NATO's Operation Sea Guardian Alessandra
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Joint Air Power Following the 2016 Warsaw Summit-Urgent Priorities
NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED ING TH LOW E 20 OL 16 F W R A E R W S O A W P R I S U A M T M N I I T O J URGENT PRIORITIES PRIORITIES URGENT UR ES GENT PRIORITI JOINT AIR POWER FOLLOWING THE 2016 WARSAW SUMMIT URGENT PRIORITIES Joint Air Power Competence Centre JOINT AIR POWER NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED Joint Air Power Following the 2016 Warsaw Summit – Urgent Priorities An Allied Command Transformation Headquarters Study Conducted by the Joint Air Power Competence Centre NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED Joint Air Power Following the 2016 Warsaw Summit Urgent Priorities An Allied Command Transformation Headquarters Study Conducted by the Joint Air Power Competence Centre NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED © This work is copyrighted. No part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission. Inquiries should be made to: The Editor, Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC), [email protected] Disclaimer This publication is a Supreme Allied Commander Transformation (SACT) HQ commis- sioned study conducted by the Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC). All copyright and intellectual property rights reside with HQ ACT, unless otherwise licensed. The views expressed in this work do not necessarily represent the position of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), but are offered to foster dialogue and discussion re- garding urgent priorities in the field of air power capabilities and competencies. Though NATO classified documents may have informed the work of the authors, no clas- sified information has been directly quoted in this study, nor were any parts of classified information re-used in any form without prior sanitization. -
Nato's Future: a Tale of Three Summits1 Hans Binnendijk, Senior Fellow, Center for Transatlantic Relations, Johns Hopkins University Sais November 2016 Summary
NATO'S FUTURE: A TALE OF THREE SUMMITS1 HANS BINNENDIJK, SENIOR FELLOW, CENTER FOR TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONS, JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SAIS NOVEMBER 2016 SUMMARY NATO tends to make progress on key policy issues and capability from summit to summit. Major shifts in the orientation of the Alliance can be traced to significant summits like London (1990), Washington (1999), Prague (2002), and Lisbon (2010). During the past two years, NATO has held a summit in Wales (4-5 September 2014) and one in Warsaw (8-9 July 2016). A third mini- summit is planned for Brussels in 2017. These first two summits taken together again significantly shifted the focus of the Alliance in the face of a series of new and dangerous challenges in the East and South. They shifted NATO’s posture in the East from benign neglect to allied reassurance to some degree of deterrence. The proposed force posture is inadequate to defeat a determined Russian short warning attack. Considerable increases in forward deployed forces (perhaps seven brigades) plus strengthened reinforcements would be necessary for NATO to hold its ground. But the Warsaw formula does provide what might be called “deterrence by assured response.” In the South, Allies recognized the complexity of the threats to Europe and sought to define NATO’s role in dealing with them. The third summit next year in Brussels could set the stage for further progress on both fronts. Much more still needs to be done. But with these fairly dramatic changes, NATO is in the process of once again restructuring itself so that it will not be “obsolete” in the effort to provide security for the transatlantic allies. -
Alexander Vershbow
EXCLUSIVE THE THREE SWORDS INTERVIEW "Everything we are doing has a 360-degree scope. We do not have the luxury of choosing between different challenges." ALEXANDER VERSHBOW Interview by Inci Kucukaksoy, JWC PAO and Peter Hutson, JWC CCI&E Branch AMBASSADOR ALEXANDER VERSHBOW served in U.S. Government and NATO appointments for almost four decades. In 2012, he became the first American to hold the position of NATO Deputy Secretary General — the Alliance's second most senior international civil servant — a post from which he retired on 17 October 2016, handing over to Ms Rose Gottemoeller of the United States. A long-time student of Russian Affairs and international relations, Ambassador Vershbow received a B.A. in Russian and East European Studies from Yale University and a Master's Degree in International Relations and Certificate of the Russian Institute from Columbia University. During his career, he has held a series of key assignments, including that of U.S. Ambassador to NATO from 1998 to 2001; "one of the most difficult periods on the international arena since the Cold War," Polish President Andrzej Duda said as he honoured Ambassador Vershbow with Poland's highest distinction of its kind, the Grand Cross of the Order of Merit of the Republic of Poland, at Warsaw's Belweder Palace, on the eve of the Warsaw Summit. The Three Swords magazine has quoted Ambassador Vershbow consistently in every issue since 2012 via NATO's online "Newsroom", where one can check out the full rundown of everything about our Alliance. In our fast-changing world it is important to document NATO's unique story; and, unbeknownst to Ambas- sador Vershbow, he has always inspired us in producing this magazine and charting a course; his opinion pieces rank among our most influential ones. -
