DOCSLIB.ORG

Modern Tram and Public Transport Integration in Chinese Cities: a Case Study of Suzhou

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Modern Tram and Public Transport Integration in Chinese Cities: A case study of Suzhou Discussion2 Paper1 2017 • 21 Chia-Lin Chen Department of Urban Planning and Design, Xian Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China Modern Tram and Public Transport Integration in Chinese Cities A case study of Suzhou Discussion Paper No. 2017-21 Prepared for the Roundtable on Integrated and Sustainable Urban Transport (24-25 April 2017, Tokyo) Chia-Lin Chen Department of Urban Planning and Design, Xian Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China July 2017 The International Transport Forum The International Transport Forum is an intergovernmental organisation with 59 member countries. It acts as a think tank for transport policy and organises the Annual Summit of transport ministers. ITF is the only global body that covers all transport modes. The ITF is politically autonomous and administratively integrated with the OECD. The ITF works for transport policies that improve peoples’ lives. Our mission is to foster a deeper understanding of the role of transport in economic growth, environmental sustainability and social inclusion and to raise the public profile of transport policy. The ITF organises global dialogue for better transport. We act as a platform for discussion and pre- negotiation of policy issues across all transport modes. We analyse trends, share knowledge and promote exchange among transport decision-makers and civil society. The ITF’s Annual Summit is the world’s largest gathering of transport ministers and the leading global platform for dialogue on transport policy. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China (People’s Republic of), Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States. International Transport Forum 2 rue André Pascal F-75775 Paris Cedex 16 [email protected] www.itf-oecd.org ITF Discussion Papers ITF Discussion Papers make economic research, commissioned or carried out in-house at ITF, available to researchers and practitioners. They describe preliminary results or research in progress by the author(s) and are published to stimulate discussion on a broad range of issues on which the ITF works. Any findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Transport Forum or the OECD. Neither the OECD, ITF nor the authors guarantee the accuracy of any data or other information contained in this publication and accept no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Comments on Discussion Papers are welcome. Chia-Lin Chen – Modern Tram and Public Transit Integration in Chinese Cities- A Case Study of Suzhou Acknowledgements The author is grateful to several contributors for this report. First of all, Mr Jianglian Han, Deputy Manager of Suzhou National High-tech District (SND) tram company and Mr Jun Fan, Director of Transport Unit in Suzhou Planning and Design Research Institute Co. Ltd. kindly spared time for interview and provided valuable insights into the decision-making process, key concerns of the modern tram developmet in SND, and transport planning and management in Suzhou. Secondly, the questionnaire survey would not have been possible without research assistance from Master students Gao Du and Huahui Ai as well as four undergraduate students, namely Kexiang Huang, Ran Bi, Siyi Lin, Yifeng Xu. Thirdly, thanks go to my research assitants, Huahui Ai and Yuyi Zhao for their help in data collection and maps drawn for this report. Lastly but not least, constructive discussions in Tokyo Roundtable and valuable comments given by Daniel Veryard at the ITF secretariat have been useful for this revised discussion paper. ITF Discussion Paper 2017-21— © OECD/ITF 2017 3 Chia-Lin Chen – Modern Tram and Public Transit Integration in Chinese Cities - A Case Study of Suzhou Abstract This paper explores the role of modern trams in Chinese cities and identifies issues and challenges of integrating modern trams with other public transport modes. The Suzhou National High-tech District (SND) Tram is chosen as a representative case for study. The findings show that, due to the strict national policy and approval procedures, trams are often planned and constructed as a good alternative to metro systems. Instead of practically addressing transport congestion, with a “development-driven” and “control and management” ideology, the current approach emphasises new development and avoids potential confrontation and social unrest in dense urban areas. As a result, despite massive investment in tram and other public transport modes, public transport mobility is not competititve against car mobility. Lessons learnt from the Suzhou tram case include prioritising public transport, well articulating public transport systems at multiple levels, combining strategic planning and supportive policies, enabling open competition for tram operation, and exercising leadership for collective goverance. 4 ITF Discussion Paper 2017-21 — © OECD/ITF 2017 Chia-Lin Chen – Modern Tram and Public Transit Integration in Chinese Cities - A Case Study of Suzhou Table of Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Policies and mechanisms for developing urban rail in China .............................................................. 7 Definition of urban rail systems in China ............................................................................................... 7 National policy for urban rail development ............................................................................................ 8 Rapid urbanisation and development of urban rail and trams .......................................................... 12 Urban rail development in China .......................................................................................................... 13 Tram development in China .................................................................................................................. 14 A case study of Suzhou ........................................................................................................................... 16 A brief introduction to Suzhou and Suzhou National High-Tech District ............................................ 16 Urban rail development in Suzhou and SND ........................................................................................ 17 Network planning and motivations for the SND tram .......................................................................... 22 Use of the SND tram ............................................................................................................................. 23 Current approaches to integration and its impacts ................................................................................ 25 Conclusions and future implications .................................................................................................... 33 References ............................................................................................................................................... 35 Notes ........................................................................................................................................................ 36 Figures Figure 1. National policy framework and guidelines for urban rail development in China ........................ 9 Figure 2. Planning integration and rail construction plan procedures in China ....................................... 10 Figure 3. Extent of urban rail public transport networks in operation in Chinese cities , 2005 and 2015. 13 Figure 4. Urban rail passenget traffic, 2015 .............................................................................................. 14 Figure 5. The location of SND within Suzhou .......................................................................................... 17 Figure 6. Key development zones in SND ................................................................................................ 17 Figure 7. Composition of motor vehicles in Suzhou, 1988-2015 .............................................................. 18 Figure 8. Suzhou long-term rail network plan (2007-2020) ...................................................................... 19 Figure 9. Passenger traffic by transport modes in Suzhou urban districts, 2011-15 ................................. 20 Figure 10. External transport links in SND ............................................................................................... 21 Figure 11. The SND tram network plan 2030 ..........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Integrating Urban Public Transport Systems and Cycling Summary And

