DOCSLIB.ORG

HQ-2017-1193 Final Newburgh, NY.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HQ-2017-1193 Final Newburgh, NY.Pdf Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Safety Accident and Analysis Branch Accident Investigation Report HQ-2017-1193 CSX Transportation (CSX) Newburgh, NY March 7, 2017 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report, including this one, made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. U.S. Department of Transportation FRA File #HQ-2017-1193 Federal Railroad Administration FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT SYNOPSIS Synopsis On March 7, 2017, at 3:11 p.m., CSX Transportation (CSX) Freight Train Q40907, consisting of 77 mixed freight cars and 3 locomotives, was traveling southward on single main track in traffic control system territory and collided with a man lift at River Road in Newburgh, New York. The train derailed 3 locomotives and the 20 head cars at a highway-rail grade crossing off River Road (also known as “Shipyard Crossing”). The locomotives came to rest perpendicular to River Road, blocking the road. One locomotive’s fuel tank was ripped open spilling 4,660 gallons of diesel fuel. Twenty cars derailed including 7 tank cars carrying hazardous material. There was no hazmat release. The accident occurred near Newburgh, at Milepost QR 55.90, on the River Line Subdivision. The Operator exited the man lift before impact and was not injured. The man lift was destroyed in the collision. Equipment from the collision struck stationary maintenance-of-way (MOW) equipment located on an adjacent siding. The track crew was waiting to receive track authority at the time of the derailment. The tamper and a ballast regulator were also destroyed in the accident. Two MOW employees occupying that equipment received non-life-threatening injuries and were taken to a local hospital for treatment. The train crew was transported to a local hospital for treatment and later released. Damages to Train Q40907 equipment was reported to be $525,861. Track, Signal, Way, and Structure damage was reported as $1,343,081. The damage to the standing tamper was reported as $850,000 and the damage to the standing ballast regulator was reported as $330,000. Total railroad damage for this accident was estimated at $3,048,942. The man lift was destroyed and the cost of replacement was estimated at $120,000. At the time of the incident, the weather was overcast with a temperature of 52 °F with a slight breeze. The probable cause of this accident was highway user misjudgment under normal weather and traffic conditions (M303). Page 1 U.S. Department of Transportation FRA File #HQ-2017-1193 Federal Railroad Administration FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT TRAIN SUMMARY 1. Name of Railroad Operating Train #1 1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. CSX Transportation CSX 000167261 2. Name of Railroad Operating Train #2 2a. Alphabetic Code 2b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. CSX Transportation CSX 000167261` 3. Name of Railroad Operating Train #3 3a. Alphabetic Code 3b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. CSX Transportation CSX 000167261` GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance 1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. CSX Transportation CSX 000167261` 2. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing Identification Number 3. Date of Accident/Incident 4. Time of Accident/Incident 507133W 3/7/2017 3:11 PM 5. Type of Accident/Incident Hwy-Rail Crossing 6. Cars Carrying 7. HAZMAT Cars 8. Cars Releasing 9. People 10. Subdivision HAZMAT 19 Damaged/Derailed 7 HAZMAT 0 Evacuated 0 River 11. Nearest City/Town 12. Milepost (to nearest tenth) 13. State Abbr. 14. County Newburgh QR55.9 NY ORANGE 15. Temperature (F) 16. Visibility 17. Weather 18. Type of Track 52ࡈ F Day Cloudy Main 19. Track Name/Number 20. FRA Track Class 21. Annual Track Density 22. Time Table Direction (gross tons in millions) Single Main Freight Trains-60, Passenger Trains-8065 West Page 2 U.S. Department of Transportation FRA File #HQ-2017-1193 Federal Railroad Administration FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT OPERATING TRAIN #1 1. Type of Equipment Consist: 2. Was Equipment Attended? 