DOCSLIB.ORG

Fauna Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Terrestrial Fauna Survey (Level 1) of Marillana Iron Ore Project Camp, Road and Airstrip Option B October 2011 Version 2 On behalf of: Brockman Resources Ltd c/- Botanica Consulting PO Box 2027 BOULDER WA 6432 T: 08 9093 0024 F: 08 9093 1381 E: [email protected] Prepared by: Greg Harewood B.Sc. A.B.N. 95 536 627 336 PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 T/F: (08) 9725 0982 E: [email protected] MARILLANA IRON ORE PROJECT - CAMP, ROAD AND AIRSTRIP (OPT B) – L 1 FAUNA SURVEY – OCT ‘11 – V2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................... 1 2. SCOPE OF WORKS ................................................................................ 1 3. BIOGEOGRAPHICAL SETTING .............................................................. 1 4. METHODOLOGY..................................................................................... 2 4.1 POTENTIAL FAUNA INVENTORY - DESKTOP STUDY.......................... 2 4.1.1 Database Searches........................................................................ 2 4.1.2 Previous Fauna Surveys in the Area............................................... 3 4.1.3 Existing Publications....................................................................... 4 4.1.4 Fauna of Conservation Significance ............................................... 5 4.1.5 Invertebrates................................................................................... 6 4.1.6 Taxonomy and Nomenclature......................................................... 6 4.2 SITE SURVEYS ....................................................................................... 6 4.2.1 Fauna Habitat Assessment............................................................. 6 4.2.2 Opportunistic Fauna Observations.................................................. 7 5. SURVEY CONSTRAINTS ........................................................................ 7 6. RESULTS................................................................................................. 8 6.1 POTENTIAL FAUNA INVENTORY - DESKTOP STUDY.......................... 8 6.2 SITE SURVEYS ....................................................................................... 8 6.2.1 Fauna Habitat Assessment............................................................. 8 6.2.2 Opportunistic Fauna Surveys.......................................................... 9 6.3 FAUNA INVENTORY – SUMMARY ......................................................... 9 6.3.1 Vertebrate Fauna............................................................................ 9 6.3.2 Invertebrate Fauna ....................................................................... 13 MARILLANA IRON ORE PROJECT - CAMP, ROAD AND AIRSTRIP (OPT B) – L 1 FAUNA SURVEY – OCT ‘11 – V2 7. ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS AND MANAGEMENT..................................... 13 7.1 POTENTIAL IMPACTS........................................................................... 13 7.2 MINIMISING IMPACTS .......................................................................... 15 8. LEGISLATIVE OBLIGATIONS ............................................................... 16 8.1 WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ACT 1950................................................. 16 8.2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT 1986........................................ 17 8.3 COMMONWEALTH ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION & BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACT 1999.................................................................. 18 9. CONCLUSION ....................................................................................... 21 10. BIBLIOGRAPHY..................................................................................... 23 FIGURES FIGURE 1: Study Area & Surrounds FIGURE 2: Study Area - Air Photo FIGURE 3: Fauna Habitats TABLES TABLE 1: Summary of Potential Vertebrate Fauna Species TABLE 2: Likelihood of Occurrence and Degree of Potential Impact – Fauna Species of Conservation Significance MARILLANA IRON ORE PROJECT - CAMP, ROAD AND AIRSTRIP (OPT B) – L 1 FAUNA SURVEY – OCT ‘11 – V2 PLATES PLATE 1: Open Low Woodland (Acacia pteraneura) over Grassland (Triodia basedowii) PLATE 2: Very Open Shrub Mallee (Euclayptus odontocarpa/Hakea lorea) over Grassland (Triodia basedowii) PLATE 3: Open Low Woodland (Acacia ptetraneura) over Sparse Scrub (Acacia bivenosa) PLATE 4: Open Low Shrub (Acacia victoriae) over Open Dwarf Scrub (Frankenia ambita) APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Conservation Categories APPENDIX B: Fauna Observed or Potentially in Region of Study Area APPENDIX C: DEC NatureMap & Protected Matters Database Search Results APPENDIX D: Significant Species Profiles MARILLANA IRON ORE PROJECT - CAMP, ROAD AND AIRSTRIP (OPT B) – L 1 FAUNA SURVEY – OCT ‘11 – V2 DISCLAIMER This fauna assessment report (“the report”) has been prepared in accordance with the scope of services set out in the contract, or as otherwise agreed, between the Client and Greg Harewood (“the Author”). In some circumstances the scope of services may have been limited by a range of factors such as time, budget, access and/or site disturbance constraints. In accordance with the scope of services, the Author has relied upon the data and has conducted environmental field monitoring and/or testing in the preparation of the report. The nature and extent of monitoring and/or testing conducted is described in the report. The conclusions are based upon field data and the environmental monitoring and/or testing carried out over a limited period of time and are therefore merely indicative of the environmental condition of the site at the time of preparing the report. Also it should be recognised that site conditions, can change with time. Within the limitations imposed by the scope of services, the field assessment and preparation of this report have been undertaken and performed in a professional manner, in accordance with generally accepted practices and using a degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised by reputable environmental consultants under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. In preparing the report, the Author has relied upon data, surveys, analyses, designs, plans and other information provided by the Client and other individuals and organisations, most of which are referred to in the report (“the data”). Except as otherwise stated in the report, the Author has not verified the accuracy of completeness of the data. To the extent that the statements, opinions, facts, information, conclusions and/or recommendations in the report (“conclusions”) are based in whole or part on the data, those conclusions are contingent upon the accuracy and completeness of the data. The Author will not be liable in relation to incorrect conclusions should any data, information or condition be incorrect or have been concealed, withheld, misrepresented or otherwise not fully disclosed to the Author. The report has been prepared for the benefit of the Client and no other party. The Author assumes no responsibility and will not be liable to any other person or organisation for or in relation to any matter dealt with or conclusions expressed in the report, or for any loss or damage suffered by any other person or organisation arising from matters dealt with or conclusions expressed in the report (including without limitation matters arising from any negligent act or omission of the Author or for any loss or damage suffered by any other party relying upon the matters dealt with or conclusions expressed in the report). Other parties should not rely upon the report or the accuracy or completeness of any conclusions and should make their own enquiries and obtain independent advice in relation to such matters. The Author will not be liable to update or revise the report to take into account any events or emergent circumstances or facts occurring or becoming apparent after the date of the report. Page i MARILLANA IRON ORE PROJECT - CAMP, ROAD AND AIRSTRIP (OPT B) – L 1 FAUNA SURVEY – OCT ‘11 – V2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report details the results of a Level 1 fauna assessment of Brockman Resources Limited proposed camp, road and airstrip (Option B) situated near their Marillana Iron Ore Project area, about 50km east of Auski Roadhouse (Munjina) in the Pilbara, Western Australia (Figure 1). The Option B area that required survey totalled about 200 ha and was comprised of the airstrip (~170 ha - 2km long and 150m wide), camp areas (~18 ha) and the road corridor (~14 ha – 4.5km long and 35m wide). The assessment has included a desktop study, which included a review of available fauna related data for the area and a field reconnaissance survey. Field survey work was carried out by Greg Harewood (B.Sc. Zoology) during a two day period on the 26th and 27th September, 2011. The broad scale fauna habitats within the study area are based on vegetation structure as identified during the flora and vegetation survey (Botanica 2011). The location and approximate extent of each identified unit is shown in Figure 3 with a description below. More detail on the vegetation units present can be found in the flora and vegetation report (Botanica 2011). x Open Low Woodland (Acacia pteraneura) over Grassland (Triodia basedowii). x Very Open Shrub Mallee (Euclayptus odontocarpa/Hakea lorea)over Grassland (Triodia basedowii). x Open Low Woodland (Acacia ptetraneura) over Sparse Scrub (Acacia bivenosa). x Open Low Shrub (Acacia victoriae) over Open Dwarf Scrub (Frankenia ambita) Plates 1 to 4 illustrate the nature of the main fauna
Recommended publications
  • Birding Nsw Birding

