DOCSLIB.ORG

The Mai Ndombe Redd+ Project Second Monitoring & Implementation Report (M2)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Mai Ndombe Redd+ Project Second Monitoring & Implementation Report (M2) MONITORING REPORT: CCB Version 2, VCS Version 3 THE MAI NDOMBE REDD+ PROJECT SECOND MONITORING & IMPLEMENTATION REPORT (M2) Document Prepared by Wildlife Works Carbon Project Title The Mai Ndombe REDD+ Project Project ID 934 Version 4.3 Report ID 1 Date of Issue 22-October-2017 Project Location Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mai Ndombe Province Wildlife Works Carbon Project Proponent(s) Jeremy T. Freund [email protected]; 415-331-8081 Jeremy T. Freund, Simon Bird and Mike Korchinsky Prepared By Wildlife Works Carbon CCB v2.0, VCS v3.4 1 MONITORING REPORT: CCB Version 2, VCS Version 3 EPIC Sustainability Services K. Suryanarayana Murthy Validation/Verification Body [email protected] +91 9845759000 GHG Accounting/Crediting 14 March 2011 – 13 March 2041 Period 30-year crediting period Monitoring Period of this 01 November 2012 – 31 December 2016 Report Validation: 06 December 2011 History of CCB Status Verification (m1): 06 December 2011 Climate and Biodiversity Gold Level Criteria The Project will conserve flora and fauna within the Project Area. Protecting these 2 former logging concessions will maintain critical forested area and the ecosystem services that it provides, as well as rehabilitate habitat for endangered charismatic animals such as the Bonobo and Forest Elephant. By protecting the native forest, the Project will also increase the resilience of the ecosystem to the effects of climate change. Section GL1.4 of the CCB PDD exemplifies many additional Project Activities that will help both local communities and biodiversity to minimize and adapt to expected climate change impacts. Improved seed distribution and training on improved Gold Level Criteria agricultural methods will lead to increased yields and adaptation to changes in rainfall, the timing of growing seasons, and changing temperatures. Educational activities to increase literacy and diversify livelihoods will enable communities to adapt to expected increases in the number of and severity of natural disasters caused by climate change, and the resulting potential for increases in food insecurity and disease. Through forest protection by providing alternatives to destructive forest pathways, the Mai Ndombe REDD+ Project will also provide habitat for the bonobo (Hominidae Pan paniscus), an IUCN red-list endangered species as well as enable the return of the forest elephant. CCB v2.0, VCS v3.4 2 MONITORING REPORT: CCB Version 2, VCS Version 3 Acknowledgements We extend our heartfelt thanks to the following people and organizations, without whom conservation in the Lac Mai Ndombe region would not be possible: WWC team Mill Valley Jeremy Freund, Mike Korchinsky, Simon Bird ERA-WWC team Kinshasa Jean-Robert Bwangoy Bankanza Bolambée John Schellenberg Dodo Ndonda Gedeon Wongondombi ERA-WWC team in Inongo Bruno Ilonga, Jacques Ipoma, Anatole Bokolo, Mathieu Bolaa, Donat Mboyo Koko, Marilyn Elembe, Djems Mbalaka, Panest Ngubidi, Eddy Mbabila, Gauthier Kimpese, Guylain Nshoko, Gratien Matungulu University of Kinshasa Raymond Lumbuenamo WCS Jean-Paul Kibambe CN-REDD Victor Kabengele wa Kadilu, Frédéric Jacquemont Lastly, we extend our thanks to the communities of the Lac Mai Ndombe REDD+ Project Zone, for it is them that this project serves, and it is due their trust, acceptance and support that the project ultimately owes its success. CCB v2.0, VCS v3.4 3 MONITORING REPORT: CCB Version 2, VCS Version 3 Acronyms ACoGS Avoided Conversion of Grasslands and Shrublands AFOLU Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use APD Avoided Planned Deforestation APC Avoided Planned Conversion AUC Avoided Unplanned Conversion AUDD Avoided Unplanned Deforestation and/or Degradation BEM Biomass Emission Model CCB Climate, Community and Biodiversity CEPF Critical Ecosystem Protection Fund DNA Designated National Authority ER Emissions Reductions FAO Food and Agricultural Organization FCPF Forest Carbon Partnership Facility FPIC Free, Prior and Informed Consent GHG Greenhouse Gas GIS Geographic Information System HCV High Conservation Value IBA Important Bird Area KBA Key Biodiversity Area MNRP The Mai Ndombe REDD+ Project MRR Monitoring Report Requirements for the VM0009 V2.0 VCS methodology MRV Measuring, Reporting and Verification NGO Non-Governmental Organization NPA Natural Protected Area NTFP Non-Timber Forest Products PAA Project Accounting Area PD Verified Carbon Standard and Climate, Community and Biodiversity Project Description document REDD Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation REDD+ Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation, plus Conservation, Sustainable management of forests, and enhancement of forest carbon stocks CCB v2.0, VCS v3.4 4 MONITORING REPORT: CCB Version 2, VCS Version 3 R-PP Readiness Preparation Proposal UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change VCS Verified Carbon Standard WWC Wildlife Works Carbon CCB v2.0, VCS v3.4 5 MONITORING REPORT: CCB Version 2, VCS Version 3 Table of Contents 1 Summary of Project Benefits ............................