    Integrating Urban Public Transport Systems and Cycling Summary And

    CPB Corporate Partnership Board Integrating Urban Public Transport Systems and Cycling 166 Roundtable Summary and Conclusions Integrating Urban Public Transport Systems and Cycling Summary and Conclusions of the ITF Roundtable on Integrated and Sustainable Urban Transport 24-25 April 2017, Tokyo Daniel Veryard and Stephen Perkins with contributions from Aimee Aguilar-Jaber and Tatiana Samsonova International Transport Forum, Paris The International Transport Forum The International Transport Forum is an intergovernmental organisation with 59 member countries. It acts as a think tank for transport policy and organises the Annual Summit of transport ministers. ITF is the only global body that covers all transport modes. The ITF is politically autonomous and administratively integrated with the OECD. The ITF works for transport policies that improve peoples’ lives. Our mission is to foster a deeper understanding of the role of transport in economic growth, environmental sustainability and social inclusion and to raise the public profile of transport policy. The ITF organises global dialogue for better transport. We act as a platform for discussion and pre- negotiation of policy issues across all transport modes. We analyse trends, share knowledge and promote exchange among transport decision-makers and civil society. The ITF’s Annual Summit is the world’s largest gathering of transport ministers and the leading global platform for dialogue on transport policy. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Argentina, Australia, Austria,
  • The Operator's Story Case Study: Guangzhou's Story

    The Operator's Story Case Study: Guangzhou's Story

    Railway and Transport Strategy Centre The Operator’s Story Case Study: Guangzhou’s Story © World Bank / Imperial College London Property of the World Bank and the RTSC at Imperial College London Community of Metros CoMET The Operator’s Story: Notes from Guangzhou Case Study Interviews February 2017 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide a permanent record for the researchers of what was said by people interviewed for ‘The Operator’s Story’ in Guangzhou, China. These notes are based upon 3 meetings on the 11th March 2016. This document will ultimately form an appendix to the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’ piece. Although the findings have been arranged and structured by Imperial College London, they remain a collation of thoughts and statements from interviewees, and continue to be the opinions of those interviewed, rather than of Imperial College London. Prefacing the notes is a summary of Imperial College’s key findings based on comments made, which will be drawn out further in the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’. Method This content is a collation in note form of views expressed in the interviews that were conducted for this study. This mini case study does not attempt to provide a comprehensive picture of Guangzhou Metropolitan Corporation (GMC), but rather focuses on specific topics of interest to The Operators’ Story project. The research team thank GMC and its staff for their kind participation in this project. Comments are not attributed to specific individuals, as agreed with the interviewees and GMC. List of interviewees Meetings include the following GMC members: Mr.
  • 2018 International Student Handbook.Pdf

