DOCSLIB.ORG

DOE and DOD Funding

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DOE and DOD Funding Mentoring Research on Getting Funding from the Departments of Energy (DOE) and Defense (DOD) Panelists Dion Vlochos, [email protected] Yushan Yan, [email protected] LJ Holmes, [email protected] Mark Mirotznik, [email protected] An Overview of DOE Programs and Successful Proposal Submission Dion Vlachos and Yushan Yan An Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Sciences ccei.udel.edu DOE Organizational Chart ARPA-E Office of Fossil Science Energy Office of AI EERE AMO ccei.udel.edu Important Programs AMO ccei.udel.edu BES • https://www.energy.gov/science/bes/basic-energy-sciences ccei.udel.edu ccei.udel.edu ccei.udel.edu DOE Roadmaps and Factual Documents • DOE has roadmaps for most areas – These reports should be studied carefully so a proposal is relevant to what they are interested in; a section on how your proposal fits in should be written – (2016) Check out this site: • Factual Documents ccei.udel.edu Proposals Should Address Relevance to DOE • Cite DOE reports and relate your work to them • Confidential to adapt for your proposal ccei.udel.edu Deadlines/Solicitations • Regular submissions are typically in October • Solicitations happen throughout the year but more so early in the calendar year; many proposals due by March/April • DEI sends info on solicitations • You can register on the DOE website and monitor the solicitations • DOE has fast turnaround from solicitation announcement to proposal submission • Some of the programs, e.g., EERE, ARPA-E, etc. send reviews back and expect us to address these within 48 hours ccei.udel.edu Submitting a Proposal to the Regular Program • Volunteer to participate in panel review by contacting the program manager (this applies also to NSF) • Do your homework in positioning your idea to future directions of DOE • Contact the program manager and pitch your idea – This may take a few iterations – You may be invited to submit a white paper ccei.udel.edu Developing Partnerships with National Labs ccei.udel.edu A FOA and A Good Proposal • Focused FOA – DOE specifies a problem and tells us where it wanted us to be – Our job is to tell DOE where we are and how we can get to where it wanted us to be • OPEN FOA (arpa-e every 3 yrs) – We tell DOE where we should be and why – Then we tell DOE where we are and how we can get to where we should be • Both cases – It is important that we provide arguments that are quantitative and numerical – A path to commercialization is also appreciated ▪ It is required for ARPA-E ccei.udel.edu How to get into the DOE community • This is my personal story (PhD in zeolite membranes and zero electrochemistry/energy) – Start with a good reading of the relevant mega trends – Develop a good idea that you are in reasonable position to pursue (it is ok to have gaps) – Approach someone who has an established track record with DOE community, especially the ones inside the labs, and who can fill your gaps – Share ideas to test excitement and get feedback and propose together if feasible – Can be mutually beneficial ▪ They learn new ideas ▪ I get educated in electrochemistry ▪ I get my gaps filled ▪ All of the people I got to work with early in my career are still friends today, after ~20 yrs; I can claim that I self taught myself electrochem or I was taught by them and my own students and postdocs • Good idea + persistence = win • It is totally feasible to start with a brand new area of research ccei.udel.edu ARPA-E/EERE proposal steps • RFI • FOA – Focused FOA ▪ DOE specifies a problem and tells us where it wanted us to be – OPEN FOA (only for ARPA-E) ▪ We tell DOE where we should be and why • Concept Paper (4 pp including 1 p for data) – Mostly prescribed sections to fill • Full Proposal – Mostly prescribed sections to fill • Award • Contract Negotiations – Detailed milestone negotiations ▪ This has real consequences in getting funding in all phases – Budget negotiations ccei.udel.edu The Department of Defense (DOD) is pretty huge!! ❑1.4 million active duty, 1.1 million reservists and 450,000 civil servants. ❑$13 billion each year (or 2% of the total annual budget) spent on basic (6.1 funding) , applied research (6.2 funding) and technology development (6.3 funding). As a comparison NSF budget is $7.8 billion and the NIH budget is $41.5 billion. Primary Secondary Primary DoD Organizations for External Funding Army research office (ARO) Combat Capabilities Development Centers (CCDCs) Army https://www.arl.army.mil/who-we-are/aro/ ❑ Army Research Laboratory (ARL, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, …) ❑ C5ISR (formally CERDEC) ❑ Armaments Research Center (formally ARDEC) ❑ Ground Vehicle Systems Center (formally TARDEC) ❑ Chem. Bio Center(formally ECBC) ❑ Soldier Systems Center (formally NSRDEC) ❑ Aviation & Missile Research Center (formally AMADEC) Office of Naval Research (ONR) Research and Development Labs and