DOCSLIB.ORG

Steering Committee Meetings September 26, 2016 | October 3, 2016 Where We Are, Decisions and Next Steps

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Steering Committee Meetings September 26, 2016 | October 3, 2016 Where We Are, Decisions and Next Steps Powell-Division Transit and Development Project Steering Committee meetings September 26, 2016 | October 3, 2016 Where we are, decisions and next steps On June 1, 2016, the committee: y Discussed the public outreach and technical feasibility of an inner Division alignment y Reviewed the bus rapid transit (BRT) characteristics of this project y Discussed information desired to reach a decision On September 26 the committee will: y Discuss technical findings and community input for all remaining route decisions y Learn more detail about the Powell-Division Corridor-wide Strategy y Discuss upcoming timelines and process for LPA decision-making On October 3 the committee will: y Seek consensus on LPA recommendation for routing of the BRT Contents Page 2 Project goals and outcomes Page 3 Locally preferred alternative timeline Page 4 Corridor-wide Strategy Page 6 Route decisions: overview Page 8 How do we fund a quality project? Page 9 What will the project bring? Page 10 Recommendation: East terminus and route Page 12 Recommendation: Inner Portland Page 14 Recommendation: Willamette River crossing Page 15 Recommendation: Downtown Portland Page 16 Project timeline Powell-Division Transit and Development Project Steering Committee September 26 and October 3, 2016 Project goals and outcomes Why here, why now? The Powell-Division Transit and Development Project aims to create a better experience and quicker ride for the thousands of people who ride buses to get to school, go to work or go shopping. Improved bus rapid transit service on Division Street could be operating in 2021. • 10,000 daily riders • Investing in existing, currently ride Line popular service 4-Division • Faster, more • Too many buses are reliable service overcrowded, too • Greater ridership many riders passed capacity up at bus stops The Steering Committee adopted the following goals and outcomes on June 23, 2014. • Improved buses • Powell-Division is a and stations Project outcomes growing and diverse 1. Create a vision and development strategy for key places that promotes community driven corridor in our region • BRT is part of a comprehensive and supported economic development and identifies tools and strategies that mitigate • Regional High strategy to improve the impacts of market pressures that cause involuntary displacement. Capacity Transit Plan transit, safety priority 2. Identify a preferred near-term high capacity transit solution for the corridor that safely and community and efficiently serves high ridership demand, improves access to transit, is coordinated stabilization with related transportation investments, and recognizes limited capital and operational funding. The solution will include mode, alignment and station locations with supporting transportation improvements. Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) decision making and timeline Project goals The Steering Committee is charged with making a recommendation on the LPA for the y Transportation: People have safe and convenient transportation options − including transit project that determines the mode of transportation, the route and the station efficient and frequent high capacity transit service that enhances current local transit locations. The path forward involves the Steering Committee meeting 3-4 more times to service − that get them where they want to go and improves the existing system. make the remaining LPA decisions. y Well-being: Future development and transit improvements create safe, healthy neighborhoods and improve access to social, educational, environmental and economic Sept. 26, 2016 Oct. 3, 2016 Oct. 26, (Nov. 7 Winter 2016-2017 opportunities. Steering Committee: if needed) 2016 • Review Steering Committee: Steering Committee: Local jurisdictions y Equity: Future development and transit improvements reduce existing disparities, technical findings, • Select route • Select station adopt LPA benefit current residents and businesses and enhance our diverse neighborhoods. There community input locations is a commitment to prevent market-driven involuntary displacement of residents and on route choices businesses and to equitably distribute the benefits and burdens of change. y Efficiency: A high capacity transit project is efficiently implemented and operated. Ongoing design, technical analysis and community engagement: open houses, community meetings, one-on-one outreach with businesses, Continues with new residents and property owners Community Advisory Committee 2 POWELL-DIVISION TRANSIT AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT POWELL-DIVISION TRANSIT AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 3 Powell-Division Transit and Development Project Steering Committee September 26 and October 3, 2016 Beyond the LPA— Highlights: Division Street Highlights: Powell Boulevard Highlights from the Powell-Division Corridor-wide Strategy • Division BRT (Locally Preferred • Advance Powell Blvd. as a priority in Developing a more reliable, rapid bus system on Division Street that carries more passengers Alternative): More reliable service, regional High Capacity Transit Plan is one key component to achieving the goals of the Powell-Division Transit and Development greater capacity, station improvements. • Line 9: Improved frequency, faster project. And while a major transit