DOCSLIB.ORG

The Mayor of London's Proposals for Devolution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Mayor of London's Proposals for Devolution June 2010 The Mayor of London’s Proposals for Devolution Foreword London is more than just our capital city; it is a global powerhouse. Its population is as large as Wales and Scotland combined, and it has an economy larger than Denmark and Portugal combined. The city is home to more people than many EU member states, and is one of the few genuine ‘world cities’. Despite this, London’s devolution settlement remains weak and there is much room for improvement, particularly in ensuring that we see decisions taken by the local communities that they will affect. A new government has come in to power pledging further devolution; so now is the time to act. Greater London Authority (GLA) remains highly dependent on national government. The current The office of the Mayor of London, in place London settlement falls well short of the city since 2000, has worked well. It has enabled government arrangements in place in other more public services to be devolved from world cities, such as New York and Tokyo. Whitehall and delivered closer to Londoners. Through democratic debate and a clear electoral This will no longer do. With a new coalition mandate, it has given the UK’s premier city the government strongly supportive of the leadership it needs in key policy areas such as principles of devolution, we should grasp the transport infrastructure, policing, affordable opportunity to develop further the London housing, opportunities for children and young settlement. I welcome the Conservative Party’s people, and environmental improvements. ‘New Settlement for London’ publication and I also applaud the coalition Goverment’s Ten years, two and a half Mayoral terms and two decision to dismantle the Government Office for incumbents later, the office of Mayor has proved London (GoL) immediately. Building on these itself to be a mature, democratically legitimate developments, I am proposing a new chapter in institution. As my election victory in 2008 the devolution of Whitehall functions to London. showed, the Mayoralty has proved itself to be directly accountable to Londoners. My key asks are that the London region of the Homes and Communities Agency (HCA) However, while the Mayoralty may have be devolved to the GLA, and that the GLA substantial informal powers, outside transport group should be reorganised so as to make it and policing, its formal powers are minimal. as streamlined and fit for purpose as possible, When the Mayoralty was created in 1999, the including folding in the functions of the London vision was bold but the devolution package Development Agency (LDA) into the GLA. Other was lacking in some crucial respects. The proposals include giving London a greater say in 4 the Royal Parks, suburban rail lines, policing, the and the declarations of interest and of gifts and Thames and the Olympic legacy. hospitality of my team. I would of course expect the same standards of openness to apply to the Of course, London government does not consist new elements of the reshaped GLA group. solely of the Mayoralty. Greater devolution from Whitehall to the Mayor of London should Statutory powers are not, of course, the be all be accompanied by greater devolution to the and end all for the Mayoralty. The officeholder London boroughs, in line with the principles will always rely on the profile and the influence of “double devolution.” I have already made that the role brings. But statute must enable progress in giving boroughs greater discretion rather than hinder the Mayor; free up rather in a number of areas including local transport than restrict. The reforms outlined below form plans, and I am sure that we could go further in part of a truly localist approach to public service other areas such as housing and skills. delivery in which real and meaningful discretion is exercised democratically at the appropriate Greater power for the Mayor should also be tier of government. matched by greater power for the London Assembly to hold the Mayor to account. Any functions transferred to the GLA should be subject to strong Assembly scrutiny, and consideration should be given to whether the Assembly should be made fully independent of the GLA, and whether it should have an Boris Johnson enhanced role in strategy development. Mayor of London 15 June 2010 Transparency will be another key principle in the next tranche of devolution. I have led the way in publishing GLA payments over £1,000 Summary of proposals 1. Housing and regeneration The HCA in 6. Port of London Authority (PLA) The London should be devolved to the GLA PLA should be devolved to the GLA group group, so that the Mayor has a full set of given the critical importance of the Thames powers to deliver his housing policies. to London’s prosperity and the need to integrate its role with the Mayor’s Transport 2. Olympic legacy The Olympic Park Legacy Strategy and London Plan. The Mayor Company should be reconstituted as a should appoint the PLA Board