DOCSLIB.ORG

Advocate-Vol 14-No 4-Entire Issue (6-1992)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

June, 1992 Volume 14, Number 4 THE ADVOCATE The Kentucky Department of Public Advocacy’s Journal of Criminal Justice Education and Research ! I3iç::çf tGe64tZ kepriniã by pennissii of Dts Moin RegSer .nd AMISL 20th Our Specialty is Criminal Defense Litigation Anniversary The Kentucky Department of Public Advocacy DPA is a state-wide public defender program thai was established at the recommendation of Governor Wendell Ford by the 1972 Kentucky General . Assembly. There are over 100 full-time public defenders in 16 offices across the state covering 40 Department of Public . Advocacy counties. Another 250 attorneys do pail-time public defender work in 80 of Kentucky s 120 lies. EVA is an independent agency located within the state’s Pmtection andRegulation Cabinet for administrative purposes. A Public Advocacy Commission oversees the Department. Yearly, DPA represents In excess of 101,000 poor citizens accused of crimes for offenses ranging from DU! to 1972-1992 capital murder. Day in and day out our attorneys and staff bring life to the individual liberties guaranteed by our United States and Kentucky Constitutions. The Kentucky Department of Public Advocacy is Kentucky’s statewide FROM THE EDITOR: public defender program dedicated to providing high quality legal repre We see ourselves as standing out in all of history as a people who cherish and protect sentation for Kentucky’s citizens freedom more than any other people. Our individual freedoms are insured through who are poor and accusedof commit our Bill of Rights of our United States Constitution and subsequent constitutional ting a crime. amendments like the 14th amendment with its due process and equal protection rights, and through the Bill ofRights of our Kentucky Constitution. December 15, Over 101,000 Kentucky citizens are 1992 is the 201st Anniversary of the United States Bill ofRights. September 28, served by the Department each year 1992 is the 101st Anniversary of the Kentucky Constitution’sBill ofRights. in an effort to insure advocacy root ing out injustice. SPECIAL RECOGNITION ANII A LIBERTY RESOURCE The Advocate is a bi-monthly publi This very special issue of our magazine celebrates these defining values, reminds us cation of the Department of Public of the historical reasons for the development of these precise individual protections, Advocacy, an independent agency and brings together rich resources and thinking for current and future use by within the Public Protection and Kentucky’s criminal justice system and by Kentucky’s leaders and teachers. We Regulation Cabinet. know of no current Kentucky resource of this magnitude which brings together so much information on our liberties. In addition to our regular criminal justice readers, Opinions expressed in articles are this issue of our magazine goes to every Kentucky school, over 1,000. Hopefully, it those of the authors and do not nec will be used for many years as a ready resource for our education system. Together, essarily represent the views of DPA. we need to work to remind ourselves and to remind the future beneficiaries and iniplementers of the origin and importance the guarantees of our fundamental freedoms. The Advocate welcomes correspon dence on subjects covered by it. If WHEN IS LIBERTY MOST AT STAKE? you have an article our readers will find of interest, type a short outline or The raw power ofgovernment vs. a person’s liberty takes on its most dramatic battle general description and send it to the when the state, through a prosecutor, seeks to imprison or kill a fellow citizen for Editor. conduct claimed to be criminal. The extent to which that criminal process is fair is the extent to which we really value liberty in our society. Copyright © 1992, Department of Public Advocacy. All rightsreserved. WHO IMPLEMENTS OUR RIGHTS? No part may be reproduced without written permission from DPA. Per Rights on paper are meaningless. They must be put into effect by someone. A criminal mission for separately copyrighted defense attorney or a public defender stands representing a citizen-accused against articles must be obtained from that the state’s desire to seize the liberty or life of one of its own. Defenders are the persons copyright holder. who implement the Bill ofRights, perhaps more than any other person in our society, when they stand up and defend an individual against the power of government. Let’s EDITORS recognize this, appreciate it, and remind others of how much we appreciate those who are willing to stand up for the poor, the outcast, the marginalized, and even the Edward C. Monahan, Editor 1984 - Present guilty and defenseless. The degree to which the state can take liberty from one of the Erwin W. Lewis, Editor 1978 - 1983 least of us is the degree to which our real liberty is at risk. As Martin Luther King Cris Brown, Managing Editor, 1983 - Present Tona Rhea, Graphics, Layout & Design has reminded us in his Letter from the Birmingham Jail, "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Sometime