DOCSLIB.ORG

Intraspecific Genetic Variation Among Populations of Kenyan African Violet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intraspecific Genetic Variation Among Populations of Kenyan African Violet INTRASPECIFIC GENETIC VARIATION AMONG POPULATIONS OF KENYAN AFRICAN VIOLET. SAINTPAULIA RUPICOLA B. L. BURTT: A MOLECULAR APPROACH ^ r n:r BY SIMON MAIN A MACHARIA B.Ed Science (Egerton) A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the award of the degree of Master of Science in Botany mar DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI FEBRUARY, 1998 11 DECLARATION Declaration by the candidate I hereby declare that this thesis has not been submitted, either in the same or different form, to this or any other university for a degree. No part of this thesis may be reproduced without the prior permission of the author and/or University of Nairobi. , C i ^ f 4 1 ^ Simon Maina Macharia Date Declaration by the supervisors This thesis has been submitted with our approval as university supervisors. Ms\ II P r o f . r. K. Mulviurna D a t e 1st supervisor Chairman W a** Department of Botany V' University of Nairobi P. O. Boxl30197, Nairobi Id i t Dr. Rashid A. Aman Date 2nd supervisor Director, Research and Scientific Affairs National Museums of Kenya P. O. Box 40658, Nairobi DEDICATION To my mother, for your endless support and encouragement. To my daughter. Rachel and my son, Vickie, who have provided the driving force IV Acknowledgements A number of people deserve special acknowledgment in view of the invaluable support they gave me during my M.Sc course. In particular, I would like to thank Dr. Rashid Aman of the Department of Molecular Genetics. National Museums of Kenya (NMK) for providing most of the supervision for this work, and in whose lab its bulk has been carried out. I am also greatly indebted to Mr. Timothy Pearce of the Plant Conservation Programme (PCP), NMK for providing the initial funding for this project. Special thanks also go to the Board of Postgraduate Studies. University of Nairobi, for recommending me for a DAAD scholarship, and DAAD for providing the scholarship. I would also like to thank Prof. T. K. Mukiama of the Department of Botany, University of Nairobi for supporting my scholarship offer, and providing part of the supervision for this project especially through the final stages of preparation of this thesis. I am greatly indebted to Mr. Benny Bytebier of the PCP, NMK. who assisted me in the development of this project and personally guided me successfully through the field survey and provided part of the supervision for this project. Special thanks also go to Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Hachtel of the Botanisches Institut der Universitat Bonn, Germany, for offering me a chance to work in his lab for six months. I am also greatly indebted to Prof. Eric Knox of Rutgers University, USA, during his tenure at the NMK, for a lot of invaluable advice throughout the course of the project, and for providing me with tobacco chloroplast DNA probes used in the initial survey of this project. A big thank you to the members of the Department of Molecular Genetics, NMK for the bulk of technical training and support and providing a conducive and enjoyable environment in which I successfully completed this project. Last but by no means least. I would like to convey my special thanks to my parents, relatives, friends and all those who contributed in any way towards the successful completion of this study for their unwavering love, patience and encouragement during the course of this study. And to my friend Ngige. thank you for assisting me in printing! VI TABLE OF CONTENTS Title ............................................................................................................................... i Declaration................................................................................................................... ii Dedication ..................................................................................................................iii Acknowledgements ................................................. iv Table of contents ....................................................................................................... vi List of figures ........................................................................................................ Xi List of ta b le s.............................................................................................................. xii List of p la te s............................................................................................................. xiii Symbols/Abbreviations............................................................................................. xiv A bstract................................................................................................................... xviii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION, LITERATURE REVIEW AND STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM ........................