DOCSLIB.ORG

CA Nr. 80 14 Noiembrie 2018 R EP O R T 1. PREAMBLE the Enquiry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CA Nr. 80 14 Noiembrie 2018 R EP O R T 1. PREAMBLE the Enquiry CA nr. 80 14 noiembrie 2018 Enquiry Committee for the elucidation of the de facto and de jure circumstances surrounding the interference of the Foundation „Otwarty Dialog” (Open Dialogue) and its founder Ludmila Kozlowska in the internal affairs of the Republic of Moldova and the financing of certain political parties from the Republic of Moldova R EP O R T 1. PREAMBLE The Enquiry Committee for the elucidation of the de facto and de jure circumstances surrounding the interference of the Foundation „Otwarty Dialog” (Open Dialogue) and its founder, Ludmila Kozlowska in the internal affairs of the Republic of Moldova and the financing of certain political parties from the Republic of Moldova (hereinafter – the Committee) was established in accordance with article 34 of the Parliament’s Rules of Procedure through the Decision of the Parliament no. 204 of 4 October 2018, with the following membership: ▪ RĂDUCAN Marcel – Parliamentary Faction of the Democratic Party of Moldova; ▪ REŞETNICOV Artur – Parliamentary Faction of the Democratic Party of Moldova; ▪ VREMEA Igor – Parliamentary Faction of the Democratic Party of Moldova; ▪ BOLEA Vasile – Parliamentary Faction of the Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova; ▪ LEBEDINSCHI Adrian – Parliamentary Faction of the Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova; ▪ GRIŞCIUC Simion – European People’s Parliamentary Group. 1.1. The goal of the Committee The goal of the Committee is to elucidate the de facto and de jure circumstances regarding the accusations, made in public, of interference in the internal affairs of the Republic of Moldova and illegal financing of certain political parties by the Foundation „Otwarty Dialog” (Open Dialogue) and its founder, Ludmila Kozlowska. The Committee intended to study, establish, elucidate and take attitude in accordance with the constitutional competences of the legislative forum of the country with respect to the risks to the national security posed by the activity of the investigated subject, qualifiable as an activity of foreign diversionary intelligence directed against the Republic of Moldova. Republica Moldova, MD-2073, Chişinău [email protected] Bd. Ştefan cel Mare şi Sfînt 105 www.parlament.md In accordance with the competences with which the Parliament of the Republic of Moldova invested the Committee, the Committee set out to identify the presence or absence of potential threats to the constitutional order and sovereignty of the Republic of Moldova and to the relations of the Republic of Moldova with foreign development partners, especially with the European Union and its institutions. Besides this, the Committee was tasked with defining from a political and legal viewpoint the potential threats and to formulate, within the limit of the checks and balances, recommendations for the institutions with a view to suppressing and combating them, in accordance with their legal competences. 1.2. Organising and procedures In accordance with the provisions of article 35 para. (1) of the Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, the enquiry committees are established in conformity with the provisions referring to standing committees. Thus, the Chairpersons, Deputy Chairpersons and Secretaries of the Enquiry Committees are elected by the Parliament with the vote of the majority of the elected MPs. On 5 October 2018, the Committee convened in the first sitting and, given the lack of an express appointment through the Parliament’s Decision no. 204 of 04.10.2018 of the Chairperson, Deputy Chairperson and Secretary of the Committee, the majority of the MPs present voted for the following leadership of the Committee (subsequently, on 12 October 2018, it was approved by the Parliament’s plenum by Decision no. 210): ▪ Chairman of the Committee – VREMEA Igor; ▪ Deputy Chairman of the Committee – REȘETNICOV Artur; ▪ Secretary of the Committee – GRIȘCIUC Simion. By Decision no. 204/2018, the Parliament established a 30 days deadline from the moment of the adoption until the submission of the report. Considering the complexity of the activity of the Committee, the