DOCSLIB.ORG

Jersey City Redevelopment Agency in the County of Hudson, New Jersey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jersey City Redevelopment Agency in the County of Hudson, New Jersey NEW ISSUE – BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATING: SP-1+ In the opinion of McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC, Bond Counsel, assuming compliance by the Agency (as defined herein) with certain tax covenants described herein, under existing law, interest on the Project Note (as defined herein) is excluded from gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and interest on the Project Note is not an item of tax preference under Section 57 of the Code for purposes of computing alternative minimum tax; however, interest paid to certain corporate holders of the Project Note indirectly may be subject to alternative minimum tax under circumstances described under “TAX MATTERS” herein. Based upon existing law, interest on the Project Note and any gain on the sale thereof are not included in gross income under the New Jersey Gross Income Tax Act. See “TAX MATTERS” herein. JERSEY CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, NEW JERSEY $10,000,000 PROJECT NOTE (Series 2018) (Pathside Redevelopment Project) (City Guaranteed) (Tax-Exempt)(Non-callable) Interest Rate: 3.00% Reoffering Yield: 1.92% CUSIP: 476637AA1 Dated: Date of Delivery Maturity: May 30, 2019 The $10,000,000 Project Note (Series 2018) (Pathside Redevelopment Project) (City Guaranteed)(Tax-Exempt) (the “Project Note”) of the Jersey City Redevelopment Agency, in the County of Hudson, New Jersey (the “Agency”) will be issued in the form of one certificate for the aggregate principal amount of the Project Note issued and, when issued, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (“DTC”), which will act as securities depository. See “DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT NOTE – Book-Entry Only System” herein. U.S. Bank National Association, Morristown, New Jersey, will act as trustee, paying agent and bond registrar (the “Trustee”, “Paying Agent” and “Bond Registrar”) for the Project Note. The principal of and interest on the Project Note will be paid on the respective maturity dates to DTC by the Paying Agent Interest on the Project Note will be credited to the participants of DTC as listed on the records as of the close of business on May 29, 2019 (the “Record Date”). Interest on the Project Note will be computed on the basis of a three hundred sixty (360) day year consisting of twelve (12) months of thirty (30) days each. See “DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT NOTE – Book-Entry Only System” herein. The Project Note is not subject to redemption prior to its stated maturity. The Project Note is being issued pursuant to: (i) provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of New Jersey (the “State”), including the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law, constituting Chapter 79 of the Pamphlet Laws of 1992 of the State, and acts amendatory thereof and supplemental thereto (the “Redevelopment Law”), (ii) a resolution of the Agency adopted on November 21, 2017, entitled “Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of the Jersey City Redevelopment Agency Authorizing the Issuance Of Revenue Bonds, Series 2017 (Tax-Exempt) (Pathside Redevelopment Project) (City Guaranteed), for the Acquisition Of Block 9501, Lot 22 (25 Pathside), the Execution of a Trust Indenture to Secure the Bonds, and Determining Other Matters Related Thereto”, as amended and supplemented, including by a Certificate of the Executive Director of the Agency dated the date of sale of the Project Note (collectively, the “Resolution”), and (iii) a Trust Indenture dated as of May 1, 2018 by and between the Agency and the Trustee (the “Indenture”). The Project Note is being issued to provide funds to (i) finance the acquisition and improvement of an approximately 58,000 square foot building in the City of Jersey City (the “City”); (ii) pay costs and expenses associated with the issuance of the Project Note; and (iii) pay capitalized interest thereon (collectively, the “Project”). See “PURPOSES OF THE PROJECT NOTE” herein. The Project Note is a special, limited obligation of the Agency, secured by a pledge by the Agency of certain funds and accounts, including Revenues (as defined herein) of the Agency. Such pledge, however, is subordinate in all respects to any and all bonds that may be issued by the Agency pursuant to the Indenture. The Agency currently has no outstanding bonds issued pursuant to the Indenture. The Project Note is also entitled to the benefits of a Subsidy Agreement dated as of April 1, 2018 (the “Subsidy Agreement”) by and between the Agency and the City. Pursuant to the Subsidy Agreement, the City is obligated to make any required payments to the Agency out of the first funds becoming legally available to the City and to provide the funds for