DOCSLIB.ORG

Indictments Returned on Drug Law Charges

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indictments Returned on Drug Law Charges THE FOR*AH COMPAHY KONUOUTH, ILL. 61462 What Do You Do With An 8-Year-Old Law Breaker ? Editorial Correspondence S. Hunter. Rev. A. J. Jenkins and Although the 13-year-old was juvenile probation officers to work The judge ordered that the boys, society s safety, few meaningful By TOM DAVIS Rev: W. A. Johnson. 'jailed three weeks ago, his parents with these youngsters and no long haired, get hair cuts, attend options face a jurist sentencing Creation of a type oi juvenile had never visited the boy in jail. provisions for fOB tor home care in school and work if they could find Georgetown County youth. the jurist referred the criminal court system in Georgetown Judge Kpps was told. event the children lack suitable jobs. If you were a judge in the "big indictments to the Probate Judge County was strongly urged by homelile or parental guidance. court-' of Georgetown County, of Georgetown County, who by law 'They're so small. I don't know He suggested to parents that Judge Frank Epps in the Court of what would you do with an eight- can handle juvenile cases. He also what to do with them.'' Kpps ob­ In referring juvenile cases to the I inner discipline and greater General Sessions Tuesday after year-old boy charged with urged the Georgetown County served. He finally ordered they be Probate Judge and requesting the supervision at home could help *epeatedly confronting the housebreaking, larceny and Welfare Department to im­ sent to the state evaluation center Georgetown County Welfare keep the youngsters from reap­ problem of what to do with juvenile receiving stolen goods? mediately check on parents of the lor 45 days for study and coun­ Department to investigate home pearing again the the county's high offenders. young juveniles to see if parental seling. hie and prepare a case study, Jude criminal court. Send him to the county gang, the The problem surfaced with two responsibility had been violated. A family-juvenile court system is Kpps appeared to be tilling a Two other teenagers, both age 15, state pen, a state industrial school, little boys nine and eight years old, NO parent accompanied the badly needed to cope with such critical court gap in Georgetown were sentenced for shoplifting. A a fledgling juvenile rehabilitation who broke into Bynum Elementary youngsters to court. cases in Georgetown County. Jude County by marshalling the only 14-year-old pleaded guilty to center? School scarcely big enough to see Kpps said, noting that the high governmental services available shoplifting. A 16-year-old girl got a If you are a judge and you care, over the top of a desk. The juvenile The same situation arose with a criminal court is not the place to on a local level. suspended sentence, also for you have precious few options. offenders were so young there is no i:i and 14-year-old boy. who broke try such cases. shoplifting. Georgetown County is charging ,^tate institution to commit them to, into the First Baptist Church and Georgetown County not only Another case involving boys 14, Other juvenile cases, involving at a pace that almost baffles the Judge Epps noted. stole $«0. One of the youths also lacked a juvenile court system, it IS and 1(1. who stole a hog and boys 17 and 18 years old, arose imagination. Our county needed a Judge Epps turned the was charged with breaking into the has no facilities for detailing young .barbecued it, also touched on the from narcotic violations. juvenile court structure a decade youngsters over to a group of Pittsburgh Paint Store on Church lawbreakers except to place them same problem. A three year As Judge Epps noted, with un­ ago. Ten years ago it was foresight. Negro clergymen attending circuit Street. in the countv jail. There are no suspended sentence was imposed. derstanding but concern for Today it is a necessity. court, Rev. A. W. Holman, Rev. J. $ t&t®tl0ton intrs ESTABLISHED 1797 1 Year In County $4.00 1 Year In State $5.00 Georgetown, S. C. 29440 Thursday, March 22, 1973 Vol. No. 177 - No. 19 „ 1 Year Out of State 16.00 Inlet Dredging Indictments Returned Planned Congressman Ed Young an­ nounced this week that On Drug Law Charges emergency dredging will be done at Murrells Inlet during the month of April that will make the Fifteen indictments for drug channel there navigable during law violations, involving a total of any tide condition. 