DOCSLIB.ORG

125 Pitt Street, C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
125 Pitt Street, C No. 125 Pitt Street, c. 1895-1900 Mount Pleasant, SC No. 125 Pitt Street was most likely constructed c.1895-1900 as either a place of business for widow and seam- stress Eliza L. Owens (1842-1929), or as a small grocery. The building was originally constructed as three-bay wide, single-story rectangular structure. A single-bay, full-length addition was added to the south side as early as 1912, and a recessed, single-bay addition was added to the north side between 1939 and 1949. The infrastructure for the building’s original large storefront windows, front door with transom and small, square fenestration at the side elevations are intact. The large storefront windows and small, elevated side fenestration (which allowed for shelf space inside), as well as the high ceiling and exterior parapet, are representative of groceries at this time and survive at No. 121 Pitt Street, which was constructed between 1893 and 1912 as a grocery. (Figure 1) After 1959, the front windows and primary entry were diminished and side fenestration covered by an exterior brick veneer. By the 1980s, the building was renovated into a residential rental property but was converted back to commercial by the mid 1990s. Figure 1: (left) east (primary) elevation of No. 125 Pitt Street. A similar parapet is present on No. 121 Pitt Street; (center) interior looking northwest from primary entry. Original windows present within infrastructure; (right) original infrastructure of large storefront windows and entry transom intact, now in-filled with brick and plywood. Photos taken by BVL HPR. HISTORIC TIMELINE: 1883: Eliza L. Thomlinson Owens (1842-1929) bought the land now occupied by No. 123-125 Pitt Street (mea- suring 200’ x 52’) from Mary C. Thomlinson for $150.1 At the time of her purchase, the property was empty. Owens and Thomlinson were most likely related, as historic records confirm that Owens had a younger sister and sister-in-law named Mary Thomlinson.2 Owens, age 41 at the time of her purchase and a native of downtown Charleston, was recorded as resid- ing in Mount Pleasant as early as 1880 with her husband James B. Owens (1835-1895, a bookkeeper who, according to Columbia’s State, “surrendered with Lee at Appomattox” during the Civil War) and Ellen Marshall, their family cook. 3 Owens and her husband most likely pur- chased the property as an investment.4 By this time, Pitt Street between Morrison and Venning Streets had not yet been established as a main commercial thoroughfare. This is evidenced by an 1893 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, which depicts only two small stores in this area of Pitt Street and most of the land within today’s busi- ness district void of structures, including the land now occu- pied by No. 125 Pitt Street (Figure 2). 1895: At his death, James B. Owens was described as having “sev- Figure 2: 1893 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map of Mount Pleasant; the property of No. 123-125 Pitt Street is eral positions of prominence in local commercial circles,” highlighted. further suggesting that he and Owens purchased the empty property as an investment.5 No. 123-125 Pitt Street was most likely constructed by Owens after the death of her husband. 1900: The 1900 U.S. Federal Census recorded widow and dressmaker “Eliza L. Owens” as residing at and owning “156 Pitt Street,” which was listed a few doors below Venning Street.6 As the land now occupied by No. 123-125 Pitt Street was the only property Owens purchased in her lifetime, this confirms that a dwelling existed on Owen’s Pitt Street property by this time. Furthermore, many architectural elements of No. 123 Pitt Street indicate a late nineteenth, early twentieth century construction date. The dwelling’s size, symmetry, dual front gables, originally full-width, one-story porch and the porch’s thin columns are representative of the Folk Victorian architectural style, popular in the United States between the 1880s and 1900s. Owens is also listed with five other relatives, two of whom were recorded as seamstresses. As a widow and dressmaker, it is possible that Owens operated a dressmaking business, constructing a small wooden structure on her property adjacent to her dwelling on the main street to house her service. It is also possi- ble, however, that Owens constructed the small wooden building as a rental property for a local grocer, as both the size and fenestration are identical to that of No. 121 Pitt Street, denoted in 1912 as a vegetable 1 Charleston County Register of Deeds, Deed Book B20, Page 87, Charleston, SC. 2 “Joseph Thomlinson,” 1850 U.S. Federal Census, Charleston County Public Library, Charleston, SC; Joseph Thomlinson and Annie Lawrence were the parents of Eliza L. Thomlinson Owens; “Robert Thomlinson,” 1880 U.S. Federal Census, Charleston County Public Library, Charleston, SC; According to the 1850 U.S. Federal Census, Robert was Eliza’s brother. 