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction..................................................................................... 1 1.0. 1 The African V iolets......................................................................... 2 1.0. 2 The African violet as an endangered sp ecies............................... 2 1.0. 3 Saintpaulia rupicola......................................................................... 3 1.0. 4 Conservation efforts at the National Museums of K enya............ 4 1.0. 5 Statement of the problem...................................................................... 6 1.0. 6 Specific objectives................................................................................. 6 1.0. 7 Questions to be addressed ....................................................................6 1.1 Literature review ................................................................................ 7 1.1.1 Classification status of the African V io le ts................................. 7 1.1.2 Genomes available for DNA analysis in plant and animal taxa . 7 vii Table of contents continued 1.1.2.1 Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) ..................................................... 8 1.1.2.2 The chloroplast genome .................................................................... 10 1.1.2.3 Ribosomal D N A ..................................................................................11 1.1.2.3.1 The Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS).......................................... 13 1.1.2.3.2 Structure of the ITS region ........................................................... 14 1.2 DNA techniques for determining genetic variation in plants . 14 1.2.1 Restriction site analysis.................................................................. 14 1.2.2 Randomly amplified Polymorphic DNA sequences (RAPDs) . 17 1.2.3 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and DNA sequencing .... 18 CHAPTER 2 .........................................................................................................20 MATERIALS AND METHODS ....................................................................... 20 2.0 Collection of plant material from the field ............................................... 20 2.0. 1 Collection of Saintpaulia sp nov. samples from Kacharoroni ............. 22 2.0. 2 Collection of S. rupicola samples from Cha Simba .............................. 22 2.0. 3 Collection of Saintpaulia rupicola samples from Mwarakaya ............. 23 2.0. 4 Collection of Saintpaulia sp. nov. samples from Mwache ................... 23 2.1 Extraction of DNA ...................................................................................... 26 2.1.1 Isolation of total (genomic) DNA: The CTAB procedure...................... 26 2.1.2 Extraction of replicative form (RF) plasmid DNA from E. c o li.................27 2.2 Determination of the amount of the D N A ............................................... 28 2.3 CsCl purification of genomic D N A ................................................. 29 Table of contents continued 2.4 Agarose gel electrophoresis........................................................................ 30 2.5 PCR amplification or ITS region ............................................................. 31 2.6 Purification of the PCR product............................................................... 32 2.7 Cloning of purified PCR product ............................................................. 33 2.7.1 Selection of recombinant v e c to r............................................................... 34 2.7.2 Colour selection........................................................................................... 34 2.7.3 Selection by PCR amplification ............................................................... 34 2.7.4 Small-scale preparation of replicative form (RF) plasmid DNA ............................................................................................................ 35 2.8 DNA sequencing........................................................................................ 35 2.8.1 Sequencing of recombinant plasmid D N A ............................................... 35 2.8.2 Direct sequencing of the PCR p ro d u ct................................................... 36 2.9 Preparation of sequencing gel and electrophoresis................................. 36 3.0.0 Alignment and analysis of DNA sequences ........................................... 38 CHAPTER 3 ......................................................................................................... 39 RESULTS .............................................................................................................. 39 3.0 Extraction and quantification of genomic DNA ......................... 39 3.1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Orticulturist News Edition-May 1983