Warfare Centers Navy https://www.onr.navy.mil/ ❑ Naval research laboratory (NRL) ❑ Naval surface warfare centers (NSWC, Carderock, Crain, Dohlgren, Philly) ❑ Naval underwater warfare center (NUWC) ❑ Naval Information Warfare Systems Command (formally SPAWAR) Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) Research and Development Labs Air Force https://www.wpafb.af.mil/afrl/afosr/ ❑ Air Force research laboratory (AFRL) ❑ Air Force Materiel Command Research Centers ❑ Air Force Life Cycle Management Centers (Aero Armament, Electronic Human, Aircraft Combat) Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency ❑ Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) Others (DARPA) ❑ Missile Defense Agency (MDA) ❑ Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) https://www.darpa.mil/ ❑ National Reconnaissance Office ❑ Acquisition Resource Center (NSA Research) National Security Agency (NSA) Example Research Programs in the DoD Broad Agency Announcements ❑ The defense agencies announce funding opportunities in a variety of ways, including Broad Agency Announcements (BAAs). Each agency typically issues a “Long Range BAA,” which outlines technical research interests and priorities of the agency over a several- (BAAs) year range, as well as targeted BAAs, which address more specific competitions, and other targeted solicitations. University research is often funded through unsolicited proposals based on the Long Range BAA. Young investigator awards ❑ ONR Young Investigator Program (YIP): https://www.onr.navy.mil/en/Education-Outreach/Sponsored-Research/YIP ❑ AFOSR Young Investigator Program (YIP): (https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/view-opportunity.html?oppId=313523) ❑ ARO Young Investigator Program (YIP): (https://www.aro.org/aro-young-investigator-award) ❑ DARPA Young Faculty Award : (https://www.darpa.mil/work-with-us/for-universities/young-faculty-award) Program Officer’s Individual ❑ All DoD program officers at ARO, ONR, AFOSR and DARPA have S&T budgets that they can use to fund various projects. They fund these through their long range BAAs. Science and Technology Programs ❑ Budgets vary considerably depending on the particular program manager. (S&T) ❑ Funding decisions are primarily made by the program officers themselves. ❑ Potentially great opportunity for long term funding Multidisciplinary University Research ❑ University teams work on fundamental research projects (6.1) for 3-5 years ❑ $1.25M-1.5M per year Initiative (MURI) ❑ Topic areas and calls for proposals come out once per year Defense University Research ❑ ~$50M per year for the purchase of major equipment <$1M ❑ Equipment is intended to benefit current DoD programs. Instrumentation Program (DURIP) ❑ Need to have buy-in from program manager Small Business Innovation Program ❑ Must work with small business (<500 employees) ❑ Phase I: 6-9 months $100k-150k (SBIR) and Small Business Technology ❑ Phase II: 24 months $1M-1.2M Transfer Program (STTR) ❑ STTRs must send 30% to university partner ❑ SBIR PIs must work 51% with company ❑ STTR PIs can be university professor ❑ Topic calls come out a few times per year (https://www.sbir.gov) Some Tricks I Have Learned Over Time ❑ Don’t be shy! Program Officers in the various DoD agencies are given a large amount of discretion in making funding decisions. Having a relationship with the Program Officer is extremely important to potential applicants. Establishing a relationship with a Program Officer is usually not difficult; they are often receptive to phone calls and e-mails and are usually happy to discuss a potential applicants’ research and whether it fits into the agency’s needs; they also attend professional conferences on research topics of interest to their organizations. ❑ Do your homework about the various research and development programs. All of the Department of Defense agencies are highly mission-oriented. The missions of AFOSR, ONR and ARO are related to the management of research that supports the goals and operations of their respective services (Air Force, Navy and Army, respectively). DARPA’s mission is to oversee high risk, high pay-off research that has the potential to significantly benefit any of the DoD’s branches. These DoD agencies therefore are looking for research that has a close connection to defense, and particular technologies and problems of interest. Do not try to sell them on what you want to do! Try to sell them on why what you do will help solve their problems..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • S&T in Support of the Navy and US Marine Corps Dr. Lawrence
