Appendix 1: Theme 3.1 – the Roman Gateway Dover District Heritage Strategy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix 1: Theme 3.1 – the Roman Gateway Dover District Heritage Strategy Appendix 1: Theme 3.1 – The Roman Gateway Dover District Heritage Strategy 1 Wantsum Lydden Valley Cover The Eastern Pharos at Dover Figure 1 Distribution of all Roman activity within Dover District recorded on the Kent Historic Environment Record late summer of 55 BC he left Boulogne with a Theme 3.1 – force of two legions arriving initially off DVBRIS (Dover) intent on landing within that natural harbour. Seeing the massed forces of The Roman the Britons on the overlooking cliffs, the Roman expedition diverted to an open beach Gateway: on the east coast of Kent, generally thought to be around Deal or Walmer. The town of Deal and Walmer can therefore lay claim to Roman being the location of the first recorded major event in British history. invasion, ports 3.4 Caesar’s landing was opposed by the Britons but they were eventually driven back, and defences a camp established at the beachhead and ambassadors and hostages received. The Summary British weather and tides then took a hand, storms preventing the landing of Caesar’s 3.1 Roman remains can be seen in many supporting cavalry and wrecking their places across the country, but it is only in beached fleet. The Britons renewed their Dover District that the complete story of attack on the Roman camp but were Roman Britain can be experienced; from the eventually driven off once again. Caesar first expeditions of Caesar in 55 BC to the realised he could not hold out over winter withdrawal of the last vestiges of Roman and with his fleet repaired as best he could, administration in circa AD 410. It is not he returned to Gaul. surprising then that the District contains some of the country’s finest Roman remains, 3.5 The next year Caesar returned better from outstanding buried archaeology, to the prepared with a force of five legions tallest upstanding Roman building surviving in supported by cavalry. He landed in the same Britain. region as before, this time unopposed and marched inland to defeat the Britons in the Introduction Canterbury area. A storm again wrecked part of Caesar’s fleet and he was forced to march Caesar’s Expeditions of 55 and 54 BC back to the coast and set about their repair, 3.2 The growing influence and expansion of beaching the ships and building a fortified Rome arrived on the doorstep of Kent in the camp to protect the work. Caesar returned first century BC. Trading contact between to his campaign, defeating the massed Britons Britain and the continent and in particular again near Canterbury and pursued them to Gaul was well established. East Kent with its the north banks of the Thames. Despite a natural anchorages and harbours in the diversionary attack on his beach head, Caesar Wantsum and Dover would have been defeated and forced the surrender of particularly important in receiving this trade. Cassivellaunus the Briton leader and accepted hostages and promise of tribute. He returned 3.3 Claiming that the Britons had to Gaul with his entire army. supported the Gauls against him in his conquest of that country, Caesar made The Claudian Invasion of AD 43 preparations for expeditions to Britain. In the 3.6 Following Caesar’s campaigns, Britain Dover District Heritage Strategy 2 Britons were pushed back and pursued across the Thames before Claudius himself arrived for the final push on the Catuvellauni capital of CAMVLODVNVM (Colchester) and the surrender of the British in the south-east. The Gateway to the Province 3.9 The subsequent centuries, as Britain came mostly under Roman rule, saw the growth of Richborough (RVTVPIAE) and Dover (PORTVS DVBRIS) as the major ports of entry to the province at the coastal end of the Roman road network that extended into London (LONDINIVM) and the province. Richborough enjoyed diplomatic and trading links with Rome, with tribute and hostages ensuring no 3.10 Richborough, initially an important direct military action. By AD 43 the political supply base for the conquest, saw the situation was in ferment and Claudius development of streets and timber buildings mounted an invasion, seemingly, to restore on the site of the early beachhead and the Verica, an exiled king of the Atrebates. Four construction of a possible mansio, a hostel to legions and a similar number of auxiliaries provide bed and board to those on imperial under Aulus Plautius crossed the channel to business. A great monument, a quadrifons begin the conquest of Britain. arch, was constructed by Domitian around AD 85, probably to celebrate the completion 3.7 There is much debate about where the of the conquest of the island by Agricola. Its invasion force landed. Richborough (Roman construction coincided with a boom through RVTVPIAE) with the sheltered anchorage of the Wantsum Sea Channel is generally 3 thought to be the location though alternative scenarios have proposed a site on the Solent. The case for Richborough as the prime site of the invasion is strong, though given the size of the force assembled multiple locations are possible. Factors in Richborough’s favour were the ease of the sea crossing from Gaul, the presence of the Wantsum anchorage, the subsequent development of a major entry port and its celebratory monument and the archaeological evidence. Excavations at the site have recorded a double ditch and bank of Claudian date, which is considered to be a beachhead defence. 