DOCSLIB.ORG

Soil Survey of Morgan County, Tennessee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soil Survey of Morgan County, Tennessee United States In cooperation with Department of Tennessee Agricultural Agriculture Experiment Station, Soil Survey of Tennessee Department of Natural Agriculture, Morgan Morgan County, Resources County, and Morgan Conservation County Soil Conservation Service District Tennessee How To Use This Soil Survey The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets. Note the number of the map sheet and go to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. Go to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. iii This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 2002. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 2002. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 2002. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station, the Tennessee Department of Agriculture, Morgan County, and the Morgan County Soil Conservation District. The survey is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Morgan County Soil Conservation District. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission. Enlargement of these maps, however, could cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, or, where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, or political beliefs, as a means of reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice or TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 800-795- 3272 or 202-720-6382 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover: An area of Lily loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes, is in the foreground. An area of Allegheny- Cotaco complex, occasionally flooded, is on the flood plain in the center. An area of Gilpin-Bouldin- Petros complex, 25 to 75 percent slopes, very stony, is on the mountainsides in the background. Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available online from the Natural Resources Conservation Service at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov. iv Contents Cover .............................................................................................................................i How To Use This Soil Survey ..................................................................................... iii Contents...................................................................................................................... v Foreword ..................................................................................................................... ix Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 General Nature of the Survey Area .......................................................................... 1 How This Survey Was Made .................................................................................... 4 Detailed Soil Map Units ............................................................................................. 7 Ac—Allegheny-Cotaco complex, occasionally flooded ............................................ 8 At—Atkins silt loam, frequently flooded.................................................................. 10 Bm—Bethesda-Mines pit complex, 10 to 80 percent slopes .................................. 11 GnC—Gilpin silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes ....................................................... 13 GnD—Gilpin silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes ..................................................... 14 GpE—Gilpin-Petros complex, 20 to 35 percent slopes .......................................... 16 GpF—Gilpin-Petros complex, 35 to 80 percent slopes .......................................... 18 GsF—Gilpin-Bouldin-Petros complex, 25 to 80 percent slopes, very stony ........... 19 HeB—Hendon silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes ...................................................... 21 HeC—Hendon silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes .................................................... 23 JnF—Jefferson cobbly loam, 20 to 50 percent slopes, stony ................................. 25 LbB—Lily loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes.................................................................... 26 LbC—Lily loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes ................................................................. 28 LbD—Lily loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes ............................................................... 29 LgC—Lily-Gilpin complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes.................................................. 31 LgD—Lily-Gilpin complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes................................................ 33 LgE—Lily-Gilpin complex, 20 to 35 percent slopes ................................................ 34 LmC—Lily-Ramsey complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes............................................. 36 LmD—Lily-Ramsey complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes........................................... 38 LmE—Lily-Ramsey complex, 20 to 35 percent slopes ........................................... 40 LoB—Lonewood silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes ................................................... 41 LoC—Lonewood silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes ................................................. 43 Pp—Pope-Philo complex, frequently flooded ......................................................... 45 RaC—Ramsey-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes ............................. 46 RaD—Ramsey-Rock outcrop complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes ........................... 48 RaF—Ramsey-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes............................ 50 SeC—Sequoia silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes .................................................... 51 SeD—Sequoia silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes .................................................. 53 ShC—Shelocta silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes ................................................... 54 ShD—Shelocta silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes ................................................. 56 ShE—Shelocta silt loam, 20 to 35 percent slopes ................................................. 58 W—Water............................................................................................................... 