ED 093 776 TITLE INSTITUTION SPONS AGENCY REPORT NO PUB DATE AVAILABLE from DOCUMENT RESUME SO 007 634 Selected Bibliography Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
All Victims Matter. Reconciliation of the Balkan Faiths and Peoples: an Assessment of Recent Progress
Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 40 Issue 10 Article 2 12-2020 All Victims Matter. Reconciliation of the Balkan Faiths and Peoples: An Assessment of Recent Progress Vjekoslav Perica University of Rijeka, Croatia Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons Recommended Citation Perica, Vjekoslav (2020) "All Victims Matter. Reconciliation of the Balkan Faiths and Peoples: An Assessment of Recent Progress," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 40 : Iss. 10 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol40/iss10/2 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ALL VICTIMS MATTER RECONCILIATION OF BALKAN FAITHS AND PEOPLES: AN ASSESSMENT OF RECENT PROGRESS By Vjekoslav Perica Vjekoslav Perica is a Croatian-American historian, author of, among other things, Balkan Idols: Religion and Nationalism in Yugoslav States (Oxford University Press, 2002; Belgrade, 2006). His most recent publication is “Serbian Jerusalem: Inventing a Holy Land in Europe’s Periphery, 1982- 2019,” Chapter IX, in Nadim N. Rouhana and Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian, eds. When Politics Are Sacralized: Comparative Perspectives on Religious Claims and Nationalism (Cambridge University Press, 2020). Perica holds a Ph.D. in history from the University of Minnesota Twin Cities, USA. In the 1970s in former Yugoslavia he was a basketball player, and before the war, a jurist and journalist until coming to America in 1991. -
Additional Pleading of the Republic of Croatia
international court of Justice case concerning the application of the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide (croatia v. serBia) ADDITIONAL PLEADING OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA anneXes volume 2 30 august 2012 international court of Justice case concerning the application of the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide (croatia v. serBia) ADDITIONAL PLEADING OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA anneXes volume 2 30 august 2012 ii iii CONTENTS annex 1: supreme martial court, ii K no. 111/92, 7 may 1992, decision 1 annex 2: photo of victims of vukovar, 18 november 1991, in the article by savo ©trbac, ZloËini nad Srbima na prostoru Hrvatske u periodu 1990-1999 [crimes against serbs on the territory of croatia in the period 1990-1999] 5 annex 3: official record of the statement made by a.a., 10 July 2012 6 annex 4: statement of 7 annex 5: statement of 9 annex 6: criminal complaint lodged by the independent associa- tion of Journalists in serbia with the office of the War crimes prosecutor, 1 July 2009 12 annex 7: programme statement of the management Board of radio television serbia, 23 may 2011 14 annex 8: peace initiative of the president of the republic of croatia, dr. franjo tuman, Zagreb, 1 november 1993 16 annex 9: record of the statement of i.B., 20 april 2012 19 annex 10: rsK, ministry of the interior, state security department, doc. no. 08/2-0-1224/95, Knin, 8 June 1995, with excerpt from the Weekly civilian affairs report 30 annex 11: un, coded cable from akashi to Kofi annan, meeting in Knin, 1 august 1995 32 annex 12: request for return to the republic of croatia filed by J.K., october 1995 39 annex 13: request for return to the republic of croatia filed by m.m., January 1996 40 annex 14: request for return to the republic of croatia filed by s.p., January 1996 42 annex 15: request for return to the republic of croatia filed by s.g., february 1996 43 annex 16: request for return to the republic of croatia filed by Æ.J., october 1995 44 annex 17: official note of the statement by d.–. -
Memorial of the Republic of Croatia
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA APPENDICES VOLUME 5 1 MARCH 2001 II III Contents Page Appendix 1 Chronology of Events, 1980-2000 1 Appendix 2 Video Tape Transcript 37 Appendix 3 Hate Speech: The Stimulation of Serbian Discontent and Eventual Incitement to Commit Genocide 45 Appendix 4 Testimonies of the Actors (Books and Memoirs) 73 4.1 Veljko Kadijević: “As I see the disintegration – An Army without a State” 4.2 Stipe Mesić: “How Yugoslavia was Brought Down” 4.3 Borisav Jović: “Last Days of the SFRY (Excerpts from a Diary)” Appendix 5a Serb Paramilitary Groups Active in Croatia (1991-95) 119 5b The “21st Volunteer Commando Task Force” of the “RSK Army” 129 Appendix 6 Prison Camps 141 Appendix 7 Damage to Cultural Monuments on Croatian Territory 163 Appendix 8 Personal Continuity, 1991-2001 363 IV APPENDIX 1 CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS1 ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE CHRONOLOGY BH Bosnia and Herzegovina CSCE Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe CK SKJ Centralni komitet Saveza komunista Jugoslavije (Central Committee of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia) EC European Community EU European Union FRY Federal Republic of Yugoslavia HDZ Hrvatska demokratska zajednica (Croatian Democratic Union) HV Hrvatska vojska (Croatian Army) IMF International Monetary Fund JNA Jugoslavenska narodna armija (Yugoslav People’s Army) NAM Non-Aligned Movement NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation -
Vukovarsko-Srijemska Županija
POVJERENIK ZA INFORMIRANJE ANALITIČKO IZVJEŠĆE O PRAĆENJU PROVEDBE ZAKONA O PRAVU NA PRISTUP INFORMACIJAMA br. 2/2019 Transparentnost i otvorenost u lokalnoj i područnoj (regionalnoj) samoupravi: Vukovarsko-srijemska županija Zagreb, svibanj 2019. Sadržaj 1. Uvod ............................................................................................................................... 2 2. Metodologija praćenja .................................................................................................... 3 3. Rezultati praćenja po točkama ....................................................................................... 6 4. Ukupni rezultati praćenja ...............................................................................................24 5. Preporuke za poboljšanje stanja ....................................................................................26 Povjerenik za informiranje – Analitičko izvješće br. 2 / 2 0 1 9 1 1. Uvod Povjerenik za informiranje kao neovisno tijelo koje štiti, prati i promiče pravo na pristup informacijama i ponovnu uporabu informacija, u okviru funkcije praćenja provedbe Zakona o pravu na pristup informacijama (NN 25/13, 85/15 – Zakon, ZPPI) i u 2019. godini nastavlja s provedbom praćenja usklađenosti postupanja tijela javne vlasti s obvezama proaktivne objave informacija, provedbe savjetovanja s javnošću i osiguravanja javnosti rada od strane jedinica lokalne i (područne) regionalne samouprave (JLP(R)S), s ciljem razvijanja kulture transparentnosti ove specifične skupine tijela javne -
ACFC 2Nd State Report Croatia
April 2004 ACFC/SR/II(2004)002 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY CROATIA PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 13 April 2004) ACFC/SR/II(2004)002 Table of contents: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 6 PART I.............................................................................................................................. 11 From the report of the Ministry of Justice ........................................................................ 11 From the report of the Office for National Minorities of the Government of the Republic of Croatia .......................................................................................................................... 20 From the report of the Commission on Relations with Religious Communities.............. 34 From the report of the Central State Administration Bureau............................................ 38 From the report of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs .......................................................... 38 From the report of the Ministry of Science, Education and Sports .................................. 38 Albanian national minority ............................................................................................... 43 PART II............................................................................................................................. 46 Answers to the Questionnaire of the Advisory -
Serbia and the Serbian Rebellion in Croatia (1990-1991)
Serbia and the Serbian Rebellion in Croatia (1990-1991) By Harry Jack Hayball Thesis submitted to Goldsmiths College, University of London, for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2015 Supervised by Professor Jan Plamper 2 Declaration All the work presented in this thesis is my own. Harry Jack Hayball Declaration 3 Abstract It is often suggested that the Serbian rebellion in Croatia in 1990-91 was orchestrated by Serbia, and, in particular, by its president Slobodan Milošević personally. Despite the popularity of this interpretation, however, the literature on the break-up of Yugoslavia is yet to offer a focused study of Serbia's role in the descent into conflict in Croatia. Many sources that have become available in recent years remain unused. Through a critical and cautious use of such sources, including extensive interviews with participants in the conflict and contemporary documentation, this thesis aims to fill this gap in the literature and to update our knowledge of this important aspect of the bloody disintegration of Yugoslavia. Honing in on Belgrade's relationships with Serb political and military/paramilitary leaders in Croatia, as well as Serbia's direct involvement in and attitude towards the road to war, it concludes that the existing focus on Milošević's Serbia has been misplaced. Serbia's stance towards Croatia was hardline, but Belgrade's influence over the Croatian Serbs was limited and its direct involvement in events minimal. Milošević did not have a grand plan to orchestrate violence in Croatia, and the leaders of the Serbian rebellion in Croatia were fundamentally independent and autonomous actors, who, far from being Milošević's puppets, were often in conflict with him. -
