DOCSLIB.ORG

Hazard Mitigation Plan Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Resolution of the City of Jersey City, N.J. File No. Res. 20-616 Agenda No. 10.11 Approved: Sep 10 2020 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY AUTHORIZING THE ADOPTION OF THE 2020 HUDSON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE COUNCIL offered and moved adoption of the following resolution: Whereas, all jurisdictions within Hudson County have exposure to hazards that increase the risk to life, property, environment, and the County and local economy; and Whereas, pro-active mitigation of known hazards before a disaster event can reduce or eliminate long-term risk to life and property; and Whereas, the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-390) established new requirements for pre and post disaster hazard mitigation programs; and Whereas, a coalition of Hudson County jurisdictions with like planning objectives has been formed to pool resources and create consistent mitigation strategies within Hudson County; and Whereas, the coalition has completed a planning process that engages the public, assesses the risk and vulnerability to the impacts of natural hazards, develops a mitigation strategy consistent with a set of uniform goals and objectives, and creates a plan for implementing, evaluating and revising this strategy; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City of Jersey City ("Jersey City") adopts in its entirety, the 2020 Hudson County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update (the “Plan”) as the jurisdiction’s Hazard Mitigation Plan and resolves to execute the actions identified in the Plan that pertain to this jurisdiction. 2. Jersey City will use the adopted and approved portions of the Plan to guide pre- and post-disaster mitigation of the hazards identified. 3. Jersey City will coordinate the strategies identified in the Plan with other planning programs and mechanisms under its jurisdictional authority. 4. Jersey City will continue its support of the Mitigation Planning Committee as described within the Plan. 5. Jersey City will help to promote and support the mitigation successes of all participants in this Plan. 6. Jersey City will incorporate mitigation planning as an integral component of government and partner operations. 7. Jersey City will provide an update of the Plan in conjunction with the County no less than every five years. Res. 20-616 Approved: September 10 2020 Resolution of the City Council of the City of Jersey City Authorizing the Adoption of the 2020 Hudson County, New Jersey Hazard Mitigation Plan Update APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Business Administrator Corporation Counsel ☐ Certification Required RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE – Sep 10 8-0 AYE NAY N.V. Absent AYE NAY N.V. Absent AYE NAY N.V. Absent N.V. – RIDLEY ✓ SALEH ✓ LAVARRO ✓ (Abstain) PRINZ-AREY ✓ SOLOMON ✓ RIVERA ✓ BOGGIANO ✓ ROBINSON ✓ WATTERMAN, ✓ PRES Adopted at a meeting of the Municipal Council of the City of Jersey. Joyce E. Watterman, President of Council Sean Gallagher, City Clerk Page 2 of 76 Res. 20-616 Approved: September 10 2020 Resolution of the City Council of the City of Jersey City Authorizing the Adoption of the 2020 Hudson County, New Jersey Hazard Mitigation Plan Update RESOLUTION FACT SHEET - This summary sheet is to be attached to the front of any resolution that is submitted for Council consideration. Incomplete or vague fact sheets will be returned with the resolution. Project Manager Lindsey Sigmund, Environmental Planner 2015475010 [email protected] Division Division of City Planning Note: Project Manager must be available by phone during agenda meeting (Wednesday prior to council meeting @ 1:00 p.m.) Purpose To authorize the adoption of the 2020 Hudson County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update. ATTACHMENTS: Section 9.7 - Jersey City Approved by Status: Tanya Marione, Director of Planning Approved - Aug 19 2020 Annisia Cialone, HEDC Director Approved - Aug 20 2020 John McKinney, Attorney None Peter Baker, Corporation Counsel None Amy Forman, Attorney None Nick Strasser, Attorney None Norma Garcia, Attorney None Ray Reddington, Attorney Approved - Aug 31 2020 Jeremy Jacobsen, Attorney None Sapana Shah, Attorney None Brian Platt, Business Administrator Approved - Aug 31 2020 Page 3 of 76 CITY OF JERSEY CITY MUNICIPALITY AT A GLANCE Total Population: 265,932 Total Land Area: 15.86 sq. mi Total Number of Buildings: 35,894 Hurricane Storm Surge 100-Year MRP Event Wind Loss Population Buildings Category 1* 47,796 4,162 Category 2* 71,463 7,392 $29,996,248 Potential Building Damages *Located in SLOSH (Sea, Lake and Overland Surge from Hurricanes) 1% Annual Chance Flood NFIP Statistics 48,082 4,342 126 244 # NFIP Policies Population residing Buildings in Critical facilities # WYO Policies in floodplain floodplain in floodplain 7,185 # RL Properties 4,532 $1,083,767,531 179 (excludes SRL) Persons that may Potential building # SRL Properties seek shelter damages 17 (excludes RL) Mitigation