such payments to the Agency, if not otherwise available, from the levy of ad valorem taxes upon all the taxable real property in the City without limitation as to rate or amount. See “SECURITY AND SOURCE OF PAYMENT FOR THE PROJECT NOTE” herein. THE AGENCY HAS NO POWER TO LEVY OR COLLECT TAXES, AND THE PROJECT NOTE SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO CREATE A DEBT OR LIABILITY OF THE STATE OR OF ANY COUNTY OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE, OTHER THAN THE AGENCY (EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT OF THE OBLIGATION OF THE CITY TO MAKE PAYMENTS UNDER THE SUBSIDY AGREEMENT) AND DOES NOT AND SHALL NOT CREATE OR CONSTITUTE ANY INDEBTEDNESS, LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION OF THE STATE, OR OF ANY COUNTY OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE, OTHER THAN THE AGENCY (EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT OF THE OBLIGATION OF THE CITY TO MAKE PAYMENTS UNDER THE SUBSIDY AGREEMENT), EITHER LEGAL, MORAL OR OTHERWISE. The Project Note is offered for delivery when, as and if issued and delivered by the Agency, and received by the Underwriter (as defined herein), subject to the approving legal opinion of McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC, Roseland, New Jersey, Bond Counsel to the Agency. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Agency by its General Counsel, McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC, Roseland, New Jersey and for the City by its Corporation Counsel and by its Bond Counsel, Archer, Red Bank, New Jersey. The Project Note in definitive form is expected to be available for delivery through DTC on or about May 31, 2018. Dated: May 10, 2018 JERSEY CITYREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMBERS AND PROFESSIONALS ACTING EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Diana H. Jeffrey, Esq. MEMBERS Rolando R. Lavarro, Jr. Chairman Evelyn Farmer Vice Chairman Donald R. Brown Commissioner Douglas Carlucci Commissioner Erma D. Greene Commissioner Darwin R. Ona Commissioner Daniel Rivera Commissioner AGENCY GENERAL COUNSEL McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC Roseland, New Jersey AGENCY BOND COUNSEL McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC Roseland, New Jersey AGENCY AUDITOR Ferraioli, Wielkotz, Cerullo &Cuva, P.A. Pompton Lakes, New Jersey AGENCY FINANCIAL ADVISOR NW Financial Group, LLC Hoboken, New Jersey CITY OF JERSEY CITY COUNTY OF HUDSON CITY HALL, 280 GROVE STREET JERSEY CITY, NEW JERSEY 07302 (201) 5471-5200 MAYOR Steven M. Fulop CITY COUNCIL Rolando R. Lavarro, Jr., Council President Joyce E. Watterman, Councilwoman at Large Daniel Rivera, Councilman at Large Denise Ridley, Ward A Councilwoman Mira Prinz-Arey, Ward B Councilwoman Richard Boggiano, Ward C Councilman Michael Yun, Ward D Councilman James Solomon, Ward E Councilman Jermaine D. Robinson, Ward F Councilman CITY OFFICIALS Brian Platt, Business Administrator Mark Albiez, Mayor’s Chief of Staff Peter Baker, Corporation Counsel Marcos D. Vigil, Director of the Department of Housing, Economic Development and Commerce Donna L. Mauer, Chief Financial Officer Robert Byrne, City Clerk BOND COUNSEL Archer Red Bank, New Jersey INDEPENDENT AUDITOR Donohue, Gironda, Doria & Tomkins, LLC Bayonne, New Jersey No dealer, broker, salesperson or other person has been authorized by the Agency or the Underwriters to give any information or to make any representations with respect to the Project Note other than those contained in this Official Statement and if given or made, such information or representation must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the foregoing. The information contained herein has been provided by the Agency and other sources deemed reliable; however, no representation or warranty is made as to its accuracy or completeness and such information is not to be construed as a representation or warranty by the Agency or the Underwriters as to information from sources other than itself. The information and the expressions of opinion herein are subject to change without notice, and neither the delivery of this Official Statement nor any sale hereunder under any circumstances shall create any implication that there has been no change in any of the information herein since the date hereof or since the date as of which such information is given, if earlier. The Agency has not confirmed the accuracy or completeness of information relating to The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) which information has been provided by DTC. References in this Official Statement to laws, rules, regulations, resolutions, agreements, reports and documents do not purport to be comprehensive or definitive. All references to such documents are qualified in their entirety by reference to the particular document, the full text of which may contain qualifications of and exceptions to statements made herein and copies of which may be inspected at the Agency during normal business hours. This Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of the Project Note in any jurisdiction in which it is unlawful for any person to make such an offer, solicitation or sale. No dealer, broker, salesperson or other person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations other than as contained in this Official Statement.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Consenting to the Issuance of Refunding Bonds by the JCMUA, and Authorizing Other Actions in Connection Therewith
