DOCSLIB.ORG

Marvin A. Sweeney, King Josiah of Judah: the Lost Messiah of Israel Steven W

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marvin A. Sweeney, King Josiah of Judah: the Lost Messiah of Israel Steven W James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Libraries Libraries & Educational Technologies 2007 Marvin A. Sweeney, King Josiah of Judah: the Lost Messiah of Israel Steven W. Holloway James Madison University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.lib.jmu.edu/letfspubs Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Holloway, Steven W., "Marvin A. Sweeney, King Josiah of Judah: the Lost Messiah of Israel" (2007). Libraries. 119. http://commons.lib.jmu.edu/letfspubs/119 This Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries & Educational Technologies at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Libraries by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Review Reviewed Work(s): King Josiah of Judah: The Lost Messiah of Israel by Marvin A. Sweeney Review by: Steven W. Holloway Source: Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 66, No. 4 (October 2007), pp. 304-306 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/524166 Accessed: 05-01-2018 18:33 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Near Eastern Studies This content downloaded from 134.126.76.227 on Fri, 05 Jan 2018 18:33:23 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 304 Journal of Near Eastern Studies Vol. 66 No. 4 currency both as an important synthetic study accurately summarizes the historical and exe- and—because it incorporates the most recent bib- getical issues, as the author construes them, and liography on secondary literature and archaeo- then lays out the program of the book and its logical and epigraphic discoveries—as something global conclusions. of a reference on those developments. Prospective readers of King Josiah of Judah who might hungrily suppose that they are get- Joel S. Burnett ting a monograph-length historical study in the format of the Cambridge Ancient History series Baylor University Waco, Texas are doomed to famine. Sweeney’s work comprises a closely argued redaction-critical study of the Deuteronomistic History and several prophetic texts, written largely in dialogue with leading rep- King Josiah of Judah: The Lost Messiah of resentatives of the East Coast “American school” Israel. By Marvin A. Sweeney. Oxford: who share his assumptions concerning the his- Oxford University Press, 2001. Pp. xvi + torical reliability of the Hebrew Scriptures, and 350. $60. the conviction that redaction-critical methods Sweeney’s volume joins the deluge of mono- yield historically transparent insights analogous graphs and periodical articles devoted in the to the stratigraphic reconstruction of a scien- past 40 years or so to Josiah of Judah, a biblical tifically controlled archaeological excavation. monarch who played a distinctly minor role in Sweeney gets off to a promising start in his in- Jewish and Christian biblical exegesis before the troduction. After giving us a synopsis of the old work of Julius Wellhausen and the nineteenth- chestnut that lammelek jar handles and an ostracon century biblical archaeology movement thrust this prove that the historical Josiah succeeded in re- king into the limelight. The methodological intent establishing the boundaries of the Davidic Empire and structure of the book is gratifyingly clear: before his untimely death at the hands of Pharaoh, by combining archaeological evidence for the Sweeney deftly disposes of this “evidence” and “age of Josiah” together with a minute redaction- other supposed indices of Josianic territorial ex- critical analysis of the so-called Deuteronomistic pansion, drawing the creditable conclusion that, History, Deuteronomy, Jeremiah, Isaiah, Nahum, “If any reform program took place at all, it must Hosea, Amos, Zephaniah, and Habakkuk, and by have been very limited in scope and in success” subjecting the biblical texts to a rhetorical close (p. 7). reading, the figure of Josiah and his religio- Following this auspicious beginning, however, political aspirations may be extricated, more or we are returned to a familiar world in which less reliably, from the matrix of the past. This Josiah ex hypothesi