Action Plan (2020-2025) High Ranked Hazard Project Types All Hazards Structure and Infrastructure Projects, Local Plan Hazards and Regulations, Natural Systems Protection, Coastal Storm, Earthquake, Extreme Education and Awareness Programs Temperature, Flood, Severe Storm, Severe Winter Storm Page 4 of 76 Hudson County Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2020 9.7 City of Jersey City This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the City of Jersey City. The annex includes a general overview of the City of Jersey City; an assessment of the City of Jersey City’s risk and vulnerability, and mitigation capabilities; and a prioritized action plan to implement prior to a disaster to reduce future losses and achieve greater resilience to natural hazards. 9.7.1 HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING TEAM The following individuals are the City of Jersey City’s identified hazard mitigation plan primary and alternate points of contact and NFIP Floodplain Administrator. Table 9.7-1. Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact Name / Title: W. Greg Kierce, Director OEM/Homeland Name / Title: Robert Daly, Deputy Chief JCFD / OEMHS Liaison Security Address: 715 Summit Avenue, Jersey City, NJ 07306 Address: 715 Summit Avenue, Jersey City, NJ 07306 Phone Number: 201-577-2348 Phone Number: 201-547-5681 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] NFIP Floodplain Administrator Name / Title: Raymond Meyer, Construction Code Official Address: 1 Jackson Square, Jersey City, NJ 07305 Phone Number: 201-547-5697 Email: [email protected] 9.7.2 JURISDICTION PROFILE According to the Jersey City website (http://www.cityofjerseycity.org): ‘The territory comprising what is now known as Jersey City was a wilderness, occupied by the Lenni Lenape or Delawares, and governed by their tribal laws, until Henry Hudson, an English navigator, in the employ of the Dutch East India Company, seeking another route that would not require the passing of the Spanish coast to the East Indies, and failing in his mission, found these shores.’ Additionally, all of what is currently Jersey City was carved out of what was originally the Township of Bergen in the County of Bergen. During the 19th century, Jersey City played an integral role in the Underground Railroad. Four routes through New Jersey converged in the city. The City of Jersey City is located in the central portion of Hudson County, between the Hackensack River and Newark Bay to the west, and the Hudson River and Upper New York Bay to the east. It is the largest city in Hudson County, in terms of population and geographic size (14.79 square miles). The City has 21.7 miles of waterfront along the rivers and bays. The City is bordered to the north by the Town of Secaucus, The Township of North Bergen, the City of Union City, and the City of Hoboken, to the south by the City of Bayonne, to the east by the Hudson River and Upper Bay, and to the west by Hackensack River, Newark Bay and the Town of Kearny. 9.7-1 SECTION 9.7. CITYPage OF 5 JERSEYof 76 CITY Hudson County Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2020 The City is governed by a Mayor and City Council made up of nine members: one council member for each of the City’s six wards, plus three at-large council members who represent the entire City. This governing body will be responsible for the adoption and implementation of this plan. According to the U.S. Census, the 2010 population for the City of Jersey City was 247,597. The estimated 2017 population was 265,932, a 7.4 percent increase from the 2010 Census. Data from the 2017 U.S. Census American Community Survey indicate that 7.7 percent of the population is 5 years of age or younger and 10.1 percent is 65 years of age or older. Communities must deploy a support system that enables all populations to safely reach shelters or to quickly evacuate a hazard area. 9.7.3 GROWTH/DEVELOPMENT TRENDS Understanding how past, current, and projected development patterns have or are likely to increase or decrease risk in hazard areas is a key component to understanding a jurisdiction’s overall risk to its hazards of concern. Table 9.7-2 summarizes recent and expected future development trends. Refer to Table 9.7-20 through Table 9.7-23 for details regarding major residential/commercial development and major infrastructure development. Refer to Figure 9.7-1 and 9.7-2 at the end of this annex which illustrate the geographically-delineated hazard areas and the location of potential new development, where available. Table 9.7-2. Recent and Expected Future Development Type of Development 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Number of Building Permits for New Construction Issued Since the Previous HMP Single Family 698 units 261 units 359 units 513 units 376 units Multi-Family 2,583 units 2,389 units 2,815 units 3,143 units 3,474 units Other (commercial, mixed-use, etc.) 0 0 0 0 0 Square Ft.
Recommended publications
  • Consenting to the Issuance of Refunding Bonds by the JCMUA, and Authorizing Other Actions in Connection Therewith