    S&T in Support of the Navy and US Marine Corps Dr. Lawrence Schuette Director of Research [email protected] The Office of Naval Research The S&T Provider for the Navy and Marine Corps • 4,000+ People • 23 Locations • $2.1B / year • >1,000 Partners Discover Dist ribu Develop Technological tion Stat Deliver Advantage em ent A: App2 rov ed for publ ic rele ase Warfighting Capabilities Enabled by S&T Investments Broad 5-20 years Discovery & Invention 4-8 years (Basic and Applied Leap Ahead Science) 2-4 years Focus Innovations (Innovative Naval Technology Prototypes) Maturation ≈ 12% ≈ 45% 1-2 years (FNCs, etc) Quick Reaction & Other S&T ≈ 8% ≈ 30% Narrow Current Fleet/Force Fleet/Force in Development Future Fleet/Force Dist ribu tion Stat em ent A: App3 rov ed for publ ic rele ase ONR Organization Chief of Naval Research N84M NRL ACNR AVCNR Exec. Director Vice Chief of PMR -51 ONRG Naval Research BIZOPS Comptroller Code 30 Code 31 Code 32 Code 33 Code 34 Code 35 Expeditionary Ocean Sea Warfare Warfighter Naval Air Warfare C4ISR Battlespace & Weapons Performance Warfare Sensing & Weapons Office of Discovery & Invention • Education Programs Research (03R) SwampWorks Office of Transition Products • Disruptive Technologies Technology (03T) SBIR • Affordability Initiatives DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release Global & Fleet Engagement London Prague Newport San ONR HQ DC Tokyo Norfolk Naples Yokosuka Diego LeJeune Okinawa Mayport Bahrain Hawaii Singapore São Paulo Santiago ONR Global Offices ONR Science Advisor Locations Countries with ONR funded research We execute $2B/year with the Naval S&T community in the US and 54 countries DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Office of Naval Research – University Science and Technology
    The Office of Naval Research – University Science and Technology - Reginald G. Williams, PhD Office of Naval Research January 2018 Distribution A. Approved for Public Release DCN#: 43-3532-18 The Office of Naval Research The S&T Provider for the Navy and Marine Corps • 4,000+ People • 23 Locations • $2.1B / year • >1,000 Partners Discover Develop Technological Deliver Advantage Distribution A. Approved for Public Release DCN#: 43-3532-18 2 Partnering with the S&T Community Government Academia Industry 1000 Universities/Colleges Small/Medium/Large Domestic/International Companies Distribution A. Approved for Public Release DCN#: 43-3532-18 3 ONR Workforce Civilian Employees - 3036 Military Personnel - 111 Nearly 1022 PhDs Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA) - 10 More than 515 Master’s Degrees Detailees - 90 160 Fellows Contractors - 501 Scientists & Engineers (S&E) Aerospace Engineering Engineering Research Psychologist Oceanographer Astrophysicist Research Biologist Physical Scientist Chemical Engineer Physiologist Physicist Computational Research Linguist Geologist Research Biologist Computer Engineer Materials Research Engineer Research Chemist Computer Scientist Mathematician Social Scientist Electrical Engineer Mechanical Engineer Electronics Engineer Metallurgist Administrative/Non-S&E positions Accounting Budget Financial Management Analyst Contract Specialist Grants Specialist General Law & Patent Attorneys Human Resources Management & Program Analyst Public Affairs Safety Security, Supply Administrative Officers Technical
    [Show full text]
  • Records, 1957-1963
    Records, 1957-1963 Finding aid prepared by Smithsonian Institution Archives Smithsonian Institution Archives Washington, D.C. Contact us at [email protected] Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Historical Note.................................................................................................................. 1 Descriptive Entry.............................................................................................................. 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 2 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 3 Records https://siarchives.si.edu/collections/siris_arc_216759 Collection Overview Repository: Smithsonian Institution Archives, Washington, D.C., [email protected] Title: Records Identifier: Record Unit 179 Date: 1957-1963 Extent: 3 cu. ft. (3 record storage boxes) Creator:: Smithsonian Institution. Research Group in Psychology and the Social Sciences Language: English Administrative Information Prefered Citation Smithsonian Institution Archives, Record Unit 179, Smithsonian Institution, Research Group in Psychology and the Social Sciences, Records Historical Note In 1959, the Smithsonian Institution established the
