DOCSLIB.ORG

Kerrier District Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kerrier District Council Appendix A KERRIER DISTRICT COUNCIL REPORT FOR: QUALITY LIVING ENVIRONMENT OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE – 10 January 2007 REPORT OF: JOINTLY: PRINCIPAL PLANNING OFFICER AND HEAD OF SERVICE – HOUSING - PART I 1 REVISION OF THE COUNCIL’S AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY. 1.1 SUMMARY This report is to update Members on the review of the Councils Affordable Housing Policy, including the results of the Affordable Housing Consultation Public Opinion Survey undertaken in August 2006 and the comments received from the formal stakeholder consultation undertaken in October 2006. The adoption of the recommendations arising from this process will amend the operational level policy for affordable housing and dictate the content of planning obligations sought to secure affordable housing. 1.2 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR THE COUNCIL There are no financial implications for the council arising directly from this report. Contained within current Portfolio Plan? No 1.3 OTHER IMPLICATIONS Legal: The implementation of the Policy through planning obligations. Failure to have sufficient regard to consultation responses will expose the Council to challenge Corporate Property: Council owned land may be considered to deliver some affordable housing schemes. Personnel/Trade Union: None. Overview and Scrutiny: Quality Living Environment. Sustainability: To provide sustainable, affordable homes. Community Safety: The schemes will be developed with regard to Community Safety, seeking advice from the Police Architectural Liaison Officer. Social Deprivation: To provide affordable homes. Local Strategic Partnership: To meet the LSP objective of increasing the supply of affordable and decent homes. Comprehensive Performance Assessment: To provide a balanced housing market. Communication/Public Relations: Parish and Town Councils will be consulted as schemes progress. Consultation has taken place with residents and stakeholders involved in the delivery of affordable housing. 79 E-Government: Using the West Cornwall Affordable Housing Marketplace to advertise new schemes explaining how residents can apply and the prices residents can expect to pay for an affordable dwelling. 1.3 REPORT We are not dealing with the Local Plan or LDF policies but rather the operational policy required to give effect to these higher level policies. In April 2005 Full Council adopted the current pricing structure within the affordable housing policy. The current policy states affordable homes delivered by private developers must be sold for no more than three times the average Cornish wage plus five percent. Using the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings 2005, this sales figure currently equates to £64,173. Since the adoption of this policy the Council’s Members and Officers have received numerous representations from developers, lenders and prospective purchasers to the effect that the policy will prevent the delivery of affordable housing rather than enable it. There are also restricted rent levels. At the same Full Council meeting Members requested that the Quality Living Environment Overview and Scrutiny Committee review the affordable housing policy and report their findings and recommendations back to Council. Following consideration of the entire policy the Panel determined that it was only the pricing structure that required immediate review, the other elements of the Policy being satisfactory. The Quality Living Environment Affordable Housing Review Panel visited a number of Local Authorities with similar housing affordability issues as Kerrier in order to review the success of their pricing structures and the delivery of affordable housing. In April 2006 the Quality Living Environment Overview and Scrutiny Committee (QLE) reported their findings back to Full Council. QLE recommended that the Council should formally consult both residents and stakeholders on a pricing structure based on the model adopted by Carrick District Council. Kerrier has consulted residents and stakeholders on the pricing structure: detailed in Appendix E. Consultation Exercise A thorough consultation exercise has been undertaken, which has included the following elements: 1. Face to face consultation with the public. This was undertaken on the Council’s behalf by PFA research and consisted of 428 interviews in three principle towns of Helston, Redruth and Camborne, with supplementary interviews conducted in Constantine, Lizard and Mullion, contributions from which were identified as lacking in the analysis of postcodes of interviewees in the three principle towns. The executive summary of this consultation is found in appendix D. 2. Consultation with Lenders. 60 lenders were sent the proposed guidance and the responses received can be found in Appendix B and any proposed amendments arising from these responses in Appendix A. 3. Consultation with Stakeholders, including developers, housebuilders, planning agents, GOSW and housing associations. 