attempted to restore “the full Sweeney does in two parts, “The Deuterono- neo-Davidic empire” (p. 7), and “scholars accept mistic History” (pp. 21–177) and “Prophetic Lit- the historical reality of Josiah’s reign and reform erature and Josiah’s Reign” (pp. 179–313), with program as presented in the DtrH [Deuteronomic a final conclusion chapter (pp. 315–23). In the History]” (p. 5 and passim). While Sweeney does former, the author works outwards, as it were, evince some awareness of the troubling historical from the central narratives of the reign, beginning enigmas of this king, the harder questions go with the conclusion of 2 Kings and the story of unasked and unanswered. Examples: Sweeney Josiah, then progressing backwards in time believes that Josiah pursued a pro-Babylonian, through the reigns of Manasseh, Hezekiah, the anti-Assyrian foreign policy like that of his great- Northern Kingdom (1 Kings 12–2 Kings 17), grandfather Hezekiah, a notion largely based on Solomon, David, Saul, Judges, Joshua, and the assumption that a “power vacuum” prevailed Deuteronomy. In part 2, Sweeney weighs the in the Southern Levant following the implosion evidence for a Josianic redaction in the afore- of the Neo-Assyrian Empire at the death of mentioned prophetic books. Both sections con- Assurbanipal, a vacuum that the ambitious Judah- clude with extremely clear summaries, just as ite king sought to fill. There is no evidence for the volume begins with a lucid introduction that such a vacuum, pro or con; it is entirely possible This content downloaded from 134.126.76.227 on Fri, 05 Jan 2018 18:33:23 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms October 2007 Book Reviews 305 that the Assyrians in their decline passed the YHWH’s central sanctuary and the house of administrative authority over these territories to David as YHWH’s designated dynasty” (p. 10). the rulers of the Twenty-sixth Dynasty, in which To be sure, Sweeney is his own man and departs case Josiah was a nominal Assyrian and de from the interpretations of Cross at a number of facto Egyptian vassal for his entire reign. Pace points, for instance, in his assessment of the sig- Sweeney, the political implications of the de- nificance of Jeroboam I for the Josianic edition cline of Assyria at Assurbanipal’s death, while (pp. 86–92). In keeping with earlier studies by clear for us today in historical hindsight, were other scholars, he finds evidence of extensive probably fraught with uncertainty for the court Josianic redactional activity in various prophetic of Josiah together with most of Western Asia texts. The criteria used to identify the redactional (pp. 254–55). And the biblical Josiah is credited hands are, to say the least, broad: cult central- with destroying a variety of divine images, ization; a desire to restore a Davidic dynasty; re- slaughtering priests, and decommissioning cultic unification of the divided houses of Israel and installations. By comparison, the Sargonid kings Judah; exile and its aftermath; joint references of Assyria never claimed in their royal inscrip- to Assyria, Egypt, and/or Cush; and negative tions to have slain priests, and it was only in evaluations of Judahite kings that imply a positive the instance of the epic destruction of national evaluation of Josiah. The temptation to indulge temples—the Urartian temple of Haldi by in circular argumentation or fractured syllogismic Sargon, the temples of Babylon by Sennacherib, logic (the book of Nahum deals triumphantly and the temples of Susa by Assurbanipal—that with the fall of Nineveh and the deliverance of the Assyrian kings dared to boast of temple and Judah; Josiah’s reign encompassed the period of cult-image demolition, deeds that in fact must the decline of Assyria and was concerned with have happened regularly in the course of the Assyria and the restoration of Judah; therefore, fiery conquest of major urban centers. Was Nahum reflects Josianic interest in the fall of Josiah more immune to the charge of sacrilege Nineveh [pp. 198–207]) prove irresistible. than the Assyrian monarchs in the eyes of his A colleague of mine, Lowell K. Handy, who contemporaries, or do these biblical claims per- has published much on Josiah that Sweeney might haps come from a world removed from the age