OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopy
Co-Chairs: Charles A. Goldfarb, MD, Pak-cheong Ho, MD, and Francisco del Piñal, MD
Program Syllabus
75TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSH OCTOBER 1 – 3, 2020
822 West Washington Blvd Chicago, IL 60607 Phone: (312) 880-1900 Web: www.assh.org Email: [email protected]
All property rights in the material presented, including common-law copyright, are expressly reserved to the speaker or the ASSH. No statement or presentation made is to be regarded as dedicated to the public domain.
OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopy Please note that in order to receive CME for this session, you will need to view this in the ASSH Learning Management System.
This Precourse is designed to explore the arthroscopic treatment of wrist pathology, specifically focused on the athlete. We will explore arthroscopic treatment of wrist fractures, ligament injuries, TFCC tears, and dislocations of the wrist and hand. We will include videos of clinical findings and wrist arthroscopic findings/ treatments. Experts from around the world will share new perspectives and cutting-edge treatments.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES At the conclusion of this program, the attendee will:
• Describe the arthroscopic anatomy of the wrist joint. • Understand classification systems affecting wrist arthroscopy and patient outcomes. • View and incorporate into your practice advanced arthroscopic techniques for fractures and ligament injuries.
CME CREDIT HOURS
The ASSH designates this live activity for a maximum of 4.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits TM. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
The ASSH is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
PRE/POST EVENT – Learner Assessment The Pre-event Assessment was sent electronically to the email you have on file. The Post-event notification will be sent using the same method. Please check your email 24 hours after this course for a message from ASSH with access instructions and information.
You are encouraged to complete the post-event assessment even if you did not participate in the pre-event assessment. If you experience difficulty completing the post-event assessment online please email [email protected] or call (312) 880-1900.
According to standards established by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the ASSH is required to assess learning from participation in Continuing
All property rights in the material presented, including common-law copyright, are expressly reserved to the speaker or the ASSH. No statement or presentation made is to be regarded as dedicated to the public domain. Medical Education events. To address these standards, the Hand Society uses pre-and post-tests for all of its courses. These questions are used to evaluate the knowledge of course participants before attending a program and again after the course to see if improvements were made.
DISCLAIMER The material presented in this continuing medical education program is being made available by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand for educational purposes only. This material is not intended to represent the best or only methods or procedures appropriate for the medical situation discussed; rather the material is intended to present an approach, view, statement or opinion of the authors or presenters, which may be helpful, or of interest to other practitioners.
The attendees agree to participate in this medical education program, sponsored by ASSH with full knowledge and awareness that they waive any claim they may have against ASSH for reliance on any information presented in this educational program. In addition, the attendees also waive any claim they have against the ASSH for injury or other damage that may result in any way from their participation in this program.
All of the proceedings of the 75th Annual Meeting, including the presentation of scientific papers, are intended for limited publication only, and all property rights in the material presented, including common-law copyright, are expressly reserved to the speaker or the ASSH. No statement or presentation made is to be regarded as dedicated to the public domain. Any sound reproduction, transcript or other use of the material presented at this course without the permission of the speaker or the ASSH is prohibited to the full extent of common-law copyright in such material.
The ASSH is not responsible for expenses incurred by an individual who is not confirmed and for whom space is not available at the meeting. Costs incurred by the registrant such as airline or hotel fees or penalties are the responsibility of the registrant.
The approval of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is required for procedures and drugs that are considered experimental. Instrumentation systems discussed and/or demonstrated in or at ASSH educational programs may not yet have received FDA approval.
All property rights in the material presented, including common-law copyright, are expressly reserved to the speaker or the ASSH. No statement or presentation made is to be regarded as dedicated to the public domain.
Claim your CME hours through www.ASSH.org
How to Claim: By viewing on-demand content in the LMS and completing the test questions when prompted, you will automatically be awarded your CME credit and have the ability to download your certificate immediately. No additional steps are needed.
Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. *Please note that ASSH does not provide Continuing Education for physical therapists. Visit the APTA website for more information.
Questions? Problems? Contact the American Society for Surgery of the Hand at (312) 880-1900 or by email at [email protected].
Conflict of Interest Disclosures for 2020 Program Committee and Course Faculty
Program Faculty & Disclosures The American Society for Surgery of the Hand gratefully acknowledges those who have generously volunteered considerable time and effort to plan, organize and present this CME course. The ASSH appreciates the faculty’s dedication to teaching, their support of the ASSH mission, and their significant contribution to the educational success of this program. The following is a list of disclosures for all participating faculty and program staff.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY According to the ASSH conflict of interest policy, individuals involved in continuing medical education activities are required to complete a disclosure statement. The ASSH acknowledges this fact solely for the information of the listener. Non-conflicted reviewers have examined, documented and resolved financial relationship disclosures for this course content.
Financial Disclosure – represented by ● Instructors, planners, content reviewers and managers who affect the content of a CME/CE activity are required to disclose financial relationships they have with commercial interests (i.e. any entity producing, marketing, pre-selling, or distribution health care goods or services consumed by, or used on, patients) associated with this activity.
FDA Disclosure – represented by ▲ Some drugs or medical devices demonstrated at this course may have not been cleared by the FDA or have been cleared by the FDA for specific purposes only. The FDA has stated that it is the responsibility of the physician to determine the FDA clearance status of each drug or medical device he or she wishes to use in clinical practice.
The ASSH policy provides that “off label” uses of a drug or medical device may be described in the ASSH CME activities so long as the “off label” use of the drug or medical device is also specifically disclosed (i.e., it must be disclosed that the FDA has not cleared the drug or device for the described purpose). Any drug or medical device is being used “off label” if the described use is not set forth on the product’s approval label.
