Extremism in Ukrainian Politics, Society, Media, Defense and Law Enforcement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Extremism in Ukrainian Politics, Society, Media, Defense and Law Enforcement www.cis-emo.net EXPERT REPORT EXTREMISM IN UKRAINIAN POLITICS, SOCIETY, MEDIA, DEFENSE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT ISSUE I June 2015 This project is funded with a government grant in accordance with ruling of the President of the Russian Federation № 243-RP as of July 25 2014 and based on a contest held by the National Charity Foundation Moscow 2015 Extremism in Ukrainian politics, society, media, defense and law enforcement. Expert report. Issue I. – М.: Commonwealth of the Independent States – Election Monitoring Organization CIS-EMO, 2015. – 256 p. ISBN www.cis-emo.net © Commonwealth of the Independent States – Election Monitoring Organization CIS-EMO, 2015 Head of the project: KOCHETKOV, Aleksey Vladimirovich is an inter- national expert who developed modern methods of monitoring electoral process and campaigns, head of the Commonwealth of the Independent States – Elec- tion Monitoring Organization CIS-EMO (2003-2013). Authors: BYSHOK, Stanislav Olegovich is a political analyst, graduate of the Psychology School of Lomonosov Mos- cow State University, author and coauthor of books on contemporary Russian and Ukrainian politics, student of Ukrainian nationalism. VALYAEV, Evgeniy Yuryevich is a lawyer, graduate of Law School of the Tax Academy of the Russian Fed- eration under the Ministry of Finance, political analyst, student of Russian and Ukrainian politics. KRUGLETSKIY, Oleg Vyacheslavovich is a psy- chologist, lecturer in military arts at Military Educa- tion School at Lomonosov Moscow State University, student of electoral process in the post-Soviet space. PROSTAKOV, Sergey Vadimovich is a graduate of Voronezh State University, student of regional politics, contemporary political and social protest. With participation of: ZHIVOV, Aleksey Alekseyevich is a political scien- tist, graduate of the School of Economics of Moscow State University of Economics, Statistics, and Infor- matics, graduated from Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration with a diploma of a lecturer in political sciences. KIREEV, Vladimir Konstantinovich is a PhD in phi- losophy, student of political process in the post-Soviet space. LAPSHIN, Sergey Andreyevich is a lawyer, gradu- ate of Law School of the Tax Academy of the Russian Federation under the Ministry of Finance. * * * Growing large-scale political, interethnic and so- cial confl icts is today’s global trend that fully affects the Russian Federation and entire Eurasia. The Ukrainian crisis that started with social unrest on the square of Maidan in the winter of 2013-2014 demonstrated vividly that radical groups’ threats aimed at disintegration of the post-Soviet space had acquired a distinct organized character in Ukraine. The coup d’état and snap presidential and parlia- mentary elections in the country have brought to power a large number of radical nationalist leaders. The Crimean crisis and military confl ict in Donbass proved that Ukrainian radicals had integrated into Ukraine’s government system gaining considerable clout primarily to control law enforcement (Ministry of Internal Affairs, Security Service of Ukraine and Armed Forces of Ukraine). Many volunteer military battalions in Ukraine are based on extremist organizations. Radical national- ist, anti-Russian sentiments have turned from mar- ginal groups into the political mainstream supported by the country leaders and the media. Monitoring political and ideological groups in the post-Soviet space is an important work to prevent extremist activity in Russia. A systemic approach by Russian state bodies and non-governmental organi- zations to working with Ukrainian counterparts re- quires objective data. Permanent monitoring whose data is to lay a basis for an information database on what has been happening and to reveal extremists trends is an important activity of the CIS-EMO. This work will form an important part of forecasting polit- ical tensions and instability in the post-Soviet space. CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................... Extremists in the Supreme Rada ................................... • Petro Poroshenko Bloc .......................................... • Batkivshchyna (Fatherland) All-Ukrainian Union ............................................. • People’s Front ....................................................... • Radical Party ......................................................... • Svoboda All-Ukrainian Union ............................... • Others: Dmytro Yarosh, Andriy Biletsky, Volodymyr Parasyuk, Boryslav Bereza, Semen Semenchenko ............................................ Street Activity of Extremists in Ukraine after the Maidan ......................................... • 2014 Snap Presidential Election ............................ • 2014 Snap Parliamentary Election ......................... • 2014-2015 “Dumpster Lustration” ........................ • 2015 May Holidays ................................................ Ukrainian Media as a Propaganda Tool .......................... • Manufacturing Hatred ........................................... • Justification of Genocide of Civilians and War Crimes ..................................................... • Russophobia and Extremism in the Media ............. • Freedom of Speech at Gunpoint ............................ Cooperation between Extremists and Security Services .................................................. Volunteer Battalions of Ukraine .................................... • Azov ..................................................................... • Aidar ..................................................................... • The Right Sector Volunteer Ukrainian Corps (DUK-PS) ............................................................ • Pogonia ................................................................. • “Chechen” Battalions ........................................... • Territorial battalions .............................................. Ì Dnipropetrovsk Oblast ........................................ Ì Kiev .................................................................. Ì Lugansk Oblast .................................................. Ì Kharkiv Oblast .................................................. Ì Chernihiv Oblast ................................................ Ì Vinnytsia Oblast ................................................ Ì Volhynia Oblast ................................................. Ì Zaporizhia Oblast .............................................. Ì Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast ..................................... Ì Kiev Oblast ........................................................ Ì Kirovohrad Oblast ............................................. Ì Lviv Oblast ........................................................ Ì Mykolaiv Oblast ................................................ Ì Odessa Oblast .................................................... Ì Poltava Oblast ................................................... Ì Rivne Oblast ...................................................... Ì Sumy Oblast ...................................................... Ì Ternopil Oblast .................................................. Ì Kherson Oblast .................................................. Ì Khmelnytskyi Oblast .......................................... • Volunteer Battalions as “Select Teams” of Extremists ............................. Conclusion ................................................................. Introduction Introduction October 26, 2014 saw snap parliamentary election to the Supreme Rada of Ukraine (also often Verk- hovna Rada or simply Rada). The elections were held with a mixed electoral system according to which 225 of 450 deputies were elected under party lists, while the other 225 in constituencies with FPTP. The election threshold for parties was 5%. The elections resulted in the Supreme Rada embracing the ideologies of Ukrai- nian nationalism, liberalism and anti-Russian rhetoric. The quality of parliamentary work and the ability to reach compromises inevitably suffered. Major charac- teristics of the new Ukrainian parliament include radi- calization, militarization and anti-Russian focus. With the Republic of Crimea entering the Russian Federation and the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics declared in the east of Ukraine1, only 198 deputies instead of 225 were elected in constituencies. The Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol used to have 12 single-member constituencies, while the territory of the Donetsk People’s Republic and the Lugansk People’s Republic had 9 and 6 respective- ly. The Supreme Rada elections came to be a stage in