DOCSLIB.ORG

Origin and Treatment of Hydrocompaction in the San Joaquin Valley, Ca, Usa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Origin and Treatment of Hydrocompaction in the San Joaquin Valley, Ca, Usa ORIGIN AND TREATMENT OF HYDROCOMPACTION IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY, CA, USA Nikola P. Prokopovich United States Bureau of Reclamation Sacramento, California Abstract Hydrocompact ion is a property of some dry sediments which causes them to spontaneously slump, crack and collapse after wetting. In California's San Joaquin Valley, hydrocompaction with vertical displacements up to 5 m and cracks up to 2 m wide has spotty occurrences in Pleistocene mudflow deposits. After completion of the process, the originally hazardous deposits become stable. The probable origin of hydrocompact ion in Cali­ fornia and in some loess deposits is Pleistocene, periglacial, sublimation of near surface wet deposits, expanded by previous freezing. Hydrocompaction in California affected two reaches of the San Luis Canal and alinements of several associated pipelines. In order to prevent postconstruction damage, 32.5 km of canal alinement and 90 km of selected pipeline alinements were flooded prior to construction, at a cost of some 8 million dollars. No failures have occurred in prewetted areas. Addi­ tional wetting of some untreated road crossings and pipeline laterals is under consideration, due to numerous failures in nonprewetted areas. Introduction The paper briefly summarizes data on distribution and treatment of hydrocompaction in a major irrigation project in the semiarid, west- central portion of the San Joaquin Valley, California, USA (Fig. 1). The project, known as the San Luis Unit of the Central Valley Project, consists of several dams, canals, underground distribution pipelines, and associated structures (Anonymous, 1981). Bureau studies of hydrocom­ paction included delineation of areas potentially susceptible to hydrocom­ paction, estimates of ultimate amounts of hydrocompaction, selection of methods to control the destructive effects of hydrocompaction, precon- struction treatment of selected alinements and evaluation of the effi­ ciency of this treatment. The text is based mostly on.data collected during two decades of preconstruction, construction and postconstruction studies by the Federal Bureau of Reclamation. The ideas expressed in this paper are, however, those of the author and may not represent the official view of the Bureau. Hydrocompaction - General Data Hydrocompaction occurs in some dry, unconsolidated, porous semiarid, and arid deposits when they lose their dry strength after wetting (sometimes rapidly), and develop spontaneous settling, slumpage, and cracking. The process can be one of the most rapid and highly destructive forms of subsidence. Typical surface expressions of active hydrocompaction are soil cracks and settling, development of "sinkholes" similar to karst sinks, undulatory fields, piping, and structural damage to houses, industrial and agricultural structures, railroads, highways, and bridges. Particularly severe damage occurs to dams, canals, ditches and wells (Fig. 2). The process is frequently related to human activity, such as irrigation, construction of canals, urbanization, disposal of industrial wastewater, etc. 537 SACRAMENTO I TRACY ) /A PUMPING PLANT^Â.6j? DELTA-MENDOTA CANAL CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT SAN LUIS DAM, RES. a -^<:\^?|>/ PUMPING-GENERATING PLANT \jA LOS BANOS DETENTION DAM S RESERVOIR LITTLE PANOCHE DETENTION DAM d RES. SAN LUIS CANAL .-, FRIANT 2 \ DAM PLEASANT VALLEY PUMPING PLANT a COALINGÀ CANAL SAN LUIS 5 DRAIN HYDROCOMPACTION (CONSTRUCTED) SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY SERVICE \ 5 AREA w BOUNDARY 0 ,1 FEDERAL PROPOSED /^-CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT Hit Mil FEDERAL CONSTRUCTED /'•/ • / •FRIANT- STATE CONSTRUCTED .It? / KERN t! / CANAL JOINT CONSTRUCTED t e s* « PUMPING PLANT BAKERSFIELD 0 50 Ml h 80 KM \. / Fig. 1. San Luis Unit and other major Federal and State conveyance systems in the San Joaqin Valley, California. 538 Fig. 2. Typical damage due to hydrocompaction in the San Joaquin Valley: (A) Hydrocompaction cracks. (B) 3-4 m deep "sink holes", partially flooded by irrigation runoff in an originally flat leveled field. Note high-power line for scale. (C) An originally flat field-road became undulatory by hydrocompaction due to irrigation. (D) Cracking of a farm workshop due to irrigation of surrounding fields. (E) Cracking and separation of concrete lining of a small irrigation ditch. (F) Damages to the 10-cm-thick concrete lining in a test canal section (State of California, "Mendota Test Site"). Hydrocompaction is known to exist in several areas of the United States and abroad (Anonymous, 1959, 1963; Bull, 1961, 1964; Drashevska, 1962; Dudley, 1970; Lin and Liang, 1980; Lofgren, 1969) . The phenomenon is described under various terms such as "shallow subsidence", "near-surface 539 subsidence", "hydroconsolidation", "soil settling", "soil settling by wetting", "collapsing soils", etc. Some of these terms are