Planners 2020 Annual Meeting Program Chairs Dawn M. LaPorte, MD No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose
Ryan P. Calfee, MD, MSc No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose
Session Co-Chairs/Moderators Charles A. Goldfarb, MD ● Non-CME Services: Acumed
Pak-cheong Ho, MD No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose
Francisco del Piñal, MD No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose
Faculty Keiji Fujio, MD No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose
David Hargreaves, MBBS No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose
Jan-Ragnar Haugstvedt, MD ● Consulting Fees: Arthrex, Medartis ● Non-CME Services: Arthrex
Guillaume Herzberg, MD, PhD ● Royalty: Groupe Lepine Company
Sanjeev Kakar, MD, FAOA ● Royalty: Arthrex ● Consulting Fees: Arthrex ● Ownership Interests: Sonex
Toshiyasu Nakamura, MD, PhD No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose
Juitien Shih, MD No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose Steven S. Shin, MD ● Royalty: Arthrex Hely & Weber ● Consulting Fees: Arthrex ● Speakers Bureau: Arthrex
David J. Slutsky, MD No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose
Clara W. Wong, FRCS No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose
Jeffrey Yao, MD ● Royalty: Arthrex ● Intellectual Property: Arthrex, Elevate Braces ● Speakers Bureau: Depuy-Synthes, Trice/Segway, Exsomed ● Ownership Interests: Elevate Braces, 3D Systems OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopy Co-Chairs: Charles A. Goldfarb, MD, Pak-cheong Ho, MD, and Francisco del Piñal, MD
Description
Please note that in order to receive CME for this session, you will need to view this in the ASSH Learning Management System.
This Precourse is designed to explore the arthroscopic treatment of wrist pathology, specifically focused on the athlete. We will explore arthroscopic treatment of wrist fractures, ligament injuries, TFCC tears, and dislocations of the wrist and hand. We will include videos of clinical findings and wrist arthroscopic findings/ treatments. Experts from around the world will share new perspectives and cutting-edge treatments.
Learning Objectives At the conclusion of this program, the attendee will:
• Describe the arthroscopic anatomy of the wrist joint. • Understand classification systems affecting wrist arthroscopy and patient outcomes. • View and incorporate into your practice advanced arthroscopic techniques for fractures and ligament injuries.
Program
Session Chair(s) Charles A. Goldfarb, MD | Pak-cheong Ho, MD | Francisco del Piñal, MD
5 Minutes Welcome and Introduction Charles A. Goldfarb, MD | Pak-cheong Ho, MD | Francisco del Piñal, MD
10 Minutes Anatomy, Portals David J. Slutsky, MD
15 Minutes Distal radius fractures Francisco del Piñal, MD
15 Minutes Scaphoid fracture and non-unions Clara W. Wong, FRCS
15 Minutes Acute and Subacute SL Injury Juitien Shih, MD
15 Minutes Chronic S-L dissociation Pak-cheong Ho, MD
15 Minutes Acute and Chronic LT Injury Jan-Ragnar Haugstvedt, MD
12 Minutes Perilunate fracture- dislocations Guillaume Herzberg, MD, PhD
7 Minutes Dorsal Impingement Jeffrey Yao, MD
16 Minutes Cases/Questions/Discussion/Break All Faculty
15 Minutes Ulnocarpal impaction and arthroscopic wafer Sanjeev Kakar, MD, FAOA
15 Minutes TFCC: Diagnosis (exam, imaging) and Classification Toshiyasu Nakamura, MD, PhD
15 Minutes TFCC injury without instability Charles A. Goldfarb, MD
15 Minutes TFCC injury with instability Keiji Fujio, MD
12 Minutes Midcarpal Instability David Hargreaves, MBBS
5 Minutes CMC fracture- dislocation, Small Joint Arthroscopy Steven S. Shin, MD
18 Minutes Cases/Questions/Closing Comments All Faculty
OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopy
10 Minutes
Anatomy, Portals
David J. Slutsky, MD No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose
75TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSH OCTOBER 1 - 3, 2020
7/27/2020
OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopy
Course Chairs: Charles A. Goldfarb, MD, Pak-cheong Ho, MD and Francisco del Piñal, MD Faculty: Keiji Fujio, MD, David Hargreaves, MBBS, Jan-Ragnar Haugstv edt, MD, Guillaume Herzberg, MD, PhD, Toshiyasu Nakamura, MD, PhD, Juitien Shih, MD, Steven S. Shin, MD, David J. Slutsky, MD, Sanjeev Kakar, MD, FAOA, Clara W. Wong, FRCS and Jeffrey Yao, MD
1
DISCLOSURES
David J. Slutsky, MD
Speaker has no relevant financial relationships with commercial interest to disclose.
2
ASSH PRECOURSE 09 FUNDAMENTAL TO CUTTING EDGE: ROLE OF ARTHROSCOPY
WRIST ARTHROSCOPY PORTALS
David J. Slutsky MD
The Hand & Wrist Institute Torrance, CA
3
1 7/27/2020
David J . Slutsky M.D.
I have no potential conflicts with this presentation
4
5
6
2 7/27/2020
7
4,5
6R
8
Midcarpal portals
9
3 7/27/2020
Midcarpal portals
10
STT portal
11
12
4 7/27/2020
13
1,2 Portal
14
Volar Radial (VR)
15
5 7/27/2020
16
17
18
6 7/27/2020
19
20
21
7 7/27/2020
DRUJ OA
22
8 OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopy
15 Minutes
Distal radius fractures
Francisco del Piñal, MD No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose
75TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSH OCTOBER 1 - 3, 2020
Speaker has not provided a handout for
this presentation OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopy
15 Minutes
Scaphoid fracture and non-unions
Clara W. Wong, FRCS No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose
75TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSH OCTOBER 1 - 3, 2020
Speaker has not provided a handout for
this presentation
OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopy
15 Minutes
Acute and Subacute SL Injury
Juitien Shih, MD No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose
75TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSH OCTOBER 1 - 3, 2020
Speaker has not provided a handout for
this presentation OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopy
15 Minutes
Chronic S-L dissociation
Pak-cheong Ho, MD No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose
75TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSH OCTOBER 1 - 3, 2020
Speaker has not provided a handout for
this presentation OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopy
15 Minutes
Acute and Chronic LT Injury
Jan-Ragnar Haugstvedt, MD ● Consulting Fees: Arthrex, Medartis ● Non-CME Services: Arthrex
75TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSH OCTOBER 1 - 3, 2020
7/27/2020
1
75th ASSH Virtual Annual Meeting, September 29-October 3, 2020
Acute and Chronic LT Jan Ragnar Haugstvedt, MD, PhD injury Østfold Hospital Trust, Moss, Norway
2
Acute and Chronic LT injury
LT tears is 15-20 % as common as SL injuries
Part of a more extensive injury, often missed diagnosis; true incidence is unknown...