    2018 International Student Handbook.Pdf

    2018 LCC International Students Guidebook 1. OVERVIEW OF LINGANG ....................................... 2 2. APPLICATION SYSTEM LOG-IN ................................. 3 3. REGISTRATION ................................................ 4 4. TUITION PAYMENT ............................................. 6 5. ACCOMMODATION ............................................. 7 6. FOOD ......................................................... 10 7. SHOPPING ..................................................... 13 8. TRANSPORT ................................................... 14 9. HEALTH INSURANCE .......................................... 20 10. VISA AFFAIRS ................................................. 25 11. SCHOLARSHIP STUDENT ISSUES ............................... 28 12. BANKING ..................................................... 32 13. SIM Card Purchase in Mainland China ............................. 33 14. ABOUT SJTU .................................................. 34 15. TOP ATTRACTIONS IN SHANGHAI ............................. 34 16. CITIES NEARBY ............................................... 37 17. USEFUL APPS ................................................. 39 18. USEFUL WEBSITES ............................................ 40 19. CONTACT US ................................................. 41 China-UK Low Carbon College No3, Yinlian Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai 1 1. OVERVIEW OF LINGANG Lingang is located at the southeast tip of continental Shanghai. It is 75 km away from the City Centre of Shanghai. Standing at the
  • Research on Decision-Making of Service Quality Improvement In

    Research on Decision-Making of Service Quality Improvement In

    2019 International Conference on Advanced Education and Management (ICAEM 2019) ISBN: 978-1-60595-635-0 Research on Decision-making of Service Quality Improvement in Xiamen Metro Based on IPA and PZB Model Ju-Xiang ZHANGa and Ming-Hui JIAb Tan Kah Kee College, Xiamen University, Zhang Zhou, China [email protected], [email protected] Keywords: Xiamen Metro; Service Quality; IPA Analysis Model; PZB Service Quality Gap Model. Abstract. Urban public transportation plays a very important role in contemporary social travel, which means one the social development and progress of a public transport is urban rail transit -- metro. This study from Xiamen city metro which was just in the beginning, it took the selection from the service quality as a measure, it effective combined the PZB service quality gap model with the model of IPA, it first found out its quality elements by using PZB service quality gap model, and then analyzed the service quality evaluation through the IPA model. The problems in the service process are found out, in order to solve these problems, the decision methods that can improve these problems are proposed. Introduction Urban rail traffic not only meets the needs of residents, but also represents the development level of a city and the living standard of local residents. Quality service can improve customer perception, to meet the psychological needs of passengers and generate positive effects such as customer loyalty. Xiamen metro is in the service of urban rail transit system in Xiamen, Fujian province, China. Xiamen metro’s line 1, with a total length of about 267 kilometers, opened on December 31, 2017.
  • 中國鐵路通信信號股份有限公司 China Railway