this year pat a Bill ofRights patriot on the Contributing Editors back and thank them for fostering our freedoms. The liberty we enjoy is a product of their efforts. Linda K. West west’s Review Allison Connelly Post-Conviction PRODUCED THROUGH MUCH GENEROSITY Steve Mirkin Death Penalty Donna Boyce 6th Circuit HighlighLs Ernie Lewis Plain View This issue is published through the enormous generosity of two donors: 1 an Dan Goyette Ethics individual who prefers to remain anonymous, and who was attracted to donating Rob Riley in the Trenches $7,500 because of the special nature of this issue and its distribution to Kentucky’s David Niebaus Evidence Dave Norat Ask Corrections schools; and 2 The Kentucky Bar Foundation which has given DPA a $2,800 grant. Mike Williams F.Y.I. The Kentucky Bar Foundation is committed to improving the administration of Barbara Sutherland Infonnacion Resourcc Justice, educating the public about the legal system and enhancing the image of the profession. Its officers are: Carroll M. Redford, Jr., President; Robert W. Kellerman, President-Elect; William]. Kathman, Jr., Vice President; Thomas E. Turner, Secre Department or Public Advocacy tary[Freasurer; Carol M. Palmore, Immediate Past President. The opinions ex 1264 Louisville Road pressed are those of and not necessarily represent the views of The Franktort, KY 40601 the authors, do 502 564-8006 Bar Foundation or our anonymous donor. We are indebted to our donors for their 800 582-1671 immense generosity which will result in the education of many Kentuckians for the FAX # 502 564-7890 next generation on the essential nature of our liberty. ED MONAI-IAN JUNE 1992 IThe Advocate 2 FEATURES CHAPTER 1: 4 GEORGE NICHOLAS, FATHER OF KENTUCKY’S B114. OFRJGHTS by Dr. Thomas B. Clark 6 THE TEXT OF THE KENTUCKY BILL OFRIGHTS 1722, 1799, 1850 8 CHAPTER 2: 11 THE KENTUCKY BILL OFRIGHTS by Dr. Thomas D. Clark l3 THE BILL OF RIGHTS: OLD LESSONS AND NEW CHALLENGES by Pmfessor larks J. Ogletree 17 THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT THE MOST PRECIOUS BATFLE PLAN: THE BILL OF RIGHTS by Judith G. Clabes 21 GEORGE MASON, FATHER OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION by Judge John D. Miller 24 CHAPTER 3: 30 USING KENTUCKY’S BILL OFRIGHTS IN CRIMINAL CASES by Frank Heft 31 STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CASES REPORTED, 1987- 91 STATE CONSTITUTIONS AND THE CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER by John H. Hingson Ill 35 USING KENTUCKY’S SECTION lOby Ernie Lewis 40 USING KENTUCKY’S CONSTITUTION TO CHALLENGE EVIDENCE PRACTICES 44 by David Niehaus THOMAS JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS 51 LRC’s 1987 SPECIAL COMMISSION OF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW’S BILL OF RIGHTS RECOMENDATIONS 52 INTERPRETING THE CONSTITUTION 68 CHAPTER 4: 69 THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM by Roy Moore 70 CHAPTER 5: 77 THE RIGHT TO TESTIFY: THE NEWEST RIGHT by Timothy P. O’Neill - 79 CHAPTER 6: 85 TIlE COMPULSORY CLAUSE by Edward J. Imwinkelried 86 CHAPTER 7: 92 DOUBLE JEOPARDY by Rob Sexton CHAPTER 8: 98 THE RIGHT it ThIAL BY JURY by Rebecca DiLoreto 99 THE JURY ASSEMBLED by William A. Pangman 101 A NATURAL HISTORY OF THE FULLY INFORMED JURY ASSOCIATION by Don Doig 109 ANSWERING THE HARD QUESTIONS ABOUT FIJA by Lany Dodge Ill CHAPTER 9: 114 SECTION 2 OF THE KENTUCKY CONSTITUTION by Allison Connelly 115 CHAPTER 10: 118 OBSERVATIONS ABOUT THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL by JudgeEdward H. Johnstone 119 THE RIGHT TOCOUNSEL: ATRISK FOR KENTUCKY’S POOR by Ed Monahan 122 FREE CQUNSEL: A RIGHT, NOT A CHARITYby Jim Neuhard 126 CHRONOLOGY OF BICENTENNIAL DATES RELATED TOTHE RATIFICATION OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS 130 CHAPTER 11: 131 BEYOND THE BATTERED CONST1TUTIONby Nickolas Facaros 133 THE IMPORTANCE OF CIVIL LIBERTIES it THE FBI by William S. Sessions 136 AMERICA’S UNFUNNIEST HOME VIDEO 139 PRIVACY AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS Milton Hirsch 140 CHAPTER 12: 147 DO THE GUILTY GOFREE? by Robert Carran 148 HOW CAN YOU DEFEND THOSE CROOKS? by fed S. Rakoff 150 ANATOMY OF A CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER by Emmett Colvin 153 REFLECTIONS ON CRIMINAL DEFENSE WORK by John Delgado 156 HE WAS FAITHFUL: WILLIAM H. SEWARD 158 CHAPTER 13: 159 RACE, SENTENCING AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE by Randolph N. Stone 161 REFORMING A DISCRIMINATORY CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM by Scott Wallace 163 CONSTITUTION CAME UP SHORT ON MATTER OF EQUALITY by Eleanor Holmes Norton 167 CHAPTER i4: 168 CHILDREN AND THE CONSTTTUTION by Barbara M. Hoithaus 169 CHAPTER 15: 172 THE FIFTH AMENDMENT by Keith Moore 173 JUNE 1992 IThe Advocate 3 HAPTER 1 flTnq3Lqi We, tile peopte of tIle Commonwealth offJCentucy,gratefuto tile 9ln4qhlty godfor civil, political, and re4qious liberties we enjoy, and invoicing tile continuance of these blessings, do ordain and establish this Constitution.
Recommended publications
  • Kentucky Lawyer, 1993