160 stakeholders were sent the proposed guidance and the responses received can be found in Appendix B and any proposed amendments arising from these responses in Appendix A. Members must have regard to the possibility that further investigation and consultation may be required. Members must also be clear that Planning Policy Statement 3: Housing (November 2006) has now been published and this will necessarily mean a further review of our higher level policies and those at an operational level. Further details on this will be given verbally at the meeting. This current proposal is therefore very much an interim measure. 80 1.4 FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY There are no financial issues for the Council arising directly from this report although the delivery of additional affordable housing will affect our ability to offer affordable housing options to those in housing need which could avoid the use of Bed and Breakfast, which has financial implications for the Council. 1.5 RISK ASSESSMENT The risk to the Council of having an affordable housing policy (at an operational level) which does not deliver affordable housing in Kerrier is that we may lose the opportunity to address housing need. A policy has to be economically viable for developers to progress development in Kerrier. The risk of having no restrictions in this area is that affordable housing development may actually be unaffordable to most people living in Kerrier. Risk Register Reference S4 Overall Risk Register Rating 12 Note: 1-8 Low/Moderate (Green) 9-15 High Risk (Amber) 16-25 Extreme (Red) Problems and Item Implications Mitigation Status Warnings 1 Failure to gain Failure to deliver Housing Enabling Amber planning permission officer works closely on individual schemes with RSLs and Planning to ensure proposed schemes are acceptable. 1.6 CONCLUSION The consultation exercise has shown that the document is generally sound and most responses have been positive. It is clear however that whilst this is accepted as an improvement on the previous policy position on the delivery of affordable housing, there should be an annual review of the policy (and any associated guidance) through the Annual Monitoring Report. 1.7 RECOMMENDATION That the Overview and Scrutiny Committee recommend to Council that the pricing structure in the operational affordable housing policy should be amended in line with the consultation and consultation responses and more particularly, the recommendations set out in Appendix A be adopted. Nicola Stinson, Principal Planning Officer Jane Barlow, Head of Service – Housing Background Papers. Appendix A – Consideration of Representation to Consultation Appendix B – Full representations Appendix C – List of Stakeholders Appendix D – Executive Summary of Affordable Housing Consultation Public Opinion Survey, August 2006. Appendix E – Consultation detail. (updated with 2006 figures). 81.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE LONDON GAZETTE, 27 OCTOBER, 1914. 8627 Said Appendix Were Substituted for the Afore- Caledonian Canal, and the Following Said Second Schedule
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 27 OCTOBER, 1914. 8627 said Appendix were substituted for the afore- Caledonian Canal, and the following said Second Schedule. parishes to the south and east of the Canal R. McKENNA, —Kilmallie: Kilmonivaig. One of His Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State. KlNCARDINESHIRE. Home Office, Whitehall. The whole county. 23 October, 1914. Ross AND CROMARTY. So much of the County, including the Western Islands, as is not already included in the list ADDITIONAL AREAS. of prohibited areas. ENGLAND. ESSEX. IRELAND. Rural Districts.—Romford (Civil Parishes of CORK. Cranham, Great Warley, Rainham, and The whole county. Wennington). KENT. KERRY. Municipal Borough.—Tenterden. The whole county. Rural Districts.—Tenterden : Cranbrook. APPENDIX. LINCOLNSHIRE. PROHIBITED AREAS. Municipal Borough.—Boston. Urban Districts.—Holbeach : Long Sutton: The following areas are prohibited areas in Spalding: Sutton Bridge. England:'— Rural Districts.—Boston: Crowland: East Elloe: Sibsey: Spalding. CHESHIRE. County Boroughs.—Birkenhead: Chester: NORFOLK. Wallasey. So much of the County as is not already in- Urban Districts.—Bromborough: Ellesmere cluded in the list of prohibited areas. Port and Whitby: Higher Bebington: Hoole: Hoylake and West Kirby: Lower NORTHUMBERLAND . Bebington: Neston and Parkgate: Runcorn. Municipal Borough.—Berwick-upon-Tweed. Rural Districts.—Chester (Civil Parishes of— Urban Districts.—Alnwick: Amble: Roth- Bache, Backford, Blacom cum Crabwall, bury. Bridge Trafford, C'apenhurst, Caughall, Rural Districts.—Alnwick: Belford : Glen- Chorlton by Backford, Croughton, Dunham- dale: Norham and Islandshires: Rothbury. on-the-Hill, Elton, Great Saughall, Haps- fo-rd, Hoole Village, Ince, Lea by Backford, SUFFOLK. Little Saughall, Little Stanney, Mickle So' much of the County as is not already in- Trafford, Mollington, Moston, Newton-by- cluded in the list of prohibited areas.
