DOCSLIB.ORG

Sub-National Consumption Statistics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sub-National Consumption Statistics Sub-national consumption statistics Methodology and guidance booklet December 2013 © Crown copyright 2013 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected]. This document is also available from our website at www.gov.uk/decc. 2 Methodology and guidance booklet Statistician Responsible: Mary Gregory Prepared by: Sabena Khan Sam Stadnyk Sub-national consumption statistics [email protected] 0300 068 5037 3 Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Summary of datasets .............................................................................................. 8 1.2 Statistical Geographies ......................................................................................... 11 1.3 Users and uses of the data ................................................................................... 12 1.4 Revisions policy .................................................................................................... 13 2 Gas consumption statistics .............................................................................................. 14 2.1 Overview (2005 – 2012 datasets) ......................................................................... 14 2.1.1 Coverage .................................................................................................. 14 2.1.2 Sectors ..................................................................................................... 15 2.1.3 Data suppliers .......................................................................................... 15 2.2 Methodology ......................................................................................................... 16 2.3 Comparability ........................................................................................................ 17 2.3.1 Comparison to sub-national electricity data .............................................. 17 2.3.2 Comparison to other DECC publications .................................................. 18 2.4 Pre-2005 datasets ................................................................................................. 18 2.5 Data below local authority level (MSOA/IGZ and LSOA) ...................................... 19 2.6 Further information ................................................................................................ 20 3 Electricity consumption statistics ..................................................................................... 21 3.1 Overview (2005 – 2011 datasets) ......................................................................... 21 3.1.1 Coverage of data ...................................................................................... 21 3.1.2 Sectors ..................................................................................................... 22 3.1.3 Data limitations ......................................................................................... 22 3.2 Methodology ......................................................................................................... 23 3.3 Comparability ........................................................................................................ 25 3.3.1 Comparison to sub-national electricity data .............................................. 25 3.3.2 Comparison to DUKES and ECUK ........................................................... 26 3.4 Pre-2005 datasets ................................................................................................. 26 3.5 Sub-regional level data (MSOA/IGZ and LSOA) ................................................... 28 4 3.6 Further information ................................................................................................ 28 4 Sub-regional gas and electricity consumption statistics (MSOA/IGZ and LSOA) ............ 29 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 29 4.1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................... 29 4.1.2 Statistical geographies ............................................................................. 30 4.2 Main data features (2011 data) ............................................................................. 30 4.2.1 Overview .................................................................................................. 30 4.2.2 MSOA/IGZ and LSOA .............................................................................. 31 4.2.3 Unallocated consumption ......................................................................... 31 4.2.4 Merged consumption ................................................................................ 31 4.2.5 Socio-economic data ................................................................................ 32 4.3 Data limitations ..................................................................................................... 32 4.4 History of the data collection process ................................................................... 32 4.5 Previous datasets ................................................................................................. 