Resource Efficiency Gains and Green Growth Perspectives in Poland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Resource Efficiency Gains and Green Growth Perspectives in Poland Study Resource Efficiency Gains and Green Growth Perspectives in Poland Szymon Szewrański September 2012 n Poland’s energy sector is mainly based on fossil sources; the power sector depends almost entirely on coal. Only 9 per cent of Poland’s energy production is based on renewable energies. Despite its wealth in natural resources, energy efficiency is cru- cial for a balanced and sustainable development in Poland. n Energy intensity in Poland is almost twice as high as the EU average; greenhouse gas emissions are also high (8 per cent of total EU greenhouse gas emissions). Over 75 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions are caused by the combustion of fossil fuels (mainly coal and oil). Therefore, the main potential for emissions reduction lies in the energy sector. n Some legal, financial and organizational mechanisms have already or are currently being implemented in order to encourage the reduction of emissions. However, po- litical measures to support eco-innovation remain only on a medium level. n The potential for green jobs in Poland is significant. In most regions there are strong academic centres capable of conducting educational projects for the sake of green growth. The environmental awareness among the young generation increases. The main constraints for green growth are administrative barriers, the absence of a clear political strategy to modernise the energy sector, and mechanisms for using environ- mental charges for new investments. SZYMON SZEWRAńSKI | ResOURCE EFFICIENCY GAINS AND GreeN GROWTH PerspeCTIVes IN POLAND Content 1. Economic Policy in Poland ................................................2 2. State of the Environment in Poland ........................................4 2.1 Natural Resources .....................................................4 2.2 Water Resources ......................................................4 2.3 Mineral Resources .....................................................5 2.4 Use of Resources ..................................................... 7 3. Atmospheric Pollution ...................................................9 3.1 Emissions of Greenhouse Gases ...........................................9 3.2 Energy Production ....................................................10 4. Potential for Reducing Emissions .........................................11 4.1 Energy Saving and Emissions Reduction ...................................12 4.2 Economic Innovation ..................................................14 4.3 Green Jobs .........................................................16 5. Environmental Awareness and Society’s Expectations .......................17 6. Prospects for Growth ..................................................18 1 SZYMON SZEWRAńSKI | ResOURCE EFFICIENCY GAINS AND GreeN GROWTH PerspeCTIVes IN POLAND The aim of this chapter is to present current knowledge According to Finance Minister Jacek Rostowski, imple- on the economic, political and social conditions for sus- mentation of the reforms would be a »breakthrough tainable development, with particular reference to the without shock therapy«: in other words, a »long-march state of the environment and Poland’s natural resources. strategy«. According to PO’s leaders, the party’s politi- It also presents a number of critical remarks and reflec- cal programme has always been designed for at least tions on the possibilities for implementing the concept two parliamentary terms of office. It is meant to be an of green growth in Poland. effective alternative to the »myth of a great reform leap forward«. Rostowski assumes that Poland needs a calm and gradual, though steadfast, reform effort in the style 1. Economic Policy in Poland of Margaret Thatcher, which may last decades.3 Soon after the announcement of the parliamentary elec- Tusk’s first term of office coincided with the greatest tion results in 2011, Donald Tusk promised the voters economic crisis since the Second World War. The politi- that »the next four years will be better, faster … we cal declarations of PO leaders, according to whom this must work twice as fast and twice as hard because Poles would be a time of calm and gradual structural reforms, deserve a higher quality of life and a higher quality of were quickly invalidated by social and economic reality. It politics«.1 In the October elections, his victorious