    Birding Nsw Birding

    Birding NSW Newsletter Page 1 birding NewsletterNewsletter NSWNSW FieldField OrnithologistsOrnithologists ClubClub IncInc nsw IssueIssue 287287 JuneJune -- JulyJuly 20182018 President’s Report I am pleased to inform you that Ross Crates, who is doing We had 30 surveyors, some of whom were new. One of important work on the endangered Regent Honeyeater, the strengths of the survey is that while some surveyors will receive the money from this year’s NSW Twitchathon cannot attend every survey, there are enough new people fund-raising event. This decision was made at the recent that there is a pool of about 30 surveyors for each event. Bird Interest Group network (BIGnet) meeting at Sydney Most surveyors saw Superb Parrots in March. Olympic Park. At this meeting, it was also agreed At the club meetings in April and May, we were fortunate unanimously that in future, all BIGnet clubs would have to have had two superb lectures from the National Parks an equal opportunity to submit proposals annually for and Wildlife Service branch of the Office of Environment funding support from the Twitchathon in NSW, replacing and Heritage, one by Principal Scientist Nicholas Carlile the previous protocol of alternating annual decision- on Gould’s Petrels, and another by Ranger Martin Smith making between NSW clubs and BirdLife Southern NSW. on the Little Tern and other shorebirds. Both speakers Allan Richards led a highly successful campout to Ingelba were obviously highly committed to their work and to the near Walcha on the Easter Long Weekend. One of the National Parks and Wildlife Service. At a time of major highlights was great views of platypuses.
  • Gliding Dragons and Flying Squirrels: Diversifying Versus Stabilizing Selection on Morphology Following the Evolution of an Innovation

    Gliding Dragons and Flying Squirrels: Diversifying Versus Stabilizing Selection on Morphology Following the Evolution of an Innovation

    vol. 195, no. 2 the american naturalist february 2020 E-Article Gliding Dragons and Flying Squirrels: Diversifying versus Stabilizing Selection on Morphology following the Evolution of an Innovation Terry J. Ord,1,* Joan Garcia-Porta,1,† Marina Querejeta,2,‡ and David C. Collar3 1. Evolution and Ecology Research Centre and the School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales 2052, Australia; 2. Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC–Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37–49, Barcelona 08003, Spain; 3. Department of Organismal and Environmental Biology, Christopher Newport University, Newport News, Virginia 23606 Submitted August 1, 2018; Accepted July 16, 2019; Electronically published December 17, 2019 Online enhancements: supplemental material. Dryad data: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.t7g227h. fi abstract: Evolutionary innovations and ecological competition are eral de nitions of what represents an innovation have been factors often cited as drivers of adaptive diversification. Yet many offered (reviewed by Rabosky 2017), this classical descrip- innovations result in stabilizing rather than diversifying selection on tion arguably remains the most useful (Galis 2001; Stroud morphology, and morphological disparity among coexisting species and Losos 2016; Rabosky 2017). Hypothesized innovations can reflect competitive exclusion (species sorting) rather than sympat- have drawn considerable attention among ecologists and ric adaptive divergence (character displacement). We studied the in- evolutionary biologists because they can expand the range novation of gliding in dragons (Agamidae) and squirrels (Sciuridae) of ecological niches occupied within communities. In do- and its effect on subsequent body size diversification. We found that gliding either had no impact (squirrels) or resulted in strong stabilizing ing so, innovations are thought to be important engines of selection on body size (dragons).
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii

    Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii

    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
  • Level 1 Fauna Survey of the Gruyere Gold Project Borefields (Harewood 2016)

    Level 1 Fauna Survey of the Gruyere Gold Project Borefields (Harewood 2016)

    GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LIMITED GRUYERE PROJECT EPA REFERRAL SUPPORTING DOCUMENT APPENDIX 5: LEVEL 1 FAUNA SURVEY OF THE GRUYERE GOLD PROJECT BOREFIELDS (HAREWOOD 2016) Gruyere EPA Ref Support Doc Final Rev 1.docx Fauna Assessment (Level 1) Gruyere Borefield Project Gold Road Resources Limited January 2016 Version 3 On behalf of: Gold Road Resources Limited C/- Botanica Consulting PO Box 2027 BOULDER WA 6432 T: 08 9093 0024 F: 08 9093 1381 Prepared by: Greg Harewood Zoologist PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 T/F: (08) 9725 0982 E: [email protected] GRUYERE BOREFIELD PROJECT –– GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LTD – FAUNA ASSESSMENT (L1) – JAN 2016 – V3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1 2. SCOPE OF WORKS ...............................................................................................1 3. RELEVANT LEGISTALATION ................................................................................2 4. METHODS...............................................................................................................3 4.1 POTENTIAL VETEBRATE FAUNA INVENTORY - DESKTOP SURVEY ............. 3 4.1.1 Database Searches.......................................................................................3 4.1.2 Previous Fauna Surveys in the Area ............................................................3 4.1.3 Existing Publications .....................................................................................5 4.1.4 Fauna
  • Background Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment

    Background Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment

    Our ref: EEN18041.003 Level 2, 27-31 Troode Street West Perth WA 6005 T +61 8 9211 1111 Date: 04 June 2019 Tanya McColgan Bellevue Gold Limited Suite 3, Level 3, 24 Outram Street WEST PERTH WA 6008 Dear Tanya, Flora and vegetation values identified within PoW 79431 In response to your request for the preliminary results of the detailed flora and vegetation assessment undertaken over the Bellevue Gold Project area, RPS Australia West Pty Ltd (RPS) herein provides a summary of the key results and outcomes of the assessment in lieu of the final report which is due in July. Background Bellevue Gold Ltd (Bellevue Gold) is currently undertaking an exploration drilling program within mining tenement M3625 for the Bellevue Gold Project (the Project). The Project is located in the north-eastern Goldfields; approximately 40 km north of the township of Leinster in the Shire of Leonora. The Project is situated on and surrounded by pastoral lands and is located on Yakabindie cattle station. RPS was commissioned by Bellevue Gold to undertake a detailed flora and vegetation assessment over M3625 and part of M3624 to encompass the area where exploration drilling is currently underway and including the potential mining and associated infrastructure footprint (the proposed development area). The survey area, the proposed development area and the PoW 79431 area are shown in Figure A. RPS understands that the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) and the Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions (DBCA) have requested additional information regarding the natural values of the PoW area, where in-fill drilling is proposed, in order to adequately assess the PoW application.
  • The Fauna of Boonanarring Nature Reserve

    The Fauna of Boonanarring Nature Reserve

    The Fauna of Boonanarring Nature Reserve. Tracey Moore, Tracy Sonneman, Alice Reaveley, Karen Bettink, Barbara Wilson. i Department of Parks and Wildlife Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, 6983 Western Australia Telephone: +61-8-9442 0300 Facsimile: +61-8-9386 6399 www.dpaw.wa.gov.au © Government of Western Australia, May 2015 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Department of Parks and Wildlife. Project team: Karen Bettink, Nicole Godfrey, Ben Kreplins, Tracey Moore, Craig Olejnik, Tracy Sonneman, Alice Reaveley, Barbara Wilson Acknowledgements: Astron Environmental Consulting Project contact: Tracey Moore; [email protected] i Table of Contents The fauna of Boonanarring Nature Reserve. ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. Introduction and Background ................................................................................................................. 1 Methods .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Location and vegetation .....................................................................................................................
  • An Annotated Type Catalogue of the Dragon Lizards (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) in the Collection of the Western Australian Museum Ryan J

    An Annotated Type Catalogue of the Dragon Lizards (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) in the Collection of the Western Australian Museum Ryan J

    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 34 115–132 (2019) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.34(2).2019.115-132 An annotated type catalogue of the dragon lizards (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) in the collection of the Western Australian Museum Ryan J. Ellis Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia. Biologic Environmental Survey, 24–26 Wickham St, East Perth, Western Australia 6004, Australia. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT – The Western Australian Museum holds a vast collection of specimens representing a large portion of the 106 currently recognised taxa of dragon lizards (family Agamidae) known to occur across Australia. While the museum’s collection is dominated by Western Australian species, it also contains a selection of specimens from localities in other Australian states and a small selection from outside of Australia. Currently the museum’s collection contains 18,914 agamid specimens representing 89 of the 106 currently recognised taxa from across Australia and 27 from outside of Australia. This includes 824 type specimens representing 45 currently recognised taxa and three synonymised taxa, comprising 43 holotypes, three syntypes and 779 paratypes. Of the paratypes, a total of 43 specimens have been gifted to other collections, disposed or could not be located and are considered lost. An annotated catalogue is provided for all agamid type material currently and previously maintained in the herpetological collection of the Western Australian Museum. KEYWORDS: type specimens, holotype, syntype, paratype, dragon lizard, nomenclature. INTRODUCTION Australia was named by John Edward Gray in 1825, The Agamidae, commonly referred to as dragon Clamydosaurus kingii Gray, 1825 [now Chlamydosaurus lizards, comprises over 480 taxa worldwide, occurring kingii (Gray, 1825)].
  • Square Kilometre Array Ecological Assessment Commercial-In-Confidence

