DOCSLIB.ORG

The Evolution of the US Ballistic Missile Defence Debate 1989-2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Evolution of the US Ballistic Missile Defence Debate 1989-2010 The Evolution of the US Ballistic Missile Defence Debate 1989-2010 Institutional Rivalry, Party Politics, and the Progression Towards Political and Strategic Acceptance By Andrew James Futter A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Political Science and International Studies, College of Social Sciences, The University of Birmingham, September 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis explains the complex evolution of US ballistic missile defence (BMD) policy between 1989 and 2010, and moves beyond the political rhetoric and intellectual obfuscation that surrounds the policy in much of the literature. By developing an explanatory framework to rigorously and systematically analyse the impact of different dynamics on policy, it explains the rhythms of day-to- day policy in particular context; explains the medium-term shifts in the domestic political space within which the day-to-day policy debate occurred, and explains the long-term move towards acceptance and the gradual normalisation of BMD in American security policy. The primary argument of the thesis is that the particular configuration of domestic political institutions and party political pressures at any given time has been far more important in shaping BMD policy during each presidential administration since the end of the Cold War than has previously been acknowledged. Secondly, it argues that developments in the international system and technology have gradually altered the context within which this domestic political debate has occurred. Finally, it shows that domestic political influences, and the gradual shift in the contours of the domestic debate are the key reasons why BMD has gone from being one of the most divisive, zero- sum political issues in American national security thinking, to something that has largely become normalised, with debate now only occurring at the margins. This thesis is dedicated to my late father, John Futter. Acknowledgements I have incurred numerous debts whilst writing this thesis. It is perhaps most appropriate to begin by acknowledging the Economic and Social Research Council for their generous financial assistance, without which I would have been unable to undertake the project. Their research awards offer incredible opportunities to budding scholars, and I am extremely grateful to have been a recipient of such an award. I would also like to express my appreciation of the patience and dedication shown by my supervisors, Dr David Dunn and Dr Adam Quinn. David has been central to this research from the very beginning, and was one of the main reasons that I decided to do my PhD at Birmingham. Over the many years that I have known him, he has been both a great mentor and a constant source of inspiration. It is primarily through my conversations with David that I developed my interest in ballistic missile defence and nuclear weapons, and through which this thesis had its genesis. Although Adam joined the project at a later stage, his enthusiasm and energy have been fundamental to the finished product, and he has provided a constant source of reassurance. I am indebted to his determination to steer the thesis in the right direction, and to the time he provided to discuss the work. Above all, I am indebted to their patience and fortitude – which I have often tested – and especially to their clever ability to finally make me accept that I had to have some theory in the thesis! More broadly, I would also like to thank Dr David Norman for his friendship, determination to indoctrinate me with political theory, and propensity to end our discussions in the pub, Dr Edward Newman, who acted as second supervisor during the early years of the study and who has been a constant source of support, and Dr Andre Broome for his time, advice and help during my studies. Outside of Birmingham, I would like to thank Professor Matthew Watson for his help in preparing both my original ESRC 1+3 PhD and ESRC PostDoc application, and Dr Trevor McCrisken for introducing me to many contacts in the academic and policy world. During the summer of 2010 I was a visiting scholar at the Council for a Livable World in Washington DC. This experience turned out to be extraordinarily valuable, both from a personal and a professional point of view. The Executive Director of the think tank, John Issacs, showed fantastic enthusiasm for my visit, and his encyclopaedic knowledge of the missile defence issue combined with his enormous range of contacts in the Washington policy world proved a huge source of inspiration. John, along with all the staff at the Council were integral in making my stay in Washington so memorable and productive, and I hope to be able to repay the substantial debt I owe my American colleagues through our continuing friendship in the future. Special thanks must also go to all those policymakers, officials and commentators, who so generously agreed to give up their time and be interviewed during this trip. It is important to also acknowledge the support of my friends. Although I have found writing the PhD enormously rewarding, it is inevitably a rather draining process. Consequently, it has been extremely helpful to be able to undertake the experience with such a lively and interesting group of colleagues in the Department. In particular, Laurence Cooley, Anthony Hopkins, Mark McClelland, Amin Samman and Ben Zala deserve a special mention. I must also thank Dr Oz Hassan – formerly of POLSIS – for his friendship, hilarious dress sense, and unstinting support as my academic sounding board throughout this period. In addition to this, the distractions provided by numerous friends who are not involved in academia has been invaluable in helping me to keep going