lack of responses to all the requests submitted, the number of persons invited and heard, the checking of documents that had to be analysed by the members of the Committee and the drawing up of the final report, the deadline for the submission of the report was changed from 30 to 60 days through the Parliament’s Decision no. 211 of 25 October 2018 on the amendment of art. 2 of Parliament’s Decision no. 204 of 4 October 2018 regarding the establishment of the Committee. In its activity, the Committee abided by the Constitution of the Republic of Moldova, the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament, adopted through Law no. 797/1996, as well as the relevant active legislation. From the procedural viewpoint, the Committee took into consideration the conclusions and findings of the Constitutional Court laid down in the Decision no. 3 of 15 February 1 2013 on the constitutionality check of the Parliament’s Decision regarding the enquiry committee in the Pădurea Domnească case (the competence of parliamentary enquiry committees) no. 29 of 23 September 2013. In accordance with art. 36 para. (l) of the Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, the Enquiry Committee shall summon as witness any person who is in possession of information about an act or a circumstance that could be useful in the investigation of the cause. The Committee mentions that, in the framework of the enquiry, the representatives of the judicial power, of the prosecution authority and the criminal prosecution entity cannot be summoned for submitting information that could prejudice the fairness of the trial and/or the confidentiality of the criminal prosecution. Concomitantly, judging by the findings and appreciations formulated by the Constitutional Court in Decision no. 29/2013, it is necessary to keep in mind the following: ▪ The goal of parliamentary enquiry committees is to establish the existence or inexistence of the acts, but without establishing (with certainty) the contravention liability or the material, disciplinary or criminal liability of a person; ▪ It is inadmissible to summon persons that are suspected or accused in criminal cause and to hear them in the enquiry committee with respect to the circumstances that underlie the criminal charges, otherwise, there is a danger of encroaching upon the right to silence, protected by art. 6 of the European Convention and, implicitly, the presumption of innocence provided for in art. 21 of the Constitution; ▪ It is inadmissible to make any public declarations (or made by other means) bringing serious accusations that are not proved under strictly regulated procedures, to concrete persons; ▪ The findings, conclusions and recommendations (proposals) comprised in the report of the enquiry committee shall not contain legal norms, as the legal norm, according to Law no. 780/2001 on legislative acts, is a compulsory social rule, a general, official, impersonal and sanctionable prescription applicable to an entire series of concrete situations. In the process of elucidating the de facto and de jure circumstances surrounding the interference of the Foundation „Otwarty Dialog” (Open Dialogue) and its founder, Ludmila Kozlowska in the internal affairs of the Republic of Moldova and the financing of certain political parties from the Republic of Moldova, the Committee received information with a degree of secrecy established in art. 11 para. (2) letters b) and c) of Law no. 245/2008 regarding state secret from the Security and Intelligence Service (no.2/2038c of 11 October 2018), the Prosecution Office for Combating Organised Criminality and Special Causes (no.7C of 1 November 2018) and the Service for Combating and Preventing Money Laundering (no.03/03-697 of 24 October 2018). The given information is contained in this report and will be presented during an in camera sitting, MPs being legally liable for its illegal disclosure. 