Pastoral at the Boundaries: the Hybridization of Genre in the Fourteenth-Century Italian Eclogue Revival

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pastoral at the Boundaries: the Hybridization of Genre in the Fourteenth-Century Italian Eclogue Revival Pastoral at the Boundaries: The Hybridization of Genre in the Fourteenth-Century Italian Eclogue Revival By Jonathan David Combs-Schilling A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Italian Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Albert Russell Ascoli, Chair Professor Steven Botterill Professor Timothy Hampton Fall 2012 Abstract Pastoral at the Boundaries: The Hybridization of Genre in the Fourteenth-Century Italian Eclogue Revival by Jonathan David Combs-Schilling Doctor of Philosophy in Italian Studies University of California, Berkeley Professor Albert Russell Ascoli, Chair This dissertation demonstrates that one of the principal aspects of pastoral is its identity as a metagenre by focusing attention on the Latin pastoral production of the fourteenth-century eclogue revival in Italy, and by integrating that production into larger estimations of pastoral’s history. Long taken to be a closed circuit within, or a derivative offshoot of, the genre’s history, the eclogues of Dante, Petrarch and Boccaccio at once accentuated the metageneric elements of classical pastoral and influenced the future of pastoral representations through their consistent exploration of pastoral’s boundary- crossing double move—an expansionary movement outward into the representational terrain of other genres and a recuperative (and incorporative) return to the fold. My first chapter, “Dante’s Two Reeds: Pastoral Hierarchies and Hybrids,” examines Dante in terms of this double move, positions his eclogues at the origins of a new era of pastoral representation, and addresses why the first continuous tradition of pastoral production in the history of the genre begins with their 165 verses. I individuate one of the principal causes of their influence to be the epistolary context out of which they were forged. By sending his eclogues as letters to the protohumanist Giovanni del Virgilio, Dante harnesses the boundary-traversing movement of epistolarity and invests the metageneric movement of pastoral with a new critical thrust. With this new orientation, Dante utilizes the genre’s self-figured humility to interrogate and overturn Giovanni’s rigid distinctions between high and low literature and, in the systematically hybrid second eclogue, produces a pastoral fiction that is at once low and high. There is both a vertical and a horizontal aspect to Dante’s use of pastoral as metagenre, and though the two are conjoined, my next two chapters argue that Petrarch explores its vertical aspect through a methodical comparison with epic, while Boccaccio explores its horizontal aspect through a narratologically innovative breach of pastoral’s diegetic horizon. In chapter 2, “Translatio bucolicorum: Pastoral and the Place of Epic in Petrarch’s Bucolicum carmen,” through an analysis of his first eclogue and his letters, in particular Familiares 21.15, I reveal that Petrarch conceived of his collection as a response to the letter that Giovanni had sent Dante, whereby he not only attempts to replace Dante as the originator of the pastoral revival but also figures his collection as an 1 “answer” to Giovanni’s request for a new Latin epic. In this light, I proceed to examine Petrarch’s pervasive appropriation of epic tropes and strategies, in particular translatio imperii, as he extends the implications of Dante’s high-low hybrid to pastoralize the book of epic, and in the process generates the first modern collection of eclogues. In my third chapter, “Tending to the Boundary: Between Inner and Outer Pastoral in Boccaccio’s Buccolicum carmen,” I redress critical estimations of Boccaccio’s usage of allegory in his eclogue collection to show that it is not a departure from “authentic” pastoral but rather works in concert with the other innovations he brings to the genre, most noticeably the sharp increase in dramatic movement within the eclogues and the narratological complexity deployed in the songs of their protagonists. By narrativizing the arrival of allegory to the landscape of pastoral, as well as its departure, Boccaccio drastically increases the genre’s representational purview while also maintaining the autonomy of its fictions. This provokes a doubling of the landscape, which becomes mapped into two distinct but overlapping spaces: an inner pastoral, a more conventional Arcadian scene, and an outer pastoral, a liminal space where the genre encounters and pastoralizes the system of literature beyond its borders. The cumulative effect of this inquiry is a two-fold recognition: first, while still respecting the distinctions between the pastoral poetics of the tre corone, we can meaningfully speak of the fourteenth-century eclogue revival as a movement; and, second, it was a movement that helped shape pastoral’s future as a metagenre. 