Plat- now became more important to neutralise the effects of forma Obywatelska (PO) (Civic Platform) party obtained the world crisis in order to maintain economic growth, 39.18 per cent of the votes. Donald Tusk – starting as halt rising debt and reduce the excessive budget deficit. »number one« in Warsaw – achieved the best result in During its previous term of office, the government had Poland, with 375,000 votes. He is the first freely-elected carried out a few structural changes, such as raising the prime minister in Polish history to serve two successive effective retirement age by five years for people previ- terms of office. The new government’s economic pro- ously eligible for earlier retirement; adopting a spend- gramme was published in November last year, soon af- ing rule; and reforming teaching and higher education. ter the prime minister’s parliamentary address.2 It envis- According to government reports, Poland’s strategy of ages a series of reforms of the pension and tax systems. reducing the negative impact of the crisis in 2008–2011 Their purpose is to promote rapid development and to was the most effective in Europe. Poland recorded the improve competitiveness in relation to other European fastest economic growth in the entire EU. GDP during countries. The current government’s economic policy is this period rose by 15.5 per cent in contrast to the EU based on the principles of solidarity and social justice. average, which fell by 0.5 per cent. In 2009, Poland’s Figure 1: GDP growth in Poland and the EU27, 1996–2010 (previous year =100; fixed prices) Source: Eurostat, »Poland 2011. Economy-Society-Regions«. 1. PAP (Polish Press Agency) report, 17 November 2011. 2. Chancellery of the Prime Minister, Program gospodarczy nowego rządu – dokument (the new government’s economic programme – docu- 3. Jacek Rostowski, Do przyjaciół ekonomistów (To my friends the econo- ment), 18 November 2011. mists), Rzeczpospolita 2 February 2012. 2 SZYMON SZEWRAńSKI | ResOURCE EFFICIENCY GAINS AND GreeN GROWTH PerspeCTIVes IN POLAND GDP rose by 1.6 per cent, the highest increase in the EU.4 The new government’s economic programme calls for In OECD Economic Surveys: Poland 2012, experts show the elimination of the excessive budget deficit, with a that during the economic crisis, Poland has displayed reduction to 1 per cent of GDP by the end of its term of the fastest growth in GDP of all OECD member states. office (the plan is to reduce the public finance deficit to Assessing GDP in per capita terms, the report says that 2.97 per cent of GDP in 2012). The ratio of public debt »since 2005, Poland has been catching up with the EU15 to GDP is also to be reduced steadily. According to the countries twice as fast as at the start of this decade. government’s »Strategy for managing the public debt in However, one notes that despite the strong economic 2012–2015«, in 2012 the public debt will amount to PLN growth in the period 2010–2011, unemployment has 832.5 billion (52.4 per cent of GDP), in 2013 PLN 846.9 gradually risen to almost 10 per cent«.5 Economic policy billion (50.3 per cent of GDP), in 2014 PLN 864.8 billion hitherto has exploited the development opportunities (48.3 per cent of GDP) and in 2015 PLN 902.2 billion offered by access to EU funds. According to its leader, (47.4 per cent of GDP). The government will continue to the second PO term of office is to be a period of pro- reform the pension system and social security system for found structural reforms. The first half of 2012 will be farmers. From 2013, the retirement age for women and crucial to the success of the entire reform plan. men will be gradually equalised and also raised to 67. The gradual introduction of a new retirement age is sup- posed to encourage an energetic state policy in support Figure 2: GDP growth in Poland of the employment of older persons. The government compared to other OECD countries economic programme also calls for pension reforms in the uniformed services and fairer pensions for miners. Unjustified tax concessions and loopholes are to be elim- inated. Tax concessions are to be used to improve sup- port for child rearing and to encourage families to have more children. The tax concession for internet connec- tions will be abolished. The justification for this is that telecommunications services are becoming cheaper and the state is supporting the creation of a modern infor- mation network. According to the European Statistical Office, the fiscal burden of Poles in 2010 was almost 8 per cent of GDP below the EU average. The government regards low taxation as a permanent aspiration. A tax increase would be justifiable only by a need to ensure stable public finances in the short term. The government has adopted a straightforward macroeconomic policy: to permanently reduce public spending in the medium term (this does not apply to research and development and public investments), so that when the deficit in the public finance sector has fallen below 1 per cent, taxes can gradually be reduced (provisionally, as of 2015). An important element of government economic policy is new mechanisms of taxing revenues from agricultural production. From 2013, farms