59 WrB—Wernock silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes ..................................................... 59 WrC—Wernock silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes ................................................... 61 Use and Management of the Soils .......................................................................... 63 Interpretive Ratings ................................................................................................ 63 Rating Class Terms............................................................................................ 63 v Numerical Ratings ............................................................................................. 63 Crops and Pasture ................................................................................................. 64 Yields per Acre .................................................................................................. 65 Land Capability Classification ............................................................................ 65 Prime Farmland ................................................................................................. 66 Forest Productivity and Management .................................................................... 67 Forest Productivity ............................................................................................. 67 Forest Management ........................................................................................... 68 Recreation.............................................................................................................. 70 Wildlife Habitat ....................................................................................................... 72 Engineering ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cumberland Plateau Geological History
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area Oneida, Tennessee Geology and History of the Cumberland Plateau Geological History Rising over 1000 feet above the region around it, the Cumberland Plateau is a large, flat-topped tableland. Deceptively rugged, the Plateau has often acted as a barrier to man and nature’s attempts to overcome it. The Plateau is characterized by rugged terrain, a moderate climate, and abundant rainfall. Although the soils are typically thin and infertile, the area was once covered by a dense hardwood forest equal to that of the Appalachians less than sixty miles to the east. As a landform, this great plateau reaches from north-central Alabama through Tennessee and Kentucky and Pennsylvania to the western New York border. Geographers call this landform the Appalachian Plateau, although it is known by various names as it passes through the differ­ ent regions. In Tennessee and Kentucky, it is called the Cumberland Plateau. Within this region, the Cumberland River and its tributaries are formed. A view from any over- look quickly confirms that the area is indeed a plateau. The adjoining ridges are all the same height, presenting a flat horizon. The River Systems The Clear Fork River and the New River come together to form the Big South Fork of the Cumberland River, the third largest tributary to the Cumberland. The Big South Fork watershed drains an area of 1382 square Leatherwood Ford in the evening sun miles primarily in Scott, Fentress, and Morgan counties in Tennessee and Wayne and Overlooks McCreary counties in Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Rugby Burnt Mill
    The Clear Fork River The Big South Fork River near the Gentleman's Swimming Hole from the Honey Creek Overlook Cutting deeply into the Cumberland Plateau, the Clear Fork and New Rivers come together at the Confluence to form the Big South Fork of the Cumberland River. Their main channels decend approximately eleven feet per mile. The swiftness of free-flowing water through the boulder-filled river beds have created a paddler’s paradise. Although the rugged terrain limits access, there are several popular hiking trails in the south end of the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Rugby Thomas Huges, author of Tom Brown’s beautiful walk between the high bluffs School Days and a renouned social and the river leads to a low rock ledge reformer from England, established the and a great place to sit and enjoy the Gentlemens Swimming experimental community of Rugby in sights and sounds of the creek. Hole 1880. One result of his progressive However, this ledge may be under thinking was his creation of public park water after a heavy rain. The land along the Clear Fork River for the moderate/strenuous 2.1 mile loop to residents of Rubgy to enjoy. Several the trailhead can be completed by trails were developed leading to the climbing to the ridgetop and following river. the old roadbed. The moderate 0.4 mile hike to the From Oneida, TN take U.S. 27 south to Gentlemens Swimming Hole passes a Elgin. Turn right on Tenn. 52 and drive 7 small waterfall in the creek and Witches’ miles to Rugby.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee State Library and Archives Mckenzie & Son Collection, 1889
    State of Tennessee Department of State Tennessee State Library and Archives McKenzie & Son Collection, 1889-1955 COLLECTION SUMMARY Creator: McKenzie, Alexander Ross, Sr., 1856-1927 McKenzie, Alexander Ross, Jr., 1882-1969 Inclusive Dates: 1889-1955 Scope & Content: Consists of volumes and abstracts, court cases, charters, company files, individual files, indexed deed entries, survey books and notes, reports, maps, business records, and personal records all relating to the McKenzie and Son surveying business based in Chattanooga (Tenn.) from approximately 1903 to 1919. Many of the maps were too damaged and fragile to retain and are only available on microfilm. A complete listing of physical maps and microfilm only maps is also attached. Physical Description/Extent: 74 cubic feet and 5 map drawers Accession/Record Group Number: 82-107, mf. 1477 Language: English Permanent Location: XV-J-M; XV-J-1-4; XV-K-M; M-9-14 through M-9-20 1 Repository: Tennessee State Library and Archives, 403 Seventh Avenue North, Nashville, Tennessee, 37243-0312 Administrative/Biographical History McKenzie and Sons was a surveying and title firm formed in Chattanooga, Tennessee, in 1903. Alexander Ross McKenzie Sr. was born on March 25, 1856, in Switzerland County, Indiana, to John and Jane McKenzie. He moved to Ohio where he met and married Sarah Ann “Annie” Snyder in 1879. While still in Ohio, the couple had two sons, John Herbert and Alexander Ross Jr., born in 1880 and 1882, respectively. Employed as both an engineer and title attorney, A. R. moved to Chattanooga by 1889 to pursue employment in the burgeoning southern industrial center.
