DOCSLIB.ORG

Office of Naval Research Global Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Office of Naval Research Global Overview Office of Naval Research Global Overview Dr. Walter F. Jones Executive Director February 13, 2013 The Office of Naval Research Naval Research Laboratory (Appropriations Act, 1916) “[Conduct] exploratory and research work…necessary …for the benefit of Government service, including the construction, equipment, and operation of a laboratory….” Office of Naval Research (Public Law 588, 1946) “…plan, foster, and encourage scientific research in Thomas recognition of its paramount importance as related to the Edison maintenance of future of naval power, and the preservation of Josephus national security…” Daniels Office of Naval Research - London Office (1946) “…reporting on the latest developments and to assist visiting American scientists to make contact with their colleagues in Europe…” Transitioning S&T (Defense Authorization Act, 2001) “…manage the Navy’s basic, applied, and advanced Harry S. Truman research to foster transition from science and technology to higher levels of research, Vannevar Bush development, test, and evaluation.” A Rich Tradition Present • Railgin Large Diameter UUV • Infantry Immersive Trainer Free Electron Laser • Super conducting Motors • Integrated Topside 2002 GWOT Support QuikClot Silver Fox Dragon Eye REMUS Sand Abatement Counter-IED 1995 1985 Clementine explores moon ONR funded tech finds Titanic 1981 Global atmospheric prediction 1972 model First GPS satellite in orbit 1967 1965 GPS concept validated SEALAB I & II 1964 Alvin enters service 1958 NASA established 1960 NRO established 1950 NSF established 1960 1934 1946 1st U.S. Intel satellite GRAB First U.S. radar ONR established launched by NRL, and Bathyscathe 1916 patents filed by NRL 1949 Trieste descends to 35,000 feet NRL funded 1st Navy Viking 1939 Rocket launched 1923 1928 1st nuclear sub design NRL First UAV flight Proposed by NRL established Who We Are ONR/NRL People: 3,900 Govn’t: 3,360 Contractor: 540 PhDs: 842 SES: 45 USNR: 212 4 ONR Organization Chief of Naval Research (00) NRL N091 Principal Executive Director (SES) Deputy for P&R Vice Chief of Naval Research (USMC)(09) BIZOPS ACNR (00B) ONRG AVCNR (09B) Director Director Director of of of Research Innovation Transition (03R) (INP) (03I) (03T) 30 31 32 33 34 35 Expeditionary Ocean Warfare & Sea Warfare Warfighter Air Warfare C4ISR Battlespace Combating- & Weapons Performance & Weapons Sensing (D&I) terrorism (FNC) SES SES SES SES SES ST 1 O-6 O-6 O-6 O-6 O-6 O-6 2 1 2 1 1 Unique Structure • All three S&T funding lines under one roof • Program Officer can see a program through D&I → Applied Science → Transition Basic Research 6.1 Applied research To advanced 6.2 electronics Advanced Tech Development 6.3 Leadership for S&T Dr. Walter Jones BGen Mark R. Wise RADM Matthew Klunder Executive Director Vice CNR Chief of Naval Research Guidance Comes From… ACTING Mr. Al Shaffer Assistant Secretary of Defense Assistant Secretary of the Navy Vice Chief of Assistant Commandant for Research & Engineering (Research, Development Naval Operations for the Marine Corps and Acquisition) Strategic Plan • Cascades from National, DoD and Service Guidance • Vetted by Fleet/Force Stakeholders • Approved by VCNO, ACMC and ASN (RDA) Broad 1-25 years Discovery & Invention (Basic and Applied Science) 5-10 years S&T Plan Focus Areas: 3-5 years Leap Ahead Innovations •Assure Access to Maritime Battlespace (Innovative Naval Prototypes) Focus •Autonomy & Unmanned Systems Acquisition Enablers ≈ 12% A2/ 1-2 years (FNCs, etc) ≈ 45% •Expeditionary & Irregular Warfare Quick Reaction & Other S&T AD ≈ 30% •Power Projection/Integrated Defense ≈ 8% •Information Dominance Narrow Near Time Frame Long •Power & Energy •Platform Design & Survivability •Total Ownership Cost •Warfighter Performance Tech Solutions FNCs INPs D&I Revised Sep 2011 - aligned with 2012 Defense Strategy 8 How We Execute . 70 Countries . 50 States . 1,078 Companies - 859 small businesses . 