with Kent and Mayoral Development Corporation (MDC), Essex also given the right of representation. reporting directly to the Mayor, and democratically accountable to Londoners 7. Traffic control The Mayor should be given through the Mayor. greater flexibility over traffic control on Transport for London (TfL) roads so that he 3. Royal Parks Agency (RPA) Responsibility can develop more effective solutions to get for the Royal Parks should be devolved traffic in London flowing more smoothly. from Whitehall to the Mayor, to ensure clear democratic accountability to Londoners. Its 8. Policing The Metropolitan Police Authority’s funding should be transferred in full from (MPA) functions should be divided between the Department for Culture, Media and Sport the Mayor and the Assembly with the Mayor (DCMS) to the GLA. taking on executive functions and the Assembly taking on the scrutiny function. 4. Skills The Mayor, and the London Skills This would create a policing board for and Employment Board (LSEB) which he London under the Mayor’s control. The chairs, should get the power to approve the Home Secretary and the Mayor would jointly allocation of the adult skills budget in London. appoint the Metropolitan Police Service Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (MPS) Commissioner, who would in turn and Job Centre Plus (JCP) expenditure on appoint the senior team in the MPS. skills and employment in London should have regard to the LSEB strategy. 9. A reconstituted GLA group The GLA group should be reorganised to improve its 5. Rail franchises The Mayor and Secretary of efficiency and effectiveness. The London State for Transport should jointly award the rail region of the HCA, the RPA and the PLA franchises for those suburban rail lines which should be devolved to the GLA. The LDA’s are largely contained within the boundaries of functions should be folded into the GLA greater London, to ensure a more integrated with the LDA ceasing to exist; and the MPA’s transport system. The Mayor should have a functions should be revamped and divided formal role in monitoring the franchises. between the Mayor and the Assembly. 6 The Mayor of London’s Proposals for Devolution 10. Resilience Responsibility for resilience issues Other issues for discussion in London should be devolved from GoL, which is being abolished, to the Mayor, given 14. The London Assembly The greater powers his lead on city-wide operations. for the Mayor should be matched by greater powers for the London Assembly to hold 11. Statutory strategies The Mayor should him to account. Consideration should be be given a freer hand to produce the plans given to granting the Assembly an enhanced and strategies of his choice, rather than role in strategy development, and also to being required to produce a dozen statutory separating the London Assembly from the strategies, over half of which lack any real GLA so that it is seen as an independent implementation powers. The unnecessary scrutiny body. double consultation process should be replaced by a single consultation period. 15. Waste The government should look at options for strengthening the role of the 12. General power of competence In line London Waste and Recycling Board (LWaRB) with the government’s plans to introduce in delivering efficient and effective waste a general power of competence for local management for London. authorities, the Mayor should have greater freedom to deliver public services provided 16. Energy and Climate Change in the capital. Consideration should be given to mechanisms that can drive a more efficient, 13. Financial flexibility The detailed ring- co-ordinated approach to the delivery of fencing of central government grants within climate change and alternative energy areas such as policing detracts from the programmes in London. principles of devolution, and hinders the Mayor’s ability to allocate resources according 17. Health Building on his existing role, the to his priorities. It should be discontinued. Mayor should have a role in allocating financial resources for public health in London (excluding clinical services). Background London government comprises a directly proposals should they not fit with the Mayor’s elected Mayor and a 25-strong directly elected planning policies as set out in the statutory London Assembly. London Plan, and in some cases take over planning applications from the boroughs and The Mayor’s role is to provide leadership for grant approval. London and co-ordinate public service delivery • Community safety – the Mayor appoints the in certain key areas of physical and social chairs of the MPA and LFEPA, and sets both infrastructure. The Assembly’s role is to act as bodies’ budgets. the scrutiny body for the GLA group, and to hold the Mayoralty accountable for its performance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Point of Entry