2 For Kathleen McDermott and William Sloane Coffin senza di voi languisce il cor i Table of Contents Acknowledgments iii Introduction Pastoral as Metagenre 1-10 Chapter 1 Dante’s High and Low Reeds: 11-44 Pastoral Hierarchies and Hybrids Chapter 2 Translatio bucolicorum: 45-82 Pastoral and the Place of Epic in Petrarch’s Bucolicum carmen Chapter 3 Tending to the Boundary: 83-122 Between Inner and Outer Pastoral in Boccaccio’s Buccolicum carmen Bibliography 123-35 ii Acknowledgments That I should have become so invested in the affairs of shepherds surprises no one more so than me. Yet with the dissertation now complete, I can see that the seeds of this project were planted in the years 2000-2001, while I was still an undergraduate, during my studies with Professors Jean Howard and Teodolinda Barolini. With the former, I first encountered the green fields of pastoral, in the form of Spenser’s Shepheardes Calender, and under the latter’s guidance I began to approach the three poets at the heart of this dissertation: Dante, Petrarch and Boccaccio. Without the two of them, I would not do what I do, and for this and much more, I give them my most heartfelt thanks. My greatest debt is owed to the members of my dissertation committee. Professor Albert Russell Ascoli has been an illuminating guide, a tireless reader, and a nourishing mentor at every stage of this project and has become a dear friend in the process. I will happily carry my professional and personal debt to him for many years to come. My deepest thanks as well to Professor Timothy Hampton, in whose office hours I first forged my take on pastoral. His intellectual exuberance has made this process more enjoyable, and his probing questions have made me a better reader. Finally, Professor Steven Botterill, through his encouragement, advice, consistent acts of kindness, and sharp eye for grammatical infelicities has improved the process of, and hopefully the writing contained within, this dissertation. It has been an unqualified pleasure to work with all three of them. My gratitude extends to other Berkeley professors. In particular, I am most grateful for Louise George Clubb’s warm and generous mentorship. It was an honor to be one of her final students, and I hope to be able to explore as deeply and defend as eloquently a genre that is dear to her heart. My thanks, as well, to Professors Mia Fuller and Barbara Spackman who have improved and enlivened my time at Berkeley. Over the years, there have also been many others who have offered their receptive ears to my take on pastoral, and so I extend many thanks to the following professors for their insightful and encouraging comments: Theodore J. Cachey Jr., William J. Kennedy, Ronald L. Martinez, Giuseppe Mazzotta, Jane Tylus, and David Quint. The quality of my experience in graduate school has been improved immeasurably by the community that I have encountered here. I offer my thanks, first, to Aileen Astorga Feng and Stephanie Malia Hom who have offered me invaluable advice and kind encouragement at every turn. My heartfelt thanks as well to Sole Anatrone, Chris Atwood, Greg Bonetti, Angela Matilde Capodivacca, Chris Churchill, Kfir Cohen, Craig Davidson, Armando Di Carlo, Leslie Elwell, Marisa Escolar, Jennifer Johung, Kate Noson, Rebecca Falkoff, Nandini Pandey, Camille Peters, Ariel Shannon, Sara Troyani, Rhiannon Welch, Fabiana Woodfin, and Brandon Woolf. And my many, many thanks and love to Natalie Cleaver, Anthony Martire, Scott Millspaugh, and Kelly Rafferty, who have made these last years the happiest of my life. Finally, my deepest gratitude to my parents for their ceaseless support and boundless affection. iii Introduction Pastoral as Metagenre Few literary categories have been laden with more ponderous and variegated forms of non-literary significance than has pastoral. In the two millennia of its reception history, many a reader has considered it light fare, a pleasant but frivolous retreat from the cares of the modern world (or, in Samuel Johnson’s more caustic formulation, an “easy, vulgar, and therefore disgusting” poetic enterprise),1 yet those critics who have found a greater substance beneath the humble garb of shepherds have taken pastoral very seriously indeed. The discrete boundaries of Arcadia have been claimed variously as part of the vast territories of philosophy, theology, and politics, while the effects engendered by its landscape and by its inhabitants have been categorized as a vehicle for the moral reformation of its readers, an outlet for their anxiety concerning urban existence, and a mirror in which their basic humanity is reflected.2 The proliferation of intellectual,