28 counts of breaking state drug y Work is planned to begin in the laws, have been returned by a first week of April by the Corps of grand jury in the Court of Engineers and it will take ap­ General Sessions. proximately a month to complete A jury acquitted Luke Gamble, the effort that will make it Jr 23. of Georgetown of two possible for the boats operating charges of violating drug laws. there to be able to come in and He -tatd been charged with out during low tide instead of possession of marijuana with having to wait for high tide intent to sell and possession of periods. heroin with intent to sell and COMING ALONG—The new bridge under construction at Browns Ferry is beginning to Young began work in getting distribute. show considerable progress. Piling is in process of being driven at the western bank and a.slp for the Murrells Inlet area Gamble denied selling mari­ work on either approach is being done, L. K. Ambrose, resident bridge engineer with the S. during his campaign for juana or heroin to a Sumter Congress last fall, arranging for C. Highway Department said. The bridge flanking the crossing will replace the old bridge. man who came to Georgetown to a visit to the South Carolina help the Georgetown narcotics coastal area by Undersecretary squad. Gamble also denied any of the Army Kenneth Belieu. involvement with drug traffic. This emergency dredging to be New Bridge Construction Judge Frank Epps of Green­ done in April and a study to ville, in other drug cases, sen­ develop a program that should tenced Tommy Blake, 20 and an provide a permanent solution to 18-year-old boy to five years, the problem there are by­ suspended upon service of one ; products of these efforts. year or payment of a $1,000 fine. '.' • tiVv'«$Kfc Money has been recommended Slated For Pawleys Island A 17-year-old Andrews boy, - • > -. v»t* TS-r. in the president's proposed By ETHI.YN MISSKOON L. Hodges, resident maintenance siderable wear and invasion by- charged with possession of ••* mi ^ • 'vaT^ budget for the coming year for engineer with the Conway office, marine life, still have held up marijuana with intent to ' . L i ' *i ' »'«USL IE*. The usual flood of house-party- in charge ol construction this permanent program study. pretty good' since they have distribute, was first sentenced DIKES A dragline is erecting dikes around a site near the Pee Dee River bridge in ers that converges on Pawleys at Bowles said that Hodges and Meanwhile, the emergency been in use over 25 years. under the Youthful Offender's Georgetown where a shopping center is to be built by the Belser Corporation. Sand will be Easter-time may very well tread his crew of bridge construction dredging will be done by the A basic figure lor the bridge Act not to exceed five years. This dredged from nearby rivers and Winyah Bay and pumped into the site. Corps of Engineers equipment where they never before have men had done several bridges in top components would run sentence was later changed by and personnel. A side-casting trod the county around (10,900, it was estimated the court to five years, suspended dredge, the Merritt, has been The much anticipated bridge The bridges will consist of pre­ and labor plus foundation might upon service of one year or assigned to Murrells Inlet for the improvements to the south and cast concrete sections, 31'j feet hike the cost to around $20,000. payment of a $1 .ooo fine, to match •April dredging. north causeways are due to begin wide, 15-loet long and weighing A problem of the construction the same sentence imposed on a Three Stranded Boaters Corps of Engineer officials say within two weeks. Jack Bowles, several thousand tons per unit. will be disposal of dirt excavated friend ol the boy. for the same that the April date was decided resident engineer with the South Eighteen 35-ft. specially at the new bridge site. offense upon after consultation with Carolina Highway Department's treated piling to give added Bowles said that good dirt The friend, James A. Vasques, Wildlife authorities and land local office said. resistance to weather and water would be used to build up High­ 24, originally from California, people The work will include a new 75- action will be used in the south way 17-A shoulders while till not was discharged from the Navy in Rescued On Pee Dee River "We are pleased that we are foot bridge lor the south causeway bridge. Bowles said. suitable for road work, might be Charleston. He lived in Mc­ Causeway and a KO-foot extension getting some immediate relief The new bridge will be located used to fill nearby areas. Clellanville for a while and then Three Georgetown residents asked the names of the stranded Meanwhile, a 16-foot Thun- ot the existing north causeway and are particularly looking approximately 750 feet east of the Widening ol the causeway with moved to Andrews where he was and their small sons were cast boatmen.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Establishing the Francis Marion