    Consenting to the Issuance of Refunding Bonds by the JCMUA, and Authorizing Other Actions in Connection Therewith

    Resolution of the City of Jersey City, N.J. File No. Res. 19-938 Agenda No. 10.12 Approved: Dec 18 2019 OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY RESOLUTIONCONSENTING TO THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS BY THE JERSEY CITY MUNICIPALREFUNDING UTILITIES AUTHORITY, AND AUTHORIZING OTHER ACTIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH COUNCIL offered and moved adoption of the following resolution: WHEREAS, on January 28, 1998, the Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority (the “Authority”), a public body corporate and politic of the State of New Jersey organized pursuant to the Municipal and County Utilities Authorities Law (N.J.S.A. 40:14B-1 et. seq.) (the “Act”), adopted a resolution entitled, “Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of Revenue Bonds of the Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority”, as previously amended and supplemented from time to time (the “General Bond Resolution”); and WHEREAS, pursuant the General Bond Resolution, a Supplemental Water Bond Resolution and a Supplemental Sewer Bond Resolution, each adopted September 22, 2011, the Authority issued $61,765,000 principal amount of Revenue Bonds, Series 2011, on October 28, 2011 (the “2011 Bonds”); and WHEREAS, the Authority desires to refund, on an advance refunding basis, all or a portion of the $22,830,000 outstanding principal amount of the callable 2011 Bonds, maturing on or after October 15, 2022, through the issuance of refunding bonds (the “Authority Refunding Bonds”); and WHEREAS, in accordance with current market conditions, the Authority Refunding Bonds are estimated to produce a net present value savings of approximately $1,200,000 over the term; and WHEREAS, the City of Jersey City (the “City”) and the Authority have entered into (i) a Service Contract with respect to the Sewer System on December 1, 1985, as amended by Amendment No.
  • APPENDIX A. Supplementary Tables

    APPENDIX A. Supplementary Tables

    APPENDIX A. Supplementary Tables Jersey City - Environmental Resource Inventory A-1 Soil Types Table A.1. Soil Types Legend Soil classification reflects the parent material that forms the soil, the soil family, and the slope of the landform. The following information will assist in the interpretation of the Soil Classification table. Capability Class Definition 1 Slight limitations that restrict their use. 2 Moderate limitations that restrict the choice of plants or that require moderate conservation practices 3 Very severe limitations that restrict the choice of plants or that require very careful management, or both. 8 Limitations that preclude commercial plant production and that restrict their use to recreational purposes, wildlife habitat, watershed, or esthetic purposes. In this Table, there are three types of Green Belt soil, each with a different slope range. Slopes are measured in degrees or as a percent; a 450 slope = 100% slope. Each Soil Name is associated with a unique Code. Land Capability Classes reflect the potential for agricultural uses; the higher the class number, the more restricted the potential uses are. The letter that follows the numeric code indicates the reason for restricted uses. For example, Green Belt Loam, 8 to 15 percent slope, is restricted because of the likelihood of erosion. Capability Subclass Definition e The main hazard is the risk of erosion unless close growing plant cover is maintained w Water in or on the soil interferes with plant growth or cultivation (in some soils the wetness can be partly corrected by artificial drainage) s Soil is limited mainly because it is shallow, droughty, or stony Available Water Capacity (AWC) indicates the amount of water available to plants.
  • Making Jersey City's Park System World Class

