DOCSLIB.ORG

Policy Number 260 | Incident on the River Thames

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Policy Number 260 | Incident on the River Thames Policy | Procedure Incidents on the River Thames New policy number: 260 Old instruction number: Issue date: 17 November 1993 Reviewed as current: 11 November 2019 Owner: Assistant Commissioner, Operational Policy Assurance Responsible work team: Rescue and ISAR Team Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 3 2 Legislation ............................................................................................................. 4 3 Hazards ................................................................................................................. 4 4 Planning ................................................................................................................. 5 5 Mobilising .............................................................................................................. 8 6 En-route ................................................................................................................. 9 7 On arrival .............................................................................................................. 10 8 Operational procedures ......................................................................................... 11 9 Associated policies ................................................................................................ 16 Appendix 1 - Key point summary – incidents on the River Thames ........................................... 17 Appendix 2 - River Thames grid mobilising scheme ............................................................... 18 Appendix 3 - River Thames operational reconnaissance points (RP) .......................................... 19 Appendix 4 - River Thames operational access points (AP) ...................................................... 23 Appendix 5 - Hazards when operating on the River Thames Sector 1 ........................................ 25 Appendix 6 - Hazards when operating on the River Thames Sector 2 ........................................ 27 Appendix 7 - Hazards when operating on the River Thames Sector 3 ........................................ 29 Appendix 8 - Hazards when operating on the River Thames Sector 4 ........................................ 31 Appendix 9 - Hazards when operating on the River Thames Sector 5 ........................................ 33 Review date: 11 November 2022 Last amended date: 3 February 2021 260 Issue date: 17 November 1993 1 of 42 Appendix 10 - Hazards when operating on the River Thames Sector 6 ...................................... 35 Appendix 11 - Towing methods ......................................................................................... 37 Appendix 12 - Search methodology diagrams ....................................................................... 38 Appendix 13 - Types of vessel ........................................................................................... 40 Document history ........................................................................................................... 41 260 Issue date: 17 November 1993 2 of 42 1 Introduction 1.1 This policy provides guidance for personnel attending operational incidents on the River Thames and its tributaries. 1.2 The tidal Thames is a commercial highway, with the Port of London being one of the busiest ports in the UK, handling over 50 million tonnes of cargo a year. 1.3 The Thames is also the busiest waterway in the UK with 8.5 million passenger journeys being made yearly, with the Transport for London’s (TfL) River Action Plan looking to increase the number of river passengers to 12 million by 2020. 1.4 Use of river services has increased over the past 10 years. This has been driven by a growing number of attractions and developments along the river, as well as substantial investment in services by Transport for London (TfL) and other operators. Organisational roles and responsibilities on the River Thames Maritime Coastguard Agency (MCA) 1.5 Whereas LFB has the responsibility for rescue in all other inland waterways in London, the MCA are the coordinating authority for Search and Rescue (SAR) on the tidal section of the River Thames. 