Hailing the Serbian “People”
HAILING THE SERBIAN “PEOPLE”: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CENTRAL ROLE OF THE KOSOVO MYTH IN THE CONSTITUTION OF SERBIAN ETHNO-NATIONAL IDENTITY AND THE NORMALIZATION OF VIOLENCE IN THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA by CHRISTINA M. MORUS (Under the Direction of Kevin DeLuca) ABSTRACT Throughout the fifty years in which Josip Broz Tito was the leader of Yugoslavia, ethnic tensions had been nearly non-existent. Throughout the region, Serbs, Croats and Bosniaks had shared the same schools, places of employment and residences, and had a common language. For the most part, people’s ethnic and religious identities were subordinate to their identity as Yugoslavs. Yet, by the end of the 1980s, ethno-national consciousness became a part of the daily lives of many Yugoslav people. For this to be possible, peoples’ Yugoslav identity had to become tertiary. This project examines the role of rhetoric in discounting the pan-Slavic identity among Serbs and in constituting an exclusive, racialized, and highly politicized Serbian people in its place. I critique the rhetorical strategies of Serbian cultural elites and analyze the public discourse of Slobodan Milosevic with an eye to the ways in which politics and culture worked in conjunction toward a common end. In doing so I posit the effects of constitutive discourses on the polarizing national identities that rapidly replaced the largely unified Yugoslav identity, thereby legitimizing the mass violence that characterized the break-up of the Yugoslav Federation. Through essential discourses of historic victimization, the way in which Serb identity was situated in relation to Yugoslavia and the rest of the world at large was increasingly polarizing. -
Gajeva 7, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia Zagreb, February 22, 2017 Phone: 00385 (0)1 48 11 198 E-Mail: [email protected]
Gajeva 7, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia Zagreb, February 22, 2017 Phone: 00385 (0)1 48 11 198 E-mail: [email protected] Statement of the Novosti journalists and editors: Stop the attack against freedom of speech Novosti's journalists and editors would like to inform the general public, local and international institutions, professional associations and civil society organizations about an ongoing attack against freedom of speech and the rights of ethnic minorities in Croatia started by the ultraconservative nongovernmental organization “In the Name of the Family” (U ime obitelji). On February 13 this organization held a press conference in front of the Croatian Parliament building demanding the closure of the Novosti weekly. On the same day, it sent to the Government, the Parliament, the Council on National Minorities, the Government Audit Office and the State Attorney's Office a document titled “Report on the Abuse of State Budget Funds for the Serbian National Minority”, in which it calls for the criminal prosecution of Novosti's journalists, editors and publishers. During the mentioned press conference as well as in the “Report” a number of unfounded and malicious accusations have been made, the most important being the one that the “Novosti insults the Republic of Croatia and spreads hatred and intolerance towards the majority Croatian people”. In the following days the members of this organization repeatedly made the same accusations in a number of Croatian media outlets. On February 20 they started an online petition for the closure of the Novosti and flooded the e-mail system of the Council on National Minorities with thousands of automatic e-mails. -
Novi Dokumenti O Ratu U Vukovaru 1991. KOSTA NIKOLIĆ Institut Za Savremenu Istoriju, Beograd
IZVORNI ZNANSTVENI RAD udk: 341.34(497.5 Vukovar)“1991“(093) / PRIMLJENO: 19. siječnja 2020. Novi dokumenti o ratu u Vukovaru 1991. KOSTA NIKOLIĆ Institut za savremenu istoriju, Beograd U tekstu se piše o početku ratnih operacija u Vukovaru i razlozima za napad Jugoslovenske narodne armije na grad. Analizira se postratna situacija u Vukovaru, problem zarobljenih i nestalih lica i događaji vezani za zločin na Ovčari. Naučna literatura, posebno u Hrvatskoj, o ovim događajima veoma je obimna. U ovom radu ona nije šire eksplicirana jer je akcenat stavljen na do sada retko korišćenu izvornu građu prvog reda. Ona je široj javnosti postala dostupna nakon što je uvrštena u sudske spise “Međunarodnog tribunala za krivično gonjenje lica odgovornih za teška kršenja međunarodnog humanitarnog prava na teritoriji bivše Jugoslavije posle 1991” (International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991). Dokumenta se nalaze na javnoj bazi Tribuna- la u Hagu.1 KLJUČNE RIJEČI: Vukovar, Hrvatska, Jugoslovenska narodna armija, rat, zaroblje- nici. Vukovar – kako je počelo? Slično kao i u ostalim kriznim krajevima u Hrvatskoj, i situacija u Vukovaru2 išla je od loše ka goroj, da bi na kraju došlo do razornog ratnog sukoba. Glavni politički faktor Srba sa područja Slavonije bilo je Srpsko nacionalno vijeće za Slavoniju, Baranju i Zapadni Srem. Ono je osnovano 7. januara 1991. u Šidskim Banovcima. Vijeće je 26. februara 1991. usvojilo “Deklaraciju o suvere- 1 Ujedinjene nacije. Sudski spisi Međunarodnog krivičnog tribunala za bivšu Jugoslaviju, (Uni- ted Nations ICTY Court Records), http://icr. -