Burden Sharing New Commitments in a New
DEFENCE AND SECURITY COMMITTEE (DSC) Sub-Committee on Transatlantic Defence and Security Cooperation (DSCTC) BURDEN SHARING: NEW COMMITMENTS IN A NEW ERA Report by Attila MESTERHAZY (Hungary) Rapporteur 170 DSCTC 18 E rev 1 fin| Original: English | 17 November 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. BURDEN SHARING DEFINED AND IN CONTEXT ............................................................... 1 III. BURDEN SHARING AS A PERENNIAL CHALLENGE IN NATO ........................................... 2 A. WHY THEN THE 2% GUIDELINE? .............................................................................. 2 B. TOWARD THE WALES 2014 JOINT 2% COMMITMENT ............................................. 3 IV. THE 2% DEBATE: LIMITATIONS AND BENEFITS ............................................................... 4 A. DEFENCE SPENDING DEFINED AND CRITICISED ................................................... 4 B. IS 2% VALID FOR ALL? ............................................................................................... 4 C. WHAT ABOUT RISK?................................................................................................... 4 D. INPUTS, OUTPUTS OR BOTH? .................................................................................. 5 V. WARSAW DOUBLES DOWN ON ADAPTATION INCREASING PRESSURE ON THE 2% ... 5 A. RECENT US VIEWS ON BURDEN SHARING ............................................................. 6 B. RHETORIC VERSUS REALITY – THE RENEWED US COMMITMENT TO EUROPEAN SECURITY .................................................................................................................. -
The Making of the 2016 White Paper: Incorporating Society As a Whole
The Making of the 2016 White Paper: Incorporating Society as a Whole Sebastian Maier August 1, 2016 The “2016 White Paper on German Security Policy and the Future of the Bundeswehr” is the most imperative recent document to lay out the Germany’s principles and tools in shaping security policy at large. It discusses key elements of security policy, describes the international security environment, identifies strategic priorities, and points out areas of engagement in which Germany has the opportuni- ty to shape policy. On first read, the paper´s most noticeable strength is the depth in which it explores its many concerns, from traditional policy power plays to the topical challenges of mass migration and climate change. The paper also bears testi- mony to the government´s clearly articulated commitment to a strategy that draws from all segments of society: domestic and international pundits, as well as consultants from both inside and outside the government, participated in drafting and shaping the document. This comprehensive approach to poli- cymaking is in keeping with, and a step forward from, the German Federal Foreign Office´s “Review 2014,” a project that used a socially integrated approach to foreign policy strategy and analysis. The timing of the White Paper coincides with the German parliament’s summer break, sheltering the document somewhat from immediate public scrutiny. It was enacted by the government on July 13, 2016, shortly after NATO’s 2016 Warsaw Summit: it is worth remarking that in the days leading up to the summit, General Secretary Jens Stoltenberg was outspoken in his public remarks on NATO’s antipodes. -
Info Document on Nato Summit
214 SESA 18 E Original: English Annual Session KEY OUTCOMES OF THE SUMMIT OF NATO HEADS OF STATE AND GOVERNMENT HELD IN BRUSSELS, BELGIUM, ON 11-12 JULY 2018 Information document www.nato-pa.int October 2018 214 SESA 18 E TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 II. NATO’S MISSION & VALUES .............................................................................. 2 III. THREAT ENVIRONMENT.................................................................................... 3 IV. PRIORITIES ......................................................................................................... 3 A. BURDEN SHARING ............................................................................................. 3 B. DETERRENCE AND COLLECTIVE DEFENCE, AND RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA ................................................................................................................ 7 1. Relations with Russia ........................................................................................... 7 2. Collective Defence and Deterrence ...................................................................... 7 C. PROJECTING STABILITY AND COMBATTING TERRORISM .......................... 10 D. MODERNISING THE ALLIANCE ....................................................................... 11 E. NATO-EU COOPERATION ................................................................................ 12 V. 70TH ANNIVERSARY AND 2019 ....................................................................... -
NATO and Trump the Case for a New Transatlantic Bargain
