Starfish: Biology and Ecology of the Asteroidea

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Starfish: Biology and Ecology of the Asteroidea STARFISH This page intentionally left blank STARFISH Biology and Ecology of the Asteroidea Edited by John M. Lawrence THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY PRESS | baltimore © 2013 The Johns Hopkins University Press All rights reserved. Published 2013 Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 The Johns Hopkins University Press 2715 North Charles Street Baltimore, Mary land 21218- 4363 w w w . p r e s s . j h u . e d u Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Starfi sh : biology and ecol ogy of the Asteroidea / edited by John M. Lawrence. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978- 1- 4214- 0787- 6 (hdbk. : alk. paper) – ISBN 1- 4214- 0787- 6 (hdbk. : alk. paper) 1. Starfi shes. I. Lawrence, John M. QL384.A8S73 2013 593.9'3–dc23 2012020461 A cata log record for this book is available from the British Library. Special discounts are available for bulk purchases of this book. For more information, please contact Special Sales at 410- 516- 6936 or [email protected]. The Johns Hopkins University Press uses environmentally friendly book materials, including recycled text paper that is composed of at least 30 percent post- consumer waste, whenever possible. Contents Contributors vii Part II • Integrative Biology Preface ix 10 Astropecten 101 Carlos Renato R. Ventura Part I • Comparative Biology 11 Luidia 109 and Ecol ogy John M. Lawrence 1 Phylogeny of the Asteroidea 3 12 Odontaster validus 120 Andrew S. Gale John S. Pearse 2 The Asteroid Arm 15 13 Acanthaster planci 132 John M. Lawrence Katharina Fabricius 3 Functional Biology of Asteroid Tube Feet 24 14 Oreaster reticulatus 142 Elise Hennebert, Michel Jangoux, Robert E. Scheibling and Patrick Flammang 15 Heliaster helianthus 153 4 Reproduction in Asteroidea 37 Juan Carlos Castilla, Sergio A. Annie Mercier and Navarrete, Tatiana Manzur, and Jean- François Hamel Mario Barahona 5 Asteroid Evolutionary Developmental Biology 16 Pisaster ochraceus 161 Carlos Robles and Ecol ogy 51 Maria Byrne 17 Asterias amurensis 174 Maria Byrne, Timothy D. O’Hara, 6 Larval Ecol ogy, Settlement, and Recruitment and John M. Lawrence of Asteroids 59 Anna Metaxas 18 Leptasterias polaris 181 Carlos F. Gaymer and 7 Ecological Role of Sea Stars from Populations John H. Himmelman to Meta- ecosystems 67 19 Coscinasterias 191 Bruce A. Menge and Eric Sanford Michael F. Barker 8 Chemistry and Ecological Role of Starfi sh 20 Echinaster 200 Secondary Metabolites 81 Richard L. Turner James B. McClintock, Charles D. Amsler, and Bill J. Baker 9 Ste roids in Asteroidea 91 References 215 Stephen A. Watts and Index 261 Kristina M. Wasson This page intentionally left blank Contributors Charles D. Amsler Juan Carlos Castilla Jean- François Hamel Department of Biology Departamento de Ecología and Society for the Exploration and University of Alabama at Centro Mileno de Conserva- Valuing of the Environment Birmingham ción Marina, Estación Costera Portugal Cove, St. Philips, Birmingham, Alabama, USA de Investigaciones Marinas, Newfoundland and Labrador, Las Cruces, Chile Canada Bill J. Baker Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas. Department of Chemistry and Universidad Católica de Chile Elise Hennebert Center for Drug Discovery Santiago, Chile Université de Mons and Innovation Laboratoire de Biologie Marine University of South Florida Katharina Fabricius Académie Universitaire Tampa, Florida, USA Australian Institute of Marine Wallonie- Bruxelles Science Mons, Belgium Mario Barahona Townsville, Queensland, Departamento de Ecología and Australia John H. Himmelman Centro Mileno de Conserva- Départment de Biologie, ción Marina, Estación Costera Patrick Flammang Université Laval de Investigaciones Marinas, Université de Mons Quebec City, Quebec, Las Cruces, Chile Laboratoire de Biologie Marine Canada Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas Académie Universitaire Universidad Católica de Chile Wallonie- Bruxelles Michel Jangoux Santiago, Chile Mons, Belgium Laboratoire de Biologie Marine Université de Mons Michael F. Barker Andrew S. Gale Académie Universitaire Department of Marine Science School of Earth and Wallonie- Bruxelles and Portobello Marine Environmental Sciences