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Lasers, Railgun, and Hypervelocity Projectile: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Lasers, Railgun, and Hypervelocity Projectile: Background and Issues for Congress Ronald O'Rourke Specialist in Naval Affairs March 18, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44175 Navy Lasers, Railgun, and Hypervelocity Projectile: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The Navy is currently developing three potential new weapons that could improve the ability of its surface ships to defend themselves against enemy missiles—solid state lasers (SSLs), the electromagnetic railgun (EMRG), and the hypervelocity projectile (HVP). Any one of these new weapon technologies, if successfully developed and deployed, might be regarded as a “game changer” for defending Navy surface ships against enemy missiles. If two or three of them are successfully developed and deployed, the result might be considered not just a game changer, but a revolution. Rarely has the Navy had so many potential new types of surface- ship missile-defense weapons simultaneously available for development and potential deployment. Although the Navy in recent years has made considerable progress in developing SSLs, EMRG, and HVP, a number of significant development challenges remain. Overcoming these challenges will likely require years of additional development work, and ultimate success in overcoming them is not guaranteed. The issue for Congress is whether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy’s funding requests and proposed acquisition strategies for these three potential new weapons. Potential oversight questions for Congress include the following:
    [Show full text]
  • The Office of Naval Research - Science and Technology in Support of the US Navy and Marine Corps
    The Office of Naval Research - Science and Technology in Support of the US Navy and Marine Corps Dr. Joan S. Cleveland Deputy Chief Scientist [email protected] Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release The Naval Research Enterprise ONR HQ ONR Global NRL 4,000+ People 23 Locations $2.1B / year >1,000 Partners Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release 2 Partnering with the S&T Community Government Academia Industry 1000 Universities/Colleges Small/Medium/Large Domestic/International Companies Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release 3 ONR Global Washington, D.C. Region / ONR HQ ONR Global Headquarters London ONR Global Arlington Commanding Officer Executive Officer Technical Director International S&T Engagement Advisors Science Directors FCC/C10F N81 ONR Global Prague Science Director San Diego ONR Global Tokyo C3F Science Directors AIRFOR SURFOR Norfolk Bahrain I MEF Mayport FLTFOR NAVCENT/C5F UWDC C4F SUBFOR Naples SMWDC MARFORCOM NAVIFOR NAVAF/NAVEUR/ Yokosuka SPECWAR C6F C7F Camp LeJeune Hawaii NECC Okinawa II MEF PACOM NWDC III MEF PACFLT India MARFORPAC ONR Global Singapore ONR Global São Paulo Sceince Directors ONR Global Santiago Science Directors Science Director Science Directors • London • Prague Science Advisors • Tokyo Joint Command • Santiago Navy Command • Singapore Marine Corps Command • Sao Paulo ONR’s Global Offices are t h e Bridge to International Partnership; Naval R&D Diplomacy in More than 60 C o u n t r i e s Distribution Statement A: Approved for
    [Show full text]
  • Happy Independence
    UPDATE NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL POSTGRADUATE NAVAL DCNO for Warfighting Development Honors NPS Graduates During In-Person Ceremony By MC3 James Norket For the first time in more than a year, the Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) celebrated a graduating class in person during a graduation ceremony for its Spring Quarter graduates, June 18, honoring and recognizing their remarkable achievements and resiliency. While these graduates mostly completed their education in a remote learning environment, during their time at NPS they were able to effectively adapt to overcome the adversity. NPS President retired Vice Adm. Ann E. Rondeau addressed the graduating class praising them for their resilience during a global pandemic. “As we reflect on what 2020 was like, this pandemic may have had the closest thing to the effects of what the Great Depression did, it forced on us separation and disassociation,” said Rondeau. “And there was this extraordinary thing that happened in that virtually there was great learning going on, and you met the expectation of the mission. At NPS, we are you. We are military leaders, educators and staff serving those who serve our nation and serving each other. Together we solve hard problems and create solutions. You are the decisive advantage that we deliver. We are you. And that’s the magic of NPS.” Commencement speaker, Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfighting Development (N7) Vice NPS Adm. Jeff Hughes, congratulated the 364 graduates, including 23 international students from 15 countries, conveying how the nation’s warfighting advantage in the era of Great Power Competition will hinge on intellectual capital and technological innovation driving solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Statement Chris Fall Nominee to Be Director of the Office of Science at the Department of Energy Nomination Hearing U.S