improvement is important, the greater Powell-Division Also includes pedestrian crossings, ADA limited stop service and sidewalk improvements to access corridor needs more than a Division BRT to meet the range of needs and priorities of • Pedestrian crossings, ADA, sidewalk, transit stations communities throughout the area. While the Steering Committee is responsible for bus stop and safety improvements recommending the BRT Division Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA), their input has helped • Rapid flash beacons to make • 25 traffic signal upgrades shape the corridor-wide strategy. pedestrians more visible to motorists (Portland to Sandy) • Bike safety improvements The Powell-Division Corridor-wide Strategy represents the commitments of project partners • Outer Powell modernization (TriMet, City of Portland, City of Gresham, ODOT, Multnomah County and Metro) to actions that improve transit service, safety, walking and biking access, community development, and housing and business stability along Division Street, Powell Boulevard, and key North/South Highlights: Other Streets Highlights: Corridor-wide streets. Bus service improvements from • Catalyze live, work development near Detailed maps that describe improvements in the corridor will be available in late Service Enhancement Plans, including transit stations in Gresham: Focus on September. reallocation of redundant service hours: 182nd/Division, Eastman/Division, Gresham Transit Center, Stark and Kane • Potential frequency improvements on Powell-Division Corridor-wide Strategy lines 70, 73, 80, 81, 87 • Affordable housing development at 82nd/Division • Potential new lines on 148th, 162nd Steering Equitable Housing • Secure funding for new affordable Safety and Active • Potential Kane Dr bus stop Committee Transit Investment and Community housing units; preserve affordable responsibility: Transportation enhancements Define LPA Development housing units - mode, • Intersection safety along 82nd Ave. alignment and • Portland creating • Division: Safety station locations • Division BRT • Construct bikeway improvements Locally Preferred and stabilizing improvements, and enhanced crossings on 20s, 70s, Alternative affordable housing bicycle and 100s, 130s, 150s neighborhood pedestrian projects • Powell transit • Gresham greenways enhancements promoting homes • Powell: Safety and businesses improvements and • Other local near transit pedestrian projects transit service enhancements • Transit-oriented • Pedestrian projects development and bikeways on North/South Streets 4 POWELL-DIVISION TRANSIT AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT POWELL-DIVISION TRANSIT AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 5 Powell-Division Transit and Development Project Steering Committee September 26 and October 3, 2016 Route Overview Downtown Portland Inner Portland: Division Outer Division Route decisions remaining for the Portland Transit Mall (more promising) y BRT would be 15-20% faster y The Steering Committee Locally Preferred Alternative y Serves existing stations on Portland Transit Mall than 4-Division recommended an alignment along map more with many transit connections y Serves existing high ridership outer Division from 82nd Avenue to number information the Gresham Transit Center for further y Union Station area would be the likely terminus y Inner Division is less congested study on September 29, 2014 Downtown Portland p. 15 and provide connection to Amtrak than inner Powell y Analysis and design are context Columbia/Jefferson (less promising) y Minimal property impacts, fits Willamette crossing p. 14 sensitive and ongoing y Fewer connections within current street character Inner Portland p. 12 y Investments focused where y Numerous design constraints y More information on p. 12 improvements are most needed East Terminus p. 10 Willamette River crossing Powell Boulevard East Terminus Hawthorne Bridge y Not a feasible near-term Gresham TC terminus could work MHCC needs better transit y Faster to Pioneer Courthouse Square because it project y Connects to MAX Blue Line and 8 bus routes y Upgrading the Line 20 would travels more directly y Would not provide desired travel y Has park-and-ride and bike facilities provide strong connections to MHCC y Bridge lift delay during off-peak hours time or reliability without major Getting from Gresham TC to MHCC is difficult
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Joint Policy Advisory Committee On
    Date: December 1, 2020 To: Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation (JPACT) and interested parties From: Carrie MacLaren, Metro Attorney Michelle Bellia, Senior Attorney Margi Bradway, Planning & Development Deputy Director CC: Councilor Shirley Craddick, JPACT Chair Subject: JPACT Member and Alternate Appointment Process Purpose To provide guidance to cities and counties in the Portland Metro area about appointments to the Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation (JPACT) based on the JPACT bylaws, written and adopted by JPACT and the Metro Council in 1990 and amended in 2008. Background Metro is the federally mandated metropolitan planning organization (MPO) designated by the governor to develop an overall transportation plan and to program federal funds. Comprised of transportation representatives from across the region, JPACT recommends priorities and develops plans for the region. Before adopting transportation policies, the Metro Council must consider JPACT’s recommendations. Federal law, MAP-21, requires that MPOs representing areas with populations over 200,000 (known as Transportation Management Areas, or TMAs) have a decision-making structure that incorporates input from local elected officials, transit agencies, and appropriate state officials. Across the country, MPO boards vary in size. Federal regulations further define the role of the “policy advisory committee” in terms provide oversight and guidance to the MPO on transportation planning and funding. Metro’s Code and the JPACT Bylaws describe the makeup