    中國鐵路通信信號股份有限公司 China Railway

    Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this announcement, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this announcement. 中國鐵路通信信號股份有限公司 China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited* (A joint stock limited liability company incorporated in the People’s Republic of China) (Stock Code: 3969) ANNOUNCEMENT ON BID-WINNING OF IMPORTANT PROJECTS IN THE RAIL TRANSIT MARKET This announcement is made by China Railway Signal & Communication Corporation Limited* (the “Company”) pursuant to Rules 13.09 and 13.10B of the Rules Governing the Listing of Securities on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the “Listing Rules”) and the Inside Information Provisions (as defined in the Listing Rules) under Part XIVA of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Chapter 571 of the Laws of Hong Kong). From May to June 2020, the Company has won a total of seven important projects in the rail transit market. Among which, four are acquired from the railway market, namely four power and the related works for the “weak electricity integration” tender section of the newly built Huanggang- Huangmei Railway (“Huang Huang High-speed Railway”) with a tender amount of RMB255 million, “four power” and the related works for the ZJHSD-2 tender section of the newly built Zhangjiajie-Jishou-Huaihua Railway (“Zhang Ji Huai High-speed Railway”) with a tender amount of RMB670 million, relocation works for the second tender section of the newly built Henghuang section of Shihengcang Port Intercity Railway (“Second Tender of Shihengcang Port Intercity Railway Relocation”) with a tender amount of RMB581 million, and four power and the related works for the DRSD-2 tender section of the newly built Dali-Ruili Railway (“Darui Railway”) with a tender amount of RMB419 million.
  • Guangzhou South Railway Station 广州南站/ South of Shixing Avenue, Shibi Street, Fanyu District

    Guangzhou South Railway Station 广州南站/ South of Shixing Avenue, Shibi Street, Fanyu District

    Guangzhou South Railway Station 广州南站/ South of Shixing Avenue, Shibi Street, Fanyu District, Guangzhou 广州番禹区石壁街石兴大道南 (86-020-39267222) Quick Guide General Information Board the Train / Leave the Station Transportation Station Details Station Map Useful Sentences General Information Guangzhou South Railway Station (广州南站), also called New Guangzhou Railway Station, is located at Shibi Street, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong. It has served Guangzhou since 2010, and is 17 kilometers from the city center. It is one the four main railway stations in Guangzhou. The other three are Guangzhou Railway Station, Guangzhou North Railway Station, and Guangzhou East Railway Station. After its opening, Guangzhou South Railway Station has been gradually taking the leading role of train transport from Guangzhou Railway Station, becoming one of the six key passenger train hubs of China. Despite of its easy accessibility from every corner of the city, ticket-checking and waiting would take a long time so we strongly suggest you be at the station as least 2 hours prior to your departure time, especially if you haven’t bought tickets in advance. Board the Train / Leave the Station Boarding progress at Guangzhou South Railway Station: Square of Guangzhou South Railway Station Ticket Office (售票处) at the east and northeast corner of F1 Get to the Departure Level F1 by escalator E nter waiting section after security check Buy tickets (with your travel documents) Pick up tickets (with your travel documents and booking number) Find your own waiting line according to the LED screen or your tickets TOP Wait for check-in Have tickets checked and take your luggage Walk through the passage and find your boarding platform Board the train and find your seat Leaving Guangzhou South Railway Station: Passengers can walk through the tunnel to the exit after the trains pull off.
  • A Model Layout Region Optimization for Feeder Buses of Rail Transit

    A Model Layout Region Optimization for Feeder Buses of Rail Transit

    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 43 ( 2012 ) 773 – 780 8th International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies Changsha, China, August 1–3, 2012 A Model Layout Region Optimization for Feeder Buses of Rail Transit Yucong Hua, Qi Zhanga, Weiping Wangb,* a School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China b Dongguan Geographic Information & Urban Planning Research Center, Dongguan 523129, China Abstract This paper analyses the characteristics of urban rail transit and conventional buses and then expands on the necessity of combining them. Based on previous studies, a method of laying region and route of urban rail transit feeder buses is proposed. According to the definition of marginal trip distance which is the boundary of choosing a direct bus or rail-feeder bus (transfer is considered here) to destination, the influence of service level on passenger’s choosing behavior is combined with the generalized trip cost in the indirect gravitation-regions of urban rail transit. On this basis, a model for layout region of feeder buses is constructed and an algorithm is proposed. Finally, a numerical example of the joining routine layout between urban rail transit and conventional buses in Baiyun District, Guangzhou City, China is presented to evaluate the model. The result shows that the model with high accuracy is easy to apply, and is the important basis for laying design of feeder buses. © 20122012 PublishedPublished by by Elsevier Elsevier B.V. Ltd. Selection Selection and/or and peerpeer-review review under unde rresponsibility responsibility of ofBeijing Beijing Jiaotong Jiaotong University [BJU],(BJU) andSystems Systems Engineering Engineering Society Society of China of China (SESC) (SESC).
  • Comparison Between Bus Rapid Transit and Light-Rail Transit Systems: a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach

    Comparison Between Bus Rapid Transit and Light-Rail Transit Systems: a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach

    Urban Transport XXIII 143 COMPARISON BETWEEN BUS RAPID TRANSIT AND LIGHT-RAIL TRANSIT SYSTEMS: A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS APPROACH MARÍA EUGENIA LÓPEZ LAMBAS1, NADIA GIUFFRIDA2, MATTEO IGNACCOLO2 & GIUSEPPE INTURRI2 1TRANSyT, Transport Research Centre, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain 2Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAR), University of Catania, Italy ABSTRACT The construction choice between two different transport systems in urban areas, as in the case of Light-Rail Transit (LRT) and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) solutions, is often performed on the basis of cost-benefit analysis and geometrical constraints due to the available space for the infrastructure. Classical economic analysis techniques are often unable to take into account some of the non-monetary parameters which have a huge impact on the final result of the choice, since they often include social acceptance and sustainability aspects. The application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques can aid decision makers in the selection process, with the possibility to compare non-homogeneous criteria, both qualitative and quantitative, and allowing the generation of an objective ranking of the different alternatives. The coupling of MCDA and Geographic Information System (GIS) environments also permits an easier and faster analysis of spatial parameters, and a clearer representation of indicator comparisons. Based on these assumptions, a LRT and BRT system will be analysed according to their own transportation, economic, social and environmental impacts as a hypothetical exercise; moreover, through the use of MCDA techniques a global score for both systems will be determined, in order to allow for a fully comprehensive comparison. Keywords: BHLS, urban transport, transit systems, TOPSIS.
  • Nomination Form International Memory of the World Register

    Nomination Form International Memory of the World Register

    Nomination form International Memory of the World Register 1.0 Checklist Nominees may find the following checklist useful before sending the nomination form to the International Memory of the World Secretariat. The information provided in italics on the form is there for guidance only and should be deleted once the sections have been completed. Summary completed (section 1) ◻ Nomination and contact details completed (section 2) ◻ Declaration of Authority signed and dated (section 2) ◻ If this is a joint nomination, section 2 appropriately modified, and all Declarations of Authority ◻ obtained Documentary heritage identified (sections 3.1 – 3.3) ◻ History/provenance completed (section 3.4) ◻ Bibliography completed (section 3.5) ◻ Names, qualifications and contact details of up to three independent people or organizations ◻ recorded (section 3.6) Details of owner completed (section 4.1) ◻ Details of custodian – if different from owner – completed (section 4.2) ◻ Details of legal status completed (section 4.3) ◻ Details of accessibility completed (section 4.4) ◻ Details of copyright status completed (section 4.5) ◻ 1 Evidence presented to support fulfilment of the criteria? (section 5) ◻ Additional information provided (section 6) ◻ Details of consultation with stakeholders completed (section 7) ◻ Assessment of risk completed (section 8) ◻ Summary of Preservation and Access Management Plan completed. If there is no formal Plan ◻ attach details about current and/or planned access, storage and custody arrangements (section 9) Any other information
  • Taxis As Urban Transport