3
1 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
Martin Langer
4
Acute and Chronic LT injury
J Hand Surg Am. 1999 Sept;24(5):953-62. Constraint and material properties of the subregions of the scapholunate interosseous ligament. Berger RA, Imeada T, Berglund L, An KM
J Hand Surg Am. 1998 May;23(3):425-31. Lunotriquetral ligament properties: a comparison of three anatomic subregions. Ritt MJ, Bishop AT, Berger RA, Linscheid RL, Berglund LJ, An KN.
5
Acute and Chronic LT injury Mechanism of injury
6
2 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury Symptoms
Be suspicious when you hear about the history of injury
Symptoms often intermittent
Prominent in special positions (ulnar deviation or pronation)
“Clunk” https://www.dinside.no/bilder/luftig-svev/62323484
Foto: All Over Press/Cameron Spencer
7
Acute and Chronic LT injury Examination
LT tests
8
Acute and Chronic LT injury Examination
LT Ballottement
From “Arthroscopic Management of Ulnar Pain”, Springer, 2012 9
3 7/27/2020
LT ballottement Reagan Linscheid
10
Acute and Chronic LT injury Examination
LT Shear test
From “Arthroscopic Management of Ulnar Pain”, Springer, 2012 11
LT Shear test (Kleinman)
12
4 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury Examination
Proximal Row Compression test
From “Arthroscopic Management of Ulnar Pain”, Springer, 2012 13
Acute and Chronic LT injury Examination
Proximal Row Compression test
From “Arthroscopic Management of Ulnar Pain”, Springer, 2012 14
Proximal Row Compression test
15
5 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury Examination
Derby test
Courtesy: Marc Garcia-Elias 16
Acute and Chronic LT injury Examination
Derby test
Courtesy: Marc Garcia-Elias 17
Derby test Support Pisiform. Test LT
18
6 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury Examination
Radiological examination
CT
MRI
Arthrography
Video
Arthroscopy
19
Acute and Chronic LT injury
Gilula’s lines
From “Arthroscopic Management of Ulnar Pain”, Springer, 2012 20
Acute and Chronic LT injury
Gilula’s lines
From “Arthroscopic Management of Ulnar Pain”, Springer, 2012 21
7 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
Courtesy: Toshi Nakamura 22
Acute and Chronic LT injury
Courtesy: Jörg von Schoonhoven 23
Acute and Chronic LT injury
Courtesy: Jörg von Schoonhoven 24
8 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
Arthroscopy has become a new standard for diagnosing and treatment
25
Acute and Chronic LT injury
From “Arthroscopic Management of From “Arthroscopic Management of Ulnar Pain”, Springer, 2012 Ulnar Pain”, Springer, 2012
T T L L
Capitate
Scaphoid
Lunate Triquetrum
26
Acute and Chronic LT injury Staging
•Stage I: interosseous lig
•Stage II: interosseous lig and palmar LT lig
•Stage III: Complete disruption
27
9 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
J Hand Surg Am. 1990 Mar;15(2):268-78. Ulnar-sided perilunate instability: an anatomic and biomechanic study. Viegas SF, Patterson RM, Peterson PD, Pogue DJ, Jenkins DK, Sweo TD, Hokanson JA.
•Stage I: interosseous lig
•Stage II: interosseous lig and palmar LT lig
•Stage III: Complete disruption
Most LT lig injuries are found to be dynamic 28
Acute and Chronic LT injury Treatment
The goal is to reestablish normal alignment and stability
From a brace to an advanced surgical procedure
The type of treatment could depend on time from injury, the extent of injury, the patient’s needs, available equipment and/or the skill of the surgeon
Arthroscopically assisted surgery or Open surgery
There are (to my knowledge) no randomised prospective studies evaluating different treatment options (evidence based)
Recommendations are based on studies, case reports, retrospective studies, and my own experience
29
Acute and Chronic LT injury Treatment
An acute injury;
well-molded cast, immobilization for 8 weeks, prevent forearm rotation at least the first 4 weeks
https://www.google.com/search?q=forearm+in+a+cast&client=firefox-b-d&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj PgJDP1M_qAh Xiw8Q BHU3ECFAQ_AUoAXo ECAwQAw#imgrc=ar8R8DtyEo9TsM
https://www.google.com/search?q=long+arm+cast&client=firefox -b-d&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi0vseX1c_qAhWF4aYKHbLJDDMQ_AUoAXoEC AwQAw &biw=1280&bih=677#i mgrc=3BGSu MS0zzREKM 30
10 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury Treatment
An Acute injury; less An acute injury; than 6 (-12) weeks
In the literature; injuries older than 5 yrs have been treated as an acute injury
31
Acute and Chronic LT injury
ACUTE INJURIES…
32
Acute and Chronic LT injury
From “Arthroscopic Management of Ulnar Pain”, Springer, 2012 33
11 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
34
Acute and Chronic LT injury
From “Arthroscopic Management of Ulnar Pain”, Springer, 2012 35
Acute and Chronic LT injury
36
12 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
37
Acute and Chronic LT injury
Make a skin incision. Debride. Use a drill guide for K-wires
38
Acute and Chronic LT injury
Create a fibrodesis 39
13 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
OLD INJURIES…
ARTRODESIS or… 40
Acute and Chronic LT injury
OLD INJURIES…
… or LIG RECONSTRUCTION 41
Acute and Chronic LT injury
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 Sep;83(7):1023-8. Treatment of isolated injuries of the lunotriquetral ligament. A comparison of arthrodesis, ligament reconstruction and ligament repair. Shin AY, Weinstein LP, Berger RA, Bishop AT.