    DESIGNATED POINTS OF ENTRY FOR PLANT HEALTH CONTROLLED PLANTS/ PLANT PRODUCTS AND FORESTRY MATERIAL POINT OF ENTRY CODE PORT/ ADDRESS DESIGNATED POINT OF ENTRY AIRPORT FOR: ENGLAND Avonmouth AVO P The Bristol Port Co, St Andrew’s House, Plants/plant products & forestry St Andrew’s Road, Avonmouth , Bristol material BS11 9DQ Baltic Wharf LON P Baltic Distribution, Baltic Wharf, Wallasea, Forestry material Rochford, Essex, SS4 2HA Barrow Haven IMM P Barrow Haven Shipping Services, Old Ferry Forestry material Wharf, Barrow Haven, Barrow on Humber, North Lincolnshire, DN19 7ET Birmingham BHX AP Birmingham International Airport, Birmingham, Plants/plant products B26 3QJ Blyth BLY P Blyth Harbour Commission, Port of Blyth, South Plants/plant products & forestry Harbour, Blyth, Northumberland, NE24 3PB material Boston BOS P The Dock, Boston, Lincs, PE21 6BN Forestry material Bristol BRS AP Bristol Airport, Bristol, BS48 3DY Plants/plant products & forestry material Bromborough LIV P Bromborough Stevedoring & Forwarding Ltd., Forestry material Bromborough Dock, Dock Road South, Bromborough, Wirral, CH62 4SF Chatham (Medway) MED P Convoys Wharf, No 8 Berth, Chatham Docks, Forestry Material Gillingham, Kent, ME4 4SR Coventry Parcels Depot CVT P Coventry Overseas Mail Depot, Siskin Parkway Plants/plant products & forestry West, Coventry, CV3 4HX material Doncaster/Sheffield Robin DSA AP Robin Hood Airport Doncaster, Sheffield, Plants/plant products & forestry Hood Airport Heyford House, First Avenue, material Doncaster, DN9 3RH Dover Cargo Terminal,
    [Show full text]
  • London's River of Plastic: High Levels of Microplastics in the Thames Water
    1 London’s river of plastic: high levels of microplastics in the 2 Thames water column 3 K.H. Rowley 1,3, *, A-C. Cucknell 2, B.D. Smith 3, P.F. Clark 3, D. Morritt 1 4 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, 5 England 6 2 Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, England 7 3 Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, 8 England A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: This opportunistic study focussed on the quantification of microplastics in the River Thames water column, the catchment responsible for draining Greater London. Two sites on the tidal Thames were sampled; one upstream of the City of London at Putney, and the other downstream at Key words: Greenwich. Water column samples were collected from Plastic pollution June through to October 2017, being taken on the ebb and Thames Tideway flood tides, at the surface and a depth of 2 m. Surface Water Microplastics (excluding microfibres) were identified to Combined Sewer Overflows test whether the load varied between the two sites in relation to tide, depth and season. Secondary microplastics, films and fragments, contributed 93.5% of all 1 those found at Putney and Greenwich. Site, tide, depth and month affected density, with the combined interaction of month and site found to have the greatest influence on microplastics. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy analysis showed that polyethylene and polypropylene were the most common polymers collected from the River, suggesting broken down packaging was the primary source of microplastics in these samples.
    [Show full text]
  • GO EAST: UNLOCKING the POTENTIAL of the THAMES ESTUARY Andrew Adonis, Ben Rogers and Sam Sims
    GO EAST: UNLOCKING THE POTENTIAL OF THE THAMES ESTUARY Andrew Adonis, Ben Rogers and Sam Sims Published by Centre for London, February 2014 Open Access. Some rights reserved. Centre for London is a politically independent, As the publisher of this work, Centre for London wants to encourage the not-for-profit think tank focused on the big challenges circulation of our work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. facing London. It aims to help London build on its We therefore have an open access policy which enables anyone to access our content online without charge. Anyone can download, save, perform long history as a centre of economic, social, and or distribute this work in any format, including translation, without written intellectual innovation and exchange, and create a permission. This is subject to the terms of the Centre for London licence. fairer, more inclusive and sustainable city. Its interests Its main conditions are: range across economic, environmental, governmental and social issues. · Centre for London and the author(s) are credited Through its research and events, the Centre acts · This summary and the address www.centreforlondon.co.uk are displayed · The text is not altered and is used in full as a critical friend to London’s leaders and policymakers, · The work is not resold promotes a wider understanding of the challenges · A copy of the work or link to its use online is sent to Centre for London. facing London, and develops long-term, rigorous and You are welcome to ask for permission to use this work for purposes other radical solutions for the capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report & Accounts 2020
