DOCSLIB.ORG

Single Market Forum in Krakow, Poland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Single Market Forum in Krakow, Poland 1st SINGLE MARKET FORUM Krakow, POLAND 2-4 October 2011 Single Market Fair: The Igloo in the main market square Mr Malcolm HARBOUR IMCO Chair, visiting the Igloo The European Parliament Stand at the Single Market Fair Polska Project Stand ECC-Net Stand SOLVIT Stand Preparatory Meeting before the Forum Mr Waldemar Pawlak, Polish Deputy Prime Minister, and Mr Malcolm Harbour at the formal opening of the Single Market Fair Formal opening of the Single Market Fair 3 October Single Market Fair Awarding of the prize ‘Union Without Barriers’ From left to right: Ms Róza Thun und Hohenstein, Ms Diana Wallis and Mr Rafal Trzaskowski, Members of the European Parliament and Mr Malcolm Harbour From left to right: Mr Rafal Trzaskowski, Ms Róza Thun und Hohenstein, Mr Malcolm Harbour, and Mr Michel Barnier, Commissioner for Internal Market and Services With the winners of the prize From left to right: Ms Constance Le Grip, Mr Malcolm Harbour, Mr Rafal Trzaskowski and Ms Diana Wallis, Members of the European Parliament 3 October The Forum The entrance of the Auditorium Maximum, Jagiellonian University From left to right: Ms Jutta Steinruck, Mr Hans-Peter Mayer, Ms Diana Wallis, Ms Evelyne Gebhardt, Ms Heide Rühle, Mr Malcolm Harbour, Mr Louis Grech and Mr Edvard Kožušník, Members of the European Parliament Mr Malcolm Harbour and Mr Louis Grech From left to right: Ms Jutta Steinruck, Ms Heide Rühle and Mr Hans-Peter Mayer Before the official opening of the Forum From left to right: Mr Jerzy Buzek, President of the European Parliament, Mr Malcolm Harbour and Mr Waldemar Pawlak, Deputy Prime Minister of Poland From left to right: Mr Hans-Peter Mayer, Mr Jerzy Buzek, Ms Diana Wallis, Mr Edvard Kožušník, Mr Malcolm Harbour and Ms Jutta Steinruck From left to right: Ms Róza Thun und Hohenstein, Mr Jerzy Buzek, Mr Waldemar Pawlak, Mr Malcolm Harbour and Mr Michel Barnier 3 October The opening of the Forum Speech by Mr Waldemar Pawlak Deputy Prime Minister of Poland Speech by Mr Jerzy Buzek President of the European Parliament Speech by Mr Michel Barnier Commissioner for Internal Market and Services Front row: Mr Buzek and Mr Pawlak Middle row (left to right): Ms Steinruck, Ms Gebhardt , Mr Mayer, Ms Vergnaud, Ms Rühle and Mr Kožušník 3 October Declaration by the Polish Youth Mr Barnier, Mr Pawlak, Mr Trzaskowski and Ms Thun und Hohenstein with the winners of the ‘Union without barriers’ prize 3 October The Forum ‘Tell us your story’ Screening of the winning stories Ms Jacki Davis (Moderator) introducing the five winners of the ‘Tell us your story’ competition 3 October The Forum The presentation of ‘20 main concerns of citizens and enterprises in the Single Market’ Speech by Mr Louis Grech 3 October The Forum Panel Discussion Ms Róza Thun und Hohenstein and Mr Malcolm Harbour From left to right: Mr Louis Grech, Mr Waldemar Pawlak, Ms Jacki Davis, Mr Michel Barnier, Ms Róza Thun und Hohenstein and Mr Malcolm Harbour Mr Louis Grech and Mr Waldemar Pawlak From left to right: Mr Michel Barnier, Ms Róza Thun und Hohenstein and Mr Malcolm Harbour The Panellists Mr Malcolm Harbour interviewed Workshops Workshop on Professional Qualifications Ms Bernardette Vergnaud Member of the European Parliament Workshop on Professional Qualifications Mr Malcolm Harbour Workshop on Professional Qualifications In the centre: Ms Constance Le Grip Workshop on Alternative Dispute Resolution and Online Dispute Resolution Ms Diana Wallis (right) Ms Jacqueline Minor Moderator of the Workshop on ADR Workshop on Points of Single Contact The Panel Workshop on E-Commerce Mr Pablo Arias Echeverría, Member of the European Parliament (left) and panellists Workshop on E-Commerce Ms Anna Maria Corazza Bildt Member of the European Parliament Workshop on E-Commerce Intervention by the audience Workshop on Posting of Workers and Fundamental Social Rights The Panel Key speech by Ms Evelyne Gebhardt (centre) Ms Iliana Ivanova Member of the European Parliament Ms Evelyne