Lig repair (27)
Ligament reconstruction (8)
Arthrodesis (22)
15,4-53,5 yrs, subacute or chronic in 98,2 %, FU 2-22 yrs 42
14 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
43
Acute and Chronic LT injury
44
Acute and Chronic LT injury
45
15 7/27/2020
46
Acute and Chronic LT injury
47
48
16 7/27/2020
49
50
Acute and Chronic LT injury
51
17 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
52
Acute and Chronic LT injury
53
Acute and Chronic LT injury
54
18 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
55
Acute and Chronic LT injury
56
Acute and Chronic LT injury
57
19 7/27/2020
Palmar side
Lunate
Triquetrum
58
Acute and Chronic LT injury
59
Acute and Chronic LT injury
60
20 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
61
Acute and Chronic LT injury
62
Acute and Chronic LT injury
63
21 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
64
65
Acute and Chronic LT injury
66
22 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
67
68
Acute and Chronic LT injury
69
23 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
70
71
Acute and Chronic LT injury
72
24 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
73
74
Acute and Chronic LT injury
75
25 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
76
Acute and Chronic LT injury
77
Acute and Chronic LT injury
78
26 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
79
Acute and Chronic LT injury
80
Acute and Chronic LT injury
81
27 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
Before… After…
82
Acute and Chronic LT injury
Arthroscopic assisted LT lig reconstruction
We’ve been able to do only two cases with more than 30 months FU
Man born 1993 Man born 1961
Manual heavy worker White collar
Surgery Sept 2017 Surgery Nov 2017
Preop Q-DASH: Rest Work Preop Q-DASH: Rest Work 31 100 61 75
Postop Q-DASH: 6.8 0 Postop Q-DASH: 23 0 83
Acute and Chronic LT injury
Arthroscopic assisted LT lig reconstruction
We’ve been able to do only two cases with more than 30 months FU
Man born 1993 Man born 1961
Manual heavy worker White collar
Surgery Sept 2017 Surgery Nov 2017
Preop Q-DASH: Rest Work Preop Q-DASH: Rest Work 31 100 61 75
Postop Q-DASH: 6.8 0 Postop Q-DASH: 23 0 84
28 7/27/2020
Acute and Chronic LT injury
Arthroscopic assisted LT lig reconstruction
We’ve been able to do only two cases with more than 30 months FU
Man born 1993 Man born 1961
Manual heavy worker White collar
Surgery Sept 2017 Surgery Nov 2017
Preop Q-DASH: Rest Work Preop Q-DASH: Rest Work 31 100 61 75
Postop Q-DASH: 6.8 0 Postop Q-DASH: 23 0 85
Acute and Chronic LT injury Summary
LT injuries are difficult to diagnose
Arthroscopy is the gold standard for diagnosing ligament injuries
Treatment of acute injuries: K-wires and immobilization
Treatment of chronic injuries; reconstruction (or arthrodesis)
86
Thank you
87
29 OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopy
12 Minutes
Perilunate fracture- dislocations
Guillaume Herzberg, MD, PhD ● Royalty: Groupe Lepine Company
75TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSH OCTOBER 1 - 3, 2020
DISCLOSURES
Guillaume Herzberg, MD
Royalty: Groupe Lepine Company
1
Arthroscopic Treatment of Perilunate Injuries
Guillaume Herzberg, Marion Burnier, Lyon, France
ASSH Precourse 09 – Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopyy- 2020 – No Conflicts 2
Arthroscopic Treatment of Perilunate Injuries
Definitions
Why ?
When ?
Results ?
3
1 Acute Prerilunate Injuries: Definitions
4
Floating Lunate Transosseous PLIND
5
6
2 Why ?
7
8
Arthroscopy for Perilunate Injuries
When ?
9
3 Provide an ID To Perilunate Injuries
10
I.D. 1
11
Immediate Mid- Carpal Closed Reduction Perilunate ID-1
Relieves Median Nerve
12
4 Immediate Mid- Carpal Closed Reduction
CTS +++
OZIER
13
Immediate Mid- Carpal Closed Reduction
Perilunate ID-1
24/48h Surgical Repair
ORIF AARIF ARIF
14
Scaphoid Intact ORIF Trans-Scapho
15
5 16
17
Dry Arthroscopy (Del Pinal) + Automatic Wash-Outs
18
6 Dry Arthroscopy (Del Pinal) + Automatic Wash-Outs
19
AARIF CR
OZIER
I.D.
dorsal TS PLFD stage 1 (Greater Arc ) 20
OZIER Radial Ulnar
21
7 AARIF
OZIER
22
OZIER
23
OZIER
24
8 ARIF
25
Toubal
I.D. dorsal TS-PLFD stage I (Greater Arc)
26
CR
Toubal
I.D.
27
9 ARIF
Radial Ulnar
28
CR
Toubal
I.D. ARIF
29
ORIF (So Far Gold Standard)
Lesser Arc Greater Arc
Trumble 2004: Knoll-Trumble 2005:
22 dorsal PLD 25 TS Dorsal -PLFD
Combined Approaches ORIF Dorsal Approach 4 years F-Up 4 years F-Up
No Pain No Pain Flex-Ext 106° Flex-Ext 113° Grip 77% Grip 77%
« Almost normal » 100% Scaphoid Union SL Relationships No Carpal Malalignment No Carpal Collapse, no DISI
30
10 All-Arthroscopic RIF (ARIF)
Wong 2008 Kim 2015 Liu 2015
21 TS Dorsal -PLFD, 15 TS Dorsal -PLFD, 20 TS Dorsal -PLFD, 5 Dorsal PLD IIA 4 Dorsal PLD IIA 3 year F-Up Mean 31 Months F-Up Mean 15 Months F-Up Mayo avg 80 Mayo avg 79 Mayo avg 86 1/21 Scaphoid non Union 1/21 Carpal Malalignment 2/15 Scaphoid non Union 1/20 Scaphoid non Union
31
AARIF / ARIF
Our Series 2015:
10 Dorsal PLD 4 TS Dorsal –PLFD 4 PLIND
Mean 27 Months F-Up 12 AARIF Flex-Ext 80° Grip 69% 6 Pure ARIF Mayo avg 71 Normal Carpal Alignment 100% Scaphoid non Union in TS
32
romieu
I.D. tisserand koudry 2
33
11 romieu
I.D. tisserand koudry 2
Closed Reduction Not Indicated
34
Immediate ORIF tisserand
tisserand
Dorsal
35
Salvage Procedure
ROMIEU romieu
36
12 Irreparable / Free Carpal Bone(s)
romieu
I.D. 2
Emergency Informed Consent
37
Summary
38
« Be Prepared to Any Perilunate Variant»
39
13 « Include Arthroscopy in your PLI Management »
40
I.D. I.D. 1 2
Arthroscopy No Arthroscopy
41
42
14 Arthroscopic Treatment of Perilunate Injuries
Guillaume Herzberg, Marion Burnier, Lyon, France Thank You 43
15 OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopy
7 Minutes
Dorsal Impingement
Jeffrey Yao, MD ● Royalty: Arthrex ● Intellectual Property: Arthrex, Elevate Braces ● Speakers Bureau: Depuy-Synthes, Trice/Segway, Exsomed ● Ownership Interests: Elevate Braces, 3D Systems
75TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSH OCTOBER 1 - 3, 2020
6/30/20
Introduction
• Dorsal Wrist Syndrome aka Dorsal Wrist Impingement Syndrome • Kirk Watson, 1993 • Pain in dorsal central wrist Dorsal Wrist Impingement • Exacerbated with wrist hyperextension Jeffrey Yao, MD • Yoga, pushups, gymnastics Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery Stanford University Medical Center
1 2
Anatomy Dorsal Capsuloscapholunate Septum (DCSS)
• Mathoulin C (Hand Surg and Rehab 2016)
3 4
Scapholunate Stability A Spectrum of Disease
C C DIC/DST DCSS L S DSL
R R
Prominent role of dorsal radiocarpal ligaments: DIC/DRC Dorsal Scapholunate Ligament Thanks, Abhijeet Dorsal Capsulo-Scapholunate Septum (DCSS) Wahegaonkar, MD Watson HK and Sorelle J from Slutsky’s Principles and Practice of Wrist Surgery, 2010
5 6
1 6/30/20
Classic Symptoms Physical Examination
• T
Thanks, Martin Caloia, MD Thanks, Martin Caloia, MD
7 8
Imaging Treatment of Dorsal Wrist Impingement
• Xrays and MRI are often normal • Activity Modification • Avoidance of wrist hyperextension and axial loading • Pushups, yoga • Immobilization • 4 weeks • Corticosteroid injection • Surgery… Wrist Arthroscopy!