Recommended publications
  • A Hell of a City: Dante's Inferno on the Road to Rome ([email protected]) DANTE's WORKS Rime (Rhymes): D.'S Lyrical Poems, Cons
    A Hell of a City: Dante’s Inferno on the Road to Rome ([email protected]) DANTE’S WORKS Rime (Rhymes): D.'s lyrical poems, consisting of sonnets, canzoni, ballate, and sestine, written between 1283 [?] and 1308 [?]. A large proportion of these belong to the Vita Nuova, and a few to the Convivio; the rest appear to be independent pieces, though the rime petrose (or “stony poems,” Rime c-ciii), so called from the frequent recurrence in them of the word pietra, form a special group, as does the six sonnet tenzone with Forese Donati: http://etcweb.princeton.edu/dante/pdp/rime.html (Testo critico della Societa' Dantesca Italiana; Florence: Societa' Dantesca Italiana, 1960. Edited by Michele Barbi. Translated by K. Foster and P. Boyde.) Vita nova (The New Life): Thirty-one of Dante's lyrics surrounded by an unprecedented self-commentary forming a narrative of his love for Beatrice (1293?). D.'s New Life, i.e. according to some his 'young life', but more probably his 'life made new' by his love for Beatrice. The work is written in Italian, partly in prose partly in verse (prosimetron), the prose text being a vehicle for the introduction, the narrative of his love story, and the interpretation of the poems. The work features 25 sonnets (of which 2 are irregular), 5 canzoni (2 of which are imperfect), and 1 ballata: http://etcweb.princeton.edu/dante/pdp/vnuova.html (Testo critico della Società Dantesca Italiana; Florence: Società Dantesca Italiana, 1960. Edited by Michele Barbi. Translated by Mark Musa.) In the Vita Nuova, which is addressed to his 'first friend', Guido Cavalcanti, D.
    [Show full text]
  • De Vulgari Eloquentia
    The De vulgari eloquentia, written by Dante in the early years of the fourteenth century, is the only known work of medieval literary theory to have been produced by a practising poet, and the first to assert the intrinsic superiority of living, vernacular languages over Latin. Its opening consideration of language as a sign-system includes foreshadowings of twentieth-century semiotics, and later sections contain the first serious effort at literary criticism based on close ana- lytical reading since the classical era. Steven Botterill here offers an accurate Latin text and a readable English translation of the treatise, together with notes and introductory material, thus making available a work which is relevant not only to Dante's poetry and the history of Italian literature, but to our whole understanding of late medieval poetics, linguistics and literary practice. Cambridge Medieval Classics General editor PETER DRONKE, FBA Professor of Medieval Latin Literature, University of Cambridge This series is designed to provide bilingual editions of medieval Latin and Greek works of prose, poetry, and drama dating from the period c. 350 - c. 1350. The original texts are offered on left-hand pages, with facing-page versions in lively modern English, newly translated for the series. There are introductions, and explanatory and textual notes. The Cambridge Medieval Classics series allows access, often for the first time, to out- standing writing of the Middle Ages, with an emphasis on texts that are representative of key literary traditions and which offer penetrating insights into the culture of med- ieval Europe. Medieval politics, society, humour, and religion are all represented in the range of editions produced here.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrarch and Boccaccio Mimesis
    Petrarch and Boccaccio Mimesis Romanische Literaturen der Welt Herausgegeben von Ottmar Ette Band 61 Petrarch and Boccaccio The Unity of Knowledge in the Pre-modern World Edited by Igor Candido An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative and links to the Open Access version can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. The Open Access book is available at www.degruyter.com. ISBN 978-3-11-042514-7 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-041930-6 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-041958-0 ISSN 0178-7489 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 license. For more information, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2018 Igor Candido, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Typesetting: Konvertus, Haarlem Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Dedicated to Ronald Witt (1932–2017) Contents Acknowledgments IX Igor Candido Introduction 1 H. Wayne Storey The
    [Show full text]
  • Dante's Divine Comedy
