DOCSLIB.ORG

Human Rights in Moldova

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Human Rights in Moldova HUMAN RIGHTS IN MOLDOVA HH RR MM The Turbulent Dniester A Division of Human Rights Watch HHHUMAN RRRIGHTS IIIN MMMOLDOVA The Turbulent Dniester March 1993 Helsinki Watch A Division of Human Rights Watch 485 Fifth Avenue 1522 K Street, NW Suite 910 New York, NY 1001710017----61046104 Washington, DC 2000520005----12021202 Tel: (212) 972972----84008400 Tel: (202) 371371----65926592 Fax: (212) 972972----09050905 Fax: (202) 371371----01240124 Copyright 8 March 1993 by Human Rights Watch. All Rights Reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Card Catalogue No.: 92-75041 ISBN 1-56432-089-8 Helsinki Watch Committee Helsinki Watch was formed in 1978 to monitor and promote domestic and international compliance with the human rights provisions of the 1975 Helsinki Accords. The Chair is Jonathan Fanton; Vice Chair, Alice Henkin; Executive Director, Jeri Laber; Deputy Director, Lois Whitman; Staff Counsel, Holly Cartner; Research Associates, Erika Dailey, Rachel Denber and Ivana Nizich; Associates, Pamela Cox, Christina Derry and Aleksandr Petrov. Helsinki Watch is affiliated with the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, which is based in Vienna, Austria. Human Rights Watch Human Rights Watch is composed of the six divisions, Africa Watch, Americas Watch, Asia Watch, Helsinki Watch, Middle East Watch, and the Fund for Free Expression. Executive CommitteeCommittee: Chair, Robert L. Bernstein; Vice Chair, Adrian W. DeWind; Members: Roland Algrant; Lisa Anderson; Peter D. Bell; Alice Brown; William Carmichael; Dorothy Cullman; Irene Diamond; Jonathan Fanton; Jack Greenberg; Alice H. Henkin; Stephen L. Kass; Marina Pinto Kaufman; Jeri Laber; Aryeh Neier; Bruce Rabb; Harriet Rabb; Kenneth Roth; Orville Schell; Gary G. Sick; Robert Wedgeworth. Staff: Executive Director, Aryeh Neier; Deputy Director, Kenneth Roth; Washington Director, Holly J. Burkhalter; Associate Director, Gara LaMarche; California Director, Ellen Lutz; Press Director, Susan Osnos; Counsel, Jemera Rone; Women's Rights Project Director, Dorothy Q. Thomas; Prison Project Director, Joanna Weschler; Arms Project Director, Kenneth Anderson. Executive Directors Africa Watch Americas Watch Asia Watch Abdullahi An-Na'im Juan E. Méndez Sidney R. Jones Fund for Free Expression Helsinki Watch Middle East Watch Gara LaMarche Jeri Laber Andrew Whitley TTTABLE OF CCCONTENTS Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................................................................iii Map of Moldova...........................................................................................................................................................................................................iv Notes on Geography and Demography..........................................................................................................................................................v Introduction....................................................................................................................................................................................................................1 Chronology of the Conflict..................................................................................................................................................................4 Recommendations..................................................................................................................................................................................8 To both the Government of Moldova and the Authorities in the Dniester Moldovan Republic (DMR) 8 To the Government of Moldova......................................................................................................................................8 To the Authorities in the DMR.........................................................................................................................................9 To the Government of the Russian Federation.....................................................................................................9 To the Government of the United States .................................................................................................................9 Background...................................................................................................................................................................................................................11 Evolution of the Conflict ......................................................................................................................................................................11 New Social and Political Groupings..........................................................................................................................11 Three Movements for Self-Determination ...........................................................................................................12 Unrest Among the Gagauz............................................................................................................................14 Reactions to Legislation Aimed at Promoting Moldovan Culture..........................................................15 Political Harassment......................................................................................................................................................... 