    [Show full text]
  • N No of Establishments Ot Yet Rated Fo Intervent
    Authority Total No of No of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total Total No of Total No Total No Total No of Total No of Total No of Total No of Total No of Total No of Establishments Establishments Broadly Broadly Broadly Broadly Broadly Broadly Interventions Interventions Interventions Interventions Interventions Interventions number of formal of formal of formal formal formal formal formal formal formal (inc unrated) not yet rated for compliant compliant compliant compliant compliant compliant achieved achieved - achieved - achieved - achieved - achieved - samples enforcement enforcem enforceme enforcement enforcement enforcemen enforceme enforcement enforcement intervention premises premises - A premises - B premises - C premises - D premises - E Premises Rated A Premises Rated B Premises Rated C Premises Rated D Premises Rated E taken actions taken ent nt actions actions taken actions taken t actions nt actions actions taken - actions taken - - actions taken - - Seizure, - taken - taken - Improvement Remedial Prosecutions taken - Voluntary dentention Suspension/r Emergency Prohibtion Notices Action & Simple closures and evocation of Prohibition Orders Detention Cautions surrender of approval Notices Notices food DISTRICT COUNCILS Adur 446 39 82.3% 0.0% 29.4% 81.9% 100.0% 100.0% 99.7% 100.0% 100.0% 99.4% 100.0% 100.0% 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 Allerdale 1332 77 92.0% 0.0% 46.7% 88.2% 97.1% 99.8% 90.4% 100.0% 97.6% 96.2% 93.9% 70.4% 59 0
    [Show full text]
  • Areas Designated As 'Rural' for Right to Buy Purposes
    Areas designated as 'Rural' for right to buy purposes Region District Designated areas Date designated East Rutland the parishes of Ashwell, Ayston, Barleythorpe, Barrow, 17 March Midlands Barrowden, Beaumont Chase, Belton, Bisbrooke, Braunston, 2004 Brooke, Burley, Caldecott, Clipsham, Cottesmore, Edith SI 2004/418 Weston, Egleton, Empingham, Essendine, Exton, Glaston, Great Casterton, Greetham, Gunthorpe, Hambelton, Horn, Ketton, Langham, Leighfield, Little Casterton, Lyddington, Lyndon, Manton, Market Overton, Martinsthorpe, Morcott, Normanton, North Luffenham, Pickworth, Pilton, Preston, Ridlington, Ryhall, Seaton, South Luffenham, Stoke Dry, Stretton, Teigh, Thistleton, Thorpe by Water, Tickencote, Tinwell, Tixover, Wardley, Whissendine, Whitwell, Wing. East of North Norfolk the whole district, with the exception of the parishes of 15 February England Cromer, Fakenham, Holt, North Walsham and Sheringham 1982 SI 1982/21 East of Kings Lynn and the parishes of Anmer, Bagthorpe with Barmer, Barton 17 March England West Norfolk Bendish, Barwick, Bawsey, Bircham, Boughton, Brancaster, 2004 Burnham Market, Burnham Norton, Burnham Overy, SI 2004/418 Burnham Thorpe, Castle Acre, Castle Rising, Choseley, Clenchwarton, Congham, Crimplesham, Denver, Docking, Downham West, East Rudham, East Walton, East Winch, Emneth, Feltwell, Fincham, Flitcham cum Appleton, Fordham, Fring, Gayton, Great Massingham, Grimston, Harpley, Hilgay, Hillington, Hockwold-Cum-Wilton, Holme- Next-The-Sea, Houghton, Ingoldisthorpe, Leziate, Little Massingham, Marham, Marshland
    [Show full text]
  • Relevant Reference Projects Date: 26/10/2009