    Resolution of the City of Jersey City, N.J. File No. Res. 19-938 Agenda No. 10.12 Approved: Dec 18 2019 OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY RESOLUTIONCONSENTING TO THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS BY THE JERSEY CITY MUNICIPALREFUNDING UTILITIES AUTHORITY, AND AUTHORIZING OTHER ACTIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH COUNCIL offered and moved adoption of the following resolution: WHEREAS, on January 28, 1998, the Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority (the “Authority”), a public body corporate and politic of the State of New Jersey organized pursuant to the Municipal and County Utilities Authorities Law (N.J.S.A. 40:14B-1 et. seq.) (the “Act”), adopted a resolution entitled, “Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of Revenue Bonds of the Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority”, as previously amended and supplemented from time to time (the “General Bond Resolution”); and WHEREAS, pursuant the General Bond Resolution, a Supplemental Water Bond Resolution and a Supplemental Sewer Bond Resolution, each adopted September 22, 2011, the Authority issued $61,765,000 principal amount of Revenue Bonds, Series 2011, on October 28, 2011 (the “2011 Bonds”); and WHEREAS, the Authority desires to refund, on an advance refunding basis, all or a portion of the $22,830,000 outstanding principal amount of the callable 2011 Bonds, maturing on or after October 15, 2022, through the issuance of refunding bonds (the “Authority Refunding Bonds”); and WHEREAS, in accordance with current market conditions, the Authority Refunding Bonds are estimated to produce a net present value savings of approximately $1,200,000 over the term; and WHEREAS, the City of Jersey City (the “City”) and the Authority have entered into (i) a Service Contract with respect to the Sewer System on December 1, 1985, as amended by Amendment No.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX A. Supplementary Tables
    APPENDIX A. Supplementary Tables Jersey City - Environmental Resource Inventory A-1 Soil Types Table A.1. Soil Types Legend Soil classification reflects the parent material that forms the soil, the soil family, and the slope of the landform. The following information will assist in the interpretation of the Soil Classification table. Capability Class Definition 1 Slight limitations that restrict their use. 2 Moderate limitations that restrict the choice of plants or that require moderate conservation practices 3 Very severe limitations that restrict the choice of plants or that require very careful management, or both. 8 Limitations that preclude commercial plant production and that restrict their use to recreational purposes, wildlife habitat, watershed, or esthetic purposes. In this Table, there are three types of Green Belt soil, each with a different slope range. Slopes are measured in degrees or as a percent; a 450 slope = 100% slope. Each Soil Name is associated with a unique Code. Land Capability Classes reflect the potential for agricultural uses; the higher the class number, the more restricted the potential uses are. The letter that follows the numeric code indicates the reason for restricted uses. For example, Green Belt Loam, 8 to 15 percent slope, is restricted because of the likelihood of erosion. Capability Subclass Definition e The main hazard is the risk of erosion unless close growing plant cover is maintained w Water in or on the soil interferes with plant growth or cultivation (in some soils the wetness can be partly corrected by artificial drainage) s Soil is limited mainly because it is shallow, droughty, or stony Available Water Capacity (AWC) indicates the amount of water available to plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Jersey City's Park System World Class