    Criterion: A Journal of Literary Criticism Volume 10 | Issue 1 Article 7 2017 Dante’s Divine Comedy: A Pastoral Subversion Katie Francom Brigham Young University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/criterion Part of the Italian Literature Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Francom, Katie (2017) "Dante’s Divine Comedy: A Pastoral Subversion," Criterion: A Journal of Literary Criticism: Vol. 10 : Iss. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/criterion/vol10/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the All Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Criterion: A Journal of Literary Criticism by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Dante’s Divine Comedy: A Pastoral Subversion Cover Page Footnote A huge thank you to Dr. Michael Lavers for encouraging me to write and publish this article and to Adrian Ramjoué for his editing expertise. This article is available in Criterion: A Journal of Literary Criticism: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/criterion/vol10/iss1/7 Dante’s Divine Comedy A Pastoral Subversion Katie Francom In Virgil’s writings, “pastoral poetry came to be used as a vehicle for allegory or veiled social and political comment” (“Pastoral Poetry”). It is thus fitting that Dante, in his attempt to write what he believed to be the greatest allegory ever created, chose Virgil to be his literary and narrative guide. Dante pulls from what Prue Shaw, a prominent Dante critic, calls the “fertilising powers” of Virgil’s allegorical and pastoral influences throughout The Divine Comedy (172).
    [Show full text]
  • Dictynna, 14 | 2017 ‘Pastoral and Its Futures: Reading Like (A) Mantuan’ 2
    Dictynna Revue de poétique latine 14 | 2017 Varia ‘Pastoral and its futures: reading like (a) Mantuan’ Stephen Hinds Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/dictynna/1443 DOI: 10.4000/dictynna.1443 ISSN: 1765-3142 Electronic reference Stephen Hinds, « ‘Pastoral and its futures: reading like (a) Mantuan’ », Dictynna [Online], 14 | 2017, Online since 21 November 2017, connection on 10 September 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/dictynna/1443 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/dictynna.1443 This text was automatically generated on 10 September 2020. Les contenus des la revue Dictynna sont mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. ‘Pastoral and its futures: reading like (a) Mantuan’ 1 ‘Pastoral and its futures: reading like (a) Mantuan’ Stephen Hinds BAPTISTA MANTUANUS (1447-1516): THE ADULESCENTIA 1 This paper offers some glimpses of a particular moment in early modern pastoral tradition, with two purposes: first, to map the self-awareness of one post-Virgilian poet’s interventions in pastoral tradition, an episode of literary historical reflexivity which I offer, as such, to Alain Deremetz, author of Le miroir des muses;1 but also, as a second methodological emphasis, to dramatize the spacious reach of Virgilian pastoral when it is viewed in the future tense, through the history of its early modern reception, and to suggest that that spaciousness is inseparable from the idea of ‘Virgil’ for an interpreter of
    [Show full text]
  • American Dante Bibliography for 1984.Pdf
    American Dante Bibliography for 1984 Christopher Kleinhenz and Anthony L. Pellegrini This bibliography is intended to include the Dante translations published in this country in 1984 and all Dante studies and reviews published in 1984 that are in any sense American. The latter criterion is construed to include foreign reviews of American publications pertaining to Dante. For their invaluable assistance in the preparation of this bibliography and its annotations our special thanks go to the following graduate students at the University of Wisconsin: Tonia Bernardi, Giuseppe Candela, Scott Eagleburger, Jay Filipiak, Edward Hagman, John Meany, Pauline Scott, Elizabeth Serrin, and Scott Troyan. Translations The Divine Comedy. Vol. 1: Inferno. Translated with an introduction, notes, and commentary by Mark Musa. Harmondsworth and New York: Penguin Books, 1984. 430 p. illus., diagrs. This translation, originally published in 1971 by Indiana University Press (see Dante Studies, XC, 175), is here reprinted without the R.M. Powers drawings but with the addition of diagrams of Dante’s Hell, “An Introduction to Dante and His Works,” a “Glossary and Index of Persons and Places,” and a “Selected Bibliography.” Also, the arguments are prefixed to their respective cantos. The Divine Comedy of Dante Alighieri. [II. Purgatorio.] A verse translation, with an introduction, by Allen Mandelbaum. Notes by Laury Magnus, Allen Mandelbaum, and Anthony Oldcorn, with Daniel Feldman. Drawings by Barry Moser. Toronto, N.Y.: Bantam Books, 1984. xxx, 411 p. illus., diagrs (Bantam Classics.) Paperback reprint of the original edition by University of California Press, 1982 (see Dante Studies, CI, 193), with the addition of diagrams and annotations to the text.