    Square Kilometre Array Ecological Assessment Commercial-In-Confidence

    AECOM SKA Ecological Assessment A Square Kilometre Array Ecological Assessment Commercial-in-Confidence Appendix A Conservation Categories G:\60327857 - SKA EcologicalSurvey\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\Ecological Assessment\60327857-SKA Ecological Report_Rev0.docx Revision 0 – 28-Nov-2014 Prepared for – Department of Industry – ABN: 74 599 608 295 AECOM SKA Ecological Assessment A-1 Square Kilometre Array Ecological Assessment Commercial-in-Confidence Appendix A Conservation Categories G:\60327857 - SKA EcologicalSurvey\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\Ecological Assessment\60327857-SKA Ecological Report_Rev0.docx Revision 0 – 28-Nov-2014 Prepared for – Department of Industry – ABN: 74 599 608 295 Definitions of Threatened and Priority Flora Species 1 Appendix A – Conservation Categories 1.1 Western Australia Plants and animals that are considered threatened and need to be specially protected because they are under identifiable threat of extinction are listed under the Wildlife Conservation Act (WC Act). These categories are defined in Table 1. Any species identified as Threatened under the WC Act is assigned a threat category using the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List categories and criteria. Species that have not yet been adequately surveyed to warrant being listed under Schedule 1 or 2 are added to the Priority Flora or Fauna Lists under Priority 1, 2 or 3. Species that are adequately known, are rare but not threatened, or meet criteria for Near Threatened, or that have been recently removed from the threatened list for other than taxonomic reasons, are placed in Priority 4 and require regular monitoring. Conservation Dependent species and ecological communities are placed in Priority 5.

  • Macquarie River Bird Trail

    Bird Watching Trail Guide Acknowledgements RiverSmart Australia Limited would like to thank the following for their assistance in making this trail and publication a reality. Tim and Janis Hosking, and the other members of the Dubbo Field Naturalists and Conservation Society, who assisted with technical information about the various sites, the bird list and with some of the photos. Thanks also to Jim Dutton for providing bird list details for the Burrendong Arboretum. Photographers. Photographs were kindly provided by Brian O’Leary, Neil Zoglauer, Julian Robinson, Lisa Minner, Debbie Love, Tim Hosking, Dione Carter, Dan Giselsson, Tim Ralph and Bill Phillips. This project received financial support from the Australian Bird Environment Foundation of Sacred kingfisher photo: Dan Giselsson BirdLife Australia. Thanks to Warren Shire Council, Sarah Derrett and Ashley Wielinga in particular, for their assistance in relation to the Tiger Bay site. Thanks also to Philippa Lawrence, Sprout Design and Mapping Services Australia. THE MACQuarIE RIVER TraILS First published 2014 The Macquarie valley, in the heart of NSW is one of the The preparation of this guide was coordinated by the not-for-profit organisation Riversmart State’s — and indeed Australia’s — best kept secrets, until now. Australia Ltd. Please consider making a tax deductible donation to our blue bucket fund so we can keep doing our work in the interests of healthy and sustainable rivers. Macquarie River Trails (www.rivertrails.com.au), launched in late 2011, is designed to let you explore the many attractions www.riversmart.org.au and wonders of this rich farming region, one that is blessed See outside back cover for more about our work with a vibrant river, the iconic Maquarie Marshes, friendly people and a laid back lifestyle.
  • Herpetological Notes. No.5