1,035 Universities & Nonprofit Entities - 3,340 principal investigators - 3,000 grad students 9 Total R&D Investment Growth 2% 2% EU 34% 24% 13% 4% 12% 2010 3% 1% 3% <1% $1.15T 1% ** OECD 2010 PPP; 2010 Global R&D Report (Battelle) +100% Growth in Global S&T Investment 2% 2% 1996 38% 4% 3% 28% 16% $0.5T 1% <1% 2% 3% 1% * UIS S&T database; World Bank - PPP data 10 The Serendipitous Nature of Basic Research • Progress enabling advanced technology products in information fields is built upon work of a few individuals who decades ago were investigating something called solid state physics – none of whom probably ever thought about cell phones, GPS, or iPods with 160,000 books in your pocket and now storage in the Cloud • iPhone has more computing power than the Apollo spacecraft • What is next …. Can we predict the breakthroughs a half century hence ONR-Global •Develop Partnerships •Leverage Global S&T Advances •Avoid Technology Surprise 12 US Defense Science Board on Basic Research Jan 2012 • Increasing fraction of world' s basic research is being conducted outside US as part of larger trend toward globalization of science. • In order to avoid tech surprise, it is important for DoD to be involved in cutting edge of basic research on topics of specific interest, whether cutting edge is in US or overseas • DoD should increase percentage of basic research funding that is invested internationally from 2.5 to 3 percent to 5 percent over next 2 years ONR Global History • 1946 – ONR Branch London Office created to survey, assess, and report on European S&T Activities • 1974 – ONR Tokyo Office opened to liaise and assess Asian S&T activities • 1977 – ONR European & Tokyo Offices combined to form International Field Office Edison House • 2003 – ONR Global: merger of Naval Fleet/Force Technology Innovation Office & International Field Office • 2004 – Branch office in Santiago, Chile, established • 2005 – Branch office in Singapore established • 2010 – Branch office in Prague established ONR Global Mission Statement Search globe for promising, emerging scientific research and advanced technologies to enable ONR to effectively address current needs of the Fleet/Force and investigate and assess revolutionary, high-payoff technologies for future Naval missions and capabilities. ONRG Science Program Tools Collaborative Science Program (CSP) – Support non-US workshops and CSP conferences of Naval interest Visiting Scientist Program (VSP) Liaison – Support travel of non-US scientists to US to NICOP socialize new S&T ideas or findings with Visit NRE Naval International Cooperative Opportunities Programs (NICOP) – Support insertion of innovative, NICOP international S&T into core ONR, NRE, & VSP DoD S&T Programs Proposal Liaison Visits (Not a Grant) – ONRG technical staff visit international ONRG provides seedling institutions to develop access and discover cutting edge S&T funding for innovative research 16 FY12 Collaborative Science Program Sweden Norway (1) $ 20,000 (1) $ 20,000 Germany Netherlands (6) $ 66,900 (1) $ 8,000 Denmark Russia United Kingdom Lithuania Poland (1) $ 7,500 (6) $ 51,000 (25) $377,787 (1) $ 5,000 (3) $ 35,000 Czech Republic Ireland (5) $ 101,719 Ukraine Belgium (1) $ 8,550 (3) $ 33,000 (1) $ 6,000 Austria France Switzerland (1) $ 10,000 (7) $ 51,333 (2) $ 15,000 Croatia Hungary Republic of Moldova USA Portugal (1) $ 5,000 (1) $ 10,000 (1) $ 8,500 (2) $ 35,000 (2) $ 13,400 Serbia Japan Spain Bulgaria (1) $ 14,000 (7) $40,000 (5) $ 51,590 Italy Greece (2) $ 10,000 (9) $ 130,700 (3) $ 46,306 Republic of Montenegro South Korea (6) $ 64,000 Mexico (1) $ 14,500 (2) $ 14,680 Panama (1) $ 5,000 Vietnam Thailand (4) $ 30,000 (5) $ 32,200 Ethopia India (1) $ 7,000 (10) $125,500 Malaysia Sri Lanka (2) $ 10,000 (1) $ 15,570 Brazil (4) $ 24,000 Singapore (6) $ 94,000 Australia (4) $ 45,000 South Africa Chile (2) $ 10,000 (3) $ 79,630 Argentina (1) $ 8,000 152 Events $1.76 Million Funding FY12 Visiting Scientist Program Sweden Norway (1) $ 2,340 (1) $ 5,341 Germany Netherlands (5) $ 15,588 (4) $ 13,287 Russia United Kingdom (3) $ 9,644 (9) $ 31,131 Czech Republic Cabada Ireland (4) $ 14,056 (2) $ 4,690 (1) $ 22,560 Hungary France (1) $ 2,289 (1) $ 3,600 Republic of Moldova (1) $ 2,500 Greece Georgia Italy (2) $ 9,090 (2) $ 5,800 (9) $ 28,754 Belize Israel (1) $ 1,1816 (1) $ 1,744 Mexico (2) $ 9,259 Costa Rica Vietnam (1) $ 1,865 Thailand (1) $ 470 (1) $ 2,175 India (3) $10,767 Brazil (4) $ 17,000 Singapore (1) $ 4,200 