misleading. For example, the term "shallow subsidence", previously used in the San Joaquin Valley (Poland, 1958), is misleading because (1) the process may not be restricted to near-surface deposits and can occur at depths of over 30-40 m and (2) the uppermost near-surface deposits may be stable, while deposits occurring at depth can be susceptible to hydrocompaction. The term, "hydroconsolidation", can be associated with some form of consoli­ dation by cementation, etc. The term "hydrocompaction", used by the Bureau of Reclamation (Anonymous, 1963; Hall and Carlson, 1965; Prokopo- vich, 1963) and by the U.S. Geological Survey (Lofgren, 1969), and others properly reflects the nature of the process and is used in the following text. Rates and total amounts of hydrocompaction vary greatly depending upon the initial susceptibility of the sediment to hydrocompaction, past hydrocompaction, and the amount and type of water application. Gentle water application by sprinkling may cause less damaging but longer lasting hydrocompaction. After the completion of hydrocompaction, sometimes several years after the initial wetting, the originally hazardous deposits become stable. Susceptibility to hydrocompaction is controlled by (1) the development of an excessively porous deposit with a low dry density and a low moisture content, but with a relatively high dry strength which prevents spon­ taneous compaction and (2) aridity of past and present climates which prevents "natural hydrocompaction" of deposits. The origin of excessively porous deposits susceptible to hydrocompaction is not completely estab­ lished and may be polygenetic. Several theories of origin were considered for the San Joaquin Valley. Periglacial, Pleistocene sublimation of ice in frozen, newly deposited, initially wet sediments, expanded by freezing, seems to be a reasonable explanation of the origin of hydrocompaction in California's San Joaquin Valley and in many loess deposits in both North America and Eurasia. Such origin was duplicated in laboratory experiments by the author. In California, the "freeze-drying" was accomplished by westerly winds bringing downward moving and, therefore, relatively dry, air masses into the Valley (Fig. 3). SAN JOAOUIN VALLEY Fig. 3. Air circulation patterns in the San Joaquin Valley, California. 540 Hydrocompaction in California In California, at the present time, hydrocompact ion has "spotty" occur­ rence along the Coast Range foothills on the western margin of the southwestern portion of the arid San Joaquin Valley (Fig. 4), where it affects two major water conveyance systems — the San Luis Canal and the California Aqueduct. Typical deposits here, affected by hydrocompaction, are composed of clayey Pleistocene inter fan piedmont alluvium deposited mostly as mudflows. Such interfans are composed of minor, coalescent poorly defined fans of small arroyos. These isolated patches of alluvium, susceptible to hydrocompaction, are separated by fluvial alluvium of major ephemeral Coast Range streams (Fig. 4). The maximum amount of hydrocom­ paction here is up to 5m. Some hydrocompaction cracks were over 2 m wide and were probed to a depth of about 10 m. The initial total thickness of sediments susceptible to hydrocompaction was in an order of 65 m. At the present time, much of the alluvium initially susceptible to hydrocompaction has become "stable" due to wetting caused by irrigation. Since the 1940's, with advanced farming and widespread irrigation, hydrocompaction caused extensive damages to irrigation wells, ditches, pipelines, roads, bridges, fields and buildings (Fig. 2). Hydrocompaction in the region was probably first noted in 1915, after construction of the now abandoned Chaney Pumping Station in an undeveloped terrain (Sneddon, 1951). Hydrocompaction here was kept well under control for decades by keeping the station perimeter dry through diversion of wastewater and by restriction of irrigation. Since 1955-60, the hydro- compaction has become particularly important due to scheduled con­ struction of the San Luis Canal and its distribution system by the Federal Bureau of Reclamation, and associated developments of the State Water Project (Anonymous, 1974, 1974A). U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Studies of Hydrocompaction U.S.B.R. studies of hydrocompaction, initially carried out as part of an interagency investigation of subsidence in California (Poland, 1958), were accelerated since 1961-62, as engineering-geologic preconstruction, construction and postconstruction studies of hydrocompaction. These studies included (1) evaluation of numerous proposed methods of detection of sediments susceptible to hydrocompaction (Prokopovich, 1963, 1984), (2) estimates of ultimate amounts of future hydrocompaction,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California's San Joaquin Valley: a Region and Its Children Under Stress
