List of localities sampled in the New River system ......... .............. 85 Appendix 2. Summary offishcol lections from the New River system .............90 Appendix 3. Number of each species, species richness, IBI score, and metric value summary ......................................................... .... ... 1 05 Appendix 4. Distribution and scoring of metric values .......... ... ........ ...... ... ....... 153 Appendix 5. Site size components ...................................................................... 160 Appendix 6. Individual, mean, and median, IBI, metric, and diversity values ............................................................................................. 163 VITA ................................................................................................................................ l69 VI LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1. Number of individuals and species relative abundance ...... ..... ............. ...................... 13 2. Original IBI metrics used to assess fish communities in the Midwest and metrics used for the New River system ... ................................. ............ .......................40 3. Ecological guilds of fishes known from the New River ...... ...... .... ....................... .. ...45 4. IBI metric scoring criteria ... .............. ............. .......... ..... ... ... ..... ............... ... ........... .....54 5. IndividuaL mean, and median IBI, metric and diversity score comparison ................57 6. IBI score range and qualitative classification.. ....... ...... .......... ...................................64 7. Qualitative ranking and classification based on IBI scores of streams sampled in the New River .......... ...... ...... .......................................... ........................................65 1. Introduction This thesis reports the results of an ichthyofaunal survey conducted during the summer and fall of 1996 in streams throughout the New River basin, Tennessee. After completion of the survey. the present distribution of fishes was compared with historical records to determine spatial and temporal variation in fish community composition that coincided with changes in watershed land use, primarily surface coal mining. Research presented herein was undertaken because the ichthyofauna of the area has been poorly studied over the previous twenty years. probably because the region was believed to be too degraded to posses healthy communities or interesting taxa. Compared to other river systems in Tennessee, few collection records from the New River were available. Improved land use activities initiated by federal legislation were anticipated to have had positive effects on the integrity of fishcomm unities. The law that established the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area (BSFNRA) (Public Law 93-25 1, 1974), in reference to downstream portions of the New River and most of the Big South Fork River, directed state and federal agencies in Tennessee to II •••enhance the environment and conserve
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Eastern Belted Kingfisher in the Maritime 1?
    BULLETIN NO. 97 The Eastern Belted Kingfisher - in the Maritime 1?rovinces BY H. C. WHITE Atlantic Biological Station PUBLISHED BY THE FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA UNDER THE CONTROL OF TH E HON. THE MINISTER OF FISHERIES fTAWA, 1953 II BULLETIN NO. 97 The Eastern Belted I(ingfisher in the Maritime Provinces BY H. C. WHITE Atlantic Biological Station PUBLISHED BY THE FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA UND ER THE CONTROL OF THE HON. THE MINISTER OF FISHERIES OTTAWA, 1953 Printed by THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO PREss . for the FISHERIES REsEARCH BOARD OF CANADA CO N TENTS INTRODUCTION 1 Hand-rearing young kingfishers 2 LIFE HISTORY 4 Migration, flights and dispersal 4 Distribution 5 Nesting sites 5 Making the burrow 9 Nest cavity and nest 10 Incubation and nestlings 11 Activities in nest 13 Sanitation 14 Enemies 16 Night roosts 19 Feeding 19 ANALYSES OF PELLETS AND STOMACH CONTENTS 21 Analyses 22 FOOD 25 Trout-rearing streams 27 Small salmon-rearing streams 29 Medium and large salmon rivers 33 Marginal salmon waters 37 Lakes and ponds 38 Sea shore 40 ECONOMIC STATUS 41 REFERENCES 43 INTROD UCTION THIS STUDY of the life history and food of the kingfisher (Megaceryle alcyon alcyon L. ) in the "Maritimes", i.e. the provinces of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island, is part of a general study of the relation of fish­ eating birds to the production of salmon and trout and is based on observations and material colleoted over a period of many years. We have received help from many of our co-workers and others and we wish to express special gratitude to A.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5
    Summary Report of Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 Summary Report of Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 Prepared by: Amy J. Benson, Colette C. Jacono, Pam L. Fuller, Elizabeth R. McKercher, U.S. Geological Survey 7920 NW 71st Street Gainesville, Florida 32653 and Myriah M. Richerson Johnson Controls World Services, Inc. 7315 North Atlantic Avenue Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 North Fairfax Drive Arlington, VA 22203 29 February 2004 Table of Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………... ...1 Aquatic Macrophytes ………………………………………………………………….. ... 2 Submersed Plants ………...………………………………………………........... 7 Emergent Plants ………………………………………………………….......... 13 Floating Plants ………………………………………………………………..... 24 Fishes ...…………….…………………………………………………………………..... 29 Invertebrates…………………………………………………………………………...... 56 Mollusks …………………………………………………………………………. 57 Bivalves …………….………………………………………………........ 57 Gastropods ……………………………………………………………... 63 Nudibranchs ………………………………………………………......... 68 Crustaceans …………………………………………………………………..... 69 Amphipods …………………………………………………………….... 69 Cladocerans …………………………………………………………..... 70 Copepods ……………………………………………………………….. 71 Crabs …………………………………………………………………...... 72 Crayfish ………………………………………………………………….. 73 Isopods ………………………………………………………………...... 75 Shrimp ………………………………………………………………….... 75 Amphibians and Reptiles …………………………………………………………….. 76 Amphibians ……………………………………………………………….......... 81 Toads and Frogs