1.6 However, dependent on the type, size, and complexity of an incident the MCA may delegate the function of On Scene Coordinator (OSC) to the most appropriate agency and this includes the LFB. 1.7 The MCA’s area of responsibility stretches from Teddington Lock to Shell Haven Point on the north bank and from Egypt Bay to the Essex Coast on the south bank. 1.8 The MCA’s Thames coordination centre is based at Thames Barrier Navigation Centre in Woolwich, within the PLA London Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) control room. Port of London Authority (PLA) 1.9 Under the Port of London Act 1968 the PLA is the statutory harbour authority for the tidal Thames and has responsibility for navigational safety, information, environment and development. Environmental Agency (EA) 1.10 The EA is the navigational authority for the non-Tidal River Thames from Teddington Lock to St John's Lock, Gloucestershire but has no responsibility for the co-ordination of SAR, which sits with the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). 1.11 Due to respective LFB and MPS capabilities, the responsibility to coordinate initial SAR is likely to be delegated to the LFB on the non-tidal reaches of the River. London Emergency Services Liaison Panel (LESLP) 1.12 The LFB has a designated role on the Thames within the London Emergency Services Liaison Panel (LESLP) response framework. The LFB Fireboat is named as a resource in the LESLP Major Incident Procedural Manual and provides an essential component of a multi-agency response to a declared major incident on, or adjacent to, the River Thames. 260 Issue date: 17 November 1993 3 of 42 2 Legislation 2.1 LFB have core statutory responsibilities, included in legislation, to respond to fires and other emergencies on the River Thames. These can be grouped into two areas: Fires/HAZMAT 2.2 The LFB have a statutory responsibility to respond to fires and other emergencies in accordance with the Fire Rescue Services Act 2004 (FRSA). For further information on fires on the River Thames refer to Policy number 890 – Firefighting in ships and vessels. 2.3 The Fire and Rescue Services (Emergencies) (England) Order 2007 also includes duties for dealing with HAZMAT incidents and rescues from and involving methods of transport, structure and collapsed buildings. Special services 2.4 The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 includes provisions within Section 2 that impose a duty on the Authority from time to time to "assess the risk of an emergency making it necessary or expedient for the [Authority] to perform any of its functions". 2.5 The MCA is the lead authority for maritime incidents under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, and will coordinate the response of other emergency services which may include the LFB. 3 Hazards 3.1 The River Thames presents a range of hazards for personnel attending incidents on or near it. At its lower reaches, the River Thames presents operating conditions that are in a sea environment. These stretches of the river include major shipping, container ports and heavy industry. In the middle reaches there are major commercial and passenger services, focused on tourism and commuter traffic, with the upper reaches being typically associated with residential and leisure use. 3.2 It is essential that personnel understand the generic hazards associated with the marine environment and in particular the River Thames and its tributaries. 3.3 For further information see Policy number 581 - Water rescue and safety when working near, on or in water and for a detailed reference of hazards for specific sectors of the River Thames see appendices 5 -10. 3.4 To assist in identifying specific hazards associated with the River Thames they can be grouped under four headings: (a) Working environment (b) River structures (c) Types of river traffic (d) Fire Working environment • Weather. • Tidal flow. • Undertow. • Depth and clarity of water. 260 Issue date: 17 November 1993 4 of 42 • Pollution/contamination/biological risks. • Mud, silt, roots, weeds and rocks. • Entrapment and/or crush injuries between ships hull and dockside. • Quay-side and river bank conditions (slips, trips, and falls). • Accidental immersion/hypothermia/drowning/fatigue. • Waterborne debris. • Sprains and strains caused by over-reaching, pulling and lifting from unnatural positions. • Sub surface obstructions – anchor chains, electrical cables. • Electrical hazards - overhead power lines, quayside installations. • Inadequate lighting. River structures (bridges/pontoons/piers/weirs/locks) 3.5 Manmade structures can disrupt the flow of water which can cause unpredictable tidal movement, can be dangerous to the personnel and resources on the river and make vessel control more difficult. 