    CALIFORNIA’S SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY: A REGION AND ITS CHILDREN UNDER STRESS January 2017 Commissioned by Study Conducted by California’s San Joaquin Valley: A Region and Its Children Under Stress January 2017 Dear Colleagues, We are pleased to share with you California’s San Joaquin Valley: A Region and its Children Under Stress, commissioned by the San Joaquin Valley Health Fund, with funding from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation and Sierra Health Foundation, and prepared by the UC Davis Center for Regional Change. In preparing this report, researchers met with residents and those working with and on behalf of Valley communities to learn what their priorities are for policy and systems change. As detailed in the report, their quest for a more equitable region is focused on several priorities that include early education, healthy food, healthy living environments and equitable land use planning as the primary issues of concern. While the report documents the many racial, health and other inequities, and the particular effects they have on the lives and life chances of families raising children in the region, it also presents the vision of local leaders and community residents. We know the challenges that lie ahead will be difficult to address. While the San Joaquin Valley includes the top agricultural producing counties in California, almost 400,000 of the region’s children live in poverty and seven of the 10 counties with the highest child poverty rates in the state are in the Valley. One out of every four Valley children experiences food insecurity and they are much more likely to be exposed to pesticides while in school and to go to schools with unsafe drinking water.
    [Show full text]
  • San Joaquin Valley, California
    SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Largest human alteration of the Earth’s surface CALIFORNIA ining ground water for agriculture has enabled the San Joaquin Valley of California to become one of the world’s most productive agricultural regions, while simulta- S a M c neously contributing to one of the single largest alterations of the r a m C land surface attributed to humankind. Today the San Joaquin Valley e n t o is the backbone of California’s modern and highly technological E R . S N . agricultural industry. California ranks as the largest agricultural R r I e h t producing state in the nation, producing 11 T E a e F R percent of the total U.S. agricultural value. R R A The Central Valley of California, which A L includes the San Joaquin Valley, the Sacra- Delta mento Valley, and the Sacramento-San N E Joaquin Delta, produces about 25 percent S V a n A of the nation’s table food on only 1 percent San Francisco Bay Jo a D q of the country’s farmland (Cone, 1997). u A in V R iver In 1970, when the last comprehensive sur- A Mendota L veys of land subsidence were made, sub- L sidence in excess of 1 foot had affected E more than 5,200 square miles of irrigable Y San Joaquin Valley P land—one-half the entire San Joaquin a c i Valley (Poland and others, 1975). The f i c maximum subsidence, near Mendota, was O c more than 28 feet. e a n 0 80 Miles 0 80 Kilometers Approximate location of maxi- mum subsidence in United States identified by research efforts of Joseph Poland (pic- tured).
    [Show full text]
  • Historic, Recent, and Future Subsidence, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, USA
    UC Davis San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science Title Historic, Recent, and Future Subsidence, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, USA Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7xd4x0xw Journal San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 8(2) ISSN 1546-2366 Authors Deverel, Steven J Leighton, David A Publication Date 2010 DOI https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2010v8iss2art1 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7xd4x0xw#supplemental License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California august 2010 Historic, Recent, and Future Subsidence, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, USA Steven J. Deverel1 and David A. Leighton Hydrofocus, Inc., 2827 Spafford Street, Davis, CA 95618 AbStRACt will range from a few cm to over 1.3 m (4.3 ft). The largest elevation declines will occur in the central To estimate and understand recent subsidence, we col- Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta. From 2007 to 2050, lected elevation and soils data on Bacon and Sherman the most probable estimated increase in volume below islands in 2006 at locations of previous elevation sea level is 346,956,000 million m3 (281,300 ac-ft). measurements. Measured subsidence rates on Sherman Consequences of this continuing subsidence include Island from 1988 to 2006 averaged 1.23 cm year-1 increased drainage loads of water quality constitu- (0.5 in yr-1) and ranged from 0.7 to 1.7 cm year-1 (0.3 ents of concern, seepage onto islands, and decreased to 0.7 in yr-1). Subsidence rates on Bacon Island from arability.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of San Joaquin County Economic & Social Indicators