profit by (who by the way is never cited in the when Davidic kings ruled over Judah? And what bibliography of King Josiah of Judah), once de- kind of empire was the historic Josiah attempt- livered a conference lecture entitled “The Busy ing to create by killing priests and pulling down Scribes of Josiah’s Court.” In it, Handy culled altars? Are not such actions part of the reper- biblical studies publications for attributions of toire employed by enemies bent on sabotage biblical texts to Josiah and paraded portions of and reprisal rather than consolidating political Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuter- control? Sweeney frames his study with a re- onomy, Joshua, Judges, Samuel, Kings, First ceived portrait of the reformer-king Josiah, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Amos, Hosea, Micah, Zepha- would-be restorer of a Davidic Empire, a re- niah, Nahum, Habakkuk, the Korah Psalms, and capitulation of the DtrH’s cult apologetics that Ruth as claimants to Josianic authorship.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • God Disciplines a Rebellious People
    Unit .15 Session .05 God Disciplines a Rebellious People Scripture 2 Chronicles 36:11-21 11 Zedekiah was twenty-one years old when he began until there was no remedy. 17 Therefore he brought to reign, and he reigned eleven years in Jerusalem. up against them the king of the Chaldeans, who killed 12 He did what was evil in the sight of the Lord his their young men with the sword in the house of their God. He did not humble himself before Jeremiah the sanctuary and had no compassion on young man or prophet, who spoke from the mouth of the Lord. 13 virgin, old man or aged. He gave them all into his hand. He also rebelled against King Nebuchadnezzar, who 18 And all the vessels of the house of God, great and had made him swear by God. He stiffened his neck small, and the treasures of the house of the Lord, and and hardened his heart against turning to the Lord, the treasures of the king and of his princes, all these he the God of Israel. 14 All the officers of the priests brought to Babylon. 19 And they burned the house of and the people likewise were exceedingly unfaithful, God and broke down the wall of Jerusalem and burned following all the abominations of the nations. And they all its palaces with fire and destroyed all its precious polluted the house of the Lord that he had made holy vessels. 20 He took into exile in Babylon those who in Jerusalem. 15 TheLord , the God of their fathers, had escaped from the sword, and they became servants sent persistently to them by his messengers, because to him and to his sons until the establishment of the he had compassion on his people and on his dwelling kingdom of Persia, 21 to fulfill the word of the Lord place.
    [Show full text]
  • Josiah's Reform in Judah (2 Kgs 22-23//2 Chr 34- 35: Implications For
    770 Olanisebe, “Josiah’s Reform in Judah,” OTE 30/3 (2017): 770-784 Josiah’s Reform in Judah (2 Kgs 22-23//2 Chr 34- 35: Implications for Nigeria in Pursuit of a Sus- tained Democracy SAMSON OLUSINA OLANISEBE (DEPARTMENT OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES, OBAFEMI AWOLOWO UNIVERSITY, NIGERIA) ABSTRACT Josiah was a young boy of eight years when he assumed the position of leadership over the Southern kingdom of Israel. Before his ascen- sion to the throne, there were many structural defects in the kingdom. The immediate task before him was how to restructure and re-engi- neer the socio-religious decay he met on the ground, to which he responded promptly and with a record of success. This paper, there- fore, through narrative analysis, identifies the leadership and follow- ership qualities that assisted Josiah in his reform policy in Southern Israel and recommends, through content analysis, the imbibing of those qualities by the Nigerian leaders and citizenry in their quest for a sustained democracy. KEYWORDS: Democracy; followers; Josiah’s reform; leadership role; Nigeria. A INTRODUCTION The concept of democracy is traceable to the ancient Greeks, specifically the city-state of Athens in the fifth century BCE. The word democracy is derived from two Greek words “demos” meaning the people and “kratos,” meaning “power” or “rule.”1 Defining democracy is a herculean task