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Adopted April 8Th, 2014 by Ordinance No
    CITY OF TROUTDALE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Adopted April 8th, 2014 by Ordinance no. 820 Prepared for: Prepared by: City of Troutdale Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 219 E Historic Columbia River Highway 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Troutdale, Oregon 97060 Portland, Oregon 97205 503.665.5175 503.228.5230 www.kittelson.com Transportation System Plan Troutdale Transportation System Plan Troutdale, Oregon Prepared For: City of Troutdale 219 E Historic Columbia River Highway Troutdale, Oregon 97060 (503) 665-5175 Prepared By: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Portland, OR 97205 (503) 228-5230 Project Manager: Matt Hughart, AICP Project Principal: Mark Vandehey, P.E. Project No. 12560.0 March 2014 Table of Contents Transportation System Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 1-1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 Goals and Policies ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Transportation Plans ................................................................................................................................................................ 1-3 Financing ...............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Transportation Plan for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities I Table of Contents June 2020
    Table of Contents June 2020 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 1-1 Development of the CTP .......................................................................................................... 1-3 Principles of the CTP ................................................................................................................ 1-5 Overview of relevant grant programs ..................................................................................... 1-7 TriMet Role as the Special Transportation Fund Agency ........................................................ 1-8 Other State Funding ................................................................................................................. 1-9 Coordination with Metro and Joint Policy Advisory Committee (JPACT) .............................. 1-11 2. Existing Transportation Services ...................................................................... 2-1 Regional Transit Service Providers .......................................................................................... 2-6 Community-Based Transit Providers ..................................................................................... 2-18 Statewide Transit Providers ................................................................................................... 2-26 3. Service Guidelines ........................................................................................... 3-1 History .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Outreach Summary P a G E | 1 August 2020 REFERENCE B
    REFERENCE B Outreach #1 Summary Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................................................1 Listening Sessions ........................................................................................................................................2 Online Survey................................................................................................................................................2 Key Findings..................................................................................................................................................3 Survey Questions and Summary ..................................................................................................................3 Demographics.............................................................................................................................................29 Appendix A..................................................................................................................................................39 Appendix B................................................................................................................................................136 Appendix C................................................................................................................................................139 Introduction The following report provides an overview of the results of the listening sessions and
    [Show full text]
  • Riders' Guide: English