    Taxis As Urban Transport

    TØI report 1308/2014 Jørgen Aarhaug Taxis as urban transport TØI Report 1308/2014 Taxis as urban transport Jørgen Aarhaug This report is covered by the terms and conditions specified by the Norwegian Copyright Act. Contents of the report may be used for referencing or as a source of information. Quotations or references must be attributed to the Institute of Transport Economics (TØI) as the source with specific mention made to the author and report number. For other use, advance permission must be provided by TØI. ISSN 0808-1190 ISBN 978-82-480-1511-6 Electronic version Oslo, mars 2014 Title: Taxis as urban transport Tittel: Drosjer som del av bytransporttilbudet Author(s): Jørgen Aarhaug Forfattere: Jørgen Aarhaug Date: 04.2014 Dato: 04.2014 TØI report: 1308/2014 TØI rapport: 1308/2014 Pages 29 Sider 29 ISBN Electronic: 978-82-480-1511-6 ISBN Elektronisk: 978-82-480-1511-6 ISSN 0808-1190 ISSN 0808-1190 Financed by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Finansieringskilde: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Institute of Transport Economics Transportøkonomisk institutt Project: 3888 - Taxi module Prosjekt: 3888 - Taxi module Quality manager: Frode Longva Kvalitetsansvarlig: Frode Longva Key words: Regulation Emneord: Drosje Taxi Regulering Summary: Sammendrag: Taxis are an instantly recognizable form of transport, existing in Drosjer finnes i alle byer og de er umiddelbart gjenkjennelige. almost every city in the world. Still the roles that are filled by Likevel er det stor variasjon i hva som ligger i begrepet drosje, og taxis varies much from city to city. Regulation of the taxi hvilken rolle drosjene har i det lokale transportsystemet.
  • [Halshs-00717879, V1] New Port Development and Global City Making

    [Halshs-00717879, V1] New Port Development and Global City Making

    Author manuscript, published in "Journal of Transport Geography 25 (2012) 58-69" New port development and global city making: Emergence of the Shanghai-Yangshan multilayered gateway hub Chengjin WANG Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR) Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Beijing 100101, China [email protected] César DUCRUET French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) UMR 8504 Géographie-cités F-75006 Paris, France [email protected] Abstract Planned as Shanghai's new port, Yangshan is currently expanding its roles as transhipment hub and integrated logistics/industrial center in the Asia-Pacific region. This paper examines the impact of the emergence of Yangshan on the spatial pattern of the Yangtze River Delta since the 1970s, with reference to existing port system spatial evolutionary halshs-00717879, version 1 - 13 Nov 2012 models. While this emergence confirms the trend of offshore hub development and regionalization processes observed in other regions, we also discuss noticeable deviations due to territorial and governance issues. Strong national policies favoring Shanghai's vicinity rather than Ningbo as well as the growth of Yangshan beyond sole transhipment functions all contribute to Shanghai's transformation into a global city. Keywords: Asia; China; corridor; offshore hub; port system evolution; urban growth; Yangtze River Delta 1 1. Introduction Throughout the literature on port cities, a majority of the research provides a separate discussion on either port or urban functions. Port and urban specialists often focus on what may appear as processes and actors of distinctly different nature. One example is the large body of research on so-called port systems where neighbouring port nodes go through successive development phases marked by varying traffic concentration levels.
  • China Ex-Post Evaluation of Japanese ODA Loan Project

    China Ex-Post Evaluation of Japanese ODA Loan Project

    China Ex-Post Evaluation of Japanese ODA Loan Project Chongqing Urban Railway Construction Project External Evaluator: Kenichi Inazawa, Office Mikage, LLC 1. Project Description Map of the Project Area Chongqing Monorail Line 2 1.1 Background Under its policies of reform and openness China has been achieving economic growth averaging about 10% per year. On the other hand, along with the economic progress, urban development, and rising living standards brought about by the reforms and opening up, problems caused by the underdevelopment of urban infrastructure in major cities have surfaced. As a result, traffic congestion and air pollution were becoming increasingly serious. Chongqing City is located in the eastern part of the Sichuan basin on the upper reaches of the Chang River. In 1997 the city became the fourth directly-controlled municipality in China following Beijing, Shanghai and Tianjin. After Chongqing City became the directly-controlled municipality, the city began actively promoting introduction of foreign investment and becoming a driving force for economic development in inland regions of China. However, along with the economic development, traffic congestion became much worse in the central city areas1, impeding the functionality of the city, while air pollution increased due to exhaust gas from automobiles, leading to a worsening of the living environment. The situation reached a point where transportation via roads was being inhibited due to the terrain of Chongqing City and the condition of the existing city areas. The improvement of the urban environment was considered 1 The central part of Chongqing City is in a rugged mountainous area. It is divided in two by the Chang River and the Jialing River.