Master's Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Master's Thesis University of Economics, Prague Master’s Thesis 2016 Lucie Pospíšilová University of Economics, Prague Faculty of Business Administration Master’s Field: International Management Title of the Master’s Thesis: Continuous Management of a Retail Product Category Author: Bc. Lucie Pospíšilová Supervisor: doc. Ing. Jan Koudelka, CSc. Declaration of Authenticity I hereby declare that the Master’s Thesis presented herein is my own work, or fully and specifically acknowledged wherever adapted from other sources. This work has not been published or submitted elsewhere for the requirement of a degree programme. Prague, May 9, 2016 Lucie Pospíšilová Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor, doc. Ing. Jan Koudelka, CSc. for his guidance. Furthermore, I would like to thank everybody, who provided me with necessary data and information and mainly my advisor from Ahold Czech Republic, Petr Hubený for his time and valuable advice. Title of the Master’s Thesis: Continuous Management of a Retail Product Category Abstract: The aim of the thesis is to describe the Czech retail industry and the practice used in the category management. The work compares and evaluates the current state of the ice-cream category management in different retail chains and recommends changes for the next ice-cream season for one of the retailers. The description of the retail industry and the introduction set the background for the thesis and the explanation of the continuous category management provides the framework for the analysis. The empirical part conducts the category planning step by step. The key parts are category assessment and category scorecard, which benchmark different stores in terms of assortment, display, price, and promo. Finally, recommendations and conclusions are derived from the analysis to improve the category performance. Key words: Category Management, Retail Industry, Benchmarking, Category Planning Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2 Retail Industry .................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Types of Retailers ........................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Retailers Worldwide .................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Retailers in the Czech Republic ................................................................................... 6 3 Category Management ........................................................................................................ 9 3.1 Definition ................................................................................................................... 10 3.1.1 Merchandising .................................................................................................... 11 3.1.2 Further Terminology .......................................................................................... 11 3.2 Continuous Category Management Process .............................................................. 12 3.2.1 Retailer Strategy ................................................................................................. 13 3.2.2 Category Planning .............................................................................................. 14 3.2.3 Implementation ................................................................................................... 21 3.2.4 Performance Review........................................................................................... 21 3.3 Challenges and Benefits ............................................................................................. 22 3.4 Competitive Advantage ............................................................................................. 22 4 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 24 4.1 Observations .............................................................................................................. 24 4.2 Analysed Stores ......................................................................................................... 25 4.3 Analytical Tools ......................................................................................................... 26 4.3.1 Seasonal Index .................................................................................................... 26 4.3.2 Regression Analysis ........................................................................................... 27 5 Ice-cream Market .............................................................................................................. 29 5.1 Market Structure ........................................................................................................ 29 5.2 Shopper Insights ........................................................................................................ 30 5.3 Summer and Winter Season ....................................................................................... 