3.8 Plautius and his legions marched inland to meet and defeat the British forces at a river crossing thought to be the Medway. The Figure 2 Richborough Castle Aerial View showing the earlier 3rd century fort within the upstanding remains of the larger late 3rd century Saxon Short Fort. Figure 3 Richborough forts and vicus revealed through geophysics survey the second century as stone buildings were of the District as the only significant breach constructed, roads re-laid and the port and in the world famous white chalk cliffs, its associated settlement (vicus) flourished. strategically located at the narrowest point of the present English Channel. The mouth of 3.11 The port declined in the third century the river, sheltered beneath the high valley possibly due to competition from other ports sides would have provided a safe haven for such as Dover. The military increased their boats and ships in the Channel. Its proximity presence and fortified the monumental arch, to the continent would have been significant possibly taking advantage of its height as a for its prominence in cross-Channel travel look out. The monument was eventually and international exchange from earliest levelled to make way for a Saxon Shore Fort times and the discovery of the Dover Bronze built by the end of the third century and Age Boat in the early sediments of the river which continued into use as a base for the and the Langdon Wreck outside the river Legio II Augusta until their withdrawal to Gaul mouth underline this. While there is evidence in AD 406. Coin evidence shows that of prehistoric activity and some occupation in Richborough was one of the last places in the Dour valley, the first substantial evidence Britain to be supplied with Roman coinage. comes in the Iron Age with occupation deposits reported from Castle Hill and the Dover town centre. There is suggestion that a 3.12 The town and port of Dover owes its hillfort lay on Castle Hill but this has so far existence to the River Dour in whose valley not been proven. it lies. The Dour originally a small chalk The Romans took advantage of the stream emerging from the North Downs has 3.13 sheltered estuary to create their important over time cut a steep sided valley through the port of Dubris one of the most important chalk bedrock to emerge on the south coast 4 Figure 4 Key features of Roman Dover Dover District Heritage Strategy 5 wall and at least three barrack blocks, the fort appears to have not been completed before a new fort was started on the site around AD 130. This new fort, which extended over an area of about 1.05 hectares, suggesting a substantial military presence, lasted until around the early part of the third century. Association with tiles stamped Classis Britannica has been taken as evidence that the fort served as a fleet base. While large, it may not have been of sufficient size to be the principle base of the Roman fleet which is thought to be at Boulogne, but was certainly an important base and possibly started as a supply base to replace that at Richborough. 3.16 The settlement extended around the fort to cover an area of approximately 5 hectares and included buildings of considerable quality. A large bathhouse, entry points to the Province and a base of constructed around AD 140-160, serving the the Classis Britannica, the Roman naval fleet military and civilian populations of Dover has based in the Channel. Extensive been found to the north of the fort. archaeological work, primarily by Brian Philp Immediately north of the baths a complex of and the Kent Archaeological Rescue Unit has buildings includes exceptionally well- provided much information on the preserved painted wall murals interpreted as development of the Roman harbour, vicus the remains of a mansio. These remains have (extramural settlement) and the fortifications been saved and are on display as the famous at Dover though the matter is complex and a Dover ‘Painted House’. great deal more remains to be learnt about Roman Dover. 3.17 The harbour itself lay within the mouth of the Dour estuary. Harbour works included 3.14 Little is known about the Roman use of a substantial mole, which while protecting the the Dour estuary until the second half of the sheltering vessels from the channel elements, first century AD when a Roman settlement probably also accelerated sedimentation of seems to have been established on the western bank and a harbour established, 6 probably in the latter part of the first century.