    [Show full text]
  • Bjiso Paper 2003
    Park News National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Big South Fork Visitor Guide The official newspaper of Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area 2003 and Obed Wild and Scenic River Inside Special Events page 2 More Interpretive Programs page 2 Welcome Message page 3 Make Your First Stop Here page 3 Emergency Numbers page 3 Campground Reservations page 4 Bandy Creek Campground Map page 4 General Information page 5 Eastern National page 5 Hunting Seasons page 5 Spring Planting Day page 6 Astronomy Programs page 6 Storytelling Festival page 6 White Water-River Dance page 7 Simply Di-Vine page 8 Leave Nothing but Hoofprints page 8 Mountain Biking Growing page 9 Burnt Mill Bridge is Closed page 9 Big South Fork Coal/Great Lakes Lumber page 10 Kentucky Cumberland Corridor page 10 Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species page 11 Big South Fork Scenic Railway page 11 Historic Rugby page 12 Friends of the Big South Fork page 12 Obed Wild and Scenic River pages O1-O4 Big South Fork Guide - 2003 -1 2003 SPECIAL EVENTS AND PROGRAM CALENDAR ON THE COVER April 12- Spring Planting Day- 10:00 a.m. until October 4 - Astronomy - Bandy Creek - Paul Photos of Angel Falls Overlook, Mountain Laurel in 5:00 p.m. Join in a celebration of spring from the late Lewis from the University of Tennessee. bloom and Needle Arch. 1800's through the early 1900's. Demonstrations throughout the day of horse and mule drawn equip- October Saturdays – Cumberland Heritage ment, plowing, planting, dulcimer music, farm Month – Join in a day of cultural heritage activities at PARKS ON THE INTERNET animals and tasks of the homemaker.
    [Show full text]
  • Intervention Request Filed on Behalf of National Coal
    !.Frost-n ill6wn ioddLLC RECEIVED i\ I 1 0 tt · ~ l ·1 S APR 14 2011 Keeana Sajadi Boarman Attorney at Law 859.244.7553 (t) OSM KNOXVI LLE-. 859.231.0011 (f) FIELD OFFICE [email protected] April 13, 2011 VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY SERVICE and ELECTRONIC MAIL Earl D. Bandy, Jr. Field Office Director Office of Surface Mining John J. Duncan Federal Building 710 Locust Street, Second Floor Knoxville, TN 3 7902 Re: Notice of Intervention in Opposition to the State of Tennessee's Petition Dear Mr. Bandy: Please find enclosed a Notice of Intervention on behalf of National Coal, LLC, in opposition to the State of Tennessee's Petition to Designate Certain Lands in Tennessee as Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations. Should you have any questions or need anything further from me, please do not hesitate to ~ontact me. Sincerely, ~ Keeana Sajadi Boannan KSB/jnj Enclosures LEXLibrary 454 61 Ov I 250 West Main Street I Suite 2800 I Lexington, Kentucky 40507-1749 I 859.231.0000 I frostbrowntodd.com Offices in Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee and West Virginia THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT KNOXVILLE FIELD OFFICE In re Designation of Certain Lands ) Within the North Cumberland ) RECEIVEC Wildlife Management Area and the ) Emory River Tracts Conservation ) APR 14 2011 Easement, Anderson, Campbell, Morgan ) and Scott Counties, Tennessee as ) OSM KNOXVILLE Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining ) F.IELD OFFICE Operations ) NOTICE OF INTERVENTION IN OPPOSITION TO THE STATE OF TENNESSEE'S PETITION Pursuant to 30 C.F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document, Big South Fork National River and Recreation
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area Kentucky and Tennessee October 2017 Foundation Document Whitley City to Somerset 31mi 50km MONTICELLO 90 r e iv R d n la 92 er b Lake Cumbe m rla Cu n d 167 k oad or ek R F Cre Freedom g th i 90 u Chapel B So e tl it L Little South Fork from B ig Ky. 92 to Freedom Chapel e Tra is a Kentucky Wild River we ce Nation lto al C She R r e ee cr k ea il Yahoo Falls tion Tra Y Overlook aho o Stearns Ranger Station Yahoo U.S. Forest Service C r Falls e e k Alum Ford 27 Boat launch 700 7mi 92 MARSHES SIDING L ick Yamacraw Bridge Creek WHITLEY HILL TOP CITY DANIEL BOONE NATIONAL FOREST 1651 5mi U 1363 WHITE OAK ck JUNCTION Ro Creek 92 B STEARNS e 791 SMITH TOWN e Worley c h A Stearns Depot Visitor Center G y r a Rail excursions to Blue Heron leave from Stearns o Sou lw v ig t ai Depot (mid-April through November) CO-OPERATIVE e B h ic R r n ve Fork Sce Ri rland REVELO be 1363 m Rock Creek from the u E R Blue Heron C Tennessee-Kentucky line o Ro Whitley City to 75 to White Oak Junction is a aring a Kentucky Wild River d Devil’s 26mi k P r a 42km o u 167 F Jump n ch 742 k 1651 e Overlook e r Bell Farm T C 92 BELL FARM Devil’s Jump h Horse Camp Hazardous rapids Cre t Blue Heron Mining Community ek ou S Outdoor Museum Gorge k oc R Overlook A PINE KNOT MT.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Paddling in the Big South Fork Oneida, Tennessee 37841