3.6 Hazards associated with locks and weirs include fast flowing water, dangerous undercurrents, the lock mechanism, falls from height and access/egress issues. Types of river traffic 3.7 Due to the growing levels and variety of river traffic the risk of collision has increased, The Thames is a busy waterway, used by a variety of vessels, details of which are set out in Appendix 13. Fire Midstream/alongside (defined in Section 7 below) 3.8 For general hazards associated with firefighting operations refer to Policy number 793 - Compartment firefighting. 3.9 Firefighting in ships and vessels introduces a range of additional hazards, for guidance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bus Routes Running Every Day (Black Numbers)
    Richmond Bus & Cycle M&G 26/01/2011 15:32 Page 1 2011 ABCDEFGH . E S E A to Heston Y A L Kew Bridge U O L OAD to W N I N N R KEW N Steam G O K BRENTFORD E RICHMOND R O L Ealing 267 V T G I A Museum BRIDGE E 391 Queen T N Y O U N A S A Orange Tree D R T Charlotte S A G S D O . E R 391 P U U O R T E Theatre D S C H R IN B O W H Hall/R.A.C.C. G 267 IS PAR H OAD R L W A . R L G 65 DE N A G K RO SYON LANE E IC T OLDHAW A Parkshot N E V R S GUNNERSBURY K CHISWICK D W O E D 267 T M D . N R E T Y 111 R O 65 BRIDGE ROAD BATH ROAD B P O . KEW K A H E PARK K GOLDHAWK ROAD W AT D T R D O H E M I W D H A W G R 267 E E H A L A A D LE G L R S H O R L 267 T R T D EY Little E I O O RE D R U HIGH ST ROAD N A Waterman’s R RO 391 TURNHAM L A H37.110 A D P B Green N A O S D Library R D Arts Centre G O GREEN D RICHMOND T H22 281 H37 OAD Kew Green W R E STAMFORD A G School K Richmond C U N STATION I ‘Bell’ Bus Station D DON 65 BROOK Richmond Q L A LON Green L R O B D E U N Theatre E 1 391 S CE A H RAVENSCOURT 1 E H D T E H to Hatton Cross and W LONDON D Main W A O R T HIGH STREET Thornbury A RS R R G S Kew Palace O Falcons PARK Heathrow Airport ISLEWORTH O Gate D O R O to F B Playing T R O D N E H37 A A ROAD H22 .
    [Show full text]
  • Gec Esfid Final
    Gateway Energy Centre UNDERGROUND GGAS PIPELINE AND ASSOCIATED ABOVE GROUND INSTALLATION ENVIRONMENTAAL STATEMENT FURTHER INFORMATION DOCUMENT Prepared by July 2011 CONTENTS Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS PREFACE 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background to the ES FID 1 1.2 Relationship between the ES and ES FID 1 2 PLANNING AND ENERGY POLICY 5 2.1 Overview 5 3 GAS PIPELINE ROUTE AND AGI LOCATION SELECTION 7 3.1 Response to Thurrock Council 7 4 CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND OPERATION 9 4.1 Response to Oikos Storage Ltd (Agent: Adams Hendry) 9 5 LAND USE 10 5.1 Response to Shell (Agent: Jones Lang LeSalle) 10 6 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL 18 6.1 Response to Thurrock Council 18 7 LAND USE / GEOLOGY, HYDROLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY 24 7.1 Response to Thurrock Council 24 8 CULTURAL HERITAGE 24 8.1 Response to ECC (Historic Environment Branch) 24 9 INDIRECT / SECONDARY AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS 25 9.1 Response to Thurrock Council 25 9.2 Update to the March 2011 ES Section 18 (Indirect / Secondary and Cumulative Impacts) 27 APPENDIX A REPRESENTATIONS MADE BY THRID PARTIES TO TTGDC APPENDIX B UPDATES TO MARCH 2011 ES SECTIONS 2 AND 3 APPENDIX C UPDATE TO MARCH 2011 ES SECTION 6 APPENDIX D SUBSTITUTION OF MARCH 2011 ES SECTION 15 APPENDIX E UPDATE TO MARCH 2011 ES SECTION 18 57 GEC Underground Gas Pipeline and Associated Above Ground Installation July 2011 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 3LPE 3 layer polyethylene AC Alternating Current ACC Air Cooled Condenser AGI Above Ground Installation AOD Above Ordnance Datum AUT Automatic Ultrasonic Testing BAP Biodiversity Action Plan BP British
    [Show full text]
  • The Expertise Behind the World's Water and Wastewater Solutions