31 6 Ahold Retail Chain ........................................................................................................... 32 6.1 Retailer’s Strategy ...................................................................................................... 32 6.2 Target Customer ........................................................................................................ 34 7 Category Definition .......................................................................................................... 35 7.1 Consumer decision tree .............................................................................................. 36 7.2 Consumer perception ................................................................................................. 37 7.3 Seasonality ................................................................................................................. 38 8 Category Role ................................................................................................................... 40 8.1 Basket category .......................................................................................................... 40 8.2 Objectives .................................................................................................................. 41 9 Category Assessment ........................................................................................................ 42 9.1 Assortment ................................................................................................................. 42 9.1.1 Supermarkets ...................................................................................................... 42 9.1.2 Hypermarkets...................................................................................................... 44 9.2 Display ....................................................................................................................... 46 9.2.1 Supermarkets ...................................................................................................... 46 9.2.2 Hypermarkets...................................................................................................... 47 9.3 Price ........................................................................................................................... 49 9.3.1 Supermarkets ...................................................................................................... 49 9.3.2 Hypermarkets...................................................................................................... 50 9.4 Promotion ................................................................................................................... 52 9.4.1 Supermarkets ...................................................................................................... 52 9.4.2 Hypermarkets...................................................................................................... 54 9.5 Summary .................................................................................................................... 55 10 Category Scorecard........................................................................................................... 57 10.1 Sales and Margins .................................................................................................. 57 10.2 Category Influencing Factors ................................................................................. 59 10.3 Opportunities .......................................................................................................... 63 11 Category Strategy ............................................................................................................. 64 12 Category Tactics ............................................................................................................... 66 12.1 Assortment ............................................................................................................. 66 12.2 Display ................................................................................................................... 66 12.3 Price ........................................................................................................................ 68 12.4 Promotion ..............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Unternehmen Angriff Des