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Unique Project Benefits ............................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Standardized Benefit Metrics ....................................................................................................... 9 2 General ............................................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Project Description ..................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Project Implementation Status ................................................................................................... 25 2.3 Stakeholder Engagement .......................................................................................................... 32 2.4 Management Capacity and Best Practices ................................................................................ 34 2.5 Legal Status and Property Rights .............................................................................................. 37 3 Climate ............................................................................................................................................... 41 3.1 Monitoring GHG Emission Reductions and Removals .............................................................. 41 3.2 Quantification of GHG Emission Reductions and Removals ..................................................... 94 3.3 Optional Criterion: Climate Change Adaptation Benefits ........................................................ 103 4 Community ....................................................................................................................................... 104 4.1 Net Positive Community Impacts ............................................................................................. 104 4.2 Offsite Stakeholder Impacts..................................................................................................... 104 4.3 Community Impact Monitoring ................................................................................................. 105 4.4 Optional Criterion: Exceptional Community Benefits ............................................................... 143 5 Biodiversity ...................................................................................................................................... 143 5.1 Net Positive Biodiversity Impacts ............................................................................................ 143 5.2 Offsite Biodiversity Impacts ..................................................................................................... 146 5.3 Biodiversity Impact Monitoring ................................................................................................. 147 6 Additional Project Implementation Information ........................................................................... 159 7 Additional Project Impact Information .......................................................................................... 160 7.1 Allometric Equations ................................................................................................................ 160 Appendix A: PROJECT AREA ................................................................................................................ 162 Appendix B: TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS ...................................................................................................... 163 Appendix C: INFRASTRUCTURE ROADS – WATER BODIES ............................................................ 164 Appendix D: LAND USE / FOREST COVER .......................................................................................... 165 CCB v2.0, VCS v3.4 6 MONITORING REPORT: CCB Version 2, VCS Version 3 1 SUMMARY OF PROJECT BENEFITS 1.1 Unique Project Benefits The Mai Ndombe REDD+ Project, located in western Democratic Republic of the Congo, is an ecologically rich and diverse area previously zoned for commercial timber extraction. It provides habitat to bonobos and forest elephants, and includes some of the most important and endangered wetlands in the world. It is also home to some 50,000 people, most of whom live on the shores of Lake Mai Ndombe, and along the main roadway leading from the lakeshore city of Selenge towards the northwest project area boundary.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Deforestation and Forest Degradation Activities in the DRC