    The expertise behind the world’S water and wastewater solutionS 60 major cases from around the world Only 2,5 percent of the world’s total water supply is freshwater. Out of that 2,5 percent, 70 percent is contained in glaciers, 29 percent is held in underground aquifers, while freshwater lakes, rivers and streams make up one percent. 2| Innovation throughout the cycle of water Clean water for everyone –that’s our goal. In aworld A small number of companies are developing the of ever growing challenges, ITT delivers innovative necessary range of solutions and applications solutions throughout the cycle of water. We are the knowledge that cover the entire cycle of water use world’s largest provider of water and wastewater and reuse. ITT is at the forefront of this transition. treatment solutions. And we are a leading provider of pumps and related technologies for aindustrial, SETTING THE INDUSTRY STANDARD commercial and municipal customers. Operating in some 140 countries, we manufacture and market a comprehensive range of water and Organizations facing challenging water issues are drainage pumps, units for primary, secondary and increasingly turning to experts who have the breadth tertiary treatment, and products for treating water of capability to own and resolve such challenges. through biological, filtering and disinfection These experts employ holistic solutions that incorporate processes. We also maintain the industry’s most a range of skills encompassing both technical and extensive sales and after-sales organization, with 70 commercial innovation. sales companies operating both locally and globally. CONTENT Water Treatment......................................................................7 Wastewater Treatment ..........................................................19 Water & Wastewater Transport ..............................................31 |3 Every week an estimated 42,000 people die from diseases related to low-quality drinking water and lack of sanitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Thurrock
    Draft recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Thurrock May 2001 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND The Local Government Commission for England is an independent body set up by Parliament. Our task is to review and make recommendations to the Government on whether there should be changes to local authorities’ electoral arrangements. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke CBE (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) We are statutorily required to review periodically the electoral arrangements – such as the number of councillors representing electors in each area and the number and boundaries of wards and electoral divisions – of every principal local authority in England. In broad terms our objective is to ensure that the number of electors represented by each councillor in an area is as nearly as possible the same, taking into account local circumstances. We can recommend changes to ward boundaries, and the number of councillors and ward names. We can also make recommendations for change to the electoral arrangements of parish councils in the borough. © Crown Copyright 2001 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper.
    [Show full text]
  • 1994 Appendices
    APPENDICES Footnotes I Chronology of Evolving Architecture/Design II List of Consultees III Principal Issues Raised by Consultations IV Principal Contacts V Summary List of Strategic Policies VI List of Illustrations VII APPENDIX I: FOOTNOTES 1 London Planning Advisory Committee : 1993 Draft Advice on Strategic Planning Guidance for London (para. 8.14) 2 Royal Fine Art Commission: Thames Connections Exhibition (May 1991) 3 Judy Hillman: A New Look for London (Royal Fine Art Commission 1988) ISBN 0 11 752135 3 4 Kim Wilkie Environmental Design: Landscape Strategy for the Thames between Hampton Court and Kew: Elements for the Project Brief (July 1992) Kim Wilkie Environmental Design: Report on Consultation (July 1992) 5 Sherban Cantacuzino Eddington Charitable Trust Johnny Van Haeften Mick Jagger Richard Lester Prince and Princess Rupert Loewenstein 6 David Lowenthal: The Historic Landscape Reconsidered (George Washington Univ. 1990) 7 English Nature: Strategy for the 1990s: Natural Areas (1993) 8 Richmond Council demolition of Devonshire Lodge at the foot of Richmond Hill in 1960s 9 Countryside Commission, English Heritage, English Nature: Conservation Issues in Strategic Plans (August 1993) ISBN 0 86170 383 9 10 Greater London Council, Department of Transportation and Development: Thames-side Guidelines, An Environmental Handbook for London’s River (March 1986) 11 London Ecology Unit A Nature Conservation Strategy for London (Ecology Handbook 4) Nature Conservation in Hounslow (Ecology Handbook 15) 1990 Nature Conservation in Kingston