Gebhardt The audience Workshop on Public Procurement Ms Joanna Szychowska European Commission (Moderator) Workshop on Public Procurement Mr António Correia de Campos (left) Member of the European Parliament Workshop on Public Procurement Ms Heide Rühle Workshop on Bridging the gap between citizens and the Single Market Emer Daly, European Commission (Moderator) and Mr Louis Grech Workshop on Bridging the gap between citizens and the Single Market Ms Róza Thun und Hohenstein The audience Intervention by the audience The audience Workshop on Citizens’ Rights The Panel Mr Cristian Silviu Buşoi Member of the European Parliament 4 October Reports from the Workshops The Rapporteurs The audience Mr António Correia de Campos and Mr Maciej Szpunar, Polish Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Ms Susanne Bo Christensen, Internal Market Centre (Denmark), Ms Róza Thun und Hohenstein and Mr António Correia de Campos Ms Bernardette Vergnaud Mr António Correia de Campos Ms Róza Thun und Hohenstein Mr Malcolm Harbour, Mr Joe Dunne, Head of the IMCO Secretariat and the IMCO Team 4 October Krakow Declaration on the Single Market Mr Malcolm Harbour, Chairman of the Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee, Mr John Dalli, Commissioner for Health and Consumer Policy and Mr Marcin Korolec, Polish Under-Secretary of State Left to right: Ms Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Mr Hans-Peter Mayer, Mr Louis Grech, Ms Jutta Steinruck, Ms Evelyne Gebhardt, Ms Constance Le Grip and Ms Bernardette Vergnaud The winners of the ‘Tell us your story’ competition delivering the Krakow Declaration Surprise intervention by Mr Malcolm Harbour Mr Malcolm Harbour and Mr Marcin Korolec Mr Malcolm Harbour promoting the IMCO Newsletter and ‘The friends of IMCO Network’ Speech by Mr Marcin Korolec 4 October First Panel Debate The Panel Mr Marcin Korolec Under-Secretary of State for the Ministry of Economy of Poland From left to right: Mr John Dalli, Commissioner for Health and Consumer Policy, Mr Malcolm Harbour, Chairman of the Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee and Mr Staffan Nilsson, President of the European Economical and Social Committe Mr Arnoldas Abramavičius Chair of the Commission for Economic and Social Policy Committee of the Regions Mr Staffan Nilsson President of the European Economical and Social Committee Ms Róza Thun und Hohenstein and Mr Andreas Schwab Members of the European Parliament The audience Ms Jacki Davis and Mr John Dalli 4 October Conclusion of the Forum Closing Speech by Mr John Dalli Mr Korolec, Ms Thun und Hohenstein, Ms Corazza Bildt and Mr Mayer Ms Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Mr Louis Grech and Ms Evelyne Gebhardt Mr Louis Grech and Mr Pablo Arias Echeverría Members present during the Forum MembersDiana attendedWALLIS (Vice-President of the European Parliament - ALDE) Malcolm HARBOUR (Chairman of the IMCO Committee – ECR) Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA (EPP) Anna Maria CORAZZA-BILDT (EPP) Iliana IVANOVA (EPP) Constance LE GRIP (EPP) Hans-Peter MAYER (EPP) Andreas SCHWAB (EPP) Małgorzata HANDZLIK (EPP) Róża VON THUN UND HOHENSTEIN (EPP) Rafał TRZASKOWSKI (EPP) António Fernando CORREIA DE CAMPOS (S&D) Evelyne GEBHARDT (S&D) Louis GRECH (S&D) Bernadette VERGNAUD (S&D) Jutta STEINRÜCK (S&D) Cristian Silviu BUŞOI (ALDE) Edvard KOŽUŠNÍK (ECR) Heide RÜHLE (Greens/EFA) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Economic Congress 2015 Agenda
    1 Agenda of the European Economic Congress 2015 Inaugural session 20 April 2015 10.00-18.00 The difficult Europe The effects of the crisis still impact the performance of economies and public finances of many European states. The spectre of stagnation is still there. Europe is burdened with unemployment and the lack of prospects for young people. The formally united European Community has to contend with a scarcity of actual cohesion. Internal contradictions hamper joint action, undermine the competitiveness of the economy and block free market mechanisms. Political instability around Europe hampers development