Your Role in Changing Hearts and Minds for Science Mary Woolley, President & CEO, Research!America
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Your Role in Changing Hearts and Minds for Science Mary Woolley, President & CEO, Research!America Jan. 21, 2016 Association of Medical School Microbiology and Immunology Chairs (AMSMIC) Chairs Annual Meeting - Antigua, Guatemala Advocacy works! • Now it’s time to turn last year’s ‘moment’ for research into a movement • Advocates for each sector working to achieve medical progress must stand shoulder-to- shoulder for research in 2016 • Scientists must be more visible and accountable Research!America: 27 Years of Putting Research on the Public Agenda • Nonprofit alliance with member organizations drawn from academia, business, patient organizations and scientific societies representing more than 125 million Americans • Distinguished, all-volunteer board includes former elected and appointed officials, media and public relations leaders, and leaders from alliance member organizations • Three ‘sister’ organizations in Canada, Australia and Sweden Research!America Goals • Achieve funding for research at the level of scientific opportunity • Advocate a policy climate that stimulates rather than impedes research and development • Empower members of the stakeholder community to engage non-scientists & advocate for research • Ensure that the public hears about research benefits and success stories: Research must not become invisible! Current Research!America Advocacy Agenda • Secure robust increases for NIH, FDA, CDC, AHRQ and NSF in FY17 • Protect health services research (HSR) and social, behavioral, economic (SBE) research from ongoing threats st • Ensure that a conferenced 21 Century Cures Act/Senate Innovation Initiative, including supplemental funds for NIH and FDA, is signed into law this year • Work for repeal of the Medical device tax • Build champions for research in Congress • Build champions for research among candidates for federal office A Challenge: Pass the Starbucks Test Do You Know These People? Do These People Know You? Congressional Leadership, 114th Congress House Leadership Senate Leadership Rep. Paul Rep. Kevin Rep. Nancy Sen. Mitch Sen. John Ryan McCarthy Pelosi McConnell (R-KY) Cornyn (R-TX) (R-WI) (R-CA) (D-CA) Majority Leader Majority Whip Speaker Majority Leader Minority Leader Sen. Dick Durbin Sen. Harry (D-IL) Reid Rep. Steve Rep. Steny Minority Whip Scalise Hoyer (D-NV) (R-LA) (D-MD) Minority Leader Majority Whip Minority Whip HELP and E&C Committee Leadership, 114th Congress Health, Education, Labor and Energy and Commerce Pension Committee Leadership Committee Leadership Sen. Lamar Sen. Patty Murray Rep. Fred Rep. Frank Pallone Alexander (D-WA), Ranking Upton (D-NJ), Ranking (R-TN), Chair Member (R-MI), Chair Member Appropriations Leadership, 114th Congress Sen. Thad Cochran Sen. Barbara Mikulski Rep. Hal Rogers Rep. Nita Lowey (R-MS), Chair, (D-MD), Vice Chair, (R-KY), Chair, (D-NY), Ranking Member, Senate Appropriations Senate Appropriations House Appropriations House Appropriations Committee Committee Committee Committee Labor-HHS Appropriations Subcommittee Leadership Sen. Roy Blunt Sen. Patty Rep. Tom Cole Rep. Rosa (R-MI), Chair Murray (R-OK), Chair DeLauro (D-WA), (D-CT), Ranking Ranking Member Member NIH Buildings Named for Policymakers Democrats: 7 Republicans: 5 Warren Grant Magnuson (D, WA) Lowell P. Weicker, Jr. (R, CN) •U.S. Rep (1937-1944) •U.S. Representative (1969-1971) •U.S. Senator (1944-1981) •U.S. Senator (1971-1989) •Connecticut Governor (1991-1995) Lawton Chiles (D, FL) •U.S. Senator (1971-1989) Mark Hatfield (R, OR) •Florida Governor (1991-1998) •Oregon Governor (1959-1967) •U.S. Senator (1967-1997) Claude Denson Pepper (D, FL) •U.S. Senator (1936-1951) C.W. Bill Young (R, FL) •U.S. Representative (1963-1989) •U.S. Representative (1971-2013) Joseph Lister Hill (D, AL) John Edward Porter (R, IL) •U.S. Representative (1923-1938) •U.S. Representative (1980-2001) •U.S. Senator (1938-1969) Silvio O. Conte (R, MA) Dale Bumpers (D, AR) •U.S. Representative (1959-1991) •Arkansas Governor (1971-1975) •U.S. Senator (1975-1999) *Plaza named for Paul G. Rogers William Natcher (D, KY) (D, FL, U.S. Representative •U.S. Representative (1953-1994) 1955-1979) Louis Stokes (D, OH) •U.S. Representative (1969-1999) “Scientists must take off their lab coats and engage the people of their communities and states. They must be willing to defend and spread the good news about science.” Science magazine editorial, June 2014 Research!America Chair, Former Congressman John Edward Porter Environment for Advocacy • Election year politics • Heightened public and policy-maker demand for transparency and accountability • Importance of job creation, economic growth and global competitiveness • Health care issues on front burner, especially cost