Recommended publications
  • European Economic Congress 2015 Agenda
    1 Agenda of the European Economic Congress 2015 Inaugural session 20 April 2015 10.00-18.00 The difficult Europe The effects of the crisis still impact the performance of economies and public finances of many European states. The spectre of stagnation is still there. Europe is burdened with unemployment and the lack of prospects for young people. The formally united European Community has to contend with a scarcity of actual cohesion. Internal contradictions hamper joint action, undermine the competitiveness of the economy and block free market mechanisms. Political instability around Europe hampers development planning and impedes initiative. The future of our Europe is a set of difficult questions. The European Economic Congress will attempt to answer them. 10.00-10.10 Opening of the Congress and reception of Guests: – Wojciech Kuśpik – Chairman of the Board, PTWP SA, Initiator of the European Economic Congress – Piotr Litwa – Voivode of Silesia – Wojciech Saługa – Marshal of the Silesian Voivodeship – Marcin Krupa – Mayor of Katowice – Jerzy Buzek – Member of the European Parliament, President of the European Parliament between 2009-2012, Prime Minister of the Republic of Poland between 1997-2001, Chairman of the Council of the EEC 10.10-10.30 Inaugural speeches: – Bronisław Komorowski – President of the Republic of Poland – Andrej Kiska – President of the Slovak Republic 10.30-12.00 300 billion for the new Europe. The large-scale investment programme of the European Union How to break stagnation in the economy? Demographic, political and economic risks The capital, regulations and leverage: the mechanics of the new financial vehicle More freedom and more responsibility: a comparison with previously used investment support mechanisms The role of the European Commission, financial market institutions and private investors The need for wise priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Industry Interference with Tobacco Control Policies in Poland
    TC Online First, published on September 28, 2015 as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052582 Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052582 on 28 September 2015. Downloaded from Research paper Tobacco industry interference with tobacco control policies in Poland: legal aspects and industry practices Łukasz Balwicki,1 Michał Stokłosa,2 Małgorzata Balwicka-Szczyrba,3 Wioleta Tomczak4 ▸ Additional material is ABSTRACT has had only moderate success in implementing its published online only. To view Background Since 2006, when Poland ratified the WHO provisions. Poland’s tobacco control law underwent please visit the journal online Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), there revision in 2010 and 2011 to extend smoke-free (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ 5 tobaccocontrol-2015-052582). have been efforts to improve tobacco control regulation in areas and improve point-of-purchase regulation; the country. At the same time, at the European Union however, the scope of the revision has been greatly 1Department of Public Health and Social Medicine, Medical level, Poland took part in discussions over revision of the reduced during the legislative process. Despite rati- University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Tobacco Tax Directive and the Tobacco Products Directive. fying the WHO FCTC, many tobacco control regu- Poland This study aims to explore the tobacco industry’s tactics to lations still do not meet its requirements. For 2 Economic and Health Policy interfere with the creation of those policies. example, Poland still has partial smoke-free laws6 Research, American Cancer Methods Analysis of 257 documents obtained through and incomplete advertisement, promotion7 and Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 8 3Department of Civil Law, freedom of information request.