planning and impedes initiative. The future of our Europe is a set of difficult questions. The European Economic Congress will attempt to answer them. 10.00-10.10 Opening of the Congress and reception of Guests: – Wojciech Kuśpik – Chairman of the Board, PTWP SA, Initiator of the European Economic Congress – Piotr Litwa – Voivode of Silesia – Wojciech Saługa – Marshal of the Silesian Voivodeship – Marcin Krupa – Mayor of Katowice – Jerzy Buzek – Member of the European Parliament, President of the European Parliament between 2009-2012, Prime Minister of the Republic of Poland between 1997-2001, Chairman of the Council of the EEC 10.10-10.30 Inaugural speeches: – Bronisław Komorowski – President of the Republic of Poland – Andrej Kiska – President of the Slovak Republic 10.30-12.00 300 billion for the new Europe. The large-scale investment programme of the European Union How to break stagnation in the economy? Demographic, political and economic risks The capital, regulations and leverage: the mechanics of the new financial vehicle More freedom and more responsibility: a comparison with previously used investment support mechanisms The role of the European Commission, financial market institutions and private investors The need for wise priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Industry Interference with Tobacco Control Policies in Poland
    TC Online First, published on September 28, 2015 as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052582 Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052582 on 28 September 2015. Downloaded from Research paper Tobacco industry interference with tobacco control policies in Poland: legal aspects and industry practices Łukasz Balwicki,1 Michał Stokłosa,2 Małgorzata Balwicka-Szczyrba,3 Wioleta Tomczak4 ▸ Additional material is ABSTRACT has had only moderate success in implementing its published online only. To view Background Since 2006, when Poland ratified the WHO provisions. Poland’s tobacco control law underwent please visit the journal online Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), there revision in 2010 and 2011 to extend smoke-free (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ 5 tobaccocontrol-2015-052582). have been efforts to improve tobacco control regulation in areas and improve point-of-purchase regulation; the country. At the same time, at the European Union however, the scope of the revision has been greatly 1Department of Public Health and Social Medicine, Medical level, Poland took part in discussions over revision of the reduced during the legislative process. Despite rati- University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Tobacco Tax Directive and the Tobacco Products Directive. fying the WHO FCTC, many tobacco control regu- Poland This study aims to explore the tobacco industry’s tactics to lations still do not meet its requirements. For 2 Economic and Health Policy interfere with the creation of those policies. example, Poland still has partial smoke-free laws6 Research, American Cancer Methods Analysis of 257 documents obtained through and incomplete advertisement, promotion7 and Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 8 3Department of Civil Law, freedom of information request.
    [Show full text]
  • Polacy O Pracy Ministrów I Rekonstrukcji Rządu
    Warszawa, listopad 2013 BS/154/2013 POLACY O PRACY MINISTRÓW I REKONSTRUKCJI RZĄDU Znak jakości przyznany CBOS przez Organizację Firm Badania Opinii i Rynku 11 stycznia 2013 roku Fundacja Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej ul. Żurawia 4a, 00-503 Warszawa e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] http://www.cbos.pl (48 22) 629 35 69 W obecnym miesiącu miną dwa lata od zaprzysiężenia drugiego rządu premiera Donalda Tuska. Niemal od początku jego funkcjonowania nie cichną dywagacje na temat ewentualnych zmian personalnych, a od wielu miesięcy w mediach pojawiają się informacje o planach dotyczących poważnej rekonstrukcji. Pewne zmiany zapowiedział sam premier. W październikowym sondażu1 spytaliśmy Polaków o ocenę poszczególnych ministrów