    E-vote 2011 Version: 1.0 Relevant Reference Projects Date: 26/10/2009 E-vote 2011 Relevant Reference Projects Project: E-vote 2011 E-vote 2011 Version: 1.0 Relevant Reference Projects Date: 26/10/2009 Change log Version Date Author Description/changes 1.0 Producer: Computas, Acando, Cybernetica and OPT2VOTE Page 1 E-vote 2011 Version: 1.0 Relevant Reference Projects Date: 26/10/2009 CONTENT 1. REFERENCE PROJECT 1 – LARGE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN NORWEGIAN PUBLIC SECTOR 3 2. REFERENCE PROJECT 2 – OPEN SOURCE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN NORWEGIAN PUBLIC SECTOR 6 3. REFERENCE PROJECT 3 – E-VOTING DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE PROJECT 10 4. REFERENCE PROJECT 4 – ELECTORAL MODERNISATION PILOT PROJECT 2007 11 5. REFERENCE PROJECT 5 – ELECTORAL MODERNISATION PILOT PROJECT 2003 15 Producer: Computas, Acando, Cybernetica and OPT2VOTE Page 2 E-vote 2011 Version: 1.0 Relevant Reference Projects Date: 26/10/2009 1. Reference project 1 – Large development project in Norwegian public sector CUSTOMER NAME: The Norwegian Food Safety Authorities PROJECT NAME: MATS PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Mattilsynet (The Norwegian Food Safety Authorities) was established the 1st of January 2004 replacing a number of public inspection authorities such as: • Statens Næringsmiddeltilsyn • Local Næringsmiddeltilsyn • Statens dyrehelsetilsyn • Statens Landbrukstilsyn • The Seafood department in Fiskeridirektoratet Before the process of procuring a new IT system was initiated, Mattilsynet used 40 different systems originating from the 5 inspection authorities before the merge. It was necessary with a reconstruction of the IT system portfolio to make an efficient tool for the new inspection authority. Computas was selected to deliver the new system solution to Mattilsynet. Project objectives The objectives of Mattilsynet were amongst others: • Develop a new system to support business critical processes for inspection • Replace legacy systems and develop required functionality in the new system.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Parking Enforcement
    Civil Parking Enforcement Cornwall Council Annual Parking Report April 2009 – March 2010 August 2010 Transportation Service Civil Parking Enforcement Annual Parking Report April 2009 – March 2010 Introduction 3 Policy 3 Structure 4 Finance 4 Results 5 Future 7 Civil Parking Enforcement Annual Parking Report April 2009 – March 2010 2 August 2010 Introduction On 5 May 2008 the Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (County of Cornwall) Designation Order 2008 came in to force. Responsibility for enforcing on street parking restrictions passed from the police to the then Cornwall County Council. During 2008/09 the County Council carried out enforcement in conjunction with Carrick District Council and Restormel Borough Council (the other district councils refused the County Council’s invitation to participate in Civil Parking Enforcement (CPE)) the resulting structure was as follows: CPE organisation in Cornwall 2008/09 Authority Area Covered Carrick District Council Carrick – on and off street parking Restormel Borough Council Restormel – on and off street parking Cornwall County Council Penwith, Kerrier, Caradon and North Cornwall – on street parking only During 2009/10, although Cornwall was a unitary authority, the 2008 Designation Order did not allow for CPE in the car parks of Penwith, Kerrier, Caradon and North Cornwall so therefore parking enforcement continued to operate as it had in 2008/09. This report provides information on the CPE operation and gives a brief outline of the future of parking in Cornwall. Policy Enforcement objectives are compatible with those of The Local Transport Plan (LTP):- • To reduce congestion, and thereby • To improve air quality • To maximise safety • To support economic regeneration These objectives formed the basis for determining enforcement priorities and levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authority District Codes