    [Show full text]
  • Polacy O Pracy Ministrów I Rekonstrukcji Rządu
    Warszawa, listopad 2013 BS/154/2013 POLACY O PRACY MINISTRÓW I REKONSTRUKCJI RZĄDU Znak jakości przyznany CBOS przez Organizację Firm Badania Opinii i Rynku 11 stycznia 2013 roku Fundacja Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej ul. Żurawia 4a, 00-503 Warszawa e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] http://www.cbos.pl (48 22) 629 35 69 W obecnym miesiącu miną dwa lata od zaprzysiężenia drugiego rządu premiera Donalda Tuska. Niemal od początku jego funkcjonowania nie cichną dywagacje na temat ewentualnych zmian personalnych, a od wielu miesięcy w mediach pojawiają się informacje o planach dotyczących poważnej rekonstrukcji. Pewne zmiany zapowiedział sam premier. W październikowym sondażu1 spytaliśmy Polaków o ocenę poszczególnych ministrów i stosunek do ewentualnej rekonstrukcji rządu. OCENA MINISTRÓW Na ranking najlepiej i najgorzej ocenianych ministrów duży wpływ ma stopień rozpoznawalności poszczególnych członków rządu. Mało znani ministrowie2 są rzadko wskazywani zarówno jako dobrzy, jak i źli ministrowie. Najlepiej ocenianym ministrem, dystansującym pozostałych członków rządu, jest minister spraw zagranicznych Radosław Sikorski (33%). Na drugim miejscu znalazł się minister kultury i dziedzictwa narodowego Bogdan Zdrojewski (17%). Niemal co ósmy Polak uważa, że najlepiej swoje obowiązki pełnią premier Donald Tusk (13%) i wicepremier Janusz Piechociński (12%). Piątym z najlepiej ocenianych ministrów jest minister administracji i cyfryzacji Michał Boni (10%). Stosunkowo niewielu Polaków za najlepszego ministra uznało kierującego resortem
    [Show full text]
  • 関西学院大学産業研究所 KG-SANKEN Discussion Paper No.12
    関西学院大学産業研究所 KG-SANKEN Discussion Paper No.12 KG- SANKEN DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES KG-SANKEN No.12 Multi-Layered Strategies in Global Governance Structure: Case of UNFCCC COP19 and the Coal and Climate Summit in Warsaw in 2013 関西学院大学産業研究所 副所長・ 准教授 市川 顕 Deputy Director & Associate Professor, Institute for Industrial Research, Kwansei Gakuin University 2015年 8月 関西学院大学産業研究所 Institute for Industrial Research, Kwansei Gakuin University 〒 662-8501 兵庫県西宮市上ケ原一番町1-155 TEL: 0798-54-6127 FAX: 0798-54-6029 E-mail: sanken@ kwansei.ac.jp URL: http://www.kwansei.ac.jp/i_industrial/index.html 1 Multi-Layered Strategies in Global Governance Structure: Case of UNFCCC COP19 and the Coal and Climate Summit in Warsaw in 2013 Akira ICHIKAWA Kwansei Gakuin University Associate Professor 1: Preface 1-1: Aim of the Paper Poland has abundant coal resources on its territory. This has led it since its accession to the EU to oppose the EU 1 ’s ambitious climate change and energy policies. In the negotiations on the so-called “Triple 20 directive” 2 of climate change targets to be achieved by 2020 - a 20% reduction in GHG 3 emissions compared to 1990 levels, raising the proportion of renewable energy in primary energy production to 20%, and a 20% increase in energy efficiency compared with 1990 - Poland was joined in its opposition by several of the other new member states. However, in the later negotiation on the “Energy Roadmap 2050”, which agreed on a 80-95% reduction in GHG emissions compared with 1990, only Poland vehemently opposed the plan. As a result, the country has become relatively isolated from the other EU member states in its energy and climate policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Steht Später Die Headline
    LÄNDERBERICHT Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. AUSLANDSBÜRO POLEN MAXIMILIAN HEDRICH DR. CHRISTIAN SCHMITZ www.kas.pl „Sieben auf einen Streich“ www.kas.de PREMIERMINISTER TUSK RÜSTET SICH FÜR DIE ZWEITE HÄLFTE SEINER Dezember 2013 AMTSZEIT Mit einer großen Kabinettsumbildung ist ungeschickt handelnden Regierungschefs, Polens Premierminister Donald Tusk in die der mit allen Mitteln versucht, seine Macht zweite Hälfte der Legislaturperiode ge- über die nächsten zwei Jahre zu retten. startet: Gleich sieben Kabinettsmitglieder Obendrein ist das Verhältnis zwischen den wurden ausgetauscht und durch neue Ge- Koalitionsparteien PO und der Bauernpartei sichter ersetzt. Doch ob daraus frischer PSL ramponiert. Premierminister Donald Wind entsteht, der die Bürgerplattform PO Tusk hatte seinen kleinen Partner mit der aus dem Umfragetief trägt, bleibt noch Entscheidung für eine Kabinettsumbildung abzuwarten. buchstäblich überrollt. Zwar wurde kein Mi- nisterium der PSL angerührt, aber