Recommended publications
  • The Early Effects of Gunpowder on Fortress Design: a Lasting Impact
    The Early Effects of Gunpowder on Fortress Design: A Lasting Impact MATTHEW BAILEY COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS The introduction of gunpowder did not immediately transform the battlefields of Europe. Designers of fortifications only had to respond to the destructive threats of siege warfare, and witnessing the technical failures of early gunpowder weaponry would hardly have convinced a European magnate to bolster his defenses. This essay follows the advancement of gunpowder tactics in late medieval and early Renaissance Europe. In particular, it focuses on Edward III’s employment of primitive ordnance during the Hundred Years’ War, the role of artillery in the Ottoman conquest of Constantinople, and the organizational challenges of effectively implementing gunpowder as late as the end of the fifteenth century. This essay also seeks to illustrate the nature of the development of fortification in response to the emerging threat of gunpowder siege weaponry, including the architectural theories of the early Renaissance Italians, Henry VIII’s English artillery forts of the mid-sixteenth century, and the evolution of the angle bastion. The article concludes with a short discussion of the longevity and lasting relevance of the fortification technologies developed during the late medieval and early Renaissance eras. The castle was an inseparable component of medieval warfare. Since Duke William of Normandy’s 1066 conquest of Anglo-Saxon England, the construction of castles had become the earmark of medieval territorial expansion. These fortifications were not simply stone squares with round towers adorning the corners. Edward I’s massive castle building program in Wales, for example, resulted in fortifications so visually disparate that one might assume they were from different time periods.1 Medieval engineers had built upon castle technology for centuries by 1500, and the introduction of gunpowder weaponry to the battlefields of Europe foreshadowed a revision of the basics of fortress design.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter C Introduction This Index Covers Volumes 110–112 and 114–120 Inclusive (1992–2000) of Archaeologia Cantiana, Volume 113 Being the Preceding General Index
    Archaeologia Cantiana - On-line Index 2012 GENERAL INDEX TO VOLUMES CX 1992 ( 110 ) to CXX 2000 ( 120 ) Letter C Introduction This index covers volumes 110–112 and 114–120 inclusive (1992–2000) of Archaeologia Cantiana, volume 113 being the preceding General Index. It includes all significant persons, places and subjects with the exception of books reviewed. Volume numbers are shown in bold type and illustrations are denoted by page numbers in italic type or by (illus.) where figures occur throughout the text. The letter n after a page number indicates that the reference will be found in a footnote and pull-out pages are referred to as f – facing. Alphabetisation is word by word. Women are indexed by their maiden name, where known, with cross references from any married name(s). All places within historic Kent are included and are arranged by civil parish. Places that fall within Greater London are to be found listed under their London Borough. Places outside Kent that play a significant part in the text are followed by their post 1974 county. Place names with two elements (e.g. East Peckham, Upper Hardres) will be found indexed under their full place name. T. G. LAWSON, Honorary Editor Kent Archaeological Society, February 2012 Abbreviations m. married Ald. Alderman E. Sussex East Sussex M.P. Member of Parliament b. born ed./eds. editor/editors Notts. Nottinghamshire B. & N.E.S. Bath and North East f facing Oxon. Oxfordshire Somerset fl. floruit P.M. Prime Minister Berks. Berkshire G. London Greater London Pembs. Pembrokeshire Bt. Baronet Gen. General Revd Reverend Bucks.