    UK Data Archive Study Number 6028 - British Household Panel Survey, Waves 1-18, 1991-2009: Conditional Access, Local Authority District Codes British Household Panel Survey, waves 1-18 (1991-2009) User Documentation: Local Authority District Codes (LADISTC) 05 November 2008 For more information contact: Birgitta Rabe [email protected] ++44-1206-874594 Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex Wivenhoe Park Colchester Essex CO4 3SQ Local Authority District Codes (wLADISTC) The local authority districts within the database are aggregated if their population falls below 120,000. This aggregation is on the same basis as that for the Census Sample of Anonymised (Individual) Records, and the codes used are the same as those given in Marsh, C. and Teague, A. 'Samples of anonymised records from the 1991 Census', Population Trends, 69, 17-26, 1992. Note that, for wLADISTC, only codes up to 278 are relevant. 1: City; Westminster 53: Newcastle upon Tyne 2: Camden 54: North Tyneside 3: Hackney 55: South Tyneside 4: Hammersmith & Fulham 56: Sunderland 5: Haringey 57: Birmingham 6: Islington 58: Coventry 7: Kensington & Chelsea 59: Dudley 8: Lambeth 60: Sandwell 9: Lewisham 61: Solihull 10: Newham 62: Walsall 11: Southwark 63: Wolverhampton 12: Tower Hamlets 64: Bradford 13: Wandsworth 65: Calderdale 14: Barking and Dagenham 66: Kirklees 15: Barnet 67: Leeds 16: Bexley 68: Wakefield 17: Brent 69: Bath; Kingswood; Wansdyke 18: Bromley 70: Bristol 19: Croydon 71: Northavon 20: Ealing 72: Woodspring 21: Enfield 73: Luton 22: Greenwich
    [Show full text]
  • Year Dog Friendly Beaches
    COUNCIL OFFICES If you have any queries or comments to make on the dog bans listed or any related matters please telephone the appropriate Council: CARADON DISTRICTCOUNCIL 01579 341000 CARRICK DISTRICT COUNCIL 01872 224400 KERRIER DISTRICT COUNCIL 01209 614000 Photo: Gyllyngvase Beach, Paul Watts NORTH CORNWALL DISTRICT COUNCIL 01208 893333 PENWITH DISTRICT COUNCIL 01736 362341 RESTORMEL BOROUGH COUNCIL 01726 223300 DOG OWNERS CORNWALL 6 BEACH GUIDE FOR 5 i BUDE Widemouth Bay 4 Boscastle i 2 3 BEACHES ON WHICH DOG BANS APPLY Tintagel i Dog bans apply on the following beaches from Easter Day to 1st October unless stated* 1 North i LAUNCESTON Port Isaac Cornwall Caradon Penwith i 1 Cawsand Beach 1 Perranuthnoe PADSTOW Polzeath CAMELFORD 2 Portwrinkle Beach 2 Marazion (Chapel Rock to Long Rock i 3 Millendreath Beach *all year ban Level Crossing) - 2 Rock 4 East Looe Beach *all year ban 3 Penzance Promenade (to Lariggan River) 4 Mousehole *all year ban in harbour Pentire i Carrick 5 Porthcurno - 2 Watergate WADEBRIDGE 1 Tattams Beach 6 Sennen Cove (including harbour) - 2 Bay Bedruthan 2 Porth Beach 7 Porthmeor - 2 Steps BODMIN i Photo: Gyllyngvase Beach, Paul Watts i LISKEARD 3 Summers Beach 8 Porthgwidden 10 9 11 4 Tavern Beach 9 St. Ives Harbour 5 Castle Beach 10 Porthminster - 2 i Caradon 6 Gyllyngvase Beach - 2 11 Carbis Bay - 2 NEWQUAY LOSTWITHIEL i SALTASH 7 Swanpool Beach 12 Hayle Towans (from Hayle River to Restormel 8 Maenporth Beach Black Cliffs) - 2 10 Holywell i i 9 Porthtowan Beach - 2 13 Gwithian (Ceres Rock to Red River) - 2 Perranporth ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Authority No. Dppos Alnwick District Council 2 Alnwick - 10/08/2007, Amble - 10/08/2007