    How the Weeks Act benefited the lowcountry of South Carolina is a tale with a twist. Lumber companies were cooperating with the Forest Service on fire control and other issues two decades before the federal government purchased its first acre of land under the Weeks Act. Not surprisingly, when it came time to buy land, the Forest Service turned to those same companies first. Establishing the Francis Marion NATIONAL FOREST HISTORY IN SOUTH CAROLINA’S LOWCOUNTRY, 1901–1936 t the end of the nineteenth century, the center of lumber production was shifting from the Northeast and the Great Lakes states to the vast southern Apine belt that stretched in a crescent from Virginia to Texas. The big indus- trial timber corporations had begun running out of merchantable timber in the North and turned to areas with seemingly inexhaustible Atlantic Coast Lumber was considered one of the largest pro- lumber resources, the Pacific Northwest and the South.1 ducers on the eastern seaboard.2 Though logging and lumber milling had occurred in South When timber companies left the Great Lakes states, they left Carolina throughout the nineteenth century, the turn of the behind hundreds of thousands of acres of depleted lands, almost twentieth century marked the commencement of large-scale completely denuded of timber. Implicit in the growth of the industrial logging in the coastal plain pine belt. Funded by north- South Carolina lumber companies was the possibility that the ern capital, the Atlantic Coast Lumber Corporation, the E. P. same cycle would be repeated. However, the U.S. Bureau of Burton Lumber Company, the A.
    [Show full text]
  • Francis Marion Plan FEIS Chapters 1 to 4
    In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility Lisa Briggitte Randle University of South Carolina
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2018 East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility Lisa Briggitte Randle University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Randle, L.(2018). East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/4962 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. East Branch of the Cooper River, 1780-1820: Panopticism and Mobility By Lisa Briggitte Randle Bachelor of Arts University of South Carolina, 1979 Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 1990 Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 2009 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2018 Accepted by: Kenneth G. Kelly, Major Professor Leland Ferguson, Committee Member Michael E. Hodgson, Committee Member Kimberly Simmons, Committee Member Terrance Weik, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Lisa Briggitte Randle, 2018 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION I am honored to dedicate this dissertation to my friend and mentor, Dr. Leland G. Ferguson, for initiating the East Branch of the Cooper River Project and for his wise words of support when the completion of this dissertation seemed overwhelming. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the financial support of the University of South Carolina’s African American Professorial Program, the Anthropology Department’s Dorothy O’Dell Travel Grant, and a grant from the Archaeological Society of South Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Public Comments
    Draft Revised Land Management Plan Francis Marion National Forest Berkeley County, South Carolina Charleston County, South Carolina Summary of Public Comments August 2016 Introduction The Francis Marion National Forest (Francis Marion or Forest) released the “Draft Revised Land Management Plan for the Francis Marion National Forest and Associated Draft Environmental Impact Statement” on August 14, 2015 to begin the official 90-day comment period. The comment period ended on November 12, 2015. The Francis Marion received a total of 37 comment letters and emails on the draft land management plan (draft plan) and associated draft environmental impact statement (DEIS). No form letters were received. Letters and emails were received from individuals, groups, organizations, agencies, and business owners. Letters and emails were either delivered by the U.S. Post Office, submitted by email, or directly entered through the Comment Analysis and Response Application (CARA) input form by the commenter. Most comments received were entered directly by comments, but letters and emails that were submitted were entered by Forest Service staff into the CARA input form for a complete record. Reports generated by CARA on the coding structure and coded comments are attached All of the comment letters and emails were analyzed using a process called content analysis, which was completed by Forest Service personnel and contractors (see Appendix A in this Content Analysis Report). Of the 37 comment letters that contained unique and substantially different comments, comments that were coded, analyzed, addressed, and entered into CARA and then associated with one of the 153ed Public Concern statements (PCs). Then the IDT then developed responses to each of the PCs.