das Al- Zustimmung für die Regierung auf Re- leinhandeln des Regierungschefs hat nun zu kordtief einer Vertrauenskrise der Koalitionspartner geführt. Eine Kabinettsumbildung zur Mitte der Le- gislaturperiode ist in Polen durchaus üblich, Der Grund für Tusks Handeln, so sind sich doch dass auf einen Schlag gleich sieben praktisch alle Beobachter einig, liegt in den Minister ausgetauscht werden, ist auch in miserablen Umfragewerten der regierenden Polen ungewöhnlich. Premierminister Do- konservativ-liberalen Bürgerplattform PO. nald Tusk hatte eine mögliche Umbildung Die Partei verliert seit Jahresbeginn deutlich zur Hälfte der Legislaturperiode schon vor an Boden und liegt derzeit bei ca. 19 Pro- geraumer Zeit in Aussicht gestellt, daher zent und somit deutlich hinter der größten reagierten die Öffentlichkeit sowie die Medi- Oppositionspartei Recht und Gerechtigkeit en wenig überrascht. PiS von Jarosław Kaczyński (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Mobility in Poland As a Business Opportunity Authors
    E-mobility in Poland as a business opportunity authors Krzysztof Bolesta Electric Vehicles Promotion Foundation [email protected] Marcin Korolec President of the Electric Vehicles Promotion Foundation [email protected] Agata Staniewska Consultant editor Rachel van Horn design Anna Olczak The report was commissioned by the Netherlands Embassy in Warsaw and the Netherlands Enterprise Agency. All rights reserved. Electric Vehicles Promotion Foundation is a Warsaw-based think tank established to accelerate the up-take of e-mobility in Poland. We run the Innovative Transport Forum, the biggest dialog platform for stakeholders interested in advancing the idea of e-mobility. We provide analytical services on demand. Warsaw, May 2018 E-mobility in Poland as a business opportunity Executive summary 9 The e-mobility market is growing fast. Sales Poland has grand ambitions for e-mobili- of new electric cars worldwide surpassed ty and legislation in place to enable their 1 million units in 2017, an increase of 54 per realization. But Poland lacks sufficient in- cent compared with 2016. The global stock centives for e-mobility uptake, which, as of electric cars surpassed 3 million units in research and experience has shown, is the 2017 after crossing the 2-million mark only prerequisite of rapid market growth. The in 2016. The spread of electric vehicles is Polish market has great economic poten- supported by climate action policy, rising tial due to its size and the importance of concerns over air quality in ever more con- the automotive sector for the country's gested cities, and also energy security. After economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Prezes Wyższego Urzędu Górniczego
    PREZES WYŻSZEGO URZĘDU GÓRNICZEGO Katowice, dnia ":3 czerwca 2013 r. PR.0201.116.2012 L.dz.11.b30 /06/2013/JR Działając na podstawie upoważnienia Ministra Środowiska z dnia 30 czerwca 2010 L, znak DGiKGug 018-l/30928/10/AW, udzielonego na podstawie § 6 ust. 3 uchwały nr 49 Rady Ministrów z dnia 19 marca 2002 r. - Regulamin pracy Rady Ministrów (M. P. Nr 13, poz. 221, z późno zm.), a także § 12 ust. l, 4 i 5 oraz § 16 ust. 2 tej uchwały, uprzejmie proszę o zajęcie stanowiska wobec projektu rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów w sprawie ustanowienia Odznaki Honorowej Zasłużonego dla Bezpieczeństwa w Górnictwie, ustalenia jej wzoru, zasad i trybu nadawania oraz sposobu nosze- nia (wersja z dnia 3 czerwca 2013 r.), udostępnionego, wraz z uzasadnieniem, oceną skutków regula- cji oraz wstępną opinią o zgodności projektu z prawem Unii Europejskiej, w Biuletynie Informacji Publicznej Rządowego Centrum Legislacji (na stronie internetowej Rządowego Procesu Legislacyjne- go), stosownie do § 11a powołanej uchwały. Projekt został umieszczony w Wykazie prac legislacyjnych i poza1egislacyjnych Rady Ministrów pod numerem RD168. Był on pierwotnie (nosząc inny tytuł: w sprawie ustanowienia odznaki honoro- wej "Zasłużony dla Bezpieczeństwa w Górnictwie ", ustalenia jej wzoru, zasad i trybu nadawania oraz sposobu noszenia) przedmiotem uzgodnień międzyresortowych w 2010 r. (pismo Prezesa Wyższego Urzędu Górniczego z dnia 7 września 2010 r., znak PRl020l/0127/1O/15276/JR). Ponadto w 2013 r. Komisja Heraldyczna zaopiniowała pozytywnie wzór Odznaki Honorowej Zasłużonego dla Bezpie- czeństwa w Górnictwie oraz zasady i tryb jej nadawania i noszenia, a Prezydent Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej wyraził zgodę na przedłożony wzór oraz sposób noszenia tej Odznaki.