    Opening Statement Chris Fall Nominee to be Director of the Office of Science at the Department of Energy Nomination Hearing U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources June 26, 2017 Chairman Murkowski, Ranking Member Cantwell, and Members of the Committee: Thank you for the opportunity to appear before you as the nominee to be the Director of the Office of Science at the Department of Energy. I would also like to thank the President and Secretary Perry for their trust and confidence in nominating me. I am deeply honored to be considered for this position assisting the Secretary in the leadership of what I believe to be the world’s pre-eminent science enterprise. Please allow me to introduce to you my family from across the river in Arlington. My wife, Dr. Sandra Wilkniss, may be familiar to some of you from her time as staff for Senator Heinrich and Senator Bingaman before that. She is joined by our daughter Alex and our son Leo. I believe that some of my current and former colleagues are here and I appreciate their support. Sandra and I came to Washington just about eight years ago from Academia to do one year science policy fellowships, and I had the great fortune to land at the Office of Naval Research to work on innovation strategies. The Navy cleverly convinced me to stay longer with a remarkable trip to an aircraft carrier at sea, and I moved on to run the international liaison office, to be the deputy director of research for STEM and Workforce programs, and most recently to briefly manage the Navy’s basic research portfolio and to be the acting Chief Scientist.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Study Report
    Operations Research Department Naval Postgraduate School Academic Program Review Introduction and Executive Summary July 2016 Operations Research Department Naval Postgraduate School Academic Program Review Part 1: Self-Study Report July 2016 Table of Contents 1. Mission / Strategy / Organization ................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Faculty ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 3. Research and Scholarship ................................................................................................................................................. 4 4. Education Programs ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 5. Students ................................................................................................................................................................................. 14 6. Resources ............................................................................................................................................................................. 17 7. Assessment and Review ................................................................................................................................................. 19 1. Mission / Strategy
    [Show full text]
  • GRADUATE DEGREE ENROLLMENT All Degrees by Curricula – Average on Board 2019
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MISSION The Naval Postgraduate School provides relevant and unique advanced education and research programs to increase the combat effectiveness of commissioned officers of the naval service to enhance the security of the United States. In support of the foregoing and to sustain academic excellence, NPS will foster a program of relevant and meritorious thesis and research experiences for NPS students that informs the curricula, supports the needs of Navy and Department of Defense, and builds the in- tellectual capital of NPS faculty. To support the core Navy mission, NPS’ programs are inherently joint, interagency, and international. NPSQUICK GRADU FACTSATE ACADEMICEDUCATION YEARPROGRAMS 2019 2019-202017 ACADEMIC Academic PROGRAMS programs ANNUAL annual FACTBOOK factbook 2016 NPS QUICK FACTS ORGANIZATIONLeadership LEADERSHIP FACULTYFaculty & STAFF & Staff President:President: Vice Vice Admiral Admiral Ann Ronald E. Rondeau, A. Route, USN USN(Ret) (Ret) 227 223 Tenure Tenure Track FacultyTrack Faculty Provost:Provost: Dr. Dr. Steven Steven R.R. Lerman 347 382 Non-TenureNon-Tenure Track FacultyTrack Faculty ViceChief Provost: of Staff: Dr. CAPT Douglas Phil Old, Moses USN 42 51 Military Military Faculty Faculty ChiefDean of of Staff: Students: Capt. CAPT Anthony Markus J. J.Parisi, Gudmundsson, USN USN 338 345 GS/Wage GS/Wage Grade Gradestaff members staff members DeanDean of of Students: GSDM: Dr. Capt.Keith Snider Matthew R. Vandersluis, USN DeanDean of of GSBPP: GSEAS: Dr. Dr. ClydeWilliam Scandrett Gates RESEARCH DeanDean of of GSEAS: GSOIS: Dr. Rob Clyde Dell Scandrett • Approx $100 million in sponsored research funding Dean of SIGS: Dr. James Wirtz Dean of GSOIS: Dr. Gordon McCormick •RResearchesearch programs are aligned to NPS curricula Dean of Research: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Agency (DOD) Program Charts Feb 2019