    RICAN ORTICULTURIST NEWS EDITION-MAY 1983 Join Us in Philadelphia Society members from across the country will be gathering in Phila­ delphia for our 38th Annual Meet­ ing this September 14-18. Philadel­ phia was not only the cradle of liberty in the 18th century, it was also the cradle of American horticul­ ture, nurtured by the Bartrams and a host of botanists, plant collectors, seedsmen, naturalists and horticul­ turists living in and around the Del­ aware Valley from the colony's very founding in 1683. With its rich gar­ den history and tradition, this city is regarded as the gateway to the gar­ dens of America. Today it boasts more gardens and arboreta accessi­ ble to the public than any city in the nation. This is a city proudly aware of its garden heritage, as evidenced by the collaborative projects of its many garden institutions, and by its popular and prestigious Philadelphia Flower Show in the spring. The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society, which sponsors that mighty show, is graciously helping us plan an exciting program for you, our members, this fall. Among the activ­ ities planned will be a cocktail re­ ception at the P.H.S. headquarters; morning lecture and panel discus­ The Morris Arboretum is one of the gardens the Society will visit during its September sions; and afternoon bus tours to Annual Meeting in Philadelphia. the Main Line, Longwood, the Wil­ mington area and the Brandywine include the outstanding Duke Gar­ will visit the Planting Fields Arbore­ Valley, where we will visit both dens in New Jersey, the Princeton tum and Old Westbury Gardens.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants Given RHS Exhibition Awards from 2008–2010
    HanbUryana 6: 83–139 (2012) 83 Plants given RHS Exhibition Awards 2008–2010 C.M. WhiTehOUse & J.J. CUbey RHS Garden Wisley, Surrey GU23 6QB The following list of 416 awards has been compiled from the plant award descriptions written by Plant Committee Secretaries, or in the case of the Orchid Committee by Johan and Clare Hermans, for the period from September 2008 until the end of December 2010. Awards made prior to this that were confirmed during this period, following, for example, application or registration of a cultivar name, are also included. References to further information and catalogued herbarium specimens and images relating to plant awards are included. Anyone wishing to visit the Herbarium at Wisley, to view the herbarium specimens or images, should contact the Keeper of the Herbarium. Paintings are commissioned for many orchids that are given awards and these can be consulted by contacting the RHS Lindley Library. References such as 155D refer to colours in the RHS Colour Chart (Fifth edition, 2007).1 For enquiries regarding these awards please email plantcommittees@rhs. org.uk or telephone 0845 260 9000. These will then be forwarded to the appropriate Plant Committee Secretary or member of staff. Key AM Award of Merit BC Botanical Certificate (awarded to the species) E Exhibited by D Description DCP Description & colour photograph FCC First Class Certificate PC Certificate of Preliminary Commendation R Raised by S Submitted by § As a flowering plant for exhibition * As a hardy flowering plant for exhibition † As a tender flowering plant for exhibition ‡ As a flowering plant for cultivation in containers 1 Available from RHS Enterprises mail order ([email protected] or telephone 01483 211320).
    [Show full text]
  • Lamiales – Synoptical Classification Vers