because there is no universally acceptable definition. However, it has been defined by various schol- ars based on the features that a true democracy must have. Those features include a system where people rule themselves, a society based on equal opportunities and individual merit rather than hierarchy or privilege, a system of welfare and redistribution aimed at narrowing social inequalities, decision making based on majority rule, to mention just a few.2 In the words of Badru, democracy is a sys- tem of government that enables both the leaders and the citizens to be conscious * Article submitted: 26/01/2017; peer-reviewed: 20/03/2017; accepted: 11/07/2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Zedekiah: Last King of Judah
    ZEDEKIAH: LAST KING OF JUDAH SHIMON BAKON Zedekiah was the last King of Jud ah, in whose reign it collapsed under the onslaught of Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon, on the Ninth Day of Ab in the year 586 BCE. We may gain some better understanding of this disaster if we summarize the cataclysmic events that preceded it. A little less than 30 years earlier there had been two regional powers, Assy- ria to the north of Judah and Egypt to the south. The balance of power be- came disturbed when a new colossus began to stride across the entire Near East – Babylon. In 712, it destroyed Nineveh, the capital of Assyria. This was the beginning of the upheavals that led to the destruction of Judah. Egypt, deeply concerned about this new threat, moved northward to bolster the wan- ing power of Assyria. It set on the march in 608, moving via Judah. Josiah, a truly righteous king, attempted to stop the Egyptian forces, and was mortally wounded in battle at Megiddo. KING JOSIAH AND HIS SONS (Josiah killed in battle with Egypt in 608 BCE) JEHOAHAZ (608 BCE) JEHOIAKIM (608-597) (crowned by the (crowned by Neco of Egypt am-ha’aretz in 608 but became vassal and deposed by Egypt the of Babylonia) same year) JEHOIACHIN (597) ZEDEKIAH (597-586) Being a sympathizer (crowned by Babylon) of Egypt, he was deposed by Babylon) 1 The Judean am-haaretz – the landed gentry – put Josiah's son Jehoahaz on the throne, but Necho, the Egyptian pharaoh, hurried to depose him and carry him off into captivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Chart of the Kings of Israel and Judah
    The Kings of Israel & Judah Why Study the Kings? Chart of the Kings Questions for Discussion The Heritage of Jesus Host: Alan's Gleanings Alphabetical List of the Kings A Comment about Names God's Message of Salvation Kings of the United Kingdom (c 1025-925 BC) Relationship to God's King Previous King Judgment Saul none did evil Ishbosheth* son (unknown) David none did right Solomon did right in youth, son (AKA Jedidiah) evil in old age * The kingdom was divided during Ishbosheth's reign; David was king over the tribe of Judah. Kings of Judah (c 925-586 BC) Kings of Israel (c 925-721 BC) Relationship to God's Relationship to God's King King Previous King Judgment Previous King Judgment Rehoboam son did evil Abijam Jeroboam servant did evil son did evil (AKA Abijah) Nadab son did evil Baasha none did evil Asa son did right Elah son did evil Zimri captain did evil Omri captain did evil Ahab son did evil Jehoshaphat son did right Ahaziah son did evil Jehoram son did evil (AKA Joram) Jehoram son of Ahab did evil Ahaziah (AKA Joram) (AKA Azariah son did evil or Jehoahaz) Athaliah mother did evil Jehu captain mixed Joash did right in youth, son of Ahaziah Jehoahaz son did evil (AKA Jehoash) evil in old age Joash did right in youth, son did evil Amaziah son (AKA Jehoash) evil in old age Jeroboam II son did evil Zachariah son did evil did evil Uzziah Shallum none son did right (surmised) (AKA Azariah) Menahem none did evil Pekahiah son did evil Jotham son did right Pekah captain did evil Ahaz son did evil Hoshea none did evil Hezekiah son did right Manasseh son did evil Amon son did evil Josiah son did right Jehoahaz son did evil (AKA Shallum) Jehoiakim Assyrian captivity son of Josiah did evil (AKA Eliakim) Jehoiachin (AKA Coniah son did evil or Jeconiah) Zedekiah son of Josiah did evil (AKA Mattaniah) Babylonian captivity Color Code Legend: King did right King did evil Other.
    [Show full text]
  • What Did King Josiah Reform?