    OVERVIEW ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS 2020 CUSTODIANS OF THE TIDAL THAMES PROTECT / IMPROVE / PROMOTE PORT OF LONDON AUTHORITY ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS 2020 D ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS & ACCOUNTS 2020 Pages 2-5 Pages 26-43 Pages 52-85 Overview Performance Financial statements About the tidal Thames 2 River use 2020 28 Consolidated income statement 53 2020 at a glance 2 Port trade 28 Consolidated statement of other About the PLA 4 Inland waterways freight 28 comprehensive income 53 2020 Highlights 5 Sport & recreation 29 Consolidated and company Passenger travel 29 balance sheet 54 River navigation and safety 30 Consolidated and company statements of changes in equity 55 Environmental stewardship 32 Consolidated and company Planning consultation and statements of cash flows 56 technical expertise 34 Notes to the consolidated and Bringing people together company financial statements 57 and promoting the river 35 Statement of Members’ responsibilities 84 PLA in the community 36 Independent auditor’s report 85 PLA people 37 PLA activity indicators 38 Port trade statistics 40 Review of principal risks 42 Pages 6-25 Strategic report Chairman’s statement 7 Chief Executive’s statement 8 Chief Harbour Master’s statement 12 Chief Financial Officer’s statement 14 Opportunities & challenges 16 PLA strategy 18 Photo credits Income 19 Krispen Atkinson Stakeholder benefits 20 Pages 44-51 Andrew Christy Engaging with stakeholders 22 Corbyn Governance DHL Ben Fitzpatrick Mark Stanford Corporate governance report 45 Graham Tassell Board members 46 Thames Clippers PLA Board – summary statistics 49 Thames Festival Trust Committees 50 Tideway Find out more www.pla.co.uk Tom Ochman PORT OF LONDON AUTHORITY ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS 2020 1 OVERVIEW OVERVIEW OVERVIEW ABOUT THE TIDAL THAMES The tidal Thames is 95 miles of river from Teddington Lock, through central London, out to the North Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • London's Forgotten Highway
    Transport Committee London’s forgotten highway October 2006 Transport Committee London’s forgotten highway October 2006 copyright Greater London Authority October 2006 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 10: 1 85261 920 1 ISBN 13: 978 1 85261 920 6 This publication is printed on recycled paper The Transport Committee Geoff Pope - Chairman (Liberal Democrat) Roger Evans - Deputy Chair (Conservative) John Biggs - Labour Angie Bray - Conservative Elizabeth Howlett - Conservative Peter Hulme Cross - One London Darren Johnson - Green Murad Qureshi - Labour Graham Tope - Liberal Democrat The Transport Committee’s general terms of reference are to examine and report on transport matters of importance to Greater London and the transport strategies, policies and actions of the Mayor, Transport for London, and the other Functional Bodies where appropriate. In particular, the Transport Committee is also required to examine and report to the Assembly from time to time on the Mayor’s Transport Strategy, in particular its implementation and revision. The terms of reference for this scrutiny were agreed by the Transport Committee on 8 June 2006: x To examine current levels of passenger river services on the Thames, including frequency, destinations, costs and integration with other transport modes x To examine the potential for improving and expanding the provision of river services through TfL, local authorities, developers and other private investors x To examine the potential use of expanded river services during the Olympics The Committee would welcome any feedback on this report.
    [Show full text]
  • TIDEWAY HANDBOOK Upstream.Doc August 2006 JB
    LO NDO N T I D E W AY H A N D B O O K 1 UPSTREAM EDITION MAINLY FOR NARROWBOATS & CRUISERS TRAVELLING • LIMEHOUSE TO BRENTFORD • LIMEHOUSE TO TEDDINGTON 2A DEF LONDON TIDEWAY HANDBOOK UPSTREAM CONTENTS TELEPHONE NUMBERS and VHF CHANNELS …… inside front cover SIGNS DISPLAYED at BRIDGES …….……………… inside front cover SOUND SIGNALS ……………………………………… inside front cover substitute cover page GENERAL INFORMATION ……………….…………… 1.2 CHECK LIST ……………………………………………. 1.6 EMERGENCIES ………………………………………… 1.8 RIVER MAP: Limehouse to Teddington ……………… 1.10 BRIDGE DIAGRAMS and PASSAGE NOTES ……… 1.12 FURTHER READING ………………………………….. 1.23 PASSAGE PLANNING SHEET ……….….…………… inside back cover ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ……………………………… back cover This book should be used in conjunction with the current edition of the British Waterways London Tidal Locks Availability leaflet, which gives the opening times of Limehouse Lock and Thames Locks (Brentford) together with the times of High Water London Bridge for the current year. The leaflet is available from the keepers at Teddington, Brentford or Limehouse, or from the British Waterways London office at Paddington (see back page) or on waterscape.com LONDON TIDEWAY HANDBOOK Upstream.doc August 2006 JB (Vessel Traffic Service) (Vessel Traffic VTS London TELEPHONE NUMBERSandVHFCHANNELS whitelight A very-quick-flashing * equal periods ofONandOFF isophase* Awhitelight: flashing By dayornight: 1whitelight By night: Abundleofstraw By day: triangle upside-down inan arranged 3redlights By night: triangle upside-down inan arranged 3reddiscs By