    Index to Charts: Guide to Defense Basic Research Funding Chart #s Topic 1 - 2 Contents 3 - 22 Overview Perspectives, including suggestions on working with DOD Program Officers 23 - 38 By Academic Disciplines 39 - 45 Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) 46 - 54 Army Research Office (ARO) 55 Army Corp of Engineers 56 - 59 Army Medical Research and Materials Command (AMRMC) 60 Army Research Institute for Behavioral and Social Science (ARI) 61 - 74 Office of Naval Research (ONR) 75 - 76 Naval Post-Graduate School (NPSG) 77 - 109 Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) 110 - 113 Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) 114 High Performance Computing 115 MINERVA (social science) 116 - 119 University Research Initiative (URI, including MURI, DURIP, NDSEG) 120 - 122 Defense Medical Research and Development Program (DMRDP) 123 - 130 Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (CDMRP) 131 US Department of Veterans Affairs 132 University Affiliated Research Centers 133 - 139 Young Investigator / Early Career 140 - 141 Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellow (was NSSEFF) 142 DOD I-Corps 143 Defense Sciences Study Group (DSSG) 144 STEM Education - SMART !1 Revised Jul 2019 Index to Charts: Guidance to Defense Selected Applied Research and Exploratory Development Funding Chart #s Topic 145- 149 Applied Research and Advanced Technology Development 150 - 154 Air Force Materiel Command 155 Air Force Academy 156 - 166 Army Materiel Command 167 US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 168 - 172 Naval Research - Applied Research and Adv Technol 173
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Science in the United States: an Encyclopedia
    The History of Science in the United States An Encyclopedia Edited by Marc Rothenberg Smithsonian Institution Garland Publishing, Inc. New York & London 2001 O Office routine work and admiralty exploring expe- government science such as fisheries research as well as ditions, marine science centered around the British private projects, so oceanographic work, which was Association for the Advancement of Science Dredging particularly expensive, slowed down dramatically until Committee from 1839 until the mid-1860s, after preparations began for World War II. which time a Royal Society-admiralty partnership took As with other sciences, World War II partnerships over the lead and dispatched a series of summer expedi- helped forge a new relationship between governments tions. These culminated in the four-year circumnav- and oceanography. Oceanographic work during and igation of HMS Challenger (1872–1876), the first after the war carried the imprint of wartime govern- expedition sent out with a mandate to study the world’s ment support and policy in both its problem selection oceans. Both the United States and Britain quickly fol- and its scale. Physical studies gained and maintained lowed the example of the Naples Zoological Station precedence over biological ones. The areas of inquiry and set up coastal marine biological laboratories in the promoted by wartime efforts related to submarine and 1880s and 1890s. antisubmarine tactics. New research began on under- In the last quarter of the nineteenth century, many water acoustics, while ocean floor sediment charts were nations sponsored oceanographic voyages modeled compiled from existing data. Wave studies also received after the Challenger’s. The United States, Russia, Ger- precedence for their value in predicting surf conditions many, Norway, France, and Italy contributed to the for landings.
    [Show full text]
  • National Science Foundation FY 2022 Budget Request to Congress
    NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION FY 2022 Budget Request to Congress May 28, 2021 ii FY 2022 Budget Request to Congress NOTES Table and Figure Notes Numbers in the tables and figures may not add up to totals because of rounding. Common Acronyms Used in NSF’s Budget Submission Appropriation Accounts • AOAM - Agency Operations and Award Management • EHR - Education and Human Resources • MREFC - Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction • NSB – Office of the National Science Board • OIG - Office of Inspector General • R&RA - Research and Related Activities Directorates and offices • BFA - Office of Budget, Finance, and Award Management • BIO - Directorate for Biological Sciences • CISE - Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering • ENG - Directorate for Engineering • EHR - Directorate for Education and Human Resources • GEO - Directorate for Geosciences • MPS - Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences • SBE - Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences • TIP - Directorate for Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships • OIRM - Office of Information and Resource Management • OISE - Office of International Science and Engineering • OPP - Office of Polar Programs • OIA - Office of Integrative Activities [organizational unit] • IA - Integrative Activities [budget activity] NSF Big Ideas Convergence Accelerator • CA - NSF Convergence Accelerator Research Big Ideas • HDR - Harnessing the Data Revolution for 21st-Century Science and Engineering • FW-HTF - The Future of Work at the Human-Technology
    [Show full text]