    Herpetological Notes. No.5

    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Kinghorn, J. Roy, 1955. Herpetological notes. No. 5. Records of the Australian Museum 23(5): 283–286, plate xiv. [1 September 1955]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.23.1955.638 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney naturenature cultureculture discover discover AustralianAustralian Museum Museum science science is is freely freely accessible accessible online online at at www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/ 66 CollegeCollege Street,Street, SydneySydney NSWNSW 2010,2010, AustraliaAustralia HERPETOLOGICAL NOTES No. 5. By J. R. KINGHORN. (Plate xiv; two Text-figures.) 1. TAXONOMIC OHANGES IN THE GENUS RHYNOHOELAPS. Recent investigation shows that Rhynchoelaps bertholdi belongs to an entirely different genus of snakes from other species generally placed in the same genus. R. b61,tholdi has what may be described as typical elapine type head scalation, whilst other members of the group have a shovel-shaped snout, with a more or less oblique arrangement of head shields, naturally conforming to the disposition of the bones of the skull. Only one member of the shovel-snouted group has a more or less normal type arrangement of shields, but it is quite distinct from bertholdi. This species is fasciolata, originally named Rhinelaps fasciolatus Gunther, but in this the nasal is widely separated from the preocular: J an, in Rev. et ];Jag. Zool., p. 5UI, Dec. 1858, first mentioned E. bertholdi with Rhynchoelap8 proposed as a subgenus, but there was no description. In the same magazine, 1859, 2, ii, p. 123 he uses the name Simoselaps, genotype E. bertholdi and gave a fairly full description; so it would appear that Simoselaps should be used; but bec,wse of common usage I propose a~ present to refer it to Rhynchoelaps bertholdi.
  • Fowlers Gap Biodiversity Checklist Reptiles

    Fowlers Gap Biodiversity Checklist Reptiles

    Fowlers Gap Biodiversity Checklist ow if there are so many lizards then they should make tasty N meals for someone. Many of the lizard-eaters come from their Reptiles own kind, especially the snake-like legless lizards and the snakes themselves. The former are completely harmless to people but the latter should be left alone and assumed to be venomous. Even so it odern reptiles are at the most diverse in the tropics and the is quite safe to watch a snake from a distance but some like the Md rylands of the world. The Australian arid zone has some of the Mulga Snake can be curious and this could get a little most diverse reptile communities found anywhere. In and around a disconcerting! single tussock of spinifex in the western deserts you could find 18 species of lizards. Fowlers Gap does not have any spinifex but even he most common lizards that you will encounter are the large so you do not have to go far to see reptiles in the warmer weather. Tand ubiquitous Shingleback and Central Bearded Dragon. The diversity here is as astonishing as anywhere. Imagine finding six They both have a tendency to use roads for passage, warming up or species of geckos ranging from 50-85 mm long, all within the same for display. So please slow your vehicle down and then take evasive genus. Or think about a similar diversity of striped skinks from 45-75 action to spare them from becoming a road casualty. The mm long! How do all these lizards make a living in such a dry and Shingleback is often seen alone but actually is monogamous and seemingly unproductive landscape? pairs for life.
  • For Peer Review Journal: Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

    For Peer Review Journal: Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

    Biological Journal of the Linnean Society The evolution of Australasian agamid lizards based on nuclear and mitochondrial genes, and the affinities of the thorny devil (Moloch horridus). For Peer Review Journal: Biological Journal of the Linnean Society Manuscript ID: BJLS-0023 Manuscript Type: Original Manuscript Date Submitted by the 26-Jun-2006 Author: Complete List of Authors: Hugall, Andrew; University of Adelaide, Earth and Environmental Sciences Foster, Ralph; South Australian Museum Lee, Michael; South Australian Museum Hutchinson, Mark; South Australian Museum agamidae, phylogeny, partition support, congruence, convergence, Keywords: molecular clock, aridification Biological Journal of the Linnean Society Page 1 of 33 Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 1 2 3 4 The evolution of Australasian agamid lizards based on nuclear and 5 mitochondrial genes, and the affinities of the thorny devil (Moloch 6 horridus). 7 8 9 A.F. Hugall1*, R. Foster2, M. Hutchinson2 and M.S.Y. Lee1,2 10 11 12 13 1 School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, SA 5005 14 2 15 Natural Sciences Building, South Australian Museum, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia 16 17 *Corresponding Author, E-mail [email protected], Fax +61 8 8303 4364 18 19 20 For Peer Review 21 Running title: Austral Agamid Phylogeny 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Biological Journal of the Linnean Society Biological Journal of the Linnean Society Page 2 of 33 Austral Agamid Phylogeny 2 1 2 3 ABSTRACT 4 5 6 7 Recent mtDNA phylogenies of Australasian agamid lizards are highly incongruent with 8 existing morphological views.