Australia (1) $ 4,064 New Zealand (1) $ 2,743 Chile (4) $ 15,500 68 Visits $194 Thousand Funding FY12 Naval International Cooperative Opportunities in S&T Program Netherlands Finland Germany (6) $ 491,072 Denmark (1) $ 105,000 (2) $ 130,662 Russia (1) $ 100,000 United Kingdom (1) $ 145,592 Poland (24) $2,038,126 (1) $ 100,202 Canada Ireland Czech Republic Ukraine Belgium (2) $ 167,000 (2) $ 80,700 (8) $ 567,500 (2) $ 34,000 (1) $ 39,675 France Romania (1) $ 30,000 (5) $ 360,331 Switzerland Croatia (2) $ 282,860 Portugal (2) $ 110,000 (1) $ 21,955 Japan Greece (10) $ 1,029,530 Spain Bulgaria Italy Macedonia (1) $ 42,000 (3) $ 271,595 (1) $ 34,000 97) $ 635,396 (1) $ 30,000 South Korea (1) $ 150,000 Taiwan (2) $ 64,000 Bangledesh (1) $ 38,600 Philippines India (2) $ 262,715 (1) $ 35,160 Vietnam (2) $ 60,000 Brazil (2) $ 140,000 Singapore (4) $ 444,000 Australia (8) $ 727,880 New Zealand (4) $ 207,318 Chile (4) $ 247,100 120 Grants $9.3 Million Funding Making Global Connections Where to Find Us Online www.onr.navy.mil 21 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • S&T in Support of the Navy and US Marine Corps Dr. Lawrence
    S&T in Support of the Navy and US Marine Corps Dr. Lawrence Schuette Director of Research [email protected] The Office of Naval Research The S&T Provider for the Navy and Marine Corps • 4,000+ People • 23 Locations • $2.1B / year • >1,000 Partners Discover Dist ribu Develop Technological tion Stat Deliver Advantage em ent A: App2 rov ed for publ ic rele ase Warfighting Capabilities Enabled by S&T Investments Broad 5-20 years Discovery & Invention 4-8 years (Basic and Applied Leap Ahead Science) 2-4 years Focus Innovations (Innovative Naval Technology Prototypes) Maturation ≈ 12% ≈ 45% 1-2 years (FNCs, etc) Quick Reaction & Other S&T ≈ 8% ≈ 30% Narrow Current Fleet/Force Fleet/Force in Development Future Fleet/Force Dist ribu tion Stat em ent A: App3 rov ed for publ ic rele ase ONR Organization Chief of Naval Research N84M NRL ACNR AVCNR Exec. Director Vice Chief of PMR -51 ONRG Naval Research BIZOPS Comptroller Code 30 Code 31 Code 32 Code 33 Code 34 Code 35 Expeditionary Ocean Sea Warfare Warfighter Naval Air Warfare C4ISR Battlespace & Weapons Performance Warfare Sensing & Weapons Office of Discovery & Invention • Education Programs Research (03R) SwampWorks Office of Transition Products • Disruptive Technologies Technology (03T) SBIR • Affordability Initiatives DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release Global & Fleet Engagement London Prague Newport San ONR HQ DC Tokyo Norfolk Naples Yokosuka Diego LeJeune Okinawa Mayport Bahrain Hawaii Singapore São Paulo Santiago ONR Global Offices ONR Science Advisor Locations Countries with ONR funded research We execute $2B/year with the Naval S&T community in the US and 54 countries DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Office of Naval Research – University Science and Technology
    The Office of Naval Research – University Science and Technology - Reginald G. Williams, PhD Office of Naval Research January 2018 Distribution A. Approved for Public Release DCN#: 43-3532-18 The Office of Naval Research The S&T Provider for the Navy and Marine Corps • 4,000+ People • 23 Locations • $2.1B / year • >1,000 Partners Discover Develop Technological Deliver Advantage Distribution A. Approved for Public Release DCN#: 43-3532-18 2 Partnering with the S&T Community Government Academia Industry 1000 Universities/Colleges Small/Medium/Large Domestic/International Companies Distribution A. Approved for Public Release DCN#: 43-3532-18 3 ONR Workforce Civilian Employees - 3036 Military Personnel - 111 Nearly 1022 PhDs Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA) - 10 More than 515 Master’s Degrees Detailees - 90 160 Fellows Contractors - 501 Scientists & Engineers (S&E) Aerospace Engineering Engineering Research Psychologist Oceanographer Astrophysicist Research Biologist Physical Scientist Chemical Engineer Physiologist Physicist Computational Research Linguist Geologist Research Biologist Computer Engineer Materials Research Engineer Research Chemist Computer Scientist Mathematician Social Scientist Electrical Engineer Mechanical Engineer Electronics Engineer Metallurgist Administrative/Non-S&E positions Accounting Budget Financial Management Analyst Contract Specialist Grants Specialist General Law & Patent Attorneys Human Resources Management & Program Analyst Public Affairs Safety Security, Supply Administrative Officers Technical