redesigning the system of government that began late autumn 2013. Russian, Ukrainian and European poli- ticians viewed the political crisis in Ukraine as a coup d’état or a “revolution of dignity.” According to post- 1. (Russian) А. Бедрицкий, С. Бышок, А. Кочетков. Демократия под огнём. Выборы в народных республиках Донбасса. – М.: Книжный мир, 2014. – 352 с. (Bedritskiy A, Byshok S., Kochetkov A. Democracy under Fire. ElecƟ ons in the people’s republics of Donbass. M. 2014) - 9 - Extremism in Ukrainian politics, society, media, defense and law enforcement Maidan authorities of the country, the snap parliamen- tary elections were to underpin the results of the revo- lution and to choose a parliament that would continue post-revolution reforms2. Changes in the Constitution of Ukraine after President Viktor Yanukovych had been toppled made the parliament of the country
Recommended publications
  • Public Broadcasting in Ukraine
    РОЗДІЛ 1 ДЕРЖАВНЕ МОВЛЕННЯ: ВІД ПРОПАГАНДИ ДО АДМІНРЕСУРСУ Svitlana Ostapa, Vadym Miskyi, Ihor Rozkladai under the general editorship of Natalia Lyhachova Svitlana Ostapa, Vadym Miskyi, Ihor Rozkladai Miskyi, Ihor Rozkladai Svitlana Ostapa, Vadym PUBLIC BROADCASTING IN UKRAINE: History of Creation and Challenges PUBLIC BROADCASTING IN UKRAINE: HISTORY OF CREATION AND CHALLENGES IN UKRAINE: HISTORY OF CREATION PUBLIC BROADCASTING 1 2 Svitlana Ostapa, Vadym Miskyi, Ihor Rozkladai under the general editorship of Natalia Lyhachova PUBLIC BROADCASTING IN UKRAINE: History of Creation and Challenges UDC 654.19 О 76 Production of this brochure was made possible with the financial support from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark and the Government of Sweden. The content of the brochure is the sole responsibility of Detector Media NGO and does not necessarily reflect the po- sition of the National Endowment for Democracy, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, or the Government of Sweden. S.V. Ostapa, V.V. Miskyi, I.Ye. Rozkladai under the general editorship of Natalia Lyhachova. О 76 Public broadcasting in Ukraine: History of Creation and Challenges. — Kyiv: VIOL PRINTING HOUSE LLC, 2018. — 168 p. Fig. Media experts directly involved in the establishment of the Public Broadcasting in Ukraine reveal the history of the transformation of state broadcasters into the National Public Broadcasting Company of Ukraine. It was a path from advocating for the legislation necessary for the formation of a legal entity and its first steps. This brochure also describes the main challenges faced by the National Public Broadcasting Company of Ukraine at the end of the first two years of its operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial by Nicolás Smirnoff
    WWW.PRENSARIO.TV WWW.PRENSARIO.TV //// EDITORIAL BY NICOLÁS SMIRNOFF CEE: ups & downs at the new digital era Central & Eastern Europe is going forward through the new digital era with its own tips. The region has suffered a deep crisis from 2008 to 2017- 2018, with many economies Prensario just standing up. This has International meant rare investment pow- er and long-term plans, but at the same time the change ©2018 EDITORIAL PRENSARIO SRL PAYMENTS TO THE ORDER OF moves fast and comparing to EDITORIAL PRENSARIO SRL other territories, CEE shows OR BY CREDIT CARD. REGISTRO NACIONAL DE DERECHO strong digital poles and de- DE AUTOR Nº 10878 velopment appeals. Argentina: In favor, most of the biggest broadcast- OTT platforms? It is what main broadcasters Las Casas 3535 ers are group of channels that include many of the world are doing, to compete better in CP: 1238 the new converged market and to generate Buenos Aires, Argentina countries, so it is easier to set up cross region- Tel: (+54-11) 4924-7908 al plans and to generate high-scale moves. proper synergies. If content business moves Fax: (+54-11) 4925-2507 On the opposite, there are many different to franchise management, it is important to USA: languages and audiences, so it is difficult to be flexible enough to any formula. 12307 SW 133 Court - Suite #1432 spread solutions that work to every context. This Natpe Budapest? It promises to be bet- Miami, Florida 33186-USA Phone: (305) 890-1813 Russia is a big Internet pole and now it is ter than last ones, with the region going up Email: [email protected] also a big production hub for international and the need of pushing more and more col- Website: www.prensario.tv companies setting up studios or coproduc- laborations.