2 1.3. Applicable legal framework Art. 25 para. (1) of Law no. 294/2007 on the political parties stipulates that the sources of financing for political parties shall be: • Party membership fees; • donations, including those raised at recreational, cultural, sports or other type of mass events organised by the party on the condition that they are recorded in the established manner; • state budget subsidies, pursuant to the regulations of this law and of the yearly budget law; • Other legal incomes obtained in accordance with art. 24 para. (3). Political parties have the right to carry out editorial activities, activities connected directly with the administration of their property, as well as other activities bringing profits for the needs of the party, if such activities are not prohibited by law and are explicitly provided for in the statute of the political party. Art. 26 para. (1) of Law no. 294/2007 on political parties indicates expressly that donations made to political parties may be of the following kinds: • Pecuniary donations, other than the membership fees; • Donations made in the form of property, goods, free of charge services or under conditions that are more advantageous than the commercial value on the market, the payment of certain goods or services used by the party. At the same time, art. 26 para. (4)– (5) of Law no. 294/2007 on the political parties establishes the legal limit of donations. Thus, a natural person may make donation to one or more political parties, not exceeding a total of 200 average monthly salaries, established for the respective year
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Moldova: from Oligarchic Pluralism to Plahotniuc's Hegemony
    Centre for Eastern Studies NUMBER 208 | 07.04.2016 www.osw.waw.pl Moldova: from oligarchic pluralism to Plahotniuc’s hegemony Kamil Całus Moldova’s political system took shape due to the six-year rule of the Alliance for European Integration coalition but it has undergone a major transformation over the past six months. Resorting to skilful political manoeuvring and capitalising on his control over the Moldovan judiciary system, Vlad Plahotniuc, one of the leaders of the nominally pro-European Democra- tic Party and the richest person in the country, was able to bring about the arrest of his main political competitor, the former prime minister Vlad Filat, in October 2015. Then he pushed through the nomination of his trusted aide, Pavel Filip, for prime minister. In effect, Plahot- niuc has concentrated political and business influence in his own hands on a scale unseen so far in Moldova’s history since 1991. All this indicates that he already not only controls the judi- ciary, the anti-corruption institutions, the Constitutional Court and the economic structures, but has also subordinated the greater part of parliament and is rapidly tightening his grip on the section of the state apparatus which until recently was influenced by Filat. Plahotniuc, whose power and position depends directly on his control of the state apparatus and financial flows in Moldova, is not interested in a structural transformation of the country or in implementing any thorough reforms; this includes the Association Agreement with the EU. This means that as his significance grows, the symbolic actions so far taken with the aim of a structural transformation of the country will become even more superficial.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Laundromat – a $70 Billion Money-Laundering Scheme Facilitated by Moldovan Political Elites
    The Russian Laundromat – a $70 billion money-laundering scheme facilitated by Moldovan political elites Authors: Sergiu Tofilat, Community WatchDog.MD Veaceslav Negruta, Transparency International Moldova Chisinau, June 2019 Abbreviations AML Anti-money laundering NAC National Anticorruption Center NBM National Bank of Moldova OPFML Office for Prevention and Fight against Money Laundering SCM Supreme Council of Magistracy SCS Supreme Council of Security Executive summary In 2014, public opinion worldwide was staggered by revelations of a massive money laundering scheme in Eastern Europe published by the investigative journalists from OCCRP and dubbed the “Russian Laundromat”1. During 2010-2014, billions of US dollars from Russian banks were laundered through Moldovan banks, using illicit court rulings on defaulted fake debts. The laundered funds were further transferred to a group of shell companies having accounts in Western banks. Although law enforcement officers from Moldova pretend to have tracked down $20 billion of suspicious money, publicly available evidence shows that the real amount of laundered funds amounted to as much as $70 billion. Not a single person from the Moldovan banking supervisory or prosecution authorities has been sentenced so far for allowing this to take place on their watch. Moreover, several individuals directly involved were recently promoted to the Constitutional Court. This research summarizes the arguments on how Moldovan supervisory and prosecution authorities, captured by and subordinated to certain political elites, knowingly turned a blind eye on suspicious activities, while the Parliament and the Constitutional Court approved legislative changes to facilitate the money laundering scheme. 