    Lamiales – Synoptical classification vers. 2.6.2 (in prog.) Updated: 12 April, 2016 A Synoptical Classification of the Lamiales Version 2.6.2 (This is a working document) Compiled by Richard Olmstead With the help of: D. Albach, P. Beardsley, D. Bedigian, B. Bremer, P. Cantino, J. Chau, J. L. Clark, B. Drew, P. Garnock- Jones, S. Grose (Heydler), R. Harley, H.-D. Ihlenfeldt, B. Li, L. Lohmann, S. Mathews, L. McDade, K. Müller, E. Norman, N. O’Leary, B. Oxelman, J. Reveal, R. Scotland, J. Smith, D. Tank, E. Tripp, S. Wagstaff, E. Wallander, A. Weber, A. Wolfe, A. Wortley, N. Young, M. Zjhra, and many others [estimated 25 families, 1041 genera, and ca. 21,878 species in Lamiales] The goal of this project is to produce a working infraordinal classification of the Lamiales to genus with information on distribution and species richness. All recognized taxa will be clades; adherence to Linnaean ranks is optional. Synonymy is very incomplete (comprehensive synonymy is not a goal of the project, but could be incorporated). Although I anticipate producing a publishable version of this classification at a future date, my near- term goal is to produce a web-accessible version, which will be available to the public and which will be updated regularly through input from systematists familiar with taxa within the Lamiales. For further information on the project and to provide information for future versions, please contact R. Olmstead via email at [email protected], or by regular mail at: Department of Biology, Box 355325, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • And the Genetics of Flower Pattern (Lawrence, 1958) Have Been Described
    STUDIES ON STREPTOCARPUS Lindi. V.SPECIATION AND GENE SYSTEMS W. J. C. LAWRENCE John Innes Horticultural Institution, Hert ford, Herts. Received22.X.57 1. INTRODUCTION INprevious papers the genetics and chemistry of flower colour in Streptocarpus (Lawrence et al., 1939 ; Lawrence and Sturgess, 1958) and the genetics of flower pattern (Lawrence, 1958) have been described. This paper completes the survey of Streptocarpus, gathers up the whole of the results and discusses their meaning. 2. TAXONOMYOF SPECIES (I) Habit Onthe basis of habit, Streptocarpus Lindl. falls naturally into two perfectly distinct sub-genera (Fritsch, 1904), Streptocarpella which comprises the caulescent species with stems (plate I, fig. i) and Eustreptocarpus *theacaulescent species without stems (plates, figs. 2-5). Fritsch further divided Eustreptocarpus, again on habit, into two sections, unifoliati with one leaf and rosulati with many leaves. Burtt (1939), however, has pointed out that "there does not seem to be a hard and fast line "betweenthese two sections. From observations I have made in the course of the studies on Streptocarpus, it has become clear that selection can produce unifoliates having a large second leaf born opposite the first one, or even a small third leaf.Further, plants raised from seed gathered in the wild from unifoliates may develop a second leaf. In the large-leaved unifoliates, e.g. grandis, dunnii, wendlandii, the additional leaves could be regarded as aberrant. In certain small- leaved "unifoliates"however, the production of a second or third leaf is characteristic, e.g. gracilis ; in others, a second leaf is very rarely formed, e.g. polyanthus.It will be convenient to distinguish these small-leaved true unifoliates and near-unifoliates as "sub-unifoliates", reservingthe term unifoliates for the large-leaved species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Linderniaceae and Gratiolaceae Are Further Lineages Distinct from the Scrophulariaceae (Lamiales)
    Research Paper 1 The Linderniaceae and Gratiolaceae are further Lineages Distinct from the Scrophulariaceae (Lamiales) R. Rahmanzadeh1, K. Müller2, E. Fischer3, D. Bartels1, and T. Borsch2 1 Institut für Molekulare Physiologie und Biotechnologie der Pflanzen, Universität Bonn, Kirschallee 1, 53115 Bonn, Germany 2 Nees-Institut für Biodiversität der Pflanzen, Universität Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee 170, 53115 Bonn, Germany 3 Institut für Integrierte Naturwissenschaften ± Biologie, Universität Koblenz-Landau, Universitätsstraûe 1, 56070 Koblenz, Germany Received: July 14, 2004; Accepted: September 22, 2004 Abstract: The Lamiales are one of the largest orders of angio- Traditionally, Craterostigma, Lindernia and their relatives have sperms, with about 22000 species. The Scrophulariaceae, as been treated as members of the family Scrophulariaceae in the one of their most important families, has recently been shown order Lamiales (e.g., Takhtajan,1997). Although it is well estab- to be polyphyletic. As a consequence, this family was re-classi- lished that the Plocospermataceae and Oleaceae are their first fied and several groups of former scrophulariaceous genera branching families (Bremer et al., 2002; Hilu et al., 2003; Soltis now belong to different families, such as the Calceolariaceae, et al., 2000), little is known about the evolutionary diversifica- Plantaginaceae, or Phrymaceae. In the present study, relation- tion of most of the orders diversity. The Lamiales branching ships of the genera Craterostigma, Lindernia and its allies, hith- above the Plocospermataceae and Oleaceae are called ªcore erto classified within the Scrophulariaceae, were analyzed. Se- Lamialesº in the following text. The most recent classification quences of the chloroplast trnK intron and the matK gene by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG2, 2003) recognizes (~ 2.5 kb) were generated for representatives of all major line- 20 families.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Streptocarpus Primulifolius (Gesneriaceae)