3 “Mrs. John Moroso Died Last Night,” 1926 December 14, State, Columbia, SC. 4 1880 US Federal Census, Charleston County Public Library, Charleston, SC. 5 “Mr. Owens Dead,” 1895 December 12, Evening Post, Charleston, SC. 6 1900 U.S. Federal Census, Charleston County Public Library, Charleston, SC. store. Similar features include the small, rectangular footprint, large storefront windows and small square side fenestration now covered by the brick veneer. 1910: Owens, in her sixties, moved to Middle Street, most likely closing her business on Pitt Street.7 1912: The building first appears on a map of the area and is record- ed as a vacant one-story, wooden store with an east addition occupied by a cobbler (Figure 3). 1925: Owens sold No. 123-125 Pitt Street to Sarah Elma Coward McKnight (1901-1933) for $2,100.8 The property was one of five properties McKnight and her husband purchased that year, three of which were located in Old Village. No. 123- 125 Pitt Street, as well as the other Old Village properties, were purchased with money made from an illegal moonshine empire created by McKnight’s husband and brother-in-law. At the time of her purchase, McKnight was residing on a Figure 3: 1912 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map of Mount farm in Moncks Corner with her husband James “Sammie” Pleasant; the property of No. 123-125 Pitt Street is Samuel McKnight (1891-1926).9 With his brother Glennie, highlighted. Sammie was a successful corn farmer, lumber merchant and nationally-known moonshiner during the Prohibition era. According to the Charleston Daily Mail at this time, “McKnights corn’ was known far and wide,” which led to Sammie’s frequent arrests throughout the 1920s.10 For example, in 1921 the United States government confiscated his motorboat “ELMA,” named for his wife, and arrested him for the illegal transportation of significant amounts of corn whiskey.11 Sam- mie and his brother have often been linked to Al Capone, as many secondary resources claim Capone’s illegal whiskey imports into Chicago were “McKnight corn” from Hell Hole Swamp.12 According to former mayor of Mount Pleasant Francis Ferguson Coleman in an interview with the Charleston Magazine in 1985, “in the 1920s and 30s, Mount Pleasant was strictly a farming community” with scattered grocery stores. It is likely that McKnight and her husband used real estate as a safe way to invest and secure their illegal funds, purchasing No. 123-125 Pitt Street strictly as rental property.13 It is also possible, however, that McKnight used No. 125 Pitt Street as a store, as many of his business partners in Hell Hole Swamp operated “mercantile stores” elsewhere.14 1926: Sammie was murdered during a gunfight in Moncks Corner.15 The News & Courier reported that the shoot- ing resulted from “a raid by prohibition officers…in the Hell-Hole Swamp section of Berkeley County” where ten stills, 10,000 gallons of beer and 1,800 gallons of corn whiskey “were destroyed.” The area quickly became known as “Bloody Berkeley” nationwide, as Sammie’s murder was one of many that year 7 1910 U.S. Federal Census, Charleston County Public Library, Charleston, SC. 8 Charleston County Register of Deeds, Deed Book U32, Page 510, Charleston, SC. 9 1920 U.S. Federal Census, Charleston County Public Library, Charleston, SC. 10 “Hell Hole - Moonshine and Sunlight,” 1930 February 16, Charleston Daily Mail, Charleston, SC; “Held on Whiskey Charge,” 1921 October 22, News & Courier, Charleston, SC. 11 “United States Marshal’s Sale,” 1921 June 4, Evening Post, Charleston, SC. 12 Parker, Katherine G., “Shining in the Tar Woods: An Examination of Illicit Liquor Distillation Sites in the Francis Marion National Forest,” unpublished paper, Society for Historical Archaeology Conference on Historical and Underwater Archaeology, 2018 January, New Orleans, LA; Miles, Suzannah Smith, “Moonshine Over Hell Hole Swamp,” 2015 December, Charleston Magazine, Charleston, SC. 13 Coskrey, Bob, “The Village,” 1985 August 28, Charleston Magazine, Charleston, SC. 14 Miles, Suzannah Smith, “Moonshine Over Hell Hole Swamp,” 2015 December, Charleston Magazine, Charleston, SC. 15 “Two Killed, One Wounded in Gun Fight,” 1926 May 9, News & Courier, Charleston, SC. related to bootlegging in and around Moncks Corner.16 No. 125 Pitt Street continued to be used as a rental property. 1933: McKnight remarried to Aldrin Q. Murden and sold No. 123-125 Pitt Street to downtown resident Erna Louise Fischer Heffron (1895-1954) for $200.17 Heffron owned many pieces of land throughout Charleston and also most likely used No. 125 Pitt Street as a rental. During her ownership of the property, she resided on Rutledge Avenue downtown.18 1936: Heffron sold No. 123-125 Pitt Street to William Samuel Royall (1904-1990) and his sister Nan V.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Establishing the Francis Marion