    [Show full text]
  • Caroliniana Society Annual Gifts Report - April 2012 University Libraries--University of South Carolina
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons University South Caroliniana Society - Annual South Caroliniana Library Report of Gifts 4-2012 Caroliniana Society Annual Gifts Report - April 2012 University Libraries--University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/scs_anpgm Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation University of South Carolina, "University of South Carolina Libraries - Caroliniana Society Annual Gifts Report, April 2012". http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/scs_anpgm/3/ This Newsletter is brought to you by the South Caroliniana Library at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in University South Caroliniana Society - Annual Report of Gifts yb an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE UNIVERSITY SOUTH CAROLINIANA SOCIETY SEVENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL MEETING __________ UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA Saturday, April 28, 2012 Mr. Kenneth L. Childs, President, Presiding __________ Reception and Exhibit ..............................................................11:00 a.m. South Caroliniana Library Luncheon.....................................................................................1:00 p.m. The Palmetto Club at The Summit Club Location Business Meeting Welcome Reports of the Executive Council...................... Mr. Kenneth L. Childs Address......................................................................Dr. William A. Link Richard J. Milbauer Chair in History, University
    [Show full text]
  • US Environmental Protection Agency Region 4
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 David Wilson Chief South Carolina Department of Environmental Control Bureau of Water 2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201 SUBJ: Approval of the State of South Carolina's 2008 303( d) List Submittal Dear Mr. Wilson: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 4, has completed its review of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control's Final 2008 Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 303(d) list of water quality limited segments. EPA has determined that each of the water quality limited segments still requiring Total Maximum Daily Loads identified on the State's 2008 list meets the requirements of the CWA Section 303( d) and its implementing regulations, 40 CFR 130.7. EPA hereby approves the State of South Carolina's decision to include each of the waters designated by the State in its 2008 303( d) list. Enclosed for your information is the accompanying decision document for this approval action. Appendix C of the enclosed decision document contains 23 waters of concern for which EPA is not acting on at this time. These waters were submitted based on a preliminary assessment method that has recently been modified in the State's monitoring program so that more representative data can be obtained. Listing determinations for these waters should be included in the 2010 303(d) list submittal. If you have questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at (404) 562-9345 or Annie Godfrey, Chief, East Standards, Monitoring, and TMDL Section at (404) 562-9967.
    [Show full text]
  • Langdon Cheves of Charleston
    METROMONT MATERIALS A name to grow on. You may not recognize the name, source for all your concrete needs­ but actually, we're old friends of prestress, block, ready mix, pipe yours. Because we've been around or whatever. for over a third of a century-as So pass the word. Metromont Greenville and Spartanburg Concrete Materials is getting around. In fact, Companies. But we've been growing we've added a new look and symbol a lot ... so we combined two fine to go along with our new name. But old companies into one and changed basically, we're the same company the name-to Metromont Materials. you've known all along. And you A name to grow on. can count on us to give you that same Try Metromont Materials on service, quality and dependability for size. We think it fits. And we hope that our company was founded on. you'll like it as well as we do. After all, some things never change. Why Metromont Materials? 'I Well, we serve the entire Piedmont­ which has certainly become a fast­ moving metropolitan area-and we METROMONT thought that " Metromont" was a good MATERIALS name for the region-and for us. Greenville Division Then, we added the "Materials" to Box 2486 / Greenvi lle, S.C. 29602 803/269-4664 Spartanburg Division ~mphasize the fact that we're one Box 1292 / Spartanburg, S.C. 29301 803/585-4241 TBE GltEAT C&S EALAHCIHG ACT (\-\((KING J>-((O\JN1 S1 I>-1f.i'.A(N1 PAG< NO S1 A1tfAtN1 OA1< 1 Of 1 A(COUN1 NO .