1. How the money was moved from Russia to Moldova and onward The laundered Russian money may have come from unsecured bank loans, fictitious acquisitions related to government contracts, misappropriation of funds from the Russian treasury, tax evasion and smuggling.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurnalistii 9.Indd
    Jurnaliștii contra corupţ iei9 Chişinău, 2014 CZU 328.185(478)(082)=135.1=161.1 J 93 Pictor: Ion Mîţu Această lucrare este editată cu suportul fi nanciar al Fundaţiei Est-Europene, din mijloacele oferite de Guvernul Suediei şi Ministerul Afacerilor Externe al Danemarcei. Opiniile exprimate în ea aparţin autorilor şi nu refl ectă neapărat poziţia Transparency International – Moldova şi a fi nanţatorilor. Difuzare gratuită Descrierea CIP a Camerei Naţionale a Cărţii Jurnaliştii contra corupţiei: [în Rep. Moldova] / Transparency Intern. Moldova; pictor: Ion Mâţu. – Ch.: Transparency Intern. Moldova, 2014 (Tipogr. “Bons Offi ces” SRL). – ISBN 978-9975-80-108-9 [Partea] a 9-a. – 2014. – 280 p. – Text: lb. rom., rusă. ISBN. 978-9975-80-864-4 800 ex. – 1. Jurnalişti – Corupţie – Republica Moldova – Combatere (rom., rusă). Copyright © Transparency International - Moldova, 2014 Transparency International - Moldova Str. „31 August 1989”, nr. 98, of. 205, Chişinău, Republica Moldova, MD-2004 Tel. (373-22) 203484, e-mail: offi [email protected] www.transparency.md ISBN 978-9975-80-108-9 ISBN 978-9975-80-864-4 Cuprins: Cuvânt înainte .................................................................................................... 6 Copiii satului şi afacerile primarului, Tudor Iaşcenco .................................. 7 Imperiul lui Plahotniuc, Mariana Rață........................................................ 11 Interesele avocatului copilului sau pentru cine lucrează Tamara Plămădeală?, Natalia Porubin ..................................................................... 16 Locuinţe ieftine pentru procurori bogaţi, Olga Ceaglei ..............................21 Localitatea Ghidighici, „afacerea” familiei Begleţ, Lilia Zaharia .............. 25 Сага о недоступе к информации, Руслан Михалевский ........................ 27 Cât l-a costat pe Nichifor luxul de la puşcărie?, Iana Zmeu ....................... 33 Averile şi veniturile ascunse ale procurorului Gherasimenco. „El se temea să nu-l afl e lumea că are casă aşa de mare”, Pavel Păduraru ..........
    [Show full text]
  • Puterea Hibridă Și Actorii
    IDIS „Viitorul” reprezintă o instituţie de cercetare, instruire și iniţiativă publică, care Institutul pentru Dezvoltare și Iniţiative Sociale (IDIS) „Viitorul” activează pe o serie de domenii legate de: analiză economică, guvernare, cercetare politică, planificare strategică și management al cunoștinţelor. IDIS activează în calitate de platformă comună care reunește tineri intelectuali, preocupaţi de succesul tranziţiei spre economia de piaţă și societatea deschisă în Republica Moldova. Institutul pentru Dezvoltare și Iniţiative Sociale (IDIS) „Viitorul” este succesorul de drept al Fundaţiei Viitorul, și păstrează în linii mari tradiţiile, obiectivele și principiile de acţiune ale Institutul pentru Dezvoltare şi Iniţiative Sociale (IDIS) „Viitorul” fundaţiei, printre care se numără: formarea de instituţii democratice și dezvoltarea unui spirit de responsabilitate efectivă printre oamenii politici, funcţionari publici și cetăţenii ţării noastre, consolidarea societăţii civile și spiritului critic, promovarea libertăţilor și valorilor unei societăţi deschise, modernizate și pro-europene. RAPORT DE PREVENIRE PUTEREAA CRIZELOR HIBRIDĂ Ianuarie - Aprilie 2011 ȘI ACTORII SĂI Operațiunea „Laundromat”: ANALIZA ACTORILOR ȘI ACȚIUNILOR ÎNTREPRINSE Cornel Ciurea Leonid Litra Operațiunea „Laundromat”: ANALIZAVeaceslav ACTORILOR Berbeca ȘI ACȚIUNILOR ÎNREPRINS E Alexandru Fala 1 1 Veaceslav BERBECA Ion TĂBÂRȚĂ Peer Review: Igor MUNTEANU Institutul pentru Dezvoltare str. Iacob Hâncu 10/1, Chișinău 373 / 22 221844 tel offi[email protected] Monitor de și