    Making Jersey City's Park System World Class

    MAKING JERSEY CITY’S PARK SYSTEM WORLD CLASS Jersey City has a very good park system, but it could be elite and truly world class. To take the next step up to that elite class will require boldness, creativity, and investment. By renovating existing parks, following through with the new parks that are in various stages of planning or development, completing the Hackensack and Hudson River walkways, and taking the audacious initiative to connect our waterfronts by a series of greenways will enrich the lives of our citizens and make Jersey City’s park system worthy of global attention. A Public Private Partnership for Nonstop Renovation Jersey City began the process of creating a parks master plan to rate the condition and then to renovate Jersey City’s 67 municipal parks a little over a decade ago. In 2008, after numerous public meetings and robust public input, a 10 year detailed plan to improve Jersey City’s park system was put in place that detailed every upgrade that every park needed and estimated the costs of these upgrades. Over the next several years, serious progress was seen. Ercel Webb Park in Ward F, Muhammad Ali and Bayview parks in Ward A, Hamilton Park in Ward E and Ward B’s Boyd McGuiness Park were all substantially improved under the plan. However, the City simply abandoned the plan shortly after Mayor Fulop took office, as he focused his attention, the City’s resources and public relations on just a couple of park improvements. Consequently, parks such as Pershing Field in the Heights have been left to deteriorate and plans to improve it have been shelved.
  • Hudson County Open Space Advisory Board Recommendations Report

    Hudson County Open Space Advisory Board Recommendations Report

    2009 Hudson County Open Space Advisory Board Recommendations Report Hoboken411.com Open Space, Recreation & Historic Preservation Trust Fund Thomas A. DeGise County Executive Hoboken411.com 2 Hudson County Open Space, Recreation & Historic Preservation Trust COUNTY EXECUTIVE A MESSAGE FROM THE OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD Thomas A. DeGise BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS Dear Friends: Doreen DiDomenico, Chair First District It’s been almost five years since the inception of Hudson County’s first Tilo Rivas, Vice Chair Open Space, Recreation, and Historic Preservation Trust fund. On be‐ Sixth District William O’Dea, Chair Pro Tempore half of the Open Space Advisory Board, we are happy to report that to Second District date, over $26 million in funding has been approved for local govern‐ Albert Cifelli Ninth District ment agencies and non‐profit organizations working to preserve open Jeffrey Dublin space, rehabilitate recreational facilities, and restore historic and cul‐ Third District tural resources. Thomas Liggio Eighth District The preservation of open space along the Hudson, Hackensack, and Jose Muñoz Seventh District Passaic Rivers was achieved ensuring that public access to the water‐ Eliu Rivera front remained a high priority in Hudson County. Countywide athletic Fourth District Anthony Romano facilities were improved with the installation of synthetic turf at sev‐ Fifth District eral parks. The children of Hudson County are now enjoying rehabili‐ OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD tated playgrounds and a new swimming pool facilities. Hudson County Joseph Liccardo, Chair Business Community has also been supportive of efforts to preserve our rich culture and Henry Sanchez, Vice Chair history with funding the restoration of landmark buildings, monu‐ Historic Preservation ments, and museums.
  • Morris Canal Redevelopment Plan

    Morris Canal Redevelopment Plan

    Morris Canal Redevelopment Plan (formerly known as the Garfield - Lafayette Redevelopment Plan) As adopted by the Municipal Council of the City of Jersey City March 1999 Amended February 27, 2002 Amended March 27, 2002 Amended July 26, 2002 Amended November 13, 2002 Amended August 11, 2004 Amended January 11, 2006 Amended October 16, 2006 Amended March 14, 2007 Amended May 28, 2008 – Ord. 08-060 Amended June 25, 2008 – Ord 08-084 Amended December 17, 2008 – Ord 08-169 Amended January 28, 2009 – Ord 09-006 Amended June 17, 2009 –Ord 09-071 Amended May 12, 2010 – Ord 10-064 Amended August 25, 2010 – Ord 10-104 Amended September 29, 2010 – Ord 10-115 Amended November 23, 2010 – Ord 10-156 Amended February 23, 2011 - Ord 11-024 Amended June 29, 2011 – Ord. 11-071 Amended June 27, 2012 – Ord. 12-083 Amended October 9, 2013 – Ord. 13-103 Amended March 12, 2014 – Ord. 14-024 Amended July 16, 2014 – Ord. 14-076 i DIVISION OF CITY PLANNING TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 Background 1 Community Outreach 2 I. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION 4 II. REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GOALS 4 III. PARKS AND GREENSPACE OBJECTIVES 5 IV. GENERAL TRAFFIC CIRCULATION AND PARKING OBJECTIVES: 5 V. STRATEGIC PLAN 10 VI. COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT 11 VII. TYPES OF PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT ACTIONS 12 VIII. GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS 14 IX. GENERAL DESIGN AND LAND USE STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS 16 X. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS 18 XI. LAND USE ZONES AND SPECIFIC LAND USE PROVISIONS 20 A. TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT ZONES 20 B. COMMUTER PARKING 30 C.
  • City of Jersey City New Jersey Audit of Financial