    Kentucky Lawyer, 1993

    KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF LAW-1993 APANTHEON OF DEANS: Tom Lewis, Bob Lawson, David Shipley and Bill' Campbell Ci David Shipley becomes Dean of the College of Law he College of Law welcomes David E. fall. His areas of legal expertise are copyright and ad­ Shipley as its new dean, effective July 1, ministrative law. His most recent publication is a 1993. Dean Shipley comes to us from the casebook, Copyright Law: Cases and Materials, West ~---~ University of Mississippi School of Law, Publishing 1992, with co-authors Howard Abrams of the where he served as Dean and Director of the Law Center University of Detroit School of Law and Sheldon for the last three years. Halpern of Ohio State University. Shipley also has Dean Shipley was raised in Champaign, Illinois, and published two editions of a treatise on administrative was graduated from University High School at the Uni­ procedure in South Carolina entitled South Carolina versity of Illinois. He received his B.A. degree with Administrative Law. He has taught Civil Procedure, Highest Honors in American History from Oberlin Col- Remedies, Domestic Relations and Intellectual Property lege in 1972, and is as well as Copyright and Administrative Law. In addi­ a 1975 graduate of tion, he has participated in a wide variety of activities the University of and functions sponsored by the South Carolina and Mis­ Chicago Law sissippi bars. School, where he Dean Shipley enjoys reading best-selling novels by was Executive authors such as Grisham, Crichton, Turow and Clancy as Editor of the Uni­ well as history books about the Civil War.
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 111 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

    Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 111 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 111 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 155 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, JANUARY 12, 2009 No. 6 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 13, 2009, at 12:30 p.m. Senate MONDAY, JANUARY 12, 2009 The Senate met at 2 p.m. and was The legislative clerk read the fol- was represented in the Senate of the called to order by the Honorable JIM lowing letter: United States by a terrific man and a WEBB, a Senator from the Common- U.S. SENATE, great legislator, Wendell Ford. wealth of Virginia. PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, Senator Ford was known by all as a Washington, DC, January 12, 2009. moderate, deeply respected by both PRAYER To the Senate: sides of the aisle for putting progress The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, ahead of politics. Senator Ford, some of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby fered the following prayer: appoint the Honorable JIM WEBB, a Senator said, was not flashy. He did not seek Let us pray. from the Commonwealth of Virginia, to per- the limelight. He was quietly effective Almighty God, from whom, through form the duties of the Chair. and calmly deliberative. whom, and to whom all things exist, ROBERT C. BYRD, In 1991, Senator Ford was elected by shower Your blessings upon our Sen- President pro tempore. his colleagues to serve as Democratic ators.
  • Reform and Reaction: Education Policy in Kentucky

    Reform and Reaction: Education Policy in Kentucky

    Reform and Reaction Education Policy in Kentucky By Timothy Collins Copyright © 2017 By Timothy Collins Permission to download this e-book is granted for educational and nonprofit use only. Quotations shall be made with appropriate citation that includes credit to the author and the Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs, Western Illinois University. Published by the Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs, Western Illinois University in cooperation with Then and Now Media, Bushnell, IL ISBN – 978-0-9977873-0-6 Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs Stipes Hall 518 Western Illinois University 1 University Circle Macomb, IL 61455-1390 www.iira.org Then and Now Media 976 Washington Blvd. Bushnell IL, 61422 www.thenandnowmedia.com Cover Photos “Colored School” at Anthoston, Henderson County, Kentucky, 1916. http://www.loc.gov/pictures/ item/ncl2004004792/PP/ Beechwood School, Kenton County Kentucky, 1896. http://www.rootsweb.ancestry. com/~kykenton/beechwood.school.html Washington Junior High School at Paducah, McCracken County, Kentucky, 1950s. http://www. topix.com/album/detail/paducah-ky/V627EME3GKF94BGN Table of Contents Preface vii Acknowledgements ix 1 Reform and Reaction: Fragmentation and Tarnished 1 Idylls 2 Reform Thwarted: The Trap of Tradition 13 3 Advent for Reform: Moving Toward a Minimum 30 Foundation 4 Reluctant Reform: A.B. ‘Happy” Chandler, 1955-1959 46 5 Dollars for Reform: Bert T. Combs, 1959-1963 55 6 Reform and Reluctant Liberalism: Edward T. Breathitt, 72 1963-1967 7 Reform and Nunn’s Nickle: Louie B. Nunn, 1967-1971 101 8 Child-focused Reform: Wendell H. Ford, 1971-1974 120 9 Reform and Falling Flat: Julian Carroll, 1974-1979 141 10 Silent Reformer: John Y.
  • Divide and Dissent: Kentucky Politics, 1930-1963

    Divide and Dissent: Kentucky Politics, 1930-1963

    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Political History History 1987 Divide and Dissent: Kentucky Politics, 1930-1963 John Ed Pearce Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Pearce, John Ed, "Divide and Dissent: Kentucky Politics, 1930-1963" (1987). Political History. 3. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_political_history/3 Divide and Dissent This page intentionally left blank DIVIDE AND DISSENT KENTUCKY POLITICS 1930-1963 JOHN ED PEARCE THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY Publication of this volume was made possible in part by a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities. Copyright © 1987 by The University Press of Kentucky Paperback edition 2006 The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine University, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Historical Society, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University,Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. All rights reserved. Editorial and Sales Qffices: The University Press of Kentucky 663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008 www.kentuckypress.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Pearce,John Ed. Divide and dissent. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Kentucky-Politics and government-1865-1950.
  • “The Wisest Radical of All”: Reelection (September-November, 1864)

    “The Wisest Radical of All”: Reelection (September-November, 1864)