    MAKING JERSEY CITY’S PARK SYSTEM WORLD CLASS Jersey City has a very good park system, but it could be elite and truly world class. To take the next step up to that elite class will require boldness, creativity, and investment. By renovating existing parks, following through with the new parks that are in various stages of planning or development, completing the Hackensack and Hudson River walkways, and taking the audacious initiative to connect our waterfronts by a series of greenways will enrich the lives of our citizens and make Jersey City’s park system worthy of global attention. A Public Private Partnership for Nonstop Renovation Jersey City began the process of creating a parks master plan to rate the condition and then to renovate Jersey City’s 67 municipal parks a little over a decade ago. In 2008, after numerous public meetings and robust public input, a 10 year detailed plan to improve Jersey City’s park system was put in place that detailed every upgrade that every park needed and estimated the costs of these upgrades. Over the next several years, serious progress was seen. Ercel Webb Park in Ward F, Muhammad Ali and Bayview parks in Ward A, Hamilton Park in Ward E and Ward B’s Boyd McGuiness Park were all substantially improved under the plan. However, the City simply abandoned the plan shortly after Mayor Fulop took office, as he focused his attention, the City’s resources and public relations on just a couple of park improvements. Consequently, parks such as Pershing Field in the Heights have been left to deteriorate and plans to improve it have been shelved.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson County Open Space Advisory Board Recommendations Report
    2009 Hudson County Open Space Advisory Board Recommendations Report Hoboken411.com Open Space, Recreation & Historic Preservation Trust Fund Thomas A. DeGise County Executive Hoboken411.com 2 Hudson County Open Space, Recreation & Historic Preservation Trust COUNTY EXECUTIVE A MESSAGE FROM THE OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD Thomas A. DeGise BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS Dear Friends: Doreen DiDomenico, Chair First District It’s been almost five years since the inception of Hudson County’s first Tilo Rivas, Vice Chair Open Space, Recreation, and Historic Preservation Trust fund. On be‐ Sixth District William O’Dea, Chair Pro Tempore half of the Open Space Advisory Board, we are happy to report that to Second District date, over $26 million in funding has been approved for local govern‐ Albert Cifelli Ninth District ment agencies and non‐profit organizations working to preserve open Jeffrey Dublin space, rehabilitate recreational facilities, and restore historic and cul‐ Third District tural resources. Thomas Liggio Eighth District The preservation of open space along the Hudson, Hackensack, and Jose Muñoz Seventh District Passaic Rivers was achieved ensuring that public access to the water‐ Eliu Rivera front remained a high priority in Hudson County. Countywide athletic Fourth District Anthony Romano facilities were improved with the installation of synthetic turf at sev‐ Fifth District eral parks. The children of Hudson County are now enjoying rehabili‐ OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD tated playgrounds and a new swimming pool facilities. Hudson County Joseph Liccardo, Chair Business Community has also been supportive of efforts to preserve our rich culture and Henry Sanchez, Vice Chair history with funding the restoration of landmark buildings, monu‐ Historic Preservation ments, and museums.
    [Show full text]
  • Morris Canal Redevelopment Plan
    Morris Canal Redevelopment Plan (formerly known as the Garfield - Lafayette Redevelopment Plan) As adopted by the Municipal Council of the City of Jersey City March 1999 Amended February 27, 2002 Amended March 27, 2002 Amended July 26, 2002 Amended November 13, 2002 Amended August 11, 2004 Amended January 11, 2006 Amended October 16, 2006 Amended March 14, 2007 Amended May 28, 2008 – Ord. 08-060 Amended June 25, 2008 – Ord 08-084 Amended December 17, 2008 – Ord 08-169 Amended January 28, 2009 – Ord 09-006 Amended June 17, 2009 –Ord 09-071 Amended May 12, 2010 – Ord 10-064 Amended August 25, 2010 – Ord 10-104 Amended September 29, 2010 – Ord 10-115 Amended November 23, 2010 – Ord 10-156 Amended February 23, 2011 - Ord 11-024 Amended June 29, 2011 – Ord. 11-071 Amended June 27, 2012 – Ord. 12-083 Amended October 9, 2013 – Ord. 13-103 Amended March 12, 2014 – Ord. 14-024 Amended July 16, 2014 – Ord. 14-076 i DIVISION OF CITY PLANNING TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 Background 1 Community Outreach 2 I. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION 4 II. REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GOALS 4 III. PARKS AND GREENSPACE OBJECTIVES 5 IV. GENERAL TRAFFIC CIRCULATION AND PARKING OBJECTIVES: 5 V. STRATEGIC PLAN 10 VI. COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT 11 VII. TYPES OF PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT ACTIONS 12 VIII. GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS 14 IX. GENERAL DESIGN AND LAND USE STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS 16 X. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS 18 XI. LAND USE ZONES AND SPECIFIC LAND USE PROVISIONS 20 A. TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT ZONES 20 B. COMMUTER PARKING 30 C.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Jersey City New Jersey Audit of Financial