    Unternehmen Angriff des as Gelöbnis bestand aus Lidl: Kein Handelskonzern agiert verschwiegener, einem leise vorgetragenen kurzen Satz: Ja, er habe keiner wächst rasanter als der Discounter seine Lebensmittel unter aus Neckarsulm. Unternehmensgründer Dieter Schwarz DEinstandspreis verkauft, gestand Karl ist geradezu beseelt von der Idee, Albrecht vor den Teilnehmern der hochkarätigen Runde ein. Aber er den Erzrivalen Aldi von Platz eins zu verdrängen. Im verpflichte sich, dies künftig zu Ausland ist ihm das bereits gelungen. unterlassen. Einige Sekunden lang herrschte Totenstille in dem Raum. Der Herr über Aldi Süd hatte ge- zuvor bei Buletten und Bier noch ein- mender Gegner für die Aldi-Brüder sprochen. Und wenn ein Albrecht mal klar gemacht, dass eine Abspra- geworden. Mit innovativen Konzep- spricht, meint er nicht nur sich allein, che für ihn nicht infrage komme: ten und bisweilen rüden Geschäfts- sondern die gesamte Branche. „Das muss der Markt regeln“, ließ er methoden hat sich der Krämer aus Gemeinsam mit Topmanagern aus die Handelsfürsten wissen. dem Süden auf Platz zwei der deut- Handel und Industrie hatte sich die Das Gelöbnis von Karl Albrecht schen Discount-Rangliste vorge- Krämerlegende im Oktober 1983 in hat Dieter Schwarz bis heute nicht arbeitet: Das Schwarz-Imperium be- Berlin eingefunden, um die existenz- vergessen. Und nicht verziehen. Seit treibt heute mehr als 5600 Läden und bedrohenden Rabattschlachten im dem denkwürdigen Treffen in Berlin beschäftigt rund 80 000 Mitarbeiter. deutschen Einzelhandel endlich zu hat der Lidl & Schwarz-Gründer nur Zu konkreten Bilanzzahlen gibt der beenden. Das Treffen unter Leitung ein Ziel: sich für die Sippenhaft zu re- Aufsteiger noch weniger Auskunft als des damaligen Kartellamtschefs vanchieren.
    [Show full text]
  • 20120621 Vorlesung DICE LK Verschickt
    MADE TO TRADE . Komplexität und Vielfalt im Lebensmittelhandel - Dr. Lars Koch Stand: 21. Juni 2012 | © METRO AG 2012 Agenda 1 METRO GROUP – Übersicht 2 Lebensmittelhandel im Überblick 3 Sortiment und Komplexität 4 Koordinationsbedarf zwischen Handel und Industrie 5 Wettbewerbsökonomische Aspekte des Handels MADE TO TRADE. Juni 2012 | © METRO AG 2012 1 METRO GROUP Geschäftsmodell Eines der international bedeutendsten Handelsunternehmen DAX-30-Unternehmen Präsenz an rund 2.200 Standorten in 33 Ländern Mehr als 280.000 Mitarbeiter aus knapp 180 Nationen Vier Vertriebslinien mit führenden Positionen Metro Cash & Carry: Selbstbedienungsgroßhandel Real: SB-Warenhäuser Media-Saturn: Elektrofachmärkte Galeria Kaufhof: Warenhäuser MADE TO TRADE. Juni 2012 | © METRO AG 2012 222 Konzernstruktur – Rahmendaten auf einen Blick Umsatz 31,2 Mrd. € 11,2 Mrd. € 20,6 Mrd. € 3,4 Mrd. € – EBIT 1 1.148 Mio. € 134 Mio. € 542 Mio. € 121 Mio. € 643 Mio. € Standorte 728 426 893 140 – Länder 30 6 16 2 30 Stand: 31. Dezember 2011 1Bereinigt um Sonder- faktoren aus Shape 2012 MADE TO TRADE. Juni 2012 | © METRO AG 2012 3 METRO GROUP: 2.187 Standorte in 33 Ländern Metro Cash & Carry 728 Standorte; Real 426 Standorte; Media-Saturn 893 Standorte; Galeria Kaufhof 140 Standorte Deutschland Indien Pakistan Spanien Ungarn Metro C&C 107 Metro C&C 9 Metro C&C 5 Makro C&C 34 Metro C&C 13 Real 316 Media-Saturn 68 Media-Saturn 21 Media-Saturn 389 Italien Polen Galeria Kaufhof 125 Metro C&C 48 Makro C&C 39 Tschechien Vereinigtes Königreich Media-Saturn 110 Real
    [Show full text]
  • Global Vs. Local-The Hungarian Retail Wars
    Journal of Business and Retail Management Research (JBRMR) October 2015 Global Vs. Local-The Hungarian Retail Wars Charles S. Mayer Reza M. Bakhshandeh Central European University, Budapest, Hungary Key Words MNE’s, SME’s, Hungary, FMCG Retailing, Cooperatives, Rivalry Abstract In this paper we explore the impact of the ivasion of large global retailers into the Hungarian FMCG space. As well as giving the historical evolution of the market, we also show a recipe on how the local SME’s can cope with the foreign competition. “If you can’t beat them, at least emulate them well.” 1. Introduction Our research started with a casual observation. There seemed to be too many FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods) stores in Hungary, compared to the population size, and the purchasing power. What was the reason for this proliferation, and what outcomes could be expected from it? Would the winners necessarily be the MNE’s, and the losers the local SME’S? These were the questions that focused our research for this paper. With the opening of the CEE to the West, large multinational retailers moved quickly into the region. This was particularly true for the extended food retailing sector (FMCG’s). Hungary, being very central, and having had good economic relations with the West in the past, was one of the more attractive markets to enter. We will follow the entry of one such multinational, Delhaize (Match), in detail. At the same time, we will note how two independent local chains, CBA and COOP were able to respond to the threat of the invasion of the multinationals.
    [Show full text]
  • Ilanrli^Fittr Ivtittitg Utraui .Row Afternoon