    168 S.Afr.I.Bot., 1994, 60(3): 168 - 169 Notes on Streptocarpus primulifolius (Gesneriaceae) M. Weigend and T.J. Edwards· U.N. Unit for Plant Growth and Development, Botany Department, University of Natal, P.O. Box 375, Pietermaritzburg, 3200 Republic of South Africa Received 26 October 1993; revised 11 March 1994 During a re-evaluation of the taxonomy of Streptocarpus cyaneus S. Moore it became apparent that an entity inter­ mediate between that species and S. primulifolius Gand. deserves formal recognition, and it is described as S. floribundus. In addition, the subspecies of S. primulifolius are raised to species rank as S. formosus (Hilliard & Burtt) T.J. Edwards and S. primulifolius. Tydens 'n herevaluering van die taksonomie van Streptocarpus cyaneus S. Moore het dit geblyk dat daar 'n entiteit bestaan tussen die spesie en S. primulifolius Gand. wat formele erkenning verdien. Die nuwe spesie is beskryf as S. floribundus. Hierbenewens word die subspesies van S. primulifolius tot spesievlak verhef as S. formosus (Hil­ liard & Burtt) T.J. Edwards en S. primulifolius. Keywords: Gesneriaceae, Streptocarpus, taxonomy. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. Introduction extending just onto the limb. Stamens 10 - 12 mm long; Taxonomists involved in the clarification of species concepts filaments pale purple, glabrous basally, sparsely glandular within higher plants frequently encounter taxa where breeding distally; anthers 3.5 X 1.5 mm, purple; posterior staminode barriers are poorly developed. Streptocarpus is one such genus. minute, lateral staminodes ca. 2 mm long. Pol/en prolate, 20 X Different species frequently interbreed and thus the concepts of 12 ~m, tricolpate, exine microreticulate and minutely scabrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2012 - 45 President’S Message ~ Summer 2012
    THE HARDY FERN FOUNDATION P.O. Box 3797 Federal Way, WA 98063-3797 Web site: www.hardyfernfoundation.org The Hardy Fern Foundation was founded in 1989 to establish a comprehen¬ sive collection of the world’s hardy ferns for display, testing, evaluation, public education and introduction to the gardening and horticultural community. Many rare and unusual species, hybrids and varieties are being propagated from spores and tested in selected environments for their different degrees of hardiness and ornamental garden value. The primary fern display and test garden is located at, and in conjunction with, The Rhododendron Species Botanical Garden at the Weyerhaeuser Corporate Headquarters, in Federal Way, Washington. Affiliate fern gardens are at the Bainbridge Island Library, Bainbridge Island, Washington; Bellevue Botanical Garden, Bellevue, Washington; Birmingham Botanical Gardens, Birmingham, Alabama; Coastal Maine Botanical Garden, Boothbay, Maine; Dallas Arboretum, Dallas, Texas; Denver Botanic Gardens, Denver, Colorado; Georgia Perimeter College Garden, Decatur, Georgia; Inniswood Metro Gardens, Columbus, Ohio; Lakewold, Tacoma, Washington; Lotusland, Santa Barbara, California; Rotary Gardens, Janesville, Wisconsin; Strybing Arboretum, San Francisco, California; University of California Berkeley Botanical Garden, Berkeley, California; and Whitehall Historic Home and Garden, Louisville, Kentucky. Hardy Fern Foundation members participate in a spore exchange, receive a quarterly newsletter and have first access to ferns as they are ready
    [Show full text]
  • Studies of Vegetative Growth, Inflorescence Development and Eco-Dormancy Formation of Abscission Layers in Streptocarpus Formosu