    CITY OF JERSEY CITY NEW JERSEY AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FEDERAL AND STATE GRANT PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND THE TRANSITION YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 WITH REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS AND LETTERS OF COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CITY OF JERSEY CITY AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS DECEMBER 31, 2011 PAGE EXHIBIT TABLE SCHEDULE FINANCIAL SECTION Report of Independent Auditors 1 - 3 Current Fund Comparative Balance Sheet - Regulatory Basis 4 - 5 A Comparative Statement of Operations and Changes in Fund Balance - Regulatory Basis 6 - 7 A-1 Statement of Revenues - Regulatory Basis 8 - 10 A-2 Statement of Revenues - Analysis of Budget Revenues - Regulatory Basis 11 A-2a Statement of Revenues - Analysis of Non-Budget Revenues - Regulatory Basis 12 - 13 A-2b Statement of Appropriations - Regulatory Basis 14 - 25 A-3 Trust Funds Comparative Balance Sheet - Regulatory Basis 26 - 29 B General Capital Fund Comparative Balance Sheet - Regulatory Basis 30 C Statement of Fund Balance - Regulatory Basis 31 C-1 General Fixed Assets Comparative Balance Sheet - Regulatory Basis 32 D Notes to Financial Statements 33 - 92 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA SECTION Current Fund Schedule of: Cash - Treasurer 93 - 94 A-4 Petty Cash 95 A-5 Change Fund 96 A-6 Taxes Receivable and Analysis of Property Tax Levy 97 A-7 Due from State of New Jersey for Senior Citizens' and Veterans' Deductions 98 A-8 Tax Title Liens Receivable 99 A-9 Property Acquired for Taxes at Assessed Valuation 99 A-10 Revenue Accounts Receivable 100 - 101 A-11
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX A: Final Section 4(F) Evaluation Final Section 4(F) Evaluation
    NJ TRANSITGRID TRACTION POWER SYSTEM FEIS APPENDIX A: Final Section 4(f) Evaluation Final Section 4(f) Evaluation A.1 INTRODUCTION This Final Section 4(f) Evaluation has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation (USDOT) Act of 1966. Based on the Section 4(f) Evaluation, Federal Transit Administration (FTA) determined that the proposed Project would result in the use of the Old Main Delaware, Lackawanna and Western (DL&W) Railroad Historic District, which is a Section 4(f) property. This chapter discusses the identification of Section 4(f) properties within the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the proposed Project, describes the effect of the proposed Project on those properties, and summarizes measures to minimize harm included as part of the proposed Project. A.2 REGULATORY CONTEXT AND METHODOLOGY Section 4(f) of the USDOT Act of 1966, as amended (23 C.F.R. Part § 774-codified in 49 U.S.C. 303 and generally referred to as “Section 4(f))” prohibits the Secretary of Transportation from approving any program or project that requires the “use” of: (1) any publicly-owned parkland, recreation area, or wildlife/waterfowl refuge of national, state, or local significance; or (2) any land from a historic site of national, state, or local significance (collectively, “Section 4(f) properties”), unless there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of such land and such program and the project includes all possible planning to minimize harm to the park, recreation area, wildlife/waterfowl refuge, or historic site.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Cover
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page Executive Summary i Overview of the Master Planning Process 1 Physical Assessment of the Parks 2 Public Outreach 3 Open Space and Recreation Lands Needs Analysis 4 Recommendations to Increase Open Space 8 Parks and Open Space Map 10 Recreation Facilities Needs Assessment 11 Recommendations to Increase Park Facilities 19 Summary of Existing Park Facilities Ward A - F 23 Improvement Recommendations for Existing Individual Parks 29 1. 16th Street Park 30 2. Alexander F. Santora Park 31 3. Angel Ramos Park 32 4. Apple Tree House 33 5. Arlington Park (William Thorton Park) 34 6. Arthur Ashe Park 35 7. Audubon Park (Major John Desmond Park) 36 8. Bayside Park 38 9. Boyd - McGuiness Park 39 10. Brett Triangle Park 40 11. City Hall Park 41 12. Columbia Park (Greenville Memorial) 42 13. Cornelius Parker Park 43 14. Dr. Edith Bland Phillips Park 45 15. Dr. Lena Edwards Park 46 16. Dr. Rizal Park 47 17. Edward Crincoli Park 48 TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page 18. Fairmont Triangle Park 49 19. Ferris Triangle Park 50 20. First Street Park 51 21. Fitzgerald-Holota Park 53 22. Fulton Avenue Park 54 23. Gateway Park Complex 56 24. Hackensack River Greenway Park 58 25. Hamilton Park 60 26. Harmon Street Pool 62 27. Isetta McDuffy Park 64 28. J. Owen Grundy Park 65 29. Janet Moore Park 66 30. LaPointe Park 67 31. Laurel Court Park 68 32. Leonard Gordon Park 69 33. Lincoln Park West 71 34. Lt. R.B. Grover Memorial Park 73 35. Martiniak-Enright Park 74 36.