i stosunek do ewentualnej rekonstrukcji rządu. OCENA MINISTRÓW Na ranking najlepiej i najgorzej ocenianych ministrów duży wpływ ma stopień rozpoznawalności poszczególnych członków rządu. Mało znani ministrowie2 są rzadko wskazywani zarówno jako dobrzy, jak i źli ministrowie. Najlepiej ocenianym ministrem, dystansującym pozostałych członków rządu, jest minister spraw zagranicznych Radosław Sikorski (33%). Na drugim miejscu znalazł się minister kultury i dziedzictwa narodowego Bogdan Zdrojewski (17%). Niemal co ósmy Polak uważa, że najlepiej swoje obowiązki pełnią premier Donald Tusk (13%) i wicepremier Janusz Piechociński (12%). Piątym z najlepiej ocenianych ministrów jest minister administracji i cyfryzacji Michał Boni (10%). Stosunkowo niewielu Polaków za najlepszego ministra uznało kierującego resortem
    [Show full text]
  • 関西学院大学産業研究所 KG-SANKEN Discussion Paper No.12
    関西学院大学産業研究所 KG-SANKEN Discussion Paper No.12 KG- SANKEN DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES KG-SANKEN No.12 Multi-Layered Strategies in Global Governance Structure: Case of UNFCCC COP19 and the Coal and Climate Summit in Warsaw in 2013 関西学院大学産業研究所 副所長・ 准教授 市川 顕 Deputy Director & Associate Professor, Institute for Industrial Research, Kwansei Gakuin University 2015年 8月 関西学院大学産業研究所 Institute for Industrial Research, Kwansei Gakuin University 〒 662-8501 兵庫県西宮市上ケ原一番町1-155 TEL: 0798-54-6127 FAX: 0798-54-6029 E-mail： sanken＠ kwansei.ac.jp URL: http://www.kwansei.ac.jp/i_industrial/index.html 1 Multi-Layered Strategies in Global Governance Structure: Case of UNFCCC COP19 and the Coal and Climate Summit in Warsaw in 2013 Akira ICHIKAWA Kwansei Gakuin University Associate Professor 1: Preface 1-1: Aim of the Paper Poland has abundant coal resources on its territory. This has led it since its accession to the EU to oppose the EU 1 ’s ambitious climate change and energy policies. In the negotiations on the so-called “Triple 20 directive” 2 of climate change targets to be achieved by 2020 - a 20% reduction in GHG 3 emissions compared to 1990 levels, raising the proportion of renewable energy in primary energy production to 20%, and a 20% increase in energy efficiency compared with 1990 - Poland was joined in its opposition by several of the other new member states. However, in the later negotiation on the “Energy Roadmap 2050”, which agreed on a 80-95% reduction in GHG emissions compared with 1990, only Poland vehemently opposed the plan. As a result, the country has become relatively isolated from the other EU member states in its energy and climate policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Steht Später Die Headline
    LÄNDERBERICHT Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. AUSLANDSBÜRO POLEN MAXIMILIAN HEDRICH DR. CHRISTIAN SCHMITZ www.kas.pl „Sieben auf einen Streich“ www.kas.de PREMIERMINISTER TUSK RÜSTET SICH FÜR DIE ZWEITE HÄLFTE SEINER Dezember 2013 AMTSZEIT Mit einer großen Kabinettsumbildung ist ungeschickt handelnden Regierungschefs, Polens Premierminister Donald Tusk in die der mit allen Mitteln versucht, seine Macht zweite Hälfte der Legislaturperiode ge- über die nächsten zwei Jahre zu retten. startet: Gleich sieben Kabinettsmitglieder Obendrein ist das Verhältnis zwischen den wurden ausgetauscht und durch neue Ge- Koalitionsparteien PO und der Bauernpartei sichter ersetzt. Doch ob daraus frischer PSL ramponiert. Premierminister Donald Wind entsteht, der die Bürgerplattform PO Tusk hatte seinen kleinen Partner mit der aus dem Umfragetief trägt, bleibt noch Entscheidung für eine Kabinettsumbildung abzuwarten. buchstäblich überrollt. Zwar wurde kein Mi- nisterium der PSL angerührt, aber das Al- Zustimmung für die Regierung auf Re- leinhandeln des Regierungschefs hat nun zu kordtief einer Vertrauenskrise der Koalitionspartner geführt. Eine Kabinettsumbildung zur Mitte der Le- gislaturperiode ist in Polen durchaus üblich, Der Grund für Tusks Handeln, so sind sich doch dass auf einen Schlag gleich sieben praktisch alle Beobachter einig, liegt in den Minister ausgetauscht werden, ist auch in miserablen Umfragewerten der regierenden Polen ungewöhnlich. Premierminister Do- konservativ-liberalen Bürgerplattform PO. nald Tusk hatte eine mögliche Umbildung Die Partei verliert seit Jahresbeginn deutlich zur Hälfte der Legislaturperiode schon vor an Boden und liegt derzeit bei ca. 19 Pro- geraumer Zeit in Aussicht gestellt, daher zent und somit deutlich hinter der größten reagierten die Öffentlichkeit sowie die Medi- Oppositionspartei Recht und Gerechtigkeit en wenig überrascht. PiS von Jarosław Kaczyński (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Mobility in Poland As a Business Opportunity Authors