    E4838 V5 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, NATURE CONSERVATION AND TOURISM Public Disclosure Authorized STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE REDD+ PROCESS Public Disclosure Authorized BASELINE REPORT STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE REDD+ Public Disclosure Authorized PROCESS Public Disclosure Authorized October 2014 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE REDD+ PROCESS in the DRC INDEX OF REPORTS Environmental Analysis Document Assessment of Risks and Challenges REDD+ National Strategy of the DRC Strategic Environmental and Social Assessment Report (SESA) Framework Document Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) O.P. 4.01, 4.04, 4.37 Policies and Sector Planning Documents Pest and Pesticide Cultural Heritage Indigenous Peoples Process Framework Management Management Planning Framework (FF) Resettlement Framework Framework (IPPF) O.P.4.12 Policy Framework (PPMF) (CHMF) O.P.4.10 (RPF) O.P.4.09 O.P 4.11 O.P. 4.12 Consultation Reports Survey Report Provincial Consultation Report National Consultation of June 2013 Report Reference and Analysis Documents REDD+ National Strategy Framework of the DRC Terms of Reference of the SESA October 2014 Strategic Environmental and Social Assessment SESA Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory Note ........................................................................................................................................ 9 1. Preface ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mai-Ndombe Province: a REDD+ Laboratory in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
    RIGHTS AND RESOURCES INITIATIVE | MARCH 2018 Rights and Resources Initiative 2715 M Street NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20007 P : +1 202.470.3900 | F : +1 202.944.3315 www.rightsandresources.org About the Rights and Resources Initiative RRI is a global coalition consisting of 15 Partners, 7 Affiliated Networks, 14 International Fellows, and more than 150 collaborating international, regional, and community organizations dedicated to advancing the forestland and resource rights of Indigenous Peoples and local communities. RRI leverages the capacity and expertise of coalition members to promote secure local land and resource rights and catalyze progressive policy and market reforms. RRI is coordinated by the Rights and Resources Group, a non-profit organization based in Washington, DC. For more information, please visit www.rightsandresources.org. Partners Affiliated Networks Sponsors The views presented here are not necessarily shared by the agencies that have generously supported this work, or all of the Partners and Affiliated Networks of the RRI Coalition. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0. – 2 – Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Executive summary ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ACTIVE USG PROGRAMS for the DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC of the CONGO RESPONSE Last Updated 07/27/20
    ACTIVE USG PROGRAMS FOR THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO RESPONSE Last Updated 07/27/20 BAS-UELE HAUT-UELE ITURI S O U T H S U D A N COUNTRYWIDE NORTH KIVU OCHA IMA World Health Samaritan’s Purse AIRD Internews CARE C.A.R. Samaritan’s Purse Samaritan’s Purse IMA World Health IOM UNHAS CAMEROON DCA ACTED WFP INSO Medair FHI 360 UNICEF Samaritan’s Purse Mercy Corps IMA World Health NRC NORD-UBANGI IMC UNICEF Gbadolite Oxfam ACTED INSO NORD-UBANGI Samaritan’s WFP WFP Gemena BAS-UELE Internews HAUT-UELE Purse ICRC Buta SCF IOM SUD-UBANGI SUD-UBANGI UNHAS MONGALA Isiro Tearfund IRC WFP Lisala ACF Medair UNHCR MONGALA ITURI U Bunia Mercy Corps Mercy Corps IMA World Health G A EQUATEUR Samaritan’s NRC EQUATEUR Kisangani N Purse WFP D WFPaa Oxfam Boende A REPUBLIC OF Mbandaka TSHOPO Samaritan’s ATLANTIC NORTH GABON THE CONGO TSHUAPA Purse TSHOPO KIVU Lake OCEAN Tearfund IMA World Health Goma Victoria Inongo WHH Samaritan’s Purse RWANDA Mercy Corps BURUNDI Samaritan’s Purse MAI-NDOMBE Kindu Bukavu Samaritan’s Purse PROGRAM KEY KINSHASA SOUTH MANIEMA SANKURU MANIEMA KIVU WFP USAID/BHA Non-Food Assistance* WFP ACTED USAID/BHA Food Assistance** SA ! A IMA World Health TA N Z A N I A Kinshasa SH State/PRM KIN KASAÏ Lusambo KWILU Oxfam Kenge TANGANYIKA Agriculture and Food Security KONGO CENTRAL Kananga ACTED CRS Cash Transfers For Food Matadi LOMAMI Kalemie KASAÏ- Kabinda WFP Concern Economic Recovery and Market Tshikapa ORIENTAL Systems KWANGO Mbuji T IMA World Health KWANGO Mayi TANGANYIKA a KASAÏ- n Food Vouchers g WFP a n IMC CENTRAL y i k
    [Show full text]
  • CAP 2004 Drcongo SCREEN.Pdf