    [Show full text]
  • Care Services Directory2019/20
    Kent Care Services Directory 2019/20 The essential guide to choosing and paying for care and support In association with www.carechoices.co.uk Contents Introduction 4 Important information 56 How to use this Directory Further help and information The local authority’s role 5 Residential care in Kent 60 A message from Kent County Council Comprehensive listings by region Kent Integrated Care Alliance 7 Useful local contacts 115 Helping to shape health and social care Useful national contacts 117 Helping you to stay independent 7 Local services, equipment and solutions Index 118 Support from the council 12 Specialist indices 127 First steps and assessment Essential checklists Services for carers 15 Assistive technology 9 Assessment, benefits and guidance Home care agency 23 Care homes 49 Care and support in the home 17 Residential dementia care 51 How it can help Living with dementia at home 19 Family support, respite and services Paying for care in your home 21 Understanding your options Home care providers 25 A comprehensive list of local agencies Housing with care 42 The different models available Specialist services 43 Disability care, end of life care and advocacy Care homes 47 All the listings in this publication of care homes, care homes with nursing and home care providers Types of homes and activities explained are supplied by the Care Quality Commission Paying for care 53 (CQC) and Care Choices Ltd cannot be held liable for any errors or omissions. Understanding the system To obtain extra copies of this Directory, free of charge, call Care Choices on 01223 207770.
    [Show full text]
  • Kent Archæological Society Library
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society KENT ARCILEOLOGICAL SOCIETY LIBRARY SIXTH INSTALMENT HUSSEY MS. NOTES THE MS. notes made by Arthur Hussey were given to the Society after his death in 1941. An index exists in the library, almost certainly made by the late B. W. Swithinbank. This is printed as it stands. The number given is that of the bundle or box. D.B.K. F = Family. Acol, see Woodchurch-in-Thanet. Benenden, 12; see also Petham. Ady F, see Eddye. Bethersden, 2; see also Charing Deanery. Alcock F, 11. Betteshanger, 1; see also Kent: Non- Aldington near Lympne, 1. jurors. Aldington near Thurnham, 10. Biddend.en, 10; see also Charing Allcham, 1. Deanery. Appledore, 6; see also Kent: Hermitages. Bigge F, 17. Apulderfield in Cudham, 8. Bigod F, 11. Apulderfield F, 4; see also Whitfield and Bilsington, 7; see also Belgar. Cudham. Birchington, 7; see also Kent: Chantries Ash-next-Fawkham, see Kent: Holy and Woodchurch-in-Thanet. Wells. Bishopsbourne, 2. Ash-next-Sandwich, 7. Blackmanstone, 9. Ashford, 9. Bobbing, 11. at Lese F, 12. Bockingfold, see Brenchley. Aucher F, 4; see also Mottinden. Boleyn F, see Hever. Austen F (Austyn, Astyn), 13; see also Bonnington, 3; see also Goodneston- St. Peter's in Tha,net. next-Wingham and Kent: Chantries. Axon F, 13. Bonner F (Bonnar), 10. Aylesford, 11. Boorman F, 13. Borden, 11. BacIlesmere F, 7; see also Chartham. Boreman F, see Boorman. Baclmangore, see Apulderfield F. Boughton Aluph, see Soalcham. Ballard F, see Chartham.
