King Offa 757AD -796AD Offa Was Ruler of Mercia, One Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

King Offa 757AD -796AD Offa Was Ruler of Mercia, One Of King Offa 757AD -796AD (Mercian King and Bretwalda of England) Offa was ruler of Mercia, one of the most powerful kingdoms in Anglo-Saxon England that was equivalent to an extended version of the English Midlands region that we still have today. He ruled from 757AD until July 796AD. At the height of his power he was accorded the title of Bretwalda or overlord of England and its many petty kings. Offa was the son of Thingfrith and a descendant of Eowa. As such Offa had a claim on the throne of Mercia because Eowa was brother to King Penda. Penda was Mercian King from 625AD - 655AD. Offa came to the throne after a period of strife within Mercia. These events were sparked off by the assassination of the Mercian King Aethelbald. He had ruled Mercia from 716AD to 757AD and was allegedly killed by his own bodyguards. Aethelbald was then replaced as king by Beonred. Offa defeated Beonred before the end of 757AD and from that point Offa ruled the lands of Mercia until his death in July 796AD. The troubled background that led to Offa claiming the Mercian throne meant that in the early years of his reign he was forced to consolidate his rule within his kingdom. He was also forced to re-establish his over-lordship and control over the neighboring Anglo-Saxon territories of Hwicce and the Magonsæte. These were what we today would call Gloucestershire, Herefordshire and Worcestershire. At that time there was no single English ruler as the country was divided up into seven different Anglo-Saxon kingdoms. Within these petty kingdoms three major power blocs emerged and these were Wessex in the South, Northumbria in the North and Offa’s Mercia in the middle. Offa took advantage of Mercia’s central position within England to extend his influence over a larger and larger geographic area with each passing decade. After securing his control over Merica, Offa went on to take advantage of instability within the Saxon kingdom of Kent to establish himself as overlord there too. The Mercians and Kentishmen fought a battle at Otford in 776AD but the outcome of the battle is not a matter of historical record. He had also gained control of Sussex by 771AD. At the height of his power in the 780s he extended Mercian supremacy over most of southern England. He allied himself with King Beorhtric of Wessex, who was married to Offa's daughter. Some accounts suggest that at this stage the King of Wessex recognised Offa as his overlord. We do know for certain that Offa became the overlord of East Anglia and had the King of East Anglia beheaded in 794AD. This was possibly for rebelling against him but we do not know the real reason for certain. However despite being a Christian king Offa came into conflict with the Church. He would not be the first or the last English ruler to be involved in such a dispute. It is interesting for us as members of the Commemorative Order of Thomas of Acon to note that Offa’s conflict with the English Church stemmed from a dispute with the Archbishop of Canterbury of the day. The Archbishop was churchman known as Jænberht. The basis of the argument was the Archbishop’s refusal to consecrate Offa’s son, Ecgfrith, as future King of Merica. Perhaps Offa would have been tempted to utter those eternal words ‘Who will rid me of this troublesome priest?’ Offa is also credited with introducing the silver penny as the basis of English coinage and 240AD silver pennies were deemed equivalent to one troy pound of silver. His financial reforms were the foundation stone for the nation’s coinage for hundreds of years thereafter. Many surviving coins from Offa's reign carry elegant depictions of him. Some of his coins carry images of his wife, Cynethryth. She was said to be the only Anglo- Saxon queen ever to be depicted on any coin. Many historians regard Offa as the most powerful Anglo-Saxon king before Alfred the Great. However his dominance never extended to the northern Anglo-Saxon Kingdom of Northumbria, though he gave one of his daughters in marriage to the Northumbrian King Æthelred I in 792AD. Historians once saw his reign as part of a process leading to a unified England but this is no longer the typically held view. In the words of Professor Simon Keynes of Cambridge University "Offa was driven by a lust for power, not a vision of English unity; and what he left was a reputation, not a legacy." Offa left no lasting dynastic legacy because his son ruled for only 141 days as king and replaced by a distant relative. Professor Keynes’ view therefore appears to be both accurate and correct. However the power and prestige that Offa attained in his lifetime secured him long lasting fame and it is fair to describe him as one of the most significant rulers Anglo-Saxon England. Unfortunately no contemporary biography of Offa survives. A key source of information for this period of English history is the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. A page from the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. The Chronicle was created in Wessex in the time of King Alfred and copies were distributed to different monasteries and abbeys around England. These copies were updated by different authors at different times and in different locations. Given its origins this source is thought to be biased in favour of the rulers of