    [Show full text]
  • Kremlin-Linked Forces in Ukraine's 2019 Elections
    Études de l’Ifri Russie.Nei.Reports 25 KREMLIN-LINKED FORCES IN UKRAINE’S 2019 ELECTIONS On the Brink of Revenge? Vladislav INOZEMTSEV February 2019 Russia/NIS Center The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental, non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. ISBN: 978-2-36567-981-7 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2019 How to quote this document: Vladislav Inozemtsev, “Kremlin-Linked Forces in Ukraine’s 2019 Elections: On the Brink of Revenge?”, Russie.NEI.Reports, No. 25, Ifri, February 2019. Ifri 27 rue de la Procession 75740 Paris Cedex 15—FRANCE Tel. : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00—Fax : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Email: [email protected] Website: Ifri.org Author Dr Vladislav Inozemtsev (b. 1968) is a Russian economist and political researcher since 1999, with a PhD in Economics. In 1996 he founded the Moscow-based Center for Post-Industrial Studies and has been its Director ever since. In recent years, he served as Senior or Visiting Fellow with the Institut fur die Wissenschaften vom Menschen in Vienna, with the Polski Instytut Studiów Zaawansowanych in Warsaw, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik in Berlin, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and the Johns Hopkins University in Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety and Solidarity for Journalists in Ukraine 2014
    Safety and Solidarity for Journalists in Ukraine 2014: A handbook for journalists unions facing a crisis 1 CREDITS Publisher: International Federation of Journalists International Press Centre, Résidence Palace Rue de La Loi, 155 Brussels: www.ifj.org No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the publisher. The contents are copyrighted and the rights to use any of the contributions rest with the authors themselves. Authors The handbook was prepared jointly by the International Federation of Journalists, the Independent Media Trade Union of Ukraine, The National Union of Journalists of Ukraine and the Russian Union of Journalists of Ukraine. The handbook was produced as one of the initiatives of the joint co-operation between the journalists unions from Ukraine and Russia in response to the crisis and war in Ukraine. The main authors were, Boris Timoshenko, Communications Head, Glasnost Defence Foundation, on behalf of the Russian Union of Journalists, Yuriy Lukanov, President IMTUU, on behalf of the IMTUU and NUJU and Oliver Money-Kyrle, IFJ Assistant General Secretary on behalf of IFJ and EFJ. It was edited by Oliver Money-Kyrle Special thanks to the Norwegian Journalists Union for supporting the production of this handbook. Cover photo journalists interviewing former Ukraine defence minister Valeriy Heletey in 2014 © Yuriy Lukanov Below, left to Right, Boris Timoshenko (GDF), Yuriy Lukanov (IMTUU), Sergey Tomilenko (NUJU), Nadezda Azhgikhina (RUJ) and Oliver Money-Kyrle (IFJ/EFJ 2 CONTENTS Preface: Jim Boumelha, President IFJ and Mogens Blicher Bjerregård, President EFJ 4 Introduction - Journalists Unions Responding to the Crisis 5 - Reporting from the Maidan: By Yuriy Lukanov 8 Reviewing the Casualties: A Joint Overview of Restrictions on the Media in Ukraine 2014: 12 - Freedom of movement - Detentions - Threats - Assaults - Deaths By Boris Timoshenko and Yuriy Lukanov Survival Tips from the Frontline - Recommendations of a Russian war Correspondent: 20 Arkady Babchenko - The Day the Separatists Came to Call.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens and the State in the Government-Controlled Territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions Problems, Challenges and Visions of the Future
    Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future Funded by: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union through International Alert. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of International Alert and UCIPR and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Layout: Nick Wilmot Creative Front cover image: A mother and daughter living in temporary accommodation for those displaced by the violence in Donetsk, 2014. © Andrew McConnell/Panos © International Alert/Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research 2017 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future October 2017 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 6 3. Findings 7 4. Statements from interviewees 22 5. Conclusions and recommendations 30 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions 3 1. INTRODUCTION The demarcation line (the line of contact)1 and the ‘grey zone’ between the government-controlled2 and uncontrolled territories3 of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions separates the parties to the conflict in the east of Ukraine. The areas controlled by the Ukrainian authorities and bordering the ‘grey zone’ are very politically sensitive, highly militarised, and fall under a special governance regime that is different from the rest of the country. In the absence of a comprehensive political settlement and amid uncertain prospects, it is unclear how long this situation will remain. It is highly likely that over the next few years, Ukrainians in areas adjacent to the contact line will live under very particular and unusual governance structures, and in varying degrees of danger.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Handbook