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey of Morgan County, Tennessee
    United States In cooperation with Department of Tennessee Agricultural Agriculture Experiment Station, Soil Survey of Tennessee Department of Natural Agriculture, Morgan Morgan County, Resources County, and Morgan Conservation County Soil Conservation Service District Tennessee How To Use This Soil Survey The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets. Note the number of the map sheet and go to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. Go to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. iii This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 2002. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 2002. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 2002. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station, the Tennessee Department of Agriculture, Morgan County, and the Morgan County Soil Conservation District.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Habitat and Fish Report Baseline Conditions
    Interprovincial Crossings Environmental Assessment Study Aquatic Habitat and Fish Report Baseline Conditions Final Report November 18, 2008 AQUATIC HABITAT AND FISH REPORT BASELINE CONDITIONS REPORT NOVEMBER 2008 F INAL REPORT AQUATIC HABITAT AND FISH (BASELINE CONDITIONS) Table of Contents GLOSSARY OF TECHNICAL TERMS..................... 1-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................... 1-1 1.1 Methodology ........................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Baseline Environmental Conditions ........................... 1-1 1.1.2 Study Area .................................................................. 1-4 1.1.3 Assessment of Environmental Constraints ................. 1-4 2.0 OTTAWA RIVER GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS..................................... 2-1 2.1 Hydrography – General Description ....................................... 2-1 2.2 Natural environment, recreation and tourism.......................... 2-2 2.3 Water quality........................................................................... 2-3 2.4 Variations between corridors................................................... 2-3 3.0 CHARACTERIZATION OF FISH SPECIES ...... 3-1 3.1 Fish species found in the Ottawa River................................... 3-1 3.2 Characterization of spawning sites.......................................... 3-8 4.0 SPECIES WITH SPECIAL STATUS ................. 4-1 4.1 The Channel Darter ................................................................. 4-2 4.2 The River Redhorse................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cutlip Minnow,Exoglossum Maxillingua
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Cutlip Minnow Exoglossum maxillingua in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2013 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2013. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Cutlip Minnow Exoglossum maxillingua in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. x + 35 pp. (www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Previous report(s): Crossman, E.J.1994. COSEWIC status report on the Cutlip Minnow Exoglossum maxillingua in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 32 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Dr. Nicholas Mandrak, Lynn D. Bouvier, Mary Burridge and Erling Holm for writing the status report on the Cutlip Minnow, Exoglossum maxillingue, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Dr. Eric Taylor, Co- chair of the COSEWIC Freshwater Fishes Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le Bec-de-lièvre (Exoglossum maxillingua) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Cutlip Minnow — Reproduced with permission by Bureau of Fisheries, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2014. Catalogue No. CW69-14/683-2014E-PDF ISBN 978-1-100-23553-0 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2013 Common name Cutlip Minnow Scientific name Exoglossum maxillingua Status Special Concern Reason for designation This small-bodied freshwater fish occurs across a relatively small area in eastern Ontario and Quebec where it has been lost from two watersheds over the last 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Blackside Dace (Chrosomus Cumberlandensis) and the Cumberland Arrow Darter (Etheostoma Sagitta) in Northeast Tennessee