    In Tribute In 2003 many United Nations, International Organisation, and Non-Governmental Organisation staff members died while helping people in several countries struck by crisis. Scores more were attacked and injured. Aid agency staff members were abducted. Some continue to be held against their will. In recognition of our colleagues’ commitment to humanitarian action and pledging to continue the work we began together We dedicate this year’s appeals to them. FOR ADDITIONAL COPIES, PLEASE CONTACT: UN OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS PALAIS DES NATIONS 8-14 AVENUE DE LA PAIX CH - 1211 GENEVA, SWITZERLAND TEL.: (41 22) 917.1972 FAX: (41 22) 917.0368 E-MAIL: [email protected] THIS DOCUMENT CAN ALSO BE FOUND ON HTTP://WWW.RELIEFWEB.INT/ UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, November 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................. 1 Summary of Requirements – By Appealing Organisation .............................................................................2 Summary of Requirements – By Sector ........................................................................................................ 3 2. THE YEAR IN REVIEW................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Changes In the Humanitarian Situation................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Financial
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the National Program for Onchocerciasis Control in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease Review Review of the National Program for Onchocerciasis Control in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Jean-Claude Makenga Bof 1,* , Fortunat Ntumba Tshitoka 2, Daniel Muteba 2, Paul Mansiangi 3 and Yves Coppieters 1 1 Ecole de Santé Publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium; [email protected] 2 Ministry of Health: Program of Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD) for Preventive Chemotherapy (PC), Gombe, Kinshasa, DRC; [email protected] (F.N.T.); [email protected] (D.M.) 3 Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa (UNIKIN), Lemba, Kinshasa, DRC; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +32-493-93-96-35 Received: 3 May 2019; Accepted: 30 May 2019; Published: 13 June 2019 Abstract: Here, we review all data available at the Ministry of Public Health in order to describe the history of the National Program for Onchocerciasis Control (NPOC) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Discovered in 1903, the disease is endemic in all provinces. Ivermectin was introduced in 1987 as clinical treatment, then as mass treatment in 1989. Created in 1996, the NPOC is based on community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI). In 1999, rapid epidemiological mapping for onchocerciasis surveys were launched to determine the mass treatment areas called “CDTI Projects”. CDTI started in 2001 and certain projects were stopped in 2005 following the occurrence of serious adverse events. Surveys coupled with rapid assessment procedures for loiasis and onchocerciasis rapid epidemiological assessment were launched to identify the areas of treatment for onchocerciasis and loiasis.
    [Show full text]
  • Republique Democratique Du Congo Rapport De Base Redd+
    REPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE DU CONGO MINISTERE DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT, CONSERVATION DE LA NATURE ET TOURISME EVALUATION ENVIRONNEMENTALE ET SOCIALE STRATÉGIQUE DU PROCESSUS REDD+ RAPPORT DE BASE ANALYSE ENVIRONNEMENTALE ET SOCIALE STRATÉGIQUE DU PROCESSUS REDD+ 6 Janvier 2015 ÉVALUATION ENVIRONNEMENTALE ET SOCIALE STRATEGIQUE DU PROCESSUS REDD+ en RDC INDEX DES RAPPORTS Document d’analyse environnementale Évaluation des risques et des enjeux Stratégie Nationale REDD+ de la RDC Rapport d’Evaluation Environnementale et Sociale Stratégique (EESS) Document cadre Cadre de Gestion Environnementale et Sociale (CGES) O.P. 4.01, 4.04, 4.37 Documents de politiques et de planification sectoriel Cadre de Gestion des Cadre de Gestion du Cadre de Planification en Cadre Fonctionnel Pestes et Pesticides Patrimoine Culturel Faveur des Populations (CF) Cadre de Politique Autochtones (CGPP) (CGPC) O.P.4.12 de Réinstallation O.P.4.09 O.P 4.11 (CPFPA) (CPR) O.P.4.10 O.P. 4.12 Rapports des Consultations Rapport d’enquête Rapport des consultations Rapport des consultations provinciales nationales de juin 2013 Documents de référence et d’analyse Stratégie Nationale Cadre REDD+ de la RDC Termes de référence de l’EESS 6 Janvier 2015 Évaluation environnementale et sociale stratégique Rapport de L’EESS TABLE DES MATIERES Note liminaire ............................................................................................................................................. 9 1. Avant propos ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidated Report on the Livelihood Zones of the Democratic Republic