    How the Weeks Act benefited the lowcountry of South Carolina is a tale with a twist. Lumber companies were cooperating with the Forest Service on fire control and other issues two decades before the federal government purchased its first acre of land under the Weeks Act. Not surprisingly, when it came time to buy land, the Forest Service turned to those same companies first. Establishing the Francis Marion NATIONAL FOREST HISTORY IN SOUTH CAROLINA’S LOWCOUNTRY, 1901–1936 t the end of the nineteenth century, the center of lumber production was shifting from the Northeast and the Great Lakes states to the vast southern Apine belt that stretched in a crescent from Virginia to Texas. The big indus- trial timber corporations had begun running out of merchantable timber in the North and turned to areas with seemingly inexhaustible Atlantic Coast Lumber was considered one of the largest pro- lumber resources, the Pacific Northwest and the South.1 ducers on the eastern seaboard.2 Though logging and lumber milling had occurred in South When timber companies left the Great Lakes states, they left Carolina throughout the nineteenth century, the turn of the behind hundreds of thousands of acres of depleted lands, almost twentieth century marked the commencement of large-scale completely denuded of timber. Implicit in the growth of the industrial logging in the coastal plain pine belt. Funded by north- South Carolina lumber companies was the possibility that the ern capital, the Atlantic Coast Lumber Corporation, the E. P. same cycle would be repeated. However, the U.S. Bureau of Burton Lumber Company, the A.
    [Show full text]
  • Francis Marion Plan FEIS Chapters 1 to 4
    In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility Lisa Briggitte Randle University of South Carolina
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2018 East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility Lisa Briggitte Randle University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Randle, L.(2018). East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/4962 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility By Lisa Briggitte Randle Bachelor of Arts University of South Carolina, 1979 Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 1990 Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 2009 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2018 Accepted by: Kenneth G. Kelly, Major Professor Leland Ferguson, Committee Member Michael E. Hodgson, Committee Member Kimberly Simmons, Committee Member Terrance Weik, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Lisa Briggitte Randle, 2018 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION I am honored to dedicate this dissertation to my friend and mentor, Dr. Leland G. Ferguson, for initiating the East Branch of the Cooper River Project and for his wise words of support when the completion of this dissertation seemed overwhelming. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the financial support of the University of South Carolina’s African American Professorial Program, the Anthropology Department’s Dorothy O’Dell Travel Grant, and a grant from the Archaeological Society of South Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Public Comments
    Draft Revised Land Management Plan Francis Marion National Forest Berkeley County, South Carolina Charleston County, South Carolina Summary of Public Comments August 2016 Introduction The Francis Marion National Forest (Francis Marion or Forest) released the “Draft Revised Land Management Plan for the Francis Marion National Forest and Associated Draft Environmental Impact Statement” on August 14, 2015 to begin the official 90-day comment period. The comment period ended on November 12, 2015. The Francis Marion received a total of 37 comment letters and emails on the draft land management plan (draft plan) and associated draft environmental impact statement (DEIS). No form letters were received. Letters and emails were received from individuals, groups, organizations, agencies, and business owners. Letters and emails were either delivered by the U.S. Post Office, submitted by email, or directly entered through the Comment Analysis and Response Application (CARA) input form by the commenter. Most comments received were entered directly by comments, but letters and emails that were submitted were entered by Forest Service staff into the CARA input form for a complete record. Reports generated by CARA on the coding structure and coded comments are attached All of the comment letters and emails were analyzed using a process called content analysis, which was completed by Forest Service personnel and contractors (see Appendix A in this Content Analysis Report). Of the 37 comment letters that contained unique and substantially different comments, comments that were coded, analyzed, addressed, and entered into CARA and then associated with one of the 153ed Public Concern statements (PCs). Then the IDT then developed responses to each of the PCs.