through what has occasionally been a very testing a difficult period. In this regard, I must also thank Dave Terrace – my long-suffering flat mate and comedy sparing-partner – for his understanding and support over the last few years. Finally, I would like to express my gratitude for the incredible support provided by my family over the course of this project. My greatest thanks must go to my mum, Alison, without whose constant support this thesis would perhaps have never begun, let alone been finished, and to my brother Jack, without whom my car would surely have spent even more time off the road getting fixed! Finally, I owe a huge debt of gratitude to my late father John, who was responsible for developing my interest in reading, current affairs and history, and who helped shape my inquisitive mind. Although he was not here to see the culmination of this process, it is to him that I owe the greatest gratitude, and it is for this reason that I have dedicated the thesis to him. Andrew Futter Birmingham, 2011 1 Contents Glossary 2 Cast of Characters 4 Introduction 6 1. Conceptual Framework 15 2. The Missile Defence Pragmatist – George H. W. Bush (1989-1993) 31 3. Bill Clinton and the End of the Star Wars Era (1993-1997) 73 4. Party Politics and Republican Pressure for Deployment (1997-2001) 112 5. George W. Bush, ABM Treaty Abrogation and Deployment (2001-2005) 148 6. Expanding and Integrating the US Missile Defence Programme (2005-2009) 186 7. The Reluctant Convert – Barack Obama (2009-2010) 215 Conclusion 243 Bibliography 256 1 Glossary Glossary Anti Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty Treaty between the United States and the Soviet Union, limiting the deployment of national missile defences (1972 – 2002). Aegis BMD Sea-based missile defence system. Accidental Launch Protection System Missile defence plan proposed by Senator Sam (ALPS) Nunn in 1988. Ballistic Missile Defense Organisation Agency responsible for the US BMD (BMDO) programme (1993 - 2002). Brilliant Pebbles Space-based component of the GPALS system. Exoatmospheric Reentry-vehicle Interception The ground-based component of the SDI and System (ERIS) GPALS system. Global Protection Against Limited Strikes BMD architecture unveiled by George H. W. (GPALS) Bush in January 1991. Ground-based Interceptor (GBI) missile The successor to the ERIS missile, designed to intercept long-range missiles in space. Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) System to shoot down ICBM’s while travelling through space. Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) A missile capable of travelling a distance of 3,500m or greater, which can be armed with nuclear warheads. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) International organisation for the peaceful use of nuclear energy. Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Agency responsible for the US missile defence programme (2002 -). National/ Strategic Missile Defense (NMD) A missile defence system designed to protect the US homeland. 2 Glossary New START Treaty Treaty between the United States and Russia (February 2011 -). Patriot BMD Battlefield BMD system for use against short- range missiles. Phased Adaptive Approach (PAA) Missile defence plan for Europe announced by Barack Obama in 2009. Phase I Strategic Defense System (SDS) BMD deployment plan outlined by Ronald Reagan in 1987. Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) Interceptor missile used by the Aegis BMD for short-intermediate range interception. Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty I (START I) Treaty between the United States and Russia, (1991 - 2009). Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty II (START II) Treaty between the United States and Russia (2000 - 2002).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AN ANALYSIS of POST-COLD WAR CONCEPTS in AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY: CONTINUITY OR CHANGE? by Ana Maria Venegas a Thesis Submitted
    AN ANALYSIS OF POST-COLD WAR CONCEPTS IN AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY: CONTINUITY OR CHANGE? by Ana Maria Venegas A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Global Security Studies Baltimore, Maryland December 2014 © 2014 Ana Maria Venegas All Rights Reserved Abstract This thesis investigates post-Cold War concepts in US foreign policy. At the end of the Cold War, prominent political scientists and commentators argued, for various reasons, that the strategic environment was so dramatically different that the United States would no longer be able to engage the world as it had in the past. In an attempt to understand the ramifications of the evolution of the strategic environment, this thesis asked the question: Have the three post-Cold War presidents, William J. Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack H. Obama, continued to engage the world in ways consistent with previous administrations or have the broken from traditional concepts in American foreign policy? To answer this question, declaratory foreign policy as articulated in national security strategy documents and key foreign policy engagements were analyzed and compared to nine traditional concepts in American foreign policy identified by prominent historians and political scientists. The post-Cold War administrations continued to develop foreign policy consistent with the concepts identified by historians and political scientists suggesting a measure of consistency in the way the United States engages the world. Additionally, each president developed foreign policy that exhibited unique characteristics inconsistent with the traditional concepts. These policies were characterized by the importance placed on multilateral consensus; an emphasis on multilateral agreements and alliances to foster a stable international order; and the reliance on international organizations to address regional and global issues.
