The Great Grimsby Seafood Village
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
NCA Profile 42 Lincolnshire Coast and Marshes
National Character 42. Lincolnshire Coast and Marshes Area profile: Supporting documents www.gov.uk/natural-england 1 National Character 42. Lincolnshire Coast and Marshes Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future. -
Future Potential for Offshore Wind in Wales Prepared for the Welsh Government
Future Potential for Offshore Wind in Wales Prepared for the Welsh Government December 2018 Acknowledgments The Carbon Trust wrote this report based on an impartial analysis of primary and secondary sources, including expert interviews. The Carbon Trust would like to thank everyone that has contributed their time and expertise during the preparation and completion of this report. Special thanks goes to: Black & Veatch Crown Estate Scotland Hartley Anderson Innogy Renewables MHI-Vestas Offshore Wind Milford Haven Port Authority National Grid Natural Resources Wales Ørsted Wind Power Port of Mostyn Prysmian PowerLink The Crown Estate Welsh Government Cover page image credits: Innogy Renewables (Gwynt-y-Môr Offshore Wind Farm). | 1 The Carbon Trust is an independent, expert partner that works with public and private section organizations around the world, helping them to accelerate the move to a sustainable, low carbon economy. We advise corporates and governments on carbon emissions reduction, improving resource efficiency, and technology innovation. We have world-leading experience in the development of low carbon energy markets, including offshore wind. The Carbon Trust has been at the forefront of the offshore wind industry globally for the past decade, working closely with governments, developers, suppliers, and innovators to reduce the cost of offshore wind energy through informing policy, supporting business decision-making, and commercialising innovative technology. Authors: Rhodri James Manager [email protected] -
Port Freight Statistics: 2015
Statistical Release 21 September 2016 UK Port Freight Statistics: 2015 About this release Overall total freight tonnage declined by 1 per cent in 2015. Whilst tonnage fell marginally, reflecting reduced The importance of shipping and trade to the economy of the UK, demand for coal and ores, changes in steel production, an island nation, has resulted and lower dependency on food imports, unitised traffic in the establishment of a large experienced a third consecutive year of growth. number of ports around the coast, which are very diverse in terms of Port Freight Traffic (tonnage) size and type of cargo handled. Total tonnage levels decreased slightly by 1 per cent compared to 2014, with 496.7 million tonnes being handled by UK ports in 2015. This statistical release provides information on trends and Unitised Traffic at Major Ports patterns in the handling of freight Unitised traffic handled at UK major ports in 2015 rose by 4 per traffic at UK sea ports. cent, with 23.6 million units coming in and going out of UK major ports. The number of main freight units handled by UK major ports In this publication rose to 13.4 million units. Port freight traffic p2 Cargo types Direction of freight traffic p3 The proportion of UK major port bulk freight fell to its lowest level since Comparison to other National the mid-90s, and unitised traffic now accounts for one-third of all UK Statistics p5 major port freight traffic. Major port freight traffic by cargo Chart 1: UK major ports cargo tonnage proportions, 1995 - 2015 type and direction p6 Busiest port freight traffic by 21% Other general cargo Lo-Lo & 34% cargo type p12 Ro-Ro 27% Trade routes p14 Trade with European Union (EU) 75% countries p19 Bulk 68% 61% Freight Number of arrivals p20 Strengths and weaknesses of the data p22 Glossary p22 1995 2005 2015 Users and uses of the data p22 There have been positive signs of growth in liquid bulk goods Background notes p23 and increased imports of Other dry bulk goods into UK ports. -
ABLE Marine Energy Park (AMEP) ABLE Humber Port, East Coast, UK Establishing a New Offshore Wind Cluster
ABLE Marine Energy Park (AMEP) ABLE Humber Port, East Coast, UK Establishing a New Offshore Wind Cluster Information on AMEP to Support the Attraction of Offshore Wind Activity - 2021 Contents 3. Introduction 4. ABLE Marine Energy Park Aerial View 5. Location - Connectivity to Europe 6. Location - Road & Rail 7. Location - Proximity to Market 8. AMEP - The Offer 9. AMEP - Freeport Status 10. AMEP - Optimum Site Solutions 11. AMEP - Indicative Working Plan 12. AMEP - Offshore Wind Work Flow 13. Hornsea One Offshore Wind Farm 14. Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm 15. Dogger Bank Offshore Wind Farm 16. Planning - Fully Consented 17. Cost Reduction Opportunities 18. Wind Installation Vessels - Benefits 19. AMEP - Technical Specification 21. AMEP - Operating Model 22. AMEP - Competitive Advantage 23. Heavy Lift & Transport Services 24. The Humber Estuary Characteristics 25. Humber - Tees & Tyne Comparisons 27. Workforce - Productivity 28. Workforce - Availability 29. Production & Assembly - Workforce 31. Financial Support for Investment Document Reference: CM.NFE-AMEP-OSW-29 January 2021 Introduction ABLE Marine Energy Park (AMEP). Able Marine Energy Park (AMEP) is a port development on the south bank of the Humber Estuary on the East Coast of the United Kingdom. It is a nationally significant infrastructure project (NSIP) and is recognised as a core development within the UK Government Infrastructure Roadmap. The AMEP project base case involves developing Phase 1 with 1,349m of installation quays, 4no. installation yards (78.63 ha), with an additional 139 ha for manufacturer storage. It represents a singular opportunity for the UK to establish a world-scale industrial cluster and enable the UK to maximise the economic development potential provided by the combination of the emerging market and supportive policies. -
Britain's Distant Water Fishing Industry, 1830-1914
BRITAIN'S DISTANT WATER FISHING INDUSTRY, 1830-1914 A STUDY IN TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE being a Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Hull by MICHAEL STUART HAINES APRIL 1998 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 LIST OF TABLES 5 INTRODUCTION 12 i THE THESIS 14 ii CONTEXT 15 iii SOURCES AND METHODOLOGY 19 PART ONE THE ECONOMIC CONTEXT OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE 28 CHAPTER 1 THE FISH TRADE 29 i FISH AND THE FISHERIES 29 ii DEVELOPMENT OF THE FISHING INDUSTRY TO 1830 37 iii LATENT DEMAND 44 CHAPTER 2 DISTRIBUTION 50 i INLAND TRANSPORT 50 ii PORT INFRASTRUCTURE 68 iii ACTUAL DEMAND 78 PART TWO TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE AND FISH PRODUCTION 84 CHAPTER 3 SAIL 85 i TRAWLING 85 ii SMACKS 96 iii ICE 118 iv STEAM AND SMACKS 127 CHAPTER 4 EARLY STEAMERS 134 i EXPERIMENTS AND TUGS 134 ii STEAM FISHING BOATS 143 CHAPTER 5 DEVELOPMENTS AFTER 1894 182 i THE OTTER-TRAWL 182 ii DEMERSAL FISHERIES 188 iii PELAGIC FISHERIES 198 iv MOTORS AND WIRELESSES 211 PART THREE RAMIFICATIONS OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE 217 CHAPTER 6 THE INDUSTRY 218 i BUSINESS ORGANIZATION 218 ii HUMAN RESOURCES 233 CHAPTER 7 EXTERNAL FORCES 259 i EUROPEAN FISHING INDUSTRIES 259 ii PERCEPTIONS OF THE FISHERIES 274 iii LEGACY 288 PART FOUR BIBLIOGRAPHY 294 PART FIVE APPENDIX 306 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the National Fishing Heritage Centre, Great Grimsby, for providing funds that enabled completion of this thesis. All the work was done from the University of Hull, and my gratitude is extended to the secretarial staff of the History Department and Kevin Watson for help with various practical matters, together with staff at the Brynmor Jones Library and Graduate Research Institute. -
Mast Special Collection
The Marine Technology Special Collection. List of Catalogued Materials. The Marine Technology Special Collection List of Catalogued Materials Revised 11 May 2012 Contents Part 1 & 2: Company records, plans, and photographs Materials catalogued to date Shipbuilding, marine engine building, shiprepairing, and marine equipment suppliers: ca.10% of 53,000 items are catalogued, cataloguing in progress. Shipbreaking: 40,000 items, list not yet available, cataloguing pending. Photographs for all topics: list not yet available, cataloguing pending. An example record <Name of organisation>. <town, country where organisation based>, <type of business>. <number of materials catalogued>, <dates of materials>, <Types of materials>. where:- <Name of organisation> may be approximate, sometimes because of name changes which are too numerous to list here. <dates of materials> is not the dates the organisation existed. A & P Appledore. Newcastle. Consultants. 10 items, 1970-1990, Facilities & Products. Publicity. How to search this list This list is arranged alphabetically by the name of the organisation. Search this PDF on your computer by using the Adobe “find” search function. Make your searches very simple, usually ONE WORD is best. Example searches o A & P Appledore & Co. Ltd. Search for appledore o William Denny & Co. Ltd. Search for denny o Y.A.R.D. Search for yard or Y.A.R.D. o Sunderland Shipbuilding Co. Search for sunderland shipbuild (using truncation shipbuild which will find shipbuilder, ..ers, ..ing. o A shipbuilder based in Sunderland search for sunderland or if necessary as a last resort shipbuild 1 The Marine Technology Special Collection. List of Catalogued Materials. Alphabetical list of names of organisations:- A & P Appledore. -
Humber Enterprise Zones
