DOCSLIB.ORG

Senator James Murray Mason of Virginia Hdt What? Index

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Senator James Murray Mason of Virginia Hdt What? Index GO TO LIST OF PEOPLE INVOLVED IN HARPERS FERRY VARIOUS PERSONAGES INVOLVED IN THE FOMENTING OF RACE WAR (RATHER THAN CIVIL WAR) IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: SENATOR JAMES MURRAY MASON OF VIRGINIA HDT WHAT? INDEX RACE WAR, NOT CIVIL WAR 1779 March: In a letter to George Mason in Virginia which he expected to be shown to Thomas Jefferson, General George Washington complained that during the present “critical period” while the new nation was “verging ... fast to destruction,” Jefferson was at home at Monticello indulging in mere “idleness and dissipation.” Nevertheless Jefferson would remain at home enjoying himself, contributing nothing whatever to the war effort until after the British were quite gone from this area of the country. Even while serving as Virginia’s governor, Jefferson would inevitably resist all pressure to utilize the state militia, saying that he preferred to hold such forces in readiness to suppress any black servile insurrection. The only positive action that Jefferson ever would take during the war was fleeing. This occurred on June 3, 1781, when General Cornwallis dispatched a cavalry party made up of 250 infantry and dragoons under the leadership of Colonel Banastre Tarleton, and the raiding party went out to the Monticello plantation house to apprehend Jefferson. On that day Jefferson, after burning some sensitive papers and sending his favorite servant Martin Hemings off to hide some valuable items, mounted his favorite horse Caractacus and made his getaway. (In this gentleman’s autobiography, there would of course be no mention of such a flight, presumably for the very same reason that there would of course be no mention of Sally or the rugrats.) If Tom could get away with it... Of course, Tom can be excused for being a draft-dodger (like William Jefferson Clinton), as he had in this year more important fish that he needed get fried: A Bill Concerning Slaves Be it enacted by the General Assembly, that no persons shall, henceforth, be slaves within this commonwealth, except such as were so on the first day of this present session of Assembly, and the descendants of the females of them. Negroes and mulattoes which shall hereafter be brought into this commonwealth and kept therein one whole year, together, or so long at different times as shall amount to one year, shall be free. But if they shall not depart the commonwealth within one year thereafter they shall be out of the protection of the laws. Those which shall come into this commonwealth of their own accord shall be out of the protection of the laws; save only such as being seafaring persons and navigating vessels hither, shall not leave the same while here more than twenty four hours together. It shall not be lawful for any person to emancipate a slave but by deed executed, proved and recorded as is required by law in the case of a conveyance of goods and chattels, on consideration not deemed valuable in law, or by last will and testament, and HDT WHAT? INDEX RACE WAR, NOT CIVIL WAR with the free consent of such slave, expressed in presence of the court of the county wherein he resides: And if such slave, so emancipated, shall not within one year thereafter, depart the commonwealth, he shall be out of the protection of the laws. All conditions, restrictions and limitations annexed to any act of emancipation shall be void from the time such emancipation is to take place. If any white woman shall have a child by a negro or mulatto, she and her child shall depart the commonwealth within one year thereafter. If they fail so to do, the woman shall be out of the protection of the laws, and the child shall be bound out by the Aldermen of the county, in like manner as poor orphans are by law directed to be, and within one year after its term of service expired shall depart the commonwealth, or on failure so to do, shall be out of the protection of the laws. Where any of the persons before described shall be disabled from departing the commonwealth by grievous sickness, the protection of the law shall be continued to him until such disability be removed: And if the county shall in the mean time, incur any expence in taking care of him, as of other county poor, the Aldermen shall be intitled to recover the same from his former master, if he had one, his heirs, executors and administrators. No negro or mulatto shall be a witness except in pleas of the commonwealth against negroes or mullatoes, or in civil pleas wherein negroes or mulattoes alone shall be parties. No slave shall go from the tenements of his master, or other person with whom he lives, without a pass, or some letter or token whereby it may appear that he is proceeding by authority from his master, employer, or overseer: If he does, it shall be lawful for any person to apprehend and carry him before a Justice of the Peace, to be by his order punished with stripes, or not, in his discretion. No slave shall keep any arms whatever, nor pass, unless with written orders from his master or employer, or in his company, with arms from one place to another. Arms in possession of a slave contrary to this prohibition shall be forfeited to him who will seize them. Riots, Routs, unlawful assemblies, trespasses and