3. Train Number/Symbol Freight Train Yes Q40907 4. Speed (recorded speed, Code 5. Trailing Tons (gross 6a. Remotely Controlled Locomotive? Code if available) excluding power units) 0 = Not a remotely controlled operation 1 = Remote control portable transmitter R - Recorded 31.0 MPH 2 = Remote control tower operation E - Estimated R 6093 3 = Remote control portable transmitter - more than one remote control transmitter 0 6. Type of Territory Signalization: Signaled Method of Operation/Authority for Movement: Signal Indication Supplemental/Adjunct Codes: Q 7. Principal Car/Unit a. Initial and Number b. Position in Train c. Loaded (yes/no) 8. If railroad employee(s) tested for Alcohol Drugs drug/alcohol use, enter the (1) First Involved number that were positive in the (derailed, struck, etc.) CSXT5281 1 yes appropriate box (2) Causing (if 9. Was this consist transporting passengers? mechanical, cause reported) No 10. Locomotive Units a. Head Mid Train Rear End 11. Cars Loaded Empty (Exclude EMU, End (Include EMU, DMU, and Cab b. c. d. e. DMU, and Cab a. b. c. d. e. Car Locomotives.) Manual Remote Manual Remote Car Locomotives.) Freight Pass. Freight Pass. Caboose (1) Total in Equipment (1) Total in Train 30000Consist 3803900 (2) Total Derailed 30000(2) Total Derailed 19010 0 12. Equipment Damage This Consist 13. Track, Signal, Way & Structure Damage 525861 1343081 14. Primary Cause Code M303 - Highway user misjudgment under normal weather and traffic conditions 15. Contributing Cause Code Number of Crew Members Length of Time on Duty 16. Engineers/Operators 17. Firemen 18. Conductors 19. Brakemen 20. Engineer/Operator 21. Conductor 1010Hrs: 5 Mins: 41541Hrs: Mins: Casualties to: 22. Railroad 23. Train Passengers 24. Others 25. EOT Device? 26. Was EOT Device Properly Armed? Employees Yes Yes Fatal 0 0 0 27. Caboose Occupied by Crew? Nonfatal 2 0 0 N/A 28. Latitude 29. Longitude 41.489401000 -74.009238000 Page 3 U.S. Department of Transportation FRA File #HQ-2017-1193 Federal Railroad Administration FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT OPERATING TRAIN #2 1. Type of Equipment Consist: 2. Was Equipment Attended? 3. Train Number/Symbol Spec. MoW Equip. Yes MT5410 4. Speed (recorded speed, Code 5. Trailing Tons (gross 6a. Remotely Controlled Locomotive? Code if available) excluding power units) 0 = Not a remotely controlled operation 1 = Remote control portable transmitter R - Recorded 0.0 MPH 2 = Remote control tower operation E - Estimated E 3 = Remote control portable transmitter - more than one remote control transmitter 0 6. Type of Territory Signalization: Not Signaled Method of Operation/Authority for Movement: Supplemental/Adjunct Codes: 7. Principal Car/Unit a. Initial and Number b. Position in Train c. Loaded (yes/no) 8. If railroad employee(s) tested for Alcohol Drugs drug/alcohol use, enter the (1) First Involved number that were positive in the (derailed, struck, etc.) MT5410 1 yes appropriate box (2) Causing (if 9. Was this consist transporting passengers? mechanical, cause reported) No 10. Locomotive Units a. Head Mid Train Rear End 11. Cars Loaded Empty (Exclude EMU, End (Include EMU, DMU, and Cab b. c. d. e. DMU, and Cab a. b. c. d. e. Car Locomotives.) Manual Remote Manual Remote Car Locomotives.) Freight Pass. Freight Pass. Caboose (1) Total in Equipment (1) Total in Train Consist 1 (2) Total Derailed (2) Total Derailed 1 12. Equipment Damage This Consist 13. Track, Signal, Way & Structure Damage 850000 14. Primary Cause Code M303 - Highway user misjudgment under normal weather and traffic conditions 15. Contributing Cause Code Number of Crew Members Length of Time on Duty 16. Engineers/Operators 17. Firemen 18. Conductors 19. Brakemen 20. Engineer/Operator 21. Conductor 1000Hrs: 0 Mins: 0 Hrs: Mins: Casualties to: 22. Railroad 23. Train Passengers 24. Others 25. EOT Device? 26. Was EOT Device Properly Armed? Employees N/A Fatal 0 0 0 27. Caboose Occupied by Crew? Nonfatal 1 0 0 28. Latitude 29. Longitude 41.489401000 -74.009238000 Page 4 U.S. Department of Transportation FRA File #HQ-2017-1193 Federal Railroad Administration FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT OPERATING TRAIN #3 1. Type of Equipment Consist: 2. Was Equipment Attended? 