    ATCiaffs -Drily N «t P m s Run ■ te Ik e Wtoek Bnded The Weather Jtme 14, i N i . Cloudy with continuing ocat- ered riiowen and thundanhoir- era tbnl(ht and Uiroogh tomor^ 15,590 ilanrli^fitTr IvTittitg UTraUi .row afternoon. Tonight’s low In lUqncheMter-^A CU^ of Village Charm boa. Tomorrow'a high about N . VOL. LXXXVra, NO. 224 TWENTY-TWO PAGES MANCHESTER, CONN., MONDAY, JUNE 23, 1969 (CIsMUled Adverttohif on Fns« 18) PRICE TEN CENTS It’s as Long - LOXHSVILLE, Ky. (AP)— No Accord Reached John Bockey was watching two oil field workers trying Burger Takes Office, to measure a long pole that was leaning against a der­ rick. On State Tax Plan After they’d made guesses HARTFORD, Conn. ford Bald Sunday night the low­ — Additional budget cuts of that differed considerably, (A P ) — Democratfc sena­ er chamber would await action $30.0 million. Including $26 mil­ .Bockey asked: ’’Wouldn’t It be simpler to lay that pole tors caucused for two In the Senate, where Marcus hoe lion in educational reductions. —’Ihe bonding of current op- on the ground and measure hours today without reach­ vowed to launch a major of- Nixon Lauds Warren eratiom of the Department of how long It Is?” ing agreement on the tax fenclve to kill the tax package. package to be enacted at Community Affairs (DCA). “ No,” one woiker reddled. WASHINGTON (AP)— ’The House convened shortly —Continuation of the unincor­ ’’We’re trying to figure out Wairen Earl Burger was the special legislative ses­ before 10:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Businesses in Germany and the United States Since
    Family Businesses in Germany and the United States since Industrialisation A Long-Term Historical Study Family Businesses in Germany and the United States since Industrialisation – A Long-Term Historical Study Industrialisation since States – A Long-Term the United and Businesses Germany in Family Publication details Published by: Stiftung Familienunternehmen Prinzregentenstraße 50 80538 Munich Germany Tel.: +49 (0) 89 / 12 76 400 02 Fax: +49 (0) 89 / 12 76 400 09 E-mail: [email protected] www.familienunternehmen.de Prepared by: Institut für Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeschichte Platz der Göttinger Sieben 5 37073 Göttingen Germany Univ.-Prof. Dr. Hartmut Berghoff Privatdozent Dr. Ingo Köhler © Stiftung Familienunternehmen, Munich 2019 Cover image: bibi57 | istock, Sasin Tipchai | shutterstock Reproduction is permitted provided the source is quoted ISBN: 978-3-942467-73-5 Quotation (full acknowledgement): Stiftung Familienunternehmen (eds.): Family Businesses in Germany and the United States since Indus- trialisation – A Long-Term Historical Study, by Prof. Dr. Hartmut Berghoff and PD Dr. Ingo Köhler, Munich 2019, www.familienunternehmen.de II Contents Summary of main results ........................................................................................................V A. Introduction. Current observations and historical questions ..............................................1 B. Long-term trends. Structural and institutional change ...................................................13 C. Inheritance law and the preservation
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report
    First Quarter 2010 June 3, 2010 Interim Report Highlights • Sales up 1.0% to € 8.7 billion (up 3.4% at constant exchange rates) • Operating income up 3.3% to € 409 million • Net income up 45.7% to € 274 million • Underlying retail operating margin 4.9% Amsterdam, the Netherlands – Ahold today published its interim report for the first quarter 2010. CEO John Rishton said: “Our repositioning actions in recent years and our customer focus have enabled us to increase volumes and improve market share in the Netherlands and the United States and deliver another quarter of solid performance. The market continues to be challenging with customers focused on value and high levels of promotional activity. Despite these conditions, we remain confident in our ability to balance sales and margins and to continue providing value to our customers." Group performance Q1 Q1 % € million 2010 2009* Change Net sales 8,737 8,654 1.0% ** Operating income 409 396 3.3% Income from continuing operations 252 257 (1.9)% Net income 274 188 45.7% * Comparative figures reflect the retrospective amendments as disclosed in Note 2 to the interim financial statements. ** At constant exchange rates, net sales increased by 3.4%. First quarter 2010 (compared to first quarter 2009) Net sales were € 8.7 billion, up 1.0%, positively impacted by the business acquisitions in the quarter. At constant exchange rates, net sales increased by 3.4%. Operating income was € 409 million, up 3.3%. Retail operating income was € 429 million and retail operating margin was 4.9% compared to 4.8% in Q1 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Ahold Delhaize Annual Report 2016 01
