DOCSLIB.ORG

MHMP 2014 UPDATE PART 3 II a Technological Industrial Hazards

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MHMP 2014 UPDATE PART 3 II a Technological Industrial Hazards II. Technological Hazards A. Industrial Hazards The following outline summarizes the significant industrial hazards covered in this section: 1. Fires a. Structural Fires b. Scrap Tire Fires 2. Hazardous Material Incidents a. Hazardous Material Incidents – Fixed Site (including industrial accidents) b. Nuclear Power Plant Emergencies c. Hazardous Material Incidents – Transportation d. Petroleum and Natural Gas Pipeline Accidents e. Oil and Natural Gas Well Accidents This section covers many related types of events that stem from breakdowns or weaknesses in industry and the built environment. The starting section, structural fires, considers various types of large fires that occur in the midst of important buildings or structures. Since a frequent cause of structural fires involves natural gas explosions, the chapters involving natural gas (pipelines and wells) appear nearby, to make easier a more thorough reading about this shared source of risk. Although small residential fires are common, and can be the cause of larger urban conflagrations, this hazard analysis focuses in particular on those larger-scale fires that have greater potential to affect an entire community—either through a fire’s sheer magnitude or through the vital nature of the facilities or resources it affects. For this 2014 edition of the Michigan Hazard Mitigation Plan, new consideration and detail is provided for “urban conflagrations” in which dense urban development may allow fires to spread over many blocks, or even the entire core of the built-up area. Scrap tire fires are a special case of industrial hazard, for although they do not typically affect a specific structure, these types of fires do involve toxic smoke and chemical residues that have more in common with hazardous material incidents than with ordinary residential and wildfire events. The following chapters, specifically dealing with hazardous material incidents, cover a wide array of extremely hazardous substances across diverse situations that typically involve industrial or warehousing operations. The section on fixed site incidents includes a consideration of fire-related industrial accidents and explosions, even if these did not involve extremely hazardous substances. Again, the emphasis is on events of a relatively large magnitude—those that resulted in community states of emergency, evacuations, impairment or loss of economically significant or critical facilities, or multiple casualties. A separate chapter deals with nuclear power plant emergencies, and then consideration is given to various forms of transportation incidents that may involve hazardous materials, including separate chapters about pipeline infrastructure and wells that have been dug for production purposes. Overlap Between Industrial Hazards and Other Sections of the Hazard Analysis Various types of structural, scrap tire, and industrial fires and incidents may stem from deliberate actions, rather than accidental causes. In such cases, the incidents tie in with the terrorism and civil disturbance chapters, in the Human-Related hazards section of the hazard analysis. Large scale disaster events may also cause these types of fires to occur—lightning strikes have actually caused the direct ignition of structural fires, and the destruction caused by tornados can lead to fires as well. Wildfires have a clear potential to ignite structures, and may also come to involve scrap tire storage areas. Although the chances are slim, earthquakes and celestial impact events might also result in the occurrence of structural or industrial fires. There might be certain conditions under which infrastructure failures are connected with fires. An indirect link also exists between extreme temperatures and winter weather, as various means of heating indoor areas have been known to increase fire risks. A major transportation incident has the potential to start a fire, and certain kinds of catastrophic incidents (such as nuclear attack) would certainly create fires. 293 Technological Hazards – Industrial (Introduction) A structural fire involving one or more critical facilities has the potential to cause infrastructure failures, energy emergencies, flooding, wildfires, dam failures, transportation accidents, and nuclear power plant emergencies. Hazardous materials incidents of any type (including scrap tire fires) may lead to public health emergencies if they are large enough, or if the involved substances are hazardous enough. If a fire or hazardous materials incident stems from some sort of systematic official negligence then there may be a potential for civil disturbance or sabotage/terrorism to take place. 294 Technological Hazards – Industrial (Introduction) STRUCTURAL FIRES A fire, of any origin, that ignites one or more structures, causing loss of life and/or property. Hazard Description and Analysis In terms of average annual loss of life and property, structural fires—often referred to as the “universal hazard” because they occur in virtually every community—are by far the most common hazard facing most communities in Michigan and across the country. Each year in the United States, fires result in approximately 5,000 deaths and 25,000 injuries requiring medical treatment. According to some sources, structural fires cause more property damage and loss of life than all types of natural disasters combined. Direct property losses due to fire exceed $9 billion per year, and much of that figure is the result of structural fires. In 2008 alone, there were 3,320 civilian deaths and 16,705 civilian injuries as a result of fire in the United States, along with 118 firefighters killed while on duty. There were an estimated 1.5 million fires in 2008, and direct property loss due to fires was estimated at $15.5 billion. This figure includes the 2008 California wildfires, with estimated losses of $1.4 billion. There were 515,000 structure fires in the United States in 2008 that resulted in 2,900 civilian deaths, 14,960 civilian injuries, and $12.4 billion in property damage. Every 22 seconds, a fire department responds to a fire somewhere in the nation. A fire occurs in a structure at the rate of one every 61 seconds, and in particular a residential fire occurs every 78 seconds. Nationwide, there is a civilian fire injury every 31 minutes. In 2008, structure fires represented 34% of the total fires across the United States. Unfortunately, although the United States has made great strides in lessening deaths and injuries caused by other types of disasters, structural fires are worse problems in this country than in many other industrialized countries (even those with a more densely-developed population pattern). The United States Centers for Disease Control (CDC) figures indicate that fire-associated mortality rates in the United States are approximately 2-3 times greater than those in many other developed countries. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s National Fire Data Center, residential fires represent 78% of all structural fires and cause 80% of all fire fatalities. Approximately 83% of those fatalities occur in single-family homes and duplexes. Perhaps the most tragic statistic of all is that over 40% of residential fires and 60% of residential fatalities occur in homes with no smoke alarms. (Studies have repeatedly shown that a working smoke alarm dramatically increases a person’s chance of surviving a fire.) Michigan’s fire experience generally mirrors the national fire situation. According to statistics compiled by the Fire Marshal Division of the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs for 2003, nearly 19,000 structural fires occurred in Michigan, resulting in 161 deaths and 624 injuries. The dollar loss for all fires was estimated at over $230 million. The Fire Marshal Division estimated that a structural fire occurred in Michigan about every 28 minutes in 2003. Michigan’s fire death rate of 15.4 persons per million puts it toward the middle of all states in the nation in 2006. As the following table indicates, Michigan is ranked 19th in terms of fire deaths per million population. Michigan’s fire death rate is ranked third in the Midwest, behind Missouri and Indiana as of 2007. During the period from 1975-2009, the number of reported fires in Michigan (both structural and nonstructural) has trended downwards from a high of just over 80,000 to the current low of around 40,000, with yearly numbers fluctuating within this range. The number of structural fires represents approximately 35-40% of those yearly totals. Although fire risks are clearly a major concern, most of the incidents are of a limited scale and do not threaten or harm an entire community. This analysis will focus on major fires that do cause a severe impact to local communities—as disaster events. 295 Technological Hazards – Industrial (Fire Hazards – Structural Fires) Fire Death Rate per Million Population: 2007 Fire Fire Fire State State State Rate Rate Rate District/ Columbia 39.2 Indiana 15.6 Wyoming 9.6 Mississippi 28.4 Michigan 15.4 Montana 9.4 Arkansas 26.0 Vermont 14.5 Connecticut 9.2 Alaska 25.1 Nevada 14.4 Washington 8.8 Oklahoma 24.9 Illinois 14.2 Iowa 8.7 West Virginia 24.8 Delaware 13.9 Idaho 8.7 Louisiana 23.8 Virginia 13.3 Minnesota 8.7 Alabama 22.6 Wisconsin 12.7 Colorado 8.3 Tennessee 22.5 Ohio 12.5 California 8.2 Missouri 20.1 Nebraska 12.4 Arizona 7.9 North Carolina 19.5 Utah 11.6 New Jersey 7.5 Pennsylvania 19.2 South Dakota 11.3 Massachusetts 6.9 Georgia 18.8 Texas 11.2 Maine 6.8 Kentucky 18.6 New Mexico 11.2 New
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chemical Accident Prevention & Preparedness
    Lessons Learned Bulletin No. 5 Chemical Accident Prevention & Preparedness Major accidents involving fertilizers The aim of the bulletin is to provide insights on lessons learned from accident reported in the European Major Accident Reporting System (eMARS) and other accident sources for both industry operators and government regulators. In future the CAPP Lessons Learned Bulletin will be produced on a semi-annual basis. Each issue of the Bulletin focuses on a particular theme. Accident 1 Summary Wholesale and retail storage and distribution In preparing this bulletin, 25 major accidents in eMARS involving fertiliz- Sequence of events was to attack the source of the fire with ers were studied together with an ad- portable fire extinguishers, in the absence ditional 25 accidents from other free A fire occurred in a warehouse storing fer- of activated fire hose reels. Arriving on sources, including also accidents in tilizers and chemical products belonging the site, firemen observed that very thick transport. Events were chosen on the to a wholesale distributor of numerous smoke was emitted from the storage basis that ammonium nitrate or NPK products, including sugar, molasses, fer- compartment. It also appeared that a fertilizer (nitrogen-phosphorus-potas- tilizers, and cereals. The storage instal- fire was burning beneath the mass. How- sium) was involved in the accident. lation was subdivided into 8 compart- ever, the intervention of the firefighters ments of which two contained NPK (15% appeared to focus solely on the presence In general, with some exceptions, N, 8% P, 22% K) fertilizers in quantities of ammonium nitrate fertilizer, ignoring, most accidents occurred in ware- of 600 tonnes and 850 tonnes respec- the nature of the other chemical prod- houses or general chemicals manu- tively.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Pollution and Increased Safety Risks to Workers and Nearby Residents
    1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Written by Ari Phillips with analysis from Courtney Bernhardt and Gabriel Clark-Leach of the Environmental Integrity Project. THE ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT The Environmental Integrity Project (http://www.environmentalintegrity.org) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization established in March of 2002 by former EPA enforcement attorneys to advocate for effective enforcement of environmental laws. EIP has three goals: 1) to provide objective analyses of how the failure to enforce or implement environmental laws increases pollution and affects public health; 2) to hold federal and state agencies, as well as individual corporations, accountable for failing to enforce or comply with environmental laws; and 3) to help local communities obtain the protection of environmental laws. CONTACTS: For questions about this report, please contact: Tom Pelton, Environmental Integrity Project, (202) 888- 2703 or [email protected] PHOTO CREDITS: Cover Image: The ExxonMobil Baytown Olefin’s plant fire sends a toxic brew of chemicals into the sky on July 31, 2019. Thirty-seven people experienced minor injuring from the explosion, which occurred at a part of the facility where plastics are made. Photo by the Associated Press, used with permission. Page 1: Houston industrial district, Shutterstock. Page 4: Petrochemical complex, La Porte, Texas, by Roy Luck/Flickr. Page 8: Assessment units for the Wolfcamp Shale and Bone Spring Formation of the Delaware Basin, USGS. 2 Plastics Pollution on the Rise Executive Summary hat the word ‘plastic’ means pliable or easily shaped is deceiving. Over the last 50 years plastic has developed a stranglehold over us, with no sign of loosening up. It is T hard to imagine life without plastic: The versatile material is found in computers, phones, medical devices, packaging, and thousands of other products.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk and Safety Management of Ammonium Nitrate Fertilizers: Keeping the Memory of Disasters Alive
    32 | Loss Prevention Bulletin 251 October 2016 Incident Risk and safety management of ammonium nitrate fertilizers: keeping the memory of disasters alive Dr. Zsuzsanna Gyenes, EC Joint Research Centre, Italy; Nicolas Dechy, CHAOS association, France This paper is aimed at keeping the memory of disasters alive, with the new process had fractions with higher ammonium assuming that risk awareness and implementation of safety nitrate (AN) content and this inhomogeneous mass was stored measures are facilitated by case histories. There have been together with the ASN that was dried with the old process. several accidents and a few disasters in the ammonium nitrate Due to higher AN content, lower density, lower water content fertilizer industry, and it is worthwhile to review these from (reduction from 4% to 2% with the new technique) and time to time, beyond the regulation and practice changes changed crystalline structure, the accumulated fine fraction which they triggered. was explosive. In addition, the operational issue was that the storage in large quantity lead to caking. The anti-caking BASF plant, Oppau, 1921 procedure at that time was to use dynamite! It was repeated over 20,000 times with no large explosion before that day. On 21 September in 1921, two consecutive explosions Similar risky procedures were at the origin of other accidents occurred in a silo in the BASF plant in Oppau, Germany, in Kriewald in Germany in 1921 (26 July)25 and Tessenderlo in creating a 20m deep, 90x125m large crater. The entire area Belgium in 1942 (29 April)26. was covered by dark green smoke and there were several additional fires and small explosions.
    [Show full text]
  • BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Wildfire Prevention
    BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Wildfire Prevention January 2008 2007-0022 2100, 350 – 7th Ave. S.W. 403, 235 Water Street Calgary, Alberta St. John’s, Newfoundland Canada T2P 3N9 Canada A1C 1B6 Tel (403) 267-1100 Tel (709) 724-4200 Fax (403) 261-4622 Fax (709) 724-4225 Email: [email protected] Website: www.capp.ca The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) represents 140 companies that explore for, develop and produce natural gas, natural gas liquids, crude oil, oil sands, and elemental sulphur throughout Canada. CAPP member companies produce more than 97 per cent of Canada’s natural gas and crude oil. CAPP also has 125 associate members that provide a wide range of services that support the upstream crude oil and natural gas industry. Together, these members and associate members are an important part of a $65-billion-a-year national industry that affects the livelihoods of more than half a million Canadians. CAPP engaged QSI Quality Service Investigations Inc. (QSI) to develop Best Management Practices for Wildfire Prevention for the upstream oil and gas industry. QSI assembled a team of experts with numerous years of experience and training in wildland fire management. The Team members are: Bill Bereska, Dennis Quintilio, Murray Heinrich and Kelly O’Shea. Throughout the development of this document, QSI worked with members of the Industrial Wildfire Prevention Working Group who reviewed the document and provided comments and suggestions. CAPP wishes to acknowledge the interest and support from these members and from other stakeholders whose joint efforts have helped make this a more useful document for all.
    [Show full text]
  • The Texas City Disaster
    National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center HAZMAT HISTORY The Texas City Disaster The National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center offers Hazmat History as an avenue for responders to learn from the past and apply those lessons learned to future incidents for a more successful outcome. This coincides with the overarching mission of the Fusion Center – to improve hazmat responder safety and enhance the decision‐making process during pre‐planning and mitigation of hazmat incidents. Incident Details: Insert Location and Date Texas City, TX April 16, 1947 Hazardous Material Involved Ammonium Nitrate Fertilizer Type (mode of transportation, fixed facility) Cargo Ship Overview The morning of 16 April 1947 dawned clear and crisp, cooled by a brisk north wind. Just before 8 am, longshoremen removed the hatch covers on Hold 4 of the French Liberty ship Grandcamp as they prepared to load the remainder of a consignment of ammonium nitrate fertilizer. Some 2,086 mt (2,300 t) were already onboard, 798 (880) of which were in the lower part of Hold 4. The remainder of the ship's cargo consisted of large balls of sisal twine, peanuts, drilling equipment, tobacco, cotton, and a few cases of small ammunition. No special safety precautions were in focus at the time. Several longshoremen descended into the hold and waited for the first pallets holding the 45 kg (100 lb) packages to be hoisted from dockside. Soon thereafter, someone smelled smoke, a plume was observed rising between the cargo holds and the ship’s hull, apparently about seven or eight layers of sacks down. Neither a 3.8 L (1 gal) jug of drinking water nor the contents of two fire extinguishers supplied by crew members seemed to do much good.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Dynamics and Forensic Analysis of Liquid Fuel Fires
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Fire Dynamics and Forensic Analysis of Liquid Fuel Fires Author: Christopher L. Mealy, Matthew E. Benfer, Daniel T. Gottuk Document No.: 238704 Date Received: May 2012 Award Number: 2008-DN-BX-K168 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. FIRE DYNAMICS AND FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF LIQUID FUEL FIRES Final Report Grant No. 2008-DN-BX-K168 Prepared by: Christopher L. Mealy, Matthew E. Benfer, and Daniel T. Gottuk Hughes Associates, Inc. 3610 Commerce Drive, Suite 817 Baltimore, MD 21227 Ph. 410-737-8677 FAX 410-737-8688 February 18, 2011 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Loss Prevention Bulletin Improving Process Safety by Sharing Experience
    Loss Prevention Bulletin Improving process safety by sharing experience Disaster 1916 Issue 251, October 2016 Anniversaries The great explosion of 1916 1986 Fire and explosion of LPG tanks at Feyzin 1966 Seveso – 40 years on 1986 Chernobyl – 1976 30 years on The Sandoz warehouse fi re – 30 years on The Challenger Space Shuttle disaster Risk and safety management of ammonium nitrate fertilizers 1921 1986 LPBcover251.indd 1 30/09/2016 14:25 I C h e m E S a f e t e ISC y r t n C e IChemE safety training October – December 2016 IChemE offers a range of training courses to help you, Fundamentals of Process Safety your staff and your organisation improve safety and 10–14 Oct, Melbourne, Australia www.icheme.org/fpsmel reduce risk. Comprehensive Explosion Science 11–12 Oct, London, UK All IChemE training courses can be run in-company. www.icheme.org/ces Email [email protected] for a quotation. Gas Explosion Hazards on LNG Facilities 13–14 Oct, London, UK Visit www.icheme.org/courses to view all IChemE www.icheme.org/lng training courses. Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) 25–26 Oct, Boksburg, South Africa Register for any course at www.icheme.org/booking www.icheme.org/lopasa Fundamentals of Nuclear Safety 31 Oct–4 Nov, Preston, UK www.icheme.org/fns Fundamentals of Process Safety Management 7–11 Nov, Boksburg, South Africa www.icheme.org/fpsm Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) 8–9 Nov, Cork, Ireland www.icheme.org/lopa Human Factors in Health and Safety 16–17 Nov, Melbourne, Australia www.icheme.org/humanfactors Layer of Protection Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf | 370.95 Kb
    Japan Earthquake and Tsunami Update Monday, March 14, 2011 Note: New content has been inserted in red, italicized, bold font. Overview A powerful 8.9-magnitude earthquake hit Japan on Friday (March 11) (the earthquake has since been upgraded to 9.0 magnitude by Japan’s Meteorological Agency) at 1446 local time (0546 GMT), unleashing massive tsunami waves that crashed into Japan’s eastern coast of Honshu, the largest and main island of Japan, resulting in widespread damage and destruction. According to the Government of Japan (GoJ) as of Monday (March 14), at 1 least 1,647 people are confirmed dead, 1,990 people are injured and some 10,000 people are reported to be missing, the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) reported. The UN says that it is expected that the numbers are likely to increase as emergency teams begin to reach some affected areas . The earthquake sparked widespread tsunami warnings across the Pacific that stretched from Japan to North and South America. According to the US Geological Survey (USGS), the shallow quake struck at a depth of six miles (10 km) (20 km deep according to Japan’s Meteorological Agency), around 80 miles (125 km) off the eastern coast of Japan, and 240 miles (380 km) northeast of Tokyo. It was reportedly the largest recorded quake in Japan’s history and the fifth largest in the world since 1900. The quake was also felt in Japan’s capital city, Tokyo, located hundreds of miles from the epicenter and was also felt as far away as the Chinese capital Beijing, some 1,500 miles away.
    [Show full text]
  • Miyagi Prefecture Is Blessed with an Abundance of Natural Beauty and Numerous Historic Sites. Its Capital, Sendai, Boasts a Popu
    MIYAGI ACCESS & DATA Obihiro Shin chitose Domestic and International Air Routes Tomakomai Railway Routes Oshamanbe in the Tohoku Region Muroran Shinkansen (bullet train) Local train Shin Hakodate Sapporo （New Chitose） Ōminato Miyagi Prefecture is blessed with an abundance of natural beauty and Beijing Dalian numerous historic sites. Its capital, Sendai, boasts a population of over a million people and is Sendai仙台空港 Sendai Airport Seoul Airport Shin- filled with vitality and passion. Miyagi’s major attractions are introduced here. Komatsu Aomori Aomori Narita Izumo Hirosaki Nagoya（Chubu） Fukuoka Hiroshima Hachinohe Osaka（Itami） Shanghai Ōdate Osaka（kansai） Kuji Kobe Okinawa（Naha） Oga Taipei kansen Akita Morioka Honolulu Akita Shin Miyako Ōmagari Hanamaki Kamaishi Yokote Kitakami Guam Bangkok to the port of Hokkaido Sakata Ichinoseki （Tomakomai） Shinjō Naruko Yamagata Shinkansen Ishinomaki Matsushima International Murakami Yamagata Sendai Port of Sendai Domestic Approx. ShiroishiZaō Niigata Yonezawa 90minutes Fukushima (fastest train) from Tokyo to Sendai Aizu- Tohoku on the Tohoku wakamatsu Shinkansen Shinkansen Nagaoka Kōriyama Kashiwazaki to the port of Nagoya Sendai's Climate Naoetsu Echigo Iwaki （℃）（ F） yuzawa （mm） 30 120 Joetsu Shinkansen Nikko Precipitation 200 Temperature Nagano Utsunomiya Shinkansen Maebashi 20 90 Mito Takasaki 100 10 60 Omiya Tokyo 0 30 Chiba 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Publication Date : December 2019 Publisher : Asia Promotion Division, Miyagi Prefectural Government Address : 3-8-1 Honcho, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi
    [Show full text]
  • The Cohesive Strategy in the Northeast U.S
    The Cohesive Strategy in the Northeast U.S. September 2019 A brief history of the Cohesive Strategy Cohesive Strategy Vision: To safely and effectively extinguish fire, when needed; use fire where allowable; manage our natural resources; and as a Nation, live with wildland fire. The FLAME Act 2009 Federal Land Assistance, Management and Enhancement (FLAME) Act directs Departments of Agriculture and the Interior to develop a Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy A brief Timeline of the Cohesive Strategy PLANNING • 2009 FLAME Act • 2010 CS Vision, 3 Goals, Collaborative, Science-based approach • 2011 WFLC, WFEC, CSSC, RSCs, (alphabet soup) formed • 2011-2014 3 Phases: National and Regional Analyses, Assessments & Action Plans • 2014 National Strategy and Action Plan (Approved in April 2014) • 2015 NE Regional Action Plan Updated/Published IMPLEMENTATION • 2015 New WFLC Priorities, NSC formed, and Executive Mgr. hired • 2016 Regional Priorities established • 2017-19 Work on 4 priorities continues Three Biggest Challenges The Wildland Fire Problem… • Is not just a federal issue • Is not just a state issue • Is not just a local issue • Is not just a fire service issue Cohesive Strategy Vision --- Safely and effectively extinguish fire when needed; use fire where allowable; manage our natural resources; and, as a Nation, live with wildland fire. The Three National Cohesive Strategy Goals Goal #1 – Restoring & Maintaining Fire Resilient Landscapes Resilient Response landscapes to wildfire Goal #2 – Creating Fire Adapted Communities Fire adapted communities Science Goal #3 – Responding to Wildfires 8 The Cohesive Strategy Organization Northeast RSC Wildland Fire Leadership Council (WFLC) West RSC Southeast RSC A Way of Doing Business • Framework for a culture of “working better together” • Collaboration is the key Northeast Regional Strategy Committee • U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • HFA Irides Review Report Focusing on the 2011
    Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters HFA IRIDeS Review Report Focusing on 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake May 2014 International Research Institute of Disaster Science Tohoku University Japan Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters HFA IRIDeS Review Report Focusing on 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake May 2014 International Research Institute of Disaster Science Tohoku University Japan Preface Having experienced the catastrophic disaster in 2011, Tohoku University has founded the International Research Institute of Disaster Science (IRIDeS). Together with collaborating organizations from many countries and staff with a broad array of specializations, the IRIDeS conducts world-leading research on natural disaster science and disaster mitigation. Based on the lessons from the 2011 Great East Japan (Tohoku) Earthquake and Tsunami disaster, the IRIDeS aims to become a world center for the research/ study of disasters and disaster mitigation, learning from and building upon past lessons in disaster management from Japan and others around the world. Throughout, the IRIDeS should contribute to on- going recovery/reconstruction efforts in areas affected by the 2011 tsunami, conducting action-oriented research and pursuing effective disaster management to build a sustainable and resilient society. The 3rd United Nations World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction 2015 will be held on 14-18 March 2015 in Sendai City, one of the areas seriously damaged due to the 2011 Earthquake and Tsunami. The IRIDeS shall play an important role at the conference as an academic organization located in the hosting city. Drafting of this report, focusing on the 2011 Earthquake and Tsunami in terms of the core indicators of the Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015, is one of the contributory activities to the forthcoming event.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinkasan Island ▪From the Pier to Ajishima: and the Kinkasan Island
    Magnificent nature experience Sights in the national park Sanriku Fukko Ajishima Island National Park The Aji Shirahama beach with shoal water Oshika Gobansho Park is famous for its transparency of the water in the Tohoku region and very popular in The park has great views and even the summer. Sendai Domain in the Edo era had taken ▪Getting to the pier an advantage to have a lookout station By train: 15 minutes by Miyako Bus’ City Line there in preparation for the invasion of bound for Yamashita from JR Ishinomaki Station. the "Tosen" from China. Off at the stop “Ajishima Line Mae.” It’s a perfect spot for a 360-degree By car: 20 minutes from the Ishinomaki Kanan 青森県 panoramic view of the Oshika Peninsula 三 陸 復 興 国Interchange, 立 公 Sanriku 園 Expressway Kinkasan Island ▪From the pier to Ajishima: and the Kinkasan Island. 60 minutes by the Ajishima line (1,340 yen, one ▪Getting here 秋田県 way) By car: 90 minutes from the Ishinomaki 岩手県 ▪Contact us Regional Development Division, Kanan Interchange, Sanriku Expressway Oshika General Branch Office, Ishinomaki City ▪Contact us 編 入 区 域 TEL: 0225-45-2114 MAP P19 C-5 TEL：0225-45-2114 MAP P19 D-4 山形県 宮城県 福島県 Tashirojima Island MAP P19 C-4 Tashirojima Island is referred to as the "Cat Island" as it’s home to many cats. he Kinkasan Island, a spirit island located off the Oshika Peninsula, is known as one of the three In the past, which is It’s also said that most sacred places in To-oh (Three Mountains of Dewa and Mount Osore are the other two).
    [Show full text]