    E-mobility in Poland as a business opportunity authors Krzysztof Bolesta Electric Vehicles Promotion Foundation [email protected] Marcin Korolec President of the Electric Vehicles Promotion Foundation [email protected] Agata Staniewska Consultant editor Rachel van Horn design Anna Olczak The report was commissioned by the Netherlands Embassy in Warsaw and the Netherlands Enterprise Agency. All rights reserved. Electric Vehicles Promotion Foundation is a Warsaw-based think tank established to accelerate the up-take of e-mobility in Poland. We run the Innovative Transport Forum, the biggest dialog platform for stakeholders interested in advancing the idea of e-mobility. We provide analytical services on demand. Warsaw, May 2018 E-mobility in Poland as a business opportunity Executive summary 9 The e-mobility market is growing fast. Sales Poland has grand ambitions for e-mobili- of new electric cars worldwide surpassed ty and legislation in place to enable their 1 million units in 2017, an increase of 54 per realization. But Poland lacks sufficient in- cent compared with 2016. The global stock centives for e-mobility uptake, which, as of electric cars surpassed 3 million units in research and experience has shown, is the 2017 after crossing the 2-million mark only prerequisite of rapid market growth. The in 2016. The spread of electric vehicles is Polish market has great economic poten- supported by climate action policy, rising tial due to its size and the importance of concerns over air quality in ever more con- the automotive sector for the country's gested cities, and also energy security. After economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Prezes Wyższego Urzędu Górniczego
    PREZES WYŻSZEGO URZĘDU GÓRNICZEGO Katowice, dnia ":3 czerwca 2013 r. PR.0201.116.2012 L.dz.11.b30 /06/2013/JR Działając na podstawie upoważnienia Ministra Środowiska z dnia 30 czerwca 2010 L, znak DGiKGug 018-l/30928/10/AW, udzielonego na podstawie § 6 ust. 3 uchwały nr 49 Rady Ministrów z dnia 19 marca 2002 r. - Regulamin pracy Rady Ministrów (M. P. Nr 13, poz. 221, z późno zm.), a także § 12 ust. l, 4 i 5 oraz § 16 ust. 2 tej uchwały, uprzejmie proszę o zajęcie stanowiska wobec projektu rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów w sprawie ustanowienia Odznaki Honorowej Zasłużonego dla Bezpieczeństwa w Górnictwie, ustalenia jej wzoru, zasad i trybu nadawania oraz sposobu nosze- nia (wersja z dnia 3 czerwca 2013 r.), udostępnionego, wraz z uzasadnieniem, oceną skutków regula- cji oraz wstępną opinią o zgodności projektu z prawem Unii Europejskiej, w Biuletynie Informacji Publicznej Rządowego Centrum Legislacji (na stronie internetowej Rządowego Procesu Legislacyjne- go), stosownie do § 11a powołanej uchwały. Projekt został umieszczony w Wykazie prac legislacyjnych i poza1egislacyjnych Rady Ministrów pod numerem RD168. Był on pierwotnie (nosząc inny tytuł: w sprawie ustanowienia odznaki honoro- wej "Zasłużony dla Bezpieczeństwa w Górnictwie ", ustalenia jej wzoru, zasad i trybu nadawania oraz sposobu noszenia) przedmiotem uzgodnień międzyresortowych w 2010 r. (pismo Prezesa Wyższego Urzędu Górniczego z dnia 7 września 2010 r., znak PRl020l/0127/1O/15276/JR). Ponadto w 2013 r. Komisja Heraldyczna zaopiniowała pozytywnie wzór Odznaki Honorowej Zasłużonego dla Bezpie- czeństwa w Górnictwie oraz zasady i tryb jej nadawania i noszenia, a Prezydent Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej wyraził zgodę na przedłożony wzór oraz sposób noszenia tej Odznaki.