9 10
Left Wrist 3-4 portal looking ulnar Left Wrist 4-5 portal looking radial
11 12
2 6/30/20
Debridement of Synovitis and Frayed Capsule
13 14
Following Debridement Thermal Treatment of dSLIL, DCSS
15 16
Denervation Effect Clinical Outcomes
Pirolo and Yao, Arthroscopy 2016
17 18
3 6/30/20
Clinical Outcomes Spectrum of Disease: Ganglion
• Martin Caloia, MD (Buenos Aires) • 17 cases DCSS • Quick DASH: 44.1 to 5 • MWS: 50 to 87.9 • VAS: 6.8 to 1.2 • Grip Strength: 85% contralateral wrist • Complications: 2 (loss of flexion, Ganglion transient DRSN) Stalk
19 20
Arthroscopic Excision Conclusion
• Dorsal Wrist Syndrome aka Dorsal Wrist Impingement Syndrome • Pain in dorsal central wrist • Exacerbated with wrist hyperextension • Immobilization, steroid injections • Arthroscopic debridement works!
21 22
Thank You!
23
4 OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopy
15 Minutes
Ulnocarpal impaction and arthroscopic wafer
Sanjeev Kakar, MD, FAOA ● Royalty: Arthrex ● Consulting Fees: Arthrex ● Ownership Interests: Sonex
75TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSH OCTOBER 1 - 3, 2020
Ulnar Impaction Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure
Surgical Tips and Tricks In a Case Based Approach
Sanj Kakar MD, FAOA Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN USA Three Key Questions To Ask Yourself When Managing Ulnar Wrist Pain? Categorization Of Ulnar Wrist Pain
• Pain
• Pain with instability
• Pain with arthritis Distal Radioulnar Joint Pathology A Difficult Problem To Treat !!!! . LOW BACK PAIN OF THE WRIST . Multifactorial pathology • Bony Deformity • Cartilage injury • TFCC disorders • Soft tissue injury e.g. ECU instability
. These are NOT mutually exclusive • Failure to recognize this → suboptimal results
Four Important Questions To Ask
Bone deformity
Unstable Cartilage Bone deformity ? YES / NO ECU defect Cartilage damage ? YES / NO TFCC injury ? YES / NO
TFCC Unstable ECU tendon ? YES / NO injury
.Arthroscopic assessment • Hook test Ruch et al. • Trampoline test Hermansdorfer & Kleinman • DRUJ arthroscopy Nakamura
– But what if it’s scarred down peripherally?
Hook Test
Myriad of Causes of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome . Idiopathic . Malunited distal radius fracture . Post-shortening of radius . Madelung’s deformity . Epiphyseal arrest . Radial head excision . Essex-Lopresti injury . Non-traumatic Natural History of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome
. Chondromalacia •Lunate •Ulnar head . TFCC degeneration . LT disruption . DRUJ arthritis •20-38% incidence at 2 years
• Ulnar wrist pain with extension & UD****
– True PA xrays (elbow & shoulder at 900)
– MRI, arthroscopy
ΔΔ Kienbock’s Dx Diffuse lunate oedema Stylocarpal impaction Pain with wrist extension and supination
. Nonsurgical . Wafer resection • Splint • Arthroscopic • NSAIDS • Activity modification • Open • Steroid injections . Ulnar shortening . Surgical osteotomy • TFCC debridement • Metaphyseal • Lunate microfracture • Diaphyseal
. 36 articles re: arthroscopic wafer, open wafer or USO . Satisfaction rates • 100% - arthroscopic wafer • 89% - open wafer • 84% - USO . Excellent/good outcome • 82% - arthroscopic wafer • 87% - open wafer • 75% - USO . Complications • 21% - arthroscopic wafer • 8.8% - open wafer • 30% - USO e.g. symptomatic hardware, nonunion, DRUJ DJD . Could not establish clinical superiority Situations where ulnar shortening is favored over wafer
. Marked ulnar positive variance (>4mm resection needed) . Stylocarpal impaction . Dorsal ulna subluxation . Possibly LT injury . DRUJ Instability . Non smokers . Tolat 1 & 2 Wafer Procedure
Arthroscopic Wafer . Less invasive than open . Needs a central TFCC defect • or create a central TFCC defect will need to be created . Can do via DRUJ arthroscopy • Limited to < 3-4 mm shortening • Smokers
. Risk: inadequate resection, destabilization of DRUJ, pain Summary: Arthroscopic Wafer . Can do via radiocarpal or DRUJ arthroscopy
. Ensure resection through full pronosupination • Limited to < 3-4 mm shortening • Smokers
. Address all pathologies (four leaf clover)
. Takes time for patient to recover***
Sanj Kakar 2020
Thank You For The Privilege Of Your Time
Email: [email protected]
OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopy
15 Minutes
TFCC: Diagnosis (exam, imaging) and Classification
Toshiyasu Nakamura, MD, PhD No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose
75TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSH OCTOBER 1 - 3, 2020
2020/8/1
OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: Role of Arthroscopy DISCLOSURES 2020 ASSH TFCC: Diagnosis (exam, imaging) and Classification DISCLOSURES Toshiyasu Nakamura, MD, PhD Toshiyasu Nakamura, MD, PhD Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan Speaker has no relevant financial relationships with commercial interest to disclose.