    horticulturae Article Studies of Vegetative Growth, Inflorescence Development and Eco-Dormancy Formation of Abscission Layers in Streptocarpus formosus (Gesneriaceae) Cherise Christina Viljoen, Muhali Olaide Jimoh and Charles Petrus Laubscher * Department of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, P.O. Box 1906, Bellville, Symphony Way, Cape Town 7535, South Africa; [email protected] (C.C.V.); [email protected] (M.O.J.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Streptocarpus formosus (Hilliard & B.L. Burtt) T.J. Edwards is a flowering herbaceous perennial indigenous to South Africa and is part of the rosulate group of herbaceous acaulescent plants within the Gesneriaceae family. According to the National Assessment database for the Red List of South African Plants version 2020.1., the plant is listed as rare. The ornamental use of S. formosus has untapped commercial potential as a flowering indoor pot plant, an outdoor bedding plant for shade and as a cut flower for the vase, all of which are limited by a five-month eco-dormancy period during the late autumn and all through the cold season in the short-day winter months. Viable commercial production will require cultivation techniques that produce flowering plants all year round. This study investigated the effectiveness of applying root zone heating to S. formosus plants grown in deep water culture hydroponics during the eco-dormancy period in preventing abscission layer formation and in encouraging flowering and assessed the growth activity response of the plants. Citation: Viljoen, C.C.; Jimoh, M.O.; The experiment was conducted over eight weeks during the winter season in the greenhouse at Laubscher, C.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Primula Sieboldii: Visiting and Growing Sakurasoh, by Paul Held 19
    ROCK GARDEN ^^S^OrT QUARTERLY VOLUME 55 NUMBER 1 WINTER 1997 COVER: Oenothera caespitosa at dusk, by Dick Van Reyper All Material Copyright © 1997 North American Rock Garden Society Printed by AgPress, 1531 Yuma Street, Manhattan, Kansas 66502 ROCK GARDEN QUARTERLY BULLETIN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN ROCK GARDEN SOCIETY formerly Bulletin of the American Rock Garden Society VOLUME 55 NUMBER 1 WINTER 1997 FEATURES Living Souvenirs: An Urban Horticultural Expedition to Japan, by Carole P. Smith 3 Primula sieboldii: Visiting and Growing Sakurasoh, by Paul Held 19 Paradise Regained: South Africa in Late Summer, by Panayoti Kelaidis 31 Erythroniums: Naturalizing with the Best, by William A. Dale 47 Geographical Names: European Plants, Geoffrey Charlesworth 53 Gentiana scabra: Musings from a Rock Garden, by Alexej Borkovec 60 Phyllodoce: A Supra-Sphagnum Way of Growing, by Phil Zimmerman 63 2 ROCK GARDEN QUARTERLY VOL. 55(1) LIVING SOUVENIRS: AN URBAN EXPEDITION TO JAPAN by Carole P. Smith AA^hat is the best way to satisfy I might visit. Forty-five letters were all your gardening yens in a foreign sent, and I expected to receive five or country—if you want to explore the six replies. To my amazement, twenty- finest public gardens, receive invita• five letters and faxes quickly arrived, tions to private gardens, shop the best along with maps and directions to nurseries for specimen purchases? nurseries. Several people offered to How do you plan efficiently for costly accompany us to nurseries or invited travel when language limitations and us to visit their gardens or the gardens social conventions (such as introduc• of friends.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 UDBG Spring Plant Sale Catalog
    Our gates are open wide! Enjoy the region’s finest wildflower garden all spring, summer and fall. Every Friday and Saturday from April 19th to November 10th, Mt. Cuba Center will be open from 10AM to 4PM. Get involved in discovery stations and behind-the-scenes excursions that focus on what’s in bloom around you. No reservations required. $6 Adults, $4 Ages 5-16, Free for children under 5. Guided tours of the garden are available on Thursdays and Sundays. Our friendly and knowledgeable docents will lead you on an intimate 2-hour visit that focuses on the history, design and plant diversity that makes Mt. Cuba Center a unique local treasure. Reservations required. $10. “I want this to be a place where people will learn to appreciate our native plants and to see how these Trumpet-creeper plants can enrich their lives so that (Campsis radicans) they, in turn, will become conservators of our natural habitats.” - Mrs. Lammot du Pont Copeland Hockessin, DE PH: 302-239-4244 www.MtCubaCenter.Org INSPIRATION | EDUCATION | CONSERVATION WELCOME I welcome you to the twenty first annual UDBG benefit plant sale. The arrival of this catalog is a good sign that spring is near. Receiving spring catalogs is like receiving the old Sears catalog before Christmas. Time to 2013 BENEFIT PLANT SALE CATALOG peruse the pages, sift through the plant descriptions, make your list (and check it twice), and envision the additions in your garden. You can almost feel the warm spring breeze and smell the colors of spring. This year’s featured plant is flowering quince, an old time favorite that is regaining popularity, due in part to the amazing new cultivars.