seditious speeches by a negro or mullato shall be punished with stripes at the discretion of a Justice of the Peace; and he who will may apprehend and carry him before such Justice. HDT WHAT? INDEX RACE WAR, NOT CIVIL WAR A question has arisen as to what Tom meant, above, by the phrase “out of the protection of the laws.” When I opinioned that what it must have meant in practice on the ground was “may be killed without penalty,” a senior Jefferson scholar was just outraged. I was set straight in no uncertain terms. No, what it meant was, such a person “would not be entitled to receive any further Welfare payments.” Gosh, how could I have been so utterly wrong! We notice above how the law that Tom wrote did not bear on his personal situation out at the Monticello plantation. He wrote that “If any white woman shall have a child by a negro or mulatto, she and her child shall depart the commonwealth within one year thereafter,” and that otherwise she would be placing herself “out of the protection of the laws” — meaning merely that such a miscegenator wouldn’t be entitled to Welfare or to Aid for Dependent Children, but he did not write that “If any white man [such as himself, for one fine example] shall have a child by a negro or mulatto [such as Tom’s slave girl Sally], he and his child [such as Thomas Jefferson Hemings] shall depart the commonwealth within one year thereafter,” and that otherwise he would be placing himself “out of the protection of the laws” — meaning merely that such a miscegenator wouldn’t be entitled to Welfare or to Aid for Dependent Children. HDT WHAT? INDEX RACE WAR, NOT CIVIL WAR 1798 November 3, Saturday: Wolf Tone surrendered to the British at Buncrana, County Donegal. In the year of the XYZ Affair, so named after 3 anonymous French troublemakers, and of the consequent Alien and Sedition Acts, James Murray Mason was born. During this year, also, the U.S. Marine Corps was beginning its policy of denying enlistment to non-whites, and Ludwig van Beethoven was beginning to be troubled by a ringing in his ears. YOU HAVE TO ACCEPT EITHER THE REALITY OF TIME OVER THAT OF CHANGE, OR CHANGE OVER TIME — IT’S PARMENIDES, OR HERACLITUS. I HAVE GONE WITH HERACLITUS. Not Civil War “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project HDT WHAT? INDEX RACE WAR, NOT CIVIL WAR 1818 After studying under a private tutor and graduating from an academy at Georgetown, District of Columbia, James Murray Mason had entered the University of Pennsylvania. In this year he graduated. John Edwards Holbrook graduated from the University of Pennsylvania with the degree of MD. He would briefly practice as a physician in Boston, and then continue his medical education in London and Edinburgh. Edinburgh he would notice to be “inferior only to London.” While at Glasgow he would have “the satisfaction of hearing one of the most eloquent preachers of the age, Doctor Chalmers. His broad scotch dialect disappointed me in the commencement of his discourse ... but when he was fairly begun I was more directly sensible of the power of eloquence that ever was my lot to be before.” HDT WHAT? INDEX RACE WAR, NOT CIVIL WAR 1820 In this year in which the Federalist Party dissolved and, no longer having any organized opposition, the Jefferson Democrats in consequence disbanded, James Murray Mason graduating from the Department of Law at the College of William and Mary and beginning the practice of law in Winchester, Virginia (he would spend much of his early life tending to his family and to his law practice). HDT WHAT? INDEX RACE WAR, NOT CIVIL WAR 1826 The attorney at law James Mason was elected to represent Frederick County in the Virginia House of Delegates. HDT WHAT? INDEX RACE WAR, NOT CIVIL WAR 1827 That Virginia Delegate James Murray Mason would cling to the doctrine of states’ rights and a strict interpretation of the Constitution had already become evident, in the Giles resolutions, and would continue through the nullification crisis, the 1830s national bank crisis, and into Mason’s senatorial career.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Popular Sovereignty, Slavery in the Territories, and the South, 1785-1860
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2010 Popular sovereignty, slavery in the territories, and the South, 1785-1860 Robert Christopher Childers Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Childers, Robert Christopher, "Popular sovereignty, slavery in the territories, and the South, 1785-1860" (2010). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1135. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1135 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY, SLAVERY IN THE TERRITORIES, AND THE SOUTH, 1785-1860 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Robert Christopher Childers B.S., B.S.E., Emporia State University, 2002 M.A., Emporia State University, 2004 May 2010 For my wife ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Writing history might seem a solitary task, but in truth it is a collaborative effort. Throughout my experience working on this project, I have engaged with fellow scholars whose help has made my work possible. Numerous archivists aided me in the search for sources. Working in the Southern Historical Collection at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill gave me access to the letters and writings of southern leaders and common people alike.