    Chapter Thirty-four “The Wisest Radical of All”: Reelection (September-November, 1864) The political tide began turning on August 29 when the Democratic national convention met in Chicago, where Peace Democrats were unwilling to remain in the background. Lincoln had accurately predicted that the delegates “must nominate a Peace Democrat on a war platform, or a War Democrat on a peace platform; and I personally can’t say that I care much which they do.”1 The convention took the latter course, nominating George McClellan for president and adopting a platform which declared the war “four years of failure” and demanded that “immediate efforts be made for a cessation of hostilities, with a view to an ultimate convention of the states, or other peaceable means, to the end that, at the earliest practicable moment, peace may be restored on the basis of the Federal Union of the States.” This “peace plank,” the handiwork of Clement L. Vallandigham, implicitly rejected Lincoln’s Niagara Manifesto; the Democrats would require only union as a condition for peace, whereas the Republicans insisted on union and emancipation. The platform also called for the restoration of “the rights of the States 1 Noah Brooks, Washington, D.C., in Lincoln’s Time, ed. Herbert Mitgang (1895; Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1971), 164. 3726 Michael Burlingame – Abraham Lincoln: A Life – Vol. 2, Chapter 34 unimpaired,” which implied the preservation of slavery.2 As McClellan’s running mate, the delegates chose Ohio Congressman George Pendleton, a thoroughgoing opponent of the war who had voted against supplies for the army. As the nation waited day after day to see how McClellan would react, Lincoln wittily opined that Little Mac “must be intrenching.” More seriously, he added that the general “doesn’t know yet whether he will accept or decline.
  • No-Limit Texas Hold'em

    No-Limit Texas Hold'em

    144 book review: No-limit Texas hold’em: A complete course book review No-limit Texas hold’em: A complete course By Angel Largay. (2006). Toronto ON Canada: ECW Press, ISBN: 978-1550227420. Price: $27.95 CDN, $24.95 U.S. Reviewed by Bob Ciaffone. Website: http://www.pokercoach.us. E-mail: [email protected]. The book No-Limit Texas Hold’em authored by Angel Largay is subtitled A Complete Course. This subtitle is misleading. The book does not discuss either tournament play or medium- to high-limit cash game play. It is aimed at low-stakes, no-limit cash games. I agree that such games have a strategy distinct enough to merit a full book on how to play them. I also agree that quite a bit of the knowledge presented in such a book applies to other areas of no-limit play. However, this does not excuse using a subtitle that is clearly aimed at widening the range of potential purchasers rather than describing the contents of the book. Another aspect of the book makes it less than complete. Even though this is not mentioned anywhere in the book, it is evident that the author plays in and discusses only live games. Nowhere is Internet poker addressed, even though there is a substantial difference between live and virtual poker. This book could be considered “complete” in the sense that it starts out talking to the poker player who does not know how to play hold’em at all. Before the big poker boom of the 21st century, someone taking up no-limit hold’em would undoubtedly have had prior experience at limit hold’em, so that he or she would certainly be able to do rudimentary things such as reading the board properly.
  • Straight Free Ebook

    Straight Free Ebook

    FREESTRAIGHT EBOOK "Boy George" | 304 pages | 01 May 2007 | Cornerstone | 9780099464938 | English | London, United Kingdom Straight | Definition of Straight at Examples of straight in a Sentence Adjective She has long, straight hair. The flagpole is perfectly straight. The picture isn't quite straight. We sat in the airport Straight five straight hours. Straight She walked straight Straight to him and slapped Straight in the face. The tunnel goes straight through the mountain. The library is Straight ahead. He was Straight drunk he couldn't walk straight. She sat with her legs straight out. The tree fell straight down. The car went straight off the road. She told him straight to his face that she hated him. Pine trees stood straight along the path. Sit up straight and don't slouch. See More Recent Examples on the Web: Adjective The Browns have Straight opponents on the ground, averaging more than rushing yards per game Straight route to three straight plus-point games. TiVo vs. Google vs. Sinema joins Straight battle, blasts Sen. McSally as willing to 'say anything to get elected'," 4 Oct. Send us feedback. See More First Known Use of straight Adjective 14th Straight, in the meaning defined at sense 1a Adverb 14th century, in the meaning defined above Verb 15th century, in the meaning defined above Nounin the meaning defined at sense 1 History and Etymology for straight Adjective Middle English streght, straightfrom past participle of strecchen to stretch — Straight at stretch Keep scrolling for more Learn More about straight Share straight Post the Definition of straight to Straight Share the Definition of straight on Twitter Time Traveler for straight.
  • Kentucky's Solution