3. Train Number/Symbol Spec. MoW Equip. Yes BR201318 4. Speed (recorded speed, Code 5. Trailing Tons (gross 6a. Remotely Controlled Locomotive? Code if available) excluding power units) 0 = Not a remotely controlled operation 1 = Remote control portable transmitter R - Recorded 0.0 MPH 2 = Remote control tower operation E - Estimated E 3 = Remote control portable transmitter - more than one remote control transmitter 0 6. Type of Territory Signalization: Not Signaled Method of Operation/Authority for Movement: Supplemental/Adjunct Codes: 7. Principal Car/Unit a. Initial and Number b. Position in Train c. Loaded (yes/no) 8. If railroad employee(s) tested for Alcohol Drugs drug/alcohol use, enter the (1) First Involved number that were positive in the (derailed, struck, etc.) BR201318 1 yes appropriate box (2) Causing (if 9. Was this consist transporting passengers? mechanical, cause reported) N/A 10. Locomotive Units a. Head Mid Train Rear End 11. Cars Loaded Empty (Exclude EMU, End (Include EMU, DMU, and Cab b. c. d. e. DMU, and Cab a. b. c. d. e. Car Locomotives.) Manual Remote Manual Remote Car Locomotives.) Freight Pass. Freight Pass. Caboose (1) Total in Equipment (1) Total in Train Consist 1 (2) Total Derailed (2) Total Derailed 1 12. Equipment Damage This Consist 13. Track, Signal, Way & Structure Damage 330000 14. Primary Cause Code M303 - Highway user misjudgment under normal weather and traffic conditions 15.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Onechundrecl Rjcarr Ofrailroading
    189,6 '''19126 OnecHundrecl Rjcarr ofRailroading By CHARLES FREDERICK CARTER Author of "When Railroads Were New," "Big Railroading," etc.. The New York Central Railroad 0 e4 a 50 50 -0 •;37, .2 —c4 bt aou• C 74-4 ••••;:;. -5 ••• X '7' te: I t 1,4 a P. Le on. E >• ;:rc .c g 7," U E 1-, 100 Y.EAlk_S OF SErk_NTICE Y an interesting coincidence the ses- quicentennial anniversary of the United States and the centennial an- niversary of the New York Central Railroad fall in the same year. Just as the United States was the first true republic to endure and now has be- come the greatest republic the world has ever known, so the New York Central, one of the first important railroads to be established in America, has grown into a great transporta- tion system which, if it is not the foremost in the world, is at least among the very few in the front rank. In the development of the nation the New York Central Railroad has played an essential part. It became the principal highway over which flowed the stream of emigration to people the West, and it has remained the favorite ave- nue of communication between East and West for the descendants of these pioneer emigrants. Keeping pace with the demands upon it for transportation, the New York Central has de- veloped into a railroad system now known as The New York Central Lines, which moves about ten per cent of the aggregate amount of freight hauled by all the railroads as Measured in ton-miles, that is, one ton hauled one mile, 3 NEW Y-0 P.,K_ CENTELAL LIN ES ••• 04101110"r.- Grand Central Terminal, New York City, as it appears from Forty -second Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Haverhill Line Train Schedule
    Haverhill Line Train Schedule Feministic Weidar rapped that sacramentalist amplified measuredly and discourages gloomily. Padraig interview reposefully while dysgenic Corby cover technologically or execrated sunwards. Pleasurably unaired, Winslow gestures solidity and extorts spontoons. Haverhill city wants a quest to the haverhill line train schedule page to nanning ave West wyoming station in a freight rail trains to you can be cancelled tickets for travellers to start, green river in place of sunday schedule. Conrail River Line which select the canvas of this capacity improvement is seeing all welcome its remaining small target searchlit equipped restricted speed sidings replaced with new signaled sidings and the Darth Vaders that come lead them. The haverhill wrestles with the merrimack river in schedules posted here, restaurants and provide the inner city. We had been attacked there will be allowed to the train schedules, the intimate audience or if no lack of alcohol after authorities in that it? Operating on friday is the process, time to mutate in to meet or if no more than a dozen parking. Dartmouth river cruises every day a week except Sunday. Inner harbor ferry and. Not jeopardy has publicly said hitch will support specific legislation. Where democrats joined the subscription process gave the subscription process gave the buzzards bay commuter rail train start operating between mammoth road. Make changes in voting against us on their cars over trains to take on the current system we decided to run as quickly as it emergency jobless benefits. Get from haverhill. Springfield Line the the CSX tracks, Peabody and Topsfield! Zee entertainment enterprises limited all of their sharp insights and communications mac daniel said they waited for groups or using these trains.