Wessex and therefore may not be an accurately account of what was truly achieved by Offa. He was after all a Mercian ruler and not a Wessex King. His influence also spread beyond Anglo-Saxon England itself. In Wales we know all too well about Offa’s Dyke. It was almost certainly built in his reign and still stands today as a testimony to the extensive resources Offa had at his command and his ability to organize them effectively. It is assumed to have been built because Offa was frequently in conflict with the various Welsh kingdoms along his Western border. There was a battle between the Mercians and the Welsh at Hereford in 760AD and Offa is recorded as campaigning against the Welsh in 778AD, 784AD and 796AD in the 10th century Annales Cambriae. This was a Latin account of events of the time written by Welsh Churchmen at St David’s. As a result of these numerous wars Offa constructed a great earthen barrier that runs approximately along the border between England and Wales. It is mentioned by the Welsh monk Asser in his biography of King Alfred "A certain vigorous king called Offa ... had a great dyke built between Wales and Mercia from sea to sea" Most historians find no reason to doubt Asser's attribution. Early names for the dyke in both Welsh and English also support the view that it was built by King Offa. Despite Asser's claim that the dyke ran "from sea to sea" it is currently thought that the original structure only covered about two-thirds of the length of the border. In the north it ends near Llanfynydd which is less than five miles from the coast, while in the south it stops at Rushock Hill, near Kington in Herefordshire which is of course a number of miles inland. The total length of this section of dyke is about 64 miles. Other earthworks also exist along the Welsh border and of these Wat's Dyke is one of the largest. However it is not possible to date them relative to each other and so it cannot be accurately determined whether Offa's Dyke was a copy of or the inspiration for the construction Wat's Dyke. It would seem that the debate here would be similar to that over the origins of the ‘Chicken or the Egg’. The construction of the dyke suggests that it was built to create an effective barrier and to command views into Wales. This in turn implies that Offa was free to choose the best location for the dyke. There were 8th century settlements to the west of the dyke that had names that imply they were English. It may be that in choosing the location of the barrier the Mercians were surrendering some territory to Welsh. Alternatively it may be that these settlements had already been retaken by the Welsh, implying a defensive role for Offa’s barrier. The effort and expense that must have gone into building the dyke are impressive and suggest that the king who had it built (be that Offa or someone else) had considerable resources at his disposal. A further theory is that a number of earthwork dykes and defenses existed dotted along the Mercian / Wales border before Offa became king. Offa may have joined these previous constructions together with sections of his own dyke filling in the gaps left by previous Anglo-Saxon rulers. Given that this era was what was once called ‘The Dark Ages’ we may never truly know. Offa's diplomatic relations with Europe are documented for posterity but appear to belong only to the last dozen years of his reign. In about 789AD King Charlemagne proposed that his son, Charles, marry one of Offa's daughters. Offa countered with a request that his son, Ecgfrith, should also marry Charlemagne's daughter Bertha. Charlemagne was however outraged by the request and broke off contact with England. He even banned English ships from landing in his ports. In 796AD Charlemagne wrote to Offa and this correspondence between the two kings produced the first surviving documents in English diplomatic history.
Recommended publications
  • THE KINGDOM and COINS of BURGRED. HE Anglo-Saxon
    THE KINGDOM AND COINS OF BURGRED. BY NATHAN HEYWOOD. HE Anglo-Saxon kingdom of Mercia became tributary to Egbert, King of Wessex, on the death of Ludica, A.D. 825, and was afterwards governed successively by Wiglaf, 825-839 ; Bertulf, 839-852 ; and Burgred, 852-874. Burgred married Aethelswith, a daughter of Ethelwlf, King of Wessex, grand- daughter <if Egbert, and the sister of Ethelred I. and Alfred the Great, successive kings of Wessex.1 When Burgred came to the throne the Danes were in occupation of southern Mercia,3 but during the first year of his reign they were driven out by ^Fkhelwlf and the West Saxons, who thereupon joined the Mercian forces, under the personal command of Burgred, in subduing the Welsh.3 Having at length obtained complete possession of his dominions he ruled in peace until 866, when the Danes in overwhelming numbers invaded East Anglia and wintered o o there.4 In the following year, 867, the enemy commenced the campaign 1 " And upon this [subjugation of North-Welsh] after Easter Ethelwlf, King of West Saxons, gave his daughter to Burgred, King of Mercia." Sax. Ch. 14. 2 " And the same year (851) came three hundred and forty ships to Thames mouth and the crews landed and broke into Canterbury and London, and put to flight Beorhtwulf, King of the Mercians, with his army." Sax. Ch. 12. 3 " Here Burhred, King of the Mercians, and his witan begged of King yEthelwlf that he would assist him so that he might make the North-Welsh obedient to him.