17 Parties to the Conflict..........................................................................................................................................................................18 Moldovan Government Forces.....................................................................................................................................18 DMR Forces.............................................................................................................................................................................20 The Russian 14th Army......................................................................................................................................................21 The "Third Force" ................................................................................................................................................................23 Foreign Involvement.........................................................................................................................................................23 Romania ................................................................................................................................................................23 Russia.....................................................................................................................................................................24 Ukraine...................................................................................................................................................................24 Violations of International Humanitarian Law........................................................................................................................................27 Politically Motivated Killings..........................................................................................................................................................27 Killings Committed Allegedly by Supporters of the DMR............................................................................27 Killings Committed Allegedly by Opponents of the DMR............................................................................29 Attacks on Medical Personnel and Vehicles........................................................................................................................30 Mining ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................31 Bendery ....................................................................................................................................................................................31 Cocieri.......................................................................................................................................................................................32 Indiscriminate Attacks Against Civilians and Civilian Structures..........................................................................32 Attacks by Moldovan Government Forces...........................................................................................................32 Bendery .................................................................................................................................................................32 Attacks by DMR Forces ....................................................................................................................................................32 Bendery .................................................................................................................................................................32 Slobozia .................................................................................................................................................................33 Cocieri....................................................................................................................................................................34
Load more

Recommended publications
  • External Evaluation of OHCHR Project “Combating Discrimination in the Republic of Moldova, Including in the Transnistrian Region” 2014-2015
    External Evaluation of OHCHR Project “Combating Discrimination in the Republic of Moldova, including in the Transnistrian Region” 2014-2015 FINAL REPORT This report has been prepared by an external consultant. The views expressed herein are those of the consultant and therefore do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the OHCHR. December 2015 Acknowledgments The evaluator of the OHCHR project “Combating Discrimination in the Republic of Moldova, including in the Transnistrian Region” is deeply grateful to the many individuals who made their time available for providing information, discussing and answering questions. In particular, the evaluator benefited extensively from the generous information and feedback from OHCHR colleagues and consultants in OHCHR Field Presence in Moldova and in OHCHR Geneva. The evaluator also had constructive meetings with groups of direct beneficiaries, associated project partners, national authorities, and UN colleagues in Moldova, including in the Transnistrian region. External Evaluator Mr. Bjorn Pettersson, Independent Consultant OHCHR Evaluation Reference Group Mrs. Jennifer Worrell (PPMES) Mrs. Sylta Georgiadis (PPMES) Mr. Sabas Monroy (PPMES) Mrs. Hulan Tsedev (FOTCD) Ms. Anita Trimaylova (FOTCD) Ms. Laure Beloin (DEXREL) Mr. Ferran Lloveras (OHCHR Brussels) Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Human Rights Report
    MOLDOVA 2016 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT Note: Unless otherwise noted, all references in this report exclude the secessionist region of Transnistria. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Moldova is a republic with a form of parliamentary democracy. The constitution provides for a multiparty democracy with legislative and executive branches as well as an independent judiciary and a clear separation of powers. Legislative authority is vested in the unicameral parliament. Pro-European parties retained a parliamentary majority in 2014 elections that met most Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), Council of Europe, and other international commitments, although local and international observers raised concerns about the inclusion and exclusion of specific political parties. On January 20, a new government was formed after two failed attempts to nominate a candidate for prime minister. Opposition and civil society representatives criticized the government formation process as nontransparent. On March 4, the Constitutional Court ruled unconstitutional an amendment that empowered parliament to elect the president and reinstated presidential elections by direct and secret popular vote. Two rounds of presidential elections were held on October 30 and November 13, resulting in the election of Igor Dodon. According to the preliminary conclusions of the OSCE election observation mission, both rounds were fair and respected fundamental freedoms. International and domestic observers, however, noted polarized and unbalanced media coverage, harsh and intolerant rhetoric, lack of transparency in campaign financing, and instances of abuse of administrative resources. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces. Widespread corruption, especially within the judicial sector, continued to be the most significant human rights problem during the year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the European Court of Human Rights on Justice Sector Reform in the Republic of Moldova
    Journal of Liberty and International Affairs | Vol. 4, No. 2, 2018 | eISSN 1857-9760 Published online by the Institute for Research and European Studies at www.e-jlia.com © 2018 Judithanne Scourfield McLauchlan This is an open access article distributed under the CC-BY 3.0 License. Peer review method: Double-Blind Date of acceptance: September 16, 2018 Date of publication: November 12, 2018 Original scientific article UDC 341.645.544.096(478) THE IMPACT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ON JUSTICE SECTOR REFORM IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA Judithanne Scourfield McLauchlan Associate Professor of Political Science, University of South Florida St. Petersburg, United States of America Fulbright Scholar Moldova 2010, 2012 jsm2[at]usfsp.edu Abstract For this study, I reviewed the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights against the Republic of Moldova and the corresponding reports of the Committee of Ministers from 1997 through 2014. In addition, I interviewed more than 25 lawyers, judges, and human rights advocates. After analyzing the effectiveness of the Court in terms of compliance with the judgments in specific cases (individual measures), I will assess the broader impact of these decisions (general measures) on legal reforms and public policy in the Republic of Moldova. I will evaluate the effectiveness of the decisions of the ECtHR in the context of the implementation of Moldova’s Justice Sector Reform Strategy (2011-2015), the Council of Europe’s Action Plan to Support Democratic Reforms in the Republic of Moldova (2013-2016), and Moldova’s National Human Rights Action Plan (2011-2014). My findings will offer insights into the constraints faced by the ECtHR in implementing its decisions and the impact of the ECtHR on national legal systems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic Process: Promises and Challenges
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 480 425 SO 035 277 AUTHOR Bragaw, Donald, Ed. TITLE The Democratic Process: Promises and Challenges. INSTITUTION Street Law, Inc., Washington, DC.; Social Science Education Consortium, Inc., Boulder, CO.; Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC.; Constitutional Rights Foundation, Los Angeles, CA.; Constitutional Rights Foundation, Chicago, IL.; American Forum for Global Education, New York, NY. SPONS AGENCY Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC. ISBN ISBN-0-94467-73-5 PUB DATE 2003-00-00 NOTE 230p.; A Resource Guide produced for the Democracy Education Exchange Project (DEEP). CONTRACT R304A010002B AVAILABLE FROM American Forum for Global Education, 120 Wall Street, Suite 2600, New York, NY 10005. Tel: 212-624-1300; Fax: 212-624- 1412; e-mail: [email protected]; Web site: http://www.globaled.org/. For full text: http://www.globaled.org/ DemProcess.pdf. PUB TYPE Books (010) Collected Works General (020) -- Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC10 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Democracy; *European History; Foreign Countries; *Geographic Regions; Global Education; Middle Schools; Secondary Education; Social Studies IDENTIFIERS *Europe (East) ABSTRACT When the Berlin Wall (East Germany) came down, it symbolically foretold the end of the Soviet Union domination of Eastern Europe and Central Asia. This resource guide examines the process toward democratization occurring in those regions. The guide updates the available classroom material on the democratic process. It is divided into three sections: (1) "Promises and Challenges" (contains five essays and nine lessons); (2) "Voices of Transition" (contains eight essays and eight lessons); and (3) "Fostering a Democratic Dialogue" (contains 3 essays and eight lessons) .Includes six maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Page | 1 FINAL REPORT June 2019 Project Financed By
    P a g e | 1 ENI – European Neighbourhood Instrument (NEAR) Agreement reference No ENPI/2014/354-587 Increased opportunities and better living conditions across the Nistru/Dniestr River FINAL REPORT June 2019 Project financed by the European Union Final Report Support to Confidence Building Measures, 15 March 2015-31 December 2018 – submitted by UNDP Moldova 1 P a g e | 2 Project Title: Support to Confidence Building Measures Starting date: 15 March 2015 Report end date: 31 December 2018 Implementing agency: UNDP Moldova Country: Republic of Moldova Increased opportunities and better living conditions across the Nistru/Dniestr River ENPI/2014/354-587 Final Report (15 March 2015 - 31 December 2018) – submitted by UNDP Moldova P a g e | 3 Table of Contents I. SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 4 II. CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................ 6 III. PROGRESS UPDATE ................................................................................................................................. 7 3.1 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AND EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES ..................................................................................... 7 3.2 EMPOWERED COMMUNITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT ....................................................................................... 8 IV. KEY RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Day the Bear Cowered: Russian Non-Intervention in the Baltics