    betterAnnual Reporttogether 2016 Ahold Delhaize Annual Report 2016 01 Introduction Welcome to our first Annual Report as a merged company, Ahold Delhaize. In 2016, we brought two successful businesses together to In 2016, we brought two create one of the world’s largest retail groups, able to deliver even more for the customers of our great local brands. This is reflected in the theme of our report: Better together. It is also successful businesses together the name of our strategy, which you will find out more about as you read our report. We believe that our long-term financial to create one of the world’s success is directly tied to how well we manage our financial, natural, and human resources. For that reason, we have decided to publish one report that provides an integrated view largest retail groups, able of our sustainability performance as part of our overall company performance. Please read on to find out more about our to deliver even more for year and the good momentum we achieved following the merger. Our report outlines the progress our great local brands made on all the customers of our great our strategic priorities, including making our fresh offering even fresher, providing healthier choices for our customers, reducing waste, supporting our communities, expanding our local brands. online offering, making it easier to shop, and much more. Ahold Delhaize Annual Report 2016 02 In this year’s report Overview Business review Governance Financials Investors 01 Introduction 20 Our Better Together strategy 73 Our Management Board
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in the Top Retail Trade in Romania
    Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development Vol. 19, Issue 1, 2019 PRINT ISSN 2284-7995, E-ISSN 2285-3952 TRENDS IN THE TOP RETAIL TRADE IN ROMANIA Agatha POPESCU University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Bucharest, 59 Marasti Boulevard, District 1, 011464, Bucharest Romania, Phone: +40213182564, Fax: +40213182888, Email: [email protected] Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract The paper analyzed the retail trade in Romania during the last decade, 2008-2017, pointing out the performance achieved by the top 10 retailers Kaufland, Carrefour, Lidl, Auchan, Mega Image, Profi, Metro, Selgros, Rewe and Cora Hypermarket, based on the number of stores, turnover, net profit, market share and average number of employees. Romanian market proved to be a good business environment for retailers as long as consumption is increasing determined by the growth of wages and reduction of VAT. Both hypermarkets, supermarkets, discount stores and minimarkets have appeared on Romania's map and their number continue to grow as expected in the near future. The number of square meters commercial space per inhabitant is enough high as long as Romanians like shopping. For this reason, the retailers have to develop new strategies to strengthen their business and cover much better consumers' needs. Important efforts should be made to develop the minimarket network in the smaller cities and even in the rural localities, the commercial space should be modernized and offer a pleasant and attractive environment for shopping, e-commerce should be extended as a modern purchasing alternative, the offer should be diversified including more Romanian products as preferred by consumers, organic products should be more visible on the shelves which have to offer healthy products to the clients, a more intensive advertising should be useful for a better information of the consumers and for increasing sales and profit of the retailers.
    [Show full text]
  • DE POOLSE RETAILSECTOR Voeding Publicatiedatum / 25.10.2018
    DE RETAILSECTOR IN POLEN FLANDERS INVESTMENT & TRADE MARKTSTUDIE Marktstudie /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// DE POOLSE RETAILSECTOR Voeding Publicatiedatum / 25.10.2018 //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Guido Scharpé Vlaams Economisch Vertegenwoordiger Flanders Investment & Trade - Warschau Ambasada Belgii Przedstawicielstwo Ekonomiczne i Handlowe Flandrii Al. Ujazdowskie 51 | 00-536 Warszaw | Poland T: +48 22 584 73 40 | E: [email protected] www.flandersinvestmentandtrade.com INHOUD 1. INLEIDING ................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Algemene achtergrondinformatie in verband met de Poolse retailmarkt 3 1.2 Demografische ontwikkeling en koopkracht 3 2. LEVENSMIDDELENHANDEL ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 TRENDS 6 2.1.1 Elektronische handel – e-commerce 6 2.1.2 Huismerken 6 2.1.3 Groeiend bewustzijn en stijgende verwachtingen van de consument 7 2.1.4 Gezondheid en wellness 7 2.1.5 Glutenvrije voeding 7 2.1.6 Convenience/Kant-en-klare maaltijden 8 3. DE BELANGRIJKSTE SPELERS IN POLEN ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 59B0dd6ec515e1504763246vxjwa.Pdf