    [Show full text]
  • First Evidence of Farming Appears; Stone Axes, Antler Combs, Pottery in Common Use
    BC c.5000 - Neolithic (new stone age) Period begins; first evidence of farming appears; stone axes, antler combs, pottery in common use. c.4000 - Construction of the "Sweet Track" (named for its discoverer, Ray Sweet) begun; many similar raised, wooden walkways were constructed at this time providing a way to traverse the low, boggy, swampy areas in the Somerset Levels, near Glastonbury; earliest-known camps or communities appear (ie. Hembury, Devon). c.3500-3000 - First appearance of long barrows and chambered tombs; at Hambledon Hill (Dorset), the primitive burial rite known as "corpse exposure" was practiced, wherein bodies were left in the open air to decompose or be consumed by animals and birds. c.3000-2500 - Castlerigg Stone Circle (Cumbria), one of Britain's earliest and most beautiful, begun; Pentre Ifan (Dyfed), a classic example of a chambered tomb, constructed; Bryn Celli Ddu (Anglesey), known as the "mound in the dark grove," begun, one of the finest examples of a "passage grave." c.2500 - Bronze Age begins; multi-chambered tombs in use (ie. West Kennet Long Barrow) first appearance of henge "monuments;" construction begun on Silbury Hill, Europe's largest prehistoric, man-made hill (132 ft); "Beaker Folk," identified by the pottery beakers (along with other objects) found in their single burial sites. c.2500-1500 - Most stone circles in British Isles erected during this period; pupose of the circles is uncertain, although most experts speculate that they had either astronomical or ritual uses. c.2300 - Construction begun on Britain's largest stone circle at Avebury. c.2000 - Metal objects are widely manufactured in England about this time, first from copper, then with arsenic and tin added; woven cloth appears in Britain, evidenced by findings of pins and cloth fasteners in graves; construction begun on Stonehenge's inner ring of bluestones.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Cabinet Crisis Kingdom of Mercia
    Joint Cabinet Crisis Kingdom of Mercia Hamburg Model United Nations “Shaping a New Era of Diplomacy” 28th November – 1st December 2019 JCC – Kingdom of Mercia Hamburg Model United Nations Study Guide 28th November – 1st December Welcome Letter by the Secretary Generals Dear Delegates, we, the secretariat of HamMUN 2019, would like to give a warm welcome to all of you that have come from near and far to participate in the 21st Edition of Hamburg Model United Nations. We hope to give you an enriching and enlightening experience that you can look back on with joy. Over the course of 4 days in total, you are going to try to find solutions for some of the most challenging problems our world faces today. Together with students from all over the world, you will hear opinions that might strongly differ from your own, or present your own divergent opinion. We hope that you take this opportunity to widen your horizon, to, in a respectful manner, challenge and be challenged and form new friendships. With this year’s slogan “Shaping a New Era of Democracy” we would like to invite you to engage in and develop peaceful ways to solve and prevent conflicts. To remain respectful and considerate in diplomatic negotiations in a time where we experience our political climate as rough, and to focus on what unites us rather than divides us. As we are moving towards an even more globalized and highly military armed world, facing unprecedented threats such as climate change and Nuclear Warfare, international cooperation has become more important than ever to ensure peace and stability.