    KIEV, UKRAINE HANDBOOK Military Family Services Europe / MFS(E) Riga-Remote Team [email protected] www.cafconnection.ca / www.connexionfac.ca Date published: 20 June 2017 Date revised: 17 Feb 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS GREETINGS FROM YOUR MFS(E) RIGA-REMOTE TEAM 1 EUROPEAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE ............................ 3 USING THIS GUIDE .................................................... 4 SOME HELPFUL RESOURCES ....................................... 1 OVERVIEW OF KIEV ................................................... 2 Maps ............................................................................................................. 2 Geography/Politics .......................................................................................... 4 Climate ......................................................................................................... 4 Languages ..................................................................................................... 4 Religion ......................................................................................................... 5 Cost of Living ................................................................................................. 5 Canadian/Expat Community ............................................................................. 6 Cultural Nuances, Etiquette and Traditions ......................................................... 6 Public Holidays ............................................................................................... 9 News ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Crimea and the Kremlin: from Plan “A” to Plan “B”
    Crimea and the Kremlin: From Plan “A” to Plan “B” Translated by Arch Tait March 2015 This article is published in English by The Henry Jackson Society by arrangement with Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty. CRIMEA AND THE KREMLIN: FROM PLAN “A” TO PLAN “B” 1 Reconstructing events in east Ukraine and the rationale behind them. On 15 March, Crimea marked the first anniversary of the referendum on whether it wanted to be incorporated as Part of Russia. Shortly before,Vladimir Putin signed a decree instituting a new national holiday: SPecial OPerations Forces Day. This is to be celebrated on 27 February, the day in 2014 when the “little green men” embarked on their oPeration to seize key facilities in Crimea. The day before the announcement, Russian television aired a film titled “Crimea: the Path Back to the Homeland”, in which Putin describes taking the decision to begin the oPeration to annex the Peninsula. For all that, certain details about the oPeration and the Russian president’s motives remain obscure. We could do worse than get the answer to the question of why Putin decided to seize Crimea from the horse’s mouth, from Putin’s own sPeeches. He had listed his grievances at some length in a sPeech in the Kremlin on 18 March 2014. Not for the first time, he blamed the United States for “destroying the world order” and, in his view, stage-managing a whole succession of “coloured” revolutions. His main comPlaint was about NATO’s eastward expansion, “moving uP military infrastructure to our borders.” Because of this, he argued, “we have every reason to believe that the notorious Policy of containment of Russia, Pursued in the eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth centuries, continues to this day.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Country Report BTI 2018
    BTI 2018 Country Report Ukraine This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2018. It covers the period from February 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of political management in 129 countries. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2018 Country Report — Ukraine. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2018. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Contact Bertelsmann Stiftung Carl-Bertelsmann-Strasse 256 33111 Gütersloh Germany Sabine Donner Phone +49 5241 81 81501 [email protected] Hauke Hartmann Phone +49 5241 81 81389 [email protected] Robert Schwarz Phone +49 5241 81 81402 [email protected] Sabine Steinkamp Phone +49 5241 81 81507 [email protected] BTI 2018 | Ukraine 3 Key Indicators Population M 45.0 HDI 0.743 GDP p.c., PPP $ 8272 Pop. growth1 % p.a. -0.3 HDI rank of 188 84 Gini Index 25.5 Life expectancy years 71.2 UN Education Index 0.825 Poverty3 % 0.5 Urban population % 69.9 Gender inequality2 0.284 Aid per capita $ 32.3 Sources (as of October 2017): The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2017 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2016. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $3.20 a day at 2011 international prices. Executive Summary The period under review can be characterized by three major trends.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly, 2017
    INSIDE: l Manafort indictment welcomed in Ukraine – page 3 l Anne Applebaum at The Ukrainian Museum – page 4 l Roman Luchuk’s Carpathian landscapes at UIA – page 11 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal W non-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXXV No. 45 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2017 $2.00 Russian defense, intelligence companies Assassinations, abductions show Kremlin’s war targeted by new U.S. sanctions list on Ukraine extends beyond borders of Donbas by Mike Eckel ducer, VSMPO-AVISMA. U.S aircraft giant by Mark Raczkiewycz RFE/RL Boeing is a partner in that venture. The sanctions target one of Russia’s big- KYIV – A day after an Odesa-born medic WASHINGTON – The U.S. State gest and most successful industries. and sniper of Chechen heritage who fought Department has targeted more than three Reports have shown Russia is second only in the Donbas war was fatally shot, the dozen major Russian defense and intelli- to the United States in selling sophisticated Security Service of Ukraine detained the gence companies under a new U.S. sanc- arms around the world. alleged Kremlin-guided assassin of one of tions law, restricting business transactions A senior State Department official said their own high-ranking officials. with them and further ratcheting up pres- the sanctions could limit “the sale of It was the latest reminder for this war- sure against Moscow. The new list, released advanced Russian weaponry around the weary country of 42.5 million people that on October 27, came after weeks of mount- world.” the conventional battle in the easternmost ing criticism by members of Congress But the official denied that the intent of regions of the Donbas is being waged also accusing the White House of missing an the sanctions was to curb competition from nationwide asymmetrically through alleged October 1 deadline.