    [Show full text]
  • Caroliniana Society Annual Gifts Report - April 2012 University Libraries--University of South Carolina
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons University South Caroliniana Society - Annual South Caroliniana Library Report of Gifts 4-2012 Caroliniana Society Annual Gifts Report - April 2012 University Libraries--University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/scs_anpgm Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation University of South Carolina, "University of South Carolina Libraries - Caroliniana Society Annual Gifts Report, April 2012". http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/scs_anpgm/3/ This Newsletter is brought to you by the South Caroliniana Library at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in University South Caroliniana Society - Annual Report of Gifts yb an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE UNIVERSITY SOUTH CAROLINIANA SOCIETY SEVENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL MEETING __________ UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA Saturday, April 28, 2012 Mr. Kenneth L. Childs, President, Presiding __________ Reception and Exhibit ..............................................................11:00 a.m. South Caroliniana Library Luncheon.....................................................................................1:00 p.m. The Palmetto Club at The Summit Club Location Business Meeting Welcome Reports of the Executive Council...................... Mr. Kenneth L. Childs Address......................................................................Dr. William A. Link Richard J. Milbauer Chair in History, University
    [Show full text]
  • US Environmental Protection Agency Region 4
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 David Wilson Chief South Carolina Department of Environmental Control Bureau of Water 2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201 SUBJ: Approval of the State of South Carolina's 2008 303( d) List Submittal Dear Mr. Wilson: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 4, has completed its review of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control's Final 2008 Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 303(d) list of water quality limited segments. EPA has determined that each of the water quality limited segments still requiring Total Maximum Daily Loads identified on the State's 2008 list meets the requirements of the CWA Section 303( d) and its implementing regulations, 40 CFR 130.7. EPA hereby approves the State of South Carolina's decision to include each of the waters designated by the State in its 2008 303( d) list. Enclosed for your information is the accompanying decision document for this approval action. Appendix C of the enclosed decision document contains 23 waters of concern for which EPA is not acting on at this time. These waters were submitted based on a preliminary assessment method that has recently been modified in the State's monitoring program so that more representative data can be obtained. Listing determinations for these waters should be included in the 2010 303(d) list submittal. If you have questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at (404) 562-9345 or Annie Godfrey, Chief, East Standards, Monitoring, and TMDL Section at (404) 562-9967.
    [Show full text]
  • Langdon Cheves of Charleston
    METROMONT MATERIALS A name to grow on. You may not recognize the name, source for all your concrete needs­ but actually, we're old friends of prestress, block, ready mix, pipe yours. Because we've been around or whatever. for over a third of a century-as So pass the word. Metromont Greenville and Spartanburg Concrete Materials is getting around. In fact, Companies. But we've been growing we've added a new look and symbol a lot ... so we combined two fine to go along with our new name. But old companies into one and changed basically, we're the same company the name-to Metromont Materials. you've known all along. And you A name to grow on. can count on us to give you that same Try Metromont Materials on service, quality and dependability for size. We think it fits. And we hope that our company was founded on. you'll like it as well as we do. After all, some things never change. Why Metromont Materials? 'I Well, we serve the entire Piedmont­ which has certainly become a fast­ moving metropolitan area-and we METROMONT thought that " Metromont" was a good MATERIALS name for the region-and for us. Greenville Division Then, we added the "Materials" to Box 2486 / Greenvi lle, S.C. 29602 803/269-4664 Spartanburg Division ~mphasize the fact that we're one Box 1292 / Spartanburg, S.C. 29301 803/585-4241 TBE GltEAT C&S EALAHCIHG ACT (\-\((KING J>-((O\JN1 S1 I>-1f.i'.A(N1 PAG< NO S1 A1tfAtN1 OA1< 1 Of 1 A(COUN1 NO .