    [Show full text]
  • George W Bush Childhood Home Reconnaissance Survey.Pdf
    Intermountain Region National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior August 2015 GEORGE W. BUSH CHILDHOOD HOME Reconnaissance Survey Midland, Texas Front cover: President George W. Bush and First Lady Laura Bush speak to the media after touring the President’s childhood home at 1421 West Ohio Avenue, Midland, Texas, on October 4, 2008. President Bush traveled to attend a Republican fundraiser in the town where he grew up. Photo: SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images CONTENTS BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE — i SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — iii RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY PROCESS — v NPS CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE — vii National Historic Landmark Criterion 2 – viii NPS Theme Studies on Presidential Sites – ix GEORGE W. BUSH: A CHILDHOOD IN MIDLAND — 1 SUITABILITY — 17 Childhood Homes of George W. Bush – 18 Adult Homes of George W. Bush – 24 Preliminary Determination of Suitability – 27 HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION OF THE GEORGE W. BUSH CHILDHOOD HOME, MIDLAND TEXAS — 29 Architectural Description – 29 Building History – 33 FEASABILITY AND NEED FOR NPS MANAGEMENT — 35 Preliminary Determination of Feasability – 37 Preliminary Determination of Need for NPS Management – 37 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS — 39 APPENDIX: THE 41ST AND 43RD PRESIDENTS AND FIRST LADIES OF THE UNITED STATES — 43 George H.W. Bush – 43 Barbara Pierce Bush – 44 George W. Bush – 45 Laura Welch Bush – 47 BIBLIOGRAPHY — 49 SURVEY TEAM MEMBERS — 51 George W. Bush Childhood Home Reconnaissance Survey George W. Bush’s childhood bedroom at the George W. Bush Childhood Home museum at 1421 West Ohio Avenue, Midland, Texas, 2012. The knotty-pine-paneled bedroom has been restored to appear as it did during the time that the Bush family lived in the home, from 1951 to 1955.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bush Revolution: the Remaking of America's Foreign Policy
    The Bush Revolution: The Remaking of America’s Foreign Policy Ivo H. Daalder and James M. Lindsay The Brookings Institution April 2003 George W. Bush campaigned for the presidency on the promise of a “humble” foreign policy that would avoid his predecessor’s mistake in “overcommitting our military around the world.”1 During his first seven months as president he focused his attention primarily on domestic affairs. That all changed over the succeeding twenty months. The United States waged wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. U.S. troops went to Georgia, the Philippines, and Yemen to help those governments defeat terrorist groups operating on their soil. Rather than cheering American humility, people and governments around the world denounced American arrogance. Critics complained that the motto of the United States had become oderint dum metuant—Let them hate as long as they fear. September 11 explains why foreign policy became the consuming passion of Bush’s presidency. Once commercial jetliners plowed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, it is unimaginable that foreign policy wouldn’t have become the overriding priority of any American president. Still, the terrorist attacks by themselves don’t explain why Bush chose to respond as he did. Few Americans and even fewer foreigners thought in the fall of 2001 that attacks organized by Islamic extremists seeking to restore the caliphate would culminate in a war to overthrow the secular tyrant Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Yet the path from the smoking ruins in New York City and Northern Virginia to the battle of Baghdad was not the case of a White House cynically manipulating a historic catastrophe to carry out a pre-planned agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Ledeen, the Neoconservatives, and The
    Hugh B. Urban such conservative think-tanks as the American Enterprise Institute and 321.64:321.7 the Project for the New American Century, counting among their ranks politicians and militarists including Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rums- feld, and Dick Cheney, as well as such intellectuals as Irving Kristol, HUGH B. URBAN William Kristol, and (until recently) Francis Fukuyama. Despite their many ideological, cultural, and socioeconomic differences, these two factions have come together in the current White House and have found common ground in the policies of George W. Bush. Indeed, Bush represents a kind of structural link or ligament that helps tie these two, otherwise very different factions together: He embodies the MACHIAVELLI MEETS THE RELIGIOUS ideals of piety, morality, and family values that appeal to his strongest RIGHT: MICHAEL LEDEEN, THE base of popular support among evangelical Christians, while at the same time embracing the aggressive militarism and nation-building NEOCONSERVATIVES, AND THE POLITICAL agenda promoted by the Neoconservatives. The result is what David USES OF FUNDAMENTALISM Domke has called a kind of „political fundamentalism,” that is, „an in- tertwining of conservative religious faith, politics, and strategic com- munication.”5 In this essay, I will expand Domke’s notion of political funda- Americans are a free people, who know that freedom is the right of mentalism by examining what I will call the political uses of funda- every person and the future of every nation. The liberty we prize is not mentalism6—that is, the strategic manipulation of religious beliefs, America’s gift to the world, it is God’s gift to humanity ..