    Rider’s Guide 503-416-3955 or toll-free 855-321-4899 ridetocare.com Table of Contents Contact information & office hours ................................ 1 Program overview ......................................................................2 Public transportation ...............................................................7 Mileage reimbursement .....................................................13 Vehicle-provided rides ........................................................ 16 Pharmacy stops ........................................................................28 Out of area ...................................................................................29 Emergencies ...............................................................................31 Driver screening ........................................................................31 Adverse weather plan ............................................................31 Your rights & responsibilities ..........................................32 Grievances, feedback & denials .....................................34 Member confidentiality .......................................................36 Language & format support..............................................36 Contact information & office hours Contact information Phone: 503-416-3955 Oregon Relay Service (TTY): 711 Toll-free at 855-321-4899 Office hours and holidays Office hours are 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. During those hours you can go through intake, file grievances and arrange your transportation
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX G 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Coordinated Transportation Plan for Seniors and People with Disabilities
    APPENDIX G 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Coordinated transportation plan for seniors and people with disabilities December 6, 2018 oregonmetro.gov/rtp Metro respects civil rights Metro fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that requires that no person be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin under any program or activity for which Metro receives federal financial assistance. Metro fully complies with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act that requires that no otherwise qualified individual with a disability be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination solely by reason of their disability under any program or activity for which Metro receives federal financial assistance. If any person believes they have been discriminated against regarding the receipt of benefits or services because of race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability, they have the right to file a complaint with Metro. For information on Metro’s civil rights program, or to obtain a discrimination complaint form, visit oregonmetro.gov/civilrights or call 503-797-1536. Metro provides services or accommodations upon request to persons with disabilities and people who need an interpreter at public meetings. If you need a sign language interpreter, communication aid or language assistance, call 503-797-1700 or TDD/TTY 503-797-1804 (8 a.m. to 5 p.m. weekdays) 5 business days before the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia River Gorge Transit Study Final Report
    [NAME OF DOCUMENT] | VOLUME [Client Name] Columbia River Gorge Transit Study Final Report May 2016 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i Columbia River Gorge Transit Study| Final Report Oregon Department of Transportation Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary .........................................................................................................1-1 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1-1 Key Findings From Existing Conditions and Market Analysis ........................................................ 1-2 Service Concept Development Process .............................................................................................. 1-4 Proposed Pilot Service Plan ................................................................................................................. 1-5 Near-Term Service Concepts ............................................................................................................... 1-5 Funding Strategy ................................................................................................................................... 1-6 Report Purpose & Organization ......................................................................................................... 1-6 2 Document/Plan Review ...................................................................................................2-1 Ongoing Planning Efforts ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Approval to Sign Intergovernmental Agreement for Transportation Growth Management (TGM) Grant Agreement No
    D A N J OHNSON December 19, 2019 Board of Commissioners Clackamas County Members of the Board: Approval to Sign Intergovernmental Agreement for Transportation Growth Management (TGM) Grant Agreement No. 33964 for the Clackamas County Transit Development Plan Purpose/ Execute the Intergovernmental Agreement for the Transportation Growth Outcomes Management (TGM) Grant Agreement No. 33964 to participate in the Clackamas County Transit Development Plan Dollar Amount The ODOT TGM program is directly contracting with the consultant for the and Fiscal TGM program award of $175,200. Staff time to assist in project completion Impact will be in-kind match of $23,891 Funding Source No cash match is required. The in-kind staff hours are funded through HB2017 Transit Funds. Duration December 2019 through June 18, 2021 Previous Board June 7th, 2018 provided an approval to apply and a Resolution of Action Support for the Transit Development Plan grant submittal September 20, 2018: Acceptance of TGM Grant Award for Clackamas County Transit Development Plan. County Counsel Reviewed and approved by County Counsel on December 10, 2019 Review Strategic Plan Build a strong infrastructure Alignment Grow a vibrant economy Contact Person Karen Buehrig, Long Range Planning Manager - 742-4683 The Department of Transportation and Development, Long Range Planning Program was awarded a Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) Grant to develop a Clackamas County Transit Development Plan. With six transit providers in Clackamas County (TriMet, South Metro Area Regional Transit (SMART), Canby Area Transit (CAT), South Clackamas Transportation District (SCTD), Sandy Area Metro (SAM), and the Mt. Hood Express administered by Clackamas County), a Transit Development Plan (TDP) is needed to provide strategic guidance for service improvements and integration between systems from a County perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Master Plan 2009