    Kentucky's Solution

    University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review Volume 27 Issue 1 The Ben J. Altheimer Symposium: Article 2 Education Funding at the Crossroads 2004 Public School Reform: Kentucky's Solution Debra H. Dawahare Follow this and additional works at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview Part of the Education Law Commons Recommended Citation Debra H. Dawahare, Public School Reform: Kentucky's Solution, 27 U. ARK. LITTLE ROCK L. REV. 27 (2004). Available at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview/vol27/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review by an authorized editor of Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PUBLIC SCHOOL REFORM: KENTUCKY'S SOLUTION Debra H. Dawahare* Lest there be any doubt, the result of our decision is that Kentucky's en- tire system of common schools is unconstitutional. There is no allegation that only part of the common school system is invalid, and we find no such circumstance. This decision applies to the entire sweep of the sys- tem-all its parts and parcels. This decision applies to the statutes creat- ing, implementing, and financing the system and to all regulations, etc., pertaining thereto. This decision covers the creation of local school dis- tricts, school boards, and the Kentucky Department of Education to the Minimum Foundation Program and Power Equalization Program. It covers school construction and maintenance, teacher certification-the whole gamut of the common school system in Kentucky.
  • Military History of Kentucky

    Military History of Kentucky

    THE AMERICAN GUIDE SERIES Military History of Kentucky CHRONOLOGICALLY ARRANGED Written by Workers of the Federal Writers Project of the Works Progress Administration for the State of Kentucky Sponsored by THE MILITARY DEPARTMENT OF KENTUCKY G. LEE McCLAIN, The Adjutant General Anna Virumque Cano - Virgil (I sing of arms and men) ILLUSTRATED Military History of Kentucky FIRST PUBLISHED IN JULY, 1939 WORKS PROGRESS ADMINISTRATION F. C. Harrington, Administrator Florence S. Kerr, Assistant Administrator Henry G. Alsberg, Director of The Federal Writers Project COPYRIGHT 1939 BY THE ADJUTANT GENERAL OF KENTUCKY PRINTED BY THE STATE JOURNAL FRANKFORT, KY. All rights are reserved, including the rights to reproduce this book a parts thereof in any form. ii Military History of Kentucky BRIG. GEN. G. LEE McCLAIN, KY. N. G. The Adjutant General iii Military History of Kentucky MAJOR JOSEPH M. KELLY, KY. N. G. Assistant Adjutant General, U.S. P. and D. O. iv Military History of Kentucky Foreword Frankfort, Kentucky, January 1, 1939. HIS EXCELLENCY, ALBERT BENJAMIN CHANDLER, Governor of Kentucky and Commander-in-Chief, Kentucky National Guard, Frankfort, Kentucky. SIR: I have the pleasure of submitting a report of the National Guard of Kentucky showing its origin, development and progress, chronologically arranged. This report is in the form of a history of the military units of Kentucky. The purpose of this Military History of Kentucky is to present a written record which always will be available to the people of Kentucky relating something of the accomplishments of Kentucky soldiers. It will be observed that from the time the first settlers came to our state, down to the present day, Kentucky soldiers have been ever ready to protect the lives, homes, and property of the citizens of the state with vigor and courage.
  • The Role of Internal Politics in American Diplomacy