    [Show full text]
  • State of South Carolina Monitoring Strategy
    STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA MONITORING STRATEGY FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2018 ATER W alth and Environmental Control UREAU OF South Carolina Department of He Department Carolina South B Technical Report No. 0802-17 DISTRIBUTION LIST Mark Hollis, Bureau Chief, Bureau of Water South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201 803-898-4210 [email protected] Jennifer Hughes, Assistant Bureau Chief, Bureau of Water South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201 803-898-1992 [email protected] Renee Shealy, Chief, Bureau of Environmental Health Services South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control EA Laboratories 8231 Parklane Road Columbia, S.C. 29223 803-896-8994 [email protected] Elizabeth Basil, Assistant Bureau Chief, Bureau of Environmental Health Services South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control EA Laboratories 8231 Parklane Road Columbia, S.C. 29223 803-896-8408 [email protected] Sandra Flemming, Assistant Bureau Chief, Bureau of Environmental Health Services, QAM South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control EA Laboratories 8231 Parklane Road Columbia, S.C. 29223 803-896-0901 [email protected] Roger Brewer, Acting Director, Analytical and Radiological Environmental Services Division, Bureau of Environmental Health Services South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control EA Laboratories 8231 Parklane Road Columbia, S.C. 29223 803-896-0856 [email protected] Bureau of
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina
    SOUTH CAROLINA Cheryl Matheny Gloria Burns James G. Titus Andrew Hickok Daniel Hudgens The Likelihood of Shore Protection, Volume 2 February 2010. The following document can be cited as: Matheny, C, G. Burns, J. G. Titus, A. Hickok, and D.E. Hudgens. 2010. “South Carolina”. In James G. Titus, Daniel L Trescott, and Daniel E. Hudgens (editors). The Likelihood of Shore Protection along the Atlantic Coast of the United States. Volume 2: New England and the Southeast. Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. The opinions expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official opinion of the Environmental Protection Agency. The primary referring page for this document is http://risingsea.net/ERL/SC.html Chapter 3: SOUTH CAROLINA Prepared by: Cheryl Matheny* Gloria Burns* James G. Titus** Andrew Hickok** Daniel Hudgens** Photos by Jim Titus * Matheny and Burns prepared portions of the report through the section on stakeholder review, but were not involved with the final review which substantially changed the results. ** Titus, Hickok, and Hudgens undertook the final review and produced the final report. 115 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 119 METHOD......................................................................................................................................... 123 SOUTH CAROLINA PERSPECTIVES............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE MAGAZINE of SOUTH CAROLINA San Er~ One Dollar Twenty-Five MAY• 1973 There Are Any Number of Good Reasons Why Your Next Building Should Be of Prestressed
    THE MAGAZINE OF SOUTH CAROLINA san er~ One Dollar Twenty-Five MAY• 1973 There are any number of good reasons why your next building should be of prestressed. Here are four of them. Here at Metromont, we feel that a building should And does it all , too. Like giving you maximum say something about the company it represents. return on your dollar investment. With minimum And if you 're currently planning a new maintenance and low insurance rates. Plus building, you ought to be considering what it a lot more we 'd like to tell you about. should say about your company. And about you. So if you 're thinking about a new building, Prestressed says something solid. Sure. let Metromont share in your plans for the And lasting. That you think and plan ahead in future. We know that when it comes t o concrete terms. That you have an eye la6CT'i ,,. ,,. building materials, beauty is as beauty for beauty as well as for business. In 1r1~ ,71~Mt/NT does. short. prestressed says it all. A'/ATEHIALS And prestressed does a lot! Greenville Division / Box 2486 / Greenville. SC 29602 803/269-4664 Spartanburg Division / Box 1292 / Spartanburg, S.C. 29301 803/585-424 1 .. Campfires & Sandcastles start with C&S Whatever your vacation dreams -camping in the mountains, fishing at the lake, or soaking up sun at the beach-C&S Bank can start you on your way. We'll make you a low cost loan for that new camper. Or the boat you've been promising your family.