    City of Jersey City New Jersey Audit of Financial

    CITY OF JERSEY CITY NEW JERSEY AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FEDERAL AND STATE GRANT PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND THE TRANSITION YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 WITH REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS AND LETTERS OF COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CITY OF JERSEY CITY AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS DECEMBER 31, 2011 PAGE EXHIBIT TABLE SCHEDULE FINANCIAL SECTION Report of Independent Auditors 1 - 3 Current Fund Comparative Balance Sheet - Regulatory Basis 4 - 5 A Comparative Statement of Operations and Changes in Fund Balance - Regulatory Basis 6 - 7 A-1 Statement of Revenues - Regulatory Basis 8 - 10 A-2 Statement of Revenues - Analysis of Budget Revenues - Regulatory Basis 11 A-2a Statement of Revenues - Analysis of Non-Budget Revenues - Regulatory Basis 12 - 13 A-2b Statement of Appropriations - Regulatory Basis 14 - 25 A-3 Trust Funds Comparative Balance Sheet - Regulatory Basis 26 - 29 B General Capital Fund Comparative Balance Sheet - Regulatory Basis 30 C Statement of Fund Balance - Regulatory Basis 31 C-1 General Fixed Assets Comparative Balance Sheet - Regulatory Basis 32 D Notes to Financial Statements 33 - 92 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA SECTION Current Fund Schedule of: Cash - Treasurer 93 - 94 A-4 Petty Cash 95 A-5 Change Fund 96 A-6 Taxes Receivable and Analysis of Property Tax Levy 97 A-7 Due from State of New Jersey for Senior Citizens' and Veterans' Deductions 98 A-8 Tax Title Liens Receivable 99 A-9 Property Acquired for Taxes at Assessed Valuation 99 A-10 Revenue Accounts Receivable 100 - 101 A-11
  • APPENDIX A: Final Section 4(F) Evaluation Final Section 4(F) Evaluation

    APPENDIX A: Final Section 4(F) Evaluation Final Section 4(F) Evaluation

    NJ TRANSITGRID TRACTION POWER SYSTEM FEIS APPENDIX A: Final Section 4(f) Evaluation Final Section 4(f) Evaluation A.1 INTRODUCTION This Final Section 4(f) Evaluation has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation (USDOT) Act of 1966. Based on the Section 4(f) Evaluation, Federal Transit Administration (FTA) determined that the proposed Project would result in the use of the Old Main Delaware, Lackawanna and Western (DL&W) Railroad Historic District, which is a Section 4(f) property. This chapter discusses the identification of Section 4(f) properties within the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the proposed Project, describes the effect of the proposed Project on those properties, and summarizes measures to minimize harm included as part of the proposed Project. A.2 REGULATORY CONTEXT AND METHODOLOGY Section 4(f) of the USDOT Act of 1966, as amended (23 C.F.R. Part § 774-codified in 49 U.S.C. 303 and generally referred to as “Section 4(f))” prohibits the Secretary of Transportation from approving any program or project that requires the “use” of: (1) any publicly-owned parkland, recreation area, or wildlife/waterfowl refuge of national, state, or local significance; or (2) any land from a historic site of national, state, or local significance (collectively, “Section 4(f) properties”), unless there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of such land and such program and the project includes all possible planning to minimize harm to the park, recreation area, wildlife/waterfowl refuge, or historic site.
  • Sample Cover