    [Show full text]
  • Wessex and the Reign of Edmund Ii Ironside
    Chapter 16 Wessex and the Reign of Edmund ii Ironside David McDermott Edmund Ironside, the eldest surviving son of Æthelred ii (‘the Unready’), is an often overlooked political figure. This results primarily from the brevity of his reign, which lasted approximately seven months, from 23 April to 30 November 1016. It could also be said that Edmund’s legacy compares unfavourably with those of his forebears. Unlike other Anglo-Saxon Kings of England whose lon- ger reigns and periods of uninterrupted peace gave them opportunities to leg- islate, renovate the currency or reform the Church, Edmund’s brief rule was dominated by the need to quell initial domestic opposition to his rule, and prevent a determined foreign adversary seizing the throne. Edmund conduct- ed his kingship under demanding circumstances and for his resolute, indefati- gable and mostly successful resistance to Cnut, his career deserves to be dis- cussed and his successes acknowledged. Before discussing the importance of Wessex for Edmund Ironside, it is con- structive, at this stage, to clarify what is meant by ‘Wessex’. It is also fitting to use the definition of the region provided by Barbara Yorke. The core shires of Wessex may be reliably regarded as Devon, Somerset, Dorset, Wiltshire, Berk- shire and Hampshire (including the Isle of Wight).1 Following the victory of the West Saxon King Ecgbert at the battle of Ellendun (Wroughton, Wilts.) in 835, the borders of Wessex expanded, with the counties of Kent, Sussex, Surrey and Essex passing from Mercian to West Saxon control.2 Wessex was not the only region with which Edmund was associated, and nor was he the only king from the royal House of Wessex with connections to other regions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anglo-Saxon Kingdom of Mercia and the Origins and Distribution of Common Fields*
    The Anglo-Saxon kingdom of Mercia and the origins and distribution of common fields* by Susan Oosthuizen Abstract: This paper aims to explore the hypothesis that the agricultural layouts and organisation that had de- veloped into common fields by the high middle ages may have had their origins in the ‘long’ eighth century, between about 670 and 840 AD. It begins by reiterating the distinction between medieval open and common fields, and the problems that inhibit current explanations for their period of origin and distribution. The distribution of common fields is reviewed and the coincidence with the kingdom of Mercia noted. Evidence pointing towards an earlier date for the origin of fields is reviewed. Current views of Mercia in the ‘long’ eighth century are discussed and it is shown that the kingdom had both the cultural and economic vitality to implement far-reaching landscape organisation. The proposition that early forms of these field systems may have originated in the ‘long’ eighth century is considered, and the paper concludes with suggestions for further research. Open and common fields (a specialised form of open field) endured in the English landscape for over a thousand years and their physical remains still survive in many places. A great deal is known and understood about their distribution and physical appearance, about their man- agement from their peak in the thirteenth century through the changes of the later medieval and early modern periods, and about how and when they disappeared. Their origins, however, present a continuing problem partly, at least, because of the difficulties in extrapolating in- formation about such beginnings from documentary sources and upstanding earthworks that record – or fossilise – mature or even late field systems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Demo Version
    Æbucurnig Dynbær Edinburgh Coldingham c. 638 to Northumbria 8. England and Wales GODODDIN HOLY ISLAND Lindisfarne Tuidi Bebbanburg about 600 Old Melrose Ad Gefring Anglo-Saxon Kingdom NORTH CHANNEL of Northumbria BERNICIA STRATHCLYDE 633 under overlordship Buthcæster Corebricg Gyruum * of Northumbria æt Rægeheafde Mote of Mark Tyne Anglo-Saxon Kingdom Caerluel of Mercia Wear Luce Solway Firth Bay NORTHHYMBRA RICE Other Anglo-Saxon united about 604 Kingdoms Streonæshalch RHEGED Tese Cetreht British kingdoms MANAW Hefresham c 624–33 to Northumbria Rye MYRCNA Tribes DEIRA Ilecliue Eoforwic NORTH IRISH Aire Rippel ELMET Ouse SEA SEA 627 to Northumbria æt Bearwe Humbre c 627 to Northumbria Trent Ouestræfeld LINDESEGE c 624–33 to Northumbria TEGEINGL Gæignesburh Rhuddlan Mærse PEC- c 600 Dublin MÔN HOLY ISLAND Llanfaes Deganwy c 627 to Northumbria SÆTE to Mercia Lindcylene RHOS Saint Legaceaster Bangor Asaph Cair Segeint to Badecarnwiellon GWYNEDD WREOCAN- IRELAND Caernarvon SÆTE Bay DUNODING MIERCNA RICE Rapendun The Wash c 700 to Mercia * Usa NORTHFOLC Byrtun Elmham MEIRIONNYDD MYRCNA Northwic Cardigan Rochecestre Liccidfeld Stanford Walle TOMSÆTE MIDDIL Bay POWYS Medeshamstede Tamoworthig Ligoraceaster EAST ENGLA RICE Sæfern PENCERSÆTE WATLING STREET ENGLA * WALES MAGON- Theodford Llanbadarn Fawr GWERTH-MAELIENYDD Dommoceaster (?) RYNION RICE SÆTE Huntandun SUTHFOLC Hamtun c 656 to Mercia Beodericsworth CEREDIGION Weogornaceaster Bedanford Grantanbrycg BUELLT ELFAEL HECANAS Persore Tovecestre Headleage Rendlæsham Eofeshamm + Hereford c 600 GipeswicSutton Hoo EUIAS Wincelcumb to Mercia EAST PEBIDIOG ERGING Buccingahamm Sture mutha Saint Davids BRYCHEINIOG Gleawanceaster HWICCE Heorotford SEAXNA SAINT GEORGE’SSaint CHANNEL DYFED 577 to Wessex Ægelesburg * Brides GWENT 628 to Mercia Wæclingaceaster Hetfelle RICE Ythancæstir Llanddowror Waltham Bay Cirenceaster Dorchecestre GLYWYSING Caerwent Wealingaford WÆCLINGAS c.