    The following table outlines those authorities that have published Designation Orders as at 1st November 2010. Please note that if you require full name of roads in an area, you should contact the relevant council office. Authority No. DPPOs Alnwick District Council 2 Alnwick - 10/08/2007, Amble - 10/08/2007. Amber Valley Borough 13 Belper - 24/05/2004, Oakerthorpe - 24/05/2004, Ripley and Heanor - 16/07/2004, Belper Railway Station - 24/01/2005, Council Church St Recreation Ground, Danesby Rise Recreation Ground, Denby Institute Recreation Ground, Denby - 05/12/2005, Festival Gardens, Belper - 22/06/2006, Kilburn - 08/09/2006, John Flamstead Memorial Park, Denby - 06/08/2007, Somercotes and Leabrooks - 06/08/2007, Belper Park - 06/12/2007, Heanor, various - 29/08/2008, Swanwick - 18/09/2009, Aldercar Rec Ground, Queen Street Rec Ground, Footpath between Queen Street and Acorn Centre - 16/07/2010. Isle of Anglesey County 3 Holyhead Town - 01/02/2005, Town of Llangefni - 15/12/2005, Menai Bridge Town - 01/08/2007. Council Arun District Council 1 Bognor Regis and Littlehampton, various - 01/06/2006. Aylesbury Vale District 2 Aylesbury various - 31/07/2008, Winslow and Steeple Claydon - 29/05/2009 Council Barking & Dagenham 2 Barking Town centre - 20/12/2004, Rainham Road South - 24/11/2008. Borough Council, London Borough of Barnet Borough Council, 3 North Finchley Town Centre - 01/03/2004, Hendon Central - 01/03/2004, Finchley Church End Town Centre - 01/03/2004. London Borough of Barnsley Metropolitan 15 Wombwell Town Centre - 03/04/2004,
    [Show full text]
  • Kerrier District Council Election Results 1973-2007
    Kerrier District Council Election Results 1973-2007 Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher The Elections Centre Plymouth University The information contained in this report has been obtained from a number of sources. Election results from the immediate post-reorganisation period were painstakingly collected by Alan Willis largely, although not exclusively, from local newspaper reports. From the mid- 1980s onwards the results have been obtained from each local authority by the Elections Centre. The data are stored in a database designed by Lawrence Ware and maintained by Brian Cheal and others at Plymouth University. Despite our best efforts some information remains elusive whilst we accept that some errors are likely to remain. Notice of any mistakes should be sent to [email protected]. The results sequence can be kept up to date by purchasing copies of the annual Local Elections Handbook, details of which can be obtained by contacting the email address above. Front cover: the graph shows the distribution of percentage vote shares over the period covered by the results. The lines reflect the colours traditionally used by the three main parties. The grey line is the share obtained by Independent candidates while the purple line groups together the vote shares for all other parties. Rear cover: the top graph shows the percentage share of council seats for the main parties as well as those won by Independents and other parties. The lines take account of any by- election changes (but not those resulting from elected councillors switching party allegiance) as well as the transfers of seats during the main round of local election.