NATO and Trump The Case for a New Transatlantic Bargain By Fabrice Pothier and Alexander Vershbow NATO and Trump The Case for a New Transatlantic Bargain By Fabrice Pothier and Alexander Vershbow ISBN: 978-1-61977-400-1 Cover photo: Staff Sgt. Keith Anderson/Wikimedia. Closing Ceremonies for NATO Exercise Iron Sword in Lithuania on November 13, 2014, involving more than 2,500 troops from nine NATO countries. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. June 2017 – Second edition CONTENTS NATO’s Enduring Relevance .................................................... 3 The 2 Percent Ticket to Ride .................................................... 4 European Security Reloaded .................................................... 8 For a More Operational Role in the Middle East ...............12 The Art of Continuous Reform ...............................................14 Conclusion ......................................................................................15 NATO and Trump: The Case for a New Transatlantic Bargain ven before his inauguration, President Donald Trump shook the foundations of NATO more than any of his predecessors. Then candidate Trump’s state- Ements about the unfair fiscal burden carried by the United States compared with its European allies were nothing fundamentally new in NATO’s nearly sev- en-decade history. However, his argument that NATO was “obsolete”1 because it was not doing enough to fight terrorism caused puzzlement in European capitals, given NATO’s fifteen-year involvement in Afghanistan. Of even greater concern, however, was his apparent readiness to make conditional the holiest of holies, the US commitment under Article 5 of NATO’s founding treaty to come to the defense of any ally that comes under attack. -
Counting Dollars Or Measuring Value: Assessing NATO And
JULY 2018 Counting Dollars or Measuring Value Assessing NATO and Partner Burden Sharing AUTHORS Kathleen H. Hicks Jeffrey Rathke Seamus P. Daniels Michael Matlaga Laura Daniels Andrew Linder A Report of the CSIS INTERNATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAM JULY 2018 Counting Dollars or Measuring Value Assessing NATO and Partner Burden Sharing AUTHORS KATHLEEN H. HICKS JEFFREY RATHKE SEAMUS P. DANIELS MICHAEL MATLAGA LAURA DANIELS ANDREW LINDER A Report of the CSIS INTERNATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAM About CSIS For over 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has worked to develop solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. Today, CSIS scholars are providing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 fulltime staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analysis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS was dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has become one of the world’s preeminent international institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global health and economic integration. Thomas J. Pritzker was named chairman of the CSIS Board of Trustees in November 2015. Former U.S. deputy secretary of defense John J. Hamre has served as the Center’s president and chief executive officer since 2000. -
The Western Balkans at a Crossroads
NATO Foundation Defense College The Western Balkans at a crossroads: is still pos- More than twenty years after the end of the wars of Yugoslavia’s dissolution, The NDCF is a unique think-tank: international sible to move from the turbulences that have the easy-to-obtain part of the integration process between the Western Bal- by design and based in Rome, due to its associa- undermined the region in the Nineties towards kans and the Euro-Atlantic institutions has been reached, however today we tion with the NATO Defense College. Its added a future of social integration, economic devel- are at a crucible. value lies in the objectives stated by its charter opment, political stability and the rule of law? A The prospect of EU/NATO integration remains the main vehicle towards and in its international network. positive answer could be found in the process of achieving sustainable regional stability and development. Constant commit- Euro-Atlantic integration. The Western Balkans ment and periodical encouraging signals and incentives are the key elements The charter specifies that the NDCF works with are the beating heart of Europe, they are sur- to support the Western Balkans towards peace, stability and socio-economic the Member States of the Atlantic Alliance, its rounded by EU and NATO members states and progress. According to this context, the conference is structured in three pan- partners and the countries that have some form it is logical to think about them as part of us. We els. of co-operation with NATO. Through the Foun- have the moral obligation to pursue political di- The first panel focuses on the valid reasons to make the good reforms to guar- dation the involvement of USA and Canada is alogue and practical co-operation as well as to antee in the Western Balkans a future of social integration, economic develop- more fluid than in other settings. -
Security & Defence Briefing