    [Show full text]
  • 1995 Colleton County, South Carolina Table of Contents
    Colleton County 1-listorical and Architectural Inventory 1992- 1995 Final Survey Report August 1 f195 The Jaeger Company 119 Washington Street Gainesville, Georgia 30501 Colleton County Historical and Architectural Inventory, 1992 - 1995 Colleton County, South Carolina Final Survey Report Walterboro-Colleton Chamber of Commerce Walterboro, South Carolina Palmetto Conservation Foundation Columbia, South Carolina U!(:T()Pl.(' tl l v \)I\�U if\ '0 ;-..... cr1,--..� ,__ ,, - The Jaeger Company Pnr<·r-n•'.t \ L.,. ' i ...L ,., \ \/ -, i"'..·. ·-r-1nr·1 I\ .i: "--·11'' • � \j i ! ',J Gainesville, Georgia Historic Preservation, Landscape Architecture, Environmental Assessment, Planning The activity that is the subject of this reporthas been financedin partwith Federalfunds from theNational Par!( Service, Department of the Interior, and administered by the South Carolina Department of Archives and History. However, thecontents and opinions do not necessarilyreflect theviews or policies of the Departmentof theInterior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercialproducts constitute endorsement or recommendations by the Department of the Interior. Vtle Yiand AgeDiscrimination This program receives Federal financialassistance tor identification and protection of historicproperties. Under TIiie VI of the CivilRights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the RehabilitationAct of 1973, the U.S. Department of the Interiorprohibits discriminationon the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicap in its federallyassisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facilityas described above, or if you desire furtherinformation, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. In additionto theabove, the consultant agrees to complywith theAge DiscriminationAct of 1975, 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenic Byways
    n c s c e n i c b y w a y s a h c rol rt in o a n fourth edition s c s en ay ic byw North Carolina Department of Transportation Table of ConTenTs Click on Byway. Introduction Legend NCDOT Programs Rules of the Road Cultural Resources Blue Ridge Parkway Scenic Byways State Map MOuntains Waterfall Byway Nantahala Byway Cherohala Skyway Indian Lakes Scenic Byway Whitewater Way Forest Heritage Scenic Byway appalachian Medley French Broad Overview Historic Flat Rock Scenic Byway Drovers Road Black Mountain Rag Pacolet River Byway South Mountain Scenery Mission Crossing Little Parkway New River Valley Byway I-26 Scenic Highway u.S. 421 Scenic Byway Pisgah Loop Scenic Byway upper Yadkin Way Yadkin Valley Scenic Byway Smoky Mountain Scenic Byway Mt. Mitchell Scenic Drive PIedmont Hanging Rock Scenic Byway Colonial Heritage Byway Football Road Crowders Mountain Drive Mill Bridge Scenic Byway 2 BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS BACK TO BYWAYS MAP Table of ConTenTs uwharrie Scenic Road Rolling Kansas Byway Pee Dee Valley Drive Grassy Island Crossing Sandhills Scenic Drive Birkhead Wilderness Route Flint Hill Ramble Indian Heritage Trail Pottery Road Devil’s Stompin’ Ground Road North Durham Country Byway averasboro Battlefield Scenic Byway Clayton Bypass Scenic Byway Scots-Welsh Heritage Byway COastaL PLain Blue-Gray Scenic Byway Meteor Lakes Byway Green Swamp Byway Brunswick Town Road Cape Fear Historic Byway Lafayette’s Tour Tar Heel Trace edenton-Windsor Loop Perquimans Crossing Pamlico Scenic Byway alligator River Route Roanoke Voyages Corridor Outer Banks Scenic Byway State Parks & Recreation areas Historic Sites For More Information Bibliography 3 BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS BACK TO BYWAYS MAP inTroduction The N.C.
    [Show full text]