    Sandy Transit Master Plan City of Sandy, Oregon September 2009 Acknowledgements The City of Sandy acknowledges and appreciates the efforts of all those who participated in the development of the Transit Master Plan, especially the many residents, employees, and visitors who responded to the surveys and provided input at public meetings. Joint Citizen Advisory and Technical Advisory Committee Don Allen, Sandy City Council Representative, Transit Advisory Committee Member Tom Belanger, Oregon Trail School District Business Director Jackie Bollinger, Sandy Planning Commission Alternate Diane Brandon, Representative for People with Disabilities Teresa Christopherson, Clackamas County Sherrin Coleman, ODOT Public Transit Nancy Enabnit, City of Sandy, Senior Services Director Liz French, City of Sandy Engineer and TSP Project Lead Olga Gerberg, Sandy City Council Representative Eleanor Green, City of Sandy Transit Assistant Cindy Brown, Youth Representative Myrna Gonzales, Sandy Transit Driver Stew Hedges, Representative from First Student Christine Heycke, Consultant, CPH Planning, Inc. Sonya Kazen, ODOT Joyce LeDoux, Oregon Housing and Associated Services,Transit Operations Supervisor Hollis MacLean-Wenzel, Sandy Chamber of Commerce Tom Mills, TriMet Daniel Rathman, Transit Driver, Dispatcher Julie Stephens, City of Sandy Transit Manager Caren Topliff, Sandy Transit Advisory Committee Bill Wardy, Sandy Transit Advisory Committee City Council Linda Malone, Mayor Jeremy Pietzold Lois Coleman Dave Beitler Phil Moyer Don Allen Olga Gerberg Planning
    [Show full text]
  • Shuttle Service Access Plan
    Conexion Studio - June 2020 Clackamas Community College SHUTTLE SERVICE and ACCESS PLAN Table of contents Executive Summary ............................................................................ 1 1. Introduction ...................................................................................... 9 2. Context ................................................................................................ 17 3. Barriers ................................................................................................ 49 4. Recommendations ......................................................................... 65 5. Evaluation and Future Planning ............................................... 99 Appendix A. Travel Time Methodology ...................................... 117 Appendix B. Student Engagement Methodology .................. 119 Appendix C. Performance Measures ........................................... 124 CONE ION STUDIO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTEXT Today, transportation barriers are common among Clackamas Commu- nity College (CCC) students. CCC’s Spring 2019 student transportation survey found that close to 40% of students have been late or missed a class due to transportation issues. Given the history of auto-centric, piecemeal development in Clackamas County, providing an efficient and robust transit system is difficult, which means students with limited or no access to personal vehicles face compounded difficulties in accessing education at CCC. Making education more accessible is part of CCC’s mission, and overcoming
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment A
    ATTACHMENT A Agency State 128 Business Council MA 9 Town Transit CT AAATA MI Aberdeen Ride Line SD ABQ RIDE NM AC Transit CA Access Services CA Addison County Transit Resources VT Advance Transit VT Airport (MAC) MN Airport Valet Express CA Alachua County Regional Transit System FL Albany Transit System GA Albany Transit System OR Alexandria Transit Company (DASH) VA Alhambra Community Transit CA Allegany County Transit MD Allen County Regional Transit Authority OH Altamont Commuter Express CA Amador Transit CA Amarillo City Transit TX Amtrak AMTRAN PA Anaheim Resort Transportation CA Anchorage People Mover AK Annapolis Transit MD Annett Bus Lines Anoka County MN Antelope Valley Transit Authority CA Arcata & Mad River Transit System CA Area Transportation Authority of North Central PA PA Areawide Community Transportation System (ACTS) AL Arlington Transit VA Asheville Redefines Transit NC Ashland Bus System KY Atascadero Transit / North County Shuttle CA Athens Public Transit OH Athens Transit GA Atlanta Streetcar GA Atlantic Station Shuttle GA Atomic City Transit NM Auburn Transit (Placer County Department of Public Works) CA Augusta Public Transit GA Avila Trolley CA Baker City Community Connection OR Banning Transit CA Barstow Area Transit CA Bart Bus WI Basin Transit Service OR Battle Creek Transit MI Bay Area Rapid Transit CA Bay Area Transportation Authority MI Bay Metro MI Bay State Cruise Company MA Bay Town Trolley FL Baylink CA BCTA (Beaver County Transit Authority) PA BE Line CA Beach Cities Transit - City of Redondo Beach (BCT)
    [Show full text]