    National Park Service National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Department of the Interior Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area Oneida, Tennessee Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area 4564 Leatherwood Road A Guide To Paddling in the Big South Fork Oneida, Tennessee 37841 EXPERIENCE YOUR AMERICA Paddling the Big South Fork Floating the streams of the Big South Fork will give you entry to a land that time and Emergency Information events have visited, impacted and left. Al- though you can still see the results of previous agricultural, mining and logging practices, the The Big South Fork of the Cumberland River Be prepared for self-rescue. Sections of the land today has a quality of wildness with and its main tributaries, the Clear Fork, North river are very remote and help from others limited access and sparse development. At no White Oak and New River offer a variety of could take several hours. Do not over esti- time is this more apparent than when floating whitewater paddling experiences. Some mate your skill level. the streams or camping on a river bank as the stretches are ideal for beginners, while other sun sinks behind the gorge rim. sections should be attempted only by highly Beginner: A person without knowledge of skilled paddlers. Some streams can be floated basic strokes and maneuvers. Where the stream flows slow and smooth, you during any season of the year while others are able to look closely at the banks and cliffs. have enough water for boating only during Novice: A person with knowledge of basic Where the stream speeds up and twists and seasons with sufficient rainfall.
    [Show full text]
  • 16748289.Pdf
    Table of Contents Your All Season Guide to Big South Fork Country...The Trail Riding Capital of the East Trail All Season Guide to Big South Fork Country...The Your Trail Riding & Horse Tales Trails in the Big South Fork Region...4-5 Trail Tales...50 Maps Big South Fork Map & Horse Camps...28-29 Dale Hollow Lake...38 Historical Sites & Parks Historic Rugby...24-25 Festivals & Events Annual Events...22-23 McCreary County Events...27 Friends of Big South Fork (NRRA) Events...31 Articles & Activities Spotlight on Tennessee Recreational Properties...8 Accommodations...10 Kicking Back Cabin at Spruce Creek...11 Spotlight on Muddy Pond...13 Big South Fork Cuisine at Bacara’s...17 Annie’s Travels & Treasures...18-20 Big South Fork ATV Adventures...21 Big South Fork Scenic Railway...26 Big South Fork Discovery Center...33 Spotlight on Long Branch Lakes...35 Dale Hollow Lake...37 Chestnut Hill Winery...39 Cumberland County Playhouse...41 Adventures in Big South Fork...42 Plateau Drug Center...46 Custom Fireplaces & More...47 Photo Contest...51-52 Loree Guest Ranch...56 Lodging ! Camping...9 Accommodations...10 Business Directories Visitor Centers & Chambers...2 Advertiser Directory & Wi-Fi Locations...3 Real Estate, Construction & Support Services...43 Newcomer Information...48-49 Business Directory...53-55 www.VisitTheCumberlandPlateau.com F R To request your & & 2009 D"- & HOLLO W L", & V*4*5034' G6*%& FREE Dale Hollow :0631L"$&'03 Lake Visitor’s Guide- (&T5*/(" 8 "Y"/%)"V*/('6/ W"5&3410R540'"--,*/%4 Toll Free 1-866-INFO )034&#"$,3*%*/( DHL
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Fishes and Changes in Biotic Integrity in the New River, Tennessee
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-1998 Distribution of Fishes and Changes in Biotic Integrity in the New River, Tennessee R. Brian Evans University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Evans, R. Brian, "Distribution of Fishes and Changes in Biotic Integrity in the New River, Tennessee. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1998. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2585 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by R. Brian Evans entitled "Distribution of Fishes and Changes in Biotic Integrity in the New River, Tennessee." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Animal Science. David A. Etnier, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Dewey Bunting, Richard Strange Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by R. Brian Evans entitled "Distribution of Fishes and Changes in Biotic Integrity in the New River, Tennessee." I have examined the final copy of this thesis fo r fo rm and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements fo r the degree ofMaster of Science, with a major in Zoology.