Mons, Belgium Laboratory University of Portsmouth Laboratoire de Biologie Marine University of Otago, Dunedin, Portsmouth, United Kingdom Université Libre de Bruxelles New Zealand Académie Universitaire Carlos F. Gaymer Wallonie- Bruxelles Maria Byrne Departamento de Biologia Brussels, Belgium Schools of Medical and Marina, Centro de Estudios Biological Sciences Avanzados en John M. Lawrence University of Sydney, Sydney, Zonas Áridas Department of Integrative Biology New South Wales, Universidad Católica del Norte University of South Florida Australia Coquimbo, Chile Tampa, Florida, USA viii contributors Tatiana Manzur Sergio A. Navarette Robert E. Scheibling Departamento de Ecología and Departamento de Ecología and Department of Biology Centro Mileno de Conserva- Centro Mileno de Conserva- Dalhousie University ción Marina, Estación Cos- ción Marina, Estación Costera Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada tera de Investigaciones de Investigaciones Marinas Marinas Las Cruces, Chile Richard L. Turner Las Cruces, Chile Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas Department of Biological Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas Universidad Católica de Chile Sciences Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago, Chile Florida Institute of Technology Santiago, Chile Melbourne, Florida, USA Timothy D. O’Hara James B. McClintock Museum Victoria Carlos Renato R. Ventura Department of Biology Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Museu Nacional University of Alabama at Departamento de Invertebrados Birmingham John S. Pearse Universidade Federal do Rio de Birmingham, Alabama, USA Long Marine Laboratory Janeiro University of California, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Bruce A. Menge Santa Cruz Cristóvão Department of Zoology Santa Cruz, California, USA Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon, USA Carlos Robles Kristina M. Wasson Department of Biology Department of Biology Annie Mercier California State University University of Alabama at Ocean Sciences Centre at Los Angeles Birmingham Memorial University Los Angeles, California, USA Birmingham, Alabama, USA St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada Eric Sanford Stephen A. Watts Department of Evolution and Department of Biology Anna Metaxas Ecol ogy University of Alabama at Department of Oceanography University of California Birmingham Dalhousie University Davis, California, USA Birmingham, Alabama, USA Halifax, Nova Scotia, Bodega Marine Laboratory Canada Bodega Bay, California, USA Preface tarfi sh are icons of the sea. But they also have im mense biological Sand ecological importance. They are one of the major classes of Echinodermata, with a distinctive and varied body form. Starfi sh live in a variety of marine habitats where they are major predators that greatly aff ect their communities. With a long fossil record, starfi sh are of tremendous interest to paleontologists and evolutionary biologists. Although study of starfi sh biology began in the second half of the nineteenth century, many basic aspects of their physiology, nutrition, reproduction, and even anatomy still are not well known. Study of starfi sh ecol ogy began in the fi rst half of the twentieth century but has been limited primarily to species whose eff ect can be conspicuous, in- cluding the crown- of- thorns starfi sh on coral reefs and species that af- fect shellfi sh fi sheries. Effects of other species are not as well understood because they are not as accessible or conspicuous and they do not have an economic impact. This book provides a comprehensive understanding of the biology and ecol ogy of starfi sh. It is divided into two sections: comparative chapters that consider aspects of biology and ecol ogy across the class and integrative chapters that consider aspects of biology and ecol ogy of individual species or genera. These approaches are complementary. Species and genera were selected for the integrative chapters based on the scope of knowledge about them and the availability of experts to be authors. I am grateful to my friends and colleagues, experts in their fi elds, who have contributed to this book. It is a plea sure to thank executive editor Vincent Burke, Jennifer Malat, and Michele Callaghan at the Johns Hopkins University Press for their kind assistance in its