    [Show full text]
  • John Brown, Am Now Quite Certain That the Crimes of This Guilty Land Will Never Be Purged Away but with Blood.”
    Unit 3: A Nation in Crisis The 9/11 of 1859 By Tony Horwitz December 1, 2009 in NY Times ONE hundred and fifty years ago today, the most successful terrorist in American history was hanged at the edge of this Shenandoah Valley town. Before climbing atop his coffin for the wagon ride to the gallows, he handed a note to one of his jailers: “I, John Brown, am now quite certain that the crimes of this guilty land will never be purged away but with blood.” Eighteen months later, Americans went to war against each other, with soldiers marching into battle singing “John Brown’s Body.” More than 600,000 men died before the sin of slavery was purged. Few if any Americans today would question the justness of John Brown’s cause: the abolition of human bondage. But as the nation prepares to try Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, who calls himself the architect of the 9/11 attacks, it may be worth pondering the parallels between John Brown’s raid in 1859 and Al Qaeda’s assault in 2001. Brown was a bearded fundamentalist who believed himself chosen by God to destroy the institution of slavery. He hoped to launch his holy war by seizing the United States armory at Harpers Ferry, Va., and arming blacks for a campaign of liberation. Brown also chose his target for shock value and symbolic impact. The only federal armory in the South, Harpers Ferry was just 60 miles from the capital, where “our president and other leeches,” Brown wrote, did the bidding of slave owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Antislavery Violence and Secession, October 1859
    ANTISLAVERY VIOLENCE AND SECESSION, OCTOBER 1859 – APRIL 1861 by DAVID JONATHAN WHITE GEORGE C. RABLE, COMMITTEE CHAIR LAWRENCE F. KOHL KARI FREDERICKSON HAROLD SELESKY DIANNE BRAGG A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2017 Copyright David Jonathan White 2017 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the collapse of southern Unionism between October 1859 and April 1861. This study argues that a series of events of violent antislavery and southern perceptions of northern support for them caused white southerners to rethink the value of the Union and their place in it. John Brown’s raid at Harpers Ferry, Virginia, and northern expressions of personal support for Brown brought the Union into question in white southern eyes. White southerners were shocked when Republican governors in northern states acted to protect members of John Brown’s organization from prosecution in Virginia. Southern states invested large sums of money in their militia forces, and explored laws to control potentially dangerous populations such as northern travelling salesmen, whites “tampering” with slaves, and free African-Americans. Many Republicans endorsed a book by Hinton Rowan Helper which southerners believed encouraged antislavery violence and a Senate committee investigated whether an antislavery conspiracy had existed before Harpers Ferry. In the summer of 1860, a series of unexplained fires in Texas exacerbated white southern fear. As the presidential election approached in 1860, white southerners hoped for northern voters to repudiate the Republicans. When northern voters did not, white southerners generally rejected the Union.