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail Learning Legacy
    PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT Water Resources Strategy Document Number: CR-PN-PRW-EN-SY-00002 Document History: Learning Legacy Version: Date: Drafted by: Authorised by: Reason for Revision: 1.0 12-01-2009 For issue Revised further to 2.0 12-02-2009 Environment Agency review This document contains proprietary information. No part of this document may be reproduced without prior written consent from the executive chairman of Cross London Rail Links Ltd. Water Resources Strategy Contents 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................4 1.1 Project Description .................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Legislative Background............................................................................................. 5 1.3 Purpose and Objectives ............................................................................................ 5 2 Environmental Management and Regulatory Regime and Links to Consenting Process...........................................................................................................................7 2.1 Regulatory Regime .................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Crossrail Environmental Requirements................................................................... 9 2.3 Environmental Management System ..................................................................... 11 3 Crossrail Key stakeholders
    [Show full text]
  • Port of London Authority
    CASE STUDY Port of London Authority The Client Our Solution Client: Port of London Authority The Port of London Authority (PLA) is a public The PLA contacted McGrath having heard trust established in 1908 to govern the Port of about the new state-of-the-art wharves that Contract: London. It is responsible for administering safe we had redeveloped in 2008. Waste management & recycling navigation and conservation of the River Duration: Thames from Teddington Lock in the west to Over the course of 15 months the Driftwood 2 years vessels discharged nearly 300 tonnes of mixed the Outer Thames Estuary in the east - a total Start Date: of 95 miles. wastes consisting mostly of tyres, scrap metal, 2008-10 timber, and plastic items that were removed The challenge from their vessels using our grab plant at the Value: As part of its conservation duties the PLA is Barking Wharf. £30,000 tasked with cleaning the river of discarded litter and waste materials which is carried out The materials were segregated in our on-site using two bespoke 15metre vessels the Materials Recycling Facility and in the case of Driftwood II and Driftwood III - whose main rubber and timber wastes re-processed on- function is the collection of driftwood and site. Metals, plastics and other material streams other debris. They are equipped with hydraulic were segregated and removed to our specialist cranes, long-reach grab attachments and recycling supply chain. salvage pumps. The PLA had previously removed items into their own skips at various locations on the river. The McGrath facility provided a convenient location for us to discharge wastes collected from the Thames.
    [Show full text]
  • London Plan Implementation Report Safeguarded Wharves on the River Thames Mayor of London 1
    London Plan Implementation Report Safeguarded Wharves on the River Thames London Plan Implementation Report January 2005 Cover photo stories: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 JJ Prior delivering aggregates to RMC Fulham (Comley’s Wharf). The aggregates, sand and gravel, originate from Prior’s quarry at Fingringhoe on the River Colne near Colchester. Prior owns seven aggregate vessels ranging in size from 250 to 600 tonne cargo carrying capacity. The vessels load directly from the quarry and delivery direct to upriver aggregates facilities, carrying approximately 160,000 tonnes per year. These small ships make a huge contribution to keeping heavy lorries off London’s streets. In recognition of this, the company has received several Freight Facilities Grants towards the cost of vessel refurbishment. 2 A panorama of two safeguarded Wandsworth terminals: Cringle Dock, a waste transfer station owned by the Western Riverside Waste Authority and operated by Cory Environmental; and RMC Battersea, owned and operated as a concrete batching plant by RMC. These two berths primarily handle cargo that has been transhipped within the Port of London, sea-dredged aggregates and cement arriving at RMC Battersea from terminals in Greenwich, Northfleet and Greenhithe and household waste barged from Cringle Dock to Mucking in Essex. In 2001, over 375,000 tonnes of cargo was handled at these two terminals, which kept over 51,000 lorry movements of the capital’s streets. 3 A Cory Environmental owned tug pulling a pair of dumb barges upstream through Lambeth Bridge carrying empty containers for loading with household waste at two safeguarded water transfer stations in Wandsworth (Western Riverside Waste Transfer Station and Cringle Dock).