    [Show full text]
  • Inconvenience Versus Rationality: Reflections on Different Faces Of
    OCTOBER 2018 C E G L A R Z E T A L . 821 Inconvenience versus Rationality: Reflections on Different Faces of Climate Contrarianism in Poland and Norway ANDRZEJ CEGLARZ Bavarian School of Public Policy, Technical University Munich, Munich, and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, and Renewables Grid Initiative, Berlin, Germany RASMUS E. BENESTAD Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway ZBIGNIEW W. KUNDZEWICZ Institute for the Agricultural and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan, Poland, and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany (Manuscript received 1 November 2017, in final form 9 August 2018) ABSTRACT There has been increasing scientific evidence related to climate change and its attribution, impacts, and possibilities of mitigation. Yet, climate contrarianism still persists. This paper concentrates on Poland and Norway—two fossil fuel giants that represent essential differences on climate contrarianism. In Norway there is a broad social and political consensus about the attribution and importance of climate change and a mo- tivation to undertake climate change mitigation measures, whereas in Poland the inconvenient truth on an- thropogenic climate change remains particularly inconvenient. By taking a qualitative approach, this paper discusses different drivers of climate contrarianism in both countries; provides examples of contrarian atti- tudes present in society, media, politics, and research; and compares their role in Polish and Norwegian contexts. The findings show the difficulties in defining universal factors determining contrarian attitudes, because their understanding and weight can be different among countries and a more nuanced analysis is needed to scrutinize different national contexts. The conclusion calls for more comparative research, which would combine quantitative and qualitative approaches investigating climate contrarianism.
    [Show full text]
  • Prezes Pansiwowej Agencji Atomistyki
    PREZES PANSIWOWEJ AGENCJI ATOMISTYKI P-PAAl596 12931 12011 Warszawa, dnia 20 grudnia 2011 r. wg rozdzielnika Oziatajqc na podstawie § 12 ust. 1 uchwaty Nr 49 Rady Ministraw z dnia 19 marca 2002 r. - Regulamin pracy Rady Ministraw (M. P. Nr 13, poz. 221 z pazn. zm .) oraz na podstawie upowai:nienia nr 33 Ministra Srodowiska z dnia 8 kwietnia 2011 r., przesytam w zaJqczeniu: 1) projekt rozporzqdzenia Rady Ministr6w w sprawie wymagan bezpieczenstwa jqdrowego i ochrony radiologicznej, jakie ma uwzg/~dniac projekt obiektu jqdrowego; 2) projekt rozporzqdzenia Rady Ministr6w w sprawie zakresu i sposobu przeprowadzania analiz bezpieczenstwa przeprowadzanych przed wystqpieniem z wnioskiem 0 wydanie zezwolenia na budow~ obiektu jqdrowego, oraz zakresu wst~pnego raportu bezpieczenstwa dla obiektu jqdrowego. Przedmiotowe projekty rozporzqdzen stanowiq wykonanie upowaznlen wynikajqcych z art. 36c ust. 3 oraz art. 36d ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 29 listopada 2000 r. - Prawo atomowe (Oz. U. z 2007 r. Nr 42, poz. 276, z pazn. zm.). Uprzejmie prosz~ 0 zgtoszenie ewentualnych uwag do projektaw przedmiotowych rozporzqdzen w terminie do dnia 03 stycznia 2012 r., pisemnie lub faksem na numer: 22 695 98 32. Niezaj~cie stanowiska w tym terminie uznam za brak zastrzei:en wobec projektaw. zafaczniki Rozdzielnik: 1. Pan Tomasz ARAB SKI Szef Kancelarii Prezesa Rady Ministr6w 2. Pan Jacek CICHOCKI Minister Spraw Wewncttrznych 3. Pan Waldemar PAWLAK - Wicepremier, Minister Gospodarki 4. Pan Jan VINCENT -ROSTOWSKI Minister Finans6w 5. Pani Krystyna SZUMILAS Minister Edukacji Narodowej 6. Pan Marek SAWICKI Minister Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi 7. Pani Elzbieta BIENKOWSKA Minister Rozwoju Regionalnego 8. Pan Joanna MUCHA Minister Sportu i Turystyki 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing EU Climate and Energy Policies in Poland: from Europeanization to Polonization?