    [Show full text]
  • GESNERIACEAE Within the Genus Streptocarpus The
    192 Bothalia 22,2 (1992) long in C. sessiliflora). In the latter the standard is ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS orbicular and very shortly clawed, versus obovate to sub- I am grateful to Dr H.F. Glen (National Botanical orbicular with a longer claw in C. squamosa. Institute, Pretoria) for the Latin translation and to Prof. B-E. van Wyk for commenting on the manuscript. The C. squamosa is a rare legume known only from the directors and staff of the mentioned herbaria are also type locality on the Wemmershoek Mountains in the south­ thanked for the loan of specimens. western Cape Province (Figure 10). The conspicuous persistent petioles and very short intemodes, giving REFERENCES the branches a scaly appearance, are useful diag­ nostic characters for this species, hence the specific KIES, P. 1951. Revision of the genus Cyclopia and notes on some other epithet. sources of bush tea. Bothalia 6: 161-176. A.L. SCHUTTE* CAPE.—3319 (Worcester): Paarl District, Wemmershoek Peak, on cliff and at base of cliff, on steep southern slope, (-C C ), 25-10-1981, * Department of Botany, Rand Afrikaans University, P.O. Box 524, Esterhuysen 35695 (BOL, holo.; C, K, S, iso.), 04-04-1982, Esterhuysen Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006. 35764 (BOL, C). MS. received: 1992-03-18 STILBACEAE STILBE VEKT1C1LLATA, THE CORRECT NAME FOR THE SPECIES PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS STILBE MUCRONATA During the course of revising the Cape endemic family Stilbe mucronata N.E. Br. var. cuspidata H.H.W. Pearson: 184 (1901). Stilbaceae, it has come to my attention that the name of Stilbe verticillata (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Moldenke var.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Lamiidae Reveals Increased Resolution and Support for Internal Relationships That Have Remained Elusive
    American Journal of Botany 101(2): 287–299. 2014. P HYLOGENY OF LAMIIDAE 1 N ANCY F . R EFULIO-RODRIGUEZ 2 AND R ICHARD G. OLMSTEAD 2,3 2 Department of Biology, Box 355325, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 USA • Premise of the study: The Lamiidae, a clade composed of approximately 15% of all fl owering plants, consists of fi ve orders: Boraginales, Gentianales, Garryales, Lamiales, and Solanales; and four families unplaced in an order: Icacinaceae, Metteniusi- aceae, Oncothecaceae, and Vahliaceae. Our understanding of the phylogenetic relationships of Lamiidae has improved signifi - cantly in recent years, however, relationships among the orders and unplaced families of the clade remain partly unresolved. Here, we present a phylogenetic analysis of the Lamiidae based on an expanded sampling, including all families together, for the fi rst time, in a single phylogenetic analyses. • Methods: Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Analyses included nine plastid regions ( atpB , matK , ndhF , psbBTNH , rbcL , rps4 , rps16 , trnL - F , and trnV - atpE ) and the mitochondrial rps3 region, and 129 samples representing all orders and unplaced families of Lamiidae. • Key results: Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian trees provide good support for Boraginales sister to Lamiales, with successive outgroups (Solanales + Vahlia) and Gentianales, together comprising the core Lamiidae. Early branching patterns are less well supported, with Garryales only poorly supported as sister to the above ‘core’ and a weakly supported clade composed of Icacinaceae, Metteniusaceae, and Oncothecaceae sister to all other Lamiidae. • Conclusions: Our phylogeny of Lamiidae reveals increased resolution and support for internal relationships that have remained elusive.
    [Show full text]