production. This page intentionally left blank STARFISH This page intentionally left blank PART I • COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY AND ECOL OGY This page intentionally left blank 1 Phylogeny of the Asteroidea Andrew S. Gale he phylogeny of asteroids has been a controversial topic for more than 100 years. The detailed morphology of spines and Tpedicellariae formed the basis of an ordinal classifi cation by Per- rier (1884, 1894), consisting of the Paxillosida, Spinulosida, Valvatida, and Forcipulatida, which have obtained widespread use among neon- tologists. Apart from some rearrangement of taxa included variously in the Spinulosida and Valvatida (Blake 1981) and the resurrection of Perrier’s Velatida (Blake 1987; Fig. 1.1a), the classifi cation has been re- markably stable. In contrast, the interrelationships of the orders have remained obscure and controversial. Fossil asteroids have been known since the early nineteenth century. It was clear from early studies (e.g., Forbes 1848) that many Jurassic and later asteroids were surprisingly similar to extant taxa at the level of families or even genera. Concomitantly, it became increasingly clear that Paleozoic
Recommended publications
  • Universidad Austral De Chile Facultad De Ciencias Escuela De Biología Marina
    Universidad Austral de Chile Facultad de Ciencias Escuela de Biología Marina Profesor Patrocinante: Dr. Dirk Schories. Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas. Facultad de Ciencias – Universidad Austral de Chile. Profesor Co-patrocinante: Dr. Luis M. Pardo. Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas. Facultad de Ciencias – Universidad Austral de Chile. ECOLOGÍA TRÓFICA DEL ASTEROIDEO Cosmasterias lurida (Phillipi, 1858) EN EL SENO DEL RELONCAVÍ (SUR DE CHILE): DISTRIBUCIÓN, ABUNDANCIA, ALIMENTACIÓN Y MOVIMIENTO. Tesis de Grado presentada como parte de los requisitos para optar al grado de Licenciado en Biología Marina y Título Profesional de Biólogo Marino. IGNACIO ANDRÉS GARRIDO IRIONDO VALDIVIA - CHILE 2012. AGRADECIMIENTOS Primero que todo, me siento extremadamente afortunado gracias a tanta gente maravillosa que en estos 25 años se ha cruzado por mi camino. Quiero agradecer especialmente a todos los que aportaron de alguna forma en mi formación como Biólogo Marino: A mi núcleo familiar, Margarita I., Dagoberto G. y Augusto G. (también Gorlak y Ulises) que con sus consejos y apoyo incondicional logre cumplir este sueño que tanto anhelaba. Gracias por todo el cariño y por creer en mí, esto se los dedico a ustedes. Al Dr. Dirk Schories, amigo y profesor, quien me enseño a disfrutar y valorar lo que más admiro en la vida, la naturaleza y el infinito mundo submarino. Asimismo, quien me guió en mi formación como Biólogo Marino y con quien compartí incontables inmersiones fascinantes e inolvidables. Además fue quien financio esta tesis de pregrado. Espero podamos continuar trabajando en el futuro. ¡Muchas gracias por todo! Al Dr. Luis M. Pardo, quien con el tiempo se convirtió en un importante guía profesional y amigo.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Phylogeography of Southern Ocean Sea Stars (Asteroidea)
    Diversity and phylogeography of Southern Ocean sea stars (Asteroidea) Thesis submitted by Camille MOREAU in fulfilment of the requirements of the PhD Degree in science (ULB - “Docteur en Science”) and in life science (UBFC – “Docteur en Science de la vie”) Academic year 2018-2019 Supervisors: Professor Bruno Danis (Université Libre de Bruxelles) Laboratoire de Biologie Marine And Dr. Thomas Saucède (Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté) Biogéosciences 1 Diversity and phylogeography of Southern Ocean sea stars (Asteroidea) Camille MOREAU Thesis committee: Mr. Mardulyn Patrick Professeur, ULB Président Mr. Van De Putte Anton Professeur Associé, IRSNB Rapporteur Mr. Poulin Elie Professeur, Université du Chili Rapporteur Mr. Rigaud Thierry Directeur de Recherche, UBFC Examinateur Mr. Saucède Thomas Maître de Conférences, UBFC Directeur de thèse Mr. Danis Bruno Professeur, ULB Co-directeur de thèse 2 Avant-propos Ce doctorat s’inscrit dans le cadre d’une cotutelle entre les universités de Dijon et Bruxelles et m’aura ainsi permis d’élargir mon réseau au sein de la communauté scientifique tout en étendant mes horizons scientifiques. C’est tout d’abord