    [Show full text]
  • Why Is Progress Towards Rule of Law So Challenging? the Cases of Ukraine and Moldova
    Why Is Progress Towards Rule of Law So Challenging? The Cases of Ukraine and Moldova Why Is Progress Towards Rule of Law So Challenging? The Cases of Ukraine and Moldova John Lough and Iulian Rusu Why Is Progress Towards Rule of Law So Challenging? ABOUT THE AUTHORS John Lough is an associate fellow of the Russia and Eurasia Programme at Chatham House and is the co-author of several reports of the Chatham House Ukraine Forum, including its inaugural publication (with Iryna Solonenko) Can Ukraine Achieve a Reform Breakthrough? (2016). He is also the author of the Chatham House report The Influence of Systema in Ukraine (forthcoming). Iulian Rusu is deputy executive director of the Institute for European Policies and Reforms in Chisinau where he is responsible for the justice, rule of law and DCFTA sectors as well as the preparation of shadow progress reports on the implementation of the EU-Moldova Association Agreement. The authors are grateful to Oksana Basystyuk who provided valuable assistance with the research for this study. 4 Contents Contents 1. Instead of a preface: Why (read) this study? 6 2. Introduction 9 2.1 What is rule of law? 9 2.2 The west’s loss of allure 9 2.3 Scale of the challenge in Ukraine and Moldova 10 2.4 Serving leaders, not citizens 11 2.5 Entrenched interests thwart real change 11 3. Ukraine 16 3.1 The Yanukovych legacy 16 3.2 After the revolution, brakes on progress 17 3.3 Justice sector reforms 2014–2020 18 3.3.1 Halting start for new anti-corruption bodies 18 3.3.2 Judiciary 19 3.3.3 Prosecution Service 21 3.3.4 Police 22 3.3.5 Security Service (SBU) 23 3.4 Half measures yield predictable results 23 3.5 Lessons learned 24 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartea Neagră a Risipei Banilor Publici in Republica Moldova 2019 Cuvânt Înainte
    Coordonatori: Petru Macovei Sergiu Boghean Redactor: Viorica Zaharia Autori: Svetlana Cernov Victor Moșneag Anatolie Eșanu Tudor Iașcenco Viorica Zaharia Natalia Cozma Mariana Colun Mariana Raţă Paginarea computerizată: Angela Ivanesi Chișinău 2019 Lucrarea a fost publicată de către Biroul Regional pentru Europa de Sud-Est al Fundaţiei Friedrich Naumann pentru Libertate (Sofia, Bulgaria), cu suportul financiar al Ministerului Afacerilor Externe al Republicii Federale Germane, în cadrul proiectului „Dezvoltarea cooperării cu societatea civilă în ţările Parteneriatului Estic și Rusia”. Fundaţia Friedrich Naumann pentru Libertate, dar și Ministerul Afacerilor Externe al Republicii Federale Germane, nu sunt responsabile pentru conţinutul publicaţiei. Părerile exprimate în această publicaţie sunt exclusiv ale autorilor. Acestea nu reflectă obligatoriu opiniile Fundaţiei Friedrich Naumann pentru Libertate, dar nici ale Ministerului Afacerilor Externe al Republicii Federale Germane. Această publicaţie poate fi reprodusă, stocată sau transmisă sub orice formă sau prin orice mijloace doar cu permisiunea scrisă a editorului. Întrebările referitoare la reproducerea în alte condiţii decât cele prezentate trebuie adresate Fundaţiei Friedrich Naumann pentru Libertate la adresa: [email protected] Cuvânt înainte ....................................................................................................... 4 Milioane de lei delapidate la Criuleni dintr-un proiect transfrontalier .......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Moldova: Small Country – Big Problem! Corruption and a Mono-Garchy