    [Show full text]
  • Records, 1957-1963
    Records, 1957-1963 Finding aid prepared by Smithsonian Institution Archives Smithsonian Institution Archives Washington, D.C. Contact us at [email protected] Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Historical Note.................................................................................................................. 1 Descriptive Entry.............................................................................................................. 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 2 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 3 Records https://siarchives.si.edu/collections/siris_arc_216759 Collection Overview Repository: Smithsonian Institution Archives, Washington, D.C., [email protected] Title: Records Identifier: Record Unit 179 Date: 1957-1963 Extent: 3 cu. ft. (3 record storage boxes) Creator:: Smithsonian Institution. Research Group in Psychology and the Social Sciences Language: English Administrative Information Prefered Citation Smithsonian Institution Archives, Record Unit 179, Smithsonian Institution, Research Group in Psychology and the Social Sciences, Records Historical Note In 1959, the Smithsonian Institution established the
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Lasers, Railgun, and Hypervelocity Projectile: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Lasers, Railgun, and Hypervelocity Projectile: Background and Issues for Congress Ronald O'Rourke Specialist in Naval Affairs March 18, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44175 Navy Lasers, Railgun, and Hypervelocity Projectile: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The Navy is currently developing three potential new weapons that could improve the ability of its surface ships to defend themselves against enemy missiles—solid state lasers (SSLs), the electromagnetic railgun (EMRG), and the hypervelocity projectile (HVP). Any one of these new weapon technologies, if successfully developed and deployed, might be regarded as a “game changer” for defending Navy surface ships against enemy missiles. If two or three of them are successfully developed and deployed, the result might be considered not just a game changer, but a revolution. Rarely has the Navy had so many potential new types of surface- ship missile-defense weapons simultaneously available for development and potential deployment. Although the Navy in recent years has made considerable progress in developing SSLs, EMRG, and HVP, a number of significant development challenges remain. Overcoming these challenges will likely require years of additional development work, and ultimate success in overcoming them is not guaranteed. The issue for Congress is whether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy’s funding requests and proposed acquisition strategies for these three potential new weapons. Potential oversight questions for Congress include the following:
    [Show full text]
  • The Office of Naval Research - Science and Technology in Support of the US Navy and Marine Corps
    The Office of Naval Research - Science and Technology in Support of the US Navy and Marine Corps Dr. Joan S. Cleveland Deputy Chief Scientist [email protected] Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release The Naval Research Enterprise ONR HQ ONR Global NRL 4,000+ People 23 Locations $2.1B / year >1,000 Partners Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release 2 Partnering with the S&T Community Government Academia Industry 1000 Universities/Colleges Small/Medium/Large Domestic/International Companies Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release 3 ONR Global Washington, D.C. Region / ONR HQ ONR Global Headquarters London ONR Global Arlington Commanding Officer Executive Officer Technical Director International S&T Engagement Advisors Science Directors FCC/C10F N81 ONR Global Prague Science Director San Diego ONR Global Tokyo C3F Science Directors AIRFOR SURFOR Norfolk Bahrain I MEF Mayport FLTFOR NAVCENT/C5F UWDC C4F SUBFOR Naples SMWDC MARFORCOM NAVIFOR NAVAF/NAVEUR/ Yokosuka SPECWAR C6F C7F Camp LeJeune Hawaii NECC Okinawa II MEF PACOM NWDC III MEF PACFLT India MARFORPAC ONR Global Singapore ONR Global São Paulo Sceince Directors ONR Global Santiago Science Directors Science Director Science Directors • London • Prague Science Advisors • Tokyo Joint Command • Santiago Navy Command • Singapore Marine Corps Command • Sao Paulo ONR’s Global Offices are t h e Bridge to International Partnership; Naval R&D Diplomacy in More than 60 C o u n t r i e s Distribution Statement A: Approved for