    [Show full text]
  • November 16, 2017 United States Environmental Protection Agency Attn
    November 16, 2017 United States Environmental Protection Agency Attn: Ms. Lya Theodoratos 290 Broadway 18th Floor New York, NY 10007 Re: Jersey City Redevelopment Agency EPA Brownfields Site-Specific Cleanup Grant Application Mill Creek, Block 15801 Lot 77 Dear Ms. Theodoratos: Enclosed please find an application for an EPA Brownfields Site-Specific Cleanup Grant for the above-referenced site for the City of Jersey City. Pertinent applicant information follows: a. Applicant: City of Jersey City 280 Grove Street Jersey City, New Jersey 07302 b. Funding Requested: i) Grant Type - Cleanup ii) Federal Funds Requested - $200,000 iii) Contamination - Hazardous Substances c. Location: The City of Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey d. Property Information: Mill Creek, Block 15801 Lot 77 Jersey Ave Ins. Jersey City, New Jersey 07302 e. Contacts: i) Project Director: Mr. Benjamin Delisle, Director of Development Jersey City Redevelopment Agency 66 York Street, 2nd Floor Jersey City, New Jersey 07302-3839 Email: [email protected] Phone: (201) 761-0822 Fax: (201) 761-0831 ii) Chief Executive: Mayor Steven Fulop 280 Grove St, Jersey City, NJ 07302 Phone: (201) 547-5200 Fax: (201) 547-4288/5442 f. Population: i) Population of the City of Jersey City: 259,651 (2011-2015 American Community Survey) ii) Population of jurisdiction targeted by this grant: 259,651 (2011- 2015 American Community Survey) iii) Statement regarding persistent poverty: Hudson County is not a county experiencing “persistent poverty.” g. Other Factors Checklist Please see attached. I am excited about the opportunity that this funding will provide to the citizens of the City of Jersey City and look forward to a favorable response.
    [Show full text]
  • Jersey City Planning Board Public Notice Regular Meeting
    JERSEY CITY PLANNING BOARD PUBLIC NOTICE REGULAR MEETING Please take notice the Planning Board took the following action at the Regular Meeting of January 6, 2015 1. Call to Order 2. Sunshine Announcement 3. Roll Call 4. Swear in Staff 5. Correspondence: 6. Old Business: The following case has been dismissed a per Section 345-22(G) and Section 23(G) of the Land Development Ordinance, applications inactive for 6 months are subject to dismissal by the Division of City Planning: P13-073 – 409-411 Fairmount Avenue – Minor Subdivision 7. New Business: THE ORDER OF ITEMS ON THE AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE. 8. Review and discussion of a Master Plan Reexamination Report. Some testimony taken. Continued to February 3, 2015 Planning Board meeting. 9. Review and discussion of Amendments to the Jersey City Master Plan regarding the Historic Preservation Element. Some testimony taken. Continued to February 3, 2015 Planning Board meeting 10. Case: P14-063 Minor Subdivision Applicant: Fields Development Group Co. Attorney: James McCann, Esq. Review Planner: Matt Ward, AICP Address: 193 & 201 Van Vorst Street Block: 14205 Lot: 14 & 17 Zone: Tidewater Basin Redevelopment Plan & Liberty Harbor North Redevelopment Plan Description: Minor Subdivision of two lots into three lots. Existing Buildings to be demolished. Deviation: Two principal structures on one lot. Decision: Approved. 11. Case: P14-059 Minor Site Plan Applicant: Public Storage Attorney: George Garcia Review Planner: Jeff Wenger Address: 124-142 First Street Block: 11503 Lot: 1 Zone: Powerhouse Arts District Redevelopment Plan Description: Temporary Signage To be carried to an unspecified date. 12. Case: P14-069 Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan Applicant: New Gold Equity Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • JERSEY CITY, NJ Top Reasons Why Jersey City Should Be Amazon’S Hq2