    Moldova: Small country – big problem! Corruption and a mono-garchy Petrus C. Van Duyne and Brendan Quirke1 Introduction What is corruption? One of the many answers to this question is: “It is a misuse of public office for private gain” (Svensson, 2005: 19). Though this short definition is widely used, it is imprecise. It intends to cover a too wide range of law breaking, from bribery to embezzlement to fraud, clientelism and secret dealings. We prefer to bring all these modes of conduct under the umbrella of breach of integrity. However, the concept of integrity needs further precision. The online Oxford Dictionary brings us one step further with the following definition of integrity: “The quality of being honest and having strong moral principles.” That leaves us to define the constituting elements of honesty and moral principles. We suggest that these concern truthfulness and behaving according to yardsticks. According to Van Duyne (2001), what is central in the concept is the decision making ac- cording to yardsticks: corruption erodes the integrity of decision making and leads to bending or evading its standards which an honest decision maker should refuse. Van Duyne (2001) formulates it as follows: “Corruption is an improbity or decay in the decision-making process in which a decision-maker (in a private corporation or in a public service) consents or demands to deviate from the criterion, which should rule his decision making, in exchange for a reward, the promise or expecta- tion of it”. We will use the concepts of corruption and integrity breaches interchange- ably, but always within the framework of the integrity of decision making.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom House, Its Academic Advisers, and the Author(S) of This Report
    Moldova By Victor Gotișan Capital: Chisinau Population: 3.5 Million GNI/capita, PPP: $5,670 Source: World Bank World Development Indicators. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 National Democratic 5.75 6.00 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.75 5.75 5.75 Governance Electoral Process 4.00 4.25 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Civil Society 3.75 3.50 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 Independent Media 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Local Democratic 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.50 5.50 Governance Judicial Framework 4.50 4.75 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.75 4.75 4.75 5.00 5.00 and Independence Corruption 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.75 5.75 5.75 6.00 6.00 6.00 Democracy Score 5.07 5.14 4.96 4.89 4.82 4.86 4.86 4.89 4.93 4.93 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. If consensus cannot be reached, Freedom House is responsible for the final ratings. The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Government Accountability in Moldova
    Promoting Government Accountability in Moldova A project supported by the National Endowment for Democracy and implemented by Business News Service /Mold-Street.com during 1 May 2017 - 31 May 2018 The version in English 1 Project coordinator: Eugeniu Rîbca All rights reserved Mold-Street.com © 2 Instead of Pay Raise, Government Prepares Pay Optimization in Public Area Public sector employees – especially in the education area – continue to nourish hopes for a perceptible pay raise. This expectation however is unlikely this year, because the salary bill for teachers and lecturers is al- ready too expensive, the Government says. Earlier protests with education employees forced the Govern- ment to pass a number of decisions regarding the remuneration improvements. One of decisions envisages a salary increase for education staff in public institutions and for other employees based on the Common Tar- iff Network. Pay raise promises Starting May 1, 2017, the public education staff in Moldova will receive a monthly raise of 100 lei (5$) and from September they will get a 10% raise, the Labor and Social Protection Ministry announced. At the same time, current legislation and the 2016 economic performance would allow to raise teachers’ salaries by 5.3% while the Government would be looking for additional funding during the amendment of the 2017 budget. On the other hand, the Government admits in the Additional Memorandum on Economic and Financial Poli- cies with the IMF that it is short of resources to increases the public spending, including salaries. Salary expenses are “too large” "On the expense side the salary expenses in the public sector exceed the targets that have been established in the Memorandum with the International Monetary Fund which was signed on October 24, 2016," the execu- tive said in a press release.