    [Show full text]
  • Happy Independence
    UPDATE NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL POSTGRADUATE NAVAL DCNO for Warfighting Development Honors NPS Graduates During In-Person Ceremony By MC3 James Norket For the first time in more than a year, the Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) celebrated a graduating class in person during a graduation ceremony for its Spring Quarter graduates, June 18, honoring and recognizing their remarkable achievements and resiliency. While these graduates mostly completed their education in a remote learning environment, during their time at NPS they were able to effectively adapt to overcome the adversity. NPS President retired Vice Adm. Ann E. Rondeau addressed the graduating class praising them for their resilience during a global pandemic. “As we reflect on what 2020 was like, this pandemic may have had the closest thing to the effects of what the Great Depression did, it forced on us separation and disassociation,” said Rondeau. “And there was this extraordinary thing that happened in that virtually there was great learning going on, and you met the expectation of the mission. At NPS, we are you. We are military leaders, educators and staff serving those who serve our nation and serving each other. Together we solve hard problems and create solutions. You are the decisive advantage that we deliver. We are you. And that’s the magic of NPS.” Commencement speaker, Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfighting Development (N7) Vice NPS Adm. Jeff Hughes, congratulated the 364 graduates, including 23 international students from 15 countries, conveying how the nation’s warfighting advantage in the era of Great Power Competition will hinge on intellectual capital and technological innovation driving solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • DOE and DOD Funding
    Mentoring Research on Getting Funding from the Departments of Energy (DOE) and Defense (DOD) Panelists Dion Vlochos, [email protected] Yushan Yan, [email protected] LJ Holmes, [email protected] Mark Mirotznik, [email protected] An Overview of DOE Programs and Successful Proposal Submission Dion Vlachos and Yushan Yan An Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Sciences ccei.udel.edu DOE Organizational Chart ARPA-E Office of Fossil Science Energy Office of AI EERE AMO ccei.udel.edu Important Programs AMO ccei.udel.edu BES • https://www.energy.gov/science/bes/basic-energy-sciences ccei.udel.edu ccei.udel.edu ccei.udel.edu DOE Roadmaps and Factual Documents • DOE has roadmaps for most areas – These reports should be studied carefully so a proposal is relevant to what they are interested in; a section on how your proposal fits in should be written – (2016) Check out this site: • Factual Documents ccei.udel.edu Proposals Should Address Relevance to DOE • Cite DOE reports and relate your work to them • Confidential to adapt for your proposal ccei.udel.edu Deadlines/Solicitations • Regular submissions are typically in October • Solicitations happen throughout the year but more so early in the calendar year; many proposals due by March/April • DEI sends info on solicitations • You can register on the DOE website and monitor the solicitations • DOE has fast turnaround from solicitation announcement to proposal submission • Some of the programs, e.g., EERE, ARPA-E, etc. send reviews back and expect us
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Statement Chris Fall Nominee to Be Director of the Office of Science at the Department of Energy Nomination Hearing U.S