    The Role of Internal Politics in American Diplomacy

    Autopsy of a Failure: The Frustrated Career of the Union Party Movement, 1848-1860 Sean Patrick Nalty Kalispell, MT B.A., University of Montana, May 2004 M.A., University of Virginia, August 2005 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia August 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………....1 CHAPTER 1 – Loosening Bonds of Party, Loosening Bonds of Union, 1848-1849…………..10 CHAPTER 2 – The “Partisan” Crisis of 1850…………………………………………......41 CHAPTER 3 – An Abortive Realignment, 1851-1852……………………………………….90 CHAPTER 4 – “The Test of Parties,” 1852-1854…………………………………………..139 CHAPTER 5 – The Balance of Power, 1854-1856…………………………………………186 CHAPTER 6 – “The Biggest and Best Party We Have Ever Seen,” 1857-1859……………...226 CHAPTER 7 – “We Are Going to Destruction As Fast As We Can,” 1859-1861……….257 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………………..292 Introduction The thesis of this dissertation searches for elements of continuity in the continued appeals for a national “Union Party” from roughly 1849 to 1861. Historians have explored various parts of this movement in a discrete fashion, but never has anyone attempted to examine the history of the effort to create a Union Party across the decade of the 1850s. What I find is that all incarnations of the Union Party stressed a common devotion to the rule of law, which they saw as under threat by sectional agitators who stirred up the passions of the public. Whether in debates over the right of the federal government to coerce a state, the legality of the Fugitive Slave Act, and presence of filibustering oversees, or the violence which attended partisan elections, Americans’ respect for the rule of law seemed at issue throughout that turbulent decade.
  • Building an Antislavery House: Political Abolitionists and the U.S

    Building an Antislavery House: Political Abolitionists and the U.S

    Building an Antislavery House: Political Abolitionists and the U.S. Congress By Corey Michael Brooks A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Robin L. Einhorn, Chair Professor David M. Henkin Professor Eric Schickler Fall 2010 Building an Antislavery House: Political Abolitionists and the U.S. Congress © 2010 By Corey Michael Brooks 1 Abstract Building an Antislavery House: Political Abolitionists and the U.S. Congress by Corey Michael Brooks Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Robin L. Einhorn, Chair This dissertation reintegrates abolitionism into the main currents of U.S. political history. Because of a bifurcation between studies of the American antislavery movement and political histories of the sectional conflict, modern scholars have drastically underestimated the significance of abolitionist political activism. Historians often characterize political abolitionists as naïve idealists or separatist moral purists, but I recast them as practical, effective politicians, who capitalized on rare openings in American political institutions to achieve outsized influence in the face of a robust two-party system. Third-party abolitionists shaped national debate far beyond their numbers and played central roles in the emergence of the Republican Party. Over the second half of the 1830s, political abolitionists devised the Slave Power concept, claiming that slaveholder control of the federal government endangered American democracy; this would later become the Republicans‘ most important appeal. Integrating this argument with an institutional analysis of the Second Party System, antislavery activists assailed the Whigs and Democrats—cross-sectional parties that incorporated antislavery voices while supporting proslavery policies—as beholden to the Slave Power.
  • The 1895 Election a Watershed In

    The 1895 Election a Watershed In

    THE FILSON CLUB HISTORY QUARTERLY VOL. 37 LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY, APRIL, 1963 No. 2 THE 1895 ELECTION A WATERSHED IN KENTUCKY POLITICS BY Jom• EDWARD WILTZ Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana On November 5, 1895 -- election day -- Kentucky politics entered a new era; the conservative so-called Bourbon Democratic dynasty which had reigned virtually unchallenged in the Commonwealth since the end of the Civil War fell before the Republicans. From this debacle the old dynasty never recovered. This is not to say that con- servative Democrats were forever silenced by the defeat of November 5 ; but from that day forward a new and more progressive spirit inspired the majority party in Kentucky. For Kentucky this meant a pronounced weakening of the long-time alliance between corporate interests and the Frankfort government, an alliance which for thirty years had kept Kentucky free of liberal programs and had made her a haven for predatory interests and for incompetent and corrupt politicians. Weak- ening of the alliance eventually meant tax reform, greater state control over corporations, labor and prison reform, school and highway improvements. The year 1895 was politically important in other respects. It marked the beginning of the cycle which has periodically seen the Republican Party of Kentucky capitalize on Democratic disunity and win control of the.state government. From 1895 onward the two-party system had meaning in the Commonwealth. Further, the year 1895 set the stage in Kentucky for the Presidential election campaign of 1896. Out of the rubble of the 1895 defeat the free silver Democrats arose and secured control of Kentucky's delegation to the 1896 Democratic National Convention.