    Chapter 17 What Did King Josiah Reform? Margaret Barker King Josiah changed the religion of Israel in 623 BC. According to the Old Testament account in 2 Kings 23, he removed all manner of idolatrous items from the temple and purified his kingdom of Canaanite practices. Temple vessels made for Baal, Asherah, and the host of heaven were removed, idolatrous priests were deposed, the Asherah itself was taken from the temple and burned, and much more besides. An old law book had been discovered in the temple, and this had prompted the king to bring the religion of his kingdom into line with the requirements of that book (2 Kings 22:8–13; 2 Chronicles 34:14–20).1 There could be only one temple, it stated, and so all other places of sacrificial worship had to be destroyed (Deuteronomy 12:1–5). The law book is easily recognizable as Deuteronomy, and so King Josiah’s purge is usually known as the Deuteronomic reform of the temple. In 598 BC, twenty-five years after the work of Josiah, Jerusalem was attacked by the Babylonians under King Nebuchadnezzar (2 Kings 24:10– 16; 25:1–9); eleven years after the first attack, they returned to destroy the city and the temple (586 BC). Refugees fled south to Egypt, and we read in the book of Jeremiah how they would not accept the prophet’s interpretation of the disaster (Jeremiah 44:16–19). Jeremiah insisted that Jerusalem had fallen because of the sins of her people, but the refugees said it had fallen because of Josiah.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 15 • Session 2 the Southern Kingdom of Judah
    Unit 15 • Session 2 The Southern Kingdom of Judah Use Week of: Unit 15 • Session 2 Hezekiah and Josiah BIBLE PASSAGE: 2 Chronicles 29; 34–35 STORY POINT: God planned to send Jesus. KEY PASSAGE: 2 Chronicles 7:14b CHRIST CONNECTION: Jesus always obeyed God perfectly. Bible Story for Toddlers King Hezekiah of Judah loved God, just like his grandfather King David. Hezekiah said to the priests, “Our fathers turned away from God, and He punished them. Get rid of every evil thing in the temple. We will obey God.” The priests did what Hezekiah said, and the people loved God again. After Hezekiah died, though, the people forgot God. Many years later, Josiah became king when he was a boy. Josiah loved God too. Josiah repaired the temple and found God’s law. The priest read the words of God’s law to Josiah. Then Josiah invited all the people to the temple and read the law to them. While Josiah was king, the people loved God and obeyed Him. Babies Gospel Gems * Hezekiah and Josiah loved God. * Judah obeyed God when the king obeyed Him. * Jesus helps His people obey God. Additional resources are available at gospelproject.com. For free training and session-by-session help, visit MinistryGrid.com/gospelproject. Babies & Toddlers Leader Guide 38 Unit 15 • Session 2 BABIES Activities Look in the Bible Provide hand-size Bibles for babies to handle. Open your Bible to 2 Chronicles 29. Show the Bible story picture as you say the gospel gems in a soothing voice. Read the key passage card.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ironic Death of Josiah in 2 Chronicles
    3mitchell.qxd 5/1/2006 9:29 AM Page 421 The Ironic Death of Josiah in 2 Chronicles CHRISTINE MITCHELL St. Andrew’s College Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W3, Canada MOST RECENT STUDIES OF 2 Chronicles 34–35 have attempted to deal with various historical issues of the text.1 Although many of the insights from these studies are valuable, very little attention has been paid to reading Josiah’s rule and death in 2 Chronicles from a literary perspective.2 In this contribution, there- fore, I propose a literary reading of 2 Chronicles 34–35 on the terms of the Chron- I would like to thank Gary Knoppers and Ehud Ben Zvi for their comments on this article as it evolved. Any errors that remain are, of course, my own. 1 The discussion began with H. G. M. Williamson, “The Death of Josiah and the Continuing Development of the Deuteronomic History,” VT 32 (1982) 242-48, and continued with C. T. Begg, “The Death of Josiah: Another View,” VT 37 (1987) 1-8; H. G. M. Williamson, “Reliving the Death of Josiah: A Reply to C. T. Begg,” VT 37 (1987) 9-15; Zipora Talshir, “The Three Deaths of Josiah and the Strata of Biblical Historiography (2 Kings xxiii 29-30; 2 Chronicles xxxv 20-5; 1 Esdras i 23-31),” VT 46 (1996) 213-36; Baruch Halpern, “Why Manasseh Is Blamed for the Babylonian Exile: The Evolution of a Biblical Tradition,” VT 48 (1998) 473-514. The work in these articles is often in conversation with that of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Scripturalization and the Aaronide Dynasties
    Journal of Hebrew Scriptures Volume 13, Article 6 DOI:10.5508/jhs.2013.v13.a6 Scripturalization and the Aaronide Dynasties JAMES W. WATTS Articles in JHS are being indexed in the ATLA Religion Database, RAMBI, and BiBIL. Their abstracts appear in Religious and Theological Abstracts. The journal is archived by Library and Archives Canada and is accessible for consultation and research at the Electronic Collection site maintained by Library and Archives Canada. ISSN 1203–1542 http://www.jhsonline.org and http://purl.org/jhs SCRIPTURALIZATION AND THE AARONIDE DYNASTIES JAMES W. WATTS SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY Evidence for the history of the Second Temple priesthood is very fragmentary and incomplete. To the best of our knowledge, how- ever, worship at the temple site in Jerusalem was controlled from ca. 535 to 172 B.C.E. by a single family, the descendants of Jeshua ben Jehozadak, the first post-exilic high priest (the family is often called the Oniads). After disruptions caused by civil wars and the Maccabean Revolt, they were replaced by another family, the Hasmoneans, who controlled the high priesthood from at least 152 until 37 B.C.E. Sources from the Second Temple period indicate that both families claimed descent from Israel’s first high priest, Aaron.1 1 For the Oniads’ genealogical claims, see 1 Chr 6:3–15; Ezra 2:36; 3:2. For the Hasmoneans’ claims, see 1 Macc 2:1; cf. 1 Chr 24:7. No ancient source challenges these claims, but many modern historians have been skeptical of them (e.g., J. Wellhausen, Prolegomena to the History of Israel [trans.
    [Show full text]
  • Week Twenty-Two Byblos CAMPAIGNS AGAINST JUDAH Reading Plan 2 Kings 23-25 2 Chronicles 36 Jeremiah 39; 52 Habakkuk 3:1-19  City Habakkuk’S  Mountain Peak Abana R
    THE END OF JUDAH Week 22: The Single Kingdom, Judah, Falls (2 Chronicles 36; Jeremiah; Habakkuk; Daniel; Ezekiel) The last four kings of Judah were vassals of either of Egypt or of Babylon. Three were Josiah’s sons, and one was his grandson. None followed the way of the Lord. This last period, lasting less than twenty-five years, is told in 2 Kings 23-25 and 2 Chronicles 36. Supplementary details are included in the book of Jeremiah. Jehoahaz (609BC) Josiah’s son Jehoahaz (also called Shallum) was not the oldest, but the people of Judah chose him to become king after Josiah was killed in battle. Three months later he was taken as Pharaoh Neco’s prisoner. Neco levied a huge tribute from Judah and installed Jehoahaz’s older brother Jehoiakim as his vassal in Jerusalem. Jehoiakim (609-598BC) This son of Josiah was two years older than Jehoahaz. He ruled for eleven years and was known for his vicious persecution of Jeremiah. After the Babylonian army defeated the Egyptians in 605, it attacked Jerusalem (Dan. 1:1-2). Jehoiakim shifted his loyalty to Babylon, and a number of the upper-class members of Jerusalem were taken to Babylon. It was at this time that Daniel was deported as an exile, and his interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream took place the following year (Dan. 2:1). In the meantime, however, Jehoiakim, was allowed to continue reigning as Nebuchadnezzar’s vassal. After three years, Jehoiakim foolishly tried to shake off the Babylonian yoke (2 Kings 24:1), believing that re-alliance with Egypt would provide a better opportunity for Judah.