Press Freedom in Croatia: Hate Speech and Hope for Change Report on the January 2018 Joint International Mission (JIM)
Press freedom in Croatia: Hate speech and Hope for change Report on the January 2018 Joint International Mission (JIM) May 2018 Press freedom in Croatia: Hate speech and Hope for change Report on the January 2018 Joint International Mission (JIM) May 2018 Report by South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO) Participating Organisations: Association of European Journalists (AEJ) European Broadcasting Union (EBU) European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) Reporters Without Borders (RSF) South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO) Mission Observer: Croatian Journalists' Association – CJA (Hrvatsko novinarsko društvo - HND), local partner of EFJ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Press freedom in Croatia: Hate speech and Hope for change -Report on the January 2018 Joint International Mission (JIM) ABOUT THIS REPORT This report summarises the findings of a two-day Joint International Mission (JIM), 15-16 January 2018, to Croatia led by the South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO) and including representatives from the Association of European Journalists (AEJ), European Broadcasting Union (EBU), the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ), the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) and the Reporters Without Borders (RSF). The preparation and the swift implementation of this visit were supported by the Croatian Journalists' Association – CJA (Hrvatsko novinarsko društvo - HND), local partner of EFJ, that held -
Godišnji Plan I Program Osnovne Škole Bršadin
GODIŠNJI PLAN I PROGRAM RADA OSNOVNE ŠKOLE BRŠADIN Šk. godina 2017./18. GODIŠNJI PLAN I PROGRAM OSNOVNE ŠKOLE BRŠADIN OSNOVNI PODACI O OSNOVNOJ ŠKOLI BRŠADIN ( osobna karta škole ) Osnovna škola: Bršadin Broj i naziv pošte:32222 Bršadin Broj telefona: 032/569431 Broj telefaksa: 032/569802 e-mail: ured Broj učenika : I - IV razreda: 43 Ukupno: 83 Broj razrednih odjela I - IV: 5, Ukupno : 9 Broj djelatnika : a) učitelja razredne nastave: 5 b) učitelja predmetne nastave: 18 c) stručnih suradnika : 2 d) ostalih djelatnika: 5 Ravnatelj škole: Tatjana Lukić, prof. Na osnovi Članka 28. Zakona o osnovnoj i srednjoj školi i Statuta Osnovne škole, Školski odbor na sjednici održanoj 18. rujna 2017., a na prijedlog Učiteljskog vijeća i mišljenja Vijeća roditelja donosi: GODIŠNJI PLAN I PROGRAM ZA 2017./18. ŠKOLSKU GODINU. 2 GODIŠNJI PLAN I PROGRAM OSNOVNE ŠKOLE BRŠADIN SADRŽAJ Osnovni podaci o školi 1. Podaci o uvjetima rada 1.1. Podaci o upisnom području 1.2. Unutrašnji školski prostor 1.3. Školski okoliš i plan uređenja 1.4. Nastavna sredstva 1.4.1. Knjižni fond škole 1.5. Plan obnove i adaptacije 1.5.1. Plan dogradnje izgradnje i izgradnje sportske dvorane 2. Podaci o izvršiteljima poslova i njihovim radnim zaduženjima 2.1. Podaci o odgojno – obrazovnim radnicima 2.1.1. Podaci o učiteljima razredne nastave 2.1.2. Podaci o učiteljima predmetne nastave 2.1.3. Podaci o ravnatelju i stručnim suradnicima 2.1.4. Podaci o odgojno – obrazovnim radnicima – pripravnicima 2.1.5. Pomoćnik u nastavi 2.2. Podaci o ostalim radnicima 2.3. Tjedna i godišnja zaduženja odgojno – obrazovnih radnika škole 2.3.1. -
Sixth Periodical Report Presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in Accordance with Article 15 of the Charter
Strasbourg, 26 July 2019 MIN-LANG (2019) PR 6 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Sixth periodical report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter CROATIA GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA SIXTH REPORT BY THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA ON THE APPLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES ZAGREB, June 2019 SADRŽAJ 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 2 2. PART I ............................................................................................................................... 3 2.1. Legislation .................................................................................................................. 3 2.2. Action Plan for the Implementation of the Constitutional Act on the Rights of National Minorities for the Period 2011 – 2013 .................................................................... 4 2.3. Implementation of the Recommendations of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (RecChL(2015)2) ................................................................................... 20 2.4. 2011 Census in Croatia ............................................................................................ 21 3. PART II– Objectives and principles ................................................................................ 23 3.1. Article 7, paragraph (1) ...........................................................................................