    [Show full text]
  • Authority Monitoring Report 2019-20
    Authority Monitoring Report 2019 -20 Dover District Local Plan Supporting document DOVER DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN REVIEW AMR 2019-20 Contents Executive Summary 3 1 Introduction 6 2 Local Plan Progress 9 New Dover District Local Plan 9 Evidence Base Update 10 3 Monitoring of Current Policies 14 Adopted Planning Policies 14 Effectiveness of Development Management Policies 28 4 Five Year Housing Land Supply 34 Five Year Housing Land Supply Calculation 34 5 Strategic Sites 37 Dover Waterfont 37 Dover Mid Town 37 Connaught Barracks 38 Whitfield Urban Expansion 38 White Cliffs Business Park 39 6 Infrastructure 42 Community Infrastructure Levy 42 Monitoring S106 Agreements 42 7 Duty to Co-operate 49 The Duty to Co-operate in Practice 49 Community Consultation 64 8 Neighbourhood Planning 67 9 Conclusion 69 Appendices 1 Monitoring Indicators 71 2 Housing Information Audit 2019/20 78 3 Infrastructure Delivery Table 96 4 Appendix 4 Parish Services and Facilities 106 DOVER DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN REVIEW AMR 2019-20 Executive Summary 2 DOVER DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN REVIEW AMR 2019-20 Executive Summary 3 Executive Summary DOVER DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN REVIEW 4 Executive Summary Executive Summary 2019/20 HOMES DELIVERED TYPES OF HOMES SHOWING WHERE MOST HOMES PERMITTED 2019/20 WERE DELIVERED IN 2019/20 IN DESCENDING ORDER IN DESCENDING ORDER Dover 3-BED 1,109 = Aylesham PLANNING = Rural 2-BED APPLICATIONS DETERMINED 4-BED Deal 1-BED PLANNING APPLICATIONS 442 HOMES DELIVERED 2019/20 92%OF PLANNING APPLICATIONS 442442 APPROVED S106 CONTRIBUTIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Quebec House Lorraine Sencicle
    QUEBEC HOUSE LORRAINE SENCICLE ot far from Chartwell Edward Wolfe rented Nis Quebec House, the until 1738, was originally childhood home of Sir built betw een 1530 and General James Wolfe 1550. The first building (1727-1759) and now was an L-shaped timber owned by the National framed house but it was Trust. I was particularly altered in the 1630's to a interested in this part of ‘double pile' house, our trip for my interest in popular at that time. In General James Wolfe the 18th century the front stemmed from when I wall of the house was was preparing the case replaced with a parapet against a proposed fagade but by the 1880s development on Western the house was divided in Heights back in the late two. One part became 1980's, early 1990's. The Quebec House West and main thrust of my was used as a school. James Wolfe argument was about the Courtesy of the National Trust historic fortifications and The National Trust has I drew parallels with those in Quebec, recreated Quebec House in the Georgian Canada. The latter are located within a style, so that the rooms display furniture World Heritage Site, a designation given and artefacts that belonged to the Wolfe in 1985. In English history, Jam es Wolfe family. One room held particular is synonymous with Quebec and I had fascination for both Alan, my husband, every reason to believe that the General and myself, as it was a depository of was in Dover prior to the Quebec papers, pictures and maps appertaining campaign - the trip to Westerham to the events that led up to the historic confirmed this.
    [Show full text]
  • 826 INDEX 1066 Country Walk 195 AA La Ronde
    © Lonely Planet Publications 826 Index 1066 Country Walk 195 animals 85-7, see also birds, individual Cecil Higgins Art Gallery 266 ABBREVIATIONS animals Cheltenham Art Gallery & Museum A ACT Australian Capital books 86 256 A La RondeTerritory 378 internet resources 85 City Museum & Art Gallery 332 abbeys,NSW see New churches South & cathedrals Wales aquariums Dali Universe 127 Abbotsbury,NT Northern 311 Territory Aquarium of the Lakes 709 FACT 680 accommodationQld Queensland 787-90, 791, see Blue Planet Aquarium 674 Ferens Art Gallery 616 alsoSA individualSouth locations Australia Blue Reef Aquarium (Newquay) Graves Gallery 590 activitiesTas 790-2,Tasmania see also individual 401 Guildhall Art Gallery 123 activitiesVic Victoria Blue Reef Aquarium (Portsmouth) Hayward Gallery 127 AintreeWA FestivalWestern 683 Australia INDEX 286 Hereford Museum & Art Gallery 563 air travel Brighton Sea Life Centre 207 Hove Museum & Art Gallery 207 airlines 804 Deep, The 615 Ikon Gallery 534 airports 803-4 London Aquarium 127 Institute of Contemporary Art 118 tickets 804 National Marine Aquarium 384 Keswick Museum & Art Gallery 726 to/from England 803-5 National Sea Life Centre 534 Kettle’s Yard 433 within England 806 Oceanarium 299 Lady Lever Art Gallery 689 Albert Dock 680-1 Sea Life Centre & Marine Laing Art Gallery 749 Aldeburgh 453-5 Sanctuary 638 Leeds Art Gallery 594-5 Alfred the Great 37 archaeological sites, see also Roman Lowry 660 statues 239, 279 sites Manchester Art Gallery 658 All Souls College 228-9 Avebury 326-9, 327, 9 Mercer Art Gallery