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Tideway (PDF)
    BASIC PRINCIPLES OF TIDEWAY NAVIGATION A chart to accompany The Tideway Code: A Code of Practice for rowing and paddling on the Tidal Thames > Upper Tideway Code Area (Special navigation rules) Col Regs (Starboard navigation rule) With the tidal stream: Against either tidal stream (working the slacks): Regardless of the tidal stream: PEED S Z H O G N ABOVE WANDSWORTH BRIDGE Outbound or Inbound stay as close to the I Outbound on the EBB – stay in the Fairway on the Starboard Use the Inshore Zone staying as close to the bank E H H High Speed for CoC vessels only E I G N Starboard (right-hand/bow side) bank as is safe and H (right-hand/bow) side as is safe and inside any navigation buoys O All other vessels 12 knot limit HS Z S P D E Inbound on the FLOOD – stay in the Fairway on the Starboard Only cross the river at the designated Crossing Zones out of the Fairway where possible. Go inside/under E piers where water levels allow and it is safe to do so (right-hand/bow) side Or at a Local Crossing if you are returning to a boat In the Fairway, do not stop in a Crossing Zone. Only boats house on the opposite bank to the Inshore Zone All small boats must inform London VTS if they waiting to cross the Fairway should stop near a crossing Chelsea are afloat below Wandsworth Bridge after dark reach CADOGAN (Hammersmith All small boats are advised to inform London PIER Crossings) BATTERSEA DOVE W AY F A I R LTU PIER VTS before navigating below Wandsworth SON ROAD BRIDGE CHELSEA FSC HAMMERSMITH KEW ‘STONE’ AKN Bridge during daylight hours BATTERSEA
    [Show full text]
  • Written Statement of the 2005 UDP (Pdf, 2577KB)
    IMPORTANT NOTE: The Unitary Development Plan (UDP) is gradually being replaced by the Local Development Framework. Check the planning policy pages on the Council’s website (http://www.richmond.gov.uk/planning_guidance_and_policies.htm) for details of when policies and proposal sites have been superseded. This copy of the original UDP First Review 2005 replicates the text of the written statement for information (issued February 2012). Images and maps are not included. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Planning Policy and Design: 2nd Floor Civic Centre, York Street, Twickenham, TW1 3BZ Telephone: 020 8891 7117 Email: [email protected] LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND UPON THAMES UNITARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN: FIRST REVIEW Adopted 1 March 2005 WRITTEN STATEMENT Prepared in accordance with section 13 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 27 of the Planning and Compensation Act 1991 FOREWORD The Unitary Development Plan First Review is the land use plan for the Borough, and seeks, through its policies and proposals, to guide development, as well as to protect and enhance the Borough’s special environment, for present and future generations. The Plan is set in the context of national and regional planning guidance, but the policies are tailored for this Borough’s unique environment, characterised by its well- loved Royal Parks large open spaces, many historic buildings and conservation areas, attractive town centres and residential areas and extensive River Thames frontage. New developments must recognise and enhance this special character. A key initiative of the Council is its Civic Pride programme, which is intended to make Richmond upon Thames the safest, cleanest and greenest Borough in London.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Submission Development Management Plan and Proposal Map Review and Changes