Humber Enterprise Zones Humber Enterprise Zone The UK’s Energy Estuary 1 thehumber.com Humber Enterprise Zones 4 hour drive gives from the Humber access to Welcome •Oslo •Edinburgh 40m 75% •Copenhagen people of UK manufacturing Humber Within 12 hours’ sailing - to the •London •Berlin 80% of UK windfarms Warsaw• 60% of European markets •Prague •Paris Humber Vienna• The sheer size of the Humber Enterprise In our location on the East Coast of the UK, we’re - The Humber has some of the UK’s largest - Development land at Humberside Contents Zone (EZ), being the largest in the UK, almost equidistant between London, Edinburgh, development sites adjacent to the deep Airport, the UK’s second busiest heliport, is exceeded only by the scale of the Dublin and Rotterdam, with the North European water ports at Able Marine Energy Park serving the offshore wind, oil and gas opportunity here. Trade Axis (NETA) and E20 Trans-European Network and at Paull and Q.E. Dock on the Port of industries. Humber Enterprise Zone 4-5 traversing westwards from mainland Europe. Hull estate. Investor Incentives 6-7 Known as the UK’s Energy Estuary, the Humber has Within a four hour drive of the Humber EZ you can powered the UK economy for decades, bringing Hull 8-9 access 40m people and 75 per cent of the UK’s everything from food to freight, coal to cars, - Sites adjacent to the ports of Grimsby East Riding of Yorkshire 10-11 manufacturing and within 24 hours travel 320m passengers to petroleum. In fact the Humber is still - Space for offshore wind Original and Immingham, the UK’s busiest port customers are accessible via mainland Europe. -
Dedicated Tug Provider
DATED ASSOCIATED BRITISH PORTS and [TUG PROVIDER] Agreement relating to the provision of towage services within the inner-docks of ABP’s port of Grimsby ASSOCIATED BRITISH PORTS 25 BEDFORD STREET LONDON WC2E 9ES AN AGREEMENT made the day of 2020 BETWEEN: (1) ASSOCIATED BRITISH PORTS whose principal office is at 25 Bedford Street, London WC2E 9ES (“ABP”); and (2) [TUG PROVIDER’S FULL COMPANY NAME] whose registered office is at [INSERT] [company number] (the "Tug Provider"), each referred to in this Agreement as a “Party” and together as the “Parties”. BACKGROUND (A) ABP is the owner and operator of the port of Grimsby (“Port”). (B) The Tug Provider is a towage operator and operates a fleet of tugs. (C) ABP wishes to facilitate an improved towage service at the Port, and in particular the Inner-Docks of the Port (as further defined below), for the benefit of ABP’s customers and other users of the Port. (D) ABP has determined that, in accordance with Article 6 of the Port Services Regulations 2019 (“PSR”), it wishes to appoint the Tug Provider to be the dedicated provider of towage services for ABP’s customers and other third parties operating within the Inner-Docks, in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions set out below. AGREED TERMS 1. DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION 1.1 In this Agreement, the following terms have the following meanings. “ABP Regulations” means all port rules, codes of practice or other directions or regulations issued from time to time by ABP in connection with the Port; “ABP Standard Terms & Conditions -
Agva NUTS2 2014
aGVA1 by NUTS 22 region, 2014 United Kingdom Haroldswick North Roe Stromness Kirkwall Sandness Hoy Walls Lyness St Margaret’s Lerwick Hope Scrabster John o’ Groats Port of Ness Durness Thurso Melvich Bettyhill Kinlochbervie Tongue Wick Càrlabhagh Scourie Stornoway Altnaharra Calanais Lybster Kinbrace Dunbeath Lochinver Inchnadamph Ledmore Helmsdale Oykel Lairg Tarbert Bridge Brora Golspie Ullapool Bonar Bridge UKC1: Tees Valley and Durham Dornoch Leverburgh UKC2: Northumberland and Tyne and Wear Poolewe Tain Gairloch UKD1: Cumbria Malacleit Lossiemouth Alness Lochmaddy Invergordon Burghead Cullen Rosehearty Buckie Ban Fraserburgh UKD3: Greater Manchester Uig Cromarty Kinlochewe Portsoy Carinish Dingwall Kinloss Elgin Nairn UKD4: Lancashire Achnasheen Fortrose Forres Aberchirder Shieldaig Rothes Keith Muir of Mintlaw UKD6: Cheshire Iochdar Ord Turri Peterhead Dunvegan Charlestown Maud Portree of Aberlour Lochcarron Inverness UKD7: Merseyside Belleheiglash Huntly Dutown UKE1: East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire Cannich Grantown Ellon Drynoch Kyle of Lochalsh Drumnadrochit -on-Spey Glenlivet Rhynie Oldmeldrum UKE2: North Yorkshire Dalabrog Lochboisdale Auchleven Broadford Carrbridge Tomintoul Inverurie Nethy Invermoriston Bridge UKE3: South Yorkshire Dyce UKM6 Aviemore Alford Kintore Aberdeen : West Yorkshire Fort Augustus Westhill UKE4 Ardvasar UKM5 Aboyne Invergarry Newtonmore Kingussie UKF1: Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire Kinloch Castlebay Mallaig Ballater Banchory : Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire Braemar UKF2 Stonehaven -
Policy Roundtable: Competition in Ports and Port Services 2011