    [Show full text]
  • The Statistical Bias Against Unitary Counties
    THE STATISTICAL BIAS AGAINST UNITARY COUNTIES How local government reorganisation has hidden deprivation and threatens to strip authorities of funding Steve Fothergill and Tony Gore Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research Sheffield Hallam University Final report October 2011 This report has been funded by Durham County Council. An additional input of Prof Fothergill’s time was provided by the Industrial Communities Alliance, the all-party association of local authorities in Britain’s industrial areas. 1 Contents Summary 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE REPORT The nature of the problem The report 2. THE AVAILABILITY OF STATISTICS The authorities affected by reorganisation Review of published data Data availability: some conclusions 3. THE IMPACT ON THE MEASUREMENT OF DISADVANTAGE A working method Indices of Deprivation DWP benefits data The impact: an assessment 4. A SPECIAL CASE? The counter-argument The scale of the new unitary counties Why size matters Special case: an assessment 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS An unintended by-product of reorganisation Recommendations 2 Summary The reorganisation of local government in parts of England in 2009 has created a statistical anomaly. Whereas data for 36 former district councils is now being discontinued, figures continue to be produced for 201 districts within the surviving two-tier counties. This threatens to hide deprivation in the new unitary counties and, in turn, to erode the likelihood that some of these unitary counties will benefit from funding streams that target areas of disadvantage. This could develop into a major, on-going problem. It would be astonishing if, in the long run, statistics for local disadvantage did not continue to guide policy and funding even though current area-based initiatives are being run down.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Network Member Electoral Division Organisation / Project
    Community Electoral Organisation / Grant Member Grant Description Year Network Division Project Amount Helston & Mullion & Mullion Methodist 12th Annual Rule C £250.00 2018/19 South Kerrier Grade-Ruan Church Scarecrow Festival Penwith Helston & Furry Youth Café Thomas M Helston North Community £400.00 2018/19 South Kerrier Hoodies Development Trust Helston & Thomas M Helston North Helston Makes It! Helston Makes It! £250.00 2018/19 South Kerrier Helston & Martin J Helston South Helston Makes It! Helston Makes It! £250.00 2018/19 South Kerrier Breage, Godolphin Cross Mobile climbing Helston & Keeling J Germoe & Community wall for Godolphin £400.00 2018/19 South Kerrier Sithney Association Cross Village Fete Penwith Helston & Furry Youth Café Martin J Helston South Community £200.00 2018/19 South Kerrier paddle baording Development Trust Penwith Paddleboarding Helston & Porthleven and Wallis A Community and consultation £200.00 2018/19 South Kerrier Helston West Development Trust event Plastic Free - Surf Helston & Surf Life Saving Life Saving Thomas M Helston North £50.00 2018/19 South Kerrier GB Championships 2018 Breage, Painting of the Helston & Lowertown Keeling J Germoe & Lowertown Book £300.00 2018/19 South Kerrier Community Group Sithney Box Breage, Helston & St Hilary School Outdoor play Keeling J Germoe & £100.00 2018/19 South Kerrier PTA equipment Sithney Helston & Mullion & Mullion Christmas Mullion Laser Rule C £202.20 2018/19 South Kerrier Grade-Ruan Lights Lights Helston & Helston Bowling Kitchen Martin J Helston South £300.00
    [Show full text]
  • Study 5001 - Cornish Parish Records: West Penwith and Kerrier, 1580-2002
    Study 5001 - Cornish Parish Records: West Penwith and Kerrier, 1580-2002 This document has been produced by AHDS History Introduction This resource represents a transcription of baptisms, marriages and burials from parish records from the West Penwith and Kerrier areas of Cornwall. The transcriptions cover from West Penwith the parishes of Gulval, Isle of Scilly, Madron, Marazion, Paul, Pendeen, Perranuthnoe, Newlyn St Peter, St Just, St Levan, St Hilary, St Michael’s Mount, Sancreed, Sennen and from Kerrier the parishes of Coverack, Cury, Germoe, Gunwalloe, Helston, Landewednack, Mannacan, Mawgan Meneage, Mullion, Ruan Major, Ruan Minor, St Anthony in Meneage, St Keverne, St Martin in Meneage. Field Descriptions The use of “?” indicates areas of uncertainity. Bapt_kerrier_1580_1903.tab Field Field Description parish Parish surname Surname of baptised birth_date Baptised data of birth bapt_date Day and month of baptism bapt_year Year of baptism name Given name of baptised relationship Son, daughter, illegitimate and so on father Father’s given name mother Mother’s given name status Esquire, gentleman, Mr and so on abode Place of residence occupation Fathers occupation (?) comment Additional comments mges_kerrier_1597_1836.tab Field Field Description parish Parish surname_male Groom’s Surname surname_female Bride’s surname date Day and month of marriage year Year of Marriage banns Banns or Licence mark_sign_male Signed or marked (by groom (?)) given_name_male Groom’s given name surname_male_1 Groom’s surname (repeated information (?))
    [Show full text]