    Sample Cover

    TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page Executive Summary i Overview of the Master Planning Process 1 Physical Assessment of the Parks 2 Public Outreach 3 Open Space and Recreation Lands Needs Analysis 4 Recommendations to Increase Open Space 8 Parks and Open Space Map 10 Recreation Facilities Needs Assessment 11 Recommendations to Increase Park Facilities 19 Summary of Existing Park Facilities Ward A - F 23 Improvement Recommendations for Existing Individual Parks 29 1. 16th Street Park 30 2. Alexander F. Santora Park 31 3. Angel Ramos Park 32 4. Apple Tree House 33 5. Arlington Park (William Thorton Park) 34 6. Arthur Ashe Park 35 7. Audubon Park (Major John Desmond Park) 36 8. Bayside Park 38 9. Boyd - McGuiness Park 39 10. Brett Triangle Park 40 11. City Hall Park 41 12. Columbia Park (Greenville Memorial) 42 13. Cornelius Parker Park 43 14. Dr. Edith Bland Phillips Park 45 15. Dr. Lena Edwards Park 46 16. Dr. Rizal Park 47 17. Edward Crincoli Park 48 TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page 18. Fairmont Triangle Park 49 19. Ferris Triangle Park 50 20. First Street Park 51 21. Fitzgerald-Holota Park 53 22. Fulton Avenue Park 54 23. Gateway Park Complex 56 24. Hackensack River Greenway Park 58 25. Hamilton Park 60 26. Harmon Street Pool 62 27. Isetta McDuffy Park 64 28. J. Owen Grundy Park 65 29. Janet Moore Park 66 30. LaPointe Park 67 31. Laurel Court Park 68 32. Leonard Gordon Park 69 33. Lincoln Park West 71 34. Lt. R.B. Grover Memorial Park 73 35. Martiniak-Enright Park 74 36.

  • November 16, 2017 United States Environmental Protection Agency Attn

    November 16, 2017 United States Environmental Protection Agency Attn: Ms. Lya Theodoratos 290 Broadway 18th Floor New York, NY 10007 Re: Jersey City Redevelopment Agency EPA Brownfields Site-Specific Cleanup Grant Application Mill Creek, Block 15801 Lot 77 Dear Ms. Theodoratos: Enclosed please find an application for an EPA Brownfields Site-Specific Cleanup Grant for the above-referenced site for the City of Jersey City. Pertinent applicant information follows: a. Applicant: City of Jersey City 280 Grove Street Jersey City, New Jersey 07302 b. Funding Requested: i) Grant Type - Cleanup ii) Federal Funds Requested - $200,000 iii) Contamination - Hazardous Substances c. Location: The City of Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey d. Property Information: Mill Creek, Block 15801 Lot 77 Jersey Ave Ins. Jersey City, New Jersey 07302 e. Contacts: i) Project Director: Mr. Benjamin Delisle, Director of Development Jersey City Redevelopment Agency 66 York Street, 2nd Floor Jersey City, New Jersey 07302-3839 Email: [email protected] Phone: (201) 761-0822 Fax: (201) 761-0831 ii) Chief Executive: Mayor Steven Fulop 280 Grove St, Jersey City, NJ 07302 Phone: (201) 547-5200 Fax: (201) 547-4288/5442 f. Population: i) Population of the City of Jersey City: 259,651 (2011-2015 American Community Survey) ii) Population of jurisdiction targeted by this grant: 259,651 (2011- 2015 American Community Survey) iii) Statement regarding persistent poverty: Hudson County is not a county experiencing “persistent poverty.” g. Other Factors Checklist Please see attached. I am excited about the opportunity that this funding will provide to the citizens of the City of Jersey City and look forward to a favorable response.
  • Jersey City Planning Board Public Notice Regular Meeting

    Jersey City Planning Board Public Notice Regular Meeting

    JERSEY CITY PLANNING BOARD PUBLIC NOTICE REGULAR MEETING Please take notice the Planning Board took the following action at the Regular Meeting of January 6, 2015 1. Call to Order 2. Sunshine Announcement 3. Roll Call 4. Swear in Staff 5. Correspondence: 6. Old Business: The following case has been dismissed a per Section 345-22(G) and Section 23(G) of the Land Development Ordinance, applications inactive for 6 months are subject to dismissal by the Division of City Planning: P13-073 – 409-411 Fairmount Avenue – Minor Subdivision 7. New Business: THE ORDER OF ITEMS ON THE AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE. 8. Review and discussion of a Master Plan Reexamination Report. Some testimony taken. Continued to February 3, 2015 Planning Board meeting. 9. Review and discussion of Amendments to the Jersey City Master Plan regarding the Historic Preservation Element. Some testimony taken. Continued to February 3, 2015 Planning Board meeting 10. Case: P14-063 Minor Subdivision Applicant: Fields Development Group Co. Attorney: James McCann, Esq. Review Planner: Matt Ward, AICP Address: 193 & 201 Van Vorst Street Block: 14205 Lot: 14 & 17 Zone: Tidewater Basin Redevelopment Plan & Liberty Harbor North Redevelopment Plan Description: Minor Subdivision of two lots into three lots. Existing Buildings to be demolished. Deviation: Two principal structures on one lot. Decision: Approved. 11. Case: P14-059 Minor Site Plan Applicant: Public Storage Attorney: George Garcia Review Planner: Jeff Wenger Address: 124-142 First Street Block: 11503 Lot: 1 Zone: Powerhouse Arts District Redevelopment Plan Description: Temporary Signage To be carried to an unspecified date. 12. Case: P14-069 Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan Applicant: New Gold Equity Corp.
  • JERSEY CITY, NJ Top Reasons Why Jersey City Should Be Amazon’S Hq2