    [Show full text]
  • BOCCACCIO ~-' 'I:11B~ Ijr,-N;L!All't'f.'•Tttd~Ri'i Qn~T'li:\.T1.' P,;~Fh;Wi ;::~ R~ N R- 1.1I-1 Nl~Crnn N.1Pt11 Fi."Ii Eft
    :) BOCCACCIO ~-' 'i:11b~ iJr,-n;l!all't'f.'•tttd~ri'i qn~t'li:\.t1.' p,;~fh;wi ;::~ r~ n r- 1.1i-1 nl~crnn n.1pt11 fi."ii eft. Orr:>:~ .ttb!u·.~r"Anf.1mf.,n·n~:ntllc'"n·u t'C\" nmor.:-;tn"IO tli"i1.thll1te frtri!'t"'n:o h.k if,,~,,n t!ctnri fnhctti.11J:'J~rttt~ lchin'IUl 11CI,p:rl:'•1toef.mg;mncm,~tlii ri-cllll'lbl A CriticaL Guide to the CompLete Work.! nn~mtptflC."t'tiicfnhtttthiqtttot>t~l nt c: ~11t'}\1UH1ft:IJ.lffccpj!Urt<.1CNI7Uclutt i t'trfttffinntvpt!atilntcoolh~;YFfrc-.•ltta mihml1fcmpm.t~ncn:ncmn1Dn!6-c,tft· C.-J1.lm1lfmll!t'"li rtc/,1t1.1BI?t'rdupl{CW:! mm t!;l mfhttl.'l .~cb.tlam -zvllm r.am urrp tmn.,, rJ!I,lG JlmC'\\ fi:tm'':rn hltiftntnac •mllll~plimmit1"}.'0nf1Imc-'tlli~l.lH ,'C(I.p.flo:mt:f'IC"tmnlmllnl.lhcllc-1'}:\m f!4ct ,\ lCMtJ.YCll t'l:t.}lttllrhlllt.Cdtnl.ph:­ ntr>l\1 Gl~l ,1nJt CQ..1pn.In hro:afttil·'t/.1 mfrnr 11o: n1~ua ttt11't'Q.l o Hignc i:ll:fl\\),thh.u:l.tn.--fi,tr imnnJO.!?.tc<crniC"< bhtc M<J:ll\".ltfli n1ltt111DlC ,l.:..llttb:fitmt. mr.r~ld,fA,nM(I6UOl\mcpm,tnl3fnlll~. Edited by Victoria Kirkham, Michael Sherberg, and Janet Levarie Smarr THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS Chicago ano Lonoon cHAPTER THIRTEEN THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE 0 F THE SELF • (Buccoficum carmen) David Lummus he Buccoficum carmen, the single major poetic work in Latin by Boc­ Tcaccio, is arguably also the most ambitious poetic work in his corpus.1 Boccaccio himself seems to claim as much in the Geneawgia oeorum gentilium when he defends the opinion that poets often hide meanings beneath the veil of stories, citing himself along with Virgil, Dante, and Petrarch.