grâce au programme vERSO (Ecosystem Responses to global change : a multiscale approach in the Southern Ocean) que ce travail a été possible, mais aussi grâce aux collaborations construites avant et pendant ce travail. Cette thèse a aussi été l’occasion de continuer à aller travailler sur le terrain des hautes latitudes à plusieurs reprises pour collecter les échantillons et rencontrer de nouveaux collègues. Par le biais de ces trois missions de recherches et des nombreuses conférences auxquelles j’ai activement participé à travers le monde, j’ai beaucoup appris, tant scientifiquement qu’humainement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sea Stars (Echinodermata: Asteroidea): Their Biology, Ecology, Evolution and Utilization OPEN ACCESS
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328063815 The Sea Stars (Echinodermata: Asteroidea): Their Biology, Ecology, Evolution and Utilization OPEN ACCESS Article · January 2018 CITATIONS READS 0 6 5 authors, including: Ferdinard Olisa Megwalu World Fisheries University @Pukyong National University (wfu.pknu.ackr) 3 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Population Dynamics. View project All content following this page was uploaded by Ferdinard Olisa Megwalu on 04 October 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Review Article Published: 17 Sep, 2018 SF Journal of Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering The Sea Stars (Echinodermata: Asteroidea): Their Biology, Ecology, Evolution and Utilization Rahman MA1*, Molla MHR1, Megwalu FO1, Asare OE1, Tchoundi A1, Shaikh MM1 and Jahan B2 1World Fisheries University Pilot Programme, Pukyong National University (PKNU), Nam-gu, Busan, Korea 2Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna, Bangladesh Abstract The Sea stars (Asteroidea: Echinodermata) are comprising of a large and diverse groups of sessile marine invertebrates having seven extant orders such as Brisingida, Forcipulatida, Notomyotida, Paxillosida, Spinulosida, Valvatida and Velatida and two extinct one such as Calliasterellidae and Trichasteropsida. Around 1,500 living species of starfish occur on the seabed in all the world's oceans, from the tropics to subzero polar waters. They are found from the intertidal zone down to abyssal depths, 6,000m below the surface. Starfish typically have a central disc and five arms, though some species have a larger number of arms. The aboral or upper surface may be smooth, granular or spiny, and is covered with overlapping plates.
    [Show full text]
  • E Urban Sanctuary Algae and Marine Invertebrates of Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary
    !e Urban Sanctuary Algae and Marine Invertebrates of Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary Jessica Reeves & John Buckeridge Published by: Greypath Productions Marine Care Ricketts Point PO Box 7356, Beaumaris 3193 Copyright © 2012 Marine Care Ricketts Point !is work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission of the publisher. Photographs remain copyright of the individual photographers listed. ISBN 978-0-9804483-5-1 Designed and typeset by Anthony Bright Edited by Alison Vaughan Printed by Hawker Brownlow Education Cheltenham, Victoria Cover photo: Rocky reef habitat at Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary, David Reinhard Contents Introduction v Visiting the Sanctuary vii How to use this book viii Warning viii Habitat ix Depth x Distribution x Abundance xi Reference xi A note on nomenclature xii Acknowledgements xii Species descriptions 1 Algal key 116 Marine invertebrate key 116 Glossary 118 Further reading 120 Index 122 iii Figure 1: Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary. !e intertidal zone rocky shore platform dominated by the brown alga Hormosira banksii. Photograph: John Buckeridge. iv Introduction Most Australians live near the sea – it is part of our national psyche. We exercise in it, explore it, relax by it, "sh in it – some even paint it – but most of us simply enjoy its changing modes and its fascinating beauty. Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary comprises 115 hectares of protected marine environment, located o# Beaumaris in Melbourne’s southeast ("gs 1–2). !e sanctuary includes the coastal waters from Table Rock Point to Quiet Corner, from the high tide mark to approximately 400 metres o#shore.