    SJC Index San Joaquin County 2020 Analysis of San Joaquin County Economic & Social Indicators Prepared by: Meredith Huang, Jeremy Padge and Thomas E. Pogue 2 Forward This report is being released in fall 2020, a year defined by extreme social and economic change due to the global COVID‐19 pandemic. At this time, very few of the indicators highlighted in this report have any local, San Joaquin County, data available for 2020, and what is available covers only the very initial stages of the pandemic. As a result, we have decided to only present data indicators in this report through the end of 2019. In this sense, we believe it provides a useful snapshot of the current state and progress of San Joaquin County just prior to the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic. As we review these indicators in the future, some social, economic, and demographic characteristics of the county described in these pages will return to pre‐pandemic trends while others may be fundamentally changed. Thus, this edition of the San Joaquin County Index can serve as a useful benchmark for measuring the effects of COVID‐19, and a picture of the County’s comparative profile without the confounding effects of COVID‐19 that have made many traditional data indicators difficult to interpret. By reviewing data indicators for San Joaquin County and its communities in comparison to the other counties, regions, the state and the nation, the Index fosters a shared understanding about opportunities and challenges. Thus, the Index provides a foundation of reliable information to support actions to advance economic and community development.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.8 Geology and Soils
    Environmental Impact Analysis Geology and Soils 4.8 Geology and Soils This section discusses impacts of the 2018 RTP/SCS pertaining to geologic conditions in the San Joaquin County Planning Area. 4.8.1 Setting San Joaquin County is located within the Great Valley Geomorphic Province, an asymmetrical synclinal trough, approximately 50 miles wide and 400 miles long. The region is an unusual lowland in that sediments within the basin are relatively underformed, while the surrounding rock units are highly deformed. Little geologic variation exists within the Great Valley, with surficial deposits consisting primarily of unconsolidated Quaternary sediments. The Great Valley is flanked on the east by the west-sloping Sierran bedrock surface, which continues westward beneath alluvium and older sediments. The Western border is underlain by east-dipping Cretaceous and Cenozoic strata that form a deeply buried synclinal trough. The San Joaquin Valley comprises the southern portion of the Great Valley, while the Sacramento Valley is present in the northern portion. Oil fields follow anticlinal uplifts that mark the southwestern border of the San Joaquin Valley and its southernmost basin. The Sacramento Valley plain is interrupted by the Marysville Buttes, an isolated Pliocene volcanic plug approximately 2,000 feet high. Existing geologic, soils, and flooding conditions are briefly summarized below. a. Existing Conditions Geologic Formations San Joaquin County is located at the northern end of the San Joaquin Valley, a sedimentary basin filled with an up to 6-mile thick sequence of interbedded clay, silt, sand, and gravel deposits ranging in age from more than 144 million years old to less than 10,000 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Draft
    Chapter 11 Geology and Soils This chapter describes the affected environment for geology and soils, as well as potential environmental consequences and associated mitigation measures, as they pertain to implementing the alternatives. This chapter presents information on the primary study area (area of project features, the Temperance Flat Reservoir Area, and Millerton Lake below RM 274). It also discusses the extended study area (San Joaquin River from Friant Dam to the Merced River, the San Joaquin River from the Merced River to the Delta, the Delta, and the CVP and SWP water service areas). Affected Environment This section describes the affected environment related to geology, geologic hazards, erosion and sedimentation, geomorphology, mineral resources, soils, and salts. Where appropriate, geology and soils characteristics are described in a regional context, including geologic provinces, physiographic regions, or other large-scale areas, with some area-specific geologic maps and descriptions of specific soil associations. Geology This section describes the geology of the primary and extended study areas. Primary Study Area A description of the surficial geologic units encountered in the primary study area is presented in Table 11-1. Geologic maps of the primary study area and the area of project features are presented in Figure 11-1 and Figure 11-2, respectively. Draft – August 2014 – 11-1 Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Environmental Impact Statement Table 11-1. Description of Surficial Geologic Units of the Primary Study Area Geologic Map of Millerton Lake Quadrangle, West-Central Sierra Nevada, California1 Formation Surficial Deposits General Features Abbreviation Plutonic rocks characterized by undeformed blocky hornblende prisms as long as 1 cm and by biotite books as Tonalite of Blue Canyon much as 5 mm across.