    [Show full text]
  • John Brown, Abolitionist: the Man Who Killed Slavery, Sparked the Civil War, and Seeded Civil Rights by David S
    John Brown, Abolitionist: The Man Who Killed Slavery, Sparked the Civil War, and Seeded Civil Rights by David S. Reynolds Homegrown Terrorist A Review by Sean Wilentz New Republic Online, 10/27/05 John Brown was a violent charismatic anti-slavery terrorist and traitor, capable of cruelty to his family as well as to his foes. Every one of his murderous ventures failed to achieve its larger goals. His most famous exploit, the attack on Harpers Ferry in October 1859, actually backfired. That backfiring, and not Brown's assault or his later apotheosis by certain abolitionists and Transcendentalists, contributed something, ironically, to the hastening of southern secession and the Civil War. In a topsy-turvy way, Brown may have advanced the anti-slavery cause. Otherwise, he actually damaged the mainstream campaign against slavery, which by the late 1850s was a serious mass political movement contending for national power, and not, as Brown and some of his radical friends saw it, a fraud even more dangerous to the cause of liberty than the slaveholders. This accounting runs against the grain of the usual historical assessments, and also against the grain of David S. Reynolds's "cultural biography" of Brown. The interpretations fall, roughly, into two camps. They agree only about the man's unique importance. Writers hostile to Brown describe him as not merely fanatical but insane, the craziest of all the crazy abolitionists whose agitation drove the country mad and caused the catastrophic, fratricidal, and unnecessary war. Brown's admirers describe his hatred of slavery as a singular sign of sanity in a nation awash in the mental pathologies of racism and bondage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Border South and the Secession Crisis, 1859-1861 Michael Dudley Robinson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2013 Fulcrum of the Union: The Border South and the Secession Crisis, 1859-1861 Michael Dudley Robinson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Robinson, Michael Dudley, "Fulcrum of the Union: The Border South and the Secession Crisis, 1859-1861" (2013). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 894. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/894 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. FULCRUM OF THE UNION: THE BORDER SOUTH AND THE SECESSION CRISIS, 1859- 1861 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Michael Dudley Robinson B.S. North Carolina State University, 2001 M.A. University of North Carolina – Wilmington, 2007 May 2013 For Katherine ii Acknowledgements Throughout the long process of turning a few preliminary thoughts about the secession crisis and the Border South into a finished product, many people have provided assistance, encouragement, and inspiration. The staffs at several libraries and archives helped me to locate items and offered suggestions about collections that otherwise would have gone unnoticed. I would especially like to thank Lucas R.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidents Pro Tempore of the United States Senate Since 1789
    PRO TEM Presidents Pro Tempore of the United States Senate since 1789 4 OIL Presidents Pro Tempore of the United States Senate since 1789 With a preface by Senator Robert C. Byrd, President pro tempore Prepared by the Senate Historical Office under the direction of Nancy Erickson, Secretary of the Senate U. S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 110th Congress, 2d Session Senate Publication 110-18 U.S. Government Printing Office Washington: 2008 COPYRIGHTED MATERIALS Many of the photographs and images in this volume are protected by copyright. Those have been used here with the consent of their respective owners. No republication of copyrighted material may be made without permission in writing from the copyright holder. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data United States. Congress. Senate. Pro tern : presidents pro tempore of the United States Senate since 1789 / prepared by the Senate Historical Office ; under the direction of Nancy Erickson, Secretary of the Senate. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 978-0-16-079984-6 1. United States. Congress. Senate--Presiding officers. 2. United States. Congress. Senate--History. I. Erickson, Nancy. II. United States. Congress. Senate. Historical Office. III. Title. JK1226.U55 2008 328.73092'2--dc22 2008004722 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-0001 ISBN 978-0-16-079984-6 Table of Contents Foreword ................... ................... 3 20. Samuel Smith (MD), 1805-1807, 1808, 1828, 1829-1831 21. John Milledge (GA), 1809 ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Propaganda Use by the Union and Confederacy in Great Britain During the American Civil War, 1861-1862 Annalise Policicchio
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Duquesne University: Digital Commons Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Summer 2012 Propaganda Use by the Union and Confederacy in Great Britain during the American Civil War, 1861-1862 Annalise Policicchio Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Policicchio, A. (2012). Propaganda Use by the Union and Confederacy in Great Britain during the American Civil War, 1861-1862 (Master's thesis, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1053 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PROPAGANDA USE BY THE UNION AND CONFEDERACY IN GREAT BRITAIN DURING THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR, 1861-1862 A Thesis Submitted to the McAnulty College & Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Degree of Masters of History By Annalise L. Policicchio August 2012 Copyright by Annalise L. Policicchio 2012 PROPAGANDA USE BY THE UNION AND CONFEDERACY IN GREAT BRITAIN DURING THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR, 1861-1862 By Annalise L. Policicchio Approved May 2012 ____________________________ ______________________________ Holly Mayer, Ph.D. Perry Blatz, Ph.D. Associate Professor of History Associate Professor of History Thesis Director Thesis Reader ____________________________ ______________________________ James C. Swindal, Ph.D. Holly Mayer, Ph.D. Dean, McAnulty College & Graduate Chair, Department of History School of Liberal Arts iii ABSTRACT PROPAGANDA USE BY THE UNION AND CONFEDERACY IN GREAT BRITAIN DURING THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR, 1861-1862 By Annalise L.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2020 Missouri Roster
    The Missouri Roster 2019–2020 Secretary of State John R. Ashcroft State Capitol Room 208 Jefferson City, MO 65101 www.sos.mo.gov John R. Ashcroft Secretary of State Cover image: A sunrise appears on the horizon over the Missouri River in Jefferson City. Photo courtesy of Tyler Beck Photography www.tylerbeck.photography The Missouri Roster 2019–2020 A directory of state, district, county and federal officials John R. Ashcroft Secretary of State Office of the Secretary of State State of Missouri Jefferson City 65101 STATE CAPITOL John R. Ashcroft ROOM 208 SECRETARY OF STATE (573) 751-2379 Dear Fellow Missourians, As your secretary of state, it is my honor to provide this year’s Mis- souri Roster as a way for you to access Missouri’s elected officials at the county, state and federal levels. This publication provides contact information for officials through- out the state and includes information about personnel within exec- utive branch departments, the General Assembly and the judiciary. Additionally, you will find the most recent municipal classifications and results of the 2018 general election. The strength of our great state depends on open communication and honest, civil debate; we have been given an incredible oppor- tunity to model this for the next generation. I encourage you to par- ticipate in your government, contact your elected representatives and make your voice heard. Sincerely, John R. Ashcroft Secretary of State www.sos.mo.gov The content of the Missouri Roster is public information, and may be used accordingly; however, the arrangement, graphics and maps are copyrighted material.