    JERSEY CITY, NJ top reasons why jersey city should be amazon’s hq2 Jersey City is the perfect location for Amazon’s new HQ2 facility for 6 key reasons: u Amazon’s insertion into the New York City skyline with available Hudson River waterfront property at a fraction of New York City costs u Over 1 million square feet of move-in ready space along with over 20 million square feet of additional approved development u Up to $5 billion in economic incentives, up to 30 years of property tax abatement, and no city income tax u Unmatched access and connectivity to New York City, New Jersey, the region, and the world u Walking distance from PATH train, light rail, ferries, buses, and bike share u Direct connections to New York City Subway and mass transit u Newark Airport (15 minutes), JFK airport (1 hour), and LaGuardia Airport (1 hour) provide non-stop flights to all major cities across the country and around the world u Convenient 7 minute ferry ride to Amazon offices in Hudson Yards u Highest level of cell and fiber coverage from all major provid- ers already supporting several global financial institutions u A safe, welcoming, exciting, and thriving community providing a higher quality of life than any other area in the region u The most culturally diverse and accepting city in the country 4 minutes 15 TO NYC 7 minutes minutes why jersey city? why jersey TO HUDSON TO EWR YARDS 022 10+ MILES OF COASTLINE SOURCE: Jersey Digs TABLE OF INCENTIVES 10 AND SUPPORT CONTENTS TRANSPORTATION 12 AND ACCESS SITE COMMUNITY AND 06OVERVIEW 16 QUALITY OF LIFE table of contents table 044 22 ECONOMY 32 RECREATION MUSEUMS, 24 EDUCATION 34 ART, CULTURE PUBLIC 28HOUSING 36 SAFETY SITE OVERVIEW Two prime locations along the Hudson River in downtown Jersey City meet and exceed all requirements for Amazon’s HQ2 location.
    [Show full text]
  • RONALD J. RICCIO March 5, 2020 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS AND
    RONALD J. RICCIO c/o McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter SITE ADMINISTRATOR One Hovchild Plaza 4000 Route #66, 4th Floor Tinton Falls, New Jersey 07753 Direct Dial: 201-874-4581 Tel. 732-733-6200 Email: [email protected] Fax 732-922-2702 March 5, 2020 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS AND EMAIL The Honorable Jeffrey R. Jablonski, P.J. Ch. Superior Court of New Jersey Brennan Courthouse 583 Newark Avenue Jersey City, New Jersey 07306 Re: PROGRESS REPORT (August 1, 2019 through the date of this Report): New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al. v. Honeywell International, Inc., et al. v. City of Jersey City, et al., Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Hudson County, Civil Action No. HUD-C-77-05; Partial Consent Judgment Concerning the PPG Sites filed June 26, 2009 (the “JCO”) Dear Judge Jablonski: I respectfully submit this Progress Report pursuant to my responsibilities as independent Site Administrator operating under the JCO. This Report covers the period August 1, 2019 through the date of this Report. I submit this Progress Report pursuant to paragraph 1(b)(i)1 of the “Order Administratively Dismissing This Matter Without Prejudice and Retaining Jurisdiction” entered by Judge Sarkisian on May 4, 2016. That Order requires that I provide Progress Reports to the Court twice per year. This is my eighth Progress Report. The prior Progress Reports are dated July 29, 2016, January 27, 2017, July 28, 2017, January 30, 2018, July 31, 2018, January 24, 2019 and July 31, 2019. In addition to serving as Site Administrator, I am also a Court-appointed Mediator pursuant to the February 22, 2016 “Order Referring Third-Party Complaint and Referring Certain Matters to Mediation and Entering Stay” (the “Mediation Order”).
    [Show full text]