    [Show full text]
  • 52 Walter Brueggemann. Truth Speaks to Power
    Walter Brueggemann. Truth Speaks to Power: The Countercultural Nature of Scripture. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2013. 176 pages. $17. Walter Brueggemann latest book, Truth Speaks to Power, emerges from his lecture at Kenyon College on biblical faith and public policy, posing the question, “How does truth speak to power?” While Brueggemann does not offer concrete suggestions for how the Bible informs public policy, he does offer a narrative context for how truth interacts with power in the Old Testament. Brueggemann defines power as “a network of influence and leverage” (2), seen in political regimes and monopolies of wealth, though these two are usually synonymous. Those in powerful positions often justify their roles with truth claims, but truth has a way of eluding and challenging power. Brueggemann writes: “truth, unlike establishment power that is visible, is characteristically elusive and contested because the claims made for truth are variously endorsements of or subversions of established power” (3-4). Brueggemann lifts up truth and power within the biblical narrative, focusing on Moses, Solomon, Elisha, and Josiah. Truth in these narratives represents the justice of God, sometimes working in spite of current power arrangements, though sometimes working with or over against current power regimes. Brueggemann makes clear he is not setting up a typology—truth against power vs. truth transforming power, etc., reminiscent of H. Richard Niebuhr’s Christ and Culture. Rather, he is attempting to listen to the subtleties of the truth narrative and how in different biblical stories it speaks to power. Opening the way for a critical reading of power in the Scriptures, Brueggemann makes references to the “masters of suspicion”—a phrase attributed to Paul Ricoeur and referring to Freud, Marx, and Nietzsche.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingship, Coronation, and Covenant in Mosiah 1–6
    Kingship, Coronation, and Covenant in Mosiah 1–6 Stephen D. Ricks The rst six chapters of Mosiah also portray for us the succession of Mosiah2 to the Nephite throne. To a striking degree, many features of this coronation ceremony reect aspects of ancient Israelite culture. A close look at these correspondences shows how faithfully the Book of Mormon depicts Old World practices and beliefs. Kingship The Meaning of Kingship Although kingship is a political institution whose origins are lost to history, nearly every ancient and medieval civilization had a king who was believed to have been appointed by heaven. The Egyptians held that kingship had existed as long as the world itself; to the Sumerians, this form of rule was a gift from the gods. The Israelites also believed that the king was appointed and adopted by God and that “he mediated between God and the people and represented them before each other.”1 Although the Nephite king was never viewed as a divine being (which would be inconsistent with Deuteronomy 17:15), he was closely connected with God in the sense that, as an intermediate, he too modeled and represented God to his people (as in Mosiah 2:19). In the ancient view of God’s conferral of governmental power upon the king, the traditional code of royalty—which stipulates that the monarch receive sacred names and powers—allows him to stand in the place of God before his people. That ceremony “contained in particular the ancient titles and sovereign rights and duties conferred on Pharaoh by the god, in brief, the king’s authority to rule as the surrogate of the god.”2 In the case of Benjamin’s speech, a similar ideology is to an extent operational: Benjamin conferred upon Mosiah, and also upon the people, a new name (see Mosiah 5:8); he entrusted Mosiah with other insignia of his royal ofce (see Mosiah 1:15–16); and he mentioned Mosiah’s right and duty to deliver to his people the commandments of God and to lead them in the ways of peace and well-being (see Mosiah 2:31; see also 5:5).
    [Show full text]
  • And 'Of the Kings of Israel': What Sort of Books
    THE BOOKS OF THE CHRONICLES ‘OF THE KINGS OF JUDAH’ AND ‘OF THE KINGS OF ISRAEL’: WHAT SORT OF BOOKS WERE THEY? by MENAHEM HARAN Jerusalem For Frank Moore Cross in friendship and respect I The ‘Book ( sepher) of the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah’ is referred to fteen times by our Books of Kings (the rst time in 1 Kgs. xiv 29) and the ‘Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Israel’ eigh- teen times (the rst reference being 1 Kgs. xiv 19). The ‘Book of the Acts (diºerê, but LXXL ²merÇn = hayyˆmîm l e, i.e. the Chronicles) of Solomon’ (1 Kgs. xi 41) seems to have been a book of the same kind as the rst two, but con ned to the reign of Solomon. The Books of Kings refer to these books in a standard and schematic formula: ‘And the other events of PN’s reign’— sometimes adding some deed of his (e.g. with respect to Jeroboam son of Nebat [1 Kgs. xiv 19], to Asa [1 Kgs. xv 23], to Baasha [1 Kgs. xvi 5], to Zimri [1 Kgs. xvi 20])— ‘are recorded in the Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Israel’ (or ‘of the Kings of Judah’). Just what were these ‘chronicles’ and what purpose did they serve? Some scholars say that they were annals, pure and simple, i.e. an oYcial record of the events of the king’s reign. 1 Yet it is evident that 1 Scholars had already reached this conclusion in the 19th century. For our time see, e.g.
    [Show full text]