Histological findings Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex - TFCC - Palmer AK., JHS 1981 T MH: meniscus homologue AD: articular disc L UCL: ulnar collateral lig. RUL: radioulnar lig. TFC • stabilizer of the ulnocarpal joint RUL • stabilizer of the distal radioulnar joint U R • load distributor • smooth wrist and forearm motion Nakamura T, Annals Anat 2000, JHS 26B, 2001
Tenderness point, ulnocarpal stress test Diagnosis of TFCC tear
Stress maneuver: ulnocarpal stress test ballottement test Image diagnosis: Arthrography MRI Arthroscopy
1 2020/8/1
Ballottement test Multiple directional DRUJ instability with complete fovea avulsion
Radiographs useful to diagnose ulnocarpal abutment syndrome Radiographs DRUJ dislocation
Arthrogram sequential images can be obtained Arthrogram
• Invasive • Use radiographic dye
Initial neutral ulnar deviation radial deviation
2 2020/8/1
AG TFCC ulnar tear (Palmer 1B) Arthrography
complete fovea avulsion
MRI MRI serial sections
Non invasive Screening coronal, sagittal, axial views
TFCC fovea avulsion: easy to diagnose (arrow)
dorsal volar
Ulnocarpal abutment syndrome Staticodynamic MRI
neutral
supination pronation
3 2020/8/1
Comparison of MRI and arthrogram AG and MRI 1B tear MRI + − AG + − AS AS + 42 65 + 93 14 − 2 31 − 10 23 Sensitivity : 39% Sensitivity : 86% Specificity : 93% Specificity : 69% Accuracy : 52% Accuracy : 82% • Fovea avulsion MRI AG AS + − AS + − + 26 6 + 18 14 − 58 50 − 26 82
Sensitivity : 81% Sensitivity : 56% Specificity : 46% Specificity : 75% Accuracy : 54% Accuracy : 71%
CT arthrogram Precise diagnosis with multiple slice Arthroscopy is gold standard for diagnosis of TFCC lesions after arthrogram STT
MCR MCU MCJ RCJ 6U 1-2 2-3 6R
3-4 DRUJd 4-5 DRUJp
TFCC: radiocarpal view 3-4 portal DRUJ arthroscopy
lunate
TFCC TFCC
radius sigmoid fovea notch ulnar head
4 2020/8/1
DRUJ arthroscopy DRUJ arthroscopy: direct vision to the ulnar lesion
DRUJ AS probing Severe DRUJ instability: right wrist
Palmer classification of traumatic tear Atzei classification of ulnar TFCC tears
Palmer AK, JHS-A 1989 Atzei A, Luchetti R. JHS-E 2008
New Classification Materials and Methods Traumatic-degenerative/ RCJ
• July 2014 to Sept 2015 (1 y 3m), Single surgeon Class 0 intact • 213 wrists of 211 patients, who underwent treatment of TFCC injuries, were Class 1 intra-disc a. slit, b. flap, c. double studied transverse slit, d. coronal, • Second look surgeries or secondary surgeries were excluded e. oblique, d. bucket handle • All cases had the RCJ and DRUJ arthroscopic findings Class 2 radial border a. disc, b. rim, c. complete Class 3 peripheral a. ulnar (classic Palmer 1B) • Male 123, Female 88 b. dorsal • Right 116, Left 93, Bilateral 2 c. palmar • Average age at the surgery 39.1 years (range 13-72) d. distal • Diagnosis of TFCC injury was based on MRI, arthrogram and arthroscopy e: horizontal Class 4 degenerative a. wear, b. perforation, c. massive Nakamura T. JWS in submitting Nakamura et al. JWS in submitting
5 2020/8/1
New Classification Surgical treatments of TFCC lesion based on classification
Traumatic-degenerative/ DRUJ RCJ Class 1 AS partial resection According to DRUJ arthroscopic findings: Class 2 AS partial resection or repair Class 3 AS capsular repair Stage 0 intact Class 4 ulnar shortening Stage 1 slit tear on the RUL surface Stage 2 partial RUL tear (dorsal or palmar) DRUJ Stage 1 AS debridement Stage 3 complete RUL tear Stage 2 AS transosseous repair or open repair Stage 4 relaxed RUL Stage 3 AS transosseous repair or open repair Stage 5 degenerative findings in the DRUJ TFCC reconstruction a. wear on proximal TFC surface, b. cartilage damage Stage 4 ulnar shortening Stage 5 ulnar shortening, Sauvé-Kapandji • Covers all TFCC injuries Nakamura et al. JWS in submitting Nakamura et al. JWS in submitting
DRUJ Stage 2 or 3: trans-osseous arthroscopic repair Reconstruction of the TFCC ECU half-slip
TFCC
Foveal detach Interference screw
TFCC tear with DRUJ instability Nakamura et al., JWS 2015, HaMiPla 2016, J Hand Surg E 2017
In summary: TFCC diagnosis and classification Thank you for your attention!