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Way That George W Bush's Evangelical
    Thesis Title: The Bible as a ‘pretty good political handbook’: an examination of the way that George W Bush’s evangelical faith has shaped his political agenda. Author: Christine Winter Supervisor: Professor Gary Trompf Year: Honours Department of Studies in Religion School of English, Art History, Film and Media Faculty of Arts 2004 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 3 CHAPTER 1 6 CHAPTER 2 26 CHAPTER 3 42 CONCLUSION 59 BIBLIOGRAPHY 63 2 Introduction The purpose of this thesis is to examine the very public religiosity of the current President of the United States of America, George W Bush, and to determine if his personal religious views have shaped his political choices.1 In order to achieve this, it is first necessary to define the methodology that will be used to determine if religious influence is present and this will be defined with reference to the religious character, political aims and public faces of the American evangelical movement. To this end, the first chapter will give a brief history of evangelical Christianity, focusing on its defining characteristics, political efforts and the major players in the movement and thus will identify the main political concerns of this group since the 1970s. Chapter Two will present a brief biography of Bush, concentrating on his religious background, public demonstrations of his religious beliefs, encounters with the political muscle of the Religious Right and his stances on the issues identified as concerns of evangelical Christians. This will be performed in order to demonstrate Bush’s identification with evangelical Christianity, the importance of religion to him and his experience dealing with the Religious Right in the field of politics up until the end of his second term as Governor of Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • How Sports Help to Elect Presidents, Run Campaigns and Promote Wars."
    Abstract: Daniel Matamala In this thesis for his Master of Arts in Journalism from Columbia University, Chilean journalist Daniel Matamala explores the relationship between sports and politics, looking at what voters' favorite sports can tell us about their political leanings and how "POWER GAMES: How this can be and is used to great eect in election campaigns. He nds that -unlike soccer in Europe or Latin America which cuts across all social barriers- sports in the sports help to elect United States can be divided into "red" and "blue". During wartime or when a nation is under attack, sports can also be a powerful weapon Presidents, run campaigns for fuelling the patriotism that binds a nation together. And it can change the course of history. and promote wars." In a key part of his thesis, Matamala describes how a small investment in a struggling baseball team helped propel George W. Bush -then also with a struggling career- to the presidency of the United States. Politics and sports are, in other words, closely entwined, and often very powerfully so. Submitted in partial fulllment of the degree of Master of Arts in Journalism Copyright Daniel Matamala, 2012 DANIEL MATAMALA "POWER GAMES: How sports help to elect Presidents, run campaigns and promote wars." Submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree of Master of Arts in Journalism Copyright Daniel Matamala, 2012 Published by Columbia Global Centers | Latin America (Santiago) Santiago de Chile, August 2014 POWER GAMES: HOW SPORTS HELP TO ELECT PRESIDENTS, RUN CAMPAIGNS AND PROMOTE WARS INDEX INTRODUCTION. PLAYING POLITICS 3 CHAPTER 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Documents
    Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Monday, December 22, 2008 Volume 44—Number 50 Pages 1519–1576 VerDate Aug 31 2005 13:40 Dec 23, 2008 Jkt 217250 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 1249 Sfmt 1249 E:\PRESDOCS\P50DEF4.019 P50DEF4 dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with PRESDOCSF Contents Addresses and Remarks Executive Orders See also Meetings With Foreign Leaders Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay—1567 Afghanistan, military personnel at Bagram Air Base—1531 Interviews With the News Media American auto industry—1568 Exchange with reporters in Baghdad, Iraq— American Enterprise Institute and a question- 1520 and-answer session—1547 Interviews Hanukkah menorah, lighting—1537 Steve Scully of C–SPAN—1560 Iraq Military personnel at Camp Victory in White House press pool—1525 Baghdad—1523 News conference with President Karzai of Strategic framework agreement and status Afghanistan in Kabul, Afghanistan, of forces agreement, signing ceremony in December 15—1534 Baghdad—1520 Meetings With Foreign Leaders Pennsylvania, U.S. Army War College in Carlisle—1542 Afghanistan, President Karzai—1534 President George W. Bush and First Lady El Salvador, President Saca—1538 Laura Bush, unveiling official portraits— Iraq 1570 Prime Minister Maliki—1520 Radio address—1519 President Talabani—1520 U.S.-Afghan Women’s Council, reception Palestinian Authority, President Abbas—1571 honoring—1546 Proclamations Communications to Congress To Take Certain Actions Under the African Kosovo and Azerbaijan, letter extending Growth and Opportunity Act and the Generalized System of