    [Show full text]
  • Moldova Partnerships for Sustainable Civil Society Annual Report No
    Moldova Partnerships for Sustainable Civil Society Funding provided by United States Agency for International Development Cooperative Agreement AID-117-A-14-00002 Annual Report No: 3 October 1, 2015 – September 30, 2016 October 28, 2016 Chisinau, Republic of Moldova Submitted to: Lucia Martinenco Agreement Officer’s Representative USAID/Regional Mission in Moldova 57/1, Banulescu-Bodoni str. Chisinau, Moldova MD 2005 [email protected] This report was prepared with funds provided by the U.S. Agency for International Development under Cooperative Agreement AID-117-A-14-00002. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for International Development. Annual Progress Report No. 3: October 1, 2015 – September 30, 2016 1 Moldova Partnerships for Sustainable Civil Society (MPSCS) TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................. 3 I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 4 II. MPSCS KEY ACHIEVEMENTS, YEAR 3 ...................................................................................... 5 OBJECTIVE 1: CSOS MORE EFFECTIVELY REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENCIES ................................................... 5 OBJECTIVE 2: THE INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITIES OF STRATEGIC PARTNERS DEVELOPED ........................................ 6 OBJECTIVE 3: ENABLING ENVIRONMENT MORE CONDUCIVE
    [Show full text]
  • Oligarchs in Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia As Key Obstacles to Reforms Wojciech Konończuk, Denis Cenușa and Kornely Kakachia 24 May 2017
    Understanding the EU’s Association Agreements and Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas with Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia Oligarchs in Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia as key obstacles to reforms Wojciech Konończuk, Denis Cenușa and Kornely Kakachia 24 May 2017 Abstract The paper reviews the role of oligarchs in Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. Oligarchy can be briefly defined as a system of governance in which a small and informal group of people, using their vast economic and financial resources, is able to control a state or exert a major or dominant influence on its policy. The portfolios of economic assets of the major oligarchs of the three countries is described in some detail. The nature of their influence on policy making is further analysed, in particular the disadvantages for the governance of these countries. While these impacts differ in their detail by country, in general terms they tend towards limiting political pluralism, capturing state institutions, corruption, monopolisation, and more broadly the blocking of reform processes. Oligarchs are symptoms rather than causes of weak political institutions. The remedies correspondingly need a wide reach, including institutional capacity building, effective anti-corruption bodies, suitable public funding for political parties, effective competition policy, independence of the judiciary and of the media, supported by many features of the Association Agreements and DCFTAs with the EU. Modern economies will always need major business leaders and enterprises. The challenge is precisely to bring the oligarchs into becoming normal business leaders. Wojciech Konończuk is a senior associate at the Centre for Eastern Studies (OSW) in Warsaw. Denis Cenușa is a researcher and Program Director at Expert-Grup, Chisinau.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Governance Contents
    NO. 20 | OCTOBER – DECEMBER 2018 GOOD GOVERNANCE CONTENTS GOOD GOVERNANCE European institutions are concerned about EUROPEAN INSTITUTIONS ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE the deterioration of democratic standards and the level of corruption in Moldova ................................. 1 DETERIORATION OF DEMOCRATIC STANDARDS AND THE Constitutional Court: Citizens can initiate referendums, LEVEL OF CORRUPTION IN MOLDOVA but only with the consent of the Parliament ........................ 2 Torments of the referendum held on 24 February 2019 ....... 3 The decision-making transparency of the Parliament In the autumn of 2018, the Council of Europe (CoE) and the European Parliament needs improvement .............................................................. 4 have warned Moldovan authorities about the deterioration of democratic standards Barometer of Public Opinion 2018 - poverty and corruption remain among the biggest concerns of Moldovans ............. 5 and the need to ensure the rule of law in Moldova. Three new judges were appointed to the Constitutional Court ................................................. 6 On 11 October 2018, 25 members of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council JUSTICE The SCJ upholds the SCM decision on the dismissal of Europe (PACE) adopted a declaration voicing concern about the deterioration of judge Domnica MANOLE ................................................. 7 New legislation on remuneration in the budgetary sector - of basic democratic standards in the Republic of Moldova: rule of law, democratic how did
    [Show full text]