    Local Development Framework Pre-Submission Development Management Plan Proposal Map Review & Changes for consultation 29th January – 12th March 2010 Based Upon Ordnance Survey data. © Crown copyright. All rights reserved 100019441 [2006]. If you need this document in Braille, large print, audio tape, or another language, please contact us on 020 8891 7322 or minicom 020 8831 6001 Albanian Arabic Bengali Farsi Gujarati Punjabi Urdu Development Management DPD Review of designations Contents 1 Purpose of this document 4 2 Review of designations 4 2.1 Green Belt and Major Developed site in the Green Belt 4 2.2 Metropolitan Open Land 5 2.3 Public Open Space 6 2.4 Other Open Land of Townscape Importance 8 2.5 Thames Policy Area 13 2.6 Areas in Need of Tree Planting 13 2.7 Views and Vistas 13 2.8 Town Centre boundaries and Areas of Mixed Use 14 2.9 Retail Frontages 14 3 Development Management DPD Review of designations 1 Purpose of this document The Council is currently working on the Local Development Framework (LDF), which will replace the Unitary Development Plan (UDP) with a “folder” of documents. This folder of documents includes the adopted Core Strategy and will include further Development Plan Documents (DPDs), such as this Development Management Development Plan Document (DMDPD) and the Site Allocations DPD. The DMDPD will build on the Core Strategy and will include more detailed local policies for the management of development. It will provide a detailed set of policies, which will be designed to contribute to achieving the LDF’s vision, Core Strategy objectives and its core policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Learning Providers in the Borough
    Providers of Outdoor Learning in Richmond Environmental, Friends of Parks and Residents Groups Environment Trust Website: www.environmenttrust.co.uk Email: [email protected] Phone: 020 8891 5455 Contact: Stephen James Events are advertised on http://www.environmenttrust.co.uk/whats-on Friends of Barnes Common Website: www.barnescommon.org.uk Email: [email protected] Phone: 07855 548 404 Contact: Sharon Morgan Events are advertised on www.barnescommon.org.uk/learning Friends of Bushy and Home Parks Website: www.fbhp.org.uk Email: [email protected] Events are advertised on www.fbhp.org.uk/walksandtalks Green Corridor Land based horticultural qualifications for young people aged 14-35. Website: www.greencorridor.org.uk Email: [email protected] Phone: 01403 713 567 Contact: Julie Docking Updated March 2016 Friends of the River Crane Environment (FORCE) Website: www.force.org.uk Email: [email protected] For walks and talks, community learning, and outdoor learning for schools in sites in the lower Crane Valley see http://e-voice.org.uk/force/calendar/view Friends of Carlisle Park Website: http://e-voice.org.uk/friendsofcarlislepark/ Ham United Group Website: www.hamunitedgroup.org.uk Email: [email protected] Phone: 020 8940 2941 Contact: Penny Frost River Thames Boat Project Educational, therapeutic and recreational cruises and activities on the River Thames. Website: www.thamesboatproject.org Email: [email protected] Phone: 020 8940 3509 Contact: Pippa Thames Explorer Trust Website: www.thames-explorer.org.uk Email: [email protected] Phone: 020 8742 0057 Contact: Lorraine Conterio or Simon Clarke Summer playscheme - www.thames-explorer.org.uk/families/summer-playscheme Foreshore walks - www.thames-explorer.org.uk/foreshore-walks/ YMCA London South West Website: www.ymcalsw.org Contact: Myke Catterall Updated March 2016 Thames Young Mariners Thames Young Mariners in Ham offer outdoor learning opportunities for schools, youth groups, families and adults all year round including day and residential visits.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014:Layout 2 5/3/14 19:22 Page 1 Port of London Authority Handbook 2014 the Port of Tilbury London’S Link to World Trade
    PLA final cover 2014:Layout 2 5/3/14 19:22 Page 1 Port of London Authority Handbook 2014 The Port of Tilbury London’s link to world trade • Closest deepwater port to London • Serving huge South East UK market • Britain’s greenest port – a leader on environmental issues • A truly multimodal port with excellent rail and road links • Skilled workforce handling diverse commodities • Multi-million pound investments – creating jobs and growth Constantly adapting to changing demands... Please contact Port of Tilbury on: 01375 852200 | Port of Tilbury London Ltd, Leslie Ford House, Tilbury Freeport, Tilbury, Essex, RM18 7EH | www.forthports.co.uk Published in association with The Port of London Authority by Compass Publications Ltd Publisher James P Moriarty Sales Director Andy Bullen Editorial Felicity Landon Photography Andy Wallace Samuel Ashfield Ford Motor Company Nick Strugnell Gavin Parsons Rob Powell Dan Harwood Alistair Gale Book Design Pearce Marchbank Production Editor Linda Roast Cartographer Lee Ash Print Swallowtail Print The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the publisher, the Port of London Authority, nor any other organisation associated with this publication. No liability can be accepted for inaccuraciesof any description, although the publishers would be pleased to receive amendments for possible inclusion in future editions. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying or scanning, without the prior permission of the publishers. Such written permission must also be obtained before any part of the publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature. March 2014 ISSN 1353-7482 ©2014 Compass Publications Ltd COMPASS31st Edition PUBLICATIONS LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Call for Sites All Responses Received
    Official All responses received to the Call for Sites https://www.richmond.gov.uk/services/planning/planning_policy/local_plan/new_local_plan_direction_of_travel_engagement https://haveyoursay.citizenspace.com/richmondecs/call-20/ Consultation from 24 February until 5 April 2020 Published by LBRuT November 2020 Please note, the responses below are exactly as received from the respondents and have not been edited by the Council. They are not alphabetically ordered or in any other order of priority. The schedule shows where any personal information within responses relating to contact details, particularly full address data, has been removed stating e.g. [personal details removed for data protection] or shown as black rectangles in the appendices. Appendices have been made available separately where due to the length or nature of responses they could not be captured within the main Schedule. The officer references added are shown in the Schedule as [See Appendix….] Respondent Respondent Name / Organisation Name / Organisation reference no. reference no. 2. CBRE on behalf of LGC Teddington 73. Pegasus Group on behalf of Sheen Lane Developments 3. Katie Parsons, Historic England 74. Savills on behalf of Thames Water 8. Sharon Jenkins, Natural England 75 (a) and (b) David Taylor 11. Surrey County Council 76. Henry Clive 13. Heather Archer, Highways England 77 Jennifer Farrell and Batu Lortkipanidze 19. DP9 Ltd on behalf of London Square Developments 78. Graham Green Lucy Wakelin, Transport for London Commercial 79. Max Hampton 21. Development 80. Lira Cabatbat 22. Jimmy Wallace, Richmond Athletic Association 81. Dawn Roads 24. Paul Velluet 82. Campbell Brown 26. Hannah Lukacs 83. Chris O’Rourke Tim Catchpole on behalf of the Mortlake with East 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Draft Version June 2006)
    (Internal Draft Version June 2006) THURROCK LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (LDF) SITE SPECIFIC ALLOCATIONS AND POLICIES “ISSUES AND OPTIONS” DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOCUMENT [DPD] INFORMAL CONSULTATION DRAFT CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. STRATEGIC & POLICY CONTEXT 4 3. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BOROUGH 6 4. KEY PRINCIPLES 7 5. RELATIONSHIP WITH CORE STRATEGY VISION, 7 OBJECTIVES & ISSUES 6. SITE SPECIFIC PROVISIONS 8 7. MONITORING & IMPLEMENTATION 19 8. NEXT STEPS 19 APPENDICES 20 GLOSSARY OF TERMS REFERENCE LIST INTERNAL DRAFT VERSION JUNE 2006 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 We would like to get your views on future development and planning of Thurrock to 2021. A new system of “Spatial Planning” has been introduced that goes beyond traditional land-use planning and seeks to integrate the various uses of land with the various activities that people use land for. The new spatial plans must involve wider community consultation and involvement and be based on principles of sustainable development. 1.2 The main over-arching document within the LDF portfolio is the Core Strategy. This sets out the vision, objectives and strategy for the development of the whole area of the borough. The Site Specific Allocations and Policies is very important as it underpins the delivery of the Core Strategy. It enables the public to be consulted on the various specific site proposals that will guide development in accordance with the Core Strategy. 1.3 Many policies in the plans will be implemented through the day-to-day control of development through consideration of planning applications. This document also looks at the range of such Development Control policies that might be needed.
    [Show full text]