    Better Together David Schalenbourg Director Building Projects, Format & Maintenance Our story, retail innovation for almost 150 years • Formed in July 2016 with the merger of Ahold and Delhaize Group, • 375,000 collaborators in 6,500 stores. • Number 1 online grocers Benelux/United States. • Top online retailer Benelux, • Our family of brands is made up of 21 great local brands serving over 50 million shoppers weekly in 11 countries across the world Active in Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Romania, Serbia and the United States. • We believe in delivering great food, value and innovation and are passionate about creating inclusive workplaces and strengthening local communities. ATMOsphere Asia / Bangkok / 6 September, 2017 Sustainable retailing Promoting healthier eating Reducing food waste Creating healthy and inclusive workplaces • The products we sell are safe, of high quality, affordable, and meet sustainable sourcing standards. • We play our part in tackling climate change, by keeping our carbon emissions down and reducing waste. • We take care of our people, by encouraging the development of associates and creating safe workplaces THE 1st AHOLD DELHAIZE SUSTAINABLE RETAILING REPORT (2016) WITH ACHIEVEMENTS 2016 AND TARGETS 2020. Link: https://www.aholddelhaize.com/en/sustainable-retailing/ ATMOsphere Asia / Bangkok / 6 September, 2017 Climate Impact Our approach • Reduction of our energy intensity and emissions, by assessing and reducing the environmental impact of our activities along our supply chain. • Our actions are aligned with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13 on combating climate change, and deliver on our promise to be a “better neighbor”. Our focus • Being more energy efficient in all our facilities, continue transition to natural refrigerants and lower GWP, control leakages, and transport improvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Powers of Retailing 2021 Contents
    Global Powers of Retailing 2021 Contents Top 250 quick statistics 4 Global economic outlook 5 Top 10 highlights 8 Impact of COVID-19 on leading global retailers 13 Global Powers of Retailing Top 250 17 Geographic analysis 25 Product sector analysis 32 New entrants 36 Fastest 50 38 Study methodology and data sources 43 Endnotes 47 Contacts 49 Acknowledgments 49 Welcome to the 24th edition of Global Powers of Retailing. The report identifies the 250 largest retailers around the world based on publicly available data for FY2019 (fiscal years ended through 30 June 2020), and analyzes their performance across geographies and product sectors. It also provides a global economic outlook, looks at the 50 fastest-growing retailers, and highlights new entrants to the Top 250. Top 250 quick statistics, FY2019 Minimum retail US$4.85 US$19.4 revenue required to be trillion billion among Top 250 Aggregate Average size US$4.0 retail revenue of Top 250 of Top 250 (retail revenue) billion 5-year retail Composite 4.4% revenue growth net profit margin 4.3% Composite (CAGR Composite year-over-year retail FY2014-2019) 3.1% return on assets revenue growth 5.0% Top 250 retailers with foreign 22.2% 11.1 operations Share of Top 250 Average number aggregate retail revenue of countries where 64.8% from foreign companies have operations retail operations Source: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. Global Powers of Retailing 2021. Analysis of financial performance and operations for fiscal years ended through 30 June 2020 using company annual reports, press releases, Supermarket News, Forbes America’s largest private companies and other sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Income and Wage Hot Spot Mapping Updated 23.04.19.Xlsx
    Top 10 Retailers in: Retailer Product Country Source Netherlands www.retail-index.com (By turnover) Ahold Coffee Kenya Ahold Delhaize Annual Report 2017, p.55 Jumbo Tropical fruit and vegetables Not specified Jumbo Annual Report 2013 Lidl N/A Sligro N/A Aldi Textiles Not specified ALDI Nord Maatschappelijk Jaarverslag 2015, p.41 Non-food range Not specified ALDI North Group Sustainability Report 2017, p.32 Kruidvat N/A Plus Shrimp Vietnam Plus - Oktober 2017 - Toelichting Ken de Keten-aanpak Bananas Not specified Plus - Mei 2018 - Risicoanalyse bananen Germany www.retail-index.com (By turnover) Edeka N/A Schwarz-Gruppe N/A Rewe N/A (Aldi) See Netherlands section Amazon N/A (Media Markt- Saturn) See Netherlands section DM- Drogeriemarkt N/A Otto.de N/A Lekkerland N/A Rossmann N/A UK www.retail-index.com (By turnover) Tesco Bananas Costa Rica, Ecuador Our approach to human rights in our supply chain (2017) Tea Malawi Contributing to the UN Sustainable Development Goals- 2018 Report Sainsbury Prawns Thailand, Belize Sainsburys Sustainability Standards, Prawns Key Raw Material Standard Tea Rwanda, Malawi, Kenya Sourcing for Sustainable Development 2018 Update Asda N/A Morrison Bananas Africa and Latin America Corporate Responsibility Report 2017/18 (Aldi) See Netherlands section The Co-operative Supplier Goods Not specified Sound Sourcing Code (December 2017) (Amazon) See Germany section Dixons Carphone N/A Boots N/A http://www.largestcompanies.com Waitrose N/A Sweden (By turnover in retail trade industry) H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB Textile
    [Show full text]