    [Show full text]
  • Inconvenience Versus Rationality: Reflections on Different Faces Of
    OCTOBER 2018 C E G L A R Z E T A L . 821 Inconvenience versus Rationality: Reflections on Different Faces of Climate Contrarianism in Poland and Norway ANDRZEJ CEGLARZ Bavarian School of Public Policy, Technical University Munich, Munich, and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, and Renewables Grid Initiative, Berlin, Germany RASMUS E. BENESTAD Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway ZBIGNIEW W. KUNDZEWICZ Institute for the Agricultural and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan, Poland, and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany (Manuscript received 1 November 2017, in final form 9 August 2018) ABSTRACT There has been increasing scientific evidence related to climate change and its attribution, impacts, and possibilities of mitigation. Yet, climate contrarianism still persists. This paper concentrates on Poland and Norway—two fossil fuel giants that represent essential differences on climate contrarianism. In Norway there is a broad social and political consensus about the attribution and importance of climate change and a mo- tivation to undertake climate change mitigation measures, whereas in Poland the inconvenient truth on an- thropogenic climate change remains particularly inconvenient. By taking a qualitative approach, this paper discusses different drivers of climate contrarianism in both countries; provides examples of contrarian atti- tudes present in society, media, politics, and research; and compares their role in Polish and Norwegian contexts. The findings show the difficulties in defining universal factors determining contrarian attitudes, because their understanding and weight can be different among countries and a more nuanced analysis is needed to scrutinize different national contexts. The conclusion calls for more comparative research, which would combine quantitative and qualitative approaches investigating climate contrarianism.
    [Show full text]
  • Prezes Pansiwowej Agencji Atomistyki
    PREZES PANSIWOWEJ AGENCJI ATOMISTYKI P-PAAl596 12931 12011 Warszawa, dnia 20 grudnia 2011 r. wg rozdzielnika Oziatajqc na podstawie § 12 ust. 1 uchwaty Nr 49 Rady Ministraw z dnia 19 marca 2002 r. - Regulamin pracy Rady Ministraw (M. P. Nr 13, poz. 221 z pazn. zm .) oraz na podstawie upowai:nienia nr 33 Ministra Srodowiska z dnia 8 kwietnia 2011 r., przesytam w zaJqczeniu: 1) projekt rozporzqdzenia Rady Ministr6w w sprawie wymagan bezpieczenstwa jqdrowego i ochrony radiologicznej, jakie ma uwzg/~dniac projekt obiektu jqdrowego; 2) projekt rozporzqdzenia Rady Ministr6w w sprawie zakresu i sposobu przeprowadzania analiz bezpieczenstwa przeprowadzanych przed wystqpieniem z wnioskiem 0 wydanie zezwolenia na budow~ obiektu jqdrowego, oraz zakresu wst~pnego raportu bezpieczenstwa dla obiektu jqdrowego. Przedmiotowe projekty rozporzqdzen stanowiq wykonanie upowaznlen wynikajqcych z art. 36c ust. 3 oraz art. 36d ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 29 listopada 2000 r. - Prawo atomowe (Oz. U. z 2007 r. Nr 42, poz. 276, z pazn. zm.). Uprzejmie prosz~ 0 zgtoszenie ewentualnych uwag do projektaw przedmiotowych rozporzqdzen w terminie do dnia 03 stycznia 2012 r., pisemnie lub faksem na numer: 22 695 98 32. Niezaj~cie stanowiska w tym terminie uznam za brak zastrzei:en wobec projektaw. zafaczniki Rozdzielnik: 1. Pan Tomasz ARAB SKI Szef Kancelarii Prezesa Rady Ministr6w 2. Pan Jacek CICHOCKI Minister Spraw Wewncttrznych 3. Pan Waldemar PAWLAK - Wicepremier, Minister Gospodarki 4. Pan Jan VINCENT -ROSTOWSKI Minister Finans6w 5. Pani Krystyna SZUMILAS Minister Edukacji Narodowej 6. Pan Marek SAWICKI Minister Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi 7. Pani Elzbieta BIENKOWSKA Minister Rozwoju Regionalnego 8. Pan Joanna MUCHA Minister Sportu i Turystyki 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing EU Climate and Energy Policies in Poland: from Europeanization to Polonization?