    [Show full text]
  • K Fixation in the San Joaquin Valley from Soil Texture 3
    Potassium Fixation in the San Joaquin Valley Daniel Geisseler and William R. Horwath Location and origin of potassium fixation in the San Joaquin Valley Reports of potassium (K) deficient plants on Further work by the same group revealed a wide range of soils on the east side of the San that vermiculite, the major K-fixing mineral in Joaquin Valley date back to the early 1960s [7]. these soils, was most often found in the silt and Potassium deficiency was estimated to affect 15 fine-sand fractions [5]. For this reason, the to 20% of the cotton fields in the San Joaquin relationship between soil texture and K fixation Valley in the early eighties [1]. capacity was found to be weak [4]. In a study funded by FREP, Pettygrove and Southard developed a map showing the location of potentially K-fixing soils in the southern San Joaquin Valley using Soil Survey data and data from the CDFA cotton database [6]. The resulting map shows that the total area of potentially K-fixing soils is approximately 1.4 million acres (Figure 1). Potassium fixation was found to occur in soils formed from Sierra Nevadan alluvium, located on the east side of the San Joaquin Valley. In contrast, soils formed in Coastal Range alluvium do not fix K, except to a small extent in deeper horizons. In general, K-fixing soils are either weakly developed soils with high mica content or intermediately developed soils having high Figure 1: Potentially K-fixing soils based on model and land in vermiculite clay mineralogy [6].
    [Show full text]
  • Tulare Basin, California
    NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY NOTES 'ro USERS TULARE BASIN CALIFORNIA 1:100,000 SCALE MAPS National Wetland Inventory Notes to Users Tulare Basin California INTRODUCTION: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife service, office of Habitat Resources, is conducting an inventory of the wetlands of the United States. The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) is establishing a wetland data base in both map and computer forms for the entire country. The NWI information will serve to identify the current status of U.S. wetlands and can be used as a reference point from which future changes in wetlands can be evaluated. PURPOSE: The purpose of Notes to Users is to provide general information regarding the production of NWI maps and wetlands found within a relatively similar geographic area. Notes to Users are not intended to include complete description of all wetlands found in the area nor provide complete plant species information. AREA COVERED: The area covered is defined by the Fresno ~w, SW and Bakersfield NW, SW intermediate scale USGS maps (1:100,000). The area falls within the San Joaquin Valley and the western slope of the Sierra Nevada range. Bailey's Ecoregion Classification (1978) identifies the San Joaquin Valley as the California Grassland Province (2610) and the Sierra Nevada as the Sierran Forest Province (M2610). PHYSIOGRAPHY: The topography of the area is characterized by the flat alluvial plain of the San Joaquin Valley and the Sierra Nevada range which forms a barrier on the eastern side of the valley. The eastern slope of the Sierra Nevada range has many deeply cut river canyons.
    [Show full text]
  • San Joaquin Valley Region Report
    CALIFORNIA’S FOURTH CLIMATE CHANGE ASSESSMENT PREVIEW San Joaquin Valley Region Report Coordinating Agencies: CALIFORNIA’S FOURTH CLIMATE CHANGE ASSESSMENT Introduction to California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment alifornia is a global leader in using, investing in, and advancing research to set proactive climate change policy, and its Climate Change Assessments provide the scientific foundation for understanding climate- related vulnerability at the local scale and informing resilience actions. The Climate Change Assessments directly inform State policies, plans, programs, and guidance to promote effective and integrated action to Csafeguard California from climate change. California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment (Fourth Assessment) advances actionable science that serves the growing needs of state and local-level decision-makers from a variety of sectors. This cutting-edge research initiative is comprised of a wide-ranging body of technical reports, including rigorous, comprehensive climate change scenarios at a scale suitable for illuminating regional vulnerabilities and localized adaptation strategies in California; datasets and tools that improve integration of observed and projected knowledge about climate change into decision- making; and recommendations and information to directly inform vulnerability assessments and adaptation strategies for California’s energy sector, water resources and management, oceans and coasts, forests, wildfires, agriculture, biodiversity and habitat, and public health. In addition, these technical reports have been distilled into summary reports and a brochure, allowing the public and decision-makers to easily access relevant findings from the Fourth Assessment. • A concise summary of the Fourth Assessment’s most important findings and conclusions. • An in-depth report on how California’s people, built KEY FINDINGS environment, and ecosystems will be impacted by climate change and how we can proactively adapt, based on the Fourth Assessment’s findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps of Quaternary Deposits and Liquefaction Susceptibility in the Central San Francisco Bay Region, California Final Technical Report