    [Show full text]
  • The Subject of My Paper Is on the Abolitionist Movement and Gerrit Smith’S Tireless Philanthropic Deeds to See That Slavery Was Abolished
    The subject of my paper is on the Abolitionist movement and Gerrit Smith’s tireless philanthropic deeds to see that slavery was abolished. I am establishing the reason I believe Gerrit Smith did not lose his focus or his passion to help the cause because of his desire to help mankind. Some historians failed to identify with Smith’s ambition and believed over a course of time that he lost his desire to see his dream of equality for all people to be realized. Gerrit Smith was a known abolitionist and philanthropist. He was born on March 6, 1797 in Utica, New York. His parents were Peter Smith and Elizabeth Livingston. Smith’s father worked as a fur trader alongside John Jacob Astor. They received their furs from the Native Americans from Oneida, Mohawk, and the Cayuga tribes in upstate New York.1 Smith and his family moved to Peterboro, New York (Madison County) in 1806 for business purposes. Gerrit was not happy with his new home in Peterboro.2 Smith’s feelings towards his father were undeniable in his letters which indicated harsh criticism. It is clear that Smith did not have a close bond with his father. This tense relationship with his father only made a closer one with his mother. Smith described him to be cold and distant. The only indication as to why Smith detested his father because he did not know how to bond with his children. Smith studied at Hamilton College in 1814. This was an escape for Smith to not only to get away from Peterboro, but to escape from his father whom he did not like.
    [Show full text]
  • Genealogical Notes
    GENEALOGICAL NOTES: CONTAINING THE PEDIGREE OF THE THOMAS FAMILY, OF MARYLAND, AND OF THE FOLLOWING CONNECTED FAMILIES : SNOWDEN-BUCKLEY-LAWRENCE-CHEW- ELLICOTT­ HOPKINS-JOHNSON-RUTHERFURD- . FAIRFAX-SCHIEFFELIN- TYSON AND OTHERS. ILLUSTRATED BY VIEWS AND COATS OF ARMS. BY LAWRENCE BucKLEY T ROMAS. BALTIMORE: LAWRENCE B. THOMAS. 1877. CHARLES HARVEY & CO. Fl:-.E BOOK A'.'iD JOB PRI:-:TFRS. BAL TI MORE, ~tD. C.\REW C.\STLE. PREF~;\CE. This book is mainly compiled from four distinct sources of information, and is complete or the reverse, in accordance with them. These sources are the printed publications of the Record Commission of Great Britain, containing Calendars of State papers, and in some instances, full reprints of the same; the papers at. the Office for the Registry of Wills in Annapolis, Md.; the Manuscript Records of the Society of Friends in Maryland; and Family Bibles. I have also, in a few cases, been aided by the personal knowledge of living members of some of the fami_lies noticed. Where so many are concerned, it may seem invidious to select any for acknowledgment; but I must be permitted to express my feelings of especial gratitude to Mrs. Edward Snowden, of Baltimore; Mrs. Edward P. Thomas and Dr. Francis Thomas, of Montgomery Countv, Md. ; Mr. Richard L. Schieffelin, of New York; Mr. Samuel Chew, of Germantown; Mr. William G. Thomas, of Perth Amboy, N. J., and to the memory of his father, the late Philip E. Thomas, of Baltimore, whose family tree first suggested my present · book. In the course of my labors it has been necessary for me to visit members of the different families with whom I had no previous acquaintance; but, in every instance, I have been received in the most cordial manner, and every facility afforded me for making the desired researches.