and access issues • Scientists are not speaking out • Everyone is looking for solutions to what ails us Transparency and Accountability “Scientists who profess agreement with transparency only when it is on their terms are really not for transparency at all. The public should be alarmed.” Confusing Headlines in the Media Science in Real Time • People are understandably confused by the three steps forward/two steps back dynamic process of science. • By standing back or failing to engage, researchers and advocates aren’t helping resolve public confusion. Healthy skepticism is a good thing in science and in public discourse! • Public support for science is at stake. “…public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment, nothing can fail; without it nothing can succeed.” President Abraham Lincoln Research!America Surveys • Commissioning public opinion surveys on research issues for 22 years: • National Surveys • State-Based Surveys • Issue-Specific Surveys • Telephone (random-digit dialing) surveys are conducted with a sample size of 800-1000 adults (age 18+) and a maximum theoretical sampling error of +/- 3.5%. Data are demographically representative of adult U.S. residents (state or national). • Online surveys are conducted with a sample size of 1000-2000 adults and sampling error of +/-3.1%. The data are weighted in two stages to ensure accurate representation of the U.S. adult population. Only One Third Say U.S. Will Be a World Leader in Science in 2020 In your view, which of the following will be considered the number one world leader in science and technology in the year 2020? Source: A Research!America poll of U.S. adults conducted in partnership with Zogby Analytics in August 2014. Important for U.S. to Lead in Research How important do you think it is that the U.S. is a global leader in medical, health and scientific research? 11% 3% 6% Very Important Somewhat Important 47% Not Too Important Not At All Important Not Sure 33% Source: A Research!America poll of U.S. adults conducted in partnership with Zogby Analytics in September 2015. Strong Majority Agree Basic Science Should be Supported Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? “Even if it brings no immediate benefits, basic scientific research that advances the frontiers of knowledge is necessary and should be supported by the federal government.” 15% 24% Strongly agree 4% Somewhat agree 11% Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Not sure 46% Source: A Research!America poll of U.S. adults conducted in partnership with Zogby Analytics in January 2015. Most Believe Government Should Prioritize STEM Education, Careers Do you agree or disagree that the federal government should assign a higher priority to improving education focused on science, technology, engineering and mathematics and careers in those fields? 15% Strongly agree 35% 4% Somewhat agree 8% Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Not sure 38% Source: A Research!America poll of U.S. adults conducted in partnership with Zogby Analytics in January 2014. Public Policies Should be Based on Science Do you agree or disagree with following statement -- Public policies should be based on the best available science. 10% 3% 10% Strongly Agree 38% Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know 39% Source: A Research!America and ScienceDebate.org poll of U.S. adults conducted in partnership with Zogby Analytics in September 2015. Important for Elected Officials to Listen to Scientists How important is it that elected officials at all levels listen to advice from scientists? Source: A Research!America poll of U.S. adults conducted in partnership with Zogby Analytics in January 2015. Candidates Should Have a Basic Understanding of Science How important do you think it is that candidates for President and Congress have a basic understanding of the science informing public policy issues? 2% 8% 3% Very Important Somewhat Important 28% Not Very Important Not Important At All 59% Not Sure Source: A Research!America and ScienceDebate.org poll of U.S. adults conducted in partnership with Zogby Analytics in September 2015. Presidential Candidates Should Participate in a Debate on Science The presidential candidates should participate in a debate to discuss key science-based challenges facing the United States, such as healthcare, climate change, energy, education, innovation and the economy. 5% 2% 7% Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree 38% 48% Strongly Disagree Don't Know Source: A Research!America and ScienceDebate.org poll of U.S. adults conducted in partnership with Zogby Analytics in September 2015. Few Are Very Well Informed of the Positions of Candidates on Science How well informed are you of the positions of current candidates for President of the United States about public policies and public funding for science and innovation?