    Maps of Quaternary Deposits and Liquefaction Susceptibility in the Central San Francisco Bay Region, California Final Technical Report U.S. Geological Survey Grant Award Numbers 99HQGR0095 and 05HQGR0151 Completed April 2006 By 1Witter, R.C., 2Knudsen, K.L, 1Sowers, J.M., 3Wentworth, C.M., 1Koehler, R.D., 1Randolph, C.E., 3Brooks, S.K., and 3Gans, K.D. 1 - William Lettis & Associates, Inc. 2 - California Geological Survey 3 - U.S. Geological Survey ADDENDUM: The final technical report for U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) grant award numbers 99HQGR0095 and 05HQGR0151 was prepared as a single publication consisting of electronic maps and accompanying text published in April of 2006 as USGS Open-File Report 2006-1037: Witter, R.C., Knudsen, K.L, Sowers, J.M., Wentworth, C.M., Koehler, R.D., Randolph, C.E., Brooks, S.K., and Gans, K.D., 2006, Maps of Quaternary deposits and liquefaction susceptibility in the central San Francisco Bay region, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1037. (http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1037/) This document consists of three parts including: Part 1. Introduction and Description of Database; Part 2. Open-File Report 2006-1037 Revision List; and Part 3. Description of Mapping and Liquefaction Interpretation Additional products of this research include postscript and PDF files of the Quaternary Deposits and Liquefaction Susceptibility Maps of the central San Francisco Bay region at 1:200,000 scale. Because of the large volume of these files, we do not include the maps here. However, the maps along with complete Geographic Information System database files can be downloaded at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1037/ ERRATA: Please note that in the original publication we inadvertently omitted the acknowledgement of support from USGS grant award number 05HQGR0151.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California
    SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA The sinking heart of the state CALIFORNIA he Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta of California was once a Sacramento great tidal freshwater marsh. It is blanketed by peat and T peaty alluvium deposited where streams originating in the . Sierra Nevada, Coast Ranges, and South Cascade Range enter San R es n Francisco Bay. m u Sacramento River s o C In the late 1800s levees were built along the stream channels and the land thus protected from flooding was drained, cleared, and planted. Although the Delta is now an exceptionally rich agricul- tural area (over $500 million crop value as of 1993), its unique value DELTA is as a source of freshwater for the rest of the State. It is the heart of a Chipps Island massive north-to-south water-delivery system. Much of this water is pumped southward for use in the San Joaquin Valley and elsewhere Stockton in central and southern California. Mt. Diablo San Joaquin River Mt. Diablo The leveed tracts and islands help to protect water-export facilities in the southern Delta from saltwater intrusion by displacing water and maintaining favorable freshwater gradients. However, ongoing subsidence behind the levees increases stresses on the levee system, making it less stable, and thus threatens to degrade water quality in the massive north-to-south water-transfer system. Most subsidence 0 15 Miles in the Delta is caused by oxidation of organic carbon in peat soils. 0 15 Kilometers THE DELTA MARSHES TEEMED WITH WILDLIFE When Spanish explorers first viewed the Delta from Mount Diablo in 1772, the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers were in flood, and they mistook it for a great inland sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Water and the Future of the San Joaquin Valley 3
    FEBRUARY 2019 Ellen Hanak, Water and the Future of Alvar Escriva-Bou, Brian Gray, the San Joaquin Valley Sarge Green, Thomas Harter, Jelena Jezdimirovic, Jay Lund, Josué Medellín-Azuara, Peter Moyle, Nathaniel Seavy Supported with funding from the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation, the TomKat Foundation, the US Department of Agriculture, the US Environmental Protection Agency, and the Water Foundation © 2019 Public Policy Institute of California PPIC is a public charity. It does not take or support positions on any ballot measures or on any local, state, or federal legislation, nor does it endorse, support, or oppose any political parties or candidates for public office. Short sections of text, not to exceed three paragraphs, may be quoted without written permission provided that full attribution is given to the source. Research publications reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or of the staff, officers, advisory councils, or board of directors of the Public Policy Institute of California. SUMMARY CONTENTS The San Joaquin Valley—California’s largest agricultural region and an important contributor to the nation’s food supply—is in a time of great change. Acronyms 5 The valley is ground zero for many of California’s most difficult water Chapter 1. Introduction 6 management problems—including groundwater overdraft, drinking water contamination, and declines in habitat and native species. Chapter 2. Balancing Water Supplies Local water supplies are limited, particularly in the southern half of the region. and Demands 14 To irrigate their crops, many farmers use water imported from the Sacramento– Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]