    FNI Report 8/2014 Implementing EU Climate and Energy Policies in Poland: From Europeanization to Polonization? Jon Birger Skjærseth Implementing EU Climate and Energy Policies in Poland: From Europeanization to Polonization? Jon Birger Skjærseth [email protected] December 2014 Copyright © Fridtjof Nansen Institute 2014 Title Implementing EU Climate and Energy Policies in Poland: From Europeanization to Polonization? Publication Type and Number Pages FNI Report 8/2014 57 Author ISBN Jon Birger Skjærseth 978-82-7613-683-8 ISSN 1893-5486 Abstract This report examines Poland’s implementation of the EU climate and energy policy package to attain 2020 goals: the extent to which and how these policies have been implemented to date, why and with what consequences for Poland’s positions on new EU climate policies. Because unanimity is required on new long-term climate and energy policy goals, the relationship between the EU and Poland is crucial. Indigenous coal accounts for nearly 90% of the country’s electricity production and 50% of its total CO2 emissions. The first observation is that there have been significant implementation problems concerning the ETS, RES and CCS Directives. The EU package cannot be said to have been a ‘game changer’ – Poland has mainly opposed and absorbed the package to make it fit with existing policies and energy mix. Second, implementation challenges arise from EU adaptation pressure and ‘misfit’ with national policies, negotiating position and energy mix. Domestic politics has also proved important: The consistency in governmental prioritization of coal, opposition to climate policy by state-owned energy groups and privileged access to decision making for these groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Efficiency Gains and Green Growth Perspectives in Poland
    Study Resource Efficiency Gains and Green Growth Perspectives in Poland Szymon Szewrański September 2012 n Poland’s energy sector is mainly based on fossil sources; the power sector depends almost entirely on coal. Only 9 per cent of Poland’s energy production is based on renewable energies. Despite its wealth in natural resources, energy efficiency is cru- cial for a balanced and sustainable development in Poland. n Energy intensity in Poland is almost twice as high as the EU average; greenhouse gas emissions are also high (8 per cent of total EU greenhouse gas emissions). Over 75 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions are caused by the combustion of fossil fuels (mainly coal and oil). Therefore, the main potential for emissions reduction lies in the energy sector. n Some legal, financial and organizational mechanisms have already or are currently being implemented in order to encourage the reduction of emissions. However, po- litical measures to support eco-innovation remain only on a medium level. n The potential for green jobs in Poland is significant. In most regions there are strong academic centres capable of conducting educational projects for the sake of green growth. The environmental awareness among the young generation increases. The main constraints for green growth are administrative barriers, the absence of a clear political strategy to modernise the energy sector, and mechanisms for using environ- mental charges for new investments. SZYMON SZEWRAńSKI | ResOURCE EFFICIENCY GAINS AND GreeN GROWTH PerspeCTIVes IN POLAND Content 1. Economic Policy in Poland ................................................2 2. State of the Environment in Poland ........................................4 2.1 Natural Resources .....................................................4 2.2 Water Resources ......................................................4 2.3 Mineral Resources .....................................................5 2.4 Use of Resources ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Industry Interference with Tobacco Control Policies in Poland
    Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052582 on 28 September 2015. Downloaded from Research paper Tobacco industry interference with tobacco control policies in Poland: legal aspects and industry practices Łukasz Balwicki,1 Michał Stokłosa,2 Małgorzata Balwicka-Szczyrba,3 Wioleta Tomczak4 ▸ Additional material is ABSTRACT has had only moderate success in implementing its published online only. To view Background Since 2006, when Poland ratified the WHO provisions. Poland’s tobacco control law underwent please visit the journal online Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), there revision in 2010 and 2011 to extend smoke-free (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ 5 tobaccocontrol-2015-052582). have been efforts to improve tobacco control regulation in areas and improve point-of-purchase regulation; the country. At the same time, at the European Union however, the scope of the revision has been greatly 1Department of Public Health and Social Medicine, Medical level, Poland took part in discussions over revision of the reduced during the legislative process. Despite rati- University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Tobacco Tax Directive and the Tobacco Products Directive. fying the WHO FCTC, many tobacco control regu- Poland This study aims to explore the tobacco industry’s tactics to lations still do not meet its requirements. For 2 Economic and Health Policy interfere with the creation of those policies. example, Poland still has partial smoke-free laws6 Research, American Cancer Methods Analysis of 257 documents obtained through
    [Show full text]