    FNI Report 8/2014 Implementing EU Climate and Energy Policies in Poland: From Europeanization to Polonization? Jon Birger Skjærseth Implementing EU Climate and Energy Policies in Poland: From Europeanization to Polonization? Jon Birger Skjærseth [email protected] December 2014 Copyright © Fridtjof Nansen Institute 2014 Title Implementing EU Climate and Energy Policies in Poland: From Europeanization to Polonization? Publication Type and Number Pages FNI Report 8/2014 57 Author ISBN Jon Birger Skjærseth 978-82-7613-683-8 ISSN 1893-5486 Abstract This report examines Poland’s implementation of the EU climate and energy policy package to attain 2020 goals: the extent to which and how these policies have been implemented to date, why and with what consequences for Poland’s positions on new EU climate policies. Because unanimity is required on new long-term climate and energy policy goals, the relationship between the EU and Poland is crucial. Indigenous coal accounts for nearly 90% of the country’s electricity production and 50% of its total CO2 emissions. The first observation is that there have been significant implementation problems concerning the ETS, RES and CCS Directives. The EU package cannot be said to have been a ‘game changer’ – Poland has mainly opposed and absorbed the package to make it fit with existing policies and energy mix. Second, implementation challenges arise from EU adaptation pressure and ‘misfit’ with national policies, negotiating position and energy mix. Domestic politics has also proved important: The consistency in governmental prioritization of coal, opposition to climate policy by state-owned energy groups and privileged access to decision making for these groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Industry Interference with Tobacco Control Policies in Poland
    Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052582 on 28 September 2015. Downloaded from Research paper Tobacco industry interference with tobacco control policies in Poland: legal aspects and industry practices Łukasz Balwicki,1 Michał Stokłosa,2 Małgorzata Balwicka-Szczyrba,3 Wioleta Tomczak4 ▸ Additional material is ABSTRACT has had only moderate success in implementing its published online only. To view Background Since 2006, when Poland ratified the WHO provisions. Poland’s tobacco control law underwent please visit the journal online Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), there revision in 2010 and 2011 to extend smoke-free (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ 5 tobaccocontrol-2015-052582). have been efforts to improve tobacco control regulation in areas and improve point-of-purchase regulation; the country. At the same time, at the European Union however, the scope of the revision has been greatly 1Department of Public Health and Social Medicine, Medical level, Poland took part in discussions over revision of the reduced during the legislative process. Despite rati- University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Tobacco Tax Directive and the Tobacco Products Directive. fying the WHO FCTC, many tobacco control regu- Poland This study aims to explore the tobacco industry’s tactics to lations still do not meet its requirements. For 2 Economic and Health Policy interfere with the creation of those policies. example, Poland still has partial smoke-free laws6 Research, American Cancer Methods Analysis of 257 documents obtained through
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Group, Described the Progress of the Technical Group Over the Last Year
    CSLF-P-2010-09 CSLF-P-2010-09 Minutes of the Policy Group Meeting Warsaw, Poland Thursday, 07 October 2010 LIST OF ATTENDEES Policy Group Delegates Chair: Victor Der (United States) Australia: Bruce Murphy Brazil: Daniel Lins, Bernardo Stumm Canada: Siddiq McDoom China: Sizhen Peng, Xin Li European Commission: Wiktor Raldow France: Bernard Frois, Christian Oeser Greece: Nikolaos Koukouzas Italy: Sergio Garribba Japan: Hirotada Bessho, Noriaki Ozawa Korea: Shin Sung-Chul Mexico: José Miguel González Santaló Norway: Tone Skogen, Kristoffer Stabrun Poland: Piotr Kisiel Saudi Arabia: Abdulmuhsen Alsunaid, Khalid Abuleif South Africa: Faizel Mulla, Landi Themba United Arab Emirates: Keristofer Seryani United Kingdom: Jonathan Holyoak, Debbie Stockwell United States: James Wood CSLF Secretariat Barbara McKee, Jeffrey Price, Scott Miles Observers Poland: Erland Fjosna (Bellona), Andrzej Gula (Bellona), Marek Zaborowski (Bellona) United Kingdom: Luke Warren (Carbon Capture and Storage Association) United States: Jeffrey Jarrett (Leonardo Technologies Inc.), Paul Loeffelman (American Electric Power), Andrew Paterson (CCS Alliance), Justin Swift (Swift Global Solutions) Asian Development Bank: Ashok Bhargava, A. Damodaran, Klaus Gerhaeusser, Clement Yoong Global CCS Institute: Bob Pegler International Energy Agency: Juho Lipponen World Bank: Natalia Kulichenko World Energy Council: Elena Nekhaev 1 CSLF-P-2010-09 JOINT OPENING SESSION 1. Chair’s Statement Policy Group Chairman, Victor Der of the United States, welcomed delegates and observers to the seventh annual CSLF meeting and he thanked Deputy Prime Minister Waldemar Pawlak and the Government of Poland for their generous support and efforts in hosting the meeting. He stated the fact that the meeting was being hosted in Poland was indicative that Poland wants to be a leader in the global effort to meet the climate change challenge.
    [Show full text]