    [Show full text]
  • Redating Pericles: a Re-Examination of Shakespeare’S
    REDATING PERICLES: A RE-EXAMINATION OF SHAKESPEARE’S PERICLES AS AN ELIZABETHAN PLAY A THESIS IN Theatre Presented to the Faculty of the University of Missouri-Kansas City in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS by Michelle Elaine Stelting University of Missouri Kansas City December 2015 © 2015 MICHELLE ELAINE STELTING ALL RIGHTS RESERVED REDATING PERICLES: A RE-EXAMINATION OF SHAKESPEARE’S PERICLES AS AN ELIZABETHAN PLAY Michelle Elaine Stelting, Candidate for the Master of Arts Degree University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2015 ABSTRACT Pericles's apparent inferiority to Shakespeare’s mature works raises many questions for scholars. Was Shakespeare collaborating with an inferior playwright or playwrights? Did he allow so many corrupt printed versions of his works after 1604 out of indifference? Re-dating Pericles from the Jacobean to the Elizabethan era answers these questions and reveals previously unexamined connections between topical references in Pericles and events and personalities in the court of Elizabeth I: John Dee, Philip Sidney, Edward de Vere, and many others. The tournament impresas, alchemical symbolism of the story, and its lunar and astronomical imagery suggest Pericles was written long before 1608. Finally, Shakespeare’s focus on father-daughter relationships, and the importance of Marina, the daughter, as the heroine of the story, point to Pericles as written for a young girl. This thesis uses topical references, Shakespeare’s anachronisms, Shakespeare’s sources, stylometry and textual analysis, as well as Henslowe’s diary, the Stationers' Register, and other contemporary documentary evidence to determine whether there may have been versions of Pericles circulating before the accepted date of 1608.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lusiad of Luis De Camoens, Closely Translated. with a Portrait
    I LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. I m ti UXITED STATES OF AMEKICA.| ." r ., ; fear, les$ iapi^y thaTLxenoYniBd (2_.CX/\AAJ^<vi^ ^ V>-U^ cbu THE LUSIAD OP LUIS DE CAMOENS, CLOSELY TRANSLATED. WITH A PORTRAIT OF THE POET, A COMPENDIUM OF HIS LIFE, AN INDEX TO THE PRINCIPAL PASSAGES OP HIS POEM, A VIEW OF THE " FOUNTAIN OF TEARS,' AND MARGINAL AND ANNEXED NOTES, ORIGINAL AND SELECT. BY Lt.-COLl. SIE T. LIVINGSTON MITCHELL, Kt. D.C.L. LONDON : T. k W. BOONE, NEW BOND STREET. 1854. TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE THOMAS EARL OF DUNDONALD, G.C.B. YICE ADiriEAL OE THE BLUE, GRAND CROSS OF THE IMPERIAL BRAZILIAN ORDER OF THE CRUZERO; KNIGHT OF THE ROYAL ORDER OF THE SAVIOUR OF GRIiECE; AND OF THE ORDER OF MERIT OF CHILI, &C. &C. &C. IS DEDICATED, WITH MUCH EESPECT, BY HIS LOEDSHIP'S OBLIGED HUMBLE SEEVAIS'T, T LIVINGSTON MITCHELL. PREFACE. This translation is submitted to tlie public, as conveying- the Poet's meaning in tlie order of the versification, an undertaking of more difficulty in English, the terminations alone of verbs sufficing for good rhyme in Portuguese. In quantity the original varies as to the number of syllables—and in attempting an imitation in a different language—the employment of nearly as many cannot, he trusts, be objected to. Prom ten to twelve or even fourteen syllables occur in one line of the original, and thus, although ten syllables is the usual quantity in Ottava Rima when imitated in English—more has been required in translating here the lines of the Lusiad.
    [Show full text]
  • V.S. Lectures, No. 78 the TENTH ECLOGUE a Lecture Delivered to the Virgil Society 22Nd October 1966 by C.G
    V.S. Lectures, No. 78 THE TENTH ECLOGUE A lecture delivered to the Virgil Society 22nd October 1966 by C.G. Hardie, M.A. The Eclogues of Virgil are among the most puzzling poems that have come down to us from the ancient world. The Tenth is no easier to understand than the Fourth or the Sixth, and it has attracted much, though less special attention than, for instance, the linked problems of the First and Ninth, At a meeting of this Society, nine years ago, on the 19th October 1957, I spoke about the Fourth Eclogue (Lecture Summary No. 42) and six years ago, on 22nd October 1960, on the Sixth Eclogue (No. 50). I must begin today by making a rather different point about the Fourth Eclogue than I made then, and then proceed to say briefly much the same about the Sixth, repeating myself somewhat because Gallus in the Tenth cannot be understood without some theory of what Gallus means in the Sixth. The importance of the Fourth Eclogue in Virgil's development lies, in my opinion, in that the poet of the humble pastoral, the imitator of the Alexandrian school, the ’neoteric1 follower of Callimachus and Catullus, one of the 'cantores Euphorionis1" for the first time, in a moment of intense enthusiasm, conceived of himself as one day in the future called to be the Roman Homer. The climax of the Fourth Eclogue is not the growing up, the accession and the triumph of the child in unifying and pacifying the world, but the thought that Virgil will be the poet of this divine life and victory.