    [Show full text]
  • State of South Carolina Monitoring Strategy
    STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA MONITORING STRATEGY FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2018 ATER W alth and Environmental Control UREAU OF South Carolina Department of He Department Carolina South B Technical Report No. 0802-17 DISTRIBUTION LIST Mark Hollis, Bureau Chief, Bureau of Water South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201 803-898-4210 [email protected] Jennifer Hughes, Assistant Bureau Chief, Bureau of Water South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201 803-898-1992 [email protected] Renee Shealy, Chief, Bureau of Environmental Health Services South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control EA Laboratories 8231 Parklane Road Columbia, S.C. 29223 803-896-8994 [email protected] Elizabeth Basil, Assistant Bureau Chief, Bureau of Environmental Health Services South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control EA Laboratories 8231 Parklane Road Columbia, S.C. 29223 803-896-8408 [email protected] Sandra Flemming, Assistant Bureau Chief, Bureau of Environmental Health Services, QAM South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control EA Laboratories 8231 Parklane Road Columbia, S.C. 29223 803-896-0901 [email protected] Roger Brewer, Acting Director, Analytical and Radiological Environmental Services Division, Bureau of Environmental Health Services South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control EA Laboratories 8231 Parklane Road Columbia, S.C. 29223 803-896-0856 [email protected] Bureau of
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina
    SOUTH CAROLINA Cheryl Matheny Gloria Burns James G. Titus Andrew Hickok Daniel Hudgens The Likelihood of Shore Protection, Volume 2 February 2010. The following document can be cited as: Matheny, C, G. Burns, J. G. Titus, A. Hickok, and D.E. Hudgens. 2010. “South Carolina”. In James G. Titus, Daniel L Trescott, and Daniel E. Hudgens (editors). The Likelihood of Shore Protection along the Atlantic Coast of the United States. Volume 2: New England and the Southeast. Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. The opinions expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official opinion of the Environmental Protection Agency. The primary referring page for this document is http://risingsea.net/ERL/SC.html Chapter 3: SOUTH CAROLINA Prepared by: Cheryl Matheny* Gloria Burns* James G. Titus** Andrew Hickok** Daniel Hudgens** Photos by Jim Titus * Matheny and Burns prepared portions of the report through the section on stakeholder review, but were not involved with the final review which substantially changed the results. ** Titus, Hickok, and Hudgens undertook the final review and produced the final report. 115 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 119 METHOD......................................................................................................................................... 123 SOUTH CAROLINA PERSPECTIVES............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE MAGAZINE of SOUTH CAROLINA San Er~ One Dollar Twenty-Five MAY• 1973 There Are Any Number of Good Reasons Why Your Next Building Should Be of Prestressed
    THE MAGAZINE OF SOUTH CAROLINA san er~ One Dollar Twenty-Five MAY• 1973 There are any number of good reasons why your next building should be of prestressed. Here are four of them. Here at Metromont, we feel that a building should And does it all , too. Like giving you maximum say something about the company it represents. return on your dollar investment. With minimum And if you 're currently planning a new maintenance and low insurance rates. Plus building, you ought to be considering what it a lot more we 'd like to tell you about. should say about your company. And about you. So if you 're thinking about a new building, Prestressed says something solid. Sure. let Metromont share in your plans for the And lasting. That you think and plan ahead in future. We know that when it comes t o concrete terms. That you have an eye la6CT'i ,,. ,,. building materials, beauty is as beauty for beauty as well as for business. In 1r1~ ,71~Mt/NT does. short. prestressed says it all. A'/ATEHIALS And prestressed does a lot! Greenville Division / Box 2486 / Greenville. SC 29602 803/269-4664 Spartanburg Division / Box 1292 / Spartanburg, S.C. 29301 803/585-424 1 .. Campfires & Sandcastles start with C&S Whatever your vacation dreams -camping in the mountains, fishing at the lake, or soaking up sun at the beach-C&S Bank can start you on your way. We'll make you a low cost loan for that new camper. Or the boat you've been promising your family.