    [Show full text]
  • THE REDEMPTION Everything Went Wrong for George W
    The New Yorker THE REDEMPTION Everything went wrong for George W. Bush, until he made it all go right. By Nicholas Lemann January 2000 “It’s quite fascinating,” said Joe. “This big honor, the biggest in the world, can happen to a man almost overnight. What was Coolidge when he was nominated for the vice-presidency? He’d been governor of Massachusetts and settled the police strike. What was Harding? Well, Harding isn’t a good example, because he’d not only been governor of his state but United States senator as well. But look at the other side, the Democrats. Wilson, a governor and a college president. Cox? Nobody. Franklin Roosevelt, the fellow that ran for vice-president, I used to know him slightly. At least I met him at dances when I was in college. A typical New York snob, I always thought.” --John O’Hara, “Ten North Frederick.” I met George W. Bush once by accident back in the early seventies, at Harvard. I must have been a freshman or a sophomore. Some home-town friends of mine from New Orleans, Grant and Margot Thomas, were in Cambridge for a few years because Grant was getting a master’s degree, and I used to drop by their apartment all the time. To me, it was a warm island of Southern gaiety in a sour sea of ambition and after-the-revolution ill will. Life had a light and charming cast there. The Thomases had a dog named Layla, and their neighbors, who were the authors of the Curious George books, would appear occasionally to deliver fond mock-chastisings in a Mittel-europa accent.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGE W. BUSH Recent Titles in Greenwood Biographies Halle Berry: a Biography Melissa Ewey Johnson Osama Bin Laden: a Biography Thomas R
    GEORGE W. BUSH Recent Titles in Greenwood Biographies Halle Berry: A Biography Melissa Ewey Johnson Osama bin Laden: A Biography Thomas R. Mockaitis Tyra Banks: A Biography Carole Jacobs Jean-Michel Basquiat: A Biography Eric Fretz Howard Stern: A Biography Rich Mintzer Tiger Woods: A Biography, Second Edition Lawrence J. Londino Justin Timberlake: A Biography Kimberly Dillon Summers Walt Disney: A Biography Louise Krasniewicz Chief Joseph: A Biography Vanessa Gunther John Lennon: A Biography Jacqueline Edmondson Carrie Underwood: A Biography Vernell Hackett Christina Aguilera: A Biography Mary Anne Donovan Paul Newman: A Biography Marian Edelman Borden GEORGE W. BUSH A Biography Clarke Rountree GREENWOOD BIOGRAPHIES Copyright 2011 by ABC-CLIO, LLC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rountree, Clarke, 1958– George W. Bush : a biography / Clarke Rountree. p. cm. — (Greenwood biographies) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-313-38500-1 (hard copy : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-0-313-38501-8 (ebook) 1. Bush, George W. (George Walker), 1946– 2. United States— Politics and government—2001–2009. 3. Presidents—United States— Biography. I. Title. E903.R68 2010 973.931092—dc22 [B] 2010032025 ISBN: 978-0-313-38500-1 EISBN: 978-0-313-38501-8 15 14 13 12 11 1 2 3 4 5 This book is also available on the World Wide Web as an eBook.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Commentary 1-31-17
    Stanley Renshon Public Affairs/Commentary-February 2017 I: Commentary Pieces/Op Ed Pieces 33. “Will Mexico Pay for Trump’s Wall?” [on-line debate, John S. Kierman ed], February 16, 2017. https://wallethub.com/blog/will-mexico-pay-for-the- wall/32590/#stanley-renshon 32. “Psychoanalyst to Trump: Grow up and adapt,” USA TODAY, June 23, 2106. http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/06/23/trump-psychoanalyst- grow-up-adapt-column/86181242/ 31. “9/11: What would Trump Do?,” Politico Magazine, March 31, 2016. http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/donald-trump-2016-terrorist- attack-foreign-policy-213784 30. “You don't know Trump as well as you think,” USA TODAY, March 25, 2106. http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/03/25/donald-trump-narcissist- business-leadership-respect-column/82209524/ 29. “Some presidents aspire to be great, more aspire to do well’ essay for “The Big Idea- Diagnosing the Urge to Run for Office,” Politico Magazine, November/December 2015. http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/10/2016-candidates-mental- health-213274?paginate=false 28. “Obama’s Place in History: Great, Good, Average, Mediocre or Poor?,” Washington Post, February 24, 2014. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/02/24/obamas- place-in-history-great-good-average-mediocre-or-poor/ 27. President Romney or President Obama: A Tale of Two Ambitions, Montreal Review, October 2012. http://www.themontrealreview.com/2009/President-Romney-or-President- Obama-A-Tale-of-Two-Ambitions.php 26. America Principio, Por Favor, Arizona Daily Star, July 1, 2012. http://azstarnet.com/news/opinion/guest-column-practice-inhibits-forming-full- attachments-to-us/article_10009d68-0fcc-5f4a-8d38-2f5e95a7e138.html 25.
    [Show full text]
  • Binary Discourse in U.S. Presidential Speeches from FDR to Bush II
    IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP) e-ISSN: 2278-4861. Volume 5, Issue 2 (Nov. - Dec. 2013), PP 25-36 www.iosrjournals.org Binary Discourse in U.S. Presidential Speeches from FDR to Bush II Dr. Wassim Daghrir, The University of Sousse, Tunisia I. Introduction The contemporary study of American Presidential rhetoric is of great significance. Politics is very largely the use of language. Presidential speech and action increasingly reflect the opinion that speaking is governing. In fact, the power of the presidency depends on its ability to persuade. The application of power is often legitimized through rhetorical persuasion; and, in the case of American Presidents, such power, and its associated rhetoric, becomes the fulcrum upon which many global issues turn. Manichaeism: a Definition The term Manichean refers in its most literal sense to a religion founded in the third century by the Persian prophet Manes. The movement attracted large numbers of followers, who were drawn to its simplicity and moral clarity. Its central guideline was that the entire world could be plainly divided into two opposing spheres –God and Satan in the world of the eternal, and a corresponding dualistic battle of Good and Evil playing out on Earth. World events were all driven by, were all the product of, an ongoing, endless conflict between the forces of Good and the forces of Evil. One‘s moral duty was to maintain adherence to God‘s will by siding with Good and battling against the forces of Evil. II. Rhetorical Devices and Manipulations At the heart of the American presidential discourse exists a coherent worldview, one several presidents have applied with remarkable consistency and uncompromising conviction.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Rhetoric and the Evolution of George W. Bush's Political Philosophy Lauren Frances Turek Trinity University, [email protected]
    Trinity University Digital Commons @ Trinity History Faculty Research History Department 11-2014 Religious Rhetoric and the Evolution of George W. Bush's Political Philosophy Lauren Frances Turek Trinity University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/hist_faculty Part of the History Commons Repository Citation Turek, L.F. (2014). Religious rhetoric and the evolution of George W. Bush's political philosophy. Journal of American Studies, 48(4), 975-998. doi: 10.1017/S0021875814000681 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History Department at Digital Commons @ Trinity. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Research by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Trinity. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Title: Religious Rhetoric and the Evolution of George W. Bush’s Political Philosophy Abstract: This manuscript surveys George W. Bush’s public statements from 1993 to 2001 to examine the evolution of his religious and political rhetoric. Bush’s personal religiosity and his use of religious rhetoric during his campaigns for the presidency and in his two terms in office have received extensive comment from the press as well as from scholars. Yet very little scholarly work has considered the role of religion in his earlier political career. Although Bush had evinced a deep and genuine evangelical faith for years before he launched his bid for governor, he did not begin his political career as an overtly Christian leader. Instead, over the course of his governorship, he gradually incorporated Christian tropes in his speeches to develop, explain, and gain support for his “compassionate conservative” policies and to build rapport with voters.
    [Show full text]