    [Show full text]
  • Starfish Adaptations: Peer-Taught
    Starfish Adaptations: Peer-Taught Subject (Focus/Topic): Life Science: Animal adaptations, structure and function, habitat, natural selection. Grade Level: Second Grade; taught by high school biology students. Average Learning Time: This lesson will take approximately two 45-minute periods. Lesson Summary (Overview/Purpose): Students will observe, explore, dissect and compare members of the animal phylum Image credit: Divegallery.com Echinodermata to understand what particular traits make them successful in their environment. Second grade students work with peer (high school student) teachers. Overall Concept (Big Idea/Essential Question): Students explore an unknown organism to understand that every living creature has traits that impact their use of habitat. The structure and function of traits are important in an individual’s survival and the survival of populations. Specific Concepts (Key Concepts): Students will understand three key features of starfish systems: water vascular, digestive and integument (skin). They will compare these systems to human and describe ways that the starfish systems are beneficial to them in their environment. Students will relate the success of starfish to their adaptations. Focus Questions (Specific Questions): Where do starfish live? What is their habitat? If you lived in the ocean, what would you need to survive? What do you notice about the starfish’s skin? How might the starfish skin help it in its habitat? What do starfish use to move? How do they do this? Do starfish need oxygen like humans do? How do they get their oxygen? How do starfish get food? What do they use to get food? How do starfish see? Where do you think their eyes are located? Objectives/Learning Goals: Students will be able to describe three structures of starfish anatomy and relate the structure to function with 80% accuracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Creatures of Clayoquot and Barkley Sounds: a Life History Manual
    Some Creatures of Clayoquot and Barkley Sounds: A Life History Manual By Stefan Linquist & Jim Shinkewski Photos Danny Kent Sponsored by the Ucluelet Aquarium Society the Clayoquot Biosphere Trust, and the Biohumanities Project 1 Table of contents Introduction…………………………………………………………... 3 Acorn Barnacle ………………………………………………………. 4 Spiny Pink Sea Star ………………………………………………….. 8 Decorator Crab ………………………………………………………. 9 Orange Sea Pen ……………………………………………………… 11 California Sea Cucumber ……………………………………………. 13 Dungeness Crab …………………………………………………….. 15 Boring Sulfur Sponge ………………………………………………. 19 Moon Snail …………………………………………………………. 22 Opalescent Nudibranch …………………………………………….. 24 Moon Jellyfish ……………………………………………………... 27 Bay Pipefish ……………………………………………………….. 31 Green Surf Anemone ………………………………………………. 34 Spot Prawn …………………………………………………………. 35 Sea Urchin …………………………………………………………. 37 Shiner Perch ……………………………………………………….. 39 Sunflower Sea Star ………………………………………………… 41 Squat Lobster ………………………………………………………. 43 Plumose Anemone …………………………………………………. 45 Ochre Sea Star ……………………………………………………… 47 Wolf Eel ……………………………………………………………. 49 Sand Dollar ………………………………………………………… 51 2 Introduction All of us bring different eyes to the ocean and its inhabitants. Some enjoy food from the sea. Some admire the self-renewing nature of coastal waters. Others marvel in the diversity of colours, shapes and interrelationships among marine creatures. Because we enjoy it, as aquarists, philosophers, fishermen, shore walkers or the merely curious, we ought to care about its well being. To this end, this
    [Show full text]
  • Crab Predators Are More Important at Higher Latitudes
    Marine Biology (2019) 166:142 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-019-3587-0 ORIGINAL PAPER Variation in consumer pressure along 2500 km in a major upwelling system: crab predators are more important at higher latitudes Catalina A. Musrri1 · Alistair G. B. Poore2 · Iván A. Hinojosa3,4 · Erasmo C. Macaya4,5,6 · Aldo S. Pacheco7 · Alejandro Pérez‑Matus8 · Oscar Pino‑Olivares1 · Nicolás Riquelme‑Pérez1 · Wolfgang B. Stotz1 · Nelson Valdivia6,9 · Vieia Villalobos1,10 · Martin Thiel1,4,11 Received: 21 January 2019 / Accepted: 10 September 2019 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Consumer pressure in benthic communities is predicted to be higher at low than at high latitudes, but support for this pat- tern has been ambiguous, especially for herbivory. To understand large-scale variation in biotic interactions, we quantify consumption (predation and herbivory) along 2500 km of the Chilean coast (19°S–42°S). We deployed tethering assays at ten sites with three diferent baits: the crab Petrolisthes laevigatus as living prey for predators, dried squid as dead prey for predators/scavengers, and the kelp Lessonia spp. for herbivores. Underwater videos were used to characterize the consumer community and identify those species consuming baits. The species composition of consumers, frequency of occurrence, and maximum abundance (MaxN) of crustaceans and the blenniid fsh Scartichthys spp. varied across sites. Consumption of P. laevigatus and kelp did not vary with latitude, while squid baits were consumed more quickly at mid and high latitudes. This is likely explained by the increased occurrence of predatory crabs, which was positively correlated with consumption of squidpops after 2 h.