    [Show full text]
  • Monopoly & King
    A READER THE LIBERTARIANISM.ORG READER SERIES INTRODUCES THE MAJOR IDEAS AND THINKERS IN THE LIBERTARIAN TRADITION. Who Makes & King Mob Monopoly History Happen? From the ancient origins of their craft, historians have used their work to defend established and powerful interests and regimes. In the modern period, though, historians have emphasized the agency and impact of everyday, average people—common people—without access to conventional political power. Monopoly & King Mob provides readers with dozens of documents from the Early Modern and Modern periods to suggest that the best history is that which accounts for change both “from above” and “from below” in the social hierarchy. When we think of history as the grand timeline of states, politicians, military leaders, great business leaders, and elite philosophers, we skew our view of the world and our ideas about how it works. ANTHONY COMEGNA is the Assistant Editor for Intellectual History at Anthony Comegna Anthony Libertarianism.org and the Cato Institute. He received an MA (2012) and PhD (2016) in Atlantic and American history from the University of Pittsburgh. He produces historical content for Libertarianism.org regularly and is writer/ host of the Liberty Chronicles podcast. $12.95 DESIGN BY: SPENCER FULLER, FACEOUT STUDIO COVER IMAGE: THINKSTOCK Monopoly and King Mob Edited by Anthony Comegna CATO INSTITUTE WASHINGTON, D.C. 109318_FM_R2.indd 3 7/24/18 10:47 AM Copyright © 2018 by the Cato Institute. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-1-944424-56-5 eISBN: 978-1-944424-57-2 Printed in Canada. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data available. 109318_FM_R4.indd 4 25/07/2018 11:38 PM TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: AMERICAN HISTORY, ABOVE AND BELOW .
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Review
    HISTORICAL REVIEW PRIL 1958 The First Butterfield Mail for the Pacific Leaves Tipton, Sept. 16, 1858 Published Quart The State Historical Society of Missouri COLUMBIA, MISSOURI THE STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MISSOURI The State Historical Society of Missouri heretofore organized under the laws of this State, shall be the trustee of this State—Laws of Missouri, 1899, R. S. of Mo., 1949, Chapter 183. OFFICERS 1956-1959 RUSH H. LIMBAUGH, Cape Girardeau, President L. E. MEADOR, Springfield, First Vice-President WILLIAM L. BRADSHAW, Columbia, Second Vice-President * ROBERT S. WITHERS, Liberty, Third Vice-President GEORGE FULLER GREEN, Kansas City, Fourth Vice-President PORTER FISHER, New London, Fifth Vice-President T. H. B. DUNNEGAN, Bolivar, Sixth Vice-President R. B. PRICE, Columbia, Treasurer FLOYD C. SHOEMAKER, Columbia, Secretary and Librarian TRUSTEES Permanent Trustees, Former Presidents of the Society ALLEN MCREYNOLDS, Carthage L. M. WHITE, Mexico GEORGE A. ROZIER, Jefferson City G. L. ZWICK, St. Joseph E. E. SWAIN, Kirksville Term Expires at Annual Meeting, 1958 CHESTER A. BRADLEY, Kansas City FRANK L. MOTT, Columbia RAY V. DENSLOW, Trenton GEORGE H. SCRUTON, Sedalia ALFRED O. FUERBRINGER, St. Louis JAMES TODD, Moberly ROBERT S. GREEN, Mexico T. BALLARD WATTERS, Marshfield Term Expires at Annual Meeting, 1959 F. C. BARNHILL, Marshall STEPHEN B. HUNTER, Cape Girardeau FRANK P. BRIGGS, Macon RALPH P. JOHNSON, Osceola HENRY A. BUNDSCHU, Independence ROY D. WILLIAMS, Boonville W. C. HEWITT, Shelbyville GEORGE C. WILLSON, St. Louis Term Expires at Annual Meeting, 1960 RALPH P. BIEBER, St. Louis LEO J. ROZIER, Perryville BARTLETT BODER, St. Joseph ISRAEL A. SMITH, Independence L.
    [Show full text]