33 4.5.1 2008 – 2009 data (MSOA/IGZ and LSOA) ............................................... 33 4.5.2 2005 – 2007 data (MSOA/IGZ only) ......................................................... 33 4.5.3 2004 data – MSOA electricity only ........................................................... 35 4.5.4 Limitations ................................................................................................ 36 5 Northern Ireland domestic electricity consumption statistics ........................................... 37 5.1 Overview (2008 – 2011 data) ................................................................................ 37 5.2 Background and methodology .............................................................................. 38 5.3 Comparison to Great Britain electricity consumption data .................................... 38 6 Northern Ireland non-domestic electricity consumption statistics .................................... 39 6.1 Overview (2009 – 2011 data) ................................................................................ 39 6.1.1 Coverage of data ...................................................................................... 39 6.1.2 Data limitations ......................................................................................... 40 6.2 Background and methodology .............................................................................. 40 6.3 Comparability to Great Britain electricity consumption data .................................. 40 7 Road transport fuel consumption statistics ...................................................................... 41 7.1 Overview (2005 – 2011 data) ................................................................................ 41 7.1.1 Coverage of data ...................................................................................... 41 7.1.2 Data limitations ......................................................................................... 42 7.2 Methodology ......................................................................................................... 42 7.3 Comparison to DUKES and ECUK ....................................................................... 43 5 7.4 Methodological changes impacting data comparability over time ......................... 44 8 Residual fuel consumption statistics ................................................................................ 46 8.1 Overview (2005 – 2011 data) ................................................................................ 46 8.2 Methodology ......................................................................................................... 47 8.3 Comparison to DUKES and ECUK ....................................................................... 48 8.4 Key methodological changes over time ................................................................ 49 8.5 Further information ................................................................................................ 50 9 Total final energy consumption statistics ......................................................................... 51 9.1 Overview (2005 – 2011 data) ................................................................................ 51 9.2 Methodology ......................................................................................................... 52 9.3 Data limitations and interpretation......................................................................... 55 9.4 Data accuracy ....................................................................................................... 56 9.5 Further information ................................................................................................ 56 Annexes ................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Preface and Introduction
    Marine Aggregate Extraction: Approaching Good Practice in Environmental Impact Assessment 1 PREFACE AND INTRODUCTION This publication and references within it to any methodology, process, service, manufacturer, or company do not constitute its endorsement or recommendation by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister or the Minerals Industry Research Organisation. Gravel image reproduced courtesy of BMAPA Hamon grab © MESL-Photo Library Boomer system © Posford Haskoning Wrasse image reproduced courtesy of Keith Hiscock (MarLIN) Aerial Plume courtesy of HR Wallingford Coastline © Posford Haskoning Fishing vessels © Posford Haskoning Dredger image courtesy of BMAPA Beam trawl © MESL-Photo Library ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Posford Haskoning project team would like to thank the following members of the Expert Panel, established for this project, for all their invaluable advice and comments: Dr Alan Brampton (HR Wallingford Ltd) Dr Tony Firth (Wessex Archaeology) Professor Richard Newell Ali McDonald (Anatec UK Ltd) (Marine Ecological Surveys Ltd) Dr Tony Seymour (Fisheries Consultant) Dr Ian Selby (Hanson Aggregates Marine Ltd) In addition to this expert panel, key sections of the report were contributed by the following, to whom thanks are again extended: • Dr Peter Henderson (Pisces Conservation Ltd) • Dr Paul Somerfield (Plymouth Marine Laboratory) • Dr Jeremy Spearman (HR Wallingford Ltd) The project has also benefited considerably from an initial review by the following organisations. The time and assistance of these reviewers was greatly appreciated:
    [Show full text]
  • National Statistics Postcode Lookup User Guide
    National Statistics Postcode Lookup User Guide Edition: May 2018 Editor: ONS Geography Office for National Statistics May 2018 NSPL User Guide May 2018 A National Statistics Publication Copyright and Reproduction National Statistics are produced to high professional standards Please refer to the 'Postcode products' section on our Licences set out in the Code of Practice for Official Statistics. They are page for the terms applicable to these products. produced free from political influence. TRADEMARKS About Us Gridlink is a registered trademark of the Gridlink Consortium Office for National Statistics and may not be used without the written consent of the Gridlink The Office for National Statistics (ONS) is the executive office of Programme Board. the UK Statistics Authority, a non-ministerial department which The Gridlink logo is a registered trademark. reports directly to Parliament. ONS is the UK government’s single largest statistical producer. It compiles information about OS AddressBase is a registered trademark of Ordnance the UK’s society and economy, and provides the evidence-base Survey (OS), the national mapping agency of Great Britain. for policy and decision-making, the allocation of resources, and Boundary-Line is a trademark of OS, the national mapping public accountability. The Directors General of ONS report agency of Great Britain. directly to the National Statistician who is the Authority's Chief Executive and the Head of the Government Statistical Service. Pointer is a registered trademark of Land and Property Services, an Executive Agency of the Department of Finance and Personnel Government Statistical Service (Northern Ireland). The Government Statistical Service (GSS) is a network of professional statisticians and their staff operating both within the ONS and across more than 30 other government departments and agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • INCOME TAX in COMMON LAW JURISDICTIONS: from the Origins
    This page intentionally left blank INCOME TAX IN COMMON LAW JURISDICTIONS Many common law countries inherited British income tax rules. Whether the inheritance was direct or indirect, the rationale and origins of some of the central rules seem almost lost in history. Commonly, they are simply explained as being of British origin without further explanation, but even in Britain the origins of some of these rules are less than clear. This book traces the roots of the income tax and its precursors in Britain and in its former colonies to 1820. Harris focuses on four issues that are central to common law income taxes and which are of particular current relevance: the capitalÀrevenue distinction, the taxation of corporations, taxation on both a source and residence basis, and the schedular approach to taxation. He uses an historical per- spective to make observations about the future direction of income tax in the modern world. Volume II will cover the period 1820 to 2000. PETER HARRIS is a solicitor whose primary interest is in tax law. He is also a Senior Lecturer at the Faculty of Law of the University of Cambridge, Deputy Director of the Faculty’s Centre for Tax Law, and a Tutor, Director of Studies and Fellow at Churchill College. CAMBRIDGE TAX LAW SERIES Tax law is a growing area of interest, as it is included as a subdivision in many areas of study and is a key consideration in business needs throughout the world. Books in this Series will expose the theoretical underpinning behind the law to shed light on the taxation systems, so that the questions to be asked when addressing an issue become clear.
    [Show full text]
  • Celtic Sea Case Study Governance Analysis Finding Sanctuary and England’S Marine Conservation Zone Process
    MESMA Work Package 6 Celtic Sea Case Study Governance Analysis Finding Sanctuary and England’s Marine Conservation Zone process Louise M. Lieberknecht Wanfei Qiu, Peter J. S. Jones Department of Geography, University College London Report published in January 2013 Table of Contents Cover Note ..........................................................................................................................................7 About the main author (statement of positionality) ......................................................................7 Acknowledgements.........................................................................................................................8 About the references in this report ................................................................................................8 1. Context............................................................................................................................................9 1.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................9 1.1.1 Introduction to the case study...........................................................................................9 1.1.2 History of Finding Sanctuary..............................................................................................9 1.1.3 The Finding Sanctuary region...........................................................................................12 1.1.4 Finding Sanctuary within the context of