    [Show full text]
  • Aethelflaed: History and Legend
    Quidditas Volume 34 Article 2 2013 Aethelflaed: History and Legend Kim Klimek Metropolitan State University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Renaissance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Klimek, Kim (2013) "Aethelflaed: History and Legend," Quidditas: Vol. 34 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra/vol34/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quidditas by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Quidditas 34 (2013) 11 Aethelflaed: History and Legend Kim Klimek Metropolitan State University of Denver This paper examines the place of Aethelflaed, Queen of the Mercians, in the written historical record. Looking at works like the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle and the Irish Annals, we find a woman whose rule acted as both a complement to and a corruption against the consolidations of Alfred the Great and Edward’s rule in Anglo-Saxon England. The alternative histories written by the Mercians and the Celtic areas of Ireland and Wales show us an alternative view to the colonization and solidification of West-Saxon rule. Introduction Aethelflaed, Queen and Lady of the Mercians, ruled the Anglo-Sax- on kingdom of Mercia from 911–918. Despite the deaths of both her husband and father and increasing Danish invasions into Anglo- Saxon territory, Aethelflaed not only held her territory but expanded it. She was a warrior queen whose Mercian army followed her west to fight the Welsh and north to attack the Danes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Romans and York
    FACTSHEET 20 THE ROMANS AND YORK The Foundation of York Much of southern and eastern Britain had been The Romans are generally thought to have conquered by this time but Eboracum was to be founded the city of York, but it is possible that the main headquarters for the troops who were there was a native Celtic settlement here before trying to conquer the rest. It was defended by they arrived. The name that the Romans gave the two rivers and could be supplied by sea because site was Eboracum, which, to them, meant “Place it was possible to bring large vessels up the Ouse. of the wild boar”, but this is possibly a Later, the defences were strengthened by misunderstanding of an original Celtic name Govenor Agricola, but it was not until early in the meaning “Eburo’s place.” What is certain is that second century that the timber palisade was re‐ in AD 71 the Emperor Vespasian sent a new built in stone by the Sixth Legion. (Precisely what military governor to Britain, Petillius Cerialis, with happened to the Ninth has always been some‐ instructions to subdue the Brigantines, a thing of a mystery). These defences were again powerful tribe occupying much of what is now reconstructed in about AD 200. The final northern England. The Queen of the Brigantines, developments occurred about a century later Cartimundia, was facing rebellion led by her when most of the defences were remodelled. husband Venutius. The Romans took advantage This was when the great multiangular corner of the situation by intervening in order to tower, still visible in the Museum Gardens, was gain overall control.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and Moral Authority in the Carolingian Age (2016)
    NOTICE: The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of reproductions of copyrighted material. One specified condition is that the reproduction is not to be "used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research." If a user makes a request for, or later uses a reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement. RESTRICTIONS: This student work may be read, quoted from, cited, for purposes of research. It may not be published in full except by permission of the author. 1 INTRODUCTION The common people call the place, both the spring and the village, Fontenoy, Where that massacre and bloody downfall of the Franks [took place]: The fields tremble, the woods tremble, the very swamp trembles… Let not that accursed day be counted in the calendar of the year, Rather let it be erased from all memory, May the sun’s rays never fall there, may no dawn ever come to [end its endless] twilight. -Englebert, 8411 The Battle of Fontenoy in 841 left the Carolingian Empire devastated. It was the only battle of a three-year civil war that left too many dead and the survivors, shattered. During this period of unrest, from 840-843, an aristocratic woman, Dhuoda, endured the most difficult years of her life. The loyalty of her absentee husband, Bernard of Septimania, was being questioned by one of the three kings fighting for an upper-hand in this bloody civil war. To ensure his loyalty, his and Dhuoda’s 14-year old son, William, was to be sent to King Charles the Bald as a hostage.