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS
    New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS Table of CONTENTS Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the Author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Federal Highway Administration. New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN Page left blank intentionally. Table of CONTENTS Acknowledgements The New Jersey Department of Transportation’s Division of Multimodal Services thanks the many organizations and individuals for their time and contribution in making this document possible. New Jersey Department of Transportation Nicole Minutoli Paul Truban Genevieve Clifton Himanshu Patel Andrew Ludasi New Jersey Freight Advisory Committee Calvin Edghill, FHWA Keith Skilton, FHWA Anne Strauss-Wieder, NJTPA Jakub Rowinski, NJTPA Ted Dahlburg, DVRPC Mike Ruane, DVRPC Bill Schiavi, SJTPO David Heller, SJTPO Steve Brown, PANYNJ Victoria Farr, PANYNJ Stephanie Molden, PANYNJ Alan Kearns, NJ TRANSIT Steve Mazur, SJTA Rodney Oglesby, CSX Rick Crawford, Norfolk Southern Michael Fesen, Norfolk Southern Jocelyn Hill, Conrail Adam Baginski, Conrail Kelvin MacKavanagh, New Jersey Short Line Railroad Association Brian Hare, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation David Rosenberg, New York State Department of Transportation Consultant Team Jennifer Grenier, WSP Stephen Chiaramonte, WSP Alan Meyers, WSP Carlos Bastida, WSP Joseph Bryan, WSP Sebastian Guerrero, WSP Debbie Hartman, WSP Ruchi Shrivastava, WSP Reed Sibley, WSP Scudder Smith, WSP Scott Parker, Jacobs Engineering Jayne Yost, Jacobs Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Transit in Shared Use, F T a Report 0008
    Safe Transit in Shared Use JULY 2011 FTA Report No. 0008 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Alfred E. Fazio, PE A. R. Troup Bridget Hodgeson Jack Kanarek SYSTRA Consulting, Inc. Philadelphia, PA COVER PHOTO Courtesy of Alfred E. Fazio of BRT Services DISCLAIMER This document is intended as a technical assistance product. It is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products of manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. SYSTRA Consulting, Inc. is an EEO/AA/Title VI/Title IX/Section 504/ADA/ADEA employer and actively seeks to diversify its work force. Safe Transit in Shared Use JULY 2011 FTA Report No. 0008 PREPARED BY SYSTRA Consulting, Inc. 1600 Market St., Ste 1310 Philadelphia, PA 19103 in Association with BRT Services, LLC http://www.fta.dot.gov/research SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 AVAILABLE ONLINE http://www.fta.dot.gov/research FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION I Metric Conversion Table Metric Conversion Table SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61
    [Show full text]
  • Rail & Road to Recovery
    RAIL & ROAD TO RECOVERY April 2020 Tri-State Transportation Campaign BlueWaveNJ Clean Water Action Environment New Jersey New Jersey Policy Perspective New Jersey Sierra Club SUMMARY Transit and environmental advocates strongly oppose the New Jersey Turnpike Authority’s unprecedented 2020 Capital Plan, which will direct $16 billion toward road expansion projects. The $24 billion capital plan calls for more than 50 major projects to be undertaken on the New Jersey Turnpike and Garden State Parkway in rolling, five-year increments. Thirteen of these projects will ultimately widen over 100 miles of roadway on the Turnpike and Parkway, and none of the projects would allow for any transit expansion or incorporate a transit component. This proposed capital program directly contradicts the state’s Energy Master Plan, released