• DRUJ Ballottement test is the most useful test to diagnose TFCC lesions
• Arthrogram and MRI is excellent image modality to diagnose TFCC lesions
• Arthroscopy is gold standard for precise diagnosis of TFCC lesions
• Classification system should be based on RCJ and DRUJ arthroscopic findings
• Original classification system based on RCJ and DRUJ findings worked well for diagnosis of TFCC lesions as well as for determination of surgical treatment options
6 OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopy
15 Minutes
TFCC injury without instability
Charles A. Goldfarb, MD ● Non-CME Services: Acumed
75TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSH OCTOBER 1 - 3, 2020
7/30/20
37 yo male
TFCC Injury without Instability • Fall on outstretched dominant right hand, supinated • Persistent ulnar sided pain for 2.5 months • Has failed NASAIDs, off the shelf brace, & activity modification
Charles A. Goldfarb, MD Professor and Executive Vice Chair Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital 1 2
Key Examination Points TFCC Additional information
• Localize pain • MRI • Test DRUJ stability in sup, pron, neutral • 80+% sensitive for central tears • Peripheral tear sensitivity less but increased w/ arthrogram • Provocative tests for TFCC • Negative MRI does not rule out tear • Rule out ECU • Corticosteroid injection- diagnostic/ therapeutic • Rule out LT ligament • Ultrasound
Hand Clinics 2010
Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital 3 4
1 7/30/20
Next step
• 37 yo male with 2.5 months of ulnar sided wrist pain w/o instability • Has failed conservative treatment including steroid injection • 72 patients • Continued nonoperative care vs wrist arthroscopy • Based on PRWE <20, complete recovery in • 32 of 72 (44%) at 34 weeks • 45 of 72 (63%) had at least a 14- point improvement
Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital 5 6
Wrist Arthroscopy Palmer Classification, JHS 1989
• Acute Tears • A- Central • B- Ulnar (+ dorsal- ulnar) • C- Volar (UC ligaments) • D- Radial
Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital 7 8
2 7/30/20
TFCC Lunate Scaphoid Facet Facet
Primus Manus: A Pocketbook Manual of Hand and Upper Extremity Anatomy Primus Manus: A Pocketbook Manual of Hand and Upper Extremity Anatomy
9 10
Kleinman, JHS 2007
Primus Manus: A Pocketbook Manual of Hand and Upper Extremity Anatomy
11 12
3 7/30/20
Palmar 1A Palmar 1A
• Central tears- poor blood supply (Bednar, 1991 JHS) • Debridement to stable base • Maintain dorsal and volar ligaments
Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital 13 14
Palmar 1B Palmar 1B
• Peripheral tears, straight ulnar or dorsal/ ulnar 1. Outside in repair to ECU subsheath (Whipple and Geissler, • Critical to understand DRUJ stability Ortho 1993) • Debridement with or without repair 2. Inside out repairs to capsule (De Araujo, Arthroscopy, 1996) 3. All arthroscopic anchor repairs • Yao, 2011 • Geissler, 2015
Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital 15 16
4 7/30/20
Palmar 1B Palmar 1B
Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital 17 18
Palmar 1B Outside In Repair
Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital 19 20
5 7/30/20
Partial
Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital 21 22
Palmar 1C Palmar 1D
• Attachment of ulnocarpal ligament • May be isolated or associated with fracture • Ligament avulsion • Poor vascularity • Split tear b/w UT and UL ligaments 1. Debridement (Trumble Hand Clinics, 2011) • May be associated with LT instability 2. Repair 1. Debridement 1. Arthroscopically assisted 2. Heat Shrinkage 2. All arthroscopic 3. Open repair, outside- in Ho, Lee, Sin Hand Surgery, 2012
Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital 23 24
6 7/30/20
Outcomes
65% good or excellent
Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital 25 26
Peripheral TFCC Tear in Adolescent
Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital 27 28
7 7/30/20
Thank you Pearls
1. Careful clinical examination 2. Understand arthroscopic anatomy 3. Multiple surgical techniques yield satisfactory results 4. Adolescent population
Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital Washington University Orthopedics | Barnes Jewish Hospital 29 30
Charles A. Goldfarb, MD
Blog: congenitalhand.wustl.edu Twitter: @congenitalhand Podcast: The Upper Hand: Chuck & Chris Talk Hand Surgery
Washington University Orthopedics | St. Louis Children’s Hospital | Shriner’s Hospital for Children-St. Louis 31
8 OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopy
15 Minutes
TFCC injury with instability
Keiji Fujio, MD No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose
75TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSH OCTOBER 1 - 3, 2020
Speaker has not provided a handout for
this presentation OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopy
12 Minutes
Midcarpal Instability
David Hargreaves, MBBS No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose
75TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSH OCTOBER 1 - 3, 2020
8/3/2020
DISCLOSURES
David Hargreaves, MBBS
Speaker has no relevant financial relationships with commercial interest to disclose.
1
The Role of Arthroscopy : Midcarpal Instability
David G Hargreaves Southampton , UK.
2
What is Midcarpal Instability?
• Misnomer: Not “Instability of the Midcarpal joint”
• Instability of the Proximal row: R-C & MC
• Lack of Proprioceptive control in a lax wrist
3
1 8/3/2020
“Catch Up” Clunk
From Radial to Ulnar deviation :
Sudden transition of proximal row from flexed position to neutral
4
Ulnar Sag
5
Pathophysiology
• Role of Forearm rotation :
• Instability in Pronation • Stable in Supination
6
2 8/3/2020
Spectrum of Palmar M/C Instability
Grade 0 Pre-symptomatic No symptoms. Voluntary clunking only Grade 1 Dynamic Giving way . No passive sag / voluntary clunk
Grade 2 Voluntary dynamic Symptomatic giving way Voluntary clunking
Grade 3 Static reducible VISI at rest. Passively reduced
Grade 4 Static Irreducible Fixed VISI. Not reducible
Hargreaves. J Hand Surg(Eu) Jan 2016.
7
Role of Arthroscopy
• Diagnostic: Exclude other Pathology (L-T rupture)
• Treatment: Thermal Capsular Shrinkage Partial wrist fusion
8
Grade 1 and 2 : Arthroscopic Capsular Shrinkage
Palmar Dorsal
Post Op: Immobilisation 6w
9
3 8/3/2020
Tips and Tricks
• Avoid extensive burning
• temperature : • Spotting • Water flow • Temp regulated probes
10
Long Term results: FU 10-14yrs: Instability Symptoms
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Pre op 2yrs 10yrs
none Occasional Frequent
11
>10Yr FU : DASH
40
30
20
10
0 Pre op 2yr 10 yr
12
4 8/3/2020
Objective stability
• Anterior drawer test : Stable : 12/14 wrists
13
Movement
• > 95% Arc
14
Treatment Options 0 Pre- No symptoms. No treatment symptomatic Voluntary clunking only
1 Dynamic Giving way . Soft tissue stabilization No passive sag / voluntary or clunk arthroscopic capsular shrinkage
2 Voluntary Symptomatic giving way Soft tissue stabilization dynamic and voluntary clunking or arthroscopic capsular shrinkage 3 Static VISI at rest. Easily reduced Soft tissue stabilization reducible or Bone procedure (R-L Fusion) 4 Static Fixed VISI. Not reducible Bone procedure (R-L Fusion) Irreducible
15
5 8/3/2020
Grade 3 and 4: Arthroscopic Radio-Lunate Fusion
16
Conclusion
• Long term results : improvement maintained 80% : Immobilization 6w.