    [Show full text]
  • Wasting Disease and Static Environmental Variables Drive Sea
    Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 520 (2019) 151209 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jembe Wasting disease and static environmental variables drive sea star T assemblages in the Northern Gulf of Alaska ⁎ Brenda Konara, , Timothy James Mitchella, Katrin Ikena, Heather Colettib, Thomas Deanc, Daniel Eslerd, Mandy Lindeberge, Benjamin Pisterf, Benjamin Weitzmana,d a University of Alaska Fairbanks, PO Box 757220, Fairbanks, AK 99709, USA b US National Park Service, Inventory and Monitoring Program, Southwest Alaska Network, 4175 Geist Road, Fairbanks, AK 99709, USA c Coastal Resource Associates, 5190 El Arbol Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA d US Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, AK 99508, USA e NOAA Fisheries, AFSC, Auke Bay Laboratories, 17109 Pt Lena Loop Rd, Juneau, AK 99801, USA f US National Park Service, Kenai Fjords National Park, 411 Washington Street, Seward, AK 99664, USA ABSTRACT Sea stars are ecologically important in rocky intertidal habitats where they can play an apex predator role, completely restructuring communities. The recent sea star die-off throughout the eastern Pacific, known as Sea Star Wasting Disease, has prompted a need to understand spatial and temporal patterns of seastarassemblages and the environmental variables that structure these assemblages. We examined spatial and temporal patterns in sea star assemblages (composition and density) across regions in the northern Gulf of Alaska and assessed the role of seven static environmental variables (distance to freshwater inputs, tidewater glacial presence, exposure to wave action, fetch, beach slope, substrate composition, and tidal range) in influencing sea star assemblage structure before and after sea star declines.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Evidence for Mixed Modes of Reproduction in the Coral Pocillopora Damicornis and Its Effect on Population Structure
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 306: 115–124, 2006 Published January 11 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Genetic evidence for mixed modes of reproduction in the coral Pocillopora damicornis and its effect on population structure Kelley Whitaker* Department of Zoology, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6907, Australia Present address: Department of Genetics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa ABSTRACT: Allozyme electrophoresis of 6 polymorphic loci was used to estimate the relative impor- tance of sexual and asexual reproduction in Western Australian populations of the coral Pocillopora damicornis and to infer the extent of larval dispersal between them. Evidence for considerable yet variable amounts of asexual reproduction was found. Only 96 of a total of 644 coral heads sampled were apparently of sexual origin, and 8 of the 10 populations showed large departures from Hardy- Weinberg equilibria as a result of both heterozygote excesses and deficits. Multi-locus genotypic diversity values were significantly less than expected for 8 of the 10 populations sampled, but the magnitude of these values varied enormously (range Go:Ge = 0.072 to 0.770). Significant genetic sub- division among populations was found (FST = 0.360) that was not attributable to different reefs (FRT = 0.080), habitat type (FHT = –0.039), or geographical distance between populations (Mantel test p = 0.129). However, pairwise comparisons revealed significant genetic subdivision at all spatial scales sampled. Furthermore, this subdivision was largely maintained even among populations of putative sexual origin (FST = 0.175). These results are consistent with the notion that reefs at Ningaloo and the Houtman Abrolhos Islands are primarily self-seeding and that asexually derived recruits have a con- siderable effect on local abundance and population structure.