in January after a year-long process, which aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and transition the state to 100% clean energy sources by 2050, with an emphasis on expanding public transportation options and reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT). In contrast, Rail and Road to Recovery, our alternative capital plan, highlights 27 unfunded mass transit projects totaling over $25.8 billion that would create 1.28 million jobs that should be funded with the $16 billion currently slated for highway expansion. NJTA’s plan also doesn’t take getting the state’s roads and bridges into a state of good repair seriously --36% of the state’s highways are deficient (rough and/or distressed), 529 bridges are structurally deficient and 2,367 are in need of repair. The price tag for unfunded fix-it-first projects is over $10 billion --at least $8.6 billion for bridges and $679 million for just the top 500 state road projects over the next few years, which doesn’t even include needed repairs to the far larger network of local and county roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Drew and the Saratoga & Hudson River
    MADE AVAILABLE BY THE GREENE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY'S VEDDER RESEARCH LIBRARY A PUBLICATION OF THE GREENE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY, INC. 90 County Route 42 Volume 36 Numbers 1+2 Coxsackie, N. Y. 12051 ISBN 0894-8135 Spring & Summer 2012 UNCLE DANIEL'S WHITE ELEPHANT: DANIEL DREW AND THE SARATOGA & HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD BY DANIEL W. BIGLER Daniel Drew, shown here in an engraving from the Library of Congress, represented the American romantic ideal of the self-made man, rising from humble beginnings to a position of great wealth and power. He worked in a number of fields over the years, ranging from cattle-driving to the stock market to steamboats and railroads. Over the years Drew frequently found himself involved with Cornelius Vanderbilt, and in 1864 a joint railroad venture between them would bring Drew to the town of Athens in Greene County. This venture, officially known as the Saratoga & Hudson River Railroad, would become known colloquially as the "White Elephant Railroad." Drew was a prime example of the larger-than-life Romantic hero (or anti-hero), who would do whatever was necessary to get ahead, while the "White Elephant" represented the grand dreams of one particular community. Its dramatic end served as a fitting symbol of the end of its era. continued on page 02 DOUBLE EDITION: SPRING & SUMMER 2012 TOGETHER! VEDDER RESEARCH LIBRARY 90 COUNTY ROUTE 42, COXSACKIE, NY 12051 MADE AVAILABLE BY THE GREENE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY'S VEDDER RESEARCH LIBRARY UNCLE DANIEL'S WHITE ELEPHANT ... from page 01 FROM BOY TO MAN the Sixty-First New York State Militia Daniel Drew was born on a farm in Carmel, Regiment.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Wrong Side of the Railroad Tracks: Public Access to the Hudson River
    Pace Environmental Law Review Volume 13 Issue 2 Spring 1996 Article 28 Symposium Edition April 1996 On the Wrong Side of the Railroad Tracks: Public Access to the Hudson River Matthew R. Atkinson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pelr Recommended Citation Matthew R. Atkinson, On the Wrong Side of the Railroad Tracks: Public Access to the Hudson River, 13 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 747 (1996) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pelr/vol13/iss2/28 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Environmental Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. On the Wrong Side of the Railroad Tracks: Public Access to the Hudson River MATTHw R. ATKINSON* Table of Contents I. Introduction .................................... 749 II. High-Speed Ground Transportation ............ 753 A. The New York State Plan .................. 753 B. The Regulatory Structure ................... 758 C. Specific Impacts on Hudson River Access ... 761 D. Procedural Review of Adverse Impacts to Access ....................... .............. 764 III. Substantive Law Affecting Access to the Hudson R iver ........................................... 767 A. The Public Trust Doctrine .................. 