    CONSOLIDATED REPORT ON THE LIVELIHOOD ZONES OF THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO DECEMBER 2016 Contents ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................... 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... 6 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Livelihoods zoning ....................................................................................................................7 1.2 Implementation of the livelihood zoning ...................................................................................8 2. RURAL LIVELIHOODS IN DRC - AN OVERVIEW .................................................................. 11 2.1 The geographical context ........................................................................................................ 11 2.2 The shared context of the livelihood zones ............................................................................. 14 2.3 Food security questions ......................................................................................................... 16 3. SUMMARY DESCRIPTIONS OF THE LIVELIHOOD ZONES .................................................... 18 CD01 COPPERBELT AND MARGINAL AGRICULTURE ....................................................................... 18 CD01: Seasonal calendar ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwe's Resource Colonialism in Democratic Republic of Congo
    “[OSLEG has] the resources to protect and defend, support logistically, and assist generally in the development of commercial ventures to explore, research, exploit and market the mineral, timber, and other resources held by the state of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.” Extract from the partnership agreement between the Zimbabwean company OSLEG and the Kinshasha based Comiex-Congo, whose majority shareholder was Laurent Desire Kabila, former president of the DRC. Global Witness Ltd P O Box 6042, London N19 5WP, United Kingdom telephone: + 44 (0)20 7272 6731 fax: + 44 (0)20 7272 9425 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.globalwitness.org/ ISBN 1 903304 05 9 Recommendations contained on page 2 2nd edition: Updated February 2002 Branching Out Zimbabwe’s Resource Colonialism in Democratic Republic of Congo A Report by Global Witness. February 2002 Branching Out – Zimbabwe’s Resource Colonialism in Democratic Republic of Congo 40 20 ∞ ∞ 0∞ 20∞ 40∞ 60 ∞ Contents 40∞ 40∞ Recommendations M e d Algiers i t e Tunis r r TUNISIA a Rabat n Madeira Is. e a n S e Preface (PORTUGAL) a MOROCCO Tripoli Canary Is. Cairo (SPAIN) ALGERIA Introduction Laayoun LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA EGYPT Western Sahara The timber deal R e d S 20 e 20 ∞ MAURITANIA a ∞ . The creation of SOCEBO CAPE VERDE Nouakchott NIGER MALI ERITREA Dakar CHAD Khartoum Praia Asmara . Supporting information SENEGAL Niamey Lake GAMBIA Bamako Chad n Banjul SUDAN Ade BURKINA FASO f of Socotra N'Djamena DJIBOUTI Gul Bissau (YEMEN) Ouagadougou Djibouti GUINEA-BISSAU GUINEA . Will the deal happen as planned? B E NIGERIA G T Conakry H N ETHIOPIA O C‘TE- A I Freetown G N Abuja N A D'IVOIRE A O Addis Ababa SIERRA CENTRAL I LEONE Yamoussoukro L Monrovia Accra AFRICAN REPUBLIC A .
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying Epidemiological Drivers of Gambiense Human African Trypanosomiasis Across the Democratic Republic of Congo
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.23.20138065; this version posted October 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license . Quantifying epidemiological drivers of gambiense human African Trypanosomiasis across the Democratic Republic of Congo Ronald E Crump1,2,3Y*, Ching-I Huang1,2Y, Ed Knock1,4, Simon E F Spencer1,4, Paul Brown1,2, Erick Mwamba Miaka5, Chansy Shampa5, Matt J Keeling1,2,3, Kat S Rock1,2 1 Zeeman Institute for System Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, The University of Warwick, Coventry, U.K. 2 Mathematics Institute, The University of Warwick, Coventry, U.K. 3 The School of Life Sciences, The University of Warwick, Coventry, U.K. 4 The Department of Statistics, The University of Warwick, Coventry, U.K. 5 Programme National de Lutte contre la Trypanosomiase Humaine Africaine (PNLTHA), Kinshasa, D.R.C. YThese authors contributed equally to this work. * [email protected] Abstract Gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT) is a virulent disease declining in burden but still endemic in West and Central Africa. Although it is targeted for elimination of transmission by 2030, there remain numerous questions about the drivers of infection and how these vary geographically. In this study we focus on the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), which accounted for 84% of the global case burden in 2016, to explore changes in transmission across the country and elucidate factors which may have contributed to the persistence of disease or success of interventions in different regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretariat 17 April 2013