    JERSEY CITY, NJ Top Reasons Why Jersey City Should Be Amazon’S Hq2

    JERSEY CITY, NJ top reasons why jersey city should be amazon’s hq2 Jersey City is the perfect location for Amazon’s new HQ2 facility for 6 key reasons: u Amazon’s insertion into the New York City skyline with available Hudson River waterfront property at a fraction of New York City costs u Over 1 million square feet of move-in ready space along with over 20 million square feet of additional approved development u Up to $5 billion in economic incentives, up to 30 years of property tax abatement, and no city income tax u Unmatched access and connectivity to New York City, New Jersey, the region, and the world u Walking distance from PATH train, light rail, ferries, buses, and bike share u Direct connections to New York City Subway and mass transit u Newark Airport (15 minutes), JFK airport (1 hour), and LaGuardia Airport (1 hour) provide non-stop flights to all major cities across the country and around the world u Convenient 7 minute ferry ride to Amazon offices in Hudson Yards u Highest level of cell and fiber coverage from all major provid- ers already supporting several global financial institutions u A safe, welcoming, exciting, and thriving community providing a higher quality of life than any other area in the region u The most culturally diverse and accepting city in the country 4 minutes 15 TO NYC 7 minutes minutes why jersey city? why jersey TO HUDSON TO EWR YARDS 022 10+ MILES OF COASTLINE SOURCE: Jersey Digs TABLE OF INCENTIVES 10 AND SUPPORT CONTENTS TRANSPORTATION 12 AND ACCESS SITE COMMUNITY AND 06OVERVIEW 16 QUALITY OF LIFE table of contents table 044 22 ECONOMY 32 RECREATION MUSEUMS, 24 EDUCATION 34 ART, CULTURE PUBLIC 28HOUSING 36 SAFETY SITE OVERVIEW Two prime locations along the Hudson River in downtown Jersey City meet and exceed all requirements for Amazon’s HQ2 location.
  • RONALD J. RICCIO March 5, 2020 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS AND

    RONALD J. RICCIO March 5, 2020 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS AND

    RONALD J. RICCIO c/o McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter SITE ADMINISTRATOR One Hovchild Plaza 4000 Route #66, 4th Floor Tinton Falls, New Jersey 07753 Direct Dial: 201-874-4581 Tel. 732-733-6200 Email: [email protected] Fax 732-922-2702 March 5, 2020 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS AND EMAIL The Honorable Jeffrey R. Jablonski, P.J. Ch. Superior Court of New Jersey Brennan Courthouse 583 Newark Avenue Jersey City, New Jersey 07306 Re: PROGRESS REPORT (August 1, 2019 through the date of this Report): New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al. v. Honeywell International, Inc., et al. v. City of Jersey City, et al., Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Hudson County, Civil Action No. HUD-C-77-05; Partial Consent Judgment Concerning the PPG Sites filed June 26, 2009 (the “JCO”) Dear Judge Jablonski: I respectfully submit this Progress Report pursuant to my responsibilities as independent Site Administrator operating under the JCO. This Report covers the period August 1, 2019 through the date of this Report. I submit this Progress Report pursuant to paragraph 1(b)(i)1 of the “Order Administratively Dismissing This Matter Without Prejudice and Retaining Jurisdiction” entered by Judge Sarkisian on May 4, 2016. That Order requires that I provide Progress Reports to the Court twice per year. This is my eighth Progress Report. The prior Progress Reports are dated July 29, 2016, January 27, 2017, July 28, 2017, January 30, 2018, July 31, 2018, January 24, 2019 and July 31, 2019. In addition to serving as Site Administrator, I am also a Court-appointed Mediator pursuant to the February 22, 2016 “Order Referring Third-Party Complaint and Referring Certain Matters to Mediation and Entering Stay” (the “Mediation Order”).