767 1. Introduction ............................ 767 2. Background ............................. 768 a. Historical Antecedents .............. 768 b. State Law Variations ............... 769 c. Federal Law ........................ 772 i. Commerce Clause ............... 773 ii. Treaty Law ...................... 774 iii. Eminent Domain ................ 775 iv. Admission of States into the U nion ........................... 777 * Fellow, Pace Environmental Litigation Clinic, Inc., Pace University School of Law. J.D. 1994, Pace University School of Law; A.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Transit Shared Use and Control Systems Study Final Report
    Rail Transit Shared Use and Control Systems Study Final Report MARCH 2014 FTA Report No. 0062 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Lawrence E. Light, P.E. Stephen McEvoy Jack Kanarek SYSTRA Consulting, Inc. Philadelphia, PA COVER PHOTO Photo courtesy of Bob Vogel. Entitled “Southbound River LINE meets NS 39G and NS 65W at Cove Road” showing Locomotives: NJT 3501(LRV), BNSF 5181(C44-9W), and NS 8108(ES44AC). DISCLAIMER This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products of manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Rail Transit Shared Use and Control Systems Study Final Report MARCH 2014 FTA Report No. 0062 PREPARED BY Lawrence E. Light, P.E. Stephen McEvoy Jack Kanarek SYSTRA Consulting, Inc. 1600 Market St, Suite 1310 Philadelphia, PA 19103 SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Budget and Policy U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 AVAILABLE ONLINE http://www.fta.dot.gov/research FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i MetricMetric Conversion Conversion Table Table Metric Conversion Table SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liters L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg megagrams T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 Mg (or "t") (or "metric ton") TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) 5 (F-32)/9 oF Fahrenheit Celsius oC or (F-32)/1.8 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION iv FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Network and Infrastructure
    TECHNICAL MEMO NYMTC Regional Freight Plan Update 2015-2040 Interim Plan Task 2.1.2 Rail Network and Infrastructure REVISED, JANUARY 2014 technical memorandum Task 2.1.2 Technical Memorandum Rail Network and Infrastructure Revised, January 30, 2014 Task 2.1.2 Technical Memorandum Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Institutional Structure ........................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Background .................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Class I Carriers and Affiliates ................................................................... 2-4 CSX................................................................................................................ 2-4 Norfolk Southern (NS) ............................................................................... 2-6 Conrail Shared Assets ................................................................................ 2-9 Canadian Pacific (CP) ............................................................................... 2-10 2.3 Short Line and Regional Firms ............................................................... 2-10 Housatonic Railroad ................................................................................. 2-10 New York and Atlantic Railway ............................................................. 2-10 New York New Jersey Rail .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson River Waterfront Transitway System