    [Show full text]
  • Port Trades Origins and Destinations Report
    London is the UK’s most diverse port in terms of cargoes handled. The following case studies of terminal operators participating in PLA research demonstrates some of the variety of locations and cargoes handled. North Sea Jetty is the larger of Brett Aggregates Group’s two facilities on ț the Thames. It handles some one The Port of London plays an The river is an important route for onward and a quarter million tonnes of sand distribution of goods by water, handling and gravel a year, principally from essential role as a transport hub newly consented dredging grounds two to three million tonnes of goods annually. nationally, for the South East region in the Eastern English Channel and established licences in the North and locally within London, Essex Sea and around the Isle of White. and Kent. Each year the Port The Thames: Just under half of the terminal’s throughput is used on site in ț Accounted for 77% of all sea-dredged aggregates block making, concrete production and bagging. handles in excess of 50 million moved in UK waterways in 2006. A further quarter leaves the site from dedicated rail sidings for tonnes of cargo. depots in South and West London; the remaining quarter is transported by road to concrete plants and other sites in the Economic impact South East. This report summarises the findings Earlier research has concluded that the Port of The company is investing in new conveyors at the site, both to Cobelfret Ferries operates a three of research commissioned by the increase the rate of discharge from dredgers and to load vessels London makes a major economic contribution to the times weekday ro-ro service for for transhipment upstream.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail Bill
    IN PARLIAMENT HOUSE OF COMMONS SESSION 2005-06 CROSSRAIL BILL AGAINST - ON MERITS - PRAYING TO BE HEARD BY COUNSEL. &C. TO THE HONOURABLE THE COMMONS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND IN PARLIAMENT ASSEMBLED. THE HUMBLE PETITION of the PORT OF LONDON AUTHORITY SHEWETH as follows:- 1 A Bill (hereinafter referred to as "the Bill") has been introduced and is now pending in your honourable House intituled "A bill to make provision for a railway transport system running from Maidenhead, in the County of Berkshire, and Heathrow Airport, in the London Borough of Hillingdon, through central London to Shenfield, in the County of Essex, and Abbey Wood, in the London Borough of Greenwich; and for connected purposes". 2 The Bill is promoted by the Secretary of State for Transport. 3 Under clause 1 (Construction and maintenance of scheduled works) of the Bill the nominated undertaker may construct and maintain the works specified in Schedule 1 ("the Scheduled works") to the Bill. The Scheduled works include Work No. 1/5. Work No. 1/5 is a railway extending through the existing Connaught Tunnel ("the Tunnel"). It includes a station at Custom House (being a reconfiguration of the existing North London Line Custom House Station) and alteration of the Tunnel. The Scheduled works also include Works Nos. 1/6A and 1/6B which are railways in tunnel beneath the River Thames, Work No. 1/29 which is a jetty for construction purposes in the River Lea, and Works Nos. 1/38A and 1/38B which are a wharf and a conveyor for construction purposes over the River Thames.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Control Post Contact Details TRACES Code Type of Transport
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Additional specifications TRACES Categories of animals and Border Control Post Contact details Type of transport Inspection centres regarding the scope of the code goods and specifications designation Aberdeen Harbour Board, Harbour Office, 16 Regent Quay, Aberdeen, AB11 5SS [email protected] Aberdeen Harbour Board P P, PP, PP(WP), OO 01224 597000 09:00 - 17:00 www.aberdeen-harbour.co.uk BAA Aberdeen, Aberdeen Airport, Farburn Terrace, Dyce, Aberdeen, AB21 7DU. [email protected] AGS Airport Aberdeen A P, PP, PP(WP),OO 0844 481 6666 24 hours https://www.aberdeenairport.com/ Dnata, Unit 7_8, Cargo Glasgow Airport, Abbotsinch, Paisley, Terminal, Campsie Drive, Renfrewshire, PA3 2SW Glasgow Airport, Abbotsinch, [email protected] AGS Glasgow A Paisley, PA3 2SG P, PP, PP(WP), OO 0844 481 5555 0141 847 4576 24 hours www.dnata.com www.glasgowairport.com 24 hours Associated British Ports Holdings Plc, Old Quay, Teignmouth, TQ14 8ES Associated British Ports [email protected] P PP, PP(WP), OO Holdings, Teignmouth 1626 774044 Monday - Friday 08:30 - 17:00 https://www.abports.co.uk/locations/teignmouth/ Associated British Ports, Port Office, North Harbour Street, Ayr, KA8 8AH [email protected] Associated British Ports, Ayr P P, PP 01292 281687 24 hours https://www.abports.co.uk/locations/ayr Associated British Ports, Port Office, Atlantic Way, Barry, CF63 3US. [email protected] Associated British Ports, Barry P PP(WP), OO 0870609669 Mon - Friday 08:30 - 17:00 www.abports.co.uk
    [Show full text]