    [Show full text]
  • And Myths of Rome's Second Augusta Legion and St Augustine's 'Oak'
    Trans. Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society 129 (2011), 117–137 Aust (Gloucestershire) and Myths of Rome’s Second Augusta Legion and St Augustine’s ‘Oak’ Conference By DAVID H. HIGGINS Introduction Aust in Gloucestershire has long attracted speculation over the origin of its name. The two favoured hypotheses offer an alternative: either (a) this minor ferry terminus with its settlement was named by (or after) the Second Augusta Legion of the Roman army which, stationed in full strength at Isca-Caerleon between c. 78 AD and the 3rd century, would have regularly crossed the Severn estuary from Sedbury to Aust (Augusta the claimed origin of the place-name) in order to access the main Abona (Sea Mills) to Glevum (Gloucester) artery; or (b) was named in memory of the Roman churchman St Augustine (in the later Middle Ages popularly contracted to ‘Austin’) of Canterbury who, in 603 AD (traditional date), held a conference allegedly at or hard by Aust, beneath a landmark oak tree, with leaders of the Christian Church of the autonomous British kingdom nearest to the recently converted Anglo-Saxon Kingdom of Kent.1 The object of Augustine’s conference was to bring about uniformity of practice between the indigenous church of post- Roman Britain and the historic Christian church established by St Peter in the ancient capital of the Roman world. The major subjects of dispute were the British dating of Easter and the form of the baptismal rite (both, the Roman Church urged, should be Roman) and, in addition, Augustine required that the British, although understandably reluctant, should undertake the evangelisation of the pagan Anglo-Saxon invaders of their land.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anglo-Saxon and Norman "Eigenkirche" and the Ecclesiastical Policy of William I
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1981 The Anglo-Saxon and Norman "Eigenkirche" and the Ecclesiastical Policy of William I. Albert Simeon Cote Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Cote, Albert Simeon Jr, "The Anglo-Saxon and Norman "Eigenkirche" and the Ecclesiastical Policy of William I." (1981). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 3675. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/3675 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “ Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Developing a Collection Plan
    A Guide to Developing a Collection Plan LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT GUIDE # 6 © December 2009 Southern Ontario Library Service A Guide to Developing a Collection Plan The Library Development Guide Series Developing a Collection Plan The Library Development Guide #6 Prepared by Hélène Golden and Peggy Malcolm Southern Ontario Library Service December 2009 The Library Development Guide Series A Guide to Developing a Collection Plan Contents INTRODUCTION TO COLLECTION PLANNING........................................................... 3 a) Setting the groundwork.........................................................................................................3 b) The Rationale for having a collection plan............................................................................6 c) Steps in the collection plan ..................................................................................................7 STEP 1– EXAMINE THE COMMUNITY ......................................................................... 8 a) What does a community assessment include?.....................................................................9 b) Methods of assessing the collection needs of your community............................................9 i. Collecting statistical data..................................................................................................10 ii. Conducting surveys .........................................................................................................12 iii. Holding small group discussions or focus groups
    [Show full text]