    Opening Statement Chris Fall Nominee to be Director of the Office of Science at the Department of Energy Nomination Hearing U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources June 26, 2017 Chairman Murkowski, Ranking Member Cantwell, and Members of the Committee: Thank you for the opportunity to appear before you as the nominee to be the Director of the Office of Science at the Department of Energy. I would also like to thank the President and Secretary Perry for their trust and confidence in nominating me. I am deeply honored to be considered for this position assisting the Secretary in the leadership of what I believe to be the world’s pre-eminent science enterprise. Please allow me to introduce to you my family from across the river in Arlington. My wife, Dr. Sandra Wilkniss, may be familiar to some of you from her time as staff for Senator Heinrich and Senator Bingaman before that. She is joined by our daughter Alex and our son Leo. I believe that some of my current and former colleagues are here and I appreciate their support. Sandra and I came to Washington just about eight years ago from Academia to do one year science policy fellowships, and I had the great fortune to land at the Office of Naval Research to work on innovation strategies. The Navy cleverly convinced me to stay longer with a remarkable trip to an aircraft carrier at sea, and I moved on to run the international liaison office, to be the deputy director of research for STEM and Workforce programs, and most recently to briefly manage the Navy’s basic research portfolio and to be the acting Chief Scientist.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Study Report
    Operations Research Department Naval Postgraduate School Academic Program Review Introduction and Executive Summary July 2016 Operations Research Department Naval Postgraduate School Academic Program Review Part 1: Self-Study Report July 2016 Table of Contents 1. Mission / Strategy / Organization ................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Faculty ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 3. Research and Scholarship ................................................................................................................................................. 4 4. Education Programs ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 5. Students ................................................................................................................................................................................. 14 6. Resources ............................................................................................................................................................................. 17 7. Assessment and Review ................................................................................................................................................. 19 1. Mission / Strategy
    [Show full text]
  • GRADUATE DEGREE ENROLLMENT All Degrees by Curricula – Average on Board 2019
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MISSION The Naval Postgraduate School provides relevant and unique advanced education and research programs to increase the combat effectiveness of commissioned officers of the naval service to enhance the security of the United States. In support of the foregoing and to sustain academic excellence, NPS will foster a program of relevant and meritorious thesis and research experiences for NPS students that informs the curricula, supports the needs of Navy and Department of Defense, and builds the in- tellectual capital of NPS faculty. To support the core Navy mission, NPS’ programs are inherently joint, interagency, and international. NPSQUICK GRADU FACTSATE ACADEMICEDUCATION YEARPROGRAMS 2019 2019-202017 ACADEMIC Academic PROGRAMS programs ANNUAL annual FACTBOOK factbook 2016 NPS QUICK FACTS ORGANIZATIONLeadership LEADERSHIP FACULTYFaculty & STAFF & Staff President:President: Vice Vice Admiral Admiral Ann Ronald E. Rondeau, A. Route, USN USN(Ret) (Ret) 227 223 Tenure Tenure Track FacultyTrack Faculty Provost:Provost: Dr. Dr. Steven Steven R.R. Lerman 347 382 Non-TenureNon-Tenure Track FacultyTrack Faculty ViceChief Provost: of Staff: Dr. CAPT Douglas Phil Old, Moses USN 42 51 Military Military Faculty Faculty ChiefDean of of Staff: Students: Capt. CAPT Anthony Markus J. J.Parisi, Gudmundsson, USN USN 338 345 GS/Wage GS/Wage Grade Gradestaff members staff members DeanDean of of Students: GSDM: Dr. Capt.Keith Snider Matthew R. Vandersluis, USN DeanDean of of GSBPP: GSEAS: Dr. Dr. ClydeWilliam Scandrett Gates RESEARCH DeanDean of of GSEAS: GSOIS: Dr. Rob Clyde Dell Scandrett • Approx $100 million in sponsored research funding Dean of SIGS: Dr. James Wirtz Dean of GSOIS: Dr. Gordon McCormick •RResearchesearch programs are aligned to NPS curricula Dean of Research: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Agency (DOD) Program Charts Feb 2019