    [Show full text]
  • Callimachus's Acontius As an Elegiac Metanarrative in The
    Callimachus’s Acontius as an Elegiac Metanarrative in the Eclogues The love story of Acontius and Cydippe, which Calimachus adapted from the Coan historian Xenomedes to feature prominently in Aetia 3 (fr. 67–75), seems to have held special interest for the Latin poets of the 1st century BC. Vergil seems to adapt the narrative in Eclogues 2, 8, and especially 10 (Du Quesnay 1979, 48; Kenney 1983), and Propertius closely follows it in poem 1.18 (Cairns 1969). From the evidence of Eclogue 10 and Propertius’s Monobiblos, Ross and others have argued that Gallus used the stories of Acontius and Milanion as exempla for his own situation as an elegiac lover (Ross 1975, 89–91; Rosen & Farrell 1986), and Llewelyn Morgan has argued more recently that Gallus may have invested these stories with metapoetic innuendo (Morgan 1995). By Ovid’s day, Acontius and Cydippe were so well-known that their correspondence could be included among the Heroides, in terms, no less, that cast Acontius as the archetypal “elegiac hero”, i.e. as a prototypical elegiac poet (Barchiesi 1993, 360–363). This paper argues that Acontius functions as an archetypal elegiac figure in Vergil’s Eclogues just as he later does in Ovid’s Heroides, and that Vergil casts Callimachus’s love story as the metanarrative of Latin love elegy. In Eclogue 10 Vergil casts Gallus as the arch-bucolic singer Daphnis, familiar from Theocritus, and gives him a soliloquy in which he dramatizes the choice between pastoral and elegiac lifestyles (see Conte 1986, 100–129), ultimately expressing his preference for elegiac by vowing to imitate Acontius: certum est in silvis.
    [Show full text]
  • Metaliteracy & Theatricality in French & Italian Pastoral
    THE SHEPHERD‘S SONG: METALITERACY & THEATRICALITY IN FRENCH & ITALIAN PASTORAL by MELINDA A. CRO (Under the Direction of Francis Assaf) ABSTRACT From its inception, pastoral literature has maintained a theatrical quality and an artificiality that not only resonate the escapist nature of the mode but underscore the metaliterary awareness of the author. A popular mode of writing in antiquity and the middle ages, pastoral reached its apex in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries with works like Sannazaro‘s Arcadia, Tasso‘s Aminta, and Honoré d‘Urfé‘s Astrée. This study seeks to examine and elucidate the performative qualities of the pastoral imagination in Italian and French literature during its most popular period of expression, from the thirteenth to the seventeenth century. Selecting representative works including the pastourelles of Jehan Erart and Guiraut Riquier, the two vernacular pastoral works of Boccaccio, Sannazaro‘s Arcadia, Tasso‘s Aminta, and D‘Urfé‘s Astrée, I offer a comparative analysis of pastoral vernacular literature in France and Italy from the medieval period through the seventeenth century. Additionally, I examine the relationship between the theatricality of the works and their setting. Arcadia serves as a space of freedom of expression for the author. I posit that the pastoral realm of Arcadia is directly inspired not by the Greek mountainous region but by the Italian peninsula, thus facilitating the transposition of Arcadia into the author‘s own geographical area. A secondary concern is the motif of death and loss in the pastoral as a repeated commonplace within the mode. Each of these factors contributes to an understanding of the implicit contract that the author endeavors to forge with the reader, exhorting the latter to be active in the reading process.
    [Show full text]