    United Nations ST/IC/2013/7/Amend.1 Secretariat 17 April 2013 Information circular* To: Members of the staff From: The Assistant Secretary-General for Human Resources Management Subject: Designation of duty stations for purposes of rest and recuperation 1. Further to the issuance of information circular ST/IC/2013/7 dated 23 January 2013, please be advised that the Office of Human Resources Management approves the following duty stations in Burkina Faso, Mauritania and Myanmar for rest and recuperation purposes: (a) Burkina Faso A 12-week rest and recuperation frequency for Dori; (b) Mauritania A 12-week rest and recuperation frequency for Nema; (c) Myanmar A 12-week rest and recuperation frequency for Myitkyina (Kachin state) and Sittwe. 2. The present circular reflects the rest and recuperation frequencies and locations authorized as at 1 February 2013. * Expiration date of the present information circular: 30 June 2013. 13-29404 (E) 230413 *1329404* ST/IC/2013/7/Amend.1 Annex Consolidated list of duty stationsa approved by the Office of Human Resources Management for rest and recuperation (effective as at 1 February 2013) Rest and recuperation Duty station Frequency destination Afghanistan Kandahar 4 weeks Dubai Rest of country 6 weeks Dubai Algeria Tindouf 8 weeks Las Palmas Burkina Faso Dori 12 weeks Ouagadougou Burundi Ngozi 12 weeks Nairobi Central African Republic Rest of country except Bangui 8 weeks Yaoundé Chad Entire country 8 weeks Addis Ababa Côte d’Ivoire Duékoué, Guiglo, Tai, Toulepleu 6 weeks Accra Rest of country 8 weeks
    [Show full text]
  • Banea Et Al., 2015A
    Vol. 9(2), pp. 43-50, February 2015 DOI: 10.5897/AJFS2014.1206 Article Number: 52065B849983 ISSN 1996-0794 African Journal of Food Science Copyright © 2015 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/AJFS Full Length Research Paper Survey of the konzo prevalence of village people and their nutrition in Kwilu District, Bandundu Province, DRC Jean Pierre Banea1, J. Howard Bradbury2*, Damien Nahimana1, Ian C. Denton2, N. Mashukano1 and N'landa Kuwa1 1Programme National de Nutrition (PRONANUT), Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). 2EEG, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. Received 4 September, 2014; Accepted 7 January, 2015 Konzo is a sudden spastic paraparesis that causes permanent paralysis of the legs and occurs mainly in children and young women. Konzo results from high cyanogen intake and malnutrition caused by a monotonous diet of bitter cassava. The known incidence of konzo in DRC up to 2009 is 3469 cases, but an estimate in 2002 was 100,000 cases. To help resolve this question a konzo survey was made in three health zones in Kwilu District, Bandundu Province, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and the nutrition of those with konzo recorded. Thirty villages (population 22793) in Kwilu District were surveyed for konzo cases, and food consumption scores and mid upper arm circumferences obtained. There were 172 konzo cases with village konzo prevalences of 0.1-17%. The mean konzo prevalence in Masimanimba and Kingandu health zones was much less than in Payikongila health zone, probably because of the higher rate of malnutrition in Payikongila.
    [Show full text]
  • Charting a Future for Peacekeeping in the Democratic Republic of Congo
    CHARTING A FUTURE FOR PEACEKEEPING IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO RECOGNIZE. PREVENT. PROTECT. AMEND. PROTECT. PREVENT. RECOGNIZE. COVER IMAGE: A MONUSCO delegation waits to board a UN OCTOBER 2019 helicopter at the end of a mission in South Kivu. During the trip, members of MONUSCO’s Child Protection and DDR sections engaged with non-state armed actors to encourage an end to the T +1 202 558 6958 use of child soldiers by these groups. E [email protected] MONUSCO Photo/Jacob de Lange civiliansinconflict.org ii Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC) works to improve protection for civilians caught in conflicts around the world. We work with armed actors and civilians in conflict to develop and implement solutions to prevent, mitigate, and respond to civilian harm. We bring the voices of civilians themselves to those making decisions affecting their lives. CIVIC’s vision is for a future where parties involved in conflicts recognize the dignity and rights of civilians, prevent harm, protect civilians caught in conflict, and amend harm. To accomplish this, we assess the causes of civilian harm in particular conflicts, craft creative solutions to address that harm, and engage with civilians, governments, militaries, and international and regional institutions to implement these solutions. We measure our success in the short-term by the adoption of new policies and practices that lead to the improved wellbeing of civilians caught in a conflict. In the long-term, our goal is to create a new global mindset around robust civilian protection and harm response. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Lauren Spink, Senior Researcher on Peacekeeping at CIVIC authored this policy brief.
    [Show full text]