    [Show full text]
  • 1995 Colleton County, South Carolina Table of Contents
    Colleton County 1-listorical and Architectural Inventory 1992- 1995 Final Survey Report August 1 f195 The Jaeger Company 119 Washington Street Gainesville, Georgia 30501 Colleton County Historical and Architectural Inventory, 1992 - 1995 Colleton County, South Carolina Final Survey Report Walterboro-Colleton Chamber of Commerce Walterboro, South Carolina Palmetto Conservation Foundation Columbia, South Carolina U!(:T()Pl.(' tl l v \)I\�U if\ '0 ;-..... cr1,--..� ,__ ,, - The Jaeger Company Pnr<·r-n•'.t \ L.,. ' i ...L ,., \ \/ -, i"'..·. ·-r-1nr·1 I\ .i: "--·11'' • � \j i ! ',J Gainesville, Georgia Historic Preservation, Landscape Architecture, Environmental Assessment, Planning The activity that is the subject of this reporthas been financedin partwith Federalfunds from theNational Par!( Service, Department of the Interior, and administered by the South Carolina Department of Archives and History. However, thecontents and opinions do not necessarilyreflect theviews or policies of the Departmentof theInterior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercialproducts constitute endorsement or recommendations by the Department of the Interior. Vtle Yiand AgeDiscrimination This program receives Federal financialassistance tor identification and protection of historicproperties. Under TIiie VI of the CivilRights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the RehabilitationAct of 1973, the U.S. Department of the Interiorprohibits discriminationon the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicap in its federallyassisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facilityas described above, or if you desire furtherinformation, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. In additionto theabove, the consultant agrees to complywith theAge DiscriminationAct of 1975, 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenic Byways
    n c s c e n i c b y w a y s a h c rol rt in o a n fourth edition s c s en ay ic byw North Carolina Department of Transportation Table of ConTenTs Click on Byway. Introduction Legend NCDOT Programs Rules of the Road Cultural Resources Blue Ridge Parkway Scenic Byways State Map MOuntains Waterfall Byway Nantahala Byway Cherohala Skyway Indian Lakes Scenic Byway Whitewater Way Forest Heritage Scenic Byway appalachian Medley French Broad Overview Historic Flat Rock Scenic Byway Drovers Road Black Mountain Rag Pacolet River Byway South Mountain Scenery Mission Crossing Little Parkway New River Valley Byway I-26 Scenic Highway u.S. 421 Scenic Byway Pisgah Loop Scenic Byway upper Yadkin Way Yadkin Valley Scenic Byway Smoky Mountain Scenic Byway Mt. Mitchell Scenic Drive PIedmont Hanging Rock Scenic Byway Colonial Heritage Byway Football Road Crowders Mountain Drive Mill Bridge Scenic Byway 2 BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS BACK TO BYWAYS MAP Table of ConTenTs uwharrie Scenic Road Rolling Kansas Byway Pee Dee Valley Drive Grassy Island Crossing Sandhills Scenic Drive Birkhead Wilderness Route Flint Hill Ramble Indian Heritage Trail Pottery Road Devil’s Stompin’ Ground Road North Durham Country Byway averasboro Battlefield Scenic Byway Clayton Bypass Scenic Byway Scots-Welsh Heritage Byway COastaL PLain Blue-Gray Scenic Byway Meteor Lakes Byway Green Swamp Byway Brunswick Town Road Cape Fear Historic Byway Lafayette’s Tour Tar Heel Trace edenton-Windsor Loop Perquimans Crossing Pamlico Scenic Byway alligator River Route Roanoke Voyages Corridor Outer Banks Scenic Byway State Parks & Recreation areas Historic Sites For More Information Bibliography 3 BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS BACK TO BYWAYS MAP inTroduction The N.C.
    [Show full text]