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration of Dover Castle, the Main Room
    Restoration of Dover Castle, the main room THE DOVER SOCIETY FOUNDED IN 1988 Registered with the Civic Trust, Affiliated to the Kent Federation of Amenity Societies Registered Charity No. 299954 PRESIDENT Brigadier Maurice Atherton CBE VICE-PRESIDENTS Miss Lillian Kay, Mrs Joan Liggett Peter Marsh, Jonathan Sloggett, Tferry Sutton, Miss Christine Waterman, Jack Woolford THE COMMITTEE Chairman Derek Leach OBE, 24 Riverdale, River, Dover CT17 OGX Tfel: 01304 823926 Email: [email protected] Vice-Chairman Jeremy Cope, 53 Park Avenue, Dover CT16 1HD Tel: 01304 211348 Email: [email protected] Hon. Secretary William Naylor, "Wood End", 87 Leyburne Rd, Dover CT16 1SH Tfel: 01304 211276 Email: [email protected] Hon. Treasurer Mike Weston, 71 Castle Avenue, Dover CT16 1EZ Tfel: 01304 202059 Email: [email protected] Membership Secretary Sheila Cope, 53 Park Avenue, Dover CT16 1HD Tfel: 01304 211348 Social Secretaries Patricia Hooper-Sherratt, Castle Lea, T&swell St, Dover CT16 1SG Tfel: 01304 228129 Email: [email protected] Georgette Rapley, 29 Queen's Gardens, Dover CT17 9AH Tfel: 01304 204514 Email: [email protected] Editor Alan Lee, 8 Cherry Tree Avenue, Dover CT16 2NL Tfel: 01304 213668 Email: [email protected] Press Secretary Tferry Sutton MBE, 17 Bewsbury Cross Lane, Whitfield, Dover CT16 3HB Tfel: 01304 820122 Email: [email protected] Planning Chairman Jack Woolford, 1066 Green Lane, Tfemple Ewell, Dover CT16 3AR Tfel: 01304 330381 Email: [email protected] Committee
    [Show full text]
  • The Oldest Lighthouse 1
    The Oldest Lighthouse 1 The Oldest Lighthouse Ken Trethewey1 Fig. 1: The Pharos at Dover, built around the 2nd c. BCE., is a candidate for the oldest existing lighthouse. Introduction harologists are frequently asked, What is the oldest A light marking the tomb of Achilles at Sigeum in the Plighthouse? The answer is, of course, difficult to Hellespont has frequently been proposed. Its location answer without further qualification. Different people at the entrance to the strategic route between the might argue over the definition of a lighthouse, for Mediterranean and Black Seas would have created example.2 Others might be asking about the first a vital navigational aid as long ago as the twelfth or lighthouse that was ever built. A third group might be thirteenth centuries BCE. This could have inspired ideas asking for the oldest lighthouse they can see right now. of lighthouses, even if its form was inconsistent with All of these questions have been dealt with in detail our traditional designs. In later centuries (though still in my recent publication.3 The paper that follows is an prior to the building of the Alexandrian Pharos) Greeks overview of the subject for the casual reader. seem to have been using small stone towers with fires on top (Figs. 3, 4 and 5) to indicate the approaches Ancient Lighthouses to ports in the Aegean. Thus, however the idea was actually conceived, the Greeks can legitimately claim to Most commonly the answer given to questions have inspired an aid to navigation that has been of great about the oldest lighthouse has been the Pharos at value to mariners right up to the present day.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Parish Registers the Kent History and Library Centre