SECURITY & DEFENCE BRIEFING FROM THE DESK OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR “CHANGING OF THE GUARD” 24 JULY 2015 (07-2015) It is a pleasure for me to begin this Security service to all Canadians. politiques et des moyens pratiques pour & Defence Briefing by welcoming General éliminer l’inconduite sexuelle au sein de One only need to look at the recent increase Jonathan Vance in his appointment as la profession militaire. Cet engagement in the CAF’s operational tempo, from its Canada’s Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS), démontre que la problématique est prise combat and training mission in Iraq/Syria which took place at a change of command bien au sérieux. to its military trainers for Ukraine, which ceremony on 17 July 2015. General Vance is expected to take full hold in August now I would be remiss if I also didn’t mention has replaced General Tom Lawson, who that much of the legal/diplomatic obstacles that General Vance was a past recipient of retired after an illustrious career of 40 years have been cleared. Canada will also be the CDA Institute’s Vimy Award in 2011. of distinguished service in the Canadian deploying 1,650 troops to Europe in the His appointment comes at a special time Armed Forces (CAF). Earlier this year, fall to take part in NATO’s military exercise for the Vimy Award, as we are excited the Conference of Defence Associations Operation Trident Juncture, alongside an to celebrate the 25th year of hosting and welcomed news that General Vance would offer of key assets to support NATO’s rapid presenting this prestigious award. -
IE Focus INTERNAL NEWSLETTER JULY 2014
IE Focus INTERNAL NEWSLETTER JULY 2014 In this issue: - RCAF wins engineering award - Message from COS(IE) - Chief’s Corner - Update on the Defence Environmental Stragegy RCAF wins engineering award for - Food Waste Management Trial environmental excellence - Central Section - Ethics in the Workplace Par David Elias The citation reads: “in recognition of environmental excellence for the - ADM(IE) BBQ A team of Royal Canadian Air Force CFS Alert Constructed Wetlands engineers based at 1 Canadian Air Waste Water Treatment System – - Record-keeping Division Headquarters in Winnipeg, a practical demonstration of - The Innovators Manitoba, and personnel from alternative treatment options in Stantec Consulting Ltd., have won the High Arctic that successfully - Town Hall an award for environmental exceeds design and performance - Award for an architect excellence for their work at criteria in a demanding location Canadian Forces Station Alert, on and circumstance” - Award the northern tip of Ellesmere Island in Nunavut. The project, which began in 2010, - Distinctions and promotions involves a terraced, overland flow - Order of Military Merit The award was presented on May system, designed by Stantec, that 15, 2014, by the Northwest has established an Arctic wetland. - National Day of Honour It treats waste water at Alert and Territories and Nunavut Association - DCC Award of Professional Engineers and serves as a demonstration project Geoscientists at a ceremony in for other Arctic communities. - Roll out the red carpet! Yellowknife, Northwest Territories. “Our personnel are dedicated to - The Walk/Run in Red The Association recognized the Arctic science and engineering - Retirement waste water treatment system excellence and we are proud of installed at Canadian Forces the men and women involved in this - First-aid story project,” said Major-General Pierre Station Alert, which is a - Greetings, Welcomed back constructed wetland system and St-Amand, the commander of and farewells unique in the world for its high 1 Canadian Air Division. -
IN the MED How NATO Can Refocus Its Efforts in the South and Italy Can Lead the Charge
MORE IN THE MED How NATO Can Refocus its Efforts in the South and Italy Can Lead the Charge Ambassador (Ret.) Alexander R. Vershbow Lauren M. Speranza The Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security works to develop sustainable, nonpartisan strat- egies to address the most important security challenges facing the United States and the world. The Center honors General Brent Scowcroft’s legacy of service and embodies his ethos of non- partisan commitment to the cause of security, support for US leadership in cooperation with allies and partners, and dedication to the mentorship of the next generation of leaders. The Scowcroft Center’s Transatlantic Security Initiative brings together top policymakers, gov- ernment and military officials, business leaders, and experts from Europe and North America to share insights, strengthen cooperation, and develop innovative approaches to the key challenges facing NATO and the transatlantic community. This report was produced as part of the Transatlantic Security Initiative’s work focused on NATO’s southern neighborhood and Mediterranean security, in partnership with Leonardo. About Our Partner Leonardo is a true transatlantic company. Headquartered in Italy, the company has a global foot- print with major industrial activities in Italy, Poland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Leonardo recognizes the importance of NATO and the critical role its industrial dimension plays in enabling the Alliance to meet its objectives. To that end, Leonardo has been a consistent and long-term provider of security technology and expertise to NATO across its strategic systems, including Alliance Ground Surveillance (AGS), Air Command and Control System - Integrated Air Missile Defence (ACCS – IAMD), Allied Future Surveillance and Control (AFSC), cyber defense (NCIRC), and electronic warfare.