    Index to Charts: Guide to Defense Basic Research Funding Chart #s Topic 1 - 2 Contents 3 - 22 Overview Perspectives, including suggestions on working with DOD Program Officers 23 - 38 By Academic Disciplines 39 - 45 Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) 46 - 54 Army Research Office (ARO) 55 Army Corp of Engineers 56 - 59 Army Medical Research and Materials Command (AMRMC) 60 Army Research Institute for Behavioral and Social Science (ARI) 61 - 74 Office of Naval Research (ONR) 75 - 76 Naval Post-Graduate School (NPSG) 77 - 109 Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) 110 - 113 Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) 114 High Performance Computing 115 MINERVA (social science) 116 - 119 University Research Initiative (URI, including MURI, DURIP, NDSEG) 120 - 122 Defense Medical Research and Development Program (DMRDP) 123 - 130 Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (CDMRP) 131 US Department of Veterans Affairs 132 University Affiliated Research Centers 133 - 139 Young Investigator / Early Career 140 - 141 Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellow (was NSSEFF) 142 DOD I-Corps 143 Defense Sciences Study Group (DSSG) 144 STEM Education - SMART !1 Revised Jul 2019 Index to Charts: Guidance to Defense Selected Applied Research and Exploratory Development Funding Chart #s Topic 145- 149 Applied Research and Advanced Technology Development 150 - 154 Air Force Materiel Command 155 Air Force Academy 156 - 166 Army Materiel Command 167 US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 168 - 172 Naval Research - Applied Research and Adv Technol 173
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Science in the United States: an Encyclopedia
    The History of Science in the United States An Encyclopedia Edited by Marc Rothenberg Smithsonian Institution Garland Publishing, Inc. New York & London 2001 O Office routine work and admiralty exploring expe- government science such as fisheries research as well as ditions, marine science centered around the British private projects, so oceanographic work, which was Association for the Advancement of Science Dredging particularly expensive, slowed down dramatically until Committee from 1839 until the mid-1860s, after preparations began for World War II. which time a Royal Society-admiralty partnership took As with other sciences, World War II partnerships over the lead and dispatched a series of summer expedi- helped forge a new relationship between governments tions. These culminated in the four-year circumnav- and oceanography. Oceanographic work during and igation of HMS Challenger (1872–1876), the first after the war carried the imprint of wartime govern- expedition sent out with a mandate to study the world’s ment support and policy in both its problem selection oceans. Both the United States and Britain quickly fol- and its scale. Physical studies gained and maintained lowed the example of the Naples Zoological Station precedence over biological ones. The areas of inquiry and set up coastal marine biological laboratories in the promoted by wartime efforts related to submarine and 1880s and 1890s. antisubmarine tactics. New research began on under- In the last quarter of the nineteenth century, many water acoustics, while ocean floor sediment charts were nations sponsored oceanographic voyages modeled compiled from existing data. Wave studies also received after the Challenger’s. The United States, Russia, Ger- precedence for their value in predicting surf conditions many, Norway, France, and Italy contributed to the for landings.
    [Show full text]