Competition in Ports and Port Services 2011 The OECD Competition Committee debated competition in ports and port services in June 2011. This document includes an executive summary of that debate and the documents from the meeting: an analytical note by the OECD Secretariat and written submissions from Bulgaria, Chile, Estonia, Finland, the European Union, France, Germany, Indonesia, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, the Russian Federation, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Chinese Taipei, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States (Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission), as well as an aide-memoire of the discussion. Ports, whether maritime, inland or river ports, are important pieces of infrastructure that serve a wide range of customers including freight shippers, ferry operators and private boats. One of the main functions of ports is facilitating the domestic and international trade of goods, often on a large scale. Competition in maritime ports and port services is central to countries with significant volumes of maritime- based trade. Inland and river ports can also play important transport roles within countries in particular for heavy or bulky goods where alternative ways of transport are more costly. Ports are, therefore, important for the functioning of the world economy and effective competition in ports and port services plays an important role in the final prices of many products. The roundtable discussion focussed on market definition, regulatory reforms and antitrust enforcement in ports -
ABP ANNUAL REVIEW 2021 ABOUT ABP Together with Its Customers, ABP Handles Around £150 Billion of UK Trade Annually
ANNUAL REVIEW 2021 ABP ANNUAL REVIEW 2021 ABOUT ABP Together with its customers, ABP handles around £150 billion of UK trade annually 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 22 10 14 11 15 16 17 18 12 13 19 20 21 1. Troon 7. Goole 13. Ipswich 2. Ayr 8. Hull 14. Swansea 19. Plymouth 3. Silloth 9. Immingham 15. Port Talbot 20. Teignmouth 4. Barrow 10. Grimsby 16. Barry 21. Southampton 5. Fleetwood 11. King’s Lynn 17. Cardiff 22. Hams Hall Rail 6. Garston 12. Lowestoft 18. Newport Freight Terminal 2 ABP ANNUAL REVIEW 2021 ABOUT ABP ABP plays ABP is a vital role sustainably supporting connecting UK industry, the UK including: to global Alternative energy markets Offshore wind Associated British Ports (ABP) is the UK’s leading port group. With a network of 21 ports handling around one quarter Containers of the UK’s seaborne trade, our mission is “Keeping Britain Trading”. Energy generation ABP’s ports include Immingham, the UK’s largest port by tonnage, and Southampton, the nation’s and storage number one export port, handling £40 billion of UK exports each year. RoRo The group’s other activities include rail terminal operations (Hams Hall Rail Freight Terminal), port maintenance and dredging (UK Dredging) and Port-centric marine and hydrographic consultancy (ABPmer). manufacturing Our ports are at the heart of the UK economy; arteries for international trade, they connect the nations’ importers and exporters to global Vehicles markets. ABP is an essential partner for the Offshore Dry bulks Wind industry. Green Port Hull is home to the UK’s largest Offshore Wind blade manufacturer, where we have a joint £310 million investment Rail with SGRE. -
Appendix 5.6
Appendix 5.6 Winter Birds (Part 3 of 3) Weather: Between the first and second survey dates the area was affected by a period of unsettled weather with the passage of frontal systems bringing some periods of heavy rainfall interspersed between warmer sunny periods. The heaviest rain fell on the 6th with 6cm recorded in some areas and this left standing water in parts of the survey area which had been dry fro several weeks. On the survey date winds were light to moderate, force 3 – 4 from the south-west; showers and a band of heavier rain passed through the region from early morning clearing in the afternoon with temperatures reaching 16C, cooler than of late. There was total cloud cover throughout the survey. Waders and Wildfowl: Some of the fields in the survey area had been harvested and odd stubbles dragged but in general environmental conditions were very similar to the previous week. Changes in field conditions are highlighted in the spreadsheet. Many of the permanent pasture fields were still unsuitable for roosting and feeding waders due to the height and density of the grass. Nine Black-tailed Godwits were feeding with Curlew in field 110, permanent pasture that was being grazed by cattle but this was the only wader species recorded other than Curlew. Only 46 Curlew were found in the fields within the survey area with an additional 23 birds being seen in the extra fields, outside the survey area as shown on the map and described in week one. All of the Curlew within the survey area were feeding on permanent pasture fields or those mown for hay but the stubble field C again held birds just outside the boundary of the surveyed site.