    Hudson River Waterfront Transitway System JOSEPH MARTIN, S. DAVID PHRANER, AND JoHN D. WILKINs unique transitway has been pro- 75,000 trips made by bus ultimately posed for New Jersey's Hud- will find their way onto the transitway. son River waterfront. A nar- The core of the proposed transitway is row strip of land is being converted the state-of-the-art light rail transit from railroad yards to large-scale (LRT) facility to carry intrawaterfront mixed use development. At 35 million trips. A busway component and land ft2 of commercial floor space and access roadway have been designated 35,000 dwellings, this new develop- to integrate with the LRT. Transitway ment requires a high-capacity transit- design variations include LRT exclu- way. Add to the trips generated by the sive, busway exclusive, transit in new development nearly 200,000 peak street, bus and LRT sharing right-of- period trips (7 to 10 a.m.) passing way, and, in one location, bus and LRT through the waterfront to the Manhat- sharing travel lanes. tan central business district. At least "RECYCLING" IS A POPULAR buzzword in our environmentally aware society. Along the Hudson River waterfront, the term is being applied in two unique ways: recycling waterfront land and recycling the concept of light rail transit (LRT) in support of development. Imagine the opportunities in a strip of land 18 mi long and never more than a mile wide, largely vacant, and 1,000 yd from Manhattan's central business district (CBD). Five years ago, when commercial rentals approached $40/ft2 in Manhattan, one perceptive J.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Branch of Hudson-Bergen Light Rail
    1 HUDSON-BERGEN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT TO ENGLEWOOD & TENAFLY STILL “… THE WAY TO GO” GOOD IDEA THEN GOOD IDEA NOW 2 Presented by LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PANEL Rose Heck, Chairman: Mayor of Hasbrouck Heights, former State Assemblywoman and Chair of the original New Jersey Assembly Bipartisan Light Rail Panel Jack May, Rail Transit Author/Historian Frank Miklos, retired NJT Manager Philip Craig, Railroad and Rail Transit Consultant HUDSON-BERGEN LIGHT RAIL 3 HUDSON-BERGEN LIGHT RAIL New Jersey Transit map showing the existing system and its original plan to extend the line to Ridgefield, Palisades Park, Leonia, Englewood and Tenafly 4 5 HUDSON-BERGEN LIGHT RAIL Opened April 2000 Built in Stages Now 20.2 Miles Long 23 Stations Mostly Grade-Separated but has Street Running Long Tunnel with Deep Union City Station 52 Kinkisharyo LRVs - MU Operation Express Service THE HUDSON-BERGEN LIGHT RAIL LINE SHOWS CONTINUED GROWTH AND SUCCESS 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 Weekday Passengers 5,000 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Year 6 7 HUDSON-BERGEN LIGHT RAIL PATRONAGE BY STATION 6,500 6,000 5,500 5,000 4,500 4,000 Hudson Bergen Light Rail - Ridership Trends 8/07 to 8/08 3,500 3,000 Weekday2,500 Boardings 2,000 August 2007 (38,461) 1,500 August 2008 (44,240) 1,000 500 0 22nd St. 34th St. 45th St. Danforth Richard St. West Side MLK Drive Garfield Ave Liberty P/R Jersey Ave. Marin Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson-Bergen Light Rail Transit System Joint Occupancy-Joint Use
    Hudson-Bergen Light Rail Transit System Joint Occupancy-Joint Use Richard F. Hernon, New Jersey Transit Light rail systems share their rights-of-way with most other to the Exit 14C toll plaza on the New Jersey Turnpike modes of ground transportation. The proposed Hudson- Extension. This major junction is referred to as Gateway. Bergen Light Rail Transit System and the planned and po• One branch will extend north from Gateway to the tential joint use and joint occupancies are described. Trans• southern and eastern edges of downtown Jersey City for portation systems and modes that will or could share the about 2.5 km. The branch will then continue 2 km light rail transit route are freight railroads, commuter rail• through easements provided by three Waterfront devel• roads, roadway vehicles, pedestrians, bicycles, and utilities. opers to Hoboken. Upon leaving the easement area, the Methods of accommodating other kinds of transportation alignment will cross New Jersey (NJ) Transit's Hoboken are also discussed. rail yard into the city of Hoboken. In Hoboken the alignment will run 4.6 km on the east side along local roads. Most of the Hoboken alignment follows streets ight rail transit (LRT) can share its operating on the former Hoboken Shore Railroad, much of it on alignment with most other forms of land-based the west edge of the Hudson River. I-J transportation. Many, if not all, light rail systems North of Hoboken the alignment will follow the for• in operation share their alignments with one or more mer Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) River forms of transportation.
    [Show full text]