• Avoidance of Complications : Meticulous care !
• Dynamic instability: Arthroscopic Capsular Shrinkage
• Static Deformity: Radio-lunate fusion
17
6 OnDemand Precourse 09: Fundamental to Cutting Edge: The Role of Arthroscopy
15 Minutes
CMC fracture- dislocation, Small Joint Arthroscopy
Steven S. Shin, MD ● Royalty: Arthrex Hely & Weber ● Consulting Fees: Arthrex ● Speakers Bureau: Arthrex
75TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSH OCTOBER 1 - 3, 2020
If it can fit a scope, we should scope it…right?
CMC Fracture-Dislocations and • Radiocarpal, midcarpal Small Joint Arthroscopy • CMC, MCP, PIP, DIP, DRUJ
• ~ 2 mm (larger with sheath or cannula)
Steven S. Shin, MD, MMSc
Associate Professor and Executive Vice Chair
Department of Orthopaedics, Cedars-Sinai Health System
cedars-sinai.org
2 1 2
Thumb CMC Arthroscopy Thumb CMC Arthroscopy for Bennett Fractures
• General or regional anesthesia (local?)
• Finger traps on thumb/index finger, traction tower (5-10 lbs) J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Jan;35(1):137-40. • Portals: 1-R, 1-U, dorsal, trans-thenar • Benefits • Instruments ~ 2 mm • Can directly view and assess articular reduction • Ensure wires or screws are not intra-articular • Things you can do • Synovectomy, chondroplasty, thermal • Understand deforming forces shrinkage, loose body removal, • APL: dorsal, radial, proximal; supination microfracture, bony resection • Adductor pollicis
3 4 3 4
Case: Bennett Fracture Thumb CMC Arthroscopy: Insufflation and Scope Insertion
30 yo RHD MMA fighter
Injured right thumb during UFC match 5 days prior
5 6 5 6
1 Case: Arthroscopic Visualization and Diagnosis Arthroscopic Debridement
7 8 7 8
Using Arthroscopy and Fluoroscopy at the same time I’m not that good: Fluoroscopy-only Reduction and Fixation
Culp R and Johnson J. Arthroscopically Assisted Percutaneous Fixation of Bennett Fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Jan;35(1):137-40. 10 9 9 10
Maybe better without the scope! Post Op
Pins/cast for 4 weeks
Return to impact/grappling: 3 months
4 weeks post op
11 12 11 12
2 5th CMC Joint Arthroscopy (courtesy of David Slutsky, MD) 5th CMC Fracture-Dislocation (courtesy of David Slutsky, MD)
• Finger traps on RF/SF
• Portals (Slutsky, Hand Clin 2011): • Ulnar or 5-MH (between EDM and 5th MC ulnar base-hamate ligament) • Radial or 4-MH (between 4th MC ulnar base-hamate ligament and extensor tendon)
• Structure at risk: DUSN
Slutsky D. July 21, 2011. Retrieved from https://www.vumedi.com/video/5th-cmc-joint-arthroscopy-for-a-fracturedislocation/ 13 Slutsky D. July 21, 2011. Retrieved from https://www.vumedi.com/video/5th-cmc-joint-arthroscopy-for-a-fracturedislocation/ 14 13 14
Arthroscopic Visualization Arthroscopic Reduction
Volar articular fragment attached to 4th MC base Displaced fracture of 5th MC base through intact intermetacarpal ligament
From Slutsky D. Arthroscopic Reduction and Percutaneous Fixation of Fifth Carpometacarpal Fracture-Dislocations. From Slutsky D. Arthroscopic Reduction and Percutaneous Fixation of Fifth Carpometacarpal Fracture-Dislocations. Hand Clin 27 (2011) 361–367 15 Hand Clin 27 (2011) 361–367 16 15 16
K-wire Fixation MCP Joint Arthroscopy
• First reported thumb MCP scope (Andrews 1985, AJSM)
• Indications similar to other small joints • Thumb: reduction of Stener lesions, artho- assisted repair of UCL tears, thermal shrinkage of volar plate for instability (PC Ho 2019, JHS Asia Pacific)
• Long-term results: unknown
From Slutsky D. Arthroscopic Reduction and Percutaneous Fixation of Fifth Carpometacarpal Fracture-Dislocations. From Badia A. Arthroscopy of the trapezoimetacapral and metacarpophalangeal joints. J Hand Surg Am. 17 18 Hand Clin 27 (2011) 361–367 May-Jun 2007;32(5):707-24 17 18
3 MCP Joint Arthroscopy RCL Avulsion Fracture at 5th MCP Joint
• Radial and ulnar MCP portals
From Cobb TK, Berner SH, Badia A. New frontiers in hand arthroscopy. Hand Clin. 2011 Aug;27(3):383-94. 19 Cobb TK, Berner SH, Badia A. New frontiers in hand arthroscopy. Hand Clin. 2011 Aug;27(3):383-94. 20 19 20
PIP Joint Arthroscopy DIP Joint Arthroscopy: WOW
PIP joint: portals between lateral bands and collateral ligaments
DIP joint: high risk of scope damage, technically difficult
Cobb TK, Berner SH, Badia A.New frontiers in hand arthroscopy. Hand Clin. 2011 Aug;27(3):383-94. 21 Cobb TK, Berner SH, Badia A.New frontiers in hand arthroscopy. Hand Clin. 2011 Aug;27(3):383-94. 22 21 22
Keep pushing the envelope…THANK YOU
Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/winmintun566/arthroscopy-wmt and 23 https://vizdom44.wordpress.com/2020/02/22/shoulder-arthroscopy-the-basics/ 23
4