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Outdoor Assembly Sites in Early Medieval England John Baker1, Stuart Brookes2 1The University of Nottingham, Notting
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository@Nottingham Identifying outdoor assembly sites in early medieval England John Baker1, Stuart Brookes2 1The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 2University College London, London, United Kingdom Correspondence to: Stuart Brookes, UCL Institute of Archaeology, 31–34 Gordon Square, London, WC1H 0PY, United Kingdom. Email: [email protected] 1 Venues of outdoor assembly are an important type of archaeological site. Using the example of early medieval (Anglo-Saxon; 5th–11th centuries A.D.) meeting places in England we describe a new multidisciplinary method for identifying and characterizing such sites. This method employs place name studies, field survey, and phenomenological approaches such as viewshed, sound- mark, and landscape character recording. While each site may comprise a unique combination of landscape features, it is argued that by applying criteria of accessibility, distinctiveness, functionality, and location, important patterns in the characteristics of outdoor assembly places emerge. Our observations relating to Anglo-Saxon meeting places have relevance to other ephemeral sites. Archaeological fieldwork can benefit greatly by a rigorous application of evidence from place name studies and folklore/oral history to the question of outdoor assembly sites. Also, phenomenological approaches are an important in assessing the choice of assembly places by past peoples. Keywords: early medieval England, hundreds, assembly places, place names, temporary sites, judicial governance, phenomenology 2 Introduction Temporary, popular gatherings in outdoor settings are common in societies of the past and present. Fairs, political rallies, festivals, sporting events, camps, theater, and battles are frequent events, but most leave few physical traces for archaeologists to recover.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Identifiers in Understanding Society Version 1 Birgitta Rabe Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex
    Understanding Society Working Paper Series No. 2011 – 01 March 2011 Updated November 2011 Geographical identifiers in Understanding Society Version 1 Birgitta Rabe Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex Geographical identifiers in Understanding Society Version 1 Birgitta Rabe Non-Technical Summary Understanding Society opens a range of new opportunities for local area research. These arise because geographical identifiers are being made available at different geographical levels which enable researchers to merge a wealth of data on area characteristics to individual’s responses. Many of these are freely available for download from the internet. This paper provides a brief introduction to UK geography, gives an overview of the geo-codes available for use with Understanding Society and provides documentation of the available variables. Geographical identifiers in Understanding Society Version 1 Birgitta Rabe Abstract A range of geographical identifiers are being made available for Understanding Society which allow researchers to merge external data at different geographical levels to individual’s responses. Examples of geographical identifiers at higher level include country and Government Office Region; at medium level Local Authority Districts and Travel to Work Areas; at lower level Lower Layer Super Output Areas. This paper provides a brief introduction to UK geography, gives an overview of the geo-codes available for use with Understanding Society and provides documentation of the variables. Keywords: Geographical identifiers; Data linkage; Understanding Society JEL Classifications: C81, Y20 Contact: [email protected] Acknowledgements: The work reported in this paper is part of the Understanding Society programme, funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah L. Mitchell Dphil the University of York