    The Day the Bear Cowered: Russian Non-Intervention in the Baltics Haverford Political Science Senior Thesis by Ian Wheeler Under Advisement of Prof. Barak Mendelsohn Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 2. Literature Review.................................................................................................................4 3. International Relations Theory ..........................................................................................15 4. Military Intervention ..........................................................................................................18 5. Spheres of Influence ..........................................................................................................20 6. Incentives for Intervention .................................................................................................25 7. Hypotheses .........................................................................................................................28 8. Methodology ......................................................................................................................33 9. Moldova Case Study Overview .........................................................................................38 10. Moldova Hypothesis Testing .............................................................................................46 11. Georgia Case Study Overview ...........................................................................................54
    [Show full text]
  • ADEPT Political Commentaries
    ADEPT Political Commentaries October-December 2002 Bashkan elections in Gagauz Yeri October 2, 2002 Bashkan elections are scheduled in Gagauz-Yeri for October 6. The electoral campaign is characterized by mutual suspicions of falsification. In fact the upcoming elections is a way of settling the conflict arisen in January. Back then, after a control conducted by the Court of Accounts, Gagauz Yeri Parliamentary Assembly initiated the procedure of ousting the incumbent Bashkan. The initiative was supported by the President Vladimir Voronin who accused Bashkan Dumitru Croitor of embezzlement and called him a thief. Gagauz administration denied the accusations and opposed the referenda on ousting the Bashkan, which resulted in scission of the Parliamentary Assembly. Later on Dumitru Croitor and Ivan Burgugji, Chief of the Protocol Section of the PA were investigated for obstruction to referenda. In their turn, the two claimed the referendum was illegal and running counter to the Republic of Moldova laws. Domestic analysts believe those political games impaired the executive branch in the region and thwarted some extremely important investment projects in the southern region of Moldova. The investigation launched against him and his supporters determined Bashkan Croitor to resign in the summer of this year. In its turn the resignation led to early elections scheduled for October 6. One may say that the Bashkan position is disputed by the Communist Party representative Gheorghii Tabunscic, on the one hand and another five candidates on the other (Stepan Topal, Ilia Stamat, Mihail Formuzal, Gheorghii Burgudji and Constantin Tausanji), the latter stand to some extent in opposition to the Communist authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geodemographical Characterization of the Rural Settlements in the Transnistrian Region of the Republic of Moldova
    The Geodemographical Characterization of the Rural Settlements in the Transnistrian Region of the Republic of Moldova V. G. Fomenko, E. V. Constantinov, A. V. Crivenco Transnistrian University, Tiraspol, Republic of Moldova Introduction The contemporary network of the rural localities of Transnistria is made up of 147 localities, which are situated irregularly on the territory of the region. The average density of the rural population is about 1.5 thousand inhabitants. The largest villages are situated in the Slobozia district, where the average density of the population is 3,8 thousand inhabitants. The lowest average density is represented by the Ribnitsa district with 0.7 thousand inhabitants. The density of the rural localities varies between 6,0 localitites in the Dubossari district and 2,5 villages in the Slobozia district. Characteristic Featute of the Region On the whole a characteristic featute of the region is the descrease of the density of rural localities in the northern part in favour of the southern part. Thus a regularity may be observed - the more populous the rural localities are the lower density is marked and vice versa. The density, the topographical, genetical and functional type of the rural localities are changed under the influence of configuration and density of the hydrographical network, the relief division, the direction of the geodemographical and settlement processes, the structural and territorial shifts in the economy of the region - specially the agro-industrial complexes. As a result of the deep productive specialization of the rural settlements the hierarchial subordination becomes more complex through the enlargement of the intercommunication between the localities.
    [Show full text]
  • 1768-1830S a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate
    A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Washington, DC December 17, 2010 Copyright 2010 by Andrew Robarts All Rights Reserved ii A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Dissertation Advisor: Catherine Evtuhov, Ph. D. ABSTRACT Based upon a reading of Ottoman, Russian, and Bulgarian archival documents, this dissertation examines the response by the Ottoman and Russian states to the accelerated pace of migration and spread of disease in the Black Sea region from the outbreak of the Russo-Ottoman War of 1768-1774 to the signing of the Treaty of Hünkar Iskelesi in 1833. Building upon introductory chapters on the Russian-Ottoman Black Sea frontier and a case study of Bulgarian population movements between the Russian and Ottoman Empires, this dissertation analyzes Russian and Ottoman migration and settlement policies, the spread of epidemic diseases (plague and cholera) in the Black Sea region, the construction of quarantines and the implementation of travel document regimes. The role and position of the Danubian Principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia as the “middle ground” between the Ottoman and Russian Empires
    [Show full text]
  • Bauböck-Perchinig WT.Indd
    IMISCOE sievers The European Union’s enlargements of 2004 and 2007 have greatly increased the research diversity of historic experiences within the eU as well as its contemporary conceptions of statehood, nation-building and citizenship. How did newly formed states determine ( e who would become their citizens? How do countries relate to their large emigrant / per communities, to ethnic kin minorities in neighbouring countries and to minorities s . ) pa a c in their own territory? And to which extent have national citizenship policies beenг жд н тво affected by new immigration and by integration into thee U? The expanded and updated hinig edition of Citizenship Policies in the New Europe describes the citizenship laws and their Citizenship Policies in the historical backgrounds in the eU’s twelve new countries and the accession states Croatia / and Turkey. This work complements Acquisition and Loss of Nationality, a two-volume Citizenship Policies in Citizenship the Policies New Europe analysis of the eU’s fifteen old Member States also published in the IMISCOe-aUP Series. Citizenship Policies in Citizenship the Policies New Europe New Europe Authors: Andrea Baršová, Eugene Buttigieg, Agata Górny, Constantin Iordachi, Priit Järve, Elena Jileva, Zeynep Kadirbeyoglu, Mária Kovács, Kristīne Krūma, Expanded and Updated Edition Dagmar Kusá, Andre Liebich, Felicita Medved, Dorota Pudzianowska, Francesco Ragazzi, Wiebke Sievers, Daniel Smilov, Igor Štiks, Judit Tóth and Nicos Trimikliniotis , ( .) “A unique analysis of citizenship
    [Show full text]
  • Politica Externă a Republicii Moldova De La Independenţă La Președinţia Lui Vladimir Voronin
    Politica externă a Republicii Moldova De la independenţă la președinţia lui Vladimir Voronin Volumul I Ileana Racheru P R M D V V V I Bucureşti, 2020 Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României RACHERU, ILEANA Politica externă a Republicii Moldova : de la independenţă la preşedenţia lui Vladimir Voronin / Ileana Racheru. - Bucureşti : Monitorul Oicial R.A., 2020- vol. ISBN 978-606-035-050-7 Vol. 1. - 2020. - Conţine bibliograie. - ISBN 978-606-035-047-7 94 Cuprins INTRODUCERE...................................................................................................................................... 9 Context...................................................................................................................................................... 12 Deruta psihologică și cunoașterea limitată a realităților de politică internațională 12 Politica internă .......................................................................................................................................... 13 Literatura de specialitate și inovația cercetării .......................................................................... 14 Procesul de elaborare a cercetării ..................................................................................................... 15 CAPITOLUL I Concepte, teorii, scheme de analiză. Un model de analiză a politicii externe a Republicii Moldova ........................................................................................................................ 17 Structura metodologică
    [Show full text]
  • Jus Soli Aversion (134) A
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ DEFINING THE NATION IN RUSSIA’S BUFFER ZONE: THE POLITICS OF BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP IN AZERBAIJAN, MOLDOVA AND GEORGIA A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in POLITICS by Maxim Tabachnik December 2017 The Dissertation of Maxim Tabachnik is approved: ________________________________ Professor Roger Schoenman, Chair _________________________________ Professor Ben Read _________________________________ Professor Eleonora Pasotti _________________________________ Professor Matt O’Hara _____________________________ Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Maxim Tabachnik 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page (i) Copyright Page (ii) Table of Contents (iii) List of Figures (viii) Abstract (x) Acknowledgements (xii) Introduction: Frozen Conflicts Under The Weight Of History (1) Part I. The Battle between Blood and Territory: Unanswered Questions (8) Chapter 1. Blood, Territory and the Nation: Ethnic/Civic Confusion (9) 1. Modernists and Their Critics (9) A. The Origins of the Nation: Modern or Pre-Modern? (10) B. The Un-Modernist History of Nationalism: Blood v. Territory (14) 2. Theoretical and Conceptual Hurdles (21) A. The Embattled Ethnic/Civic Dichotomy (21) B. An Ethnic/Territorial Solution (25) Chapter 2. Defining the Task at Hand (34) 1. Unanswered Questions (34) A. Citizenship in History: Between Blood and Territory (35) B. Ethnic/Territorial Dichotomy and Comparative Citizenship Studies (46) C. Ethnic/Territorial Identity in Russian, Soviet and Post-Soviet Space (53) a. Ethnic/Territorial Tension in Russian Imperial and Soviet Identity Policy (53) b. Ethnic/Territorial Citizenship Scholarship in Post-Soviet Space (PSS) (62) D. Unconditional Jus Soli: From the New World to the Human Rights Agenda (75) a.
    [Show full text]