    [Show full text]
  • I. the Development of the Starfish Solaster Endeca Forbes
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON. I. The Development of the Star$.& Solaster endeca _Forbes. By JAMESF. GEMMILL, M.A., M.D., B.Sc., F.Z.S., Leetwer ~PL~~~~~~l~g~, Glnsgow Uwiversity, ad in Zoology, Glnsgow Provincial Fraining College. (Received and read November 29, 1910.) [PLATESI.-V.] CONTENTS. Page I. STRUCTURDAND POSITION ........................................................ 3 11. OVARIESAND OVA .............................................................. 4 Arrangement and structure of the egg-tubes, 4; muscular t.issue and sinus-spaces in their walls, 4; relation of the latter to genital sinuses and hiemal tissue, 5; growth of the ova, 6 ; accumulation of yolk-granules, 6 ; yolk-nuclei, 7 ; follicle-cells, 7 ; egg-ducts, 8. 111. MATURATION,SPA.WNIXGI, PERTILIZATIOB, Brc. ........................................ 9 Time of maturation, 9 ; season, &c. of spawning, 9 ; the ova in water, 10 j memhrarie of fertilisation, 11 j cross-fertilisation, 11 ; early and later segmentetion, 11 ; formation of blastula by egression and of gastrula by invagination, 12 ; appearance of cilia, 12 ; morements of blastula and gastrula, 13 ; hypenchyme, 13 ; chronology, 13. IV. ESTEBNALCHARACTERS, MOVEMENTS, &c. DURIND THE FREE-SWIMMINGP~RIOD .............. 14 Elongation of gastrula, 14 ; formation of arms and of sucker, 14 ; preoral lobe and body of larva, 14 ; formation of hydropore, 14 j closure of blastopore; 15 j movements of the lam=, 15 j ciliation at anterior and posterior ends an? over general surface, 15 ; commencement of flexion and torsion of the preoral lobe, 16 ; first appearance extern- ally of hydroccele lobes and of aboral arm rudiments, 17 j chronology, 17. VOL. XX.-PART I. No. I.--Februny, 1912. B 2 DR. J.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Habits of <I>Oreaster Reticulatus</I>
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 32(2): 504-510, 1982 FEEDING HABITS OF OREASTER RETICULATUS (ECHINODERMATA: ASTEROIDEA) R. E. Scheibling ABSTRACT In situ feeding observations among eight populations in various grassbed and sand-bottom habitats in the Grenadines and off St. Croix. U.S. Virgin Islands indicate that Oreaster reticulatus is primarily an omnivorous. microphagous substratum grazer. It extrudes its extensive cardiac stomach upon seagrass. sand, and/or algal substrates and ingests associated micro-organisms and particulate detritus. O. reticulatus also functions as an opportunistic predator and scavenger of any available slow-moving, sessile or moribund macrofauna and is occasionally cannibalistic. The feeding habits of O. reticulatus may be exemplary of tropical, shallow-water asteroids in general. Oreaster reticulatus (Linnaeus) is an abundant and conspicuous inhabitant of seagrass and sand bottoms in the Caribbean (Scheibling, 1980a,b). However, published information on its feeding biology is limited. A few incidental obser- vations and circumstantial evidence have led to divergent conclusions: O. reti- culatus typically digests microscopic organic material upon the substratum but occasionally feeds on sponges (Thomas, 1960); it preys upon the urchin Meoma ventricosa (Kier and Grant, 1965); and, based on anatomical specialization of the gut, it functions as a suspension feeder (Anderson, 1978). Anderson (1978) has expressed the need that "studies soon be made on the feeding biology of Oreaster reticulatus, to supplement incidental observations, and to determine the validity of conclusions that can now be only inferred from considerations of the anatomy of the digestive system." This study surveys the feeding habits of Oreaster reticulatus in situ in several populations from various habitats in the Carribbean.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Fauna of Lundy Ecidnodermata
    Rep. Lundy Fld Soc. 29 (1978) THE MARINE FAUNA OF LUNDY ECIDNODERMATA P. A. TYLER Department of Oceanography, University College, Swansea, S. Wales, U.K. INTRODUCTION The five classes of echinoderms are a conspicuous element of the fauna in truly marine areas. The British echinoderm fauna has been treated in detail by Mortensen (1927). In shelf sea areas they are usually found below LWN tide level with occasional species moving up into the littoral zone. Examples of the dominant extant groups are found in all types of substrates, the ophiuroids and the heart urchins being particularly important in the determination of soft substrate benthic communities (Thorson, 1947). SOURCES OF MATERIAL The collections made by divers during marine surveys of Lundy have pro­ duced a considerable record particularly of the conspicuous epifaunal asteroids, regular echinoids and holothurians. Observations of the less conspicuous in­ faunal ophiuroids and irregular echinoids have been obtained by divers and by benthic surveys using R.V. 'Ocean Crest'. THE LUNDY FAUNA- GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS To date, 24 species of echinoderm have been recorded around Lundy. Of these species only 8 were recorded by Harvey (1950, 1951) at Lundy. The most noteable exceptions to the fauna are Acrocnida brachiata and Spatangus purpureus, both of which have been found further up the Bristol Channel and may be supposed to be found round Lundy where a suitable substrate exists for these infaunal species. A number of species appear to be common all round the island. These include Asterias rubens, Marthasterias glacia/is, Luidia ciliaris, Echinus esculentus and Holothuria forskali. The very rare sea cucumber Lepto­ synapta decaria has been reported as occurring round Lundy (Hoare & Wilson, 1976).
    [Show full text]