    WATER QUALITY’S INFLUENCE ON THE OCCUPANCY OF TWO JEOPARDIZED FISHES: THE BLACKSIDE DACE (CHROSOMUS CUMBERLANDENSIS) AND THE CUMBERLAND ARROW DARTER (ETHEOSTOMA SAGITTA) IN NORTHEAST TENNESSEE __________________________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the College of Science Morehead State University _________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science _________________________ by Brandon L. Yates July 5, 2017 ProQuest Number:10605069 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ProQuest 10605069 Published by ProQuest LLC ( 2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346 Accepted by the faculty of the College of Science, Morehead State University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science degree. ______________________________ David J. Eisenhour Director of Thesis Master’s Committee: ________________________________, Chair David J. Eisenhour _________________________________ Brian C. Reeder _________________________________ David P. Smith _________________________________ Michael C. Compton ________________________ Date WATER QUALITY’S INFLUENCE ON THE OCCUPANCY OF TWO JEOPARDIZED FISHES: THE BLACKSIDE DACE (CHROSOMUS CUMBERLANDENSIS) AND THE CUMBERLAND ARROW DARTER (ETHEOSTOMA SAGITTA) IN NORTHEAST TENNESSEE Brandon L. Yates Morehead State University, 2017 Director of Thesis: __________________________________________________ David J.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Species Mapping in North Carolina Using Maxent
    Aquatic Species Mapping in North Carolina Using Maxent Mark Endries U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services Field Office, Asheville North Carolina INTRODUCTION The mission of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is to work with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. The Service is the lead governmental agency involved in the recovery of federally endangered and threatened species in freshwater and terrestrial habitats. To meet its recovery and protection goals, the Service: (1) works with other federal agencies to minimize or eliminate impacts to fish, wildlife, and plants from projects they authorize, fund, or carry out; (2) supports the improvement of fish and wildlife habitat on private land through technical and financial assistance; and (3) provides scientific knowledge and analyses to help guide the conservation, development, and management of the Nation’s fish and wildlife resources. Freshwater ecosystems present unique management challenges due to their linear spatial orientation and their association with upland habitat variables. On broad scales, the movement of aquatic species within the stream environment is limited to upstream and downstream migration. The inability of aquatic species to circumnavigate man-made obstacles causes them to be particularly vulnerable to habitat fragmentation. Habitat fragmentation has a major influence on species distribution and complicates distribution mapping. To better understand the spatial distributions of freshwater aquatic species in North Carolina, the Service created predictive habitat maps for 226 different aquatic species using geographic information systems (GIS) and maximum entropy (Maxent) modeling. These maps were derived by comparing known species occurrences with a suite of stream- or land-cover-derived environmental variables.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from The
    Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from the 1940s to the 1990s by MATTHEW R. WINSTON Missouri Department of Conservation, Columbia, MO 65201 February 2003 CONTENTS Page Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… 10 Methods……………………………………………………………………………….. 17 The Data Used………………………………………………………………… 17 General Patterns in Species Change…………………………………………... 23 Conservation Status of Species……………………………………………….. 26 Results………………………………………………………………………………… 34 General Patterns in Species Change………………………………………….. 30 Conservation Status of Species……………………………………………….. 46 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………….. 63 General Patterns in Species Change………………………………………….. 53 Conservation Status of Species………………………………………………. 63 Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………. 66 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………………….. 66 Appendix……………………………………………………………………………… 72 FIGURES 1. Distribution of samples by principal investigator…………………………. 20 2. Areas of greatest average decline…………………………………………. 33 3. Areas of greatest average expansion………………………………………. 34 4. The relationship between number of basins and ……………………….. 39 5. The distribution of for each reproductive group………………………... 40 2 6. The distribution of for each family……………………………………… 41 7. The distribution of for each trophic group……………...………………. 42 8. The distribution of for each faunal region………………………………. 43 9. The distribution of for each stream type………………………………… 44 10. The distribution of for each range edge…………………………………. 45 11. Modified
    [Show full text]
  • Cumberland Plateau Geological History
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area Oneida, Tennessee Geology and History of the Cumberland Plateau Geological History Rising over 1000 feet above the region around it, the Cumberland Plateau is a large, flat-topped tableland. Deceptively rugged, the Plateau has often acted as a barrier to man and nature’s attempts to overcome it. The Plateau is characterized by rugged terrain, a moderate climate, and abundant rainfall. Although the soils are typically thin and infertile, the area was once covered by a dense hardwood forest equal to that of the Appalachians less than sixty miles to the east. As a landform, this great plateau reaches from north-central Alabama through Tennessee and Kentucky and Pennsylvania to the western New York border. Geographers call this landform the Appalachian Plateau, although it is known by various names as it passes through the differ­ ent regions. In Tennessee and Kentucky, it is called the Cumberland Plateau. Within this region, the Cumberland River and its tributaries are formed. A view from any over- look quickly confirms that the area is indeed a plateau. The adjoining ridges are all the same height, presenting a flat horizon. The River Systems The Clear Fork River and the New River come together to form the Big South Fork of the Cumberland River, the third largest tributary to the Cumberland. The Big South Fork watershed drains an area of 1382 square Leatherwood Ford in the evening sun miles primarily in Scott, Fentress, and Morgan counties in Tennessee and Wayne and Overlooks McCreary counties in Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Native and Naturalized Fauna of Virginia
    Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources List of Native and Naturalized Fauna of Virginia August, 2020 (* denotes naturalized species; ** denotes species native to some areas of Virginia and naturalized in other areas of Virginia) Common Name Scientific Name FISHES: Freshwater Fishes: Alabama Bass * Micropterus henshalli * Alewife Alosa pseudoharengus American Brook Lamprey Lampetra appendix American Eel Anguilla rostrata American Shad Alosa sapidissima Appalachia Darter Percina gymnocephala Ashy Darter Etheostoma cinereum Atlantic Sturgeon Acipenser oxyrhynchus Banded Darter Etheostoma zonale Banded Drum Larimus fasciatus Banded Killifish Fundulus diaphanus Banded Sculpin Cottus carolinae Banded Sunfish Ennaecanthus obesus Bigeye Chub Hybopsis amblops Bigeye Jumprock Moxostoma ariommum Bigmouth Chub Nocomis platyrhynchus Black Bullhead Ameiurus melas Black Crappie Pomoxis nigromaculatus Blacktip Jumprock Moxostoma cervinum Black Redhorse Moxostoma duquesnei Black Sculpin Cottus baileyi Blackbanded Sunfish Enneacanthus chaetodon Blacknose Dace Rhinichthys atratulus Blackside Dace Chrosomus cumberlandensis Blackside Darter Percina maculata Blotched Chub Erimystax insignis Blotchside Logperch Percina burtoni Blue Catfish * Ictalurus furcatus * Blue Ridge Sculpin Cottus caeruleomentum Blueback Herring Alosa aestivalis Bluebreast Darter Etheostoma camurum Bluegill Lepomis macrochirus Bluehead Chub Nocomis leptocephalus Blueside Darter Etheostoma jessiae Bluespar Darter Etheostoma meadiae Bluespotted Sunfish Enneacanthus gloriosus Bluestone
    [Show full text]
  • Rugby Burnt Mill
    The Clear Fork River The Big South Fork River near the Gentleman's Swimming Hole from the Honey Creek Overlook Cutting deeply into the Cumberland Plateau, the Clear Fork and New Rivers come together at the Confluence to form the Big South Fork of the Cumberland River. Their main channels decend approximately eleven feet per mile. The swiftness of free-flowing water through the boulder-filled river beds have created a paddler’s paradise. Although the rugged terrain limits access, there are several popular hiking trails in the south end of the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Rugby Thomas Huges, author of Tom Brown’s beautiful walk between the high bluffs School Days and a renouned social and the river leads to a low rock ledge reformer from England, established the and a great place to sit and enjoy the Gentlemens Swimming experimental community of Rugby in sights and sounds of the creek. Hole 1880. One result of his progressive However, this ledge may be under thinking was his creation of public park water after a heavy rain. The land along the Clear Fork River for the moderate/strenuous 2.1 mile loop to residents of Rubgy to enjoy. Several the trailhead can be completed by trails were developed leading to the climbing to the ridgetop and following river. the old roadbed. The moderate 0.4 mile hike to the From Oneida, TN take U.S. 27 south to Gentlemens Swimming Hole passes a Elgin. Turn right on Tenn. 52 and drive 7 small waterfall in the creek and Witches’ miles to Rugby.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Pigtoe Species Status Assessment
    Species Status Assessment Report for the Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni) Version 1.3 Atlantic Pigtoes from Swift Creek (Neuse), NC (credit: T.Dickinson, Three Oaks Engineering) April 2019 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4 Atlanta, GA This document was prepared by Sarah McRae (USFWS-Raleigh Field Office) with assistance from Angela Romito (USFWS-Region 4), Erin Rivenbark (USFWS-Region 4), Susan Oetker (USFWS-Region 2), Beth Forbus (USFWS-HQ), and the Atlantic Pigtoe SSA Technical Advisory Team (Tyler Black-NC Wildlife Resources Commission, Arthur Bogan-NC Museum of Natural Sciences, Chris Eads-NC State University, Judith Ratcliffe-NC Natural Heritage Program, Brian Watson-VA Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, and Jason Wisniewski-GA Department of Natural Resources). Valuable peer reviews of a draft of this document were provided by John Alderman (Alderman Environmental Services, Inc.) and Brena Jones (NC Wildlife Resources Commission), and additional review was provided by Jennifer Stanhope (USFWS-Virginia Field Office). We appreciate the time and effort of those dedicated to learning and implementing the SSA Framework, which resulted in a more robust assessment and final report. Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2019. Species status assessment report for the Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni). Version 1.3. April, 2019. Atlanta, GA. Atlantic Pigtoe SSA Report Page ii April 2019 Summary of Version Updates The changes from version 1.0 (December 2016) and 1.1 (February 2017) are minor and do not change the SSA Analysis for Atlantic Pigtoe. The changes were: 1) Changed title of Figure 3-18 from Atlantic Pigtoe Current Representation to Atlantic Pigtoe Current Condition.
    [Show full text]