    A Guide to Parish Registers The Kent History and Library Centre Introduction This handlist includes details of original parish registers, bishops' transcripts and transcripts held at the Kent History and Library Centre and Canterbury Cathedral Archives. There is also a guide to the location of the original registers held at Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre and four other repositories holding registers for parishes that were formerly in Kent. This Guide lists parish names in alphabetical order and indicates where parish registers, bishops' transcripts and transcripts are held. Parish Registers The guide gives details of the christening, marriage and burial registers received to date. Full details of the individual registers will be found in the parish catalogues in the search room and community history area. The majority of these registers are available to view on microfilm. Many of the parish registers for the Canterbury diocese are now available on www.findmypast.co.uk access to which is free in all Kent libraries. Bishops’ Transcripts This Guide gives details of the Bishops’ Transcripts received to date. Full details of the individual registers will be found in the parish handlist in the search room and Community History area. The Bishops Transcripts for both Rochester and Canterbury diocese are held at the Kent History and Library Centre. Transcripts There is a separate guide to the transcripts available at the Kent History and Library Centre. These are mainly modern copies of register entries that have been donated to the
    [Show full text]
  • 68 International Sachsensymposion
    68th International Sachsensymposion Arbeitsgemeinschaft zur Archäologie der Sachsen und ihrer Nachbarvölker in Nordwesteuropa – IvoE Canterbury, 2nd-6th September 2017 Lands and Seas: Post-Roman transitions and relations across the Channel, North Sea and Baltic worlds 68. International Sachsensymposion Canterbury, 2nd – 6th September 2017 2 68. International Sachsensymposion Canterbury, 2nd – 6th September 2017 PROGRAMME – PROGRAMM Saturday 2nd September 09.00 – 11.00 Morning meeting and help point Morgendlicher Treffpunkt und Hilfestelle Canterbury Archaeological Trust, 92a Broad Street, Cantebury CT1 2LU 11.00 – 13.00 City Tour 1 (led by Paul Bennett, meeting point: the Butter Market) Stadtführung 1 (Treffpunkt: the Butter Market) St Augustine’s Abbey Tour (led by Helen Gittos, meeting point: Lady Wootton’s Green) St Augustine’s Abbey Stadtführung (Treffpunkt: Lady Wootton’s Green) 13.00 – 14.00 LUNCH (not provided) Mittagessen (Selbstversorgung) 13.00 – 18.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION Anmeldung zur Konferenz Foyer, Old Sessions House, Canterbury Christ Church University, North Holmes Road, Canterbury CT1 1QU 14.00 – 16.00 City Tour 2 (led by Paul Bennett, meeting point: the Butter Market) Stadtführung 2 (Treffpunkt:the Butter Market) 14.00 – 16.00 Practical workshop on Portable Antiquities. Lg25, Laud, Canterbury Christ Church University, North Holmes Road, Canterbury CT1 1QU Praktischer Workshop zu beweglichen Altertümern 17.00 – 18.00 Opening Reception Eröffnungsempfang Foyer, Old Sessions House, Canterbury Christ Church University,
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Roman Roads in East Kent Margary
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society NOTES ON ROMAN ROADS IN EAST KENT By IvAN D. MARGARY, F.S.A. THE Roman roads of East Kent are generally so obvious and well known that no further description of them seems necessary. There are, however, a few points at which the line is doubtful or where topographical problems admit of some discussion, and it is in considera- tion of these that the following notes are offered. They are based upon field observation made during a visit of some days to the district in June, 1947. STONE STREET—LYMPNE TO CANTERBURY The very striking directness of this road makes it clear that its purpose was to link Canterbury with the Roman port at Lympne. This was probably situated below the old cliffs, near the hamlet of West Hythe, to which access is given by a convenient combo in the cliffs at that point from Shipway Cross above. The Saxon Shore fort at Stutfall Castle was, of course, a late Roman construction, much later than Stone Street, and was probably connected to West Hythe by a spur road below the cliffs, for access to it from Lympne, directly above, would have been awkward. It is to Shipway Cross and the head of the combe that the main alignment of Stone Street is exactly directed. Although it has now disappeared between the Cross and New Inn Green, there are distinct traces of its scattered stone metalling in the field to the south of the Green, while portions of hedgerows and a footpath mark some parts of its course there.
    [Show full text]