    [Show full text]
  • Alluvial Bars of the Obed Wild and Scenic River, Tennessee
    Alluvial bars make up only a small part of the land surface in the Plateau gorges, but they support a disproportionately large number of RTE plants. For example, Schmalzer and others (1985) reported 9 of 16 (56 percent) RTE plant species growing in the Obed WSR on alluvial bars. Bailey and Coe (2001) reported that six of Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service eight RTE plant species (75 percent) found along the Clear Fork and New River branches of the Big South Fork of the Cumberland River Alluvial Bars of the Obed Wild and in Tennessee grow exclusively on alluvial bars. Despite the impor- tance of alluvial bars as plant habitat, few scientific studies have Scenic River, Tennessee focused on their geographic and physical characteristics or the role of hydrology in forming and maintaining these features in the Obed By W.J. Wolfe, K.C. Fitch,1 and D.E. Ladd WSR and other Cumberland Plateau gorges. The river gorges of the Cumberland Plateau are notable for Introduction their biological diversity. The upland surface of the Plateau, sand- stone cliffs, forested hillslopes, and whitewater river channels In 2004, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the National provide diverse habitats that support a wide variety of plants and Park Service (NPS) initiated a reconnaissance study of alluvial bars animals, including many listed as rare, threatened, or endangered along the Obed WSR, in Cumberland and Morgan Counties, Tennes- (RTE) by State or Federal government agencies (Schmalzer and see (fig. 1). The study was partly driven by concern that trapping of others, 1985; Rouse, 1986; Schmalzer, 1989; Bailey and Coe, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • South Fork Cumberland River Watershed (05130104) of the Cumberland River Basin
    SOUTH FORK CUMBERLAND RIVER WATERSHED (05130104) OF THE CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT SECTION Presented to the people of the South Fork Cumberland River Watershed by the Division of Water Pollution Control October 4, 2007. Prepared by the Knoxville Environmental Field Office: Michael Atchley Steve Brooks Jonathon Burr Larry Everett Rich Stallard The Cookeville Environmental Field Office And the Nashville Central Office, Watershed Management Section: Richard Cochran David Duhl Regan McGahen Josh Upham Jennifer Watson Sherry Wang, Manager SOUTH FORK CUMBERLAND RIVER WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary Summary Chapter 1. Watershed Approach to Water Quality Chapter 2. Description of the South Fork Cumberland River Watershed Chapter 3. Water Quality Assessment of the South Fork Cumberland River Watershed Chapter 4. Point and Nonpoint Source Characterization of the South Fork Cumberland River Watershed Chapter 5. Water Quality Partnerships in the South Fork Cumberland River Watershed Chapter 6. Restoration Strategies Appendix I Appendix II Appendix III Appendix IV Appendix V Glossary GLOSSARY 1Q20. The lowest average 1 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 20 years. 30Q2. The lowest average 3 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 2 years. 7Q10. The lowest average 7 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 10 years. 303(d). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires a listing by states, territories, and authorized tribes of impaired waters, which do not meet the water quality standards that states, territories, and authorized tribes have set for them, even after point sources of pollution have installed the minimum required levels of pollution control technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Freshwater Mussels in the Coal Mining Basin of the New River
    Malacological Review, 2017, 45/46: 165-191 STATUS OF FRESHWATER MUSSELS IN THE COAL MINING BASIN OF THE NEW RIVER (BIG SOUTH FORK CUMBERLAND RIVER DRAINAGE) IN PORTIONS OF SCOTT, ANDERSON, MORGAN AND CAMPBELL COUNTY, TENNESSEE (2006-2008) Steven A. Ahlstedt1, Craig Walker2 and Steve Bakaletz3 ABSTRACT This study presents the results of a freshwater mussel survey of the New River basin, Tennessee (Big South Fork Cumberland River drainage) from 2006-2008. Historically, mussels are reported from the drainage in 1924, and 1938-1939. The 1938-1939 sampling years consisted of an intensive chemical and biological study of the drainage assessing coal mining wastes entering the river from deep mine portals. This represents the only information on what pre-existing conditions were prior to strip-mining that fol- lowed World War II. Thirteen mussel species are documented from the drainage (nine pre-1940 and four are new distribution records). New mussel distributions were found in Buffalo, Brimstone, and Smith Creeks including live federally listed Alasmidonta atropurpurea present in Buffalo Creek. A new drainage record for a rare previously unrecognized mussel, Anodontoides denigrada, occurs in Buffalo and Smith Creeks. Mussels in the drainage are rare and exist in isolated pockets separated by past and present resource extrac- tion. Mussels measured consisted of larger individuals, indications of limited reproduction and recruitment. Naturally occurring environmental conditions (i.e., stream gradient, seasonal low flows, and low calcium levels) may account for low mussel diversity, but biological communities and water quality was severely impaired prior to 1940 and the only identified perturbation was coal mining wastes.
    [Show full text]