    [Show full text]
  • Euromaidan Values from a Comparative Perspective
    Social, Health, and Communication Studies Journal Contemporary Ukraine: A case of Euromaidan, Vol. 1(1), November 2014 MacEwan University, Canada National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Ukraine Ternopil State Medical University, Ukraine Article Euromaidan Values from a Comparative Perspective Sviatoslav Sviatnenko, graduate student, Maastricht University, Netherlands Dr. Alexander Vinogradov, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Ukraine Abstract Ukrainian revolution frequently called the “Euromaidan” changed Ukrainian society in 120 days and, later, became a regional conflict and a challenge to a global order. This primary social revolution was followed by value and paradigmatic shifts, middle class revolution, and a struggle for human rights, equality, justice, and prosperity. This study examines values and social structure of the Euromaidan. In addition to ethnographic study consisting of participant observations and informal interviewing, data from European Social Survey (2010-2013) and face-to-face survey conducted by an initiative group of sociologists on Maidan were used in order to approach this goal. Results of the study show that values of the Euromaidan (Universalism, Benevolence, Self-Direction, Stimulation, and Security) coincide more with European values, especially those of developed Western and Scandinavian countries, than Ukrainian ones. Furthermore, values of protesters find its reflection in deeply rooted Ukrainian identity. Moreover, Maidan was consisted of three major groups of protesters: “moralists,” “individualists,”
    [Show full text]
  • White Book on Violations of Human Rights and the Rule of Law in Ukraine (April 2014 — Mid-June 2014)
    WHITE BOOK ON VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE RULE OF LAW IN UKRAINE (APRIL 2014 — MID-JUNE 2014) OBL_Belaya kniga2_Eng.indd 1 08.07.2014 16:05:26 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation WHITE BOOK ON VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE RULE OF LAW IN UKRAINE (APRIL 2014 — MID-JUNE 2014) Moscow June 2014 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................. 5 Violations of human rights and the principle of the rule of law in the course of the so-called ‘anti-terrorist operation’ ............................... 7 Violations of the right to freedom of thought and belief, including political beliefs; the intimidation and kidnapping of political opponents .................................................................................29 Restrictions on freedom of the media and journalist activities............................................................................... 41 Tragedy in Odessa ...................................................................................... 51 The Snipers’ Case: a mock investigation, violation of the right to the presumption of innocence and of the right to a fair trial ....................................................................... 61 Ethnic and linguistic discrimination, xenophobia and aggressive nationalism. Instigation of racism ..................................... 67 Manifestations of religious intolerance, including threats to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate .................
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Chornobyl Chronology
    Chornobyl Chronology Last update: December 2008 This annotated chronology is based on the data sources that follow each entry. Public sources often provide conflicting information on classified military programs. In some cases we are unable to resolve these discrepancies, in others we have deliberately refrained from doing so to highlight the potential influence of false or misleading information as it appeared over time. In many cases, we are unable to independently verify claims. Hence in reviewing this chronology, readers should take into account the credibility of the sources employed here. Inclusion in this chronology does not necessarily indicate that a particular development is of direct or indirect proliferation significance. Some entries provide international or domestic context for technological development and national policymaking. Moreover, some entries may refer to developments with positive consequences for nonproliferation. Nuclear Waste: 2008-1995 OVERVIEW Spent fuel is generally stored on site in cooling ponds at the nuclear power plants at which the fuel assemblies were used. Ukraine previously sent its spent fuel to Russia to be reprocessed, but this course became a contentious issue after Russia passed a law in 1992 prohibiting the import of radioactive material into Russia. This action resulted in storage crisis at Ukrainian power plants. In 6/93, however, Russia passed a new law that allows Ukrainian spent fuel to be reprocessed, but not stored, in Russia. The law does not allow the import of nuclear waste into Russia, but allows the import of Russian-origin spent fuel as long as the resulting waste is returned to the territory of the state which delivered it.
    [Show full text]