    A POST-CONQUEST ENGLISH RETROSPECT UPON THE AGE OF THE ANGLO-SAXONS: A STUDY OF THE EARLY-MIDDLE-ENGLISH VERSE CHRONICLE ATTRIBUTED TO ROBERT OF GLOUCESTER SARAH L. MITCHELL DPHIL THE UNIVERSITY OF YORK DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH AND RELATED LITERATURE OCTOBER 1997 ABSTRACT This study seeks to re-evaluate the thirteenth-century metrical chronicle attributed to Robert of Gloucester. In particular, it examines the nature of the chronicler's Englishness, assessing his retrospect upon the age of the Anglo-Saxons in order to ascertain how the historical record he creates is influenced by the events of this period. The focus is also upon the chronicle as a literary text. By both of these approaches, this thesis contributes to a wider understanding of the chronicler's motivations and identification. Chapter one explores the concepts of nation and nationhood which are set up in the chronicle. Other studies on national identity are considered, and close textual analysis assesses the national distinctions which are drawn in the chronicle. The use of the English vernacular for the text is considered as a criterion in Robert's construction of an English community. Chapter two addresses how Robert's pro-English stance affects the historical priorities which he makes in the text. The way in which different historical periods are handled, and the manner in which Robert manufactures continuities between the Anglo-Saxon era and his own time are studied. Chapter three stresses the literary aspects of the text. Close textual analysis explores the intended dissemination method for the text. The literary techniques which Robert implements are also given detailed consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • DVC-England Report
    Research Report 111111/11 ///3333 Monitoring reported dddeerdeer road casualties and related accidents in EngEnglandland to 2010 December 2011 J Langbein December 202011111111 Monitoring reported deer road casualties and related accidents in England to 2010 Report to The Highways Agency Prepared by Jochen Langbein Deer Initiative Research Report 2011/3 December 2011 Copyright © The Deer Initiative Limited 2011 Further information can be obtained from: The Deer Initiative The Carriage House Brynkinalt Business Centre Chirk Wrexham LL14 5NS www.thedeerinitiative.co.uk Or email: [email protected] Monitoring reported deer road casualties and related accidents in England to 2010 Key Messages 1. Our core data sources show a persistent increase in deer vehicle collisions (DVCs) from 2001 until 2007 and have begun to level off since (Fig. C-1). There is no obvious single reason for this identifiable from the data, but the coincident slight decline in national road traffic volumes since 2007 may have contributed to that trend. Distribution of DVCs across England is very uneven, with South East and East of England region together accounting for over 65% of DVCs per year across all road types, as well as over 50% of those recorded on the strategic trunk road network (Fig. M-6). 2. Localised districts where some of the clearest DVC reductions have occurred include a number of areas where increased landscape level deer management and awareness campaigns have been undertaken by the Deer Initiative (in particular at Dinmore Forest in Herefordshire and Ashridge Forest in the Chilterns). 3. Within the trunk road network the highest number of DVCs recorded since 2007 include several sections of the M3 and M27 in Hampshire, A12-M25 links, M40 east of Oxford, and M11 and A12-M25 in Essex (see overview Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Studies Through Language: English-Speaking World (Лінгвокраїнозавство Країн Основної Іноземної Мови) Англ
    НАЦІОНАЛЬНИЙ УНІВЕРСИТЕТ БІОРЕСУРСІВ І ПРИРОДОКОРИСТУВАННЯ УКРАЇНИ Кафедра романо-германських мов і перекладу Country Studies through Language: English-Speaking World (Лінгвокраїнозавство країн основної іноземної мови) англ. для студентів ОС «Бакалавр» галузі знань 03 «Гуманітарні науки» зі спеціальності 035 «Філологія» КИЇВ - 2016 УДК 811.111(075.8) ББК 81.432.1я73 Б12 Рекомендовано до друку вченою радою Національного університету біоресурсів і природокористування України (протокол № 5 від “23 ”листопада 2016р.) Рецензенти: Амеліна С. М. − доктор педагогічних наук, професор, завідувач кафедри іноземної філології і перекладу Національного університету біоресурсів і природокористування України Юденко О. І. − кандидат філологічних наук, доцент, завідувач кафедри іноземних мов Нацiональної академiї образотворчого мистецтва і архiтектури Галинська О.М. − кандидат філологічних наук, доцент кафедри ділової іноземної мови та міжнародної комунікації Національного університету харчових технологій Бабенко Олена Country Studies through Language: English-Speaking World /Лінгвокраїнозавство країн основної іноземної мови (англ.) Навчальний посібник для студентів ОС «Бакалавр» галузі знань 03 «Гуманітарні науки» зі спеціальності 035 «Філологія» : Вид-но НУБіП України, 2016. –324 с. Навчальний посібник з дисципліни «Лінгвокраїнозавство країн основної іноземної мови» спрямовано на вдосконалення практичної підготовки майбутніх фахівців з іноземної мови (учителів англійської мови, перекладачів-референтів) шляхом розширення їхнього словникового запасу в
    [Show full text]
  • Package 'Postcodesior'
    Package ‘PostcodesioR’ January 7, 2021 Type Package Title API Wrapper Around 'Postcodes.io' Version 0.3.0 Maintainer Eryk Walczak <[email protected]> Description Free UK geocoding using data from Office for National Statistics. It is using several functions to get information about post codes, outward codes, reverse geocoding, nearest post codes/outward codes, validation, or randomly generate a post code. API wrapper around <https://postcodes.io>. License GPL-3 URL https://docs.ropensci.org/PostcodesioR/ LazyData TRUE Depends R (>= 3.1) Imports httr RoxygenNote 7.1.1 Suggests knitr, dplyr, rmarkdown, testthat, covr, purrr VignetteBuilder knitr BugReports https://github.com/ropensci/PostcodesioR/issues NeedsCompilation no Author Eryk Walczak [aut, cre] (<https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8724-462X>), Claudia Vitolo [rev] (<https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-1176>), Robin Lovelace [rev] (<https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5679-6536>) Repository CRAN Date/Publication 2021-01-07 22:40:02 UTC R topics documented: bulk_postcode_lookup . .2 bulk_reverse_geocoding . .3 nearest_outcode . .4 1 2 bulk_postcode_lookup nearest_outcode_lonlat . .5 nearest_postcode . .5 outcode_reverse_geocoding . .6 outward_code_lookup . .7 place_lookup . .8 place_query . .9 postcode_autocomplete . 10 postcode_lookup . 11 postcode_query . 13 postcode_validation . 14 random_place . 14 random_postcode . 15 reverse_geocoding . 16 scottish_postcode_lookup . 17 terminated_postcode . 17 Index 19 bulk_postcode_lookup Bulk postcode lookup Description Returns a list of matching postcodes and respective available data. Usage bulk_postcode_lookup(postcodes) Arguments postcodes Accepts a list of postcodes. Accepts up to 100 postcodes. For only one postcode use postcode_lookup. Value A list. See Also postcode_lookup for documentation. Examples pc_list <- list( postcodes = c("PR3 0SG", "M45 6GN", "EX165BL")) # spaces are ignored bulk_postcode_lookup(pc_list) bulk_reverse_geocoding 3 bulk_reverse_geocoding Bulk reverse geocoding Description Returns nearest postcodes for a given longitude and latitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a World-Class Bus System for Britain
    Building a world-class bus system for Britain Ian Taylor and Lynn Sloman TfQL Community Interest Company Final Report May 2016 About TfQL Community Interest Company This report was researched and written by Ian Taylor and Lynn Sloman, founding directors of TfQL Community Interest Company. TfQL Community Interest Company was established as the not-for-profit sister company to Transport for Quality of Life Limited, to enable the skills and experience within Transport for Quality of Life to be deployed on projects of social benefit within a not-for-profit social enterprise structure. Its work aims to promote a transport system that is more socially and environmentally beneficial, through research, policy development and dissemination of good practice. Web: www.transportforqualityoflife.com Email: [email protected] Telephone: 01654 781358 Incorporated in the UK, Company Number: 7715481 Credits and disclaimers Cover image credits (left to right): Chris Parker www.parkerphotography.co.uk; Unite The views expressed in the report are those of the authors and should not be taken to represent official policy of the organisations that have funded this research. Final report reissued May 2016. © Copyright TfQL Community Interest Company. All rights reserved. Note on terminology The term ‘franchising’ is used broadly in this report, to cover all systems where bus operations are regulated and competitively tendered, including: ‘net’ contracts in which the bus operator retains the fare revenue; ‘gross’ contracts (‘concessions’ by other terminologies) in which the franchising authority retains the fare revenue; contracts let under a ‘Quality Contract Scheme’; contracts let under a system like that operating in London; or contracts competitively let under any other arrangement.
    [Show full text]
  • Essays on Social Policy in Victorian England
    ESSAYS ON SOCIAL POLICY IN VICTORIAN ENGLAND A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Maxwell Dryjer Kiniria August 2019 © 2019 Maxwell Dryjer Kiniria ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ESSAYS ON SOCIAL POLICY IN VICTORIAN ENGLAND Maxwell Dryjer Kiniria, Ph.D. Cornell University 2019 On the day she died—January 22nd, 1901—Victoria was Britain’s longest reign- ing monarch. Britain (and the world) had been transformed during her reign. It had elected ten prime ministers, including Russell, Palmerston, and Disraeli twice; Derby and Salisbury thrice; and Gladstone four times. The United States had elected eighteen presidents. Van Buren was inaugurated only 481 days be- fore her coronation. McKinley was shot only 227 days after her death. Between 1837 and 1901, Britain’s population had more than doubled. Where in 1837 there was little but arable- or pasture-land, in 1901 there were cities, roads, railroads, new industries, and new forms of local government. This transformation, how- ever salutary, was profoundly disruptive. There was immigration into Britain. There was immigration within Britain. Infrastructure was built. Vaccinations were discovered. The business cycle displaced meteorology as the most impor- tant source of economic uncertainty. In the following three essays, I explore three reactions to these sundry disruptions. In the first essay, I explore the Public Health Act of 1848—England’